26.01.2015 Views

Vessel Quotas and Operating Requirements Vessel Quotas and ...

Vessel Quotas and Operating Requirements Vessel Quotas and ...

Vessel Quotas and Operating Requirements Vessel Quotas and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Example calculations of water particle velocities showed that for the wave heights <strong>and</strong> periods typical of<br />

the wave climate in Glacier Bay proper, the velocities would be more difficult to compare in the various<br />

sites of interest because additional input parameters are required. These include the wave speed, C, <strong>and</strong><br />

the period of the vessel waves. The calculations performed show that the typical particle velocities were<br />

smaller than the design velocity of 10 feet per second (fps), which is used in aquariums to prevent marine<br />

fouling. Velocities of less than 10 fps are inferred to be required to allow marine growth. Velocities in<br />

the range of 10 fps do routinely occur in the shallow surf zone during wind wave events. Even in the<br />

shallowest water, as predicted by Airy theory, the maximum horizontal water particle velocity caused by<br />

the design boat wake is approximately 3 fps.<br />

Water particle velocity was not as suitable a parameter for analysis of vessel wake effects in Glacier Bay<br />

proper. The additional input information required is not readily available <strong>and</strong> would require making<br />

additional assumptions.<br />

6 CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY<br />

The purpose of this technical memor<strong>and</strong>um is to provide a method to evaluate existing <strong>and</strong> proposed<br />

vessel quotas <strong>and</strong> operating requirements in Glacier Bay National Park <strong>and</strong> Preserve. The method detailed<br />

in this technical memor<strong>and</strong>um will be used to classify all sites selected for full evaluation in the EIS.<br />

Some conclusions can be drawn based on our work so far <strong>and</strong> on the information contained within this<br />

technical memor<strong>and</strong>um. These include:<br />

• For most of Glacier Bay proper, vessel wakes pose little threat to the coastline.<br />

• There are specific locations where operating requirements may be necessary to prevent adverse<br />

effect to the shoreline. This may include creating a no-wake zone near the shoreline. See the<br />

Environmental Impact Statement for specific sites <strong>and</strong> evaluations.<br />

• The potential effect of vessel generated internal waves to all aspects of the environment is not<br />

known. Research indicates that internal waves have the potential to mix stratified layers of water.<br />

This could affect stratification of pelagic organisms like algae. Further scientific study is required<br />

to determine if they exist <strong>and</strong> their affects on the environment. It is likely that naturally occurring<br />

internal waves occur in Glacier Bay proper <strong>and</strong> would not be affected by vessels due to the<br />

shallow extent of influence by the vessel.<br />

• <strong>Vessel</strong> wake disturbance occurs close to the vessel producing the wake. Wakes are essentially<br />

dissipated within 2,000 feet of the vessel.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!