omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management
omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management
omc: no mention; hence safe - BMA Capital Management
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
65<br />
Federal Budget 2010-11<br />
Cautious Populism<br />
Pakistan Research<br />
Monday June 7, 2010<br />
<strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
Hamad Aslam<br />
haslam@bmacapital.com<br />
Abdul Shakur<br />
abdul.shakur@bmacapital.com<br />
Nurali Barkatali<br />
nurali.barkatali@bmacapital.com<br />
Sana I. Bawani<br />
sana.iqbal@bmacapital.com<br />
Omar Rafiq<br />
omar.rafiq@bmacapital.com<br />
Muhammad Ali Taufiq<br />
ali.taufiq@bmacapital.com
2<br />
CAUTIOUS POPULISM<br />
BUDGET FY11: NO CHANGE IN FLAVOR<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Touching briefly upon a number of themes, the budget lacked a broad based plan to ensure<br />
growth sustainability. Populist measures were an<strong>no</strong>unced but limited to the fiscal space<br />
available with the government. Incentives extended to promote investment, corporatization<br />
and equity market listing are commendable, <strong>no</strong>netheless.<br />
Wide scale opposition on implementation of Value Added Tax (VAT) forced the government to<br />
defer the decision– thereby defeating the originally envisaged goal of increasing<br />
documentation in the eco<strong>no</strong>my. Our main concern however emanated from the silence<br />
adapted by the policy makers on the lingering power deficit and circular debt.<br />
ECONOMICS: A CAUTIONED APPROACH<br />
In pursuance to keep the eco<strong>no</strong>my on growth track, policy shift has been an<strong>no</strong>unced to<br />
mobilize resources from <strong>no</strong>n development side to capacity building. Deviation from the<br />
planned targets and fiscal slippages remained the key dilemma time and again. All the<br />
budgetary measures, including fiscal consolidation, bridging investment saving gaps and<br />
enhancing potential output through development seem prudent – however implementation of<br />
these targets remains challenging.<br />
The envisaged GDP growth target of 4.5% for FY11 will be widely dependent on recovery<br />
from commodity producing sectors i.e. manufacturing and agriculture; for which power deficit<br />
remains the key challenge. On the revenue side, incremental 100bps increase in GST would<br />
be the supporting factor up till the implementation of VAT. However given its inflationary<br />
impact, inflation target of 9.5% for FY11 seem ambitious to us. On the whole, achievement of<br />
fiscal deficit target of 4% of GDP will require resource utilization and strict adherence to the<br />
an<strong>no</strong>unced austerity measures.<br />
MARKET STRATEGY: GRIST TO THE MILL<br />
Removal of CGT exemption on equity trading may imply short term attrition in trading<br />
volumes. However given that the an<strong>no</strong>uncement was in-line with the consensus achieved in<br />
Feb10 and continues exemption on long term holding; we do <strong>no</strong>t foresee any knee-jerk<br />
reaction on the index. Interplay of global markets may however require an ever closer look.<br />
We thus re-iterate our <strong>safe</strong> investment themes with our KSE100 2010 index target intact at<br />
11,500.<br />
BUDGET IMPACTS AND OUR TAKE<br />
Sector<br />
Budget<br />
Impact<br />
<strong>BMA</strong> Recommendation Top Picks<br />
Commercial Banks Positive MARKETWEIGHT MCB<br />
E&P Neutral MARKETWEIGHT PPL, POL<br />
OMCs Neutral OVERWEIGHT PSO<br />
Power Neutral OVERWEIGHT HUBC<br />
Fertilizer Neutral MARKETWEIGHT ENGRO<br />
Cement Neutral OVERWEIGHT ACPL<br />
Textile Neutral MARKETWEIGHT -<br />
Chemicals Neutral MARKETWEIGHT ICI<br />
Automobile Neutral MARKETWEIGHT -<br />
Telecom and Tech Neutral MARKETWEIGHT -<br />
Refineries Neutral UNDERWEIGHT -
3<br />
TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />
Budget FY11: No Change in Flavor 4<br />
Market Strategy: Grist to the Mill 8<br />
Eco<strong>no</strong>my: Budget, a Cautioned Approach 11<br />
Summary of Sector Themes and Outlook<br />
Banks: Key Beneficiary 16<br />
E&P: Valuations with Convictions 17<br />
OMC: No <strong>mention</strong>; Hence <strong>safe</strong> 19<br />
Power: The Back of Beyond 20<br />
Fertilizer: Still Favored! 22<br />
Cements: Still Lurking! 23<br />
Textile: VAT – Fabric-ated! 24<br />
Chemicals: Mixed Reaction 25<br />
Auto: Gears Unchanged 26<br />
Telecom: Silent Talks! 28<br />
Top Investment Ideas 29<br />
June 7, 2010
Hamad Aslam<br />
Head of Research<br />
4<br />
BUDGET FY11: NO CHANGE IN FLAVOR<br />
Eco<strong>no</strong>mic numbers: Challenging yet possible<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Achieving fiscal deficit target of 4.0% of GDP, via imposition of additional taxes<br />
will remain a challenging task for the incumbent government. However<br />
persistently low tax revenues require strong footholds to produce resources for<br />
welfare and development. Thus to manage fiscal space for development and<br />
sustainable growth, all components of tax machinery are projected to be<br />
channelized with the target of 18% YoY growth in tax revenue for FY11.<br />
Overall budget outlay is envisaged to be PKR3trn (+25% YoY), against revenue<br />
base of PKR2.4trn (+18 YoY), translating into consolidated fiscal deficit of<br />
PKR685bn (4.0% of GDP). Strict compliance to the an<strong>no</strong>unced austerity<br />
measures, consistent recovery in manufacturing sector, improvement in power<br />
deficit and materialization of financing to its fullest will remain the key<br />
determinants for achieving FY11 GDP growth target of 4.5%.<br />
Populist measures: Limited by fiscal constraints<br />
Amidst double digit inflation and rising unemployment, the budget lacked<br />
populist measures that the public had been hoping for. However given<br />
constrained fiscal space, there were limited social benefits that the government<br />
could an<strong>no</strong>unce:<br />
� limit of basic exemption was proposed to be enhanced from PKR200K pa<br />
for salaried and PKR100K pa for <strong>no</strong>n-salaried taxpayers to PKR300K pa;<br />
� 50% ad-hoc increment on basic salary for government employees;<br />
� outlay of Benazir Income Support Program increased to PKR50bn from<br />
PKR46bn in FY10;<br />
� maintenance of subsidy for Utility Stores Corporation at PKR4.2bn and<br />
� minimum wage rate increased from PKR6,000/month to PKR7,000/month.<br />
Investment encouraged; When push comes to shove<br />
The budget envisages promoting investment and capacity building by extending<br />
tax credit at the rate of 10% to tax paying companies undergoing BMR<br />
(balancing, modernization and replacement) activity. This concession has been<br />
proposed for the tax years FY11 to FY15 and will be allowed for the tax year in<br />
which the said costs are incurred. While attractive on paper, we believe that<br />
weak demand in most sectors may <strong>no</strong>t allow many companies to take<br />
advantage of this relief. However the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed tax incentive should<br />
encourage well established players, particularly in cement, textile and auto<br />
sectors to undergo BMR in case of demand revival going forward.<br />
Secondly, the budget an<strong>no</strong>unced tax-free repatriation of profits for foreign<br />
lenders on loans extended to companies operating in Pakistan’s industrial<br />
sector. We believe the measure will reduce the cost of such foreign loans taken<br />
by domestic entities; given that the incentive has been extended for all such<br />
loans issued since February 1999, companies such as ENGRO and DGKC<br />
stand to marginally benefit on their current foreign de<strong>no</strong>minated loan books.<br />
Moreover, under this incentive scheme, other established players in cement and<br />
textile sectors will also be able to take advantage of lower LIBOR for their<br />
borrowing requirements.<br />
Lastly, a number of tax incentives have been extended to taxpayers located in<br />
war affected areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, FATA and PATA. We however<br />
believe that given the security situation in these areas, the an<strong>no</strong>unced relief
5<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
package will have limited impact on promoting investment and will be limited to<br />
being a political an<strong>no</strong>uncement.<br />
Energy deficit and circular debt: Ig<strong>no</strong>red?<br />
Eco<strong>no</strong>mic Survey released on the weekend by the Ministry of Finance <strong>no</strong>ted<br />
that the ongoing power deficit in the country resulted in 2% shortfall in GDP<br />
growth for FY10 – a figure that alone signifies the critical need to be addressed.<br />
Current estimates suggest energy shortfall of 3,500MW in the country. While<br />
setting up of Independent Power Producers (IPPs) and Rental Power Projects<br />
(RPPs) may help ease the crisis in the short term; we argue that it is only a<br />
stop-gap solution.<br />
Moreover, circular debt in the energy system has once again ballooned to a net<br />
amount of over PKR100bn; resolution of which is projected to recover at least<br />
500MW of idle power capacity. Thus, in our view, the budget lacked<br />
an<strong>no</strong>uncement of any concrete measures to address the deficit with allocation<br />
for WAPDA and other state owned power sector entities <strong>no</strong>t e<strong>no</strong>ugh to curtail<br />
the backlog of the crisis.<br />
What happened to documentation? VAT deferred, increased taxes<br />
on small companies<br />
Pakistan’s Tax to GDP currently stands at ~10%, higher only to Afghanistan in<br />
the region. Hence there remains <strong>no</strong> doubt that policy formulation needs to be<br />
directed towards increasing tax revenues, with emphasis on increasing the tax<br />
net rather than increasing tax rate on sectors/people already in the net.<br />
In this regard, agriculture sector stands as the most <strong>no</strong>table challenge.<br />
Contributing 21% to the country’s GDP, the sector only accounts for 1% share<br />
in taxes. While bringing agriculture under the tax net will require political will; the<br />
need of the hour was to increase documentation of the eco<strong>no</strong>my.<br />
Value Added Tax (VAT) was the right step in this direction. However wide scale<br />
opposition from political parties, industrialists and Sindh government forced the<br />
federal government to defer the implementation of these reforms till October,<br />
2010. As a stop gap measure, however, it was an<strong>no</strong>unced that General Sales<br />
Tax (GST) will be increased by 100bps to 17% for all goods currently under the<br />
16% regime. The afore<strong>mention</strong>ed an<strong>no</strong>uncement is likely to be more inflationary<br />
and yet <strong>no</strong>t fulfil the originally envisioned purpose of increasing documentation<br />
in the eco<strong>no</strong>my. On the flip side, potential implementation of VAT of 15% in<br />
Oct10 is <strong>no</strong>t likely to result in price rationalization, thereby increasing (or at least<br />
maintaining) margins for manufacturers and the rest of the value chain.<br />
In the same context, the budget an<strong>no</strong>unced increase of income tax on small<br />
companies from 20% to 25%. The latter also being the highest slab for<br />
Association of Persons (AOP) and <strong>no</strong>n-salaried individuals (sole proprietors),<br />
may thereby eliminate the incentive for them to register themselves as a<br />
company.<br />
CGT Exemption withdrawn for equities; mi<strong>no</strong>r deviations from<br />
earlier understanding<br />
The federal budget finally ended the <strong>Capital</strong> Gains Tax (CGT) exemption on<br />
equity trading w.e.f July 1, 2010. The tax schedule was broadly in-line with the<br />
one outlined earlier in February, 2010, however an official <strong>no</strong>tification with<br />
regards to exact modalities is still awaited.
