20.02.2015 Views

download the publication - Transferware Collectors Club

download the publication - Transferware Collectors Club

download the publication - Transferware Collectors Club

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“but like all o<strong>the</strong>r attempts <strong>the</strong>y do not equal <strong>the</strong> productions of S&G for<br />

Mr Wedgwood,” <strong>the</strong> implication being that Thomas Rothwell was being<br />

employed as an engraver.<br />

There are some examples of engravings for transfer printing signed by<br />

Rothwell c1763-1767. Stretton is unsure whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se engravings were<br />

done at Liverpool or Hanley. At <strong>the</strong> time Stretton’s work was published<br />

(1966) <strong>the</strong>re was in his collection a creamware bowl with a black print of a<br />

shepherd and shepherdess in a rural landscape signed ‘Rothwell Sculpt’.<br />

Also extant were two teapots of this period in Liverpool Museum one with<br />

a black transfer print of Minerva surrounded by clouds and symbols of<br />

Wisdom and <strong>the</strong> legend ‘Let Wisdom Unite Us’ signed ‘T Rothwell<br />

Sculpt.’Also in <strong>the</strong> City of Liverpool Museum is an unmarked mug<br />

ornamented with a Scene of ‘The Death of Wolfe’ printed in black. This<br />

print was signed ‘Rothwell sculpt’. Elizabeth Collard in ‘The Potters View<br />

of Canada’ postulates that Rothwell worked for one of <strong>the</strong> early<br />

creamware potters of Liverpool. A tea caddy currently on <strong>the</strong> Internet with<br />

Cathcart Antiques of Australia has <strong>the</strong> identical print which is attributed to<br />

Rothwell and <strong>the</strong> caddy being attributed to Neale, <strong>the</strong> point here being that<br />

if this attribution is correct <strong>the</strong>n it confirms that Rothwell was at H.Palmer<br />

at Hanley, bearing in mind that Palmer’s dates were 1760 –1788 and<br />

Palmer and Neale were in partnership from 1769-1776 at <strong>the</strong> Church<br />

Works, Hanley. It is now generally accepted that Rothwell was with<br />

Humphrey Palmer during this period.<br />

The second teapot in Liverpool Museum again has a black print of ‘The<br />

Haymakers’ signed ‘T.Rothwell Delin Et Sculpt’. This ‘The Haymakers’<br />

print also occurs on <strong>the</strong> reverse of a teapot in <strong>the</strong> Fitzwilliam Museum,<br />

Cambridge. This print is signed ‘T.R.S.’. The o<strong>the</strong>r side of that teapot has a<br />

black print of a man and a woman sitting at a table on which stands a<br />

coffee pot and cup and saucer, <strong>the</strong> man smokes a long stemmed clay pipe,<br />

<strong>the</strong> whole print is surrounded by a framework of rococo scrolls and<br />

flowers. Incidentally ‘The Haymakers’ print on <strong>the</strong> Cambridge teapot is<br />

taken from <strong>the</strong> same copper plate used on <strong>the</strong> Liverpool Museum teapot.<br />

After completing our research we are still unable to ascertain with<br />

certainty whe<strong>the</strong>r Shaw is right and that Rothwell was employed by<br />

Palmer at Hanley or whe<strong>the</strong>r he was still at Liverpool perhaps being<br />

employed by Sadler and Green. According to E Stanley Price, in addition<br />

to five named engravers employed by Sadler and Green (John Evans,<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!