03.04.2015 Views

actcoss text final.indd - ACT Council of Social Service

actcoss text final.indd - ACT Council of Social Service

actcoss text final.indd - ACT Council of Social Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

part 1: introduction<br />

BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY<br />

This paper was developed following discussions with<br />

the Mental Health Community Coalition (MHCC)<br />

on strengthening the community mental health<br />

sector and improving outcomes for those affected<br />

by mental illness. It was agreed that separate papers,<br />

each with a different focus, would be the most<br />

effective and appropriate way <strong>of</strong> exploring key<br />

issues. As a result, the MHCC has developed a paper<br />

with a ‘sector development’ or intra-sectoral focus,<br />

examining organisational and sectoral challenges<br />

and service delivery model options within the<br />

community mental health sector. The <strong>ACT</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Service</strong> (<strong>ACT</strong>COSS) separately embarked<br />

on a paper with a focus on the community mental<br />

health sector in con<strong>text</strong>. This has developed into an<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> current relationships between different<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the Australian Capital Territory (<strong>ACT</strong>)<br />

social service system, community and government,<br />

examining referral links, coordination, cooperation<br />

and collaboration.<br />

This paper begins by outlining the core policy<br />

principles which inform <strong>ACT</strong>COSS’ analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

mental health service delivery systems and policies.<br />

It explores the concept <strong>of</strong> collaboration, its various<br />

forms, and ways in which governments can facilitate<br />

inter-agency collaboration. The relationship between<br />

community mental health services and government is<br />

then considered. Funding, referral and inter-agency<br />

relationships with government departments and<br />

services are analysed. In Part Three, relationships<br />

between the community mental health sector and<br />

other parts <strong>of</strong> the community service sector (for<br />

example, housing, alcohol and drug and Indigenous<br />

services) are explored. In each part <strong>of</strong> the paper,<br />

recommendations are proposed to respond to<br />

identified challenges under each heading.<br />

This policy paper is informed by an extensive survey<br />

<strong>of</strong> relevant academic literature in addition to a<br />

review <strong>of</strong> international, national, state and territory<br />

policy documents and consideration <strong>of</strong> stakeholder<br />

consultative input. Two consultative forums, jointly<br />

facilitated with the MHCC, were held with mental<br />

health community service providers, the first in<br />

November 2006 and the second in February 2007.<br />

<strong>ACT</strong>COSS also facilitated a consumer forum, hosted<br />

by the Mental Health Consumer Network (MHCN),<br />

on 27 February, 2007. In addition, we conducted<br />

individual consultations with some 13 community<br />

sector organisations from across the service sector.<br />

These organisations are all involved in providing<br />

services to mental health consumers, though do not<br />

all provide mental health specific services. A list <strong>of</strong><br />

these services is provided at Appendix A. During the<br />

consultations, participants were asked a series <strong>of</strong><br />

generic questions, included in Appendix B. It should<br />

be noted that consultations engaged with a limited<br />

number <strong>of</strong> organisations from across the service<br />

system. As a result, consultation feedback should not<br />

be taken to represent uniform or agreed positions<br />

across the sector, but rather, trends emerging from<br />

the sample <strong>of</strong> organisations consulted. Similarly,<br />

examples provided <strong>of</strong> partnerships and collaboration<br />

should not be understood to exclude other examples<br />

not highlighted during the consultation process.<br />

THE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SECTOR<br />

IN CONTEXT: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED<br />

SERVICE SYSTEM<br />

<strong>ACT</strong>COSS has long argued that the best outcomes<br />

for service-users can only be secured through an<br />

integrated service system, characterised by mutual<br />

respect, effective referral and information pathways<br />

and a commitment to coordination, cooperation,<br />

and collaboration. In this paper, we have used the<br />

expression ‘no wrong doors’ to describe an approach<br />

to service delivery in which each organisation in the<br />

service system is supported to assist all those who<br />

seek help, either by providing services directly or<br />

referring the individual on to another organisation<br />

able to assist. This paper is premised on an awareness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the social determinants <strong>of</strong> health and reflects an<br />

understanding that both the causes and effects <strong>of</strong><br />

mental illness cross sectoral boundaries. Any reform<br />

<strong>of</strong> mental health services in the <strong>ACT</strong> must therefore<br />

take a systemic and cross-sectoral approach to<br />

be most effective. The community mental health<br />

sector must be seen as part <strong>of</strong> a broader network<br />

<strong>of</strong> community sector services, and a necessary<br />

9 Towards an integrated mental health service system in the <strong>ACT</strong>•June 2007 NO WRONG DOORS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!