6<br />
CGT Slabs for Equity Trading<br />
Holding Peiord<br />
Less than 6 months<br />
6 to 12 months<br />
Source: Budget documents, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Tax Year Rate of Tax<br />
2010 10.0%<br />
2011 10.0%<br />
2012 12.5%<br />
2013 15.0%<br />
2014 17.5%<br />
2015 17.5%<br />
2016 17.5%<br />
2010 7.5%<br />
2011 8.0%<br />
2012 8.5%<br />
2013 9.0%<br />
2014 9.5%<br />
2015 10.0%<br />
2016 10.0%<br />
Greater than 12 months 0.0%<br />
It should be <strong>no</strong>ted that any purchase of shares done prior to July 1, 2010 will<br />
remain exempt from CGT, irrespective of the date of disposal of these shares.<br />
Moreover, as per our understanding, trading activity for mutual funds should<br />
remain tax-exempt. However any gains made by investors of (both open-end<br />
and closed-end) equity funds on buy-sell of units will be charged with CGT as<br />
per the standard slabs. On the positive side, CGT will be adjustable for any<br />
losses for a period of five years.<br />
Against earlier expectations however, capital gains made by foreign investors<br />
may <strong>no</strong>t be adjusted for potential Pak Rupee devaluation. Moreover, the<br />
‘Advanced Tax’ clause also eliminated the exemption on CGT for equity trading.<br />
It was thus an<strong>no</strong>unced that entities filing advanced tax on quarterly basis will be<br />
liable to pay 2% advanced CGT on security holding period of less than 6<br />
months while holding period of 6-12 months will be applied with advanced CGT<br />
of 1.5%. We understand that while such advanced tax will be adjusted against<br />
potential future capital losses, treatment of CGT under a separate block may<br />
<strong>no</strong>t allow such adjustment against income earned under other revenue heads.<br />
Currently, equity transactions in Pakistan are levied with 16% FED on<br />
brokerage commission. Additional Withholding Tax (WHT) of 0.01% is applied<br />
for sale of securities, however it is considered as minimum tax liable for<br />
aforesaid transactions. Under the CGT regime, we understand that WHT will<br />
also be adjustable against CGT filed annually.<br />
As <strong>mention</strong>ed earlier, we await official FBR <strong>no</strong>tification on the modalities of CGT<br />
implementation and will update our investors as soon as the same is finalized.<br />
Focus on increasing capital market depth; Incentives extended for<br />
corporate listing on the bourses<br />
Tax credit of 5% was an<strong>no</strong>unced for any tax paying company that opts for<br />
enlistment of any registered stock exchange of Pakistan for the tax year of<br />
listing. It should be <strong>no</strong>ted that KSE witnessed merely 3 listings in the year 2009
7<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
against an average of over 7 for the period 2001-2008 (and 20 from 1992 to<br />
2008).<br />
2010 has been encouraging though; KSE has already witnessed numerous<br />
listings from diverse set of industries. We believe the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed budgetary<br />
an<strong>no</strong>uncement should pave way for further listings and enhance market depth<br />
in the domestic bourses.
STRATEGY<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Hamad Aslam<br />
Head of Research<br />
8<br />
MARKET STRATEGY: GRIST TO THE MILL<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Entailing <strong>no</strong> major surprises, the federal budget FY11 remained broadly neutral<br />
for the capital markets. Consensus had been achieved on end of exemption on<br />
CGT w.e.f from July, 2010 between the three largest stakeholders i.e. stock<br />
exchange, FBR and stock brokers. While a paper on exact modalities on the<br />
said tax is awaited from the authorities, the tax brackets are largely in-line with<br />
the ones an<strong>no</strong>unced in Feb, 2010.<br />
CGT; Viewing it as market stabilization vehicle<br />
With around 50% of KSE traded volumes dominated by individual investors,<br />
their psyche and response to tax imposition remains a crucial determinant of<br />
overall market reaction. Individuals are largely hesitant in filing annual tax<br />
returns and thus aforesaid tax regime has given birth to concerns on future<br />
trading activity on the local bourses.<br />
While we do <strong>no</strong>t downplay this concern, we would like to highlight that equity<br />
trading activity for all investors (individuals and companies) is already<br />
documented via earlier introduced Unique Identification Number (UIN).<br />
Moreover, with the CGT having been an<strong>no</strong>unced as early as Feb10, the budget<br />
an<strong>no</strong>uncement is <strong>no</strong>t likely to result in a knee-jerk reaction in the index.<br />
On the flip side, we argue that CGT inherently encourages long term investment<br />
by reducing the incentive to book short term gains and thus acts as a<br />
stabilization vehicle for the market.<br />
Sector specific measures; Banks to stand out<br />
Unlike previous years, the budget an<strong>no</strong>uncement largely maintained a statusquo<br />
on most of the government’s sector-specific policies. Commercial Banks<br />
however stand to gain from better cash flow arising from increased tax<br />
allowance on provisioning expense.<br />
Though largely neutral for Textiles, the budget an<strong>no</strong>uncement may have a short<br />
term positive impact on the sector on the back of delayed implementation of<br />
GST reforms (VAT). The reforms envisage elimination of umbrella cover of<br />
zero-rating regime for export oriented sectors (specifically textiles) and were<br />
thus being anticipated to levy additional taxes on the sector.<br />
For the rest of the sectors, budgetary an<strong>no</strong>uncements remain largely neutral.<br />
Manufacturing sector however may bear marginal increase in cost of production<br />
through increased FED on gas tariff and increased minimum wage rate. Higher<br />
GST will result in an increase in retail prices for cements and FMCG products;<br />
but are likely to be passed on to end consumer without denting the margins.<br />
Increase in tur<strong>no</strong>ver tax to 1.0% (from 0.5% earlier) will however be negative for<br />
companies posting losses on the back of excess depreciation and amortization<br />
expenses.
9<br />
Sector wise Budget Impact and <strong>BMA</strong> Stance<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Sector Budget Impact <strong>BMA</strong> Recommendation Top Picks<br />
Commercial Banks Positive MARKETWEIGHT MCB<br />
Oil & Gas Exploration and Production (E&P) Neutral MARKETWEIGHT PPL, POL<br />
Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) Neutral OVERWEIGHT PSO<br />
Independend Power Producers (IPPs) Neutral OVERWEIGHT HUBC<br />
Fertilizer Neutral MARKETWEIGHT ENGRO<br />
Cement Neutral OVERWEIGHT ACPL<br />
Textile Neutral MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Chemicals Neutral MARKETWEIGHT ICI<br />
Automobile Neutral MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Telecom and Tech<strong>no</strong>logy Neutral MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Refineries Neutral UNDERWEIGHT<br />
What next: Our market view remains positive; inter-play of global<br />
markets may play a role though<br />
KSE100 posted a decline of 8.7% in the month leading to the budget<br />
an<strong>no</strong>uncement; however this may <strong>no</strong>t be too surprising for many. Studying past<br />
index performances since 1998, reveals that uncertainties and concerns have<br />
led to an average fall of 4.4% in the month preceding the an<strong>no</strong>uncement.<br />
Similarly, an<strong>no</strong>uncement of policy measures and emergence of consensus on<br />
them has later led to consolidation and gradual market recovery.<br />
Historical Index movement pre and post budget an<strong>no</strong>uncement<br />
Budget<br />
Dates<br />
07- Days<br />
Prior<br />
30-Days<br />
Prior<br />
90-Days<br />
Prior<br />
2010 5-Jun 1.2% -8.7% 0.1%<br />
07- Days<br />
Forward<br />
30-Days<br />
Forward<br />
90-Days<br />
Forward<br />
2009 13-Jun 2.3% -1.2% 22.7% -0.23% 8.9% 28.4%<br />
2008 11-Jun -0.6% -8.9% -13.7% -5.8% -10.1% -28.7%<br />
2007 9-Jun 2.6% 7.5% 16.3% 1.2% 5.6% -6.5%<br />
2006 6-Jun 4.1% -9.9% -0.6% -11.6% -5.8% -3.9%<br />
2005 6-Jun 5.9% -1.1% -22.9% 4.8% 6.0% 9.6%<br />
2004 12-Jun 0.4% 0.9% 9.6% -2.5% 1.9% -3.9%<br />
2003 7-Jun 1.4% 6.1% 28.3% 3.4% 10.4% 42.0%<br />
2002 15-Jun 4.6% -2.8% -6.3% 0.6% -1.9% 10.6%<br />
2001 18-Jun 0.7% 2.1% -0.1% -2.5% -7.2% -18.0%<br />
2000 17-Jun 6.6% -9.9% -25.5% 1.9% 5.0% 4.2%<br />
1999 12-Jun -1.1% -5.8% 6.8% -6.4% 1.4% 2.8%<br />
1998 12-Jun -2.3% -25.9% -34.3% -4.4% -26.9% -1.7%<br />
1997 13-Jun 4.7% 2.9% 0.4% 0.6% 10.7% 15.0%<br />
1996 13-Jun -2.5% -1.6% 4.1% -0.4% -2.5% -22.0%<br />
1995 14-Jun 1.8% 10.3% -6.3% 1.4% 4.8% 9.5%<br />
1994 15-Jun -0.7% 2.1% -13.0% 2.3% 1.6% -2.3%<br />
1993 16-Jun 1.4% 6.8% 4.7% 4.0% 6.7% 8.9%
High Conviction Stock Ideas<br />
Company Ticker<br />
10<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
1992 17-Jun -3.0% 14.4% 6.1% -3.1% 0.6% -11.0%<br />
1991 18-Jun 2.6% 2.5% 20.9% -4.3% 5.6% 35.2%<br />
1990 19-Jun -0.6% -1.0% NA -2.0% 5.0% 4.1%<br />
Average (since 1990) 1.4% -1.0% -0.1% -1.1% 1.0% 3.6%<br />
Average (since 1998) 2.0% -4.4% -1.5% -1.8% -1.1% 2.9%<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
Current<br />
Price<br />
Having said that, inter-play of global markets may play a more important role<br />
though. Post short lived respite in international markets, financial crisis<br />
emanating from European Union debt crisis has again played havoc in capital<br />
markets.<br />
Keeping these in view, we remain conservative in our investment themes: 1)<br />
pricing power, 2) devaluation positive revenue stream, 3) downside protection<br />
from dividend yields and 4) value with growth. Moreover, we reiterate the need<br />
for concentrated portfolios with investments limited in stocks with greater<br />
degree of certainty. In short, maintaining our 2010 KSE100 index target at<br />
11,500 we (re)flag our high conviction investment ideas as PSO, PPL, HUBC,<br />
ACPL and LUCK while we add MCB in the list on the back of its recent share<br />
price decline and upwards revision in valuations.<br />
Fair<br />
Value<br />
Pot<br />
Upside<br />
EPS (PKR) PER(x) EPS Growth Dividend Yield<br />
PKR/share PKR/share FY09A/E FY10E FY09A/E FY10E FY09A/E FY10E FY09A/E FY10E<br />
Pakistan Petroleum PPL 186 236 27% 27.8 23.4 6.7 8.0 41% -16% 6% 5%<br />
Pakistan State Oil PSO 271 409 51% (39.1) 52.3 NM 6.1 NM NM 2% 2%<br />
MCB Bank MCB 192 245 28% 20.4 22.5 9.4 8.5 1% 11% 6% 7%<br />
Attock Cement ACPL 66 98 48% 17.2 14.1 3.8 4.7 243% -18% 6% 4%<br />
Lucky Cement LUCK 64 87 37% 14.2 12.9 4.5 4.9 72% -9% 6% 3%<br />
Hub Power Company HUBC 33 43 29% 3.3 4.6 10.0 7.2 45% 40% 10% 15%<br />
<strong>BMA</strong> Universe Average<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
8.9 7.8 2% 14% 7% 7%
ECONOMY<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Positive<br />
Abdul Shakur<br />
Eco<strong>no</strong>mist<br />
11<br />
BUDGET FY11: A CAUTIONED APPROACH!<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Considering the political and administrative issues for the implementation of<br />
