16.11.2012 Views

omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management

omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management

omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

65<br />

Federal Budget 2010-11<br />

Cautious Populism<br />

Pakistan Research<br />

Monday June 7, 2010<br />

<strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

Hamad Aslam<br />

haslam@bmacapital.com<br />

Abdul Shakur<br />

abdul.shakur@bmacapital.com<br />

Nurali Barkatali<br />

nurali.barkatali@bmacapital.com<br />

Sana I. Bawani<br />

sana.iqbal@bmacapital.com<br />

Omar Rafiq<br />

omar.rafiq@bmacapital.com<br />

Muhammad Ali Taufiq<br />

ali.taufiq@bmacapital.com


2<br />

CAUTIOUS POPULISM<br />

BUDGET FY11: NO CHANGE IN FLAVOR<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Touching briefly upon a number of themes, the budget lacked a broad based plan to ensure<br />

growth sustainability. Populist measures were an<strong>no</strong>unced but limited to the fiscal space<br />

available with the government. Incentives extended to promote investment, corporatization<br />

and equity market listing are commendable, <strong>no</strong>netheless.<br />

Wide scale opposition on implementation of Value Added Tax (VAT) forced the government to<br />

defer the decision– thereby defeating the originally envisaged goal of increasing<br />

documentation in the eco<strong>no</strong>my. Our main concern however emanated from the silence<br />

adapted by the policy makers on the lingering power deficit and circular debt.<br />

ECONOMICS: A CAUTIONED APPROACH<br />

In pursuance to keep the eco<strong>no</strong>my on growth track, policy shift has been an<strong>no</strong>unced to<br />

mobilize resources from <strong>no</strong>n development side to capacity building. Deviation from the<br />

planned targets and fiscal slippages remained the key dilemma time and again. All the<br />

budgetary measures, including fiscal consolidation, bridging investment saving gaps and<br />

enhancing potential output through development seem prudent – however implementation of<br />

these targets remains challenging.<br />

The envisaged GDP growth target of 4.5% for FY11 will be widely dependent on recovery<br />

from commodity producing sectors i.e. manufacturing and agriculture; for which power deficit<br />

remains the key challenge. On the revenue side, incremental 100bps increase in GST would<br />

be the supporting factor up till the implementation of VAT. However given its inflationary<br />

impact, inflation target of 9.5% for FY11 seem ambitious to us. On the whole, achievement of<br />

fiscal deficit target of 4% of GDP will require resource utilization and strict adherence to the<br />

an<strong>no</strong>unced austerity measures.<br />

MARKET STRATEGY: GRIST TO THE MILL<br />

Removal of CGT exemption on equity trading may imply short term attrition in trading<br />

volumes. However given that the an<strong>no</strong>uncement was in-line with the consensus achieved in<br />

Feb10 and continues exemption on long term holding; we do <strong>no</strong>t foresee any knee-jerk<br />

reaction on the index. Interplay of global markets may however require an ever closer look.<br />

We thus re-iterate our <strong>safe</strong> investment themes with our KSE100 2010 index target intact at<br />

11,500.<br />

BUDGET IMPACTS AND OUR TAKE<br />

Sector<br />

Budget<br />

Impact<br />

<strong>BMA</strong> Recommendation Top Picks<br />

Commercial Banks Positive MARKETWEIGHT MCB<br />

E&P Neutral MARKETWEIGHT PPL, POL<br />

OMCs Neutral OVERWEIGHT PSO<br />

Power Neutral OVERWEIGHT HUBC<br />

Fertilizer Neutral MARKETWEIGHT ENGRO<br />

Cement Neutral OVERWEIGHT ACPL<br />

Textile Neutral MARKETWEIGHT -<br />

Chemicals Neutral MARKETWEIGHT ICI<br />

Automobile Neutral MARKETWEIGHT -<br />

Telecom and Tech Neutral MARKETWEIGHT -<br />

Refineries Neutral UNDERWEIGHT -


3<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Budget FY11: No Change in Flavor 4<br />

Market Strategy: Grist to the Mill 8<br />

Eco<strong>no</strong>my: Budget, a Cautioned Approach 11<br />

Summary of Sector Themes and Outlook<br />

Banks: Key Beneficiary 16<br />

E&P: Valuations with Convictions 17<br />

OMC: No <strong>mention</strong>; Hence <strong>safe</strong> 19<br />

Power: The Back of Beyond 20<br />

Fertilizer: Still Favored! 22<br />

Cements: Still Lurking! 23<br />

Textile: VAT – Fabric-ated! 24<br />

Chemicals: Mixed Reaction 25<br />

Auto: Gears Unchanged 26<br />

Telecom: Silent Talks! 28<br />

Top Investment Ideas 29<br />

June 7, 2010


Hamad Aslam<br />

Head of Research<br />

4<br />

BUDGET FY11: NO CHANGE IN FLAVOR<br />

Eco<strong>no</strong>mic numbers: Challenging yet possible<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Achieving fiscal deficit target of 4.0% of GDP, via imposition of additional taxes<br />

will remain a challenging task for the incumbent government. However<br />

persistently low tax revenues require strong footholds to produce resources for<br />

welfare and development. Thus to manage fiscal space for development and<br />

sustainable growth, all components of tax machinery are projected to be<br />

channelized with the target of 18% YoY growth in tax revenue for FY11.<br />

Overall budget outlay is envisaged to be PKR3trn (+25% YoY), against revenue<br />

base of PKR2.4trn (+18 YoY), translating into consolidated fiscal deficit of<br />

PKR685bn (4.0% of GDP). Strict compliance to the an<strong>no</strong>unced austerity<br />

measures, consistent recovery in manufacturing sector, improvement in power<br />

deficit and materialization of financing to its fullest will remain the key<br />

determinants for achieving FY11 GDP growth target of 4.5%.<br />

Populist measures: Limited by fiscal constraints<br />

Amidst double digit inflation and rising unemployment, the budget lacked<br />

populist measures that the public had been hoping for. However given<br />

constrained fiscal space, there were limited social benefits that the government<br />

could an<strong>no</strong>unce:<br />

� limit of basic exemption was proposed to be enhanced from PKR200K pa<br />

for salaried and PKR100K pa for <strong>no</strong>n-salaried taxpayers to PKR300K pa;<br />

� 50% ad-hoc increment on basic salary for government employees;<br />

� outlay of Benazir Income Support Program increased to PKR50bn from<br />

PKR46bn in FY10;<br />

� maintenance of subsidy for Utility Stores Corporation at PKR4.2bn and<br />

� minimum wage rate increased from PKR6,000/month to PKR7,000/month.<br />

Investment encouraged; When push comes to shove<br />

The budget envisages promoting investment and capacity building by extending<br />

tax credit at the rate of 10% to tax paying companies undergoing BMR<br />

(balancing, modernization and replacement) activity. This concession has been<br />

proposed for the tax years FY11 to FY15 and will be allowed for the tax year in<br />

which the said costs are incurred. While attractive on paper, we believe that<br />

weak demand in most sectors may <strong>no</strong>t allow many companies to take<br />

advantage of this relief. However the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed tax incentive should<br />

encourage well established players, particularly in cement, textile and auto<br />

sectors to undergo BMR in case of demand revival going forward.<br />

Secondly, the budget an<strong>no</strong>unced tax-free repatriation of profits for foreign<br />

lenders on loans extended to companies operating in Pakistan’s industrial<br />

sector. We believe the measure will reduce the cost of such foreign loans taken<br />

by domestic entities; given that the incentive has been extended for all such<br />

loans issued since February 1999, companies such as ENGRO and DGKC<br />

stand to marginally benefit on their current foreign de<strong>no</strong>minated loan books.<br />

Moreover, under this incentive scheme, other established players in cement and<br />

textile sectors will also be able to take advantage of lower LIBOR for their<br />

borrowing requirements.<br />

Lastly, a number of tax incentives have been extended to taxpayers located in<br />

war affected areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, FATA and PATA. We however<br />

believe that given the security situation in these areas, the an<strong>no</strong>unced relief


5<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

package will have limited impact on promoting investment and will be limited to<br />

being a political an<strong>no</strong>uncement.<br />

Energy deficit and circular debt: Ig<strong>no</strong>red?<br />

Eco<strong>no</strong>mic Survey released on the weekend by the Ministry of Finance <strong>no</strong>ted<br />

that the ongoing power deficit in the country resulted in 2% shortfall in GDP<br />

growth for FY10 – a figure that alone signifies the critical need to be addressed.<br />

Current estimates suggest energy shortfall of 3,500MW in the country. While<br />

setting up of Independent Power Producers (IPPs) and Rental Power Projects<br />

(RPPs) may help ease the crisis in the short term; we argue that it is only a<br />

stop-gap solution.<br />

Moreover, circular debt in the energy system has once again ballooned to a net<br />

amount of over PKR100bn; resolution of which is projected to recover at least<br />

500MW of idle power capacity. Thus, in our view, the budget lacked<br />

an<strong>no</strong>uncement of any concrete measures to address the deficit with allocation<br />

for WAPDA and other state owned power sector entities <strong>no</strong>t e<strong>no</strong>ugh to curtail<br />

the backlog of the crisis.<br />

What happened to documentation? VAT deferred, increased taxes<br />

on small companies<br />

Pakistan’s Tax to GDP currently stands at ~10%, higher only to Afghanistan in<br />

the region. Hence there remains <strong>no</strong> doubt that policy formulation needs to be<br />

directed towards increasing tax revenues, with emphasis on increasing the tax<br />

net rather than increasing tax rate on sectors/people already in the net.<br />

In this regard, agriculture sector stands as the most <strong>no</strong>table challenge.<br />

Contributing 21% to the country’s GDP, the sector only accounts for 1% share<br />

in taxes. While bringing agriculture under the tax net will require political will; the<br />

need of the hour was to increase documentation of the eco<strong>no</strong>my.<br />

Value Added Tax (VAT) was the right step in this direction. However wide scale<br />

opposition from political parties, industrialists and Sindh government forced the<br />

federal government to defer the implementation of these reforms till October,<br />

2010. As a stop gap measure, however, it was an<strong>no</strong>unced that General Sales<br />

Tax (GST) will be increased by 100bps to 17% for all goods currently under the<br />

16% regime. The afore<strong>mention</strong>ed an<strong>no</strong>uncement is likely to be more inflationary<br />

and yet <strong>no</strong>t fulfil the originally envisioned purpose of increasing documentation<br />

in the eco<strong>no</strong>my. On the flip side, potential implementation of VAT of 15% in<br />

Oct10 is <strong>no</strong>t likely to result in price rationalization, thereby increasing (or at least<br />

maintaining) margins for manufacturers and the rest of the value chain.<br />

In the same context, the budget an<strong>no</strong>unced increase of income tax on small<br />

companies from 20% to 25%. The latter also being the highest slab for<br />

Association of Persons (AOP) and <strong>no</strong>n-salaried individuals (sole proprietors),<br />

may thereby eliminate the incentive for them to register themselves as a<br />

company.<br />

CGT Exemption withdrawn for equities; mi<strong>no</strong>r deviations from<br />

earlier understanding<br />

The federal budget finally ended the <strong>Capital</strong> Gains Tax (CGT) exemption on<br />

equity trading w.e.f July 1, 2010. The tax schedule was broadly in-line with the<br />

one outlined earlier in February, 2010, however an official <strong>no</strong>tification with<br />

regards to exact modalities is still awaited.


