06.03.2015 Views

DoD Responses to Transnational Threats - The Black Vault

DoD Responses to Transnational Threats - The Black Vault

DoD Responses to Transnational Threats - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Together, these principles form the structure <strong>to</strong> help position <strong>DoD</strong> <strong>to</strong> meet its<br />

responsibilities in dealing with transnational threats of <strong>to</strong>day and the future. Notably, the task<br />

force holds that <strong>DoD</strong> can respond without a change <strong>to</strong> national roles and missions and without<br />

change in its own organization. <strong>The</strong> discussion which follows expands on these six elements.<br />

A Major <strong>DoD</strong> Mission<br />

Organizing a <strong>DoD</strong> Response<br />

Examples of the transnational threat are familiar <strong>to</strong> us all. Events such as the 1983 attack on<br />

the US Marine Corps barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, and the 1996 bombing of Khobar Towers in<br />

Saudi Arabia are recent cases of significant consequence. <strong>The</strong> task force believes that the<br />

transnational threat will escalate in the future and be increasingly characterized by planned<br />

campaigns designed <strong>to</strong> inflict maximum damage and casualties.<br />

US presence, policies, and leadership must remain a major stabilizing force in the world, and<br />

as such, overseas US military operations will continue <strong>to</strong> be the norm. <strong>The</strong> Department of<br />

Defense must recognize and deal with an escalating and more dangerous threat environment and<br />

its impact on missions overseas as well as within the United States. While the task force focused<br />

on <strong>DoD</strong> responsibilities, the national leadership – <strong>to</strong> include the President – will need <strong>to</strong> provide<br />

vigorous leadership in preparing for this set of threats.<br />

<strong>The</strong> increased <strong>DoD</strong> attention needs <strong>to</strong> include transnational threats in departmental guidance<br />

and strategy, in the planning and budgeting processes, and in training and exercises. This is not a<br />

new mission for <strong>DoD</strong>, but the capabilities and motives of these transnational adversaries raise the<br />

challenge <strong>to</strong> a far higher level.<br />

Existing Structures and Processes<br />

<strong>The</strong> transnational threat challenge requires a “three-tiered” response: global, regional, and<br />

force level. This response should capitalize on the parallelism between domestic preparedness,<br />

global force protection, force projection, and a major theater war. <strong>The</strong>re is strong synergy<br />

between the demands of each. A robust force protection capability is critical <strong>to</strong> meet US security<br />

needs and maintain the nation’s ability <strong>to</strong> project its forces abroad. <strong>The</strong> requirements,<br />

procedures, and technology for protecting military facilities against attacks by transnational<br />

forces have much in common with protecting civilian facilities in metropolitan areas. Thus, the<br />

United States can leverage <strong>DoD</strong> capabilities and expertise for both force protection and <strong>to</strong><br />

contribute more effectively <strong>to</strong> civil protection.<br />

Force protection is a major responsibility for the Department of Defense, for its forces at<br />

home and abroad. <strong>The</strong> Department has taken steps <strong>to</strong> improve its force protection programs as<br />

the new threat emerged. <strong>DoD</strong> deserves high marks for these efforts <strong>to</strong> date, but there is still much<br />

x

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!