4 description of the human environment, potential ... - Lee Altenberg
4 description of the human environment, potential ... - Lee Altenberg
4 description of the human environment, potential ... - Lee Altenberg
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Final Environmental Impact Statement<br />
sites on <strong>the</strong> Property than were recorded in <strong>the</strong> archaeological inventory survey report.<br />
Clare Apana also provided to <strong>the</strong> Commission a copy <strong>of</strong> a letter from Daniel Kanahele<br />
addressed to SHPD explaining what he considered were <strong>the</strong> inadequacies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
archeological inventory survey. In <strong>the</strong>ir comments on <strong>the</strong> Draft EIS <strong>the</strong> Maui Planning<br />
Commission directed representative Charlie Jencks to Work<br />
with people that have provided comments regarding <strong>the</strong> archaeology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> site to clarify<br />
findings<br />
In response to <strong>the</strong> Maui Planning Commission o<br />
ie Jencks, consultant archaeologist Aki Sinoto, and<br />
consultant cultural advisor Kimokeo Kapahulehua participated in a site visit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<br />
were archaeologist Morgan Davis and cultural historian Hinano Rodrigues. Community<br />
members present included: Lucienne de Naie, Daniel Kanahele, Janet Six, Elle Cochran,<br />
Uÿilani Kapu, Keÿeaumoku Kapu, <strong>Lee</strong> <strong>Altenberg</strong>, and ÿEkolu Lindsey. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
community members had previously: 1) presented testimony, or were present, at <strong>the</strong> Maui<br />
ft EIS was<br />
discussed; 2) submitted information to SHPD claiming that <strong>the</strong>y had found archaeological<br />
sites on <strong>the</strong> Property that had not been included in <strong>the</strong> archaeological inventory survey<br />
dated March 2010 included in <strong>the</strong> Draft EIS; and 3) submitted written comments on <strong>the</strong><br />
Draft EIS expressing concerns regarding archaeological sites on <strong>the</strong> Property.<br />
Subsequent to <strong>the</strong> site visit, SHPD issued a letter dated September 8, 2010 stating that no<br />
significant unrecorded sites were noted at that time (i.e. during <strong>the</strong> August, 26, 2010 site<br />
visit). <br />
March 2010) and requested revisions, including: 1) editorial changes; 2) that <strong>the</strong> total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> survey man-hours and <strong>the</strong> spacing <strong>of</strong> survey transects be noted; and 3) a large<br />
plan map <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey area with sites and features plotted be included. In addition, <strong>the</strong><br />
<br />
work in this area and nicely incorporates previous surveys in <strong>the</strong> discussion <strong>of</strong> current<br />
<br />
<br />
inventory survey (dated March 2010), archaeologist Aki Sinoto: 1) revised <strong>the</strong><br />
archaeological inventory survey report t<br />
revised archaeological inventory survey report to SHPD in April 2011.<br />
In July and August <strong>of</strong> 2011, Daniel Kanahele <strong>of</strong> Maui Cultural Lands submitted letters to<br />
ie Jencks and SHPD providing additional<br />
comments on <strong>the</strong> archaeological inventory survey (dated March 2010) that was included<br />
ie Jencks, consultant<br />
archaeologist Aki Sinoto, and consultant cultural advisor Kimokeo Kapahulehua<br />
responded to <strong>the</strong>se letters in writing. In <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 2011 Maui Cultural Lands members<br />
also made a presentation to SHPD regarding <strong>the</strong>ir inspections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Property.<br />
CHAPTER 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT, POTENTIAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES<br />
98