6<br />

CGT Slabs for Equity Trading<br />

Holding Peiord<br />

Less than 6 months<br />

6 to 12 months<br />

Source: Budget documents, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Tax Year Rate of Tax<br />

2010 10.0%<br />

2011 10.0%<br />

2012 12.5%<br />

2013 15.0%<br />

2014 17.5%<br />

2015 17.5%<br />

2016 17.5%<br />

2010 7.5%<br />

2011 8.0%<br />

2012 8.5%<br />

2013 9.0%<br />

2014 9.5%<br />

2015 10.0%<br />

2016 10.0%<br />

Greater than 12 months 0.0%<br />

It should be <strong>no</strong>ted that any purchase of shares done prior to July 1, 2010 will<br />

remain exempt from CGT, irrespective of the date of disposal of these shares.<br />

Moreover, as per our understanding, trading activity for mutual funds should<br />

remain tax-exempt. However any gains made by investors of (both open-end<br />

and closed-end) equity funds on buy-sell of units will be charged with CGT as<br />

per the standard slabs. On the positive side, CGT will be adjustable for any<br />

losses for a period of five years.<br />

Against earlier expectations however, capital gains made by foreign investors<br />

may <strong>no</strong>t be adjusted for potential Pak Rupee devaluation. Moreover, the<br />

‘Advanced Tax’ clause also eliminated the exemption on CGT for equity trading.<br />

It was thus an<strong>no</strong>unced that entities filing advanced tax on quarterly basis will be<br />

liable to pay 2% advanced CGT on security holding period of less than 6<br />

months while holding period of 6-12 months will be applied with advanced CGT<br />

of 1.5%. We understand that while such advanced tax will be adjusted against<br />

potential future capital losses, treatment of CGT under a separate block may<br />

<strong>no</strong>t allow such adjustment against income earned under other revenue heads.<br />

Currently, equity transactions in Pakistan are levied with 16% FED on<br />

brokerage commission. Additional Withholding Tax (WHT) of 0.01% is applied<br />

for sale of securities, however it is considered as minimum tax liable for<br />

aforesaid transactions. Under the CGT regime, we understand that WHT will<br />

also be adjustable against CGT filed annually.<br />

As <strong>mention</strong>ed earlier, we await official FBR <strong>no</strong>tification on the modalities of CGT<br />

implementation and will update our investors as soon as the same is finalized.<br />

Focus on increasing capital market depth; Incentives extended for<br />

corporate listing on the bourses<br />

Tax credit of 5% was an<strong>no</strong>unced for any tax paying company that opts for<br />

enlistment of any registered stock exchange of Pakistan for the tax year of<br />

listing. It should be <strong>no</strong>ted that KSE witnessed merely 3 listings in the year 2009


7<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

against an average of over 7 for the period 2001-2008 (and 20 from 1992 to<br />

2008).<br />

2010 has been encouraging though; KSE has already witnessed numerous<br />

listings from diverse set of industries. We believe the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed budgetary<br />

an<strong>no</strong>uncement should pave way for further listings and enhance market depth<br />

in the domestic bourses.


STRATEGY<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Hamad Aslam<br />

Head of Research<br />

8<br />

MARKET STRATEGY: GRIST TO THE MILL<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Entailing <strong>no</strong> major surprises, the federal budget FY11 remained broadly neutral<br />

for the capital markets. Consensus had been achieved on end of exemption on<br />

CGT w.e.f from July, 2010 between the three largest stakeholders i.e. stock<br />

exchange, FBR and stock brokers. While a paper on exact modalities on the<br />

said tax is awaited from the authorities, the tax brackets are largely in-line with<br />

the ones an<strong>no</strong>unced in Feb, 2010.<br />

CGT; Viewing it as market stabilization vehicle<br />

With around 50% of KSE traded volumes dominated by individual investors,<br />

their psyche and response to tax imposition remains a crucial determinant of<br />

overall market reaction. Individuals are largely hesitant in filing annual tax<br />

returns and thus aforesaid tax regime has given birth to concerns on future<br />

trading activity on the local bourses.<br />

While we do <strong>no</strong>t downplay this concern, we would like to highlight that equity<br />

trading activity for all investors (individuals and companies) is already<br />

documented via earlier introduced Unique Identification Number (UIN).<br />

Moreover, with the CGT having been an<strong>no</strong>unced as early as Feb10, the budget<br />

an<strong>no</strong>uncement is <strong>no</strong>t likely to result in a knee-jerk reaction in the index.<br />

On the flip side, we argue that CGT inherently encourages long term investment<br />

by reducing the incentive to book short term gains and thus acts as a<br />

stabilization vehicle for the market.<br />

Sector specific measures; Banks to stand out<br />

Unlike previous years, the budget an<strong>no</strong>uncement largely maintained a statusquo<br />

on most of the government’s sector-specific policies. Commercial Banks<br />

however stand to gain from better cash flow arising from increased tax<br />

allowance on provisioning expense.<br />

Though largely neutral for Textiles, the budget an<strong>no</strong>uncement may have a short<br />

term positive impact on the sector on the back of delayed implementation of<br />

GST reforms (VAT). The reforms envisage elimination of umbrella cover of<br />

zero-rating regime for export oriented sectors (specifically textiles) and were<br />

thus being anticipated to levy additional taxes on the sector.<br />

For the rest of the sectors, budgetary an<strong>no</strong>uncements remain largely neutral.<br />

Manufacturing sector however may bear marginal increase in cost of production<br />

through increased FED on gas tariff and increased minimum wage rate. Higher<br />

GST will result in an increase in retail prices for cements and FMCG products;<br />

but are likely to be passed on to end consumer without denting the margins.<br />

Increase in tur<strong>no</strong>ver tax to 1.0% (from 0.5% earlier) will however be negative for<br />

companies posting losses on the back of excess depreciation and amortization<br />

expenses.


9<br />

Sector wise Budget Impact and <strong>BMA</strong> Stance<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Sector Budget Impact <strong>BMA</strong> Recommendation Top Picks<br />

Commercial Banks Positive MARKETWEIGHT MCB<br />

Oil & Gas Exploration and Production (E&P) Neutral MARKETWEIGHT PPL, POL<br />

Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) Neutral OVERWEIGHT PSO<br />

Independend Power Producers (IPPs) Neutral OVERWEIGHT HUBC<br />

Fertilizer Neutral MARKETWEIGHT ENGRO<br />

Cement Neutral OVERWEIGHT ACPL<br />

Textile Neutral MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Chemicals Neutral MARKETWEIGHT ICI<br />

Automobile Neutral MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Telecom and Tech<strong>no</strong>logy Neutral MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Refineries Neutral UNDERWEIGHT<br />

What next: Our market view remains positive; inter-play of global<br />

markets may play a role though<br />

KSE100 posted a decline of 8.7% in the month leading to the budget<br />

an<strong>no</strong>uncement; however this may <strong>no</strong>t be too surprising for many. Studying past<br />

index performances since 1998, reveals that uncertainties and concerns have<br />

led to an average fall of 4.4% in the month preceding the an<strong>no</strong>uncement.<br />

Similarly, an<strong>no</strong>uncement of policy measures and emergence of consensus on<br />

them has later led to consolidation and gradual market recovery.<br />

Historical Index movement pre and post budget an<strong>no</strong>uncement<br />

Budget<br />

Dates<br />

07- Days<br />

Prior<br />

30-Days<br />

Prior<br />

90-Days<br />

Prior<br />

2010 5-Jun 1.2% -8.7% 0.1%<br />

07- Days<br />

Forward<br />

30-Days<br />

Forward<br />

90-Days<br />

Forward<br />

2009 13-Jun 2.3% -1.2% 22.7% -0.23% 8.9% 28.4%<br />

2008 11-Jun -0.6% -8.9% -13.7% -5.8% -10.1% -28.7%<br />

2007 9-Jun 2.6% 7.5% 16.3% 1.2% 5.6% -6.5%<br />

2006 6-Jun 4.1% -9.9% -0.6% -11.6% -5.8% -3.9%<br />

2005 6-Jun 5.9% -1.1% -22.9% 4.8% 6.0% 9.6%<br />

2004 12-Jun 0.4% 0.9% 9.6% -2.5% 1.9% -3.9%<br />

2003 7-Jun 1.4% 6.1% 28.3% 3.4% 10.4% 42.0%<br />

2002 15-Jun 4.6% -2.8% -6.3% 0.6% -1.9% 10.6%<br />

2001 18-Jun 0.7% 2.1% -0.1% -2.5% -7.2% -18.0%<br />

2000 17-Jun 6.6% -9.9% -25.5% 1.9% 5.0% 4.2%<br />

1999 12-Jun -1.1% -5.8% 6.8% -6.4% 1.4% 2.8%<br />

1998 12-Jun -2.3% -25.9% -34.3% -4.4% -26.9% -1.7%<br />

1997 13-Jun 4.7% 2.9% 0.4% 0.6% 10.7% 15.0%<br />

1996 13-Jun -2.5% -1.6% 4.1% -0.4% -2.5% -22.0%<br />

1995 14-Jun 1.8% 10.3% -6.3% 1.4% 4.8% 9.5%<br />

1994 15-Jun -0.7% 2.1% -13.0% 2.3% 1.6% -2.3%<br />

1993 16-Jun 1.4% 6.8% 4.7% 4.0% 6.7% 8.9%


High Conviction Stock Ideas<br />

Company Ticker<br />

10<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

1992 17-Jun -3.0% 14.4% 6.1% -3.1% 0.6% -11.0%<br />

1991 18-Jun 2.6% 2.5% 20.9% -4.3% 5.6% 35.2%<br />

1990 19-Jun -0.6% -1.0% NA -2.0% 5.0% 4.1%<br />

Average (since 1990) 1.4% -1.0% -0.1% -1.1% 1.0% 3.6%<br />

Average (since 1998) 2.0% -4.4% -1.5% -1.8% -1.1% 2.9%<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

Current<br />

Price<br />

Having said that, inter-play of global markets may play a more important role<br />

though. Post short lived respite in international markets, financial crisis<br />

emanating from European Union debt crisis has again played havoc in capital<br />

markets.<br />

Keeping these in view, we remain conservative in our investment themes: 1)<br />

pricing power, 2) devaluation positive revenue stream, 3) downside protection<br />

from dividend yields and 4) value with growth. Moreover, we reiterate the need<br />

for concentrated portfolios with investments limited in stocks with greater<br />

degree of certainty. In short, maintaining our 2010 KSE100 index target at<br />

11,500 we (re)flag our high conviction investment ideas as PSO, PPL, HUBC,<br />

ACPL and LUCK while we add MCB in the list on the back of its recent share<br />

price decline and upwards revision in valuations.<br />

Fair<br />

Value<br />

Pot<br />

Upside<br />

EPS (PKR) PER(x) EPS Growth Dividend Yield<br />

PKR/share PKR/share FY09A/E FY10E FY09A/E FY10E FY09A/E FY10E FY09A/E FY10E<br />

Pakistan Petroleum PPL 186 236 27% 27.8 23.4 6.7 8.0 41% -16% 6% 5%<br />

Pakistan State Oil PSO 271 409 51% (39.1) 52.3 NM 6.1 NM NM 2% 2%<br />

MCB Bank MCB 192 245 28% 20.4 22.5 9.4 8.5 1% 11% 6% 7%<br />

Attock Cement ACPL 66 98 48% 17.2 14.1 3.8 4.7 243% -18% 6% 4%<br />

Lucky Cement LUCK 64 87 37% 14.2 12.9 4.5 4.9 72% -9% 6% 3%<br />

Hub Power Company HUBC 33 43 29% 3.3 4.6 10.0 7.2 45% 40% 10% 15%<br />

<strong>BMA</strong> Universe Average<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

8.9 7.8 2% 14% 7% 7%


ECONOMY<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Positive<br />

Abdul Shakur<br />

Eco<strong>no</strong>mist<br />

11<br />

BUDGET FY11: A CAUTIONED APPROACH!<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Considering the political and administrative issues for the implementation of<br />