Value Added Tax (VAT), government postponed VAT implementation till Oct10.<br />
The important factor of the budget an<strong>no</strong>uncement is to incentivise the lower<br />
income class by salary enhancement and trimming direct tax for narrow tax<br />
slabs. Although these measures encourage improvement in disposable income<br />
of the masses, revenue generation will also remain a prime objective of the<br />
government to meet the fiscal requirements.<br />
Being a populist, imposition of additional taxes would remain a challenging act<br />
for the incumbent government. However, persistently low tax revenues require<br />
strong footholds to produce resources for welfare and development. To manage<br />
fiscal space for development and sustainable growth, all components of tax<br />
machinery are projected to be channelized with the target of 18% YoY growth in<br />
tax revenue for FY11. Most important revenue measures includes 1) the<br />
increase of 100bps rate for sales tax to 17%, 2) upward revision of 5% income<br />
tax rate for small companies and 3) increased tax slab for high income class<br />
under salaried head.<br />
Budget FY11: Fiscal deficit of PKR685bn (4% to GDP)<br />
The expected budget outlay of PKR3trn against PKR2.4trn of revenues would<br />
translate into a consolidated fiscal deficit of PKR685bn – 4% of GDP.<br />
Budget FY11: Snapshot<br />
(PKR bn) FY08 FY09 FY10B.E FY11FB.E<br />
Total Revenue 1,499 1,851 2,027 2,411<br />
Tax revenues 1,086 1,331 1,513 1,779<br />
Direct 388 440 557 658<br />
Indirect 698 890 956 1,121<br />
Non Tax revenue 414 520 514 632<br />
FBR revenues 1,010 1,160 1,379 1,669<br />
Total expenditures 2,281 2,497 2,749 3,096<br />
Current 1,858 2,042 2,231 2,433<br />
Interest 490 638 647 699<br />
Defence 285 330 343 442<br />
Development 423 456 646 663<br />
Fiscal Deficit<br />
Financing<br />
(782) (646) (723) -685<br />
External 151 150 312 186<br />
Domestic<br />
Key ratios<br />
626 531 410 499<br />
Tax to GDP 10.4% 10.2% 10.2% 10.4%<br />
FBR tax to GDP 9.6% 8.9% 9.3% 9.7%<br />
Development exp. To GDP 4.0% 3.5% 4.4% 3.9%<br />
Current exp. To GDP 17.7% 15.6% 15.1% 14.2%<br />
Debt servicing to GDP 4.7% 4.9% 4.4% 4.1%<br />
Defence exp. To GDP 2.7% 2.5% 2.3% 2.6%<br />
Deficit to GDP -7.5% -4.9% -4.9% -4.0%<br />
External financing to deficit 19.5% 23.2% 27.0% 27.0%<br />
Domestic finan. To deficit 80.5% 78.0% 56.8% 72.9%<br />
Source: MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research
8%<br />
7%<br />
6%<br />
5%<br />
4%<br />
3%<br />
2%<br />
1%<br />
0%<br />
12<br />
Taxing consumption: Indirect taxes the key<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Total revenues for the consolidated fiscal operations are expected to grow by<br />
19% to PKR2.4trn. This growth is primarily led by enhanced tax revenue target<br />
for FBR up to PKR1.67trn (21% YoY growth). As the government has increased<br />
the 100bps rate for Sales tax along with number of relaxations for direct taxes,<br />
the revenue generation is more tilted towards indirect taxes. Considering the<br />
number of relief measures under direct taxes, tax revenue target for FY11<br />
seems challenging. Thus imposition of VAT from Oct10 would remain a key<br />
determinant to achieve the revenue targets in this regard.<br />
Expense Rationalization: Seems optimistic<br />
Government has an<strong>no</strong>unced to freeze the <strong>no</strong>n development expenditures (excl.<br />
salaries); although appealing considering the fiscal consolidation, the<br />
materialization of these steps is of prime importance. The overall current<br />
expenditure is projected to increase by 9% over last year budget to PKR3trn.<br />
The unavoidable part of the budget including defence (+29% YoY to<br />
PKR442bn) and debt servicing (+8% YoY to PKR699bn) are to consume as<br />
high as 47% of the current expenditures. On the other hand, development<br />
expenditure which remained the key element in terms of investment and<br />
capacity building is projected to increase by 3% YoY. As it remained the key<br />
accused of fiscal constraints, higher allocation of funds for PSDP to provinces<br />
would remain a key element in materializing the projected outlays. During FY10,<br />
actual disbursement of PSDP remained under PKR300bn compared to original<br />
allocation of PKR646bn.<br />
Higher share of provinces in revenues (57.9% YoY) and allocation of<br />
development funds are the prominent features of budget FY11.<br />
Tax to GDP Provinces to enjoy more auto<strong>no</strong>my<br />
Direct Tax to GDP In direct Tax to GDP FBR tax to GDP<br />
FY07A FY08A FY09A FY10BE FY11BE<br />
Source: MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research Source: MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
12%<br />
10%<br />
8%<br />
6%<br />
4%<br />
2%<br />
0%<br />
60%<br />
50%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
20%<br />
10%<br />
Provincial share in total revenue Provincial share in PSDP<br />
0%<br />
FY08A FY09A FY10BE FY11BE<br />
Subsidy elimination: The other half of the story<br />
Fiscal constraints have left <strong>no</strong> option but to confine welfare through price pass<br />
on. The government has thus eliminated a number of subsidies through budget<br />
FY11; during FY10, govt. had allocated subsidies of PKR228.9bn (1.5% of<br />
GDP) against initial estimates of PKR119bn (0.9% of GDP). Due to the set plan<br />
of eliminating subsidies on electricity tariffs, the government projects total<br />
subsidies of PKR127bn for FY11 which accounts for 0.7% of GDP and lower by<br />
45% YoY compared to revised budget FY10. Although the electricity related<br />
subsidies are projected to decline by PKR92bn in FY10, it is worth <strong>mention</strong>ing<br />
that <strong>no</strong> concrete plan to address the lingering circular debt issue has been
13<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
an<strong>no</strong>unced in the budget. The circular debt <strong>no</strong>t only caused partial outlays from<br />
PSDP but also caused 2% decline in GDP growth for FY10.<br />
Subsidies: Comparative Analysis<br />
Classifacation Budget 2009-10 Revised 2009-10 Budget 2010-11 YoY<br />
PKR mn<br />
WAPDA 62,903 147,005 84,000 -43%<br />
KESC 3,800 32,521 3,317 -90%<br />
TCP 30,000 30,000 17,130 -43%<br />
USC 4,200 4,200 4,200 0%<br />
Others 19,012 15,266 18,036 18%<br />
Source: MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
Current Subsidies<br />
4.5%<br />
4.0%<br />
3.5%<br />
3.0%<br />
2.5%<br />
2.0%<br />
1.5%<br />
1.0%<br />
0.5%<br />
0.0%<br />
FY01<br />
FY02<br />
FY03<br />
Source: FBS, MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
Deficit financing: Defies monetary easing<br />
119,915 228,992 126,683 -45%<br />
FY04<br />
FY05<br />
FY06<br />
Contrary to last year, government has set rational targets for external financing<br />
at PKR186bn (-41% YoY). During the current fiscal year, financial soundness<br />
indicators i.e. CDS spread and Euro bond yield for Pakistan declined<br />
significantly from their peak levels of 50% and 25% respectively to under 8%.<br />
This development should help government to achieve the target of ~USD500mn<br />
Euro bond issue during FY11. Moreover, it would also help reduce dependence<br />
on uncertain resources i.e. FoDP and other multilateral funds.<br />
On the other hand, rest of the financing requirement for PKR499bn is expected<br />
to be routed through domestic resources wherein banking and <strong>no</strong>n-banking<br />
channels are to contribute PKR167bn and PKR333bn respectively.<br />
Considering the prevailing liquidity issues of the banking system, higher targets<br />
for deficit financing should keep private sector credit in check. Moreover,<br />
uncertainty over projected grants (35% of external financing) would also remain<br />
a concern. In case of <strong>no</strong>n materialization of these inflows, borrowing pressure<br />
on domestic resources is imminent. Persistent borrowing from banking channel<br />
kept monetary aggregates under check and abandoned the private sector<br />
credit. Continuation of deficit financing through banks in FY11 suggests <strong>no</strong><br />
major change on monetary side.<br />
FY07<br />
FY08<br />
FY09<br />
FY10<br />
FY10P<br />
FY11F
14<br />
Fiscal consolidation; Promote savings<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Considering lower savings and investment ratios for an emerging country like<br />
Pakistan, it is of prime importance that savings are promoted – Pakistan’s<br />
savings currently stand at 13.8% of GDP. In order to attain sustainable growth,<br />
increasing domestic savings is the right step to conserve resources for<br />
investments. As per budget FY11, government targets PKR213bn and<br />
PKR61bn through saving instruments and investment bonds. Alongside the<br />
higher targets, declaration of WHT as final tax on profit on Govt. securities i.e.<br />
PIBs and T-bills seems the right step in this direction. However, the same also<br />
indicates restricted downward adjustment for interest rates.<br />
Saving mobilization on the cards Manufacturing to uplift eco<strong>no</strong>mic growth<br />
24<br />
22<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
Current Account Balance Total Investment National Savings<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
F<br />
2009<br />
R<br />
Source: FBS, MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research Source: FBS, MoF, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
2010<br />
P<br />
5<br />
3<br />
1<br />
-1<br />
-3<br />
-5<br />
-7<br />
-9<br />
-11<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
GDP Agriculture Manufacturing Services Sector<br />
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
F<br />
2009<br />
R<br />
2010<br />
P<br />
Manufacturing: The key growth element<br />
As per the revised eco<strong>no</strong>mic indicators, trend in manufacturing sector remained<br />
the key element for uplifting the overall growth to 4.1% compared to the<br />
anticipated 3.3%. LSM sector has performed well by posting 5.2% YoY growth<br />
compared to steep fall of 3.7% in FY09. To attain consistent growth in real<br />
sector, the recent an<strong>no</strong>uncements regarding 1) tax credit for BMR, 2) 5% tax<br />
credit for enlistment of corporate sector, 3) incentive to foreign lenders for tax<br />
free repatriation of profit on loan and 4) exemptions for war affected areas are<br />
expected to bode well for the industrial sector performance. However, 1)<br />
electricity shortage 2) <strong>no</strong>n resolution of circular debt and 3) higher interest rates<br />
would remain the key risks to attain 5.6% growth target for manufacturing<br />
sector.<br />
Service sector is projected to grow at 4.7% in FY11, wherein tax incentives to<br />
financial sector are to play a vital role. However, the agriculture sector seems to<br />
be neglected in the budget with <strong>no</strong> significant measures an<strong>no</strong>unced on PSDP,<br />
agri-credit and water conservation.<br />
GDP growth for FY11 is targeted at 4.5% along with inflation target of 9.5%.<br />
Considering the prevalent inflationary pressure (CPI at 13.26% for Apr10) along<br />
with incremental 100bps increase in Sales tax and expected 6% electricity tariff<br />
adjustment w.e.f Apr10, the said targets seem challenging to us.
