15.03.2015 Views

Research Highlights of the CIMMYT Wheat Program 1999-2000

Research Highlights of the CIMMYT Wheat Program 1999-2000

Research Highlights of the CIMMYT Wheat Program 1999-2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The high cost <strong>of</strong> hybrid seed is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major<br />

limiting factors for <strong>the</strong> commercialization <strong>of</strong> hybrid<br />

wheat. Experience at <strong>CIMMYT</strong> shows that for<br />

triticale, costs <strong>of</strong> hybrid seed production are<br />

substantially lower when compared with wheat<br />

due to high, close-to-normal seed set in hybrid<br />

production plots. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, fewer male<br />

pollinator rows need to be planted. CMS hybrids<br />

show clear advantages over CHA hybrids in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> seed production costs. Production <strong>of</strong> CHA<br />

hybrids does involve substantial costs due to<br />

determining <strong>the</strong> dosis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gametocide,<br />

monitoring seed production fields to optimize <strong>the</strong><br />

application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chemical hybridizing agent,<br />

gametocide product costs, and royalties for <strong>the</strong><br />

gametocide. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, male pollinators can be<br />

blended with CMS females and planted as mixture<br />

for hybrid seed production to fur<strong>the</strong>r reduce costs.<br />

This practice is common in hybrid rye production<br />

in Europe.<br />

Lack <strong>of</strong> uniformity in CMS hybrids and a certain<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> male in hybrid seed are likely<br />

irrelevant, e.g., for forage and grazing hybrids.<br />

Moreover, forage/grazing CMS hybrids do not<br />

require fertility restoration in <strong>the</strong> hybrid; hence,<br />

hybrid development is less complicated and costly.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> developing CMS<br />

hybrids are much higher than for developing CHA<br />

hybrids, and crop improvement is complicated and<br />

requires a considerable amount <strong>of</strong> resources.<br />

Molecular markers for restorer/non-restorer genes<br />

could dramatically reduce <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> developing<br />

CMS hybrids (> 75%).<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!