Evaluation of MSc programmes: MSc in Healthcare Management ...
Evaluation of MSc programmes: MSc in Healthcare Management ...
Evaluation of MSc programmes: MSc in Healthcare Management ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1.3 Results<br />
The demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the sample that completed the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>programmes</strong> at RCSI <strong>in</strong> Dubl<strong>in</strong> is outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> table 4.<br />
Table 4 Demographic, Academic and Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> Master’s Graduates<br />
Characteristic<br />
Age <strong>in</strong> Years M, (SD) 39.1 (8.0)<br />
Gender (%)<br />
Female 88.1<br />
Male 11.9<br />
Year Degree Completed (%)<br />
2007 6.7<br />
2008 6.7<br />
2009 37.8<br />
2010 22.2<br />
2011 26.7<br />
Strand Degree Completed (%)<br />
<strong>MSc</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Healthcare</strong> <strong>Management</strong><br />
<strong>MSc</strong> <strong>in</strong> Leadership & <strong>Management</strong> Development<br />
<strong>MSc</strong> <strong>in</strong> Quality and Safety <strong>in</strong> <strong>Healthcare</strong> <strong>Management</strong> 6<br />
63.8<br />
29.8<br />
1.3.1 Graduates’ <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Quality <strong>of</strong> their Educational Programme<br />
This section reports on the results <strong>of</strong> the Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)<br />
and the Extended Course Experience Questionnaire, which were used to evaluate<br />
graduates’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> the courses and the extent to which they<br />
developed a number <strong>of</strong> generic and graduate capabilities. The results <strong>in</strong> this<br />
section are reported <strong>in</strong> relation to students’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong><br />
teach<strong>in</strong>g, the extent to which they were provided with clear goals and standards,<br />
the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> workload, the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> assessment, graduates’<br />
overall satisfaction with the course and the development <strong>of</strong> generic skills. The<br />
Extended Course Experience Questionnaire, used <strong>in</strong> conjunction with the CEQ,<br />
measured graduates’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> their <strong>in</strong>tegration <strong>in</strong>to the learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />
community <strong>of</strong> the Institute, the extent to which they were <strong>in</strong>tellectually<br />
motivated by the programme <strong>of</strong> study and the development <strong>of</strong> graduate qualities.<br />
The results are presented <strong>in</strong> relation to the <strong>in</strong>dividual items that comprise each<br />
<strong>of</strong> the scales <strong>of</strong> the CEQ and Extended CEQ and then <strong>in</strong> relation to each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
summated scale scores. To aid <strong>in</strong>terpretation and standardise scores across the<br />
CEQ and the Extended CEQ the mean item scores <strong>in</strong> the tables and figures are<br />
based on a l<strong>in</strong>ear transformation where the 1 to 5 categories (strongly disagree<br />
9