07.03.2015 Views

2012 wintec annual report

2012 wintec annual report

2012 wintec annual report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WINTEC ANNUAL<br />

REPORT <strong>2012</strong><br />

95<br />

Indicator(s) Audited 2011<br />

Outcome<br />

Target <strong>2012</strong><br />

Outcome<br />

Comment<br />

Depreciation ($m) 6.0 7.0 6.4 Timing of capital spend has resulted<br />

in a lower depreciation spend.<br />

Total expenditure ($m) 77.9 80.5 81.6 Mainly due to the addition of expenses related<br />

to additional revenues received that were not<br />

confirmed at the time the budget was set.<br />

Depreciation as<br />

a percentage of<br />

expenditure<br />

7.7% 8.7% 7.8% Lower due to increased expenditure<br />

compared to budget as well as a lower<br />

depreciation charge than budget.<br />

Debt/Equity 6.7% 11.0% 5.9% Driven by higher equity through<br />

increase in valuations.<br />

Net cashflow from<br />

114% 111% + 115% Above target due to positive cashflow.<br />

operations<br />

Liquid assets 8.2% 12% 15.6% Timing in cash receipts from land sales and<br />

corresponding reduction of overdraft facility<br />

has resulted in higher liquid assets.<br />

Debt cover 0.7x 1.8x or less 0.7x Lower term debt and reduction<br />

in overdraft facility.<br />

Interest cover 7.8x 3x or more 6.2x Lower borrowing and interest rates.<br />

Working capital ratio 0.48:1 0.59:1 0.54:1 Primarily driven by cash receipts from land<br />

sales and reduction in overdraft facility.<br />

Ratio excludes land held for resale.<br />

Maximum term<br />

borrowing ($m)<br />

Maximum aggregate<br />

borrowing ($m)<br />

Personnel as a<br />

% of revenue<br />

Personnel as a %<br />

of expenditure<br />

Full time equivalent<br />

(FTE)<br />

Capital Asset<br />

Management System<br />

(CAMS) performance<br />

8.0 14.0 7.2 Lower debt levels due to proceeds<br />

received from asset sales.<br />

13.0 11.4 7.3 Primarily driven by cash receipts from land<br />

sales and reduction of overdraft facility.<br />

54.7% 55.5% 52.6% Represents the increased efficiency of<br />

delivery (average class size efficiencies) as the<br />

proportional increase in revenue is greater<br />

than the proportional cost of delivery.<br />

57.1% 57.6% 55.3%<br />

$69,617 $71,528 $72,542 Higher average costs associated with<br />

wage negotiations and wage pressure on<br />

replacement staff starting salaries.<br />

All CAMs attributes<br />

are rated at<br />

moderate or above<br />

by December <strong>2012</strong><br />

85% of attributes<br />

self-rated<br />

as moderate<br />

or better<br />

All but one attribute (asset management<br />

systems) rated as moderate or better. As part<br />

of the on-going improvements to our asset<br />

management systems, all asset management<br />

plans and the self-assessment have been<br />

completed and externally reviewed by SPM.<br />

The new asset system implementation is<br />

underway and will be in place by July 2013.<br />

STATEMENT OF SERVICE PERFORMANCE<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!