Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission
Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission
Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
28<br />
Governing partnerships | Partnerships and value for money – <strong>the</strong> costs and benefits<br />
Box B<br />
Integrated back-office functions<br />
The services use a BT Call Line Concentrator to prevent 999 calls getting lost in <strong>the</strong><br />
infrastructure. Whereas each service previously had three such call lines, each costing<br />
approximately £100,000, <strong>the</strong>re are now four in total for all three services.<br />
A common Geographic Information System.<br />
Joint use of buildings. Ambulances now operate out of fire stations, which has led to<br />
reduction in building maintenance costs of £750,000, against <strong>the</strong> additional cost of<br />
£350,000 involved in moving vehicles around.<br />
Common procurement of vehicles, which are now jointly managed from one site and<br />
with new focus on outcomes (for example, reliability).<br />
Source: <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />
What benefits do partnerships bring<br />
67 There are no performance indicators to measure <strong>the</strong> performance of partnerships directly.<br />
The <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>’s quality of life indicators are <strong>the</strong> best attempt yet, and are based<br />
on published and widely available data. However, <strong>the</strong>ir use is at local authorities’<br />
discretion.<br />
68 We recognise that it is only possible to measure <strong>the</strong> outcomes of some initiatives on a<br />
long-term timescale; for example, better outcomes for children and young people. While<br />
short-term benefits may dissipate, investment in prevention may pay off later in a young<br />
person’s life; but it is difficult to track this or to ascribe <strong>the</strong> difference to any one particular<br />
intervention many years previously.<br />
‘I suppose what I’m getting at is that if you wanted to look at how good a<br />
partnership is, perhaps you can’t go right to <strong>the</strong> outcome. Perhaps <strong>the</strong>re’s as much<br />
value in looking at have things changed as a result of partnership (and) what you<br />
have done differently as a result . . . What has changed in ei<strong>the</strong>r your priorities (or)<br />
how many decisions have you made that have hurt to accommodate <strong>the</strong> needs of<br />
<strong>the</strong> partnership and what working practices have changed’<br />
Chief executive, metropolitan borough council