Value Added Tax (VAT), government postponed VAT implementation till Oct10.<br />

The important factor of the budget an<strong>no</strong>uncement is to incentivise the lower<br />

income class by salary enhancement and trimming direct tax for narrow tax<br />

slabs. Although these measures encourage improvement in disposable income<br />

of the masses, revenue generation will also remain a prime objective of the<br />

government to meet the fiscal requirements.<br />

Being a populist, imposition of additional taxes would remain a challenging act<br />

for the incumbent government. However, persistently low tax revenues require<br />

strong footholds to produce resources for welfare and development. To manage<br />

fiscal space for development and sustainable growth, all components of tax<br />

machinery are projected to be channelized with the target of 18% YoY growth in<br />

tax revenue for FY11. Most important revenue measures includes 1) the<br />

increase of 100bps rate for sales tax to 17%, 2) upward revision of 5% income<br />

tax rate for small companies and 3) increased tax slab for high income class<br />

under salaried head.<br />

Budget FY11: Fiscal deficit of PKR685bn (4% to GDP)<br />

The expected budget outlay of PKR3trn against PKR2.4trn of revenues would<br />

translate into a consolidated fiscal deficit of PKR685bn – 4% of GDP.<br />

Budget FY11: Snapshot<br />

(PKR bn) FY08 FY09 FY10B.E FY11FB.E<br />

Total Revenue 1,499 1,851 2,027 2,411<br />

Tax revenues 1,086 1,331 1,513 1,779<br />

Direct 388 440 557 658<br />

Indirect 698 890 956 1,121<br />

Non Tax revenue 414 520 514 632<br />

FBR revenues 1,010 1,160 1,379 1,669<br />

Total expenditures 2,281 2,497 2,749 3,096<br />

Current 1,858 2,042 2,231 2,433<br />

Interest 490 638 647 699<br />

Defence 285 330 343 442<br />

Development 423 456 646 663<br />

Fiscal Deficit<br />

Financing<br />

(782) (646) (723) -685<br />

External 151 150 312 186<br />

Domestic<br />

Key ratios<br />

626 531 410 499<br />

Tax to GDP 10.4% 10.2% 10.2% 10.4%<br />

FBR tax to GDP 9.6% 8.9% 9.3% 9.7%<br />

Development exp. To GDP 4.0% 3.5% 4.4% 3.9%<br />

Current exp. To GDP 17.7% 15.6% 15.1% 14.2%<br />

Debt servicing to GDP 4.7% 4.9% 4.4% 4.1%<br />

Defence exp. To GDP 2.7% 2.5% 2.3% 2.6%<br />

Deficit to GDP -7.5% -4.9% -4.9% -4.0%<br />

External financing to deficit 19.5% 23.2% 27.0% 27.0%<br />

Domestic finan. To deficit 80.5% 78.0% 56.8% 72.9%<br />

Source: MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research


8%<br />

7%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

12<br />

Taxing consumption: Indirect taxes the key<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Total revenues for the consolidated fiscal operations are expected to grow by<br />

19% to PKR2.4trn. This growth is primarily led by enhanced tax revenue target<br />

for FBR up to PKR1.67trn (21% YoY growth). As the government has increased<br />

the 100bps rate for Sales tax along with number of relaxations for direct taxes,<br />

the revenue generation is more tilted towards indirect taxes. Considering the<br />

number of relief measures under direct taxes, tax revenue target for FY11<br />

seems challenging. Thus imposition of VAT from Oct10 would remain a key<br />

determinant to achieve the revenue targets in this regard.<br />

Expense Rationalization: Seems optimistic<br />

Government has an<strong>no</strong>unced to freeze the <strong>no</strong>n development expenditures (excl.<br />

salaries); although appealing considering the fiscal consolidation, the<br />

materialization of these steps is of prime importance. The overall current<br />

expenditure is projected to increase by 9% over last year budget to PKR3trn.<br />

The unavoidable part of the budget including defence (+29% YoY to<br />

PKR442bn) and debt servicing (+8% YoY to PKR699bn) are to consume as<br />

high as 47% of the current expenditures. On the other hand, development<br />

expenditure which remained the key element in terms of investment and<br />

capacity building is projected to increase by 3% YoY. As it remained the key<br />

accused of fiscal constraints, higher allocation of funds for PSDP to provinces<br />

would remain a key element in materializing the projected outlays. During FY10,<br />

actual disbursement of PSDP remained under PKR300bn compared to original<br />

allocation of PKR646bn.<br />

Higher share of provinces in revenues (57.9% YoY) and allocation of<br />

development funds are the prominent features of budget FY11.<br />

Tax to GDP Provinces to enjoy more auto<strong>no</strong>my<br />

Direct Tax to GDP In direct Tax to GDP FBR tax to GDP<br />

FY07A FY08A FY09A FY10BE FY11BE<br />

Source: MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research Source: MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

12%<br />

10%<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

Provincial share in total revenue Provincial share in PSDP<br />

0%<br />

FY08A FY09A FY10BE FY11BE<br />

Subsidy elimination: The other half of the story<br />

Fiscal constraints have left <strong>no</strong> option but to confine welfare through price pass<br />

on. The government has thus eliminated a number of subsidies through budget<br />

FY11; during FY10, govt. had allocated subsidies of PKR228.9bn (1.5% of<br />

GDP) against initial estimates of PKR119bn (0.9% of GDP). Due to the set plan<br />

of eliminating subsidies on electricity tariffs, the government projects total<br />

subsidies of PKR127bn for FY11 which accounts for 0.7% of GDP and lower by<br />

45% YoY compared to revised budget FY10. Although the electricity related<br />

subsidies are projected to decline by PKR92bn in FY10, it is worth <strong>mention</strong>ing<br />

that <strong>no</strong> concrete plan to address the lingering circular debt issue has been


13<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

an<strong>no</strong>unced in the budget. The circular debt <strong>no</strong>t only caused partial outlays from<br />

PSDP but also caused 2% decline in GDP growth for FY10.<br />

Subsidies: Comparative Analysis<br />

Classifacation Budget 2009-10 Revised 2009-10 Budget 2010-11 YoY<br />

PKR mn<br />

WAPDA 62,903 147,005 84,000 -43%<br />

KESC 3,800 32,521 3,317 -90%<br />

TCP 30,000 30,000 17,130 -43%<br />

USC 4,200 4,200 4,200 0%<br />

Others 19,012 15,266 18,036 18%<br />

Source: MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

Current Subsidies<br />

4.5%<br />

4.0%<br />

3.5%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.5%<br />

2.0%<br />

1.5%<br />

1.0%<br />

0.5%<br />

0.0%<br />

FY01<br />

FY02<br />

FY03<br />

Source: FBS, MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

Deficit financing: Defies monetary easing<br />

119,915 228,992 126,683 -45%<br />

FY04<br />

FY05<br />

FY06<br />

Contrary to last year, government has set rational targets for external financing<br />

at PKR186bn (-41% YoY). During the current fiscal year, financial soundness<br />

indicators i.e. CDS spread and Euro bond yield for Pakistan declined<br />

significantly from their peak levels of 50% and 25% respectively to under 8%.<br />

This development should help government to achieve the target of ~USD500mn<br />

Euro bond issue during FY11. Moreover, it would also help reduce dependence<br />

on uncertain resources i.e. FoDP and other multilateral funds.<br />

On the other hand, rest of the financing requirement for PKR499bn is expected<br />

to be routed through domestic resources wherein banking and <strong>no</strong>n-banking<br />

channels are to contribute PKR167bn and PKR333bn respectively.<br />

Considering the prevailing liquidity issues of the banking system, higher targets<br />

for deficit financing should keep private sector credit in check. Moreover,<br />

uncertainty over projected grants (35% of external financing) would also remain<br />

a concern. In case of <strong>no</strong>n materialization of these inflows, borrowing pressure<br />

on domestic resources is imminent. Persistent borrowing from banking channel<br />

kept monetary aggregates under check and abandoned the private sector<br />

credit. Continuation of deficit financing through banks in FY11 suggests <strong>no</strong><br />

major change on monetary side.<br />

FY07<br />

FY08<br />

FY09<br />

FY10<br />

FY10P<br />

FY11F


14<br />

Fiscal consolidation; Promote savings<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Considering lower savings and investment ratios for an emerging country like<br />

Pakistan, it is of prime importance that savings are promoted – Pakistan’s<br />

savings currently stand at 13.8% of GDP. In order to attain sustainable growth,<br />

increasing domestic savings is the right step to conserve resources for<br />

investments. As per budget FY11, government targets PKR213bn and<br />

PKR61bn through saving instruments and investment bonds. Alongside the<br />

higher targets, declaration of WHT as final tax on profit on Govt. securities i.e.<br />

PIBs and T-bills seems the right step in this direction. However, the same also<br />

indicates restricted downward adjustment for interest rates.<br />

Saving mobilization on the cards Manufacturing to uplift eco<strong>no</strong>mic growth<br />

24<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

Current Account Balance Total Investment National Savings<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

F<br />

2009<br />

R<br />

Source: FBS, MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research Source: FBS, MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

2010<br />

P<br />

5<br />

3<br />

1<br />

-1<br />

-3<br />

-5<br />

-7<br />

-9<br />

-11<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

GDP Agriculture Manufacturing Services Sector<br />

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

F<br />

2009<br />

R<br />

2010<br />

P<br />

Manufacturing: The key growth element<br />

As per the revised eco<strong>no</strong>mic indicators, trend in manufacturing sector remained<br />

the key element for uplifting the overall growth to 4.1% compared to the<br />

anticipated 3.3%. LSM sector has performed well by posting 5.2% YoY growth<br />

compared to steep fall of 3.7% in FY09. To attain consistent growth in real<br />

sector, the recent an<strong>no</strong>uncements regarding 1) tax credit for BMR, 2) 5% tax<br />

credit for enlistment of corporate sector, 3) incentive to foreign lenders for tax<br />

free repatriation of profit on loan and 4) exemptions for war affected areas are<br />

expected to bode well for the industrial sector performance. However, 1)<br />

electricity shortage 2) <strong>no</strong>n resolution of circular debt and 3) higher interest rates<br />

would remain the key risks to attain 5.6% growth target for manufacturing<br />

sector.<br />

Service sector is projected to grow at 4.7% in FY11, wherein tax incentives to<br />

financial sector are to play a vital role. However, the agriculture sector seems to<br />

be neglected in the budget with <strong>no</strong> significant measures an<strong>no</strong>unced on PSDP,<br />

agri-credit and water conservation.<br />

GDP growth for FY11 is targeted at 4.5% along with inflation target of 9.5%.<br />

Considering the prevalent inflationary pressure (CPI at 13.26% for Apr10) along<br />

with incremental 100bps increase in Sales tax and expected 6% electricity tariff<br />

adjustment w.e.f Apr10, the said targets seem challenging to us.


15<br />

KEY MEASURES<br />

Income tax<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

� The long awaited capital gain tax has finally been imposed on securities<br />

wherein long term investment prospects have been incentivised by lower<br />

tax rates.<br />

� Government has increased income tax rate for small companies form<br />

existing 20% to 25%. We expect this to be a measure taken to gradually<br />

bridge the income tax rate gap between small companies and corporates.<br />

In addition, 5% tax credit for enlistment of companies has been an<strong>no</strong>unced<br />

for the year of enlistment.<br />

� Non taxable income has been increased from PKR100,000 and<br />

PKR200,000 to PKR300,000 to incentivise the lower income <strong>no</strong>n salaried<br />

and salaried class. However, tweaking the upper slabs for the salaried class<br />

will help offset the revenue impact for the same.<br />

� To discourage loss adjustment and tax frauds, the government has<br />

increased the minimum tax rate for loss making entities from 0.5% to 1.0%.<br />

� Incentives for investment through 10% tax credit for BMR in the year of<br />

incurrence<br />

� For the rehabilitation of war affected areas the government has taken<br />

multiple steps to promote commercial and industrial activities in the<br />

<strong>no</strong>rthern areas.<br />

� 10% Withholding tax on debt instruments (including govt. securities) is<br />

proposed to be treated as final tax<br />

Sales Tax and Federal Excise Duty<br />

� Sales Tax (GST) rate has been increased form 16% to 17%<br />

� Adjustment of FED paid on beverage concentrate allowed<br />

� Increased FED on Natural Gas from PKR5.09/mmbtu to PKR10/mmbtu<br />

� FED of PKR1.0 per filter rod of cigarettes<br />

� 10% FED on electricity intensive home appliances<br />

Custom Duty<br />

� Reduced custom duty on crude palm oil from PKR9,000/MT to<br />

PKR8,000MT to lower the cost of vegetable ghee and oil<br />

� Reduction of duty to 5% on pharmaceutical raw materials<br />

� Exemption of custom duty on import of raw material for energy saving<br />

lamps to support the local manufacturers<br />

� Exemption of CD and S.tax on rice processing machinery


BANKS<br />

MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Positive<br />

Abdul Shakur<br />

Banking Analyst<br />

16<br />

BANKS: KEY BENEFICIARY!<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

A number of favorable decisions were an<strong>no</strong>unced for the banking sector in<br />

Budget FY11 which are expected to have a positive impact on the sector. The<br />

following are the key elements of the Budget FY11:<br />

� In order to address the admissibility of provisions charged by banks as tax<br />

deductible expenses, provisions against advances for consumer and SME<br />

have been allowed up to 5% of total advances while for other loans it has<br />

been maintained at 1% of total advances. In addition, provision under<br />

doubtful and loss categories charged up to 2008 -which were <strong>no</strong>t claimed<br />

as tax admissible – shall be allowed for the period in which advances were<br />

written off. However, in this case admissibility in case of consumer loans<br />

shall be restricted to 3% of the annual income. Considering the current<br />

practice of the banks to create deferred assets in this regard, this<br />

admissibility of provisions will <strong>no</strong>t impact the bottom-line of the banks.<br />

