25.02.2015 Views

Constitutionalism and Democratic Governance in Africa: - PULP

Constitutionalism and Democratic Governance in Africa: - PULP

Constitutionalism and Democratic Governance in Africa: - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

24 Chapter 2<br />

amendment <strong>in</strong> the context of legislat<strong>in</strong>g. Therefore, contemporary<br />

constitutional review has been referred to as the process whereby a<br />

constitution is revised with the possibility or <strong>in</strong>tention of chang<strong>in</strong>g it if<br />

considered desirable or necessary, often developed through consultation<br />

that requires participation by stakeholders <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> society, <strong>in</strong><br />

order to bestow legitimacy on the process <strong>and</strong> thus on the actual<br />

Constitution. 42 It is a process that may culm<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>in</strong> a completely revised<br />

constitution or one that is amended to make its orig<strong>in</strong>al form<br />

unrecognisable. However, a more appropriate term for this form of<br />

constitutional review is constitutional reform. The term constitutional<br />

reform has become commonplace when referr<strong>in</strong>g to the process of<br />

constitutional review, analysis, revision, amendment, <strong>and</strong> adoption of a<br />

new constitution. Hence, review, as an appraisal or evaluation, is an<br />

<strong>in</strong>herent part of the constitutional review process but is only one<br />

component <strong>in</strong> constitutional reform. 43 Hence, <strong>in</strong> constitutional reform<br />

there is often an <strong>in</strong>evitable process of constitution-mak<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

4 Constitution-mak<strong>in</strong>g vis à vis constitutionalism<br />

<strong>in</strong> Tanzania: How far has it come?<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Shivji constitution-mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>cludes both amend<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g constitution as well as mak<strong>in</strong>g new constitutions, but he concedes<br />

that the term is often used to refer to mak<strong>in</strong>g of new constitutions only. 44<br />

The process of constitution-mak<strong>in</strong>g is central <strong>in</strong> a democratic political<br />

system because it is from the constitution that the rulers claim to derive<br />

their authority <strong>and</strong> legitimacy. This claim cannot hold if the process of<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g a constitution did not <strong>in</strong>volve the people. 45 It is significant that any<br />

constitution should be legitimate. Balk<strong>in</strong> puts it that legitimacy means<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g more than mere legal validity <strong>in</strong> a positivist sense, <strong>and</strong><br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g less than complete justice. Contemporary constitution-mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or constitutional reform dem<strong>and</strong>s that the process is given as much<br />

importance as the substance or content of the constitution. 46 Popular,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusive, participatory <strong>and</strong> democratic are all key aspects of a successful<br />

process that bestows both legitimacy <strong>and</strong> credibility on the supreme law of<br />

the country. This k<strong>in</strong>d of process contributes to mak<strong>in</strong>g the constitution a<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g document by tak<strong>in</strong>g it to the people so that they are <strong>in</strong> a position not<br />

42 L Oliver Constitutional review <strong>and</strong> reform <strong>and</strong> the adherence to democratic pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>in</strong><br />

constitutions <strong>in</strong> Southern <strong>Africa</strong>n countries (2007) 3. See also BM Nchalla ‘Constitutional<br />

review <strong>and</strong> reform: A Tanzanian perspective’ Paper presented at a public awareness<br />

sem<strong>in</strong>ar on the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977, organised by<br />

the Makumira University College Law Society, at Tuma<strong>in</strong>i University, Makumira<br />

University College, Arusha, Tanzania, on 20 May 2011 1-2.<br />

43 Oliver (n 42 above) 5.<br />

44 Shivji et al (n 9 above) 47.<br />

45<br />

As above.<br />

46 JM Balk<strong>in</strong> ‘Respect-worthy: Frank Michelman <strong>and</strong> the legitimate constitution’ (2003-<br />

2004) 39 Tulsa Law Review 485 486.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!