SAF-RC- 107 100-H Remaining Sites Burial Grounds ... - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TestAmerica THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING Data Review Checklist RADIOCHEmisTrRY Second Level Review Batch Number: 7 IDI? Review Item Yes () No (4) NA (1 A. Samplc Analysis 1. Are the sample yields within acceptance criteria? ______ 2. Is the sample Minimum Detectable Activity < the Contract Detection Limit? 3. Are the correct isotopes reported? B. QC Samples 1. Is the Minimum Detectable Activity for the blank result < the Contract Detection Limit? 2. Does the blank result meet the Contract criteria? 3. Is the blank result < the Contract Detection Limit? 4. Is the blank result > the Contract Detection Limit but the sample result < the Contract Detection Limit? 5. Is the LCS recovery within contract acceptance criteria? 1 _____ _____ 6. Is the LCS Minimum Detectable Activity Detection Limit? the Contract 7. Do the MS/MSD results and yields meet acceptance criteria? 8. Do the duplicate sample results and yields meet acceptance criteria?______________ C. Other I . Are all Non-conformances included and noted? 2. Ar-e all required forms filled out? 3. Was the correct methodology used? 4. Was transcription checked? _____ 5. Were all calculations checked at a minimum frequency? _____ _____ _____ 6. Were units checked? Comments on any "No" response:______________ ______________ Second Level Revi . -J aDate: U j.C LS-038B, Rev. 10, 9/07 TestAmnerica Page 31 of 64
TestAmerica Data Review/Verification Checklist 6/6/2010 11:49:14 AM .9 O~[ IO~E'A hTN RADIOCHEMISTRY, First Level Review Lot No., Due Date: J0E140464; 06/04/2010 9Il11ent, <strong>Site</strong>: 127642; SOON063AO0 HANFORD QqCpatch No., Method Test: 0137193; RSRTOT SrTot by GPO SDG, Matrix: J00790; SOIL 1.1 Is the I0CC page complete; Includes all applicable analysis, dates, SOP numbers, end revisions? Ye No N/A ~2 b QC'.tc 1 o he Su m r/ eald R prsicueacluated result for each sample listed on the C Batch Sheet' No N/A 2. 2 A re t he C a ppropriate for the an alys Is in clud ed in the batch? Ye No N/A 12.3 Is the Analytical Batch-Worksheet-co-mplete;-Includes-asappropriate, volumes, count imes, eOtc? Y No N/A 2.4 Does the Worksheets include a Tracer Vial label for each sample? Yp No N/A T. 11 Istebakrsls yield, and MDA within contract limits? Y.o / 3 Is the LiCS result, yield, and MBIA within contract limits? -Ye No N/A Ae ti jk MS/MISD results, yields, and VIDA within contract limits? Yes No dupicae esutyields, and MVDAs within contract limits? N / ". bi Lj . .du lc t re u t Y N o N / 1,5 Are the sample yields and MDi within contract limnits? Yeq No N/A 4,Were results calculated in the correct units? Y No N/A ;J%:1 Lv" ithr:i ... .. 4-.2 Were analysis volumes entered correctly? Y No N/A 4.3 Were Yields entered correctly? Yes No 4.4 We're spectr'a reviewed/me et c"ontract-ual requirements?- Yes No 4,5 Were raw counts reviewed for anornalies? Y No N/A --------------- ... 8-- 5.1. Are -all nonconformanc'es incliuded ~and noted? Yes No S.-r-lrqird forms filled out? Y No N/A SWE.~the correct methodology used? Y 7 No N/A SW~as ranscrlptlon checked? Y No N/A calculations checked at a minimum frequency? Y No N/A .0r ~ieksheet entries complete and correct? Y No N/A .0 Commnents on any No response:- I edtAmfer~ca Richi and AS PH 0AIGv4 8.40Oae TestAmerica Page 32 of 64 Pg
Page 1 and 2: SAF-RC- 107 100-H Remaining Sites B
Page 3 and 4: THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING
Page 5 and 6: Washington Closure Hanford June 17,
Page 7 and 8: ~ ~ ~ ~ enr Definfi itions _ ______
Page 9 and 10: Richland Old Richland Isotope SOP I
Page 11 and 12: Sample Results Summary Date: 17-Jun
Page 13 and 14: Sample Results Summary Date: 17-Jun
Page 15 and 16: 0 U) CCU N- 0~ 0 (D (9 -. aD Q ( C)
Page 17 and 18: C 0U W W LIi W W LU w Lii Lii ( D 0
Page 19 and 20: U) 00 LU Lu LiU LU LLU [U LI [In- 0
Page 21 and 22: - rr r - (Y C L w LUl LU U LU Lu LU
Page 23 and 24: 7 L; l Z; C> L;( ( I -LU LUJ LU LUJ
Page 25 and 26: 00C o O C . >) C) C N 04 - N 000 C'
Page 27 and 28: C7) z Cl) J L ui LU LUJ 0 (D ( tco
Page 29 and 30: I o~~~ (/ 0 (3 r- 'I C C C CL CL CL
Page 31: TestAmerica Data Review/Verificatio
Page 35 and 36: TestAm erica Data Review/Verificati
Page 37 and 38: Clouseau TestAmerica Nonconformance
Page 39 and 40: TestAmerica THE LEADER IN ENVIRONME
Page 45 and 46: N- 1 ItAm 0 00 - ,..C4 TetIerc Pae4
Page 47 and 48: TestAmerica TH7L7ER IN ENVIRONMENTA
Page 49 and 50: E 0 C) 0 () t C) 0 0 0 in u 0 .-4 -
Page 51 and 52: 0)0 ) 0 . C4 cc 0 a) 0 m ~C . 4, C
Page 53 and 54: 13/6/2010 11:48:21 AM 1000 Fraction
Page 55 and 56: 0 63 6) r 0 C>0 U ))I a . ((4 ( C)3
Page 57: 00.0 0 U) qu0)0 E co L E E 0 E) COC
Page 60 and 61: E 00 0 0 00 E K '0 C.C co w)U U I U
Page 62 and 63: g /1/2010 11:53:47 AM ICOC Fraction
Page 64 and 65: 0 . 0 _ a. _ 0Z5l qf CC EE L)Q CC a
Page 66 and 67: ANALYTICAL REPORT Job Number: 280-3
Page 68 and 69: CASE NARRATIVE Client: Washington C
Page 70 and 71: DATA REPORTING QUALIFIERS Client: W
Page 72 and 73: METHOD SUMMARY Client: Washington C
Page 74 and 75: SAMPLE SUMMARY Client: Washington C
Page 76 and 77: Analytical Data Client. Washington
Page 78 and 79: Analytical Data Client: Washington
Page 80 and 81: Analytical Data Client: Washington
Page 82 and 83:
Analytical Data Client: Washington
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Client: Washington Closure Hanford
Page 88 and 89:
Analytical Data Client: W~ashington
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
TestAmerica Denver QUALITY CONTROL
Page 98 and 99:
Quality Control Results Client: Was
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Client: Washington Closure Hanford
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
1 Z, $ v)l - ' ' CDC z 0 o4 E I _ \
Page 122 and 123:
TestAmerica THE LEAE NEVIOMENTAL. T
show all

SAF-RC- 107 100-H Remaining Sites Burial Grounds ... - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?