31.03.2015 Views

Golniški simpozij 2011 Zbornik povzetkov

Golniški simpozij 2011 Zbornik povzetkov

Golniški simpozij 2011 Zbornik povzetkov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comprehensive medication history:<br />

the need for the implementation<br />

of medication reconciliation processes<br />

Lea Knez 1 , Renata Reæonja 1,2 , Stanislav Øuøkoviœ 1 , Mitja Koønik 1 , Aleø Mrhar 2<br />

1<br />

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana<br />

2<br />

University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik<br />

Background<br />

Comprehensive medication history (CMH) is of outmost importance for patient evaluation and prescription<br />

of drug treatment upon hospital admission. The aim of this study was to assess the need<br />

for the implementation of medication reconciliation processes into clinical practice.<br />

Method<br />

Patients admitted to a teaching hospital in Slovenia were randomly selected and included in the<br />

study. For every patient a CMH was obtained by a research pharmacist using different sources of information.<br />

Next, medication history in the hospital medical record was reviewed. Prescription of medicines<br />

was assessed for completeness of information and discrepancies between both medication<br />

histories were recorded and classified.<br />

Results<br />

Overall, 108 patients with a median age of 73 years were included. The research pharmacist recorded<br />

the use of 651 medicines, of which 94.9% provided all relevant details for drug identification and administration.<br />

Less medicines (464) were recorded in the hospital medical record as compared to the<br />

CMH (paired t-test, p>0.001) and only 42.0% of these medicines were evaluated as complete. When<br />

comparing the medication history in the medical record with the CMH, at least one discrepancy was<br />

detected in 72.4% of medicines and was often present in the medication order on the drug chart<br />

(76.2%) and in the discharge letter (69.9%). Discrepancies often arose due to medicine’s omission<br />

(20.9%) and medicine’s commission (6.5%).<br />

Conclusions<br />

The high rate of discrepancies between the recorded drug history and CMH reported in our study<br />

shows the need for implementation of medication reconciliation practices. Pharmacists’ participation<br />

in admission reconciliation, as described in this study, led to more complete and accurate drug<br />

histories. In the study hospital, pharmacist-led CMH have been introduced in a research framework<br />

within which the benefits of this service for the reduction of medication errors and adverse drug<br />

events are being studied against routine practice in a randomised trial.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!