21.02.2015 Views

Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory

Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory

Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 4. ORDINALS 37<br />

Theorem 4.32 (Cantor Normal Form) Fix θ > 1. Every ordinal α can be written in<br />

exactly one way as α = θ β1 · γ 1 + · · · + θ β k<br />

· γ k with β 1 > · · · > β k and γ 1 , . . . , γ k < θ.<br />

The Cantor Normal Form Theorem for θ = 10 justifies our use of decimal notations<br />

for natural numbers. For θ = ω it offers “notations” (in terms of natural numbers) for<br />

all ordinals below ε 0 := ⋂ {α | ω α = α} = ⋃ {ω, ω ω , ω ωω , . . .}. This is used in Gentzen’s<br />

consistency proof for Peano arithmetic.<br />

Definition 4.33 α is called critical for the operation F : OR 2 → OR if β, γ < α ⇒<br />

F (β, γ) < α.<br />

□<br />

Exercises<br />

94 ♣ Show: α · ω is the least ordinal > α that is critical for +.<br />

95 ♣ For α ω, the following are equivalent:<br />

1. α is critical for +; 2. β < α ⇒ β + α = α; 3. ∃ξ (α = ω ξ ).<br />

96 ♣ Assume α ω.<br />

Show: α ω is the least ordinal > α that is critical for multiplication.<br />

97 ♣ Show that, for α ω, the following are equivalent:<br />

1. α is critical for multiplication; 2. β < α ⇒ β · α = α; 3. ∃ξ (α = ω ωξ ).<br />

98 ♣ Show: every initial is critical for addition, multiplication and exponentiation.<br />

4.8 Well-ordering of OR × OR<br />

Definition 4.34 Define the relation < on OR × OR by:<br />

(α, β) < (α ′ , β ′ ) :≡<br />

max(α, β) < max(α ′ , β ′ ), or: max(α, β) = max(α ′ , β ′ ) ∧ [α < α ′ ∨ (α = α ′ ∧ β < β ′ )].<br />

□<br />

99 ♣ Exercise Show:<br />

1. < well-orders OR × OR,<br />

2. every product γ × γ is an initial segment<br />

(if (α, β) < (α ′ , β ′ ) ∈ γ × γ, then (α, β) ∈ γ × γ),<br />

3. the product ω × ω is well-ordered in type ω,<br />

4. every product ω α × ω α (α > 0) is well-ordered in type ω α .<br />

Hint. 4 says that, if Γ : OR × OR → OR is the unique order-preserving map, then<br />

Γ(ω α , ω α ) = ω α . Use induction w.r.t. α. If equality doesn’t hold, then we must have<br />

Γ(ω α , ω α ) > ω α . Then (β, γ) ∈ ω α × ω α exists such that Γ(β, γ) = ω α , etc.<br />

Part 4 of this exercise has the important<br />

Corollary 4.35 ω α × ω α = 1 ω α .<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!