11.02.2015 Views

Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission

Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission

Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Governing partnerships | Governing partnerships for better <strong>accountability</strong> 39<br />

88 One of <strong>the</strong> main corporate governance problems that <strong>the</strong> boards of public organisations<br />

experience is <strong>the</strong> quality of information that <strong>the</strong>y can rely on when <strong>the</strong>y take decisions.<br />

The sheer volume of information presented in board papers can be a problem, particularly<br />

for non-executives and community representatives, who may not have <strong>the</strong> time or skills to<br />

interpret it properly. Three important systems provide <strong>the</strong> information that underpins<br />

decision making in corporate bodies: risk management, performance management and<br />

financial management. They form <strong>the</strong> basis of all effective <strong>accountability</strong>.<br />

Risk management<br />

89 The growth in partnership working means that organisations face increased financial,<br />

legal and reputational risks if problems arise. A few cases have resulted in a significant<br />

loss of public funds when things have gone wrong in partnerships.<br />

90 Risk management is <strong>the</strong> least developed of <strong>the</strong> three critical systems and processes<br />

within corporate bodies and <strong>the</strong>refore within partnerships. Risk management is inherently<br />

tied to decision-making processes; <strong>the</strong>se are less clear in partnerships than in corporate<br />

bodies, so this creates a ‘double bind’ for partnerships seeking to assess risks.<br />

‘If <strong>the</strong> partnership is large enough and <strong>the</strong>refore is making decisions collectively,<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than individual decisions as separate organisations, those collective<br />

decisions are potentially leaving yourself open to future risks, claims, liabilities. You<br />

may need to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r that partnership needs to be formalised as a legal<br />

entity in itself.’<br />

Head of cabinet, district council<br />

‘I think where <strong>the</strong> partnership is a service delivery partnership with a formal and<br />

structured agreement to pool resources and staff etc, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re will be a very<br />

robust risk assessment done as we enter into <strong>the</strong> partnership. Where <strong>the</strong><br />

partnerships are more about bringing existing service providers toge<strong>the</strong>r . . . <strong>the</strong>n I<br />

don’t think that we have got a robust risk assessment process in place yet.’<br />

Head of corporate performance, metropolitan borough council<br />

91 We have identified <strong>the</strong> following weaknesses in <strong>the</strong> way that public bodies address <strong>the</strong><br />

risks involved in working in partnerships:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!