03.04.2015 Views

actcoss text final.indd - ACT Council of Social Service

actcoss text final.indd - ACT Council of Social Service

actcoss text final.indd - ACT Council of Social Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part 3: The relationship between the community mental health<br />

sector and other parts <strong>of</strong> the community social service system<br />

Introduction<br />

This Part engages in an analysis <strong>of</strong> current<br />

relationships between the community mental<br />

health sector and other parts <strong>of</strong> the community<br />

sector. In doing so, it explores the impact <strong>of</strong> service<br />

integration, or the lack there<strong>of</strong>, on outcomes for<br />

service users and the community. Analysis is informed<br />

by consultations, in which participants were asked<br />

about the extent to which community services were<br />

coordinated and linked. Several indicators <strong>of</strong> service<br />

linkage were used, including referral and information<br />

sharing networks, joint projects, formal agreements,<br />

case management and coordination. These indicators<br />

formed the basis <strong>of</strong> consultation questions, and<br />

are consistent with those frequently used in<br />

‘collaboration’ literature. 72<br />

It should be noted that the boundaries <strong>of</strong> the<br />

community mental health sector are not fixed, with a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> non-mental health specific organisations<br />

performing functions which fall within the service<br />

range <strong>of</strong> the sector, in addition to functions which<br />

lie outside. For example, a number <strong>of</strong> organisations<br />

provide accommodation services in addition to<br />

mental health services, while others provide a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> social, emotional and wellbeing services<br />

in addition to alcohol and other drug services or<br />

primary health services. Therefore, the expressions<br />

‘sector’ and ‘sub-sector’ in this con<strong>text</strong> should be<br />

understood flexibly. The focus on particular subsectors<br />

is not intended to reflect a belief that service<br />

areas need to be considered discretely. Rather, the<br />

boundaries and transitions between sub-sectors (for<br />

example, between the mental health and the alcohol<br />

and other drug sectors) should ideally be seamless<br />

and the service system well-integrated.<br />

The need for a coordinated<br />

system response<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> mental illness among service users<br />

across the spectrum <strong>of</strong> services was a recurring<br />

theme in consultations. This is reflected in the priority<br />

allocated to mental health in the strategic plans <strong>of</strong><br />

a number <strong>of</strong> non-mental health specific community<br />

sector peak bodies, as informed by their members<br />

(e.g. Youth Coalition, <strong>ACT</strong>COSS). Conversely, mental<br />

health consumers who participated in consultations<br />

indicated that, in addition to mental health services,<br />

they frequently accessed employment services, long<br />

term and crisis accommodation services, community<br />

legal centres (for example, the Welfare Rights and<br />

Legal Centre), free food services, church welfare and<br />

crisis services (e.g. Salvation Army), multicultural and<br />

migrant services and alcohol and drug services. The<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> mental health services was recognised<br />

by all <strong>of</strong> those consulted from across the community<br />

service spectrum. This is consistent with the most<br />

recent Community Sector Survey Report, in which<br />

survey respondents highlighted health services<br />

(including mental health and alcohol and drug<br />

services) as the services most needed by<br />

their clients. 73<br />

Consumers who responded to a recent MHCN<br />

survey indicated that service cooperation and<br />

knowledge about services was a ‘preferred service<br />

response’. They identified ‘consistent service<br />

provision that focuses on maintaining connections’<br />

as a preference. 74 In addition, they responded<br />

that services would be easier to access if ‘good<br />

networks <strong>of</strong> services [were] in place including health<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionals.’ 75 Only 50% <strong>of</strong> respondents indicated<br />

that they had been linked with another service<br />

following their time in inpatient services. 76<br />

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

72 For example, Provan and Sebastian (1998), ‘Networks within networks: <strong>Service</strong> link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness’, Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Management Journal<br />

41: 453-463 at 460, quoted by Dr Rae Walker, Collaboration and Alliances: A Review for Vichealth, September 2000, published by Victorian<br />

Health Promotion Foundation at 17.<br />

73 ACOSS Community Sector Survey 2007 at 87.<br />

74 <strong>ACT</strong> Mental Health Consumer Network, Consumer Experiences <strong>of</strong> Mental Health <strong>Service</strong>s in the <strong>ACT</strong>: Results <strong>of</strong> a survey about consumer experiences <strong>of</strong> mental<br />

health services, January 2007 at 3.<br />

75 Ibid at 5.<br />

76 Ibid at 7.<br />

NO WRONG DOORS Towards an integrated mental health service system in the <strong>ACT</strong>•June 2007<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!