Addendum No. 1 - Build LACCD

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ADDENDUM No. 01, Request for Proposals (RFP) Number IT-022, SAP Upgrade, District’s 4.7C Enterprise System to SAP ECC 6.0, PROJECT ID: 40J-J05.18 No. Vendor Question LACCD Answer 54. Oracle DB 10.2.0.4.0 is out of support. Do you plan to upgrade Yes. The vendor should include the DB upgrade to 11 as part your DB to 11 of the deliverables. 55. Unicode or Non-Unicode If Non-Unicode, do you plan to See note above. Non-Unicode. switch in conjunction with the upgrade 56. Do you have any restrictions which would not allow Local resources only. development done offshore 57. How many Z Objects do you have in the system See answer to question 40. 58. Who will be performing the Q&A Testing See the SOW. 59. How large are the systems Not enough information is provided for the District to answer. 60. On the RFP mentions the firm must have 5 years of Upgrade Experience. We are an SAP Consulting Company. Our company was formed two years ago but the founder has been doing SAP Basis for over 14 years (with over 15 SAP upgrades). Do we qualify for this project 61. Can you please provide the team structure at LACCD that will be working with the consulting firm for the upgrade Would help to know the shared responsibilities between the consulting firm and LACCD. 62. What is the expected timeline for the complete upgrade Any specific milestones attached to timeline 63. What are the other systems (SAP and 3rd party) connected to ERP system It would be nice to have the landscape. 64. Can we have details of Hardware, OS and databases along with the type of support LACCD has signed up to the respective vendor 65. Do we have any incumbents for this RFP Any current vendor working In similar arena bidding on this project If yes, specific pain points with the current vendor. 66. Which personnel does the District confirmed “key” personnel 67. Was an upgrade assessment performed by SAP, and if so, is that assessment available Yes, if the employee experience is there. See the responsibility chart that is part of the RFP and SOW. See the SOW. See the landscape diagram that is part of the RFP. The 3 rd party external system that are interfaced are SIS (Student Information System and Protocol (Scheduling), See the landscape diagram that is part of the RFP. The vendor HW is HP. The RFP defines the intent of the District. Functional and management resources. No. 6
ADDENDUM No. 01, Request for Proposals (RFP) Number IT-022, SAP Upgrade, District’s 4.7C Enterprise System to SAP ECC 6.0, PROJECT ID: 40J-J05.18 No. Vendor Question LACCD Answer 68. See the RFP and SOW. Functional Test cases outside of HR Please confirm that test cases will be developed by LACCD Payroll and security will be completed for LACCD for the most personnel part. 69. We do not gather that information at this time. How many end to end business process scenarios/test cases 70. Avg no of unique transactions (unique field flow/screen flow) in each test case 71. How many data variations in each test case We do not gather that information at this time. We do not have that metric. The test cases are very detailed. 72. How many Security Roles Not enough information is provided for the District to answer. 73. Is testing automation in scope If yes, do you own HP QTP or any other test automation tool 74. How many golden transactions/test cases to be tested for performance testing 75. Number of virtual users 76. Do you own HP Load Runner/Performance Center with SAP protocol 77. You have mentioned in your Statement of Work document, section #4 last paragraph, that you have already procured the necessary hardware for the upgrade. What hardware have you procured and is it IA64 – Itanium platform. 78. What is the downtime window for Production (Maximum possible allowed) and are there any additional restrictions on downtime 79. Do you have SAP Solution Manager implemented in the landscape If yes, please confirm the version and whether maintenance optimizer is used in the landscape; in addition to that, please provide the support package details. 80. Based on the typical restrictions (academic calendar), have you decided upon the go-live date (or) Are there any restrictions to go-live before / after any specific date 81. What are the current pain points with the existing infrastructure, technical, functional, security, etc. Please provide a detailed view by module or business process or technical issues. See RFP. QTP and HP QC are the LACCD main testing tools used to certify quality. To be determined as part of the upgrade. See modules in use at LACCD as a guide. All users operate on virtual machines. No Yes, have procured and installed the HW. HP Blades BL870. It is Itanium. We need to work within the academic calendar for taking the system off line. The method for the upgrade is minimizing down time. See answer above. To be determined as part of the blue print. But we do need to take into account the academic calendar year. The District needs to move from one release to another. This is a technical upgrade. 7
Page 1 and 2: ADDENDUM No. 01, Request for Propos
Page 5: ADDENDUM No. 01, Request for Propos

Addendum No. 1 - Build LACCD

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?