HKU-Landscape-Annual-2013-14
HKU-Landscape-Annual-2013-14
HKU-Landscape-Annual-2013-14
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BA(LS)<br />
ARCH2044<br />
<strong>Landscape</strong> Design<br />
Studio 3<br />
Instructors:<br />
Vincci Mak,<br />
Yin Lun Chan<br />
<strong>Landscape</strong> Design<br />
Studio 3<br />
This studio aimed to develop students’ ability to research,<br />
analyse, conceptualise and present integrated and meaningful<br />
designs for site-scale landscape projects. With an enlargement<br />
of the scale of a project comes an increased focus on site<br />
planning and the integration of multiple factors which shape<br />
our physical landscapes, including ecology, hydrology, and<br />
climate, with special attention being paid to biophysical<br />
characteristics of the site.<br />
In this studio, students were first given a short exercise in<br />
the study of geomorphology to examine how and why certain<br />
physical landscapes are formed. This aimed to give students an<br />
understanding of how natural processes shape the biophysical<br />
form of our environment.<br />
Then, students undertook a precedent study exercise, in<br />
which examples of built design projects that exemplify an<br />
appreciation for, respect of, and integration with natural<br />
physical landscapes were closely studied as a reference for<br />
students’ own design projects later in the semester.<br />
After the first two preparatory exercises, students were<br />
introduced to the prescribed project site, programs, and<br />
design conditions, and launched into the design exercise phase<br />
of the studio. This phase started with a site analysis exercise<br />
that, first, focused on understanding of the geography, geological<br />
formation, climatic and ecological conditions of the site.<br />
Site and Context<br />
In the subsequent site planning stage, students were asked<br />
to design a site layout according to their findings from the<br />
site analysis exercise. At midterm reviews, they presented a<br />
comprehensive site layout, demonstrating thoughtful grading/<br />
land-forming of the site’s topography, a logical positioning<br />
of building massings that responds to the climatic and<br />
other natural conditions of the site, a sound hierarchy of<br />
programming sequences and flows of circulation.<br />
The final stage of site design zoomed in in scale to further<br />
verify if the site layout made sense at a human-scale level.<br />
The articulations and aesthetics of the space were further<br />
investigated and refined, not only to fit the pragmatic needs of<br />
the programmes/functions, but also to bring a transcendent/<br />
inspiring spatial experience, allowing users to appreciate<br />
the environment through inhabiting the project space.<br />
Also especially emphasised was the question of how, at a<br />
human-scale level, designed spaces might facilitate the site’s<br />
biophysical conditions and aesthetic qualities.<br />
1<br />
Monique<br />
Hiu Yan WONG<br />
2<br />
Olive<br />
Lok Yan WONG<br />
82 83<br />
1<br />
2