21.01.2015 Views

ISSUE 158 : Jan/Feb - 2003 - Australian Defence Force Journal

ISSUE 158 : Jan/Feb - 2003 - Australian Defence Force Journal

ISSUE 158 : Jan/Feb - 2003 - Australian Defence Force Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42<br />

AUSTRALIAN DEFENCE FORCE JOURNAL NO. <strong>158</strong> JANUARY/FEBRUARY <strong>2003</strong><br />

as well as violence.” 29 In the years following the<br />

French Revolution Napoleon’s Grande Armée<br />

capitalised not only on the RMA, but also the<br />

socio-political developments of the Revolution.<br />

This lay in stark contrast to their opponents.<br />

The Prussian Army<br />

The Prussian Army of 1806 and its leadership<br />

were the antithesis of the Grande Armée. Buoyed<br />

by their historical success, they were reliant upon<br />

outdated ideas, organisations and technology.<br />

Concepts and doctrine remained unchanged from<br />

the days of Frederick the Great. The tradition of<br />

harsh discipline produced “an army of<br />

automatons” 30 who adhered to a rigid system of<br />

shoulder-to-shoulder drill, in which precision was<br />

more desirable than speed or flexibility. While<br />

the infantry were well disciplined, overregimentation<br />

led to formalised tactics that<br />

discouraged initiative, and most were issued with<br />

50-year-old pattern muskets. The cavalry were<br />

bold but intensely conservative in organisation<br />

and role. The artillery arm was large in size but<br />

badly handled and often misemployed. 31<br />

Although they were numerically superior to<br />

the French, the Prussians could field only<br />

171,000 troops out of a total strength of 254,000<br />

due to flawed administration. Strategic mobility<br />

was reduced to a minimum through reliance on<br />

enormous supply trains and fixed magazines and<br />

supply depots. There was no proper staff corps<br />

and no corps HQs, and divisional staffs were<br />

poorly organised. As a result, orders from<br />

general HQ had to be incredibly detailed and<br />

often contradicted the actual situation on the<br />

ground. The chain of command and decisionmaking<br />

processes used in 1806 were so<br />

convoluted that David Chandler referred to the<br />

Prussian hierarchy as a “many-headed hydra”. 32<br />

An interesting comparison between the<br />

Prussian and French Armies is the relative age of<br />

their commanders. At Jena-Auerstädt Napoleon<br />

and his marshals were aged in their late thirties to<br />

early forties. The Prussian commanders,<br />

however, were positively elderly. The<br />

commander, Charles William Ferdinand (the<br />

Duke of Brunswick) was 71; his rival Friedrich<br />

Ludwig (Prince of Hohenlohe) was 61; cavalry<br />

General von Blücher was 64; and von Mollendorf<br />

– the senior royal adviser who still fancied<br />

himself as a field commander – the grand old age<br />

of 81. 33 Striking a balance between youth and<br />

experience, able to withstand the physical and<br />

mental rigors of modern warfare, and fully<br />

accustomed to the new way of warfare, the<br />

French commanders would simply run rings<br />

around their Prussian counterparts.<br />

Despite these shortcomings morale was high<br />

and an air of “effortless superiority” pervaded all<br />

ranks. 34 Amid this environment the Prussians did<br />

not envisage the disaster that was about to occur<br />

at the hands of Napoleon. In Chandler’s words,<br />

“the warriors of Prussia had to be taught the hard<br />

way that the realities of warfare had changed<br />

beyond all recognition in the 50 years since<br />

Rossbach and Leuthen.” 35<br />

The Prussian Campaign<br />

After the destruction of the Third Coalition at<br />

Austerlitz in December 1805, Napoleon turned<br />

his attention to Prussia. Under Frederick William<br />

III Prussia had avoided participation in earlier<br />

hostilities alongside Russia and Austria under<br />

thinly disguised neutrality, but had planned to<br />

“share in the liquidation of the French Empire” in<br />

the event of Napoleon’s anticipated collapse. 36<br />

The Prussian Government was Napoleon’s first<br />

target in a number of political dealings aimed to<br />

consolidate French domination over Europe. Due<br />

to the disposition of the Grande Armée on its<br />

southern frontier Prussia seemingly had little<br />

option but to capitulate, however in August 1806<br />

Frederick William decided to go to war against<br />

France. Once again, as F.N. Maude highlights,<br />

the scene was set for an epic struggle between the<br />

French republic and one of its aristocratic<br />

opponents:<br />

Here the old and the new school, absolute<br />

Monarchy and Democracy, both in their<br />

highest form of embodiment, met one another<br />

under fairly equal conditions, … 37<br />

True to form, but contrary to the response<br />

initially anticipated by the Prussian military<br />

leadership, Napoleon took the offensive.<br />

However, unlike the prelude to his victory over<br />

the Third Coalition the year before, the political<br />

situation leading up to the invasion of Prussia in<br />

1806 resulted in a high degree of uncertainty. His<br />

campaign plan was to advance through Saxony to<br />

Leipzig, in order to threaten Berlin, whilst

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!