15<br />
KEY MEASURES<br />
Income tax<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
� The long awaited capital gain tax has finally been imposed on securities<br />
wherein long term investment prospects have been incentivised by lower<br />
tax rates.<br />
� Government has increased income tax rate for small companies form<br />
existing 20% to 25%. We expect this to be a measure taken to gradually<br />
bridge the income tax rate gap between small companies and corporates.<br />
In addition, 5% tax credit for enlistment of companies has been an<strong>no</strong>unced<br />
for the year of enlistment.<br />
� Non taxable income has been increased from PKR100,000 and<br />
PKR200,000 to PKR300,000 to incentivise the lower income <strong>no</strong>n salaried<br />
and salaried class. However, tweaking the upper slabs for the salaried class<br />
will help offset the revenue impact for the same.<br />
� To discourage loss adjustment and tax frauds, the government has<br />
increased the minimum tax rate for loss making entities from 0.5% to 1.0%.<br />
� Incentives for investment through 10% tax credit for BMR in the year of<br />
incurrence<br />
� For the rehabilitation of war affected areas the government has taken<br />
multiple steps to promote commercial and industrial activities in the<br />
<strong>no</strong>rthern areas.<br />
� 10% Withholding tax on debt instruments (including govt. securities) is<br />
proposed to be treated as final tax<br />
Sales Tax and Federal Excise Duty<br />
� Sales Tax (GST) rate has been increased form 16% to 17%<br />
� Adjustment of FED paid on beverage concentrate allowed<br />
� Increased FED on Natural Gas from PKR5.09/mmbtu to PKR10/mmbtu<br />
� FED of PKR1.0 per filter rod of cigarettes<br />
� 10% FED on electricity intensive home appliances<br />
Custom Duty<br />
� Reduced custom duty on crude palm oil from PKR9,000/MT to<br />
PKR8,000MT to lower the cost of vegetable ghee and oil<br />
� Reduction of duty to 5% on pharmaceutical raw materials<br />
� Exemption of custom duty on import of raw material for energy saving<br />
lamps to support the local manufacturers<br />
� Exemption of CD and S.tax on rice processing machinery
BANKS<br />
MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Positive<br />
Abdul Shakur<br />
Banking Analyst<br />
16<br />
BANKS: KEY BENEFICIARY!<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
A number of favorable decisions were an<strong>no</strong>unced for the banking sector in<br />
Budget FY11 which are expected to have a positive impact on the sector. The<br />
following are the key elements of the Budget FY11:<br />
� In order to address the admissibility of provisions charged by banks as tax<br />
deductible expenses, provisions against advances for consumer and SME<br />
have been allowed up to 5% of total advances while for other loans it has<br />
been maintained at 1% of total advances. In addition, provision under<br />
doubtful and loss categories charged up to 2008 -which were <strong>no</strong>t claimed<br />
as tax admissible – shall be allowed for the period in which advances were<br />
written off. However, in this case admissibility in case of consumer loans<br />
shall be restricted to 3% of the annual income. Considering the current<br />
practice of the banks to create deferred assets in this regard, this<br />
admissibility of provisions will <strong>no</strong>t impact the bottom-line of the banks.<br />
However, it would help reduce the deferred tax issues and improve cash<br />
flows.<br />
� 10% withholding tax deductible on government securities (including T-Bills<br />
and PIBs) is proposed to be treated as final discharge of tax liability, for<br />
corporations other than commercial banks. This measure would help GoP<br />
raise investments through the corporate sector and thus reducing the<br />
crowding-out effect for the sector. Nevertheless, we believe bank lending is<br />
to remain muted in CY10 amid credit risk and liquidity constraints<br />
� The ambit of advance tax collection over cash withdrawal – subject to tax<br />
@0.3% - has been enhanced to include various transactions including TDR,<br />
CDR, TT, online transfer, pay order and demand draft. However, the impact<br />
of the said development is neutral for banks as the same is passed on to<br />
the customers<br />
Outlook CY10: Positive<br />
Taking into account the above <strong>mention</strong>ed amendments in the Finance Bill, the<br />
banking sector is expected to remain the major beneficiary considering<br />
improving private credit which yields higher than govt. securities. On the other<br />
hand, <strong>no</strong>n materialization of the anticipated change regarding higher corporate<br />
tax rate for banks having 5% or higher spreads is also expected to tune-in<br />
further positive sentiments.<br />
Upward revision for NSS targets by 14% to PKR213bn would however exert<br />
further pressure over banking deposit rates. This factor would further intensify<br />
the impact due the prevailing liquidity issues, therefore we expect banking<br />
spreads to adjust downward. Our liking remains limited to banks having<br />
relatively better spreads and lower liquidity risk with our top pick being MCB.<br />
Comparative Analysis of Spreads<br />
11%<br />
8%<br />
5%<br />
2%<br />
6%<br />
7%<br />
8%<br />
4%<br />
NBP UBL MCB BAFL FABL HBL ABL<br />
Source: Company Reports, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
4%<br />
7%<br />
5%
E&P<br />
MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Hamad Aslam<br />
Head of Research<br />
17<br />
E&P: VALUATIONS WITH CONVICTION<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
With the E&P sector being governed under Petroleum Policies, the federal<br />
budget <strong>no</strong>rmally has limited implications on the sector. However through its<br />
an<strong>no</strong>uncement on allowance of decommissioning cost as a tax deductible<br />
expense, the budget has resolved a long pending tax issue between FBR and<br />
E&P companies.<br />
Decommissioning cost: Deduction allowed over a period of ten<br />
years but one-off expense to be incurred by E&P companies<br />
It was an<strong>no</strong>unced that ‘Decommission Cost’ incurred by E&P companies shall<br />
be allowed as a tax deductible expense to be depleted over a period of ten<br />
years or the life of the development and production lease, whichever is less.<br />
Based on our preliminary understanding, the E&P companies currently<br />
expense out the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed cost at the time of actual decommissioning of<br />
respective wells. However FBR had up till <strong>no</strong>w <strong>no</strong>t allowed the expense to be<br />
tax deductible, as a result of which a total amount of PKR6bn is estimated to be<br />
pending against the sector. Based on latest financial reports, Pakistan<br />
Petroleum (PPL) and Pakistan Oilfield (POL) have respective amounts of<br />
PKR578mn and PKR447mn pending against this head.<br />
For OGDC, recall that the company booked an additional tax amount of<br />
PKR11.6bn in FY08 (and ~PKR3bn in FY09), thereby clearing off its pending<br />
dues against the tax liability.<br />
One-off expense to be booked by E&P companies<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
However, the above amount will <strong>no</strong>w be reversed over the remaining life (or the<br />
remaining of ten years, whichever is less). Moreover, <strong>no</strong>w that the expense has<br />
been allowed to be depleted over ten years, the company will earn the inherent<br />
benefit of time value by front loading the expense. As a result, we expect a<br />
marginal improvement in the bottomline of the E&P companies from FY11<br />
onwards.<br />
Circular debt largely ig<strong>no</strong>red in the budget: Attrition in cash<br />
reserves to continue<br />
To our disappointment, <strong>no</strong> concrete measures were an<strong>no</strong>unced with regards to<br />
resolving the energy chain circular debt; which for E&P companies (particularly<br />
OGDC and PPL) may mean continued attrition in cash reserves, low dividend<br />
payouts and inability to meet desired exploration efforts. (Refer to the section on<br />
Power Sector for details on the current situation on circular debt).<br />
Market weight maintained on the sector<br />
Amount (PKR'mn) EPS (PKR)<br />
POL 578 2.4<br />
PPL 447 0.5<br />
OGDC - -<br />
We maintain MARKETWEIGHT stance on the E&P sector as it continues to<br />
offer cash rich balance sheets, low leverage, good quality of earnings, stable<br />
cash flows and high conviction on earnings. Moreover, with the revenue stream<br />
de<strong>no</strong>minated in USD, the sector offers a hedge against devaluation in Pak<br />
Rupee.
18<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Our NAV based fair value for the index heavy weight OGDC stands at<br />
PKR139/share, translating into a Neutral stance for the scrip. However our fair<br />
value of PKR236/share for our favourite E&P pick, PPL offers an upside<br />
potential of 27% from last closing price. Similarly, POL offers 28% upside to our<br />
fair value of PKR282/share, along with an enticingly cheap FY11 PER of 6.3x.
OMC<br />
OVERWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Muhammad Ali Taufiq<br />
OMC Analyst<br />
19<br />
OMC: NO MENTION; HENCE SAFE<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
While <strong>no</strong> direct budgetary measures were expected for the Oil Marketing<br />
Companies (OMCs), the industry was largely expecting concretre<br />
an<strong>no</strong>uncements from the Finance Ministry to resolve the circular debt menace<br />
in the system. Promises recently made by GoP to inject PKR116bn have been<br />
delayed and the uproar by the entire value chain managed to bring merely<br />
PKR20bn into PEPCO during the month of May10.<br />
Increase in GST to be valuation neutral<br />
As declared in the budget for FY11, GST has been raised from 16% to 17%.<br />
Assuming parity with current PKR/USD rate and intl Ex-refinery prices, the<br />
afore<strong>mention</strong>ed change in GST slab is likely to raise POL product prices by<br />
PKR0.38-0.70/litre (~0.90%) wef July 1, 2010.<br />
Impact of increased GST on retail prices of POL products, assuming parity<br />
with current input prices<br />
POL Products<br />
Source: OGRA, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
However the measure is expected to be valuation neutral for the sector as GST<br />
on POL products is applied on Prescribed + IFEM price which includes both,<br />
distributor and dealer margin. Hence the aforesaid change in GST slab has<br />
direct incidence on consumers and does <strong>no</strong>t affect the respective margins.<br />
FED raised on gas tariff; No impact on CNG prices<br />
Budgetary measures an<strong>no</strong>unced an increase in rate of Federal Excise Duty<br />
(FED) on Natural Gas from PKR5.09/mmbtu to PKR10.0/mmbtu. However with<br />
CNG exempt from FED levy, the aforesaid an<strong>no</strong>uncement is <strong>no</strong>t expected to<br />
have any impact on its prices.<br />
CNG dealers currently pay aggregate taxes of ~PKR33/kg (62% of retail price)<br />
in the form of 25% GST, 4% Income tax and 10% WHT. We maintain our view<br />
that decreasing price differential between 1) CNG and MoGas prices and 2) gas<br />
load-shedding at CNG stations will continue to encourage end consumer to<br />
switch to MoGas.<br />
Outlook FY11E<br />
Retail price @ 16%<br />
GST (amount in PKR)<br />
Retail price @ 17%<br />
GST (amount in KR)<br />
Premium Motor Gasoline 69.04 69.64<br />
HOBC 82.04 82.74<br />
Kerosene Oil 65.49 66.06<br />
Light Diesel Oil 62.61 63.14<br />
JP-1 (domestic) 55.36 55.86<br />
JP-4 52.63 53.08<br />
JP-8 (excluding PARCO) 55.08 55.55<br />
We maintain OVERWEIGHT stance on the sector, backed by cheap valuations<br />
and growing offtakes for furnace oil and motor gasoline. Moreover given the<br />
recent unprecedented share price decline of Pakistan State Oil (PSO), we flag<br />
the stock as one of our high conviction ideas. Our DCF based fair value for PSO<br />
stands at PKR409/share, reflecting an upside potential off 50.9% from last<br />
closing price.<br />
%▲<br />
0.87<br />
0.85<br />
0.87<br />
0.85<br />
0.90<br />
0.86<br />
0.85
POWER<br />
OVERWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Nurali Barkatali<br />
Power Analyst<br />
The Backlog of Circular Debt<br />
Govt Entities<br />
& Others<br />
PIA<br />
Ministry of<br />
Finance<br />
Provinces<br />
PKR35bn<br />
End &<br />
Commercial<br />
Consumer<br />
20<br />
PKR3bn<br />
KESC<br />
PEPCO<br />
Power holding co.<br />
PKR90bn<br />
Power<br />
Distributors<br />
PKR43bn<br />
PDC<br />
PKR50bn<br />
WAPDA<br />
PKR9.2bn<br />
PKR13bn<br />
PKR38bn<br />
PKR1.3bn<br />
POWER: THE BACK OF BEYOND<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Budget FY11 is a <strong>no</strong>n-event for the listed power sector entities as surprisingly<br />
the government did <strong>no</strong>t touch upon the looming Inter-Corporate Debt (ICD).<br />
However, impressions gauged from the budget speech indicate that electricity<br />
tariffs would continue to rise in FY11, eliminating most of the subsidies under<br />
the fiscal reforms agenda supervised by international financial institutions (IMF,<br />
WB and ADB).<br />
Inter-Corporate Debt (ICD): In a Cleft Stick<br />
No tangible an<strong>no</strong>uncement was made in the budget for resolution of ICD which<br />
is estimated to have risen to over PKR100bn on net basis. While profitability for<br />
Independent Power Producers (IPPs) is dictated by their respective Power<br />
Purchase Agreements (PPA), this issue has <strong>no</strong>netheless strained cash flows<br />
and has resulted in elevated finance cost. Moreover, there are far reaching<br />
effects as well; KAPCO, the largest IPP, initially cut down its 450MW capacity<br />
expansion plan to 280MW and then later decided to abandon the project<br />
altogether.<br />
To put things in perspective, federal budget FY09 laid out numerous promises<br />
to resolve the related issues; the major ones included formation of a Power<br />
Holding Company (PHC) which was suppose to assume all the loan liabilities<br />
and pay the mark-up on these loans from budgetary resources. But<br />
unfortunately only PKR85bn worth of TFC was issued during FY10.<br />
PKR2bn<br />
PKR41.1bn PKR58bn<br />
IPPs<br />
Other<br />
KAPCO<br />
HUBCO<br />
Total receivables<br />
PKR127.8bn<br />
PKR10bn<br />
PKR25.1bn<br />
PKR18bn<br />
PKR48.1bn<br />
PKR5bn<br />
OMCs<br />
&<br />
GMCs<br />
PSO<br />
SNGPL<br />
SSGC<br />
Total payables<br />
PKR120bn<br />
PKR31.5bn<br />
PKR12.4bn<br />
PKR18.2bn<br />
PKR9.3bn<br />
PKR4.8bn<br />
PKR43.4bn<br />
Refineries E&P<br />
PARCO<br />
PRL<br />
ATRL<br />
NRL<br />
BOSICOR<br />
Imports<br />
PKR48bn<br />
Source: Business Recorder, Annual Reports, <strong>BMA</strong> Research Total net circular debt: +PKR100bn<br />
PKR2bn<br />
OGDC
21<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Moreover, seemingly the GoP abandoned the PHC formula and withheld further<br />
issuance of TFCs under the said regime. Alternatively, the government planed<br />
to resolve the issue by way of savings from un-utilized resources, cut in Public<br />
Sector Development Program (PSDP) for FY10 and Benazir Income Support<br />
Program (BISP). GoP released first instalment of PKR20bn in the first week of<br />
May 2010 with an assurance to release PKR50bn in the next few days; which<br />
again has failed to materialize as yet.<br />
Additionally, budget FY09 also an<strong>no</strong>unced that GoP would be assuming<br />
responsibility for all arrears of PEPCO against FATA (which at that point in time<br />
stood at PKR80bn) and payment of their electricity bills for the year. While the<br />
recent budgetary measures include PKR10bn subsidy for FATA, <strong>no</strong> allocation<br />
has yet been made to clear the backlog of the region’s dues.<br />
Budgetary Measures: Curry favour<br />
In an effort to curtail electricity demand, the government an<strong>no</strong>unced imposition<br />
of 10% FED on high energy consuming appliances (air conditioners and deepfreezers)<br />
and distribution of ~30mn free energy saver bulbs. Additionally with<br />
the help of ADB, PKR20bn has been allocated for an energy development fund<br />
whose modalities and uses were <strong>no</strong>t outlined.<br />
While <strong>no</strong> comments were made on power tariff hike, we understand that the<br />
GoP will soon be an<strong>no</strong>uncing a 6% tariff hike with retrospective effect from<br />
Apr10. Furthermore, 1% increase in GST to 17% will also increase the<br />
electricity tariffs.<br />
On the flip side, in an effort to provide relaxation to the consumers, government<br />
has proposed a 5% decrease (from currently 10%) in Advance Income Tax<br />
charged on monthly electricity bills.<br />
Power Subsidy: Bite The Bullet<br />
For FY11, GoP will continue to subsidize WAPDA and KESC to the tune of<br />
PKR84bn and PKR3bn respectively. It is pertinent to <strong>no</strong>te that in the previous<br />
budget, subsidy allocation for KESC under the head of tariff differential was<br />
fixed at PKR4bn, however the GoP is expected to end up paying massively<br />
higher at PKR32bn. For WAPDA, under different heads the subsidy increased<br />
to PKR147bn from the budgeted amount of PKR63bn in FY10. Thus<br />
cumulatively government will provide a relief of PKR87bn during FY11 against<br />
PKR180bn in FY10.<br />
Outlook FY11E<br />
Proposed budgetary measures are <strong>no</strong>t likely to have any immediate positive<br />
surprises as uses of PKR20bn energy development fund are yet to be<br />
disclosed. While elimination of power subsidies will have inflationary<br />
implications; we consider it as a prudent measure given the lack of fiscal space<br />
available with the government.<br />
The budget in essence has <strong>no</strong> direct implications for the listed IPPs while <strong>no</strong><br />
an<strong>no</strong>uncements for the resolution of ICD remain a grave concern. The<br />
government eyes Industrial sector growth of 4.9% for FY11; which we believe<br />
will only be achieved through capacity expansions in the power sector.<br />
Moreover, resolution of ICD will <strong>no</strong>t only bode well for the energy chain but will<br />
also encourage large scale investments in the country.<br />
Having discussed the sector at large, we reiterate our OVERWEIGHT stance<br />
and maintain our ‘BUY’ call on HUBC which currently offers a USD based IRR<br />
of 17% based on our dividend forecasts.
