Global entrepreneurship report - ResearchGate
Global entrepreneurship report - ResearchGate
Global entrepreneurship report - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Scope of Entrepreneurial Activity<br />
active individuals in each country. The last three columns indicate<br />
whether or not a country was involved in previous GEM<br />
assessments.<br />
The TEA index average across countries — which gives<br />
equal weight to each country regardless of size — was 8 percent.<br />
However, when the size of the labor force in each of the GEM<br />
countries is taken into account, the prevalence rate climbs to 12<br />
percent. This reflects the impact of the 1.4 billion persons in the<br />
labor force in China and India, half the population represented by<br />
the sample. Further, dividing the total count of TEA participants,<br />
286 million, by the proportion of the world population included in<br />
the GEM 2002 countries (62 percent) yields a global estimate of<br />
460 million. This number may in fact underestimate the scope of<br />
entrepreneurial activity worldwide because most countries not yet<br />
included in the GEM assessment are developing nations with<br />
massive populations. Heavily populated countries such as Egypt,<br />
Indonesia, Iran, Nigeria, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Turkey<br />
and Vietnam may exhibit higher TEA rates than the more<br />
developed nations already represented in the GEM analysis.<br />
What is to be made of this? One basis of comparison<br />
might be the human birth rate. For 2002 the projected human<br />
birth rate for the world is 2.2 births per year per 100 in the<br />
population, or 135 million births for a global population of 6.1<br />
billion. The total estimate of the global count of those<br />
entrepreneurially active at 460 million is more than three times<br />
that number! Participating in business start-ups is clearly a major<br />
feature of the work lives of many individuals — affecting many<br />
of their family members and friends — thus deserving more<br />
systematic attention in its own right.<br />
8