Public Consultation Toolkit - Civil Service College
Public Consultation Toolkit - Civil Service College
Public Consultation Toolkit - Civil Service College
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Consultation</strong> <strong>Toolkit</strong> 21 22 <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Consultation</strong> <strong>Toolkit</strong><br />
Case 6:<br />
Master plan for Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve<br />
Agency/country:<br />
5.3. Step 3: Anticipate obstacles and challenges<br />
Before launching the public consultation exercise, public officers need to think through the<br />
potential challenges and pitfalls that may arise during and after the exercise. Mitigating<br />
strategies and contingency plans need to be developed to handle these situations.<br />
The following are some commonly faced challenges and examples of mitigating strategies:<br />
1. Voluminous and diverse views<br />
Policies/initiatives which affect the society at large (e.g., primary education curriculum policies)<br />
or are controversial in nature (e.g., amendment to the Penal Code) tend to attract voluminous<br />
feedback which may be differing and diverse, and therefore, sometimes hard to manage.<br />
Officers should adopt a systematic approach to identify and deal with the most pressing and<br />
most common concerns among the stakeholders. Table 5-3 suggests a simple way for officers to<br />
categorise the feedback received.<br />
• National Parks Board (NParks), Singapore<br />
Background:<br />
• The objective of the consultation exercise was to seek feedback on the masterplan for the<br />
development of the Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve.<br />
• With lessons learnt from Chek Jawa, which attracted voluminous public feedback, NParks<br />
decided to engage interest groups early in the consultation process.<br />
<strong>Consultation</strong> Process:<br />
• NParks involved the key stakeholders and interest groups at the early stages of the<br />
development plan.<br />
• Working groups were formed and meetings were held quarterly to discuss issues and<br />
concerns.<br />
• Stakeholders had open discussions with NParks and their input were directly included in the<br />
master plan for development.<br />
Demands by stakeholders<br />
directly affected<br />
Prioritisation of feedback<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
Common areas of concern 1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
Minority requirements 1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
Table 5-3: Categorising feedback received<br />
If voluminous feedback is expected on an issue, one possible<br />
mitigating strategy is to start with targeted engagement of key<br />
stakeholders before consulting the wider populace. This will<br />
allow agencies to identify key area of concerns and controversy<br />
and develop strategies or responses before a large-scale<br />
consultation is launched.<br />
Tips for effectiveness<br />
For a situation where the<br />
feedback is voluminous,<br />
agencies can group<br />
feedback into broader<br />
categories based on<br />
common areas of concern.<br />
This allows the agencies<br />
to have a comprehensive<br />
assessment of the situation<br />
without being bogged<br />
down by the volume.<br />
This also helps the<br />
agencies to close the loop<br />
effectively (Step 8) as it<br />
will ensure that all key<br />
areas of concern had been<br />
considered.<br />
Outcomes:<br />
• Since the working group played a part in the planning process, they could assist NParks to<br />
address the concerns of the public during the wider consultation.<br />
• The public showed greater acceptance towards the government’s initiative when the nongovernmental<br />
groups showed buy-in towards the policy as well.<br />
Learning points:<br />
• For issues which could attract voluminous feedback, involving targeted stakeholders early<br />
helps to facilitate the consultation process with the wider populace.