Addendum No. 1 - Build LACCD
Addendum No. 1 - Build LACCD
Addendum No. 1 - Build LACCD
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ADDENDUM <strong>No</strong>. 01, Request for Proposals (RFP) Number IT-022, SAP Upgrade, District’s 4.7C Enterprise System to SAP ECC 6.0, PROJECT ID: 40J-J05.18<br />
Request for Proposals (RFP) Number IT-022<br />
SAP Upgrade<br />
RFP Questions & Answers<br />
<strong>No</strong>. Vendor Question <strong>LACCD</strong> Answer<br />
1. It is mentioned in the RFP that the response be limited to total 60<br />
pages. Kindly suggest if the resumes of the proposed consultants<br />
are also counted in these 60 pages<br />
2. There seems to be typo on page 10 of 10 on “SAP Upgrade SOW<br />
Ver 1 10 13” regarding project duration. It mentions the start of<br />
project as Feb 1, 2012 . Kindly suggest the likely start date of the<br />
project.<br />
3. In the SOW document - the required resource does not have any<br />
mention of Functional Finance Lead (FI/CO, FM, GM), Functional<br />
Purchasing (MM/IM/PM) lead and ESS lead etc., have not been<br />
mentioned. Does <strong>LACCD</strong> expect vendor to provide these<br />
resources<br />
4. The pricing form does not ask for Individual Contribution and<br />
Costing. For example, under Classification 3 : Team Members for<br />
“Phase I-Project Preparation", if we have multiple consultants<br />
working, do you want us to provide the total cost or do you want us<br />
to break the cost for each Individual<br />
5. Within SOW Attachment 2, please confirm whether <strong>LACCD</strong> will<br />
assign a dedicated PM apart from the Vendor PMO.<br />
6. Within SOW Attachment 2, please confirm whether, although<br />
the majority of the work will be done onsite, <strong>LACCD</strong> would allow<br />
utilization of Offsite and/or Offshore resources<br />
7. Public Sector references: Is <strong>LACCD</strong> open for corporate<br />
references for SAP Upgrade<br />
8. General Request: We need at least 1 week time from the day<br />
<strong>LACCD</strong> responds to questions and final submission of<br />
response. Will this be provided to all bidders<br />
9. The SAP version mentioned in the SOW section states that it is<br />
4.7C. Is it 4.7 with enterprise version 2 or 4.6C<br />
10. Is Solution Manager 7.0 or above installed If not, is installation<br />
of Solution Manager part of the scope (it is required by SAP to<br />
have Solution Manager installed for an Upgrade)<br />
11. Is Unicode migration a part of upgrade plan If yes, will it be<br />
done in one cycle (along with upgrade) or two cycles (first<br />
technical upgrade, then Unicode conversion)<br />
Resumes are not included in the page count. However,<br />
resumes should be limited to three pages each.<br />
This should read “Feb 1, 2013”, and be advised that the<br />
contract date is subject to Board of Trustee approval.<br />
This is a technical upgrade. Regression testing will be<br />
completed with internal staff.<br />
Individual costs with a total.<br />
Yes, <strong>LACCD</strong> will assign an internal resource. See chart<br />
depicting project responsibility.<br />
On site only.<br />
This is not mandatory, just nice to know. <strong>No</strong> vendor will be<br />
excluded if they only have private sector experience.<br />
This response is posted to the web site one week before<br />
proposals are due.<br />
4.7C Enterprise.<br />
Yes, it needs to be installed as part of the upgrade.<br />
<strong>No</strong>, Unicode is not required.<br />
2