However, it would help reduce the deferred tax issues and improve cash<br />

flows.<br />

� 10% withholding tax deductible on government securities (including T-Bills<br />

and PIBs) is proposed to be treated as final discharge of tax liability, for<br />

corporations other than commercial banks. This measure would help GoP<br />

raise investments through the corporate sector and thus reducing the<br />

crowding-out effect for the sector. Nevertheless, we believe bank lending is<br />

to remain muted in CY10 amid credit risk and liquidity constraints<br />

� The ambit of advance tax collection over cash withdrawal – subject to tax<br />

@0.3% - has been enhanced to include various transactions including TDR,<br />

CDR, TT, online transfer, pay order and demand draft. However, the impact<br />

of the said development is neutral for banks as the same is passed on to<br />

the customers<br />

Outlook CY10: Positive<br />

Taking into account the above <strong>mention</strong>ed amendments in the Finance Bill, the<br />

banking sector is expected to remain the major beneficiary considering<br />

improving private credit which yields higher than govt. securities. On the other<br />

hand, <strong>no</strong>n materialization of the anticipated change regarding higher corporate<br />

tax rate for banks having 5% or higher spreads is also expected to tune-in<br />

further positive sentiments.<br />

Upward revision for NSS targets by 14% to PKR213bn would however exert<br />

further pressure over banking deposit rates. This factor would further intensify<br />

the impact due the prevailing liquidity issues, therefore we expect banking<br />

spreads to adjust downward. Our liking remains limited to banks having<br />

relatively better spreads and lower liquidity risk with our top pick being MCB.<br />

Comparative Analysis of Spreads<br />

11%<br />

8%<br />

5%<br />

2%<br />

6%<br />

7%<br />

8%<br />

4%<br />

NBP UBL MCB BAFL FABL HBL ABL<br />

Source: Company Reports, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

4%<br />

7%<br />

5%


E&P<br />

MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Hamad Aslam<br />

Head of Research<br />

17<br />

E&P: VALUATIONS WITH CONVICTION<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

With the E&P sector being governed under Petroleum Policies, the federal<br />

budget <strong>no</strong>rmally has limited implications on the sector. However through its<br />

an<strong>no</strong>uncement on allowance of decommissioning cost as a tax deductible<br />

expense, the budget has resolved a long pending tax issue between FBR and<br />

E&P companies.<br />

Decommissioning cost: Deduction allowed over a period of ten<br />

years but one-off expense to be incurred by E&P companies<br />

It was an<strong>no</strong>unced that ‘Decommission Cost’ incurred by E&P companies shall<br />

be allowed as a tax deductible expense to be depleted over a period of ten<br />

years or the life of the development and production lease, whichever is less.<br />

Based on our preliminary understanding, the E&P companies currently<br />

expense out the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed cost at the time of actual decommissioning of<br />

respective wells. However FBR had up till <strong>no</strong>w <strong>no</strong>t allowed the expense to be<br />

tax deductible, as a result of which a total amount of PKR6bn is estimated to be<br />

pending against the sector. Based on latest financial reports, Pakistan<br />

Petroleum (PPL) and Pakistan Oilfield (POL) have respective amounts of<br />

PKR578mn and PKR447mn pending against this head.<br />

For OGDC, recall that the company booked an additional tax amount of<br />

PKR11.6bn in FY08 (and ~PKR3bn in FY09), thereby clearing off its pending<br />

dues against the tax liability.<br />

One-off expense to be booked by E&P companies<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

However, the above amount will <strong>no</strong>w be reversed over the remaining life (or the<br />

remaining of ten years, whichever is less). Moreover, <strong>no</strong>w that the expense has<br />

been allowed to be depleted over ten years, the company will earn the inherent<br />

benefit of time value by front loading the expense. As a result, we expect a<br />

marginal improvement in the bottomline of the E&P companies from FY11<br />

onwards.<br />

Circular debt largely ig<strong>no</strong>red in the budget: Attrition in cash<br />

reserves to continue<br />

To our disappointment, <strong>no</strong> concrete measures were an<strong>no</strong>unced with regards to<br />

resolving the energy chain circular debt; which for E&P companies (particularly<br />

OGDC and PPL) may mean continued attrition in cash reserves, low dividend<br />

payouts and inability to meet desired exploration efforts. (Refer to the section on<br />

Power Sector for details on the current situation on circular debt).<br />

Market weight maintained on the sector<br />

Amount (PKR'mn) EPS (PKR)<br />

POL 578 2.4<br />

PPL 447 0.5<br />

OGDC - -<br />

We maintain MARKETWEIGHT stance on the E&P sector as it continues to<br />

offer cash rich balance sheets, low leverage, good quality of earnings, stable<br />

cash flows and high conviction on earnings. Moreover, with the revenue stream<br />

de<strong>no</strong>minated in USD, the sector offers a hedge against devaluation in Pak<br />

Rupee.


18<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Our NAV based fair value for the index heavy weight OGDC stands at<br />

PKR139/share, translating into a Neutral stance for the scrip. However our fair<br />

value of PKR236/share for our favourite E&P pick, PPL offers an upside<br />

potential of 27% from last closing price. Similarly, POL offers 28% upside to our<br />

fair value of PKR282/share, along with an enticingly cheap FY11 PER of 6.3x.


OMC<br />

OVERWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Muhammad Ali Taufiq<br />

OMC Analyst<br />

19<br />

OMC: NO MENTION; HENCE SAFE<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

While <strong>no</strong> direct budgetary measures were expected for the Oil Marketing<br />

Companies (OMCs), the industry was largely expecting concretre<br />

an<strong>no</strong>uncements from the Finance Ministry to resolve the circular debt menace<br />

in the system. Promises recently made by GoP to inject PKR116bn have been<br />

delayed and the uproar by the entire value chain managed to bring merely<br />

PKR20bn into PEPCO during the month of May10.<br />

Increase in GST to be valuation neutral<br />

As declared in the budget for FY11, GST has been raised from 16% to 17%.<br />

Assuming parity with current PKR/USD rate and intl Ex-refinery prices, the<br />

afore<strong>mention</strong>ed change in GST slab is likely to raise POL product prices by<br />

PKR0.38-0.70/litre (~0.90%) wef July 1, 2010.<br />

Impact of increased GST on retail prices of POL products, assuming parity<br />

with current input prices<br />

POL Products<br />

Source: OGRA, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

However the measure is expected to be valuation neutral for the sector as GST<br />

on POL products is applied on Prescribed + IFEM price which includes both,<br />

distributor and dealer margin. Hence the aforesaid change in GST slab has<br />

direct incidence on consumers and does <strong>no</strong>t affect the respective margins.<br />

FED raised on gas tariff; No impact on CNG prices<br />

Budgetary measures an<strong>no</strong>unced an increase in rate of Federal Excise Duty<br />

(FED) on Natural Gas from PKR5.09/mmbtu to PKR10.0/mmbtu. However with<br />

CNG exempt from FED levy, the aforesaid an<strong>no</strong>uncement is <strong>no</strong>t expected to<br />

have any impact on its prices.<br />

CNG dealers currently pay aggregate taxes of ~PKR33/kg (62% of retail price)<br />

in the form of 25% GST, 4% Income tax and 10% WHT. We maintain our view<br />

that decreasing price differential between 1) CNG and MoGas prices and 2) gas<br />

load-shedding at CNG stations will continue to encourage end consumer to<br />

switch to MoGas.<br />

Outlook FY11E<br />

Retail price @ 16%<br />

GST (amount in PKR)<br />

Retail price @ 17%<br />

GST (amount in KR)<br />

Premium Motor Gasoline 69.04 69.64<br />

HOBC 82.04 82.74<br />

Kerosene Oil 65.49 66.06<br />

Light Diesel Oil 62.61 63.14<br />

JP-1 (domestic) 55.36 55.86<br />

JP-4 52.63 53.08<br />

JP-8 (excluding PARCO) 55.08 55.55<br />

We maintain OVERWEIGHT stance on the sector, backed by cheap valuations<br />

and growing offtakes for furnace oil and motor gasoline. Moreover given the<br />

recent unprecedented share price decline of Pakistan State Oil (PSO), we flag<br />

the stock as one of our high conviction ideas. Our DCF based fair value for PSO<br />

stands at PKR409/share, reflecting an upside potential off 50.9% from last<br />

closing price.<br />

%▲<br />

0.87<br />

0.85<br />

0.87<br />

0.85<br />

0.90<br />

0.86<br />

0.85


POWER<br />

OVERWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Nurali Barkatali<br />

Power Analyst<br />

The Backlog of Circular Debt<br />

Govt Entities<br />

& Others<br />

PIA<br />

Ministry of<br />

Finance<br />

Provinces<br />

PKR35bn<br />

End &<br />

Commercial<br />

Consumer<br />

20<br />

PKR3bn<br />

KESC<br />

PEPCO<br />

Power holding co.<br />

PKR90bn<br />

Power<br />

Distributors<br />

PKR43bn<br />

PDC<br />

PKR50bn<br />

WAPDA<br />

PKR9.2bn<br />

PKR13bn<br />

PKR38bn<br />

PKR1.3bn<br />

POWER: THE BACK OF BEYOND<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Budget FY11 is a <strong>no</strong>n-event for the listed power sector entities as surprisingly<br />

the government did <strong>no</strong>t touch upon the looming Inter-Corporate Debt (ICD).<br />

However, impressions gauged from the budget speech indicate that electricity<br />

tariffs would continue to rise in FY11, eliminating most of the subsidies under<br />

the fiscal reforms agenda supervised by international financial institutions (IMF,<br />

WB and ADB).<br />

Inter-Corporate Debt (ICD): In a Cleft Stick<br />

No tangible an<strong>no</strong>uncement was made in the budget for resolution of ICD which<br />

is estimated to have risen to over PKR100bn on net basis. While profitability for<br />

Independent Power Producers (IPPs) is dictated by their respective Power<br />

Purchase Agreements (PPA), this issue has <strong>no</strong>netheless strained cash flows<br />

and has resulted in elevated finance cost. Moreover, there are far reaching<br />

effects as well; KAPCO, the largest IPP, initially cut down its 450MW capacity<br />

expansion plan to 280MW and then later decided to abandon the project<br />

altogether.<br />

To put things in perspective, federal budget FY09 laid out numerous promises<br />

to resolve the related issues; the major ones included formation of a Power<br />

Holding Company (PHC) which was suppose to assume all the loan liabilities<br />

and pay the mark-up on these loans from budgetary resources. But<br />

unfortunately only PKR85bn worth of TFC was issued during FY10.<br />

PKR2bn<br />

PKR41.1bn PKR58bn<br />

IPPs<br />

Other<br />

KAPCO<br />

HUBCO<br />

Total receivables<br />

PKR127.8bn<br />

PKR10bn<br />

PKR25.1bn<br />

PKR18bn<br />

PKR48.1bn<br />

PKR5bn<br />

OMCs<br />

&<br />

GMCs<br />

PSO<br />

SNGPL<br />

SSGC<br />

Total payables<br />

PKR120bn<br />

PKR31.5bn<br />

PKR12.4bn<br />

PKR18.2bn<br />

PKR9.3bn<br />

PKR4.8bn<br />

PKR43.4bn<br />

Refineries E&P<br />

PARCO<br />

PRL<br />

ATRL<br />

NRL<br />

BOSICOR<br />

Imports<br />

PKR48bn<br />

Source: Business Recorder, Annual Reports, <strong>BMA</strong> Research Total net circular debt: +PKR100bn<br />

PKR2bn<br />

OGDC


21<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Moreover, seemingly the GoP abandoned the PHC formula and withheld further<br />

issuance of TFCs under the said regime. Alternatively, the government planed<br />

to resolve the issue by way of savings from un-utilized resources, cut in Public<br />

Sector Development Program (PSDP) for FY10 and Benazir Income Support<br />

Program (BISP). GoP released first instalment of PKR20bn in the first week of<br />

