DoD Responses to Transnational Threats - The Black Vault
DoD Responses to Transnational Threats - The Black Vault
DoD Responses to Transnational Threats - The Black Vault
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
oversight assigned <strong>to</strong> the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy and <strong>to</strong> the Under Secretary of<br />
Defense for Acquisition and Technology, respectively. At the operational level, the regional<br />
warfighting Commanders-in-Chief are given responsibility for both crisis management and<br />
consequence management. Specifically SOCOM and USACOM are assigned <strong>to</strong> crisis<br />
management; USACOM is assigned <strong>to</strong> consequence management within the continental United<br />
States and the appropriate regional commanders are responsible in cases occurring abroad.<br />
Function Policy Oversight Operations Operational &<br />
Systems<br />
Architectures<br />
Nuclear, Chemical<br />
Warfare,<br />
Biological<br />
Warfare, and<br />
Conventional<br />
<strong>Threats</strong><br />
Information<br />
Warfare <strong>Threats</strong><br />
USD (P)<br />
SOCOM and USACOM<br />
for crisis management<br />
Area CINCs for<br />
consequence<br />
management; USACOM<br />
for CONUS<br />
JCS Task Force and<br />
USD (A&T)<br />
R&D Oversight<br />
USD (A&T) Appropriate CINC DDR&E<br />
Figure 12. Example of Ownership Within <strong>DoD</strong><br />
DDR&E, supported<br />
by ASD (SO/LIC) for<br />
crisis management<br />
and<br />
USD (A&T) for<br />
consequence<br />
management<br />
<strong>The</strong> task force proposes a temporary Joint Task Force, within the Joint Chiefs of Staff<br />
organization, coupled with a team assigned by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition<br />
and Technology, <strong>to</strong> design operational and systems architectures. Research and development<br />
oversight is broadly assigned <strong>to</strong> the Direc<strong>to</strong>r, Defense Research and Engineering, and supported<br />
by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict in the<br />
area of crisis management, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and<br />
Technology in the area of consequence management.<br />
Recommendation: No new organizations.<br />
⇒ <strong>The</strong> Secretary of Defense must assign responsibility for transnational missions with greater clarity<br />
than exists <strong>to</strong>day.<br />
⇒ <strong>The</strong> Secretary of Defense must clarify and assign, <strong>to</strong> a single policy office, responsibilities for<br />
counterterrorism, counterproliferation, transnational threats, and infrastructure protection.<br />
⇒ <strong>The</strong> Secretary also must assign responsibilities for the National Guard in the area of civil<br />
training, exercises, consequence management, deterrence, and regional combatant commander<br />
consequence management support in chemical and biological warfare incidents.<br />
⇒ <strong>The</strong> Chairman of the Joint Chiefs must assign responsibilities for<br />
◊ Updating all operational plans <strong>to</strong> include transnational threat contingency planning, crisis<br />
response and consequence management responsibilities<br />
◊ Budgeting by the Services for new transnational threat requirements derived from Joint Task<br />
Force outputs in the program period beginning in fiscal year 1999<br />
⇒ <strong>DoD</strong> must also work cooperatively with the Department of Energy <strong>to</strong> develop an expanded<br />
memorandum of understanding and research and development plan <strong>to</strong> address transnational<br />
threats.<br />
31