15.03.2015 Views

Research Highlights of the CIMMYT Wheat Program 1999-2000

Research Highlights of the CIMMYT Wheat Program 1999-2000

Research Highlights of the CIMMYT Wheat Program 1999-2000

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>the</strong> variation in yield (Figure 2). O<strong>the</strong>r work has<br />

demonstrated <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> using <strong>the</strong> trait in<br />

selection nurseries to predict performance <strong>of</strong><br />

advanced lines in heat stressed target environments<br />

(Reynolds et al., 1997, 1998). When CTD was<br />

compared with o<strong>the</strong>r potential selection traits (grain<br />

number, biomass, phenological data, and yield)<br />

measured in <strong>the</strong> selection environment, none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r traits showed a greater association with<br />

performance in <strong>the</strong> target environment than CTD.<br />

The trait was also studied in three populations <strong>of</strong><br />

homozygous sister lines under drought stress. CTD<br />

showed a highly significant association with yield<br />

under drought when measured pre-an<strong>the</strong>sis in all<br />

populations. CTD measured during grainfilling<br />

tended to show a better association when measured<br />

in <strong>the</strong> morning (Table 3).<br />

In addition to yield, breeding objectives must take<br />

into account multiple factors, such as disease<br />

tolerance and phenology. Therefore, it would be<br />

logical when incorporating CTD into a selection<br />

protocol, to select for relatively genetically simple<br />

traits such as agronomic type and disease resistance<br />

in <strong>the</strong> earliest generations (e.g., F 2<br />

-F 3<br />

). Selection for<br />

CTD could be employed in subsequent generations,<br />

when more loci are homozygous, and perhaps in<br />

CTD ( o C)<br />

6.0<br />

5.5<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

4.0<br />

y= 0.0004x + 3.0711<br />

r 2 = 0.44<br />

3.5<br />

2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 5,500 6,000 6,500<br />

Yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

Figure 2. Relationship between canopy temperature<br />

depression (CTD) measured during grainfilling and yield <strong>of</strong><br />

random derived F 5:8<br />

sister lines from <strong>the</strong> spring wheat cross<br />

Seri-82 x SieteCerros-66, Ciudad Obregon, Sonora, Mexico,<br />

1996 - 1997.<br />

Source: Reynolds et al., <strong>1999</strong>.<br />

preliminary yield trials. (Table 4). The possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

combining selection for both CTD (on bulks) and<br />

stomatal conductance (on individual plants) is<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r interesting possibility. In recent work at<br />

<strong>CIMMYT</strong> (Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al., <strong>2000</strong>),<br />

stomatal conductance was measured on individual<br />

plants in F 2:5<br />

bulks and showed significant<br />

phenotypic and genetic correlation with yield <strong>of</strong> F 5:7<br />

lines.<br />

Aerial infrared imagery. CTD can be estimated<br />

remotely using aerial IR imagery. Work conducted<br />

in Ciudad Obregon, Sonora, Mexico, showed that<br />

aerial IR images had sufficient resolution to detect<br />

CTD differences on relatively small yield plots (1.6<br />

m wide). Data were collected using an IR radiation<br />

Table 3. Correlation between CTD measured pre-heading and<br />

during grainfilling on 25 recombinant inbred lines <strong>of</strong> Seri 82/<br />

Baviacora 92, at different times <strong>of</strong> day, at two environments<br />

in Mexico, <strong>1999</strong>-<strong>2000</strong>.<br />

Correlation with yield<br />

Trait C. Obregon (810) Tlaltizapan<br />

CTD mean 0.85** 0.84**<br />

CTD AM prehead 0.82** 0.79**<br />

CTD AM grainfill 0.79** 0.68**<br />

CTD PM prehead 0.85** 0.72**<br />

CTD PM grainfill 0.37 0.06<br />

Days to maturity 0.29 -0.22<br />

** Statistical significance at P>0.01.<br />

Table 4. Theoretical scheme for incorporating physiological<br />

selection criteria into a conventional breeding progam<br />

showing different alternatives for when physiological traits<br />

could be measured, depending on resources available.<br />

Breeding generation when selection to be conducted<br />

Trait All generations F3 F4-F6_ PYTs/Advanced lines<br />

Simple traits<br />

Disease<br />

visual<br />

Height<br />

visual<br />

Maturity<br />

visual<br />

Canopy type<br />

visual<br />

Complex traits<br />

Yield visual yield plots<br />

CTD small plots yield plots<br />

Porometry plants small plots yield plots<br />

Chlorophyll plants small plots *<br />

Spectral reflectance small plots yield plots<br />

* Chlorophyll is sufficiently stable with respect to interaction with environment for<br />

additional measurements not to be necessary.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!