FERTILIZER<br />
MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Omar Rafiq<br />
Fertilizer Analyst<br />
22<br />
FERTILIZER: STILL FAVORED!<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Being the cornerstone of GDP growth, agriculture and consequently the fertilizer<br />
sector continued to remain the favored child of the country. Contrary to earlier<br />
expectations of potential removal of subsidies attached to fertilizer production,<br />
<strong>no</strong> outlined plans towards the same was hightlighted. Thus fertilizer<br />
manufacturers are expected to continue to benefit from a lower feed stock gas<br />
price (although fuel stock gas price is expected to go up due to increased FED).<br />
Status-Quo maintained: Viable opportunities still exist within the<br />
sector<br />
No <strong>mention</strong> whatsoever of a possible removal of indirect subsidy (in the form of<br />
feed-stock gas price) is expected to bode well for the sector and investors as<br />
qualms towards possible declines in farming incomes inducing lower appetite<br />
for fertilizer consumption stand abated.<br />
Unlike feed stock gas prices, however, fuel stock gas price is expected to<br />
increase as FED on natural gas is to be increased from PKR5/mmbtu to<br />
PKR10/mmbtu. Although this increase is marginal (1.3%), we expect that this<br />
increase will merely be a pass through for fertilizer manufacturers as the current<br />
demand-supply for urea continues to be stretched by farmer appetite.<br />
With low to negligible chances of increasing support prices and lack of structural<br />
issue resolution for the agriculture sector in sight, farmer payrolls are expected<br />
to decline in the coming period owing to increased urea prices. Urea retail<br />
prices have already touched PKR900-925/bag compared to 1QFY10 average of<br />
PKR800-810/bag. In current circumstances, viable opportunities continue to<br />
exist for the sector via improvement in structural issues such as balanced<br />
fertilizer usage, improved seed varieties and better water management.<br />
Although VAT was expected to increase fertilizer prices (as fertilizer<br />
manufacture is currently exempt from GST), delay in implementation of the<br />
same will temporarily bode well for the sector.<br />
A little down hill<br />
Agrarian eco<strong>no</strong>mic growth in the next year is to be watched carefully particularly<br />
on account of decrease in PSDP allocation to the sector. Food and agriculture<br />
division is expected to receive PKR10.8bn during FY11 compared to<br />
PKR12.0bn in FY10. Live-stock and dairy development division is expected to<br />
receive PKR886mn during FY11 compared to PKR1,400mn last year.<br />
Thus lower availability of the development budget for agrarian eco<strong>no</strong>my is a<br />
potential risk factor for the fertilizer sector.<br />
Outlook FY11E; ENGRO to benefit from recently an<strong>no</strong>unced<br />
incentives<br />
Our top pick amongst the fertilizer manufacturers remains ENGRO. The<br />
company provides an internal hedge as it operates in multiple business lines<br />
while being a market leader in most. The stock offers a potential upside of 28%<br />
from current levels to our SoTP based fair value of PKR232/share.<br />
Additionally, with budget FY11 allowing for tax free repatriation of interest<br />
income to foreign lenders together with beneficial tax credit provisions for new<br />
IPO’s, we expect ENGRO to benefit from lower cost of foreign debt and from<br />
formal listing of its subsidiaries.
CEMENTS<br />
OVERWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Omar Rafiq<br />
Cement Analyst<br />
23<br />
CEMENTS: STILL LURKING!<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
While development budget (PSDP) seemed to be continually showing an<br />
upward trend (standing at an estimated value of PKR663bn; up 30% over last<br />
year’s revised allocation), <strong>no</strong> major development plans were an<strong>no</strong>unced during<br />
the budget of FY11E, particulalry regarding higher infrastructure development.<br />
Further, increase in the minimum wage of workers from PKR6,000/month to<br />
PKR7,000/month is expected to affect cash flows for the concerned.<br />
Despite growing needs of power and water management, dam development<br />
continued to remain as allusive as ever. Moreover, increase in GST from 16%<br />
to 17% is expected to increase cement prices, which though should be passed<br />
on to the end consumer.<br />
Major Development: the resounding shush<br />
No new major infrastructure development was an<strong>no</strong>unced in the coming year’s<br />
budget proposal while stress was laid on the successful completion of current<br />
projects. Although the country continues to be in profound demand for dams<br />
(both as a means for electricity production as well as better water<br />
management), <strong>no</strong> proposal/allocation to fund the same was clearly highlighted.<br />
Although completion of Gomal Zam Dam, Satpara Dam and the rising of<br />
Mangla Dam were highlighted, these projects are medium sized projects<br />
already reaching completion. The earlier indications of commencement of<br />
Daimer-Bhasha Dam construction by October looks like a ‘back to square one’<br />
situation. Further, <strong>no</strong> major infrastructure development plan (other than dams)<br />
was an<strong>no</strong>unced despite continuous demands for improved road networks<br />
catering to both the urban as well as rural parts of the country.<br />
FED steady, GST North<br />
Despite anticipation of increase in FED rates applied to cement production, the<br />
same has been kept unchanged at current levels i.e. PKR700/ton. Although this<br />
bodes well for the demand scenario (especially given the capacity over-hang),<br />
increased GST by 1% to 17% is expected to impact the sector mildly negatively.<br />
We however believe that the producers will pass through any related tax<br />
incidence to final consumers. Moreover, we expect that when in place, this may<br />
be used as a pretext by manufacturers to improve margins by increasing prices.<br />
Loss making entities<br />
An important dimension (potential consequence) for the sector emanates from<br />
the higher tax charge on loss making entities. Under the new rules, tax<br />
collections from such organizations will be done at a rate of 1% of revenues<br />
compared to 0.5% earlier. Given the current scenario, companies such as<br />
Gharibwal, Javedan and Maple Leaf might have increased tax consequences<br />
potentially having a negative impact on their cash flow position.<br />
Outlook FY11E<br />
Our top pick amongst the cement sector continues to be Attock Cement (ACPL)<br />
particularly on account of premium pricing of its product, low leverage in a high<br />
interest rate environment and substantially positive cash flow from operations<br />
compared to its peers. At current levels the stock provides potential upside of<br />
48% to our DCF based fair value of PKR98/share.
TEXTILE<br />
MARKETEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Sana I. Bawani<br />
Textile Analyst<br />
24<br />
TEXTILE: VAT FABRIC-ATED!<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Imposition of VAT stood as the foremost concern for the textile sector prior to<br />
Budget FY11 an<strong>no</strong>uncement; <strong>hence</strong> a 3 month deferrel in the same is likely to<br />
come as a relief for the sector. This is because the textile sector contributes<br />
over 50% to the total export receipts of the country and is exempt from sales<br />
tax. With the implementation of upcoming GST reforms, zero-rating would only<br />
be restricted to exports while the local sales and their relevant input<br />
transactions would be carged with VAT.<br />
Tax credit for BMR costs<br />
Tax credit of 10% for BMR costs is likely to be positive for the textile sector as<br />
these companies undertake such activities to enhance their productivity. Tax<br />
credit would further encourage these companies to keep their plants in up-todate<br />
condition and produce quality products thus become competitive in the<br />
international market.<br />
Increase in FED on natural gas<br />
A number of textile units run on gas-fired plants for which they have their own<br />
captive power generation facilities. Natural gas is supplied to these plants at<br />
PKR288/mmbtu. Budget FY11 has brought about an increase in the rate of<br />
Federal excise Duty (FED) on natural gas from PKR5.09/mmbtu to<br />
PKR10/mmbtu. Power costs account for ~10% of total cost of sales of such<br />
companies thus the afore<strong>mention</strong>ed gas tariff hike, though negative, will have a<br />
minimal impact on the overall profitability. Also, minimum wage rate has also<br />
been enhanced from PKR6,000/month to PKR7,000/month which is likely to<br />
further exacerbate downward pressure on margins.<br />
Outlook FY11E<br />
Textile exports increased by 7% YoY to USD8,462mn in 10MFY10 with raw cotton<br />
and yarn exports leading the way. Exports also benefitted from PKR/USD<br />
depreciation of about 3.2% during the period resulting in higher revenues for the<br />
sector. However, a weak PKR also led to 13% YoY increase in the import bill of the<br />
textile products. Going forward, we believe introduction of BT cotton and higher<br />
export prices for cotton and yarn would continue to encourage trade.<br />
Furthermore, incentives such as zero-rated exports, availability of low cost<br />
financing including export refinance (EFS) and Long-term Financing Facilities<br />
(LTFF) and export rebates would continue to act in the favour of local industry.<br />
At the same time, if Pakistan is awarded the General System of Preferences<br />
(GSP) Plus status from the EU, textile products from the country would be even<br />
more competitive in the international market.<br />
Nishat Mills Limited (NML) stands as our pick from the sector. The stock<br />
currently offers 38% potential upside to our SoTP based fair value of<br />
PKR63/share.
CHEMICALS<br />
MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Sana I. Bawani<br />
Chemicals Analyst<br />
25<br />
CHEMICALS: MIXED REACTION<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Contrary to market expectations, chemical sector remained largely unaffected<br />
from the new budget for FY11. No new policies were an<strong>no</strong>unced for the sector<br />
<strong>no</strong>r any incentives given as such. We believe the government aims to let the<br />
industry function in the present condition till VAT is enforced in Oct10.<br />
Duty reduction on raw material of pharmaceutical items<br />
One change brought about in Budget FY11 has been a reduction in duty to 5%<br />
on pharmaceutical raw materials and drugs. This is expected to lead to a<br />
reduction in prices of medicines based on imported raw materials. In addition,<br />
drug manufacturers including ICI would also benefit from lower production<br />
costs. However, the product would reach consumers with 1% additional sales<br />
tax, thereby, muting the impact of a reduction in duties on raw materials.<br />
Unchanged duty structure on PTA and PSF imports<br />
Duty on Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) remains unchanged at 7.5% since<br />
FY09 while on Polyester Staple Fibre (PSF) it currently stands at 4.5%. With<br />
expectations of a revision in both <strong>no</strong>t being materialized and continuation of<br />
zero-rating; we anticipate a positive response from the market. However,<br />
imposition of VAT in Oct10 would likely abolish zero-rating umbrella cover on<br />
textiles and thus bring the two products under the <strong>no</strong>rmal tariff structure from<br />
then onwards.<br />
Furthermore, raw materials for PTA imported by LOTPTA which includes<br />
Paraxylene (PX) and Acetic Acid continue to be zero-rated.<br />
Outlook FY11E<br />
PTA market remains dominated by LOTPTA, the sole domestic producer of<br />
PTA in the country, whereas, PSF is produced by 4 large companies including<br />
Ibrahim Fibres (IBFL) and ICI. LOTPTA would continue to benefit from the tariff<br />
protection while its margins would depend on international prices for PTA and<br />
PX. PX prices have been stable at USD1,020/ton since the last 2 months while<br />
PTA prices are expected to decline in the near future on the back of low prices<br />
for PTA futures and falling crude prices.<br />
We reiterate our BUY call on ICI, which offers 33% upside to our DCF-based<br />
fair value of PKR177/share. Diversified businesses, affiliation with the largest<br />
decorative paints manufacturer, Akzo Nobel, and a strong brand following are<br />
some of the factors which endorse our choice for the company as a value-pick<br />
at these levels. Not only this, but ICI has also continued to post gross margins<br />
in the vicinity of 20% and offers a dividend yield of 7.5% for CY11E.
