11.02.2015 Views

Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission

Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission

Bridging the accountability gap - Audit Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48<br />

Governing partnerships | Governing partnerships for better <strong>accountability</strong><br />

information strategy that outlines how and when <strong>the</strong>y will bring information systems<br />

toge<strong>the</strong>r across <strong>the</strong> partners (Case study 8).<br />

Case study 8<br />

West Berkshire Council<br />

West Berkshire Council openly shares knowledge with its partners on <strong>the</strong> LSP.<br />

Information systems and protocols are available to support partnership objectives<br />

and clear information sharing protocols are in place, which help to diffuse conflict and<br />

promote openness. Most partners attend partnership meetings and joint working<br />

takes place with o<strong>the</strong>r statutory bodies. For example, <strong>the</strong> police have seconded staff<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Council to investigate closer methods of working and to forge productive<br />

working relationships. Partners feel that <strong>the</strong> Council has a flexible approach to<br />

partnership working, which enables <strong>the</strong>m to respond to changing needs.<br />

Source: <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>, 2004<br />

112 Joint commissioning highlights <strong>the</strong> governance difficulties that integration can bring<br />

(Box C).<br />

Box C<br />

Supporting People: governance challenges<br />

The Supporting People programme illustrates <strong>the</strong> difficulty of securing effective<br />

governance in partnerships. Supporting People commissioning bodies led by <strong>the</strong><br />

administering local authority (ALA) and involving health, probation and district<br />

councils in two-tier authorities should set <strong>the</strong> local strategy and drive local<br />

programmes. Over 63 <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> inspections show that, two years after <strong>the</strong><br />

launch of <strong>the</strong> scheme (of £1.72 billion funding), some of those involved in <strong>the</strong>se<br />

overarching commissioning bodies are still not clear about <strong>the</strong>ir roles and<br />

responsibilities. In some cases, health and/or probation partners do not attend<br />

regularly and <strong>the</strong> arrangement whereby one PCT or district council representative can<br />

speak for or commit <strong>the</strong>ir peers is unclear. In reality in <strong>the</strong>se local authorities, <strong>the</strong><br />

commissioning body is not governing <strong>the</strong> programme and where <strong>the</strong> role of <strong>the</strong><br />

accountable officer is also weak, by default, leadership falls to <strong>the</strong> council’s middle<br />

management Supporting People lead officer. In some cases, <strong>the</strong>re are no reporting<br />

arrangements from that individual to <strong>the</strong> council’s treasurer, members and senior

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!