27.01.2015 Views

Addendum No. 1 - Build LACCD

Addendum No. 1 - Build LACCD

Addendum No. 1 - Build LACCD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ADDENDUM <strong>No</strong>. 01, Request for Proposals (RFP) Number IT-022, SAP Upgrade, District’s 4.7C Enterprise System to SAP ECC 6.0, PROJECT ID: 40J-J05.18<br />

Request for Proposals (RFP) Number IT-022<br />

SAP Upgrade<br />

RFP Questions & Answers<br />

<strong>No</strong>. Vendor Question <strong>LACCD</strong> Answer<br />

1. It is mentioned in the RFP that the response be limited to total 60<br />

pages. Kindly suggest if the resumes of the proposed consultants<br />

are also counted in these 60 pages<br />

2. There seems to be typo on page 10 of 10 on “SAP Upgrade SOW<br />

Ver 1 10 13” regarding project duration. It mentions the start of<br />

project as Feb 1, 2012 . Kindly suggest the likely start date of the<br />

project.<br />

3. In the SOW document - the required resource does not have any<br />

mention of Functional Finance Lead (FI/CO, FM, GM), Functional<br />

Purchasing (MM/IM/PM) lead and ESS lead etc., have not been<br />

mentioned. Does <strong>LACCD</strong> expect vendor to provide these<br />

resources<br />

4. The pricing form does not ask for Individual Contribution and<br />

Costing. For example, under Classification 3 : Team Members for<br />

“Phase I-Project Preparation", if we have multiple consultants<br />

working, do you want us to provide the total cost or do you want us<br />

to break the cost for each Individual<br />

5. Within SOW Attachment 2, please confirm whether <strong>LACCD</strong> will<br />

assign a dedicated PM apart from the Vendor PMO.<br />

6. Within SOW Attachment 2, please confirm whether, although<br />

the majority of the work will be done onsite, <strong>LACCD</strong> would allow<br />

utilization of Offsite and/or Offshore resources<br />

7. Public Sector references: Is <strong>LACCD</strong> open for corporate<br />

references for SAP Upgrade<br />

8. General Request: We need at least 1 week time from the day<br />

<strong>LACCD</strong> responds to questions and final submission of<br />

response. Will this be provided to all bidders<br />

9. The SAP version mentioned in the SOW section states that it is<br />

4.7C. Is it 4.7 with enterprise version 2 or 4.6C<br />

10. Is Solution Manager 7.0 or above installed If not, is installation<br />

of Solution Manager part of the scope (it is required by SAP to<br />

have Solution Manager installed for an Upgrade)<br />

11. Is Unicode migration a part of upgrade plan If yes, will it be<br />

done in one cycle (along with upgrade) or two cycles (first<br />

technical upgrade, then Unicode conversion)<br />

Resumes are not included in the page count. However,<br />

resumes should be limited to three pages each.<br />

This should read “Feb 1, 2013”, and be advised that the<br />

contract date is subject to Board of Trustee approval.<br />

This is a technical upgrade. Regression testing will be<br />

completed with internal staff.<br />

Individual costs with a total.<br />

Yes, <strong>LACCD</strong> will assign an internal resource. See chart<br />

depicting project responsibility.<br />

On site only.<br />

This is not mandatory, just nice to know. <strong>No</strong> vendor will be<br />

excluded if they only have private sector experience.<br />

This response is posted to the web site one week before<br />

proposals are due.<br />

4.7C Enterprise.<br />

Yes, it needs to be installed as part of the upgrade.<br />

<strong>No</strong>, Unicode is not required.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!