AUTO<br />
MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Sana I. Bawani<br />
Auto Analyst<br />
26<br />
AUTO: GEARS UNCHANGED<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
While <strong>no</strong> new policies were an<strong>no</strong>unced for the local auto assemblers, import<br />
rules for used cars also remain unchanged. This suggests that the government<br />
neither aims to encourage more imports of cars <strong>no</strong>r does it intend to let go of its<br />
revenue from the locally assemebled cars. We believe the government has<br />
taken a step in the right direction as automobile is characterized as a luxury<br />
product and relaxation in its imports would have further burdedened the<br />
country’s BoP while a reduction in duties on CKD kits would <strong>no</strong>t necessarily<br />
have been passed on to the customers.<br />
Duties on CKD kits remain unchanged<br />
Contrary to industry expectations, Customs duty at 35% on CKD kits has been<br />
maintained for FY11. It is pertinent to <strong>no</strong>te that CKD kits are imported by all the<br />
4 listed auto assemblers for the manufacture of vehicles in the country. The<br />
imposition of this duty adds to their production costs however it is passed on to<br />
the customers in the shape of higher prices. Increase in demand during the year<br />
has resulted in production going up by 30% YoY to 110,612 units in 10MFY10<br />
against 85,051 units produced in 10MFY09.<br />
Duties on CBUs also remain unchanged<br />
Age limit on import of old CBUs has also been kept unchanged at 3 years,<br />
contrary to importers’ expectations of an increase in the same. An increase in<br />
the age limit of imported used cars would have encouraged greater imports and<br />
burdened the BoP position. At the same time, continuation of this restriction<br />
signals to the continued strength of auto assemblers in the domestic market.<br />
Furthermore, duties on imported CBUs also remain unchanged:<br />
Import Tariffs on CBUs<br />
Company Import Tariff<br />
Upto 800cc 50%<br />
800-1000cc 55%<br />
1000-1500cc 60%<br />
1500-1800cc 75%<br />
Source: Business Recorder, <strong>BMA</strong> Research<br />
Duty-free import of agricultural tractors<br />
Promotion of agriculture remains to be government’s key objective. For this<br />
reason, it has maintained duty exemption on import of agricultural tractors.<br />
During 10MFY10, tractor sales improved by 40% YoY to 57,749 units as various<br />
tractor schemes aided their offtakes.<br />
Increase in sales tax to increase car prices<br />
Increase in GST from 16% to 17% in the next fiscal year should lead to an<br />
increase in car prices from Jul 01, 10. Therefore, we expect May10 and Jun10<br />
offtake numbers to be on the higher side; during 10MFY10 auto sales have<br />
increased by 37% YoY to 110,752 units with INDU leading the pack with 50%<br />
YoY growth in sales to 40,062 units.
27<br />
Outlook FY11E<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Increased car prices, owing to higher GST, are expected to reduce the pace at<br />
which automobile sales have grown in the current year. We expect sales to<br />
clock in at 135,576 units in FY10E, up 38% from last year. However, sales<br />
growth is expected to be subdued in the following years to 8% and 9.5% in<br />
FY11E and FY12E.<br />
Additionally, the imposition of Value-Added Tax (VAT) from Oct 01, 10 in place<br />
of GST even at a reduced level (15%) is unlikely to bring about a downward<br />
revision in prices. We currently have an ADD stance on INDU with a DCFbased<br />
fair value of PKR288/share.<br />
Automobile Sales Expectations: FY10E-FY13E<br />
Company FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E FY13E<br />
PSMC 50,584 71,000 77,728 86,014 96,202<br />
INDU 34,146 50,000 54,000 58,860 58,860<br />
HCAR 11,144 14,000 14,700 15,582 16,673<br />
DFML 2,287 576 588 611 642<br />
Total 98,161 135,576 147,016 161,068 172,377<br />
Source: PAMA, <strong>BMA</strong> Research
TELECOM<br />
MARKETWEIGHT<br />
Budget Impact<br />
Neutral<br />
Omar Rafiq<br />
Telecom Analyst<br />
28<br />
TELECOM: SILENT TALKS!<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
Following a rapid expansion during the last 4-5 years, telecom sector of<br />
Pakistan has recently seen a stabilizing trend. Growth in the sector has matured<br />
on account of pervasive teledensity being already established, together with low<br />
ARPU (Average revenue per user) decreasing the attractiveness to lure new<br />
investments.<br />
Status-Quo<br />
Rampant growth in the telecom sector and its growing importance in the<br />
services industry have historically allowed the government to consider the<br />
sector for strengthening its revenue base via increased tax collection from<br />
telecom service providers. While teledensity has improved over the period, the<br />
trend has exhibited a decline. Growth rates for teledensity which clocked in at<br />
123% in FY07 tapered off to merely 6% during FY10.<br />
Thus recently slowed growth and an already over-burdened sector (21% GST<br />
applicable compared to 17% for general industries) have led the government to<br />
target other major avenues for boosting its revenue base.<br />
As a result of this, the current year’s budget had little to do with the telecom<br />
sector in general. No additional taxation or concessions were an<strong>no</strong>unced for the<br />
sector as it was possibly considered over stretched amidst a declining ARPU<br />
environment.<br />
Falling PSDP on IT development<br />
Although there exists a major consensus that future growth of the sector lies in<br />
value added reselling and IT based industry (rather than pure conventional<br />
telephony), PSDP allocation for the sector is expected to be declining in the<br />
coming fiscal year - as indicated by 35.8% reduction over FY10 to PKR718mn.<br />
As a result, growth can be expected to be potentially slower for telecom on<br />
account of lacklustre importance given to the sector.<br />
Increased tax on loss making entities; Wateen might bear the brunt<br />
It has been proposed that the government intends to increase tax rate for loss<br />
making organizations at a rate of 1% of revenues (compared to 0.5% earlier).<br />
As a result we may expect new entrants (e.g. Wateen) suffering from high<br />
depreciation (<strong>no</strong>n-cash charge) to be adversely hit.<br />
Outlook FY11E<br />
Our pick from the sector continues to be Pak Telecommunication Limited<br />
(PTCL), owing to its natural mo<strong>no</strong>polistic presence, low leverage, rich cash<br />
reserves and ever increasing array of products on offer. At current levels, the<br />
stock currently offers 46% upside to our SoTP based fair value of PKR29/share.
29<br />
Top Investment Ideas<br />
June 7, 2010
BUY<br />
Fair Value: PKR 242<br />
Current Price: PKR 192<br />
Stock Statistics<br />
Ticker MCB<br />
3-month High/ Low 216.3/ 174.9<br />
Mkt Cap USD mn 1,730<br />
12M ADT mn 1.5<br />
Beta 1.22<br />
MCB vs. KSE Relative Graph<br />
200<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
Volume mn(RHS) MCB KSE100<br />
Jun-09<br />
Jul-09<br />
Aug-09<br />
Sep-09<br />
Oct-09<br />
Nov-09<br />
Dec-09<br />
Jan-10<br />
Feb-10<br />
Mar-10<br />
Apr-10<br />
May-10<br />
Jun-10<br />
MCB profile: MCB is one of the<br />
leading banks of Pakistan. Incorporated<br />
in 1947, MCB was nationalized along<br />
with all other private sector banks in<br />
1974. During the last fifteen years, the<br />
Bank has concentrated on growth<br />
through improving service quality,<br />
utilizing its extensive branch network &<br />
developing a large and stable deposit<br />
base<br />
30<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
MCB Bank: Always a <strong>safe</strong> bet!<br />
Investment Summary<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
� Strong fundamentals: Despite tough conditions faced by the banking<br />
sector during the year, MCB has been able to maintain the highest NIMs in<br />
the sector at ~8%. This is thanks to an extensive branch network (3 rd<br />
largest) and highest CASA over its peers. Going forward as well, the bank<br />
can leverage this advantage with an aim to mobilize low cost deposits and<br />
<strong>hence</strong> maintain its NIMs. In addition, CASA is high at 83% which suggests<br />
lower risk to incremental pressure over deposits cost due to liquidity<br />
constraints.<br />
� Comfortable CAR & roomy ADR: MCB has extremely comfortable CAR at<br />
19.1% (Dec09) and roomy ADR at ~73% (Dec09) which bodes well for<br />
balance sheet growth going forward. Although we do <strong>no</strong>t see double digit<br />
growth in its loan book for CY10; better position for the same as credit risk<br />
subsides and high exposure to govt. securities ensure better asset quality<br />
and profitability compared to peers.<br />
� Winner on asset quality: Amongst top tier banks MCB has one of the best<br />
asset quality given relatively lower NPLs to gross loans at ~8.9% compared<br />
to <strong>BMA</strong> universe sector average of ~10%. Moreover, MCB has also<br />
witnessed considerable deceleration in its NPL accumulation on a quarterly<br />
basis. The full impact of this will be seen in CY10 where we expect<br />
provisions against NPLs to come off considerably resulting in significant<br />
bottom-line growth.<br />
� Maintained ROE: MCB also carries one of the highest ROEs (24%)<br />
amongst the Pakistani banks. Therefore, comfort is maintained for investors<br />
with respect to continued dividend payouts.<br />
� Pension fund reversals: MCB continues to benefit from pension fund<br />
reversals. The management forecasts a three year timeline for complete<br />
reversals to take place which will continue to provide relief through lower<br />
administrative expenses and relatively better cost to income ratio.<br />
Financials<br />
CY09A CY10E CY11E CY12E<br />
EPS(PKR) 20.55 23.16 24.88 29.39<br />
Price to book (x) 2.08 1.84 1.62 1.43<br />
Dividend Yield (%) 5% 6% 6% 8%<br />
EPS Growth (%) 13% 7% 18% 13%<br />
Return on Equity (%) 24% 23% 22% 23%<br />
Return on Assets (%) 3% 3% 3% 3%<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research
BUY<br />
Fair Value: PKR 282<br />
Current Price: PKR 221<br />
Stock Statistics<br />
Ticker POL<br />
3-month High/ Low 249.9/216.3<br />
Mkt Cap USD mn 618<br />
12M ADT mn 1.9<br />
Beta 1.13<br />
KSE vs POL Relative Graph<br />
200<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
Volume mn(RHS) POL KSE100<br />
Jun-09<br />
Jul-09<br />
Aug-09<br />
Sep-09<br />
Oct-09<br />
Nov-09<br />
Dec-09<br />
Jan-10<br />
Feb-10<br />
Mar-10<br />
Apr-10<br />
May-10<br />
Jun-10<br />
POL Profile: Pakistan Oilfields (POL)<br />
is engaged in oil and gas exploration in<br />
the country and has been investing<br />
independently and in joint ventures with<br />
various other exploration and production<br />
companies. In addition, it is also<br />
manufactures LPG, solvent oil and<br />
sulphur. The company is part of The<br />
Attock Oil Company Limited (OCAC) and<br />
holds 25% ownership stake in National<br />
Refinery Limited.<br />
31<br />
14.0<br />
12.0<br />
10.0<br />
8.0<br />
6.0<br />
4.0<br />
2.0<br />
0.0<br />
Pakistan Oilfields: Growth at its best<br />
Investment Summary<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
� Amidst materialization of production growth from TAL Block: POL’s<br />
performance over FY07-09 has stayed lacklustre as it posted dismal<br />
production data over the period, primarily on account of concerns in one of<br />
its key fields, Pindori (POL ownership stake: 35%). As a result, oil<br />
production for the company declined from 6.0kbpd in FY07 to 3.7kbpd in<br />
FY09 while gas production declined from 47mmcfd to 38mmcfd during the<br />
same time period.<br />
� However with POL accounting for 21% stake in Tal Block, the ongoing<br />
production additions are projected to turn around the company’s profile.<br />
Central Processing Facility has already come online (during 2QFY10) at<br />
Manzalai field, enhancing its oil and gas production to 200+mmcfd (up 4x)<br />
and around 4,000bpd (up 7x), respectively. Moreover Mamikhel and<br />
Maramzai being relatively recent discoveries are projected to come online<br />
during 1HFY11 with cumulative oil and gas production addition of 85mmcfd<br />
of gas and 3,000bpd of oil. As a result, we project POL to deliver an<br />
impressive oil and gas production growth of 18% and 89% respectively in<br />
FY10 while complete annualized impact of production additions will<br />
translate into further double-digit growth in FY11-12.<br />
� Benefits of Attock’s oil conglomerate: POL being the exploration arm of<br />
