21.01.2015 Views

Hard_Edges_Mapping_SMD_FINAL_VERSION_Web

Hard_Edges_Mapping_SMD_FINAL_VERSION_Web

Hard_Edges_Mapping_SMD_FINAL_VERSION_Web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

38 <strong>Hard</strong> edges<br />

System and service response<br />

In this section we focus on the question of<br />

outcomes, particularly the outcomes which<br />

agencies working with people experiencing<br />

<strong>SMD</strong> are seeking to achieve from their<br />

interventions. However, it must be stressed that<br />

this current study was not designed to evaluate<br />

specific services or systems performance.<br />

For one thing, the kinds of data analysed for<br />

our profiling work, limited mainly to snapshots<br />

or relatively short records on episodes, falls<br />

far short of the longer-term tracking data<br />

which would ideally be looked at in detailed<br />

evaluation studies. That said, there are<br />

indications provided below of some encouraging<br />

short‐term outcomes from these services, but<br />

with much poorer results reported for people<br />

experiencing <strong>SMD</strong>2 and <strong>SMD</strong>3.<br />

utcomes achieved for five<br />

Figure 13 shows two findings clearly.<br />

Firstly, there is considerable variation in the<br />

achievement of target outcomes between<br />

different types of need. Thus a large majority<br />

of clients with needs in the mental health,<br />

offending (avoid harm to others) and housing<br />

(avoid eviction) fields achieved some short-term<br />

positive goals, whereas for substance misuse<br />

the level of positive achievement was somewhat<br />

lower and, for ‘paid work’ only a minority<br />

achieved a positive outcome (though given their<br />

enduring labour market barriers even this<br />

last result may be more promising than could<br />

perhaps have reasonably been expected, see<br />

also Johnsen & Watts, 2014).<br />

Secondly, it shows clearly that the pattern<br />

of lower positive outcome achievement<br />

with higher <strong>SMD</strong> level applies more or less<br />

outcomes Homelessness by service broad outcomes<strong>SMD</strong> group, across the range. It is not possible from the<br />

The SP dataset contains a lot of detailed data on quantitative data analysis alone to specify why<br />

g People<br />

needs and short-term<br />

clients<br />

outcomes<br />

2010/11<br />

across a wide this is the case, but clearly it is a matter that<br />

range of domains, such as health, debt, work, warrants further in-depth investigation.<br />

housing, substance misuse, and harm to others.<br />

Figure 13 summarises the pattern of outcomes<br />

in relation to five of the 17 categories of need<br />

covered by SP outcomes, by broad <strong>SMD</strong> level.<br />

Figure 13: Positive outcomes achieved for five selected outcomes by broad <strong>SMD</strong> group,<br />

Supporting People clients 2010/11<br />

AVOID EVICTION<br />

SUBSTANCE MISUSE<br />

HARM TO OTHERS<br />

MENTAL HEALTH<br />

0%<br />

10%<br />

20%<br />

30%<br />

40%<br />

50%<br />

60%<br />

70%<br />

80%<br />

90%<br />

100%<br />

PAID WORK<br />

<strong>SMD</strong> 1<br />

<strong>SMD</strong> 2<br />

<strong>SMD</strong> 3<br />

Source: Authors’ analyses of SP Short-term Outcomes 2010–11, cases with IDs only

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!