01.03.2015 Views

Final Report Report No.: 1 Program No.: WAT-CH-0001 Program ...

Final Report Report No.: 1 Program No.: WAT-CH-0001 Program ...

Final Report Report No.: 1 Program No.: WAT-CH-0001 Program ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Report</strong> <strong>No</strong>.: 1<br />

significant figure of the robust standard deviation and of the equivalent figure in the robust<br />

average.<br />

6-3- Standard deviation for proficiency assessment (SDPA)<br />

The standard deviation used to assess the proficiency of participants in this round of scheme<br />

is derived from the results reported by the participants in the round Two methods have been<br />

used for determination of SDPA as follows:<br />

Method 1: Robust standard deviation (s*)<br />

The standard deviation is the robust standard deviation of the results (s*) reported by all the<br />

participants, calculated using the algorithm in 6-2.<br />

Method 2: IQR<br />

The standard deviation is the interquartile range (IQR). IQR is a measure of the variability of the<br />

results. It is equal to the interquartile range (IQR) multiplied by a correction factor of 0.7413,<br />

which makes it comparable to a standard deviation. The interquartile range is the difference<br />

between the lower and upper quartiles. The lower quartile (Q1) is the value below which, as<br />

near as possible, a quarter of the results lie. Similarly the upper quartile (Q3) is the value above<br />

which a quarter of the results lie. The IQR = Q3 – Q1 and the normalised IQR = IQR × 0.7413.<br />

6-4- Measurement uncertainty of the assigned value (u x )<br />

The standard uncertainty of the assigned value X is estimated as:<br />

Where p is the number of participants.<br />

6-5- Purpose of performance scoring<br />

Once the assigned value for the parameters under test has been established, participant<br />

laboratories are assessed on the difference between their result and the assigned value, with<br />

this difference being represented by a performance score, normally the z-score. The<br />

advantages of a z-score are:<br />

- Results can be expressed in a form that is relatively easy to interpret and understand<br />

- Results can be summarized in graphical or tabular form to depict overall performance<br />

- A performance score allows participants to directly compare their own result with others<br />

- If consistent statistical values are applied, a performance score enables participants to<br />

monitor and trend their own performance over time.<br />

6-6- z-scores<br />

Z-score of the participants is calculated using the following formula:<br />

Page 9 of 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!