Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory
Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory
Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 6<br />
Cardinals<br />
6.1 Definition<br />
The cardinal (cardinal number) of a set A is an object |A| such that the following equivalence<br />
is satisfied:<br />
|A| = |B| ⇔ A = 1 B.<br />
(A = 1 B means that a bijection between A and B exists —See Definition 4.23.2 p. 35.)<br />
A cardinal (number) is a cardinal (number) of a set.<br />
The Frege-Russell definition of cardinals is |A| = def {B | B = 1 A}. This satisfies the<br />
equivalence. However, |A| is a set only if A = ∅. Assuming AC, the following is a definition<br />
of |A| as a set such that the above equivalence is provable:<br />
Definition 6.1 |A| = def<br />
⋂ {α ∈ OR | α =1 A}.<br />
□<br />
This defines |A| to be a canonical element of the Frege-Russell cardinal of A.<br />
If the Regularity Axiom is available, the following definition can be used also (Scott;<br />
see Lemma 4.22 p.32):<br />
Definition 6.2 |A| = def Bottom({B | B = 1 A})<br />
(= {B | B = 1 A ∧ ∀C (C = 1 A ⇒ ρ(B) ρ(C))}). □<br />
This makes |A| a canonical selection of the Frege-Russell cardinal of A. If neither AC nor<br />
Foundation are available, a definition of cardinality satisfying the required equivalence is<br />
not possible (Levy). In that situation one solution remains: consider the operation | | as<br />
a primitive notion and the above equivalence as an axiom.<br />
For the following, it is irrelevant how cardinals have been introduced, as long as this<br />
equivalence is satisfied.<br />
6.2 Elementary Properties and Arithmetic<br />
Definition 6.3 ℵ α = def |ω α |; an aleph is a cardinal of the form ℵ α .<br />
□<br />
AC is equivalent with the statement that every cardinal is an aleph.<br />
Without loss of generality you may assume that 6.1 is satisfied whenever A has a<br />
well-ordering. In that case:<br />
41