2012 wintec annual report
2012 wintec annual report
2012 wintec annual report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
WINTEC ANNUAL<br />
REPORT <strong>2012</strong><br />
95<br />
Indicator(s) Audited 2011<br />
Outcome<br />
Target <strong>2012</strong><br />
Outcome<br />
Comment<br />
Depreciation ($m) 6.0 7.0 6.4 Timing of capital spend has resulted<br />
in a lower depreciation spend.<br />
Total expenditure ($m) 77.9 80.5 81.6 Mainly due to the addition of expenses related<br />
to additional revenues received that were not<br />
confirmed at the time the budget was set.<br />
Depreciation as<br />
a percentage of<br />
expenditure<br />
7.7% 8.7% 7.8% Lower due to increased expenditure<br />
compared to budget as well as a lower<br />
depreciation charge than budget.<br />
Debt/Equity 6.7% 11.0% 5.9% Driven by higher equity through<br />
increase in valuations.<br />
Net cashflow from<br />
114% 111% + 115% Above target due to positive cashflow.<br />
operations<br />
Liquid assets 8.2% 12% 15.6% Timing in cash receipts from land sales and<br />
corresponding reduction of overdraft facility<br />
has resulted in higher liquid assets.<br />
Debt cover 0.7x 1.8x or less 0.7x Lower term debt and reduction<br />
in overdraft facility.<br />
Interest cover 7.8x 3x or more 6.2x Lower borrowing and interest rates.<br />
Working capital ratio 0.48:1 0.59:1 0.54:1 Primarily driven by cash receipts from land<br />
sales and reduction in overdraft facility.<br />
Ratio excludes land held for resale.<br />
Maximum term<br />
borrowing ($m)<br />
Maximum aggregate<br />
borrowing ($m)<br />
Personnel as a<br />
% of revenue<br />
Personnel as a %<br />
of expenditure<br />
Full time equivalent<br />
(FTE)<br />
Capital Asset<br />
Management System<br />
(CAMS) performance<br />
8.0 14.0 7.2 Lower debt levels due to proceeds<br />
received from asset sales.<br />
13.0 11.4 7.3 Primarily driven by cash receipts from land<br />
sales and reduction of overdraft facility.<br />
54.7% 55.5% 52.6% Represents the increased efficiency of<br />
delivery (average class size efficiencies) as the<br />
proportional increase in revenue is greater<br />
than the proportional cost of delivery.<br />
57.1% 57.6% 55.3%<br />
$69,617 $71,528 $72,542 Higher average costs associated with<br />
wage negotiations and wage pressure on<br />
replacement staff starting salaries.<br />
All CAMs attributes<br />
are rated at<br />
moderate or above<br />
by December <strong>2012</strong><br />
85% of attributes<br />
self-rated<br />
as moderate<br />
or better<br />
All but one attribute (asset management<br />
systems) rated as moderate or better. As part<br />
of the on-going improvements to our asset<br />
management systems, all asset management<br />
plans and the self-assessment have been<br />
completed and externally reviewed by SPM.<br />
The new asset system implementation is<br />
underway and will be in place by July 2013.<br />
STATEMENT OF SERVICE PERFORMANCE<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9<br />
10