May 2010 with an assurance to release PKR50bn in the next few days; which<br />

again has failed to materialize as yet.<br />

Additionally, budget FY09 also an<strong>no</strong>unced that GoP would be assuming<br />

responsibility for all arrears of PEPCO against FATA (which at that point in time<br />

stood at PKR80bn) and payment of their electricity bills for the year. While the<br />

recent budgetary measures include PKR10bn subsidy for FATA, <strong>no</strong> allocation<br />

has yet been made to clear the backlog of the region’s dues.<br />

Budgetary Measures: Curry favour<br />

In an effort to curtail electricity demand, the government an<strong>no</strong>unced imposition<br />

of 10% FED on high energy consuming appliances (air conditioners and deepfreezers)<br />

and distribution of ~30mn free energy saver bulbs. Additionally with<br />

the help of ADB, PKR20bn has been allocated for an energy development fund<br />

whose modalities and uses were <strong>no</strong>t outlined.<br />

While <strong>no</strong> comments were made on power tariff hike, we understand that the<br />

GoP will soon be an<strong>no</strong>uncing a 6% tariff hike with retrospective effect from<br />

Apr10. Furthermore, 1% increase in GST to 17% will also increase the<br />

electricity tariffs.<br />

On the flip side, in an effort to provide relaxation to the consumers, government<br />

has proposed a 5% decrease (from currently 10%) in Advance Income Tax<br />

charged on monthly electricity bills.<br />

Power Subsidy: Bite The Bullet<br />

For FY11, GoP will continue to subsidize WAPDA and KESC to the tune of<br />

PKR84bn and PKR3bn respectively. It is pertinent to <strong>no</strong>te that in the previous<br />

budget, subsidy allocation for KESC under the head of tariff differential was<br />

fixed at PKR4bn, however the GoP is expected to end up paying massively<br />

higher at PKR32bn. For WAPDA, under different heads the subsidy increased<br />

to PKR147bn from the budgeted amount of PKR63bn in FY10. Thus<br />

cumulatively government will provide a relief of PKR87bn during FY11 against<br />

PKR180bn in FY10.<br />

Outlook FY11E<br />

Proposed budgetary measures are <strong>no</strong>t likely to have any immediate positive<br />

surprises as uses of PKR20bn energy development fund are yet to be<br />

disclosed. While elimination of power subsidies will have inflationary<br />

implications; we consider it as a prudent measure given the lack of fiscal space<br />

available with the government.<br />

The budget in essence has <strong>no</strong> direct implications for the listed IPPs while <strong>no</strong><br />

an<strong>no</strong>uncements for the resolution of ICD remain a grave concern. The<br />

government eyes Industrial sector growth of 4.9% for FY11; which we believe<br />

will only be achieved through capacity expansions in the power sector.<br />

Moreover, resolution of ICD will <strong>no</strong>t only bode well for the energy chain but will<br />

also encourage large scale investments in the country.<br />

Having discussed the sector at large, we reiterate our OVERWEIGHT stance<br />

and maintain our ‘BUY’ call on HUBC which currently offers a USD based IRR<br />

of 17% based on our dividend forecasts.


FERTILIZER<br />

MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Omar Rafiq<br />

Fertilizer Analyst<br />

22<br />

FERTILIZER: STILL FAVORED!<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Being the cornerstone of GDP growth, agriculture and consequently the fertilizer<br />

sector continued to remain the favored child of the country. Contrary to earlier<br />

expectations of potential removal of subsidies attached to fertilizer production,<br />

<strong>no</strong> outlined plans towards the same was hightlighted. Thus fertilizer<br />

manufacturers are expected to continue to benefit from a lower feed stock gas<br />

price (although fuel stock gas price is expected to go up due to increased FED).<br />

Status-Quo maintained: Viable opportunities still exist within the<br />

sector<br />

No <strong>mention</strong> whatsoever of a possible removal of indirect subsidy (in the form of<br />

feed-stock gas price) is expected to bode well for the sector and investors as<br />

qualms towards possible declines in farming incomes inducing lower appetite<br />

for fertilizer consumption stand abated.<br />

Unlike feed stock gas prices, however, fuel stock gas price is expected to<br />

increase as FED on natural gas is to be increased from PKR5/mmbtu to<br />

PKR10/mmbtu. Although this increase is marginal (1.3%), we expect that this<br />

increase will merely be a pass through for fertilizer manufacturers as the current<br />

demand-supply for urea continues to be stretched by farmer appetite.<br />

With low to negligible chances of increasing support prices and lack of structural<br />

issue resolution for the agriculture sector in sight, farmer payrolls are expected<br />

to decline in the coming period owing to increased urea prices. Urea retail<br />

prices have already touched PKR900-925/bag compared to 1QFY10 average of<br />

PKR800-810/bag. In current circumstances, viable opportunities continue to<br />

exist for the sector via improvement in structural issues such as balanced<br />

fertilizer usage, improved seed varieties and better water management.<br />

Although VAT was expected to increase fertilizer prices (as fertilizer<br />

manufacture is currently exempt from GST), delay in implementation of the<br />

same will temporarily bode well for the sector.<br />

A little down hill<br />

Agrarian eco<strong>no</strong>mic growth in the next year is to be watched carefully particularly<br />

on account of decrease in PSDP allocation to the sector. Food and agriculture<br />

division is expected to receive PKR10.8bn during FY11 compared to<br />

PKR12.0bn in FY10. Live-stock and dairy development division is expected to<br />

receive PKR886mn during FY11 compared to PKR1,400mn last year.<br />

Thus lower availability of the development budget for agrarian eco<strong>no</strong>my is a<br />

potential risk factor for the fertilizer sector.<br />

Outlook FY11E; ENGRO to benefit from recently an<strong>no</strong>unced<br />

incentives<br />

Our top pick amongst the fertilizer manufacturers remains ENGRO. The<br />

company provides an internal hedge as it operates in multiple business lines<br />

while being a market leader in most. The stock offers a potential upside of 28%<br />

from current levels to our SoTP based fair value of PKR232/share.<br />

Additionally, with budget FY11 allowing for tax free repatriation of interest<br />

income to foreign lenders together with beneficial tax credit provisions for new<br />

IPO’s, we expect ENGRO to benefit from lower cost of foreign debt and from<br />

formal listing of its subsidiaries.


CEMENTS<br />

OVERWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Omar Rafiq<br />

Cement Analyst<br />

23<br />

CEMENTS: STILL LURKING!<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

While development budget (PSDP) seemed to be continually showing an<br />

upward trend (standing at an estimated value of PKR663bn; up 30% over last<br />

year’s revised allocation), <strong>no</strong> major development plans were an<strong>no</strong>unced during<br />

the budget of FY11E, particulalry regarding higher infrastructure development.<br />

Further, increase in the minimum wage of workers from PKR6,000/month to<br />

PKR7,000/month is expected to affect cash flows for the concerned.<br />

Despite growing needs of power and water management, dam development<br />

continued to remain as allusive as ever. Moreover, increase in GST from 16%<br />

to 17% is expected to increase cement prices, which though should be passed<br />

on to the end consumer.<br />

Major Development: the resounding shush<br />

No new major infrastructure development was an<strong>no</strong>unced in the coming year’s<br />

budget proposal while stress was laid on the successful completion of current<br />

projects. Although the country continues to be in profound demand for dams<br />

(both as a means for electricity production as well as better water<br />

management), <strong>no</strong> proposal/allocation to fund the same was clearly highlighted.<br />

Although completion of Gomal Zam Dam, Satpara Dam and the rising of<br />

Mangla Dam were highlighted, these projects are medium sized projects<br />

already reaching completion. The earlier indications of commencement of<br />

Daimer-Bhasha Dam construction by October looks like a ‘back to square one’<br />

situation. Further, <strong>no</strong> major infrastructure development plan (other than dams)<br />

was an<strong>no</strong>unced despite continuous demands for improved road networks<br />

catering to both the urban as well as rural parts of the country.<br />

FED steady, GST North<br />

Despite anticipation of increase in FED rates applied to cement production, the<br />

same has been kept unchanged at current levels i.e. PKR700/ton. Although this<br />

bodes well for the demand scenario (especially given the capacity over-hang),<br />

increased GST by 1% to 17% is expected to impact the sector mildly negatively.<br />

We however believe that the producers will pass through any related tax<br />

incidence to final consumers. Moreover, we expect that when in place, this may<br />

be used as a pretext by manufacturers to improve margins by increasing prices.<br />

Loss making entities<br />

An important dimension (potential consequence) for the sector emanates from<br />

the higher tax charge on loss making entities. Under the new rules, tax<br />

collections from such organizations will be done at a rate of 1% of revenues<br />

compared to 0.5% earlier. Given the current scenario, companies such as<br />

Gharibwal, Javedan and Maple Leaf might have increased tax consequences<br />

potentially having a negative impact on their cash flow position.<br />

Outlook FY11E<br />

Our top pick amongst the cement sector continues to be Attock Cement (ACPL)<br />

particularly on account of premium pricing of its product, low leverage in a high<br />

interest rate environment and substantially positive cash flow from operations<br />

compared to its peers. At current levels the stock provides potential upside of<br />

48% to our DCF based fair value of PKR98/share.


TEXTILE<br />

MARKETEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Sana I. Bawani<br />

Textile Analyst<br />

24<br />

TEXTILE: VAT FABRIC-ATED!<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Imposition of VAT stood as the foremost concern for the textile sector prior to<br />

Budget FY11 an<strong>no</strong>uncement; <strong>hence</strong> a 3 month deferrel in the same is likely to<br />

come as a relief for the sector. This is because the textile sector contributes<br />

over 50% to the total export receipts of the country and is exempt from sales<br />

tax. With the implementation of upcoming GST reforms, zero-rating would only<br />

be restricted to exports while the local sales and their relevant input<br />

transactions would be carged with VAT.<br />

Tax credit for BMR costs<br />

Tax credit of 10% for BMR costs is likely to be positive for the textile sector as<br />

these companies undertake such activities to enhance their productivity. Tax<br />

credit would further encourage these companies to keep their plants in up-todate<br />

condition and produce quality products thus become competitive in the<br />

international market.<br />

Increase in FED on natural gas<br />

A number of textile units run on gas-fired plants for which they have their own<br />

captive power generation facilities. Natural gas is supplied to these plants at<br />

PKR288/mmbtu. Budget FY11 has brought about an increase in the rate of<br />

Federal excise Duty (FED) on natural gas from PKR5.09/mmbtu to<br />

PKR10/mmbtu. Power costs account for ~10% of total cost of sales of such<br />

companies thus the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed gas tariff hike, though negative, will have a<br />

minimal impact on the overall profitability. Also, minimum wage rate has also<br />

been enhanced from PKR6,000/month to PKR7,000/month which is likely to<br />

further exacerbate downward pressure on margins.<br />

Outlook FY11E<br />

Textile exports increased by 7% YoY to USD8,462mn in 10MFY10 with raw cotton<br />

and yarn exports leading the way. Exports also benefitted from PKR/USD<br />

depreciation of about 3.2% during the period resulting in higher revenues for the<br />

sector. However, a weak PKR also led to 13% YoY increase in the import bill of the<br />

textile products. Going forward, we believe introduction of BT cotton and higher<br />

export prices for cotton and yarn would continue to encourage trade.<br />

Furthermore, incentives such as zero-rated exports, availability of low cost<br />

financing including export refinance (EFS) and Long-term Financing Facilities<br />

(LTFF) and export rebates would continue to act in the favour of local industry.<br />

At the same time, if Pakistan is awarded the General System of Preferences<br />

(GSP) Plus status from the EU, textile products from the country would be even<br />

more competitive in the international market.<br />

Nishat Mills Limited (NML) stands as our pick from the sector. The stock<br />

currently offers 38% potential upside to our SoTP based fair value of<br />

PKR63/share.


