Evaluation of MSc programmes: MSc in Healthcare Management ...
Evaluation of MSc programmes: MSc in Healthcare Management ...
Evaluation of MSc programmes: MSc in Healthcare Management ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1.1 Introduction<br />
This report outl<strong>in</strong>es the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from an educational evaluation that<br />
comprehensively measured the impact that masters’ degrees <strong>in</strong> healthcare<br />
management, leadership & management development and quality and safety <strong>in</strong><br />
healthcare management had on graduates who completed the <strong>programmes</strong> at<br />
the Institute <strong>of</strong> Leadership, Royal College <strong>of</strong> Surgeons (RCSI) <strong>in</strong> Ireland. The<br />
results presented here <strong>in</strong>clude graduates’ evaluation <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> their<br />
course, the extent to which graduates reported the development <strong>of</strong> leadership,<br />
management and generic capabilities and, the impact the master’s programme<br />
had on graduates’ subsequent careers. The participants <strong>in</strong> this study were<br />
graduates who completed a <strong>MSc</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Healthcare</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, <strong>MSc</strong> <strong>in</strong> Leadership<br />
and <strong>Management</strong> Development or <strong>MSc</strong> <strong>in</strong> Quality and Safety <strong>in</strong> <strong>Healthcare</strong><br />
<strong>Management</strong>. These <strong>programmes</strong> have been delivered at RCSI s<strong>in</strong>ce 2005 with<br />
the first graduates <strong>in</strong> 2007. The first section <strong>of</strong> the evaluation reports on the<br />
methods used to evaluate the masters’ <strong>programmes</strong> at the Institute <strong>of</strong><br />
Leadership. This is followed by the presentation <strong>of</strong> the results which <strong>in</strong>cludes:<br />
the demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the sample, the results from the survey that measured<br />
graduates’ experience <strong>of</strong> their programme <strong>of</strong> study, the extent to which<br />
graduates made ga<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> leadership capabilities and, f<strong>in</strong>ally,<br />
the employment dest<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> graduates follow<strong>in</strong>g the completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme.<br />
1.2 Methods<br />
The evaluation is pr<strong>in</strong>cipally concerned with measur<strong>in</strong>g the quality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
programme and the educational and pr<strong>of</strong>essional outcomes achieved by<br />
graduates as a consequence <strong>of</strong> the programme. In this study outcomes are<br />
classified as short to medium term outcomes and longer-term impacts. Short to<br />
medium term outcomes <strong>in</strong>cluded students satisfaction with their programme <strong>of</strong><br />
study, academic achievement, the development <strong>of</strong> generic capabilities<br />
(graduates’ ability to tackle unfamiliar problems, work as a member <strong>of</strong> a team,<br />
3