the Attock group’s portfolio derives part of the strength of its business<br />
model through an inherent shield against the system’s circular debt.<br />
Supplying a substantial portion of its production to the group’s refineries<br />
(Attock Refinery and National Refinery), the company has been able to<br />
sustain itself better than its peers (PPL and OGDC) in the current liquidity<br />
starved environment.<br />
� Moreover, POL owns 20mn shares (25% stake) of National Refinery<br />
Limited (NRL). Hence dividend income from the refinery arm will continue to<br />
add to cash flows and earnings for the company.<br />
� Double-digit EPS growth; Prospective Dividend Yield of 9% for FY11E:<br />
Offering robust EPS growth of 16% and 28% for FY10E and FY11E<br />
respectively, we project the company to post an EPS of PKR42/share for<br />
FY11. Moreover, backed by its rich cash reserves current prices also reflect<br />
prospective dividend yield of 9% for FY11E – the highest amongst its peers!<br />
Financials<br />
FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />
EPS(PKR) 23.8 27.5 35.3 41.9<br />
Price to Earnings (x) 9.3x 8.0x 6.3x 5.5x<br />
Dividend Yield (%) 8.1% 8.1% 9.1% 10.0%<br />
EPS Growth (%) -35% 16% 28% 19%<br />
Return on Equity (%) 20% 21% 23% 25%<br />
Return on Assets (%) 26% 17% 17% 20%<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research
BUY<br />
Fair Value: PKR 236<br />
Current Price: PKR 186<br />
Stock Statistics<br />
Ticker PPL<br />
3-month High/ Low 205.6/181.6<br />
Mkt Cap USD mn 2,194<br />
12M ADT mn 1.1<br />
Beta 1.12<br />
KSE vs PPL Relative Graph<br />
160<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
Volume mn(RHS) PPL KSE100<br />
Jun-09<br />
Jul-09<br />
Aug-09<br />
Sep-09<br />
Oct-09<br />
Nov-09<br />
Dec-09<br />
Jan-10<br />
Feb-10<br />
Mar-10<br />
Apr-10<br />
May-10<br />
Jun-10<br />
PPL Profile: Pakistan Petroleum (PPL)<br />
is amongst the older E&P companies of<br />
Pakistan. Besides being the largest gas<br />
producer of the country, it also produces<br />
crude oil, Natural Gas Liquid (NGL) and<br />
Liquifies Petroleum Gas (LPG).<br />
Government of Pakistan (GoP) holds<br />
78.4% of the company while the<br />
remaining is divided between<br />
International Finance Corporation and<br />
private investors.<br />
32<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Pakistan Petroleum: Where there’s will…<br />
Investment Summary<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
� Unrivalled exposure to Gas – invaluable in a declining oil price<br />
environment: Given that gas production accounts for 80%+ of PPL’s<br />
revenues, coupled with the fact that around 85% of this production is<br />
contributed by uncapped fields (namely Sui, Kandhkot, Sawan and Mia<strong>no</strong>),<br />
wellhead gas prices for these fields continue to be the single most important<br />
determinant of PPL’s profitability. Hence with the an<strong>no</strong>uncement of 25-30%<br />
increase in wellhead gas prices for these fields, the company stands to<br />
benefit from 34% HoH growth in its EPS for 2HFY10<br />
� More importantly, with wellhead gas prices benchmarked against trailing<br />
average intl crude oil prices, we expect the revenue stream for the company<br />
to stay stable in 1HFY11 even amidst declining global commodity markets<br />
� Declining Sui production profile – but still lower than our forecasts:<br />
Sui field (PPL ownership stake: 100%), the country’s largest gas producing<br />
field, has been posting natural annual production decline of 3-5%. While the<br />
market has shown concerns on recent 5% WoW decline in the field’s<br />
production, it needs to be highlighted that it was in-line with FY09 average<br />
statistics – thereby actually hinting towards annual depletion that is way<br />
lower than our assumption of 5% pa<br />
� Nonetheless, contributing to around 50% of PPL’s revenues, Sui is still a<br />
major concern for the company’s ongoing production and revenue stream.<br />
However, recent and upcoming oil and gas production additions from Tal<br />
Block have largely allayed these concerns.<br />
� We project PPL to post gas production growth of 1%, 4% and 4% for FY10,<br />
FY11 and FY12, respectively. Further, upcoming additions from Mela and<br />
Nashpa are projected to translate into oil production growth of 5% and 2%<br />
for the same time period.<br />
� Turning aggressive, finally! After staying relatively muted on the<br />
exploration front for the last 3 years, the company has finally unravelled its<br />
plans to explore untapped reserves in Pakistan. Plans to assess deeper<br />
prospects at Sui are underway to offset depleting reserves and enhance<br />
production efficiencies while an aggressive international exploration<br />
program (with JV partners) in Iraq, Iran, Yemen and other countries can<br />
provide further impetus to the growth story.<br />
Financials<br />
FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />
EPS(PKR) 27.8 23.4 28.0 29.0<br />
Price to Earnings (x) 6.7x 8.0x 6.6x 6.4x<br />
Dividend Yield (%) 5.8% 5.4% 6.4% 7.0%<br />
EPS Growth (%) 41% (16%) 20% 4%<br />
Return on Equity (%) 44% 31% 31% 31%<br />
Return on Assets (%) 32% 33% 26% 27%<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research
BUY<br />
Fair Value: PKR 409<br />
Current Price: PKR 271<br />
Stock Statistics<br />
Ticker PSO<br />
3-month High/ Low 320.8/255.0<br />
Mkt Cap USD mn 549<br />
12M ADT mn 1.0<br />
Beta 1.04<br />
KSE vs PSO Relative Graph<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
Volume mn(RHS) PSO<br />
KSE100<br />
180<br />
Jun-09<br />
Jul-09<br />
Aug-09<br />
Sep-09<br />
Oct-09<br />
Nov-09<br />
Dec-09<br />
Jan-10<br />
Feb-10<br />
Mar-10<br />
Apr-10<br />
May-10<br />
Jun-10<br />
PSO Profile: Pakistan State Oil (PSO)<br />
is the market leader in Pakistan’s energy<br />
sector. The company has the largest<br />
network of retail outlets to serve the<br />
automotive sector and is the major fuel<br />
supplier to aviation, railways, power<br />
projects, armed forces and agriculture<br />
sector. PSO also provides Jet Fuel to<br />
Refueling Facilities at 9 airports in<br />
Pakistan and ship fuel at 3 ports. The<br />
company is currently engaged in storage,<br />
distribution and marketing of various POL<br />
products. The company’s current market<br />
share of 83% in the black oil market and<br />
58% share in the white oil market, alone<br />
speak volumes about its success.<br />
33<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
Pakistan State Oil: Remains Attractive<br />
Investment Summary<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
� Attractive valuations despite its leadership position: PSO is currently<br />
trading at an enticing FY11E PER of 6.0x and offers a potential upside of<br />
51% to our DCF based fair value of PKR409/share.<br />
� It is the largest OMC in Pakistan with overall market share of 74% and<br />
dominates in almost all product segments particularly in High Speed Diesel<br />
(HSD) and Furnace Oil (FO) with market shares of 56% and 89%<br />
respectively.<br />
� Strong FO demand from the power sector: During 9MFY10, PSO<br />
de<strong>no</strong>minated a sizeable market share of 89% in FO sales with contribution<br />
from the product accounting for 43% towards gross sales of the company.<br />
PSO therefore continues to benefit the most from increasing FO demand<br />
from the power sector. With the new IPPs and RPPs coming online, we<br />
expect industry FO demand surge to continue with total demand to grow by<br />
10% over FY11.<br />
� We believe circular debt in the system should continue to hold back APL<br />
and Shell from regaining their market share; however any resolution in the<br />
issue would encourage these OMCs to re-enter the market. We have thus<br />
assumed a conservative market share of 87% for PSO by FY12E.<br />
� Mogas substituting CNG: During 9MFY10, Mogas sales clocked in at<br />
1,414K MT, depicting a tremendous YoY growth of 24%. This growth stems<br />
from 1) increased power outages and 2) CNG to MoGas substitution on the<br />
back of reduced Mogas-CNG price differential and gas load shedding. We<br />
expect this trend to continue with Mogas sales anticipated to clock in YoY<br />
growth of 23% and 5% for FY10E and FY11E respectively.<br />
� The trigger to look for - PSO stands to benefit the most from circular<br />
debt resolution: Owing to the working capital issues arising from the<br />
circular debt hazard, PSO reported colossal finance costs of PKR7.6bn<br />
during 9MFY10. The resolution of the circular debt can improve liquidity and<br />
payout of the company. More importantly, it has the potential to reduce<br />
annual financial charges for the company by 85%. However at present, we<br />
only foresee a gradual resolution of the crisis as electricity tariff hikes start<br />
to ease the liquidity crunch in the system.<br />
Financials<br />
FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />
EPS(PKR) (39.1) 52.3 45.3 55.2<br />
Price to Earnings (x) 3.4x 5.2x 6.0x 4.9x<br />
Dividend Yield (%) 7.3 1.2 1.0 1.3<br />
EPS Growth (%) NM NM -13.4 21.8<br />
Return on Equity (%) (32.0) 31.0 21.9 21.3<br />
Return on Assets (%) (4.4) 4.5 3.8 4.5<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research
BUY<br />
Fair Value: PKR 43<br />
Current Price: PKR 33<br />
Stock Statistics<br />
Ticker HUBC<br />
3-month High/ Low 35.3/ 31.1<br />
Mkt Cap USD mn 452<br />
12M ADT mn 0.7<br />
Beta 0.80<br />
KSE vs HUBC Relative Graph<br />
170<br />
155<br />
140<br />
125<br />
110<br />
95<br />
80<br />
Volume mn(RHS) HUBC KSE100<br />
Jun-09<br />
Jul-09<br />
Aug-09<br />
Sep-09<br />
Oct-09<br />
Nov-09<br />
Dec-09<br />
Jan-10<br />
Feb-10<br />
Mar-10<br />
Apr-10<br />
May-10<br />
Jun-10<br />
HUBC Profile: HUBC’s is an<br />
Independent Power Producer. Its<br />
principal business activity is to own,<br />
operate and maintain furnace oil based<br />
power generation. With current installed<br />
capacity of 1,292MW, the company is the<br />
second largest IPP of Pakistan.<br />
HUBC is in the process of setting up an<br />
additional 225MW thermal power plant at<br />
Narowal along with a 75% controlling<br />
stake in Laraib which is to set up an<br />
84MW Hydel power project by FY13.<br />
34<br />
10<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
HUB Power Company: For ever and a day<br />
Investment Summary<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
� Expansion, from strength to strength: Domestic electricity demand<br />
currently outstrips supply, as the gap is currently estimated at over<br />
3,500MW. The situation raises grave concerns for eco<strong>no</strong>mic growth but<br />
highlights potential opportunities for select players. HUBC is all set to<br />
capitalize on this opportunity with two additional power projects (i) 225MW<br />
Narowal Power project and (ii) 84MW Laraib Power Project.<br />
� While Narowal Power project got delayed by six months, it is expected to be<br />
commissioned by the end of 1QFY11. However , unless there is a wavier<br />
extended by the GoP/WAPDA, the company will be required to abide by the<br />
contractual liability of paying Liquidated Damages (LD) at the rate of<br />
USD17,800/day. A decent portion of LD is then reclaimable from EPC<br />
Contractor by way of contract between the company and the contractor.<br />
� The company is also the first in the private sector to venture into hydel<br />
power generation via its 75% recent acquisition in Laraib Energy Limited,<br />
located in Azad Kashmir. Based on envisaged 70:30 debt to equity ratio,<br />
the management plans to employ internally generated cash for equity<br />
investment and is well positioned to capitalize on 17% USD IRR guaranteed<br />
by the government. The plant is expected to come online in FY13 and will<br />
start adding to shareholder value from then onwards.<br />
� Tariff and indexation factors, Hedged bets: Given the U-shaped tariff<br />
structure of Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) governing HUBC, Dec08<br />
marked the trough for Project Company Equity (PCE) laid out for the<br />
company. Since then, the rise in PCE has been and is projected to result in<br />
increasing tariff and payout for HUBC. Additionally, with the tariff indexed in<br />
USD, any depreciation in Pak Rupee is projected to translate into<br />
proportional increase in bottom-line, cash payouts and fair value for the<br />
company.<br />
� Moreover, with debt repayment schedule being front-loaded for IPPs,<br />
HUBC has already retired the principal portion of its long-term debt for its<br />