CHEMICALS<br />

MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Sana I. Bawani<br />

Chemicals Analyst<br />

25<br />

CHEMICALS: MIXED REACTION<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Contrary to market expectations, chemical sector remained largely unaffected<br />

from the new budget for FY11. No new policies were an<strong>no</strong>unced for the sector<br />

<strong>no</strong>r any incentives given as such. We believe the government aims to let the<br />

industry function in the present condition till VAT is enforced in Oct10.<br />

Duty reduction on raw material of pharmaceutical items<br />

One change brought about in Budget FY11 has been a reduction in duty to 5%<br />

on pharmaceutical raw materials and drugs. This is expected to lead to a<br />

reduction in prices of medicines based on imported raw materials. In addition,<br />

drug manufacturers including ICI would also benefit from lower production<br />

costs. However, the product would reach consumers with 1% additional sales<br />

tax, thereby, muting the impact of a reduction in duties on raw materials.<br />

Unchanged duty structure on PTA and PSF imports<br />

Duty on Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) remains unchanged at 7.5% since<br />

FY09 while on Polyester Staple Fibre (PSF) it currently stands at 4.5%. With<br />

expectations of a revision in both <strong>no</strong>t being materialized and continuation of<br />

zero-rating; we anticipate a positive response from the market. However,<br />

imposition of VAT in Oct10 would likely abolish zero-rating umbrella cover on<br />

textiles and thus bring the two products under the <strong>no</strong>rmal tariff structure from<br />

then onwards.<br />

Furthermore, raw materials for PTA imported by LOTPTA which includes<br />

Paraxylene (PX) and Acetic Acid continue to be zero-rated.<br />

Outlook FY11E<br />

PTA market remains dominated by LOTPTA, the sole domestic producer of<br />

PTA in the country, whereas, PSF is produced by 4 large companies including<br />

Ibrahim Fibres (IBFL) and ICI. LOTPTA would continue to benefit from the tariff<br />

protection while its margins would depend on international prices for PTA and<br />

PX. PX prices have been stable at USD1,020/ton since the last 2 months while<br />

PTA prices are expected to decline in the near future on the back of low prices<br />

for PTA futures and falling crude prices.<br />

We reiterate our BUY call on ICI, which offers 33% upside to our DCF-based<br />

fair value of PKR177/share. Diversified businesses, affiliation with the largest<br />

decorative paints manufacturer, Akzo Nobel, and a strong brand following are<br />

some of the factors which endorse our choice for the company as a value-pick<br />

at these levels. Not only this, but ICI has also continued to post gross margins<br />

in the vicinity of 20% and offers a dividend yield of 7.5% for CY11E.


AUTO<br />

MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Sana I. Bawani<br />

Auto Analyst<br />

26<br />

AUTO: GEARS UNCHANGED<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

While <strong>no</strong> new policies were an<strong>no</strong>unced for the local auto assemblers, import<br />

rules for used cars also remain unchanged. This suggests that the government<br />

neither aims to encourage more imports of cars <strong>no</strong>r does it intend to let go of its<br />

revenue from the locally assemebled cars. We believe the government has<br />

taken a step in the right direction as automobile is characterized as a luxury<br />

product and relaxation in its imports would have further burdedened the<br />

country’s BoP while a reduction in duties on CKD kits would <strong>no</strong>t necessarily<br />

have been passed on to the customers.<br />

Duties on CKD kits remain unchanged<br />

Contrary to industry expectations, Customs duty at 35% on CKD kits has been<br />

maintained for FY11. It is pertinent to <strong>no</strong>te that CKD kits are imported by all the<br />

4 listed auto assemblers for the manufacture of vehicles in the country. The<br />

imposition of this duty adds to their production costs however it is passed on to<br />

the customers in the shape of higher prices. Increase in demand during the year<br />

has resulted in production going up by 30% YoY to 110,612 units in 10MFY10<br />

against 85,051 units produced in 10MFY09.<br />

Duties on CBUs also remain unchanged<br />

Age limit on import of old CBUs has also been kept unchanged at 3 years,<br />

contrary to importers’ expectations of an increase in the same. An increase in<br />

the age limit of imported used cars would have encouraged greater imports and<br />

burdened the BoP position. At the same time, continuation of this restriction<br />

signals to the continued strength of auto assemblers in the domestic market.<br />

Furthermore, duties on imported CBUs also remain unchanged:<br />

Import Tariffs on CBUs<br />

Company Import Tariff<br />

Upto 800cc 50%<br />

800-1000cc 55%<br />

1000-1500cc 60%<br />

1500-1800cc 75%<br />

Source: Business Recorder, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />

Duty-free import of agricultural tractors<br />

Promotion of agriculture remains to be government’s key objective. For this<br />

reason, it has maintained duty exemption on import of agricultural tractors.<br />

During 10MFY10, tractor sales improved by 40% YoY to 57,749 units as various<br />

tractor schemes aided their offtakes.<br />

Increase in sales tax to increase car prices<br />

Increase in GST from 16% to 17% in the next fiscal year should lead to an<br />

increase in car prices from Jul 01, 10. Therefore, we expect May10 and Jun10<br />

offtake numbers to be on the higher side; during 10MFY10 auto sales have<br />

increased by 37% YoY to 110,752 units with INDU leading the pack with 50%<br />

YoY growth in sales to 40,062 units.


27<br />

Outlook FY11E<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Increased car prices, owing to higher GST, are expected to reduce the pace at<br />

which automobile sales have grown in the current year. We expect sales to<br />

clock in at 135,576 units in FY10E, up 38% from last year. However, sales<br />

growth is expected to be subdued in the following years to 8% and 9.5% in<br />

FY11E and FY12E.<br />

Additionally, the imposition of Value-Added Tax (VAT) from Oct 01, 10 in place<br />

of GST even at a reduced level (15%) is unlikely to bring about a downward<br />

revision in prices. We currently have an ADD stance on INDU with a DCFbased<br />

fair value of PKR288/share.<br />

Automobile Sales Expectations: FY10E-FY13E<br />

Company FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E FY13E<br />

PSMC 50,584 71,000 77,728 86,014 96,202<br />

INDU 34,146 50,000 54,000 58,860 58,860<br />

HCAR 11,144 14,000 14,700 15,582 16,673<br />

DFML 2,287 576 588 611 642<br />

Total 98,161 135,576 147,016 161,068 172,377<br />

Source: PAMA, <strong>BMA</strong> Research


TELECOM<br />

MARKETWEIGHT<br />

Budget Impact<br />

Neutral<br />

Omar Rafiq<br />

Telecom Analyst<br />

28<br />

TELECOM: SILENT TALKS!<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

Following a rapid expansion during the last 4-5 years, telecom sector of<br />

Pakistan has recently seen a stabilizing trend. Growth in the sector has matured<br />

on account of pervasive teledensity being already established, together with low<br />

ARPU (Average revenue per user) decreasing the attractiveness to lure new<br />

investments.<br />

Status-Quo<br />

Rampant growth in the telecom sector and its growing importance in the<br />

services industry have historically allowed the government to consider the<br />

sector for strengthening its revenue base via increased tax collection from<br />

telecom service providers. While teledensity has improved over the period, the<br />

trend has exhibited a decline. Growth rates for teledensity which clocked in at<br />

123% in FY07 tapered off to merely 6% during FY10.<br />

Thus recently slowed growth and an already over-burdened sector (21% GST<br />

applicable compared to 17% for general industries) have led the government to<br />

target other major avenues for boosting its revenue base.<br />

As a result of this, the current year’s budget had little to do with the telecom<br />

sector in general. No additional taxation or concessions were an<strong>no</strong>unced for the<br />

sector as it was possibly considered over stretched amidst a declining ARPU<br />

environment.<br />

Falling PSDP on IT development<br />

Although there exists a major consensus that future growth of the sector lies in<br />

value added reselling and IT based industry (rather than pure conventional<br />

telephony), PSDP allocation for the sector is expected to be declining in the<br />

coming fiscal year - as indicated by 35.8% reduction over FY10 to PKR718mn.<br />

As a result, growth can be expected to be potentially slower for telecom on<br />

account of lacklustre importance given to the sector.<br />

Increased tax on loss making entities; Wateen might bear the brunt<br />

It has been proposed that the government intends to increase tax rate for loss<br />

making organizations at a rate of 1% of revenues (compared to 0.5% earlier).<br />

As a result we may expect new entrants (e.g. Wateen) suffering from high<br />

depreciation (<strong>no</strong>n-cash charge) to be adversely hit.<br />

Outlook FY11E<br />

Our pick from the sector continues to be Pak Telecommunication Limited<br />

(PTCL), owing to its natural mo<strong>no</strong>polistic presence, low leverage, rich cash<br />

reserves and ever increasing array of products on offer. At current levels, the<br />

stock currently offers 46% upside to our SoTP based fair value of PKR29/share.


29<br />

Top Investment Ideas<br />

June 7, 2010


BUY<br />

Fair Value: PKR 242<br />

Current Price: PKR 192<br />

Stock Statistics<br />

Ticker MCB<br />

3-month High/ Low 216.3/ 174.9<br />

Mkt Cap USD mn 1,730<br />

12M ADT mn 1.5<br />

Beta 1.22<br />

MCB vs. KSE Relative Graph<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

Volume mn(RHS) MCB KSE100<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

MCB profile: MCB is one of the<br />

leading banks of Pakistan. Incorporated<br />

in 1947, MCB was nationalized along<br />

with all other private sector banks in<br />

1974. During the last fifteen years, the<br />

Bank has concentrated on growth<br />

through improving service quality,<br />

utilizing its extensive branch network &<br />

developing a large and stable deposit<br />

base<br />

30<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

MCB Bank: Always a <strong>safe</strong> bet!<br />

Investment Summary<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

� Strong fundamentals: Despite tough conditions faced by the banking<br />

sector during the year, MCB has been able to maintain the highest NIMs in<br />

the sector at ~8%. This is thanks to an extensive branch network (3 rd<br />

largest) and highest CASA over its peers. Going forward as well, the bank<br />

can leverage this advantage with an aim to mobilize low cost deposits and<br />

<strong>hence</strong> maintain its NIMs. In addition, CASA is high at 83% which suggests<br />

lower risk to incremental pressure over deposits cost due to liquidity<br />

constraints.<br />

� Comfortable CAR & roomy ADR: MCB has extremely comfortable CAR at<br />

19.1% (Dec09) and roomy ADR at ~73% (Dec09) which bodes well for<br />

balance sheet growth going forward. Although we do <strong>no</strong>t see double digit<br />

growth in its loan book for CY10; better position for the same as credit risk<br />

subsides and high exposure to govt. securities ensure better asset quality<br />

and profitability compared to peers.<br />

� Winner on asset quality: Amongst top tier banks MCB has one of the best<br />

asset quality given relatively lower NPLs to gross loans at ~8.9% compared<br />

to <strong>BMA</strong> universe sector average of ~10%. Moreover, MCB has also<br />

witnessed considerable deceleration in its NPL accumulation on a quarterly<br />

basis. The full impact of this will be seen in CY10 where we expect<br />

provisions against NPLs to come off considerably resulting in significant<br />

bottom-line growth.<br />

� Maintained ROE: MCB also carries one of the highest ROEs (24%)<br />

amongst the Pakistani banks. Therefore, comfort is maintained for investors<br />

with respect to continued dividend payouts.<br />

� Pension fund reversals: MCB continues to benefit from pension fund<br />

reversals. The management forecasts a three year timeline for complete<br />

reversals to take place which will continue to provide relief through lower<br />

administrative expenses and relatively better cost to income ratio.<br />

Financials<br />

CY09A CY10E CY11E CY12E<br />

EPS(PKR) 20.55 23.16 24.88 29.39<br />

Price to book (x) 2.08 1.84 1.62 1.43<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 5% 6% 6% 8%<br />

EPS Growth (%) 13% 7% 18% 13%<br />

Return on Equity (%) 24% 23% 22% 23%<br />

Return on Assets (%) 3% 3% 3% 3%<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research


BUY<br />

Fair Value: PKR 282<br />

Current Price: PKR 221<br />

Stock Statistics<br />

Ticker POL<br />

3-month High/ Low 249.9/216.3<br />

Mkt Cap USD mn 618<br />

12M ADT mn 1.9<br />

Beta 1.13<br />

KSE vs POL Relative Graph<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

Volume mn(RHS) POL KSE100<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

POL Profile: Pakistan Oilfields (POL)<br />

is engaged in oil and gas exploration in<br />

the country and has been investing<br />

independently and in joint ventures with<br />

various other exploration and production<br />

companies. In addition, it is also<br />

manufactures LPG, solvent oil and<br />

sulphur. The company is part of The<br />

Attock Oil Company Limited (OCAC) and<br />

holds 25% ownership stake in National<br />

Refinery Limited.<br />

31<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

4.0<br />

2.0<br />

0.0<br />

Pakistan Oilfields: Growth at its best<br />

Investment Summary<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

� Amidst materialization of production growth from TAL Block: POL’s<br />

performance over FY07-09 has stayed lacklustre as it posted dismal<br />

production data over the period, primarily on account of concerns in one of<br />

its key fields, Pindori (POL ownership stake: 35%). As a result, oil<br />

production for the company declined from 6.0kbpd in FY07 to 3.7kbpd in<br />

FY09 while gas production declined from 47mmcfd to 38mmcfd during the<br />

same time period.<br />

� However with POL accounting for 21% stake in Tal Block, the ongoing<br />

production additions are projected to turn around the company’s profile.<br />

Central Processing Facility has already come online (during 2QFY10) at<br />

Manzalai field, enhancing its oil and gas production to 200+mmcfd (up 4x)<br />

and around 4,000bpd (up 7x), respectively. Moreover Mamikhel and<br />

Maramzai being relatively recent discoveries are projected to come online<br />

during 1HFY11 with cumulative oil and gas production addition of 85mmcfd<br />

of gas and 3,000bpd of oil. As a result, we project POL to deliver an<br />

impressive oil and gas production growth of 18% and 89% respectively in<br />

FY10 while complete annualized impact of production additions will<br />

translate into further double-digit growth in FY11-12.<br />

� Benefits of Attock’s oil conglomerate: POL being the exploration arm of<br />

the Attock group’s portfolio derives part of the strength of its business<br />

model through an inherent shield against the system’s circular debt.<br />

Supplying a substantial portion of its production to the group’s refineries<br />

(Attock Refinery and National Refinery), the company has been able to<br />

sustain itself better than its peers (PPL and OGDC) in the current liquidity<br />

starved environment.<br />

� Moreover, POL owns 20mn shares (25% stake) of National Refinery<br />

Limited (NRL). Hence dividend income from the refinery arm will continue to<br />

add to cash flows and earnings for the company.<br />

� Double-digit EPS growth; Prospective Dividend Yield of 9% for FY11E:<br />

Offering robust EPS growth of 16% and 28% for FY10E and FY11E<br />

respectively, we project the company to post an EPS of PKR42/share for<br />

FY11. Moreover, backed by its rich cash reserves current prices also reflect<br />

prospective dividend yield of 9% for FY11E – the highest amongst its peers!<br />

Financials<br />

FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />

EPS(PKR) 23.8 27.5 35.3 41.9<br />

Price to Earnings (x) 9.3x 8.0x 6.3x 5.5x<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 8.1% 8.1% 9.1% 10.0%<br />

EPS Growth (%) -35% 16% 28% 19%<br />

Return on Equity (%) 20% 21% 23% 25%<br />

Return on Assets (%) 26% 17% 17% 20%<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research


BUY<br />

Fair Value: PKR 236<br />

Current Price: PKR 186<br />

Stock Statistics<br />

Ticker PPL<br />

3-month High/ Low 205.6/181.6<br />

Mkt Cap USD mn 2,194<br />

12M ADT mn 1.1<br />

Beta 1.12<br />

KSE vs PPL Relative Graph<br />

160<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

Volume mn(RHS) PPL KSE100<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

PPL Profile: Pakistan Petroleum (PPL)<br />

is amongst the older E&P companies of<br />

Pakistan. Besides being the largest gas<br />

producer of the country, it also produces<br />

crude oil, Natural Gas Liquid (NGL) and<br />

Liquifies Petroleum Gas (LPG).<br />

Government of Pakistan (GoP) holds<br />

78.4% of the company while the<br />

remaining is divided between<br />

International Finance Corporation and<br />

private investors.<br />

32<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Pakistan Petroleum: Where there’s will…<br />

Investment Summary<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

� Unrivalled exposure to Gas – invaluable in a declining oil price<br />

environment: Given that gas production accounts for 80%+ of PPL’s<br />

revenues, coupled with the fact that around 85% of this production is<br />

contributed by uncapped fields (namely Sui, Kandhkot, Sawan and Mia<strong>no</strong>),<br />

wellhead gas prices for these fields continue to be the single most important<br />

determinant of PPL’s profitability. Hence with the an<strong>no</strong>uncement of 25-30%<br />

increase in wellhead gas prices for these fields, the company stands to<br />

benefit from 34% HoH growth in its EPS for 2HFY10<br />

� More importantly, with wellhead gas prices benchmarked against trailing<br />

average intl crude oil prices, we expect the revenue stream for the company<br />

to stay stable in 1HFY11 even amidst declining global commodity markets<br />

� Declining Sui production profile – but still lower than our forecasts:<br />

Sui field (PPL ownership stake: 100%), the country’s largest gas producing<br />

field, has been posting natural annual production decline of 3-5%. While the<br />

market has shown concerns on recent 5% WoW decline in the field’s<br />

production, it needs to be highlighted that it was in-line with FY09 average<br />

statistics – thereby actually hinting towards annual depletion that is way<br />

lower than our assumption of 5% pa<br />

� Nonetheless, contributing to around 50% of PPL’s revenues, Sui is still a<br />

major concern for the company’s ongoing production and revenue stream.<br />

However, recent and upcoming oil and gas production additions from Tal<br />

Block have largely allayed these concerns.<br />

� We project PPL to post gas production growth of 1%, 4% and 4% for FY10,<br />

FY11 and FY12, respectively. Further, upcoming additions from Mela and<br />

Nashpa are projected to translate into oil production growth of 5% and 2%<br />

for the same time period.<br />

� Turning aggressive, finally! After staying relatively muted on the<br />

exploration front for the last 3 years, the company has finally unravelled its<br />

plans to explore untapped reserves in Pakistan. Plans to assess deeper<br />

prospects at Sui are underway to offset depleting reserves and enhance<br />

production efficiencies while an aggressive international exploration<br />

program (with JV partners) in Iraq, Iran, Yemen and other countries can<br />

provide further impetus to the growth story.<br />

Financials<br />

FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />

EPS(PKR) 27.8 23.4 28.0 29.0<br />

Price to Earnings (x) 6.7x 8.0x 6.6x 6.4x<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 5.8% 5.4% 6.4% 7.0%<br />

EPS Growth (%) 41% (16%) 20% 4%<br />

Return on Equity (%) 44% 31% 31% 31%<br />

Return on Assets (%) 32% 33% 26% 27%<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research


BUY<br />

Fair Value: PKR 409<br />

Current Price: PKR 271<br />

Stock Statistics<br />

Ticker PSO<br />

3-month High/ Low 320.8/255.0<br />

Mkt Cap USD mn 549<br />

12M ADT mn 1.0<br />

Beta 1.04<br />

KSE vs PSO Relative Graph<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

Volume mn(RHS) PSO<br />

KSE100<br />

180<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

PSO Profile: Pakistan State Oil (PSO)<br />

is the market leader in Pakistan’s energy<br />

sector. The company has the largest<br />

network of retail outlets to serve the<br />

automotive sector and is the major fuel<br />

supplier to aviation, railways, power<br />

projects, armed forces and agriculture<br />

sector. PSO also provides Jet Fuel to<br />

Refueling Facilities at 9 airports in<br />

Pakistan and ship fuel at 3 ports. The<br />

company is currently engaged in storage,<br />

distribution and marketing of various POL<br />

products. The company’s current market<br />

share of 83% in the black oil market and<br />

58% share in the white oil market, alone<br />

speak volumes about its success.<br />

33<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Pakistan State Oil: Remains Attractive<br />

Investment Summary<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

� Attractive valuations despite its leadership position: PSO is currently<br />

trading at an enticing FY11E PER of 6.0x and offers a potential upside of<br />

51% to our DCF based fair value of PKR409/share.<br />

� It is the largest OMC in Pakistan with overall market share of 74% and<br />

dominates in almost all product segments particularly in High Speed Diesel<br />

(HSD) and Furnace Oil (FO) with market shares of 56% and 89%<br />

respectively.<br />

� Strong FO demand from the power sector: During 9MFY10, PSO<br />

de<strong>no</strong>minated a sizeable market share of 89% in FO sales with contribution<br />

from the product accounting for 43% towards gross sales of the company.<br />

PSO therefore continues to benefit the most from increasing FO demand<br />

from the power sector. With the new IPPs and RPPs coming online, we<br />

expect industry FO demand surge to continue with total demand to grow by<br />

10% over FY11.<br />

� We believe circular debt in the system should continue to hold back APL<br />

and Shell from regaining their market share; however any resolution in the<br />

issue would encourage these OMCs to re-enter the market. We have thus<br />

assumed a conservative market share of 87% for PSO by FY12E.<br />

� Mogas substituting CNG: During 9MFY10, Mogas sales clocked in at<br />

1,414K MT, depicting a tremendous YoY growth of 24%. This growth stems<br />

from 1) increased power outages and 2) CNG to MoGas substitution on the<br />

back of reduced Mogas-CNG price differential and gas load shedding. We<br />

expect this trend to continue with Mogas sales anticipated to clock in YoY<br />

growth of 23% and 5% for FY10E and FY11E respectively.<br />

� The trigger to look for - PSO stands to benefit the most from circular<br />

debt resolution: Owing to the working capital issues arising from the<br />

circular debt hazard, PSO reported colossal finance costs of PKR7.6bn<br />

during 9MFY10. The resolution of the circular debt can improve liquidity and<br />

payout of the company. More importantly, it has the potential to reduce<br />

annual financial charges for the company by 85%. However at present, we<br />

only foresee a gradual resolution of the crisis as electricity tariff hikes start<br />

to ease the liquidity crunch in the system.<br />

Financials<br />

FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />

EPS(PKR) (39.1) 52.3 45.3 55.2<br />

Price to Earnings (x) 3.4x 5.2x 6.0x 4.9x<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 7.3 1.2 1.0 1.3<br />

EPS Growth (%) NM NM -13.4 21.8<br />

Return on Equity (%) (32.0) 31.0 21.9 21.3<br />

Return on Assets (%) (4.4) 4.5 3.8 4.5<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research


BUY<br />

Fair Value: PKR 43<br />

Current Price: PKR 33<br />

Stock Statistics<br />

Ticker HUBC<br />

3-month High/ Low 35.3/ 31.1<br />

Mkt Cap USD mn 452<br />

12M ADT mn 0.7<br />

Beta 0.80<br />

KSE vs HUBC Relative Graph<br />

170<br />

155<br />

140<br />

125<br />

110<br />

95<br />

80<br />

Volume mn(RHS) HUBC KSE100<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

HUBC Profile: HUBC’s is an<br />

Independent Power Producer. Its<br />

principal business activity is to own,<br />

operate and maintain furnace oil based<br />

power generation. With current installed<br />

capacity of 1,292MW, the company is the<br />

second largest IPP of Pakistan.<br />

HUBC is in the process of setting up an<br />

additional 225MW thermal power plant at<br />

Narowal along with a 75% controlling<br />

stake in Laraib which is to set up an<br />

84MW Hydel power project by FY13.<br />

34<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

HUB Power Company: For ever and a day<br />

Investment Summary<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

� Expansion, from strength to strength: Domestic electricity demand<br />

currently outstrips supply, as the gap is currently estimated at over<br />

3,500MW. The situation raises grave concerns for eco<strong>no</strong>mic growth but<br />

highlights potential opportunities for select players. HUBC is all set to<br />

capitalize on this opportunity with two additional power projects (i) 225MW<br />

Narowal Power project and (ii) 84MW Laraib Power Project.<br />

� While Narowal Power project got delayed by six months, it is expected to be<br />

commissioned by the end of 1QFY11. However , unless there is a wavier<br />

extended by the GoP/WAPDA, the company will be required to abide by the<br />

contractual liability of paying Liquidated Damages (LD) at the rate of<br />

USD17,800/day. A decent portion of LD is then reclaimable from EPC<br />

Contractor by way of contract between the company and the contractor.<br />

� The company is also the first in the private sector to venture into hydel<br />

power generation via its 75% recent acquisition in Laraib Energy Limited,<br />

located in Azad Kashmir. Based on envisaged 70:30 debt to equity ratio,<br />

the management plans to employ internally generated cash for equity<br />

investment and is well positioned to capitalize on 17% USD IRR guaranteed<br />

by the government. The plant is expected to come online in FY13 and will<br />

start adding to shareholder value from then onwards.<br />

� Tariff and indexation factors, Hedged bets: Given the U-shaped tariff<br />

structure of Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) governing HUBC, Dec08<br />

marked the trough for Project Company Equity (PCE) laid out for the<br />

company. Since then, the rise in PCE has been and is projected to result in<br />

increasing tariff and payout for HUBC. Additionally, with the tariff indexed in<br />