original plant of 1,292MW. The remaining portion will be completely retired<br />
by FY16 – allowing the company to take additional debt for its upcoming<br />
expansions as well as sustain its dividend stream going forward.<br />
� Dividend payout, as fit as a fiddle: We have already priced in Narowal<br />
project’s delay implications, based on which our DPS projections stand at<br />
PKR4.5 and PKR5.5 for FY10E and FY11E, respectively. Current prices<br />
thus still reflect attractive prospective dividend yields of 14% and 17%<br />
respectively. In addition, the stock offers USD based IRR of 17% and<br />
reflects 30% upside to our DDM based fair value of PKR43/share.<br />
Financials<br />
FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />
EPS(PKR) 3.3 4.6 5.5 6.6<br />
Price to Earnings (x) 10.1 7.2 6.0 5.0<br />
Dividend Yield (%) 10.1 13.6 16.6 19.1<br />
EPS Growth (%) 45 40 21 20<br />
Return on Equity (%) 13 18 21 25<br />
Return on Assets (%) 4 8 9 11<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research
BUY<br />
Fair Value: PKR 232<br />
Current Price: PKR 182<br />
Stock Statistics<br />
Ticker ENGRO<br />
3-month High/ Low 212.8/ 166.6<br />
Mkt Cap USD mn 704<br />
12M ADT mn 2.3<br />
Beta 1.12<br />
KSE vs ENGRO Relative Graph<br />
200<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
Volume mn(RHS) ENGRO KSE100<br />
Jun-09<br />
Jul-09<br />
Aug-09<br />
Sep-09<br />
Oct-09<br />
Nov-09<br />
Dec-09<br />
Jan-10<br />
Feb-10<br />
Mar-10<br />
Apr-10<br />
May-10<br />
Jun-10<br />
ENGRO Profile: ENGRO Corporation<br />
(ENGRO) is soon to become the largest<br />
Urea producer in Pakistan with a name<br />
plate capacity of 2.3mtpa. The company<br />
has followed an aggressive growth<br />
strategy and <strong>no</strong>w operates in various<br />
business lines such as FMCG, chemical<br />
handling, polymer production and<br />
automation.<br />
35<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
ENGRO Corporation: Eggs in more than one basket<br />
Investment Summary<br />
� Diversification: ENGRO’s main advantage stems from its diversified and<br />
well entrenched business lines. The company operates in fertilizer, foods,<br />
energy, chemical, chemical handling and automation business. The<br />
company has recently gone through a demerger of its fertilizer operations<br />
thereby becoming a holding company to better manage debt/cash flows for<br />
its ventures and further expansionary needs.<br />
� Largest Indeed: The company’s current expansionary plant to set-up a<br />
1.3mtpa urea plant at Qadirpur is expected to make Engro the largest urea<br />
producer of the country. Further the company is to receive feed stock gas<br />
subsidy in excess of its counterparts up till 2020 (under the Fertilizer Policy<br />
of 2001) at USD0.70/mmbtu compared to USD1.2/mmbtu prevailing for its<br />
peers. Core margin differential for urea production is expected to be in the<br />
tune of 7% which is to boost the company’s profitability. This increase in<br />
core margin bodes well for the company’s ongoing growth orientation as it<br />
has more access to internally generated funds in a high interest rate<br />
environment.<br />
� Synergies: ENGRO benefits directly and indirectly from synergies existing<br />
between its business units. Chemical handling and polymer generate<br />
supply chain links, Engro Foods benefits indirectly through market<br />
penetration and brand recognition of the fertilizer operations while Engro<br />
EXIMP acts like a trading arm for the fertilizer operations and potentially for<br />
other subsidiaries. By CY11 it is expected that some of ENGRO’s<br />
subsidiaries will reach the maturity phase and start paying out dividends.<br />
This should help boost internal liquidity for the company and reduce<br />
reliance on external sources of financing for the company.<br />
Financials<br />
CY09A CY10E CY11E CY12E<br />
EPS(PKR) 12.07 15.09 23.30 34.94<br />
Price to Earnings (x) 15.0x 11.9x 6.4x 5.2x<br />
Dividend Yield (%) 7% 3% 2% 3%<br />
EPS Growth (%) (7%) 25% 88% 23%<br />
Return on Equity (%) 15% 15% 26% 28%<br />
Return on Assets (%) 5% 5% 9% 11%<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research
BUY<br />
Fair Value: PKR 98<br />
Current Price: PKR 66<br />
Stock Statistics<br />
Ticker ACPL<br />
3-month High/ Low 76.8/ 61.2<br />
Mkt Cap USD mn 68<br />
12M ADT mn 0.1<br />
Beta 0.93<br />
KSE vs ACPL Relative Graph<br />
170<br />
160<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
Volume mn(RHS) ACPL KSE100<br />
Jun-09<br />
Jul-09<br />
Aug-09<br />
Sep-09<br />
Oct-09<br />
Nov-09<br />
Dec-09<br />
Jan-10<br />
Feb-10<br />
Mar-10<br />
Apr-10<br />
May-10<br />
Jun-10<br />
ACPL Profile: Attock cement accounts<br />
for 4% of the country’s installed cement<br />
capacity; in the south-zone it is 2 nd only to<br />
LUCK. The company is part of the Attock<br />
Group which has thrived well in Pakistan.<br />
The company has managed to push its<br />
product well in the market where it trades<br />
at a premium compared to the<br />
competition and has managed to keep<br />
utilization rates well above the rest of the<br />
industry.<br />
36<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
Attock Cement: Ready Acoustics<br />
Investment Summary<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
� Product Premium: ACPL has consistently been able to market its product<br />
at a premium price owing to its superior quarrying quality, together with<br />
proactive marketing strategies. The company currently sells its product at a<br />
market premium of PKR25-30/bag at PKR300/bag. Its premium product has<br />
led to impressive demand for its product despite a higher price.<br />
� Low Leverage: ACPL benefits from a low leverage, as its profitability is <strong>no</strong>t<br />
hurt by high financial charges (unlike many of its peers). In the current high<br />
interest rate environment, debt servicing has led to severe curtailment of<br />
profitability for many cement manufacturers. The lower leverage also<br />
benefits the company’s liquidity as cash flow from operations are <strong>no</strong>t<br />
affected significantly by mi<strong>no</strong>r fluctuations in price and thus leads to an<br />
overall stability on the profitability front. The company has <strong>no</strong>t required<br />
short-term financing arrangements to bridge the gap between internally<br />
generated funds and cash requirements since FY06.<br />
� An<strong>no</strong>unced acquisition of Al-Abbas Cement (AACIL): <strong>Capital</strong>izing on<br />
cheap valuations and cash rich balance sheet, ACPL has already<br />
an<strong>no</strong>unced its interest in acquiring 74% equity stake in AACIL. The<br />
objective is to target the local and export markets with the lower quality<br />
brand at lower prices and thereby entering into a segment of the market<br />
previously untapped by ACPL. Further, the company wants to aggrandize<br />
its market share in the south of the country which is expected to bode well<br />
as demand for commercial and residential real estate is expected to<br />
improve given the rural urban migration as well as improving per capita<br />
earnings. Not to <strong>mention</strong> that the aforesaid acquisition should result in<br />
inherent tax advantages for ACPL, emanating from tax credit accumulated<br />
by AACIL.<br />
� Utilization: Despite a slum in cement demand locally, ACPL has managed<br />
to maintain its sales utilization at over 96%. More importantly, the company<br />
has managed this feat whilst charging premium price for its product. This<br />
has been made possible by focusing on exports as a means to achieve<br />
higher utilization levels. Its current location near the port allows for lower<br />
freight charges on cement exports which adds to the company’s competitive<br />
advantage in the international markets.<br />
Financials<br />
FY09A FY10E FY11E FY12E<br />
EPS(PKR) 17.2 14.1 17.9 19.2<br />
Price to Earnings (x) 3.4x 4.7x 3.7x 3.4x<br />
Dividend Yield (%) 7% 5% 8% 9%<br />
EPS Growth (%) 243% -18% 27% 7%<br />
Return on Equity (%) 31% 21% 23% 21%<br />
Return on Assets (%) 21% 16% 18% 17%<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research
BUY<br />
Fair Value: PKR 177<br />
Current Price: PKR 133<br />
Stock Statistics<br />
Ticker ICI<br />
3-month High/ Low 166.3/125.6<br />
Mkt Cap USD mn 218<br />
12M ADT mn 0.2<br />
Beta 0.96<br />
KSE vs ICI Relative Graph<br />
160<br />
150<br />
140<br />
130<br />
120<br />
110<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
Volume mn(RHS) ICI KSE100<br />
Jun-09<br />
Jul-09<br />
Aug-09<br />
Sep-09<br />
Oct-09<br />
Nov-09<br />
Dec-09<br />
Jan-10<br />
Feb-10<br />
Mar-10<br />
Apr-10<br />
May-10<br />
Jun-10<br />
ICI Profile: ICI manufactures and sells<br />
a wide range of industrial and consumer<br />
products in Polyester, Soda Ash, Paints,<br />
Chemicals and Life Sciences segments.<br />
A partnership with AkzoNobel, world's<br />
largest decorative and performance<br />
coatings company, has further added to<br />
ICI's operational and product efficiencies<br />
37<br />
3.5<br />
3.0<br />
2.5<br />
2.0<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
ICI Pakistan: Go for it!<br />
Investment Summary<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
� A downtrend at the KSE in recent months pulled down ICI’s stock price to<br />
PKR133/share from its high of PKR181/share in Feb10. However, we<br />
believe that the stock is significantly undervalued at current levels; we have<br />
a DCF-based fair value of PKR177/share for the stock reflecting 33%<br />
upside from current levels<br />
� Diversified Businesses: ICI Pakistan stands to benefit from its strategy of<br />
diversification in its product portfolio and offers high-margin products<br />
including paints, life sciences products and chemicals. Simultaneously, it is<br />
a market leader in Soda Ash and Polyester Staple Fibre (PSF) in Pakistan.<br />
The company’s revenues have increased at a 3yr CAGR of 7% to CY09<br />
while its gross margins have remained in the vicinity of 20%. Given the<br />
diversification in business activities we expect ICI to show a consistent<br />
growth in its sales and profits going forward.<br />
� PSF – the Revenue Driver: PSF contributes 49% to the company’s total<br />
revenue while it earned a gross margin of 9% for the company in 1QCY10.<br />
ICI is the second largest producer of PSF in the country after Ibrahim Fibres<br />
(IBFL). PSF prices averaged at PKR133/kg in the 1QCY10 while after<br />
increasing to PKR138/kg in May10 it has come back to PKR134/kg at<br />
present. The onset of summer season and 15% RD on yarn exports during<br />
the quarter are the key reasons for a slightly subdued demand for the<br />
product during the ongoing quarter leading to a decline in its prices.<br />
However, peaking cotton prices have lately led spinners to tilt their mix<br />
towards polyester for blended yarn. Therefore, we believe ICI’s PSF<br />
segment would continue to benefit from high utilization rates and a regular<br />
clientele going forward. Also, expected declines in the prices of its raw<br />
materials including PTA and MEG are expected to lead to better margins for<br />
the company in case PSF prices also hold strong during the same period.<br />
� Soda Ash – ICI, the market leader: Soda Ash is the second major<br />
contributor to ICI Pakistan's revenue and also yields margins around 30%.<br />
However, in 1QCY10 the segment’s gross margin drastically dropped to 8%<br />
on the back of high costs of energy. We believe ICI would continue to<br />
benefit from stability in its soda ash sales in CY10 on the back of consistent<br />
demand from the downstream industry in the local as well as export<br />
markets.<br />
� Prudent Cash <strong>Management</strong>: One of the key stones for ICI has been its<br />
low debt levels and adequate management of its working capital<br />
requirement. Improving cash balance (PKR3.6bn as of Mar10) has led to an<br />
improvement in ICI’s other income to PKR144mn in 1QCY10 compared to<br />
PKR41mn in the same period last year.<br />
Financials<br />
CY09A CY10E CY11E CY12E<br />
EPS(PKR) 14.7 16.4 20.3 23.9<br />
Price to Earnings (x) 9.0x 8.1x 6.5x 5.6x<br />
Dividend Yield (%) 6% 6% 8% 8%<br />
EPS Growth (%) 10% 11% 24% 18%<br />
Return on Equity (%) 14% 15% 16% 17%<br />
Return on Assets (%) 10% 9% 11% 12%<br />
Source: <strong>BMA</strong> Research
38<br />
DISCLAIMER<br />
June 7, 2010<br />
This memorandum is produced by <strong>BMA</strong> <strong>Capital</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Limited and is<br />
only for the use of their clients. While the information contained herein is from<