USD, any depreciation in Pak Rupee is projected to translate into<br />

proportional increase in bottom-line, cash payouts and fair value for the<br />

company.<br />

� Moreover, with debt repayment schedule being front-loaded for IPPs,<br />

HUBC has already retired the principal portion of its long-term debt for its<br />

original plant of 1,292MW. The remaining portion will be completely retired<br />

by FY16 – allowing the company to take additional debt for its upcoming<br />

expansions as well as sustain its dividend stream going forward.<br />

� Dividend payout, as fit as a fiddle: We have already priced in Narowal<br />

project’s delay implications, based on which our DPS projections stand at<br />

PKR4.5 and PKR5.5 for FY10E and FY11E, respectively. Current prices<br />

thus still reflect attractive prospective dividend yields of 14% and 17%<br />

respectively. In addition, the stock offers USD based IRR of 17% and<br />

reflects 30% upside to our DDM based fair value of PKR43/share.<br />

Financials<br />

FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />

EPS(PKR) 3.3 4.6 5.5 6.6<br />

Price to Earnings (x) 10.1 7.2 6.0 5.0<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 10.1 13.6 16.6 19.1<br />

EPS Growth (%) 45 40 21 20<br />

Return on Equity (%) 13 18 21 25<br />

Return on Assets (%) 4 8 9 11<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research


BUY<br />

Fair Value: PKR 232<br />

Current Price: PKR 182<br />

Stock Statistics<br />

Ticker ENGRO<br />

3-month High/ Low 212.8/ 166.6<br />

Mkt Cap USD mn 704<br />

12M ADT mn 2.3<br />

Beta 1.12<br />

KSE vs ENGRO Relative Graph<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

Volume mn(RHS) ENGRO KSE100<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

ENGRO Profile: ENGRO Corporation<br />

(ENGRO) is soon to become the largest<br />

Urea producer in Pakistan with a name<br />

plate capacity of 2.3mtpa. The company<br />

has followed an aggressive growth<br />

strategy and <strong>no</strong>w operates in various<br />

business lines such as FMCG, chemical<br />

handling, polymer production and<br />

automation.<br />

35<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

ENGRO Corporation: Eggs in more than one basket<br />

Investment Summary<br />

� Diversification: ENGRO’s main advantage stems from its diversified and<br />

well entrenched business lines. The company operates in fertilizer, foods,<br />

energy, chemical, chemical handling and automation business. The<br />

company has recently gone through a demerger of its fertilizer operations<br />

thereby becoming a holding company to better manage debt/cash flows for<br />

its ventures and further expansionary needs.<br />

� Largest Indeed: The company’s current expansionary plant to set-up a<br />

1.3mtpa urea plant at Qadirpur is expected to make Engro the largest urea<br />

producer of the country. Further the company is to receive feed stock gas<br />

subsidy in excess of its counterparts up till 2020 (under the Fertilizer Policy<br />

of 2001) at USD0.70/mmbtu compared to USD1.2/mmbtu prevailing for its<br />

peers. Core margin differential for urea production is expected to be in the<br />

tune of 7% which is to boost the company’s profitability. This increase in<br />

core margin bodes well for the company’s ongoing growth orientation as it<br />

has more access to internally generated funds in a high interest rate<br />

environment.<br />

� Synergies: ENGRO benefits directly and indirectly from synergies existing<br />

between its business units. Chemical handling and polymer generate<br />

supply chain links, Engro Foods benefits indirectly through market<br />

penetration and brand recognition of the fertilizer operations while Engro<br />

EXIMP acts like a trading arm for the fertilizer operations and potentially for<br />

other subsidiaries. By CY11 it is expected that some of ENGRO’s<br />

subsidiaries will reach the maturity phase and start paying out dividends.<br />

This should help boost internal liquidity for the company and reduce<br />

reliance on external sources of financing for the company.<br />

Financials<br />

CY09A CY10E CY11E CY12E<br />

EPS(PKR) 12.07 15.09 23.30 34.94<br />

Price to Earnings (x) 15.0x 11.9x 6.4x 5.2x<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 7% 3% 2% 3%<br />

EPS Growth (%) (7%) 25% 88% 23%<br />

Return on Equity (%) 15% 15% 26% 28%<br />

Return on Assets (%) 5% 5% 9% 11%<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research


BUY<br />

Fair Value: PKR 98<br />

Current Price: PKR 66<br />

Stock Statistics<br />

Ticker ACPL<br />

3-month High/ Low 76.8/ 61.2<br />

Mkt Cap USD mn 68<br />

12M ADT mn 0.1<br />

Beta 0.93<br />

KSE vs ACPL Relative Graph<br />

170<br />

160<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

Volume mn(RHS) ACPL KSE100<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

ACPL Profile: Attock cement accounts<br />

for 4% of the country’s installed cement<br />

capacity; in the south-zone it is 2 nd only to<br />

LUCK. The company is part of the Attock<br />

Group which has thrived well in Pakistan.<br />

The company has managed to push its<br />

product well in the market where it trades<br />

at a premium compared to the<br />

competition and has managed to keep<br />

utilization rates well above the rest of the<br />

industry.<br />

36<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

Attock Cement: Ready Acoustics<br />

Investment Summary<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

� Product Premium: ACPL has consistently been able to market its product<br />

at a premium price owing to its superior quarrying quality, together with<br />

proactive marketing strategies. The company currently sells its product at a<br />

market premium of PKR25-30/bag at PKR300/bag. Its premium product has<br />

led to impressive demand for its product despite a higher price.<br />

� Low Leverage: ACPL benefits from a low leverage, as its profitability is <strong>no</strong>t<br />

hurt by high financial charges (unlike many of its peers). In the current high<br />

interest rate environment, debt servicing has led to severe curtailment of<br />

profitability for many cement manufacturers. The lower leverage also<br />

benefits the company’s liquidity as cash flow from operations are <strong>no</strong>t<br />

affected significantly by mi<strong>no</strong>r fluctuations in price and thus leads to an<br />

overall stability on the profitability front. The company has <strong>no</strong>t required<br />

short-term financing arrangements to bridge the gap between internally<br />

generated funds and cash requirements since FY06.<br />

� An<strong>no</strong>unced acquisition of Al-Abbas Cement (AACIL): <strong>Capital</strong>izing on<br />

cheap valuations and cash rich balance sheet, ACPL has already<br />

an<strong>no</strong>unced its interest in acquiring 74% equity stake in AACIL. The<br />

objective is to target the local and export markets with the lower quality<br />

brand at lower prices and thereby entering into a segment of the market<br />

previously untapped by ACPL. Further, the company wants to aggrandize<br />

its market share in the south of the country which is expected to bode well<br />

as demand for commercial and residential real estate is expected to<br />

improve given the rural urban migration as well as improving per capita<br />

earnings. Not to <strong>mention</strong> that the aforesaid acquisition should result in<br />

inherent tax advantages for ACPL, emanating from tax credit accumulated<br />

by AACIL.<br />

� Utilization: Despite a slum in cement demand locally, ACPL has managed<br />

to maintain its sales utilization at over 96%. More importantly, the company<br />

has managed this feat whilst charging premium price for its product. This<br />

has been made possible by focusing on exports as a means to achieve<br />

higher utilization levels. Its current location near the port allows for lower<br />

freight charges on cement exports which adds to the company’s competitive<br />

advantage in the international markets.<br />

Financials<br />

FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />

EPS(PKR) 17.2 14.1 17.9 19.2<br />

Price to Earnings (x) 3.4x 4.7x 3.7x 3.4x<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 7% 5% 8% 9%<br />

EPS Growth (%) 243% -18% 27% 7%<br />

Return on Equity (%) 31% 21% 23% 21%<br />

Return on Assets (%) 21% 16% 18% 17%<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research


BUY<br />

Fair Value: PKR 177<br />

Current Price: PKR 133<br />

Stock Statistics<br />

Ticker ICI<br />

3-month High/ Low 166.3/125.6<br />

Mkt Cap USD mn 218<br />

12M ADT mn 0.2<br />

Beta 0.96<br />

KSE vs ICI Relative Graph<br />

160<br />

150<br />

140<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

Volume mn(RHS) ICI KSE100<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

Dec-09<br />

Jan-10<br />

Feb-10<br />

Mar-10<br />

Apr-10<br />

May-10<br />

Jun-10<br />

ICI Profile: ICI manufactures and sells<br />

a wide range of industrial and consumer<br />

products in Polyester, Soda Ash, Paints,<br />

Chemicals and Life Sciences segments.<br />

A partnership with AkzoNobel, world's<br />

largest decorative and performance<br />

coatings company, has further added to<br />

ICI's operational and product efficiencies<br />

37<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

ICI Pakistan: Go for it!<br />

Investment Summary<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

� A downtrend at the KSE in recent months pulled down ICI’s stock price to<br />

PKR133/share from its high of PKR181/share in Feb10. However, we<br />

believe that the stock is significantly undervalued at current levels; we have<br />

a DCF-based fair value of PKR177/share for the stock reflecting 33%<br />

upside from current levels<br />

� Diversified Businesses: ICI Pakistan stands to benefit from its strategy of<br />

diversification in its product portfolio and offers high-margin products<br />

including paints, life sciences products and chemicals. Simultaneously, it is<br />

a market leader in Soda Ash and Polyester Staple Fibre (PSF) in Pakistan.<br />

The company’s revenues have increased at a 3yr CAGR of 7% to CY09<br />

while its gross margins have remained in the vicinity of 20%. Given the<br />

diversification in business activities we expect ICI to show a consistent<br />

growth in its sales and profits going forward.<br />

� PSF – the Revenue Driver: PSF contributes 49% to the company’s total<br />

revenue while it earned a gross margin of 9% for the company in 1QCY10.<br />

ICI is the second largest producer of PSF in the country after Ibrahim Fibres<br />

(IBFL). PSF prices averaged at PKR133/kg in the 1QCY10 while after<br />

increasing to PKR138/kg in May10 it has come back to PKR134/kg at<br />

present. The onset of summer season and 15% RD on yarn exports during<br />

the quarter are the key reasons for a slightly subdued demand for the<br />

product during the ongoing quarter leading to a decline in its prices.<br />

However, peaking cotton prices have lately led spinners to tilt their mix<br />

towards polyester for blended yarn. Therefore, we believe ICI’s PSF<br />

segment would continue to benefit from high utilization rates and a regular<br />

clientele going forward. Also, expected declines in the prices of its raw<br />

materials including PTA and MEG are expected to lead to better margins for<br />

the company in case PSF prices also hold strong during the same period.<br />

� Soda Ash – ICI, the market leader: Soda Ash is the second major<br />

contributor to ICI Pakistan's revenue and also yields margins around 30%.<br />

However, in 1QCY10 the segment’s gross margin drastically dropped to 8%<br />

on the back of high costs of energy. We believe ICI would continue to<br />

benefit from stability in its soda ash sales in CY10 on the back of consistent<br />

demand from the downstream industry in the local as well as export<br />

markets.<br />

� Prudent Cash <strong>Management</strong>: One of the key stones for ICI has been its<br />

low debt levels and adequate management of its working capital<br />

requirement. Improving cash balance (PKR3.6bn as of Mar10) has led to an<br />

improvement in ICI’s other income to PKR144mn in 1QCY10 compared to<br />

PKR41mn in the same period last year.<br />

Financials<br />

CY09A CY10E CY11E CY12E<br />

EPS(PKR) 14.7 16.4 20.3 23.9<br />

Price to Earnings (x) 9.0x 8.1x 6.5x 5.6x<br />

Dividend Yield (%) 6% 6% 8% 8%<br />

EPS Growth (%) 10% 11% 24% 18%<br />

Return on Equity (%) 14% 15% 16% 17%<br />

Return on Assets (%) 10% 9% 11% 12%<br />

Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research


38<br />

DISCLAIMER<br />

June 7, 2010<br />

This memorandum is produced by <strong>BMA</strong> <strong>Capital</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Limited and is<br />

only for the use of their clients. While the information contained herein is from<br />

sources believed reliable, we do <strong>no</strong>t represent that it is accurate or complete<br />

and should <strong>no</strong>t be relied upon as such. Opinions expressed may be revised at<br />

any time. This memorandum is for information only and is <strong>no</strong>t an offer to buy or<br />

sell, or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell the securities <strong>mention</strong>ed.<br />

ANALYST CERTIFICATION<br />

We, Hamad Aslam, Abdul Shakur, Nurali Barkatali, Sana I. Bawani, Omar Rafiq<br />

and Ali Taufiq, hereby certify that this report represents our personal opinions<br />

and analysis of information. All views are accurately expressed to the best of<br />

our k<strong>no</strong>wledge. We certify that <strong>no</strong> part of our remuneration is linked either<br />

directly or indirectly to recommendations or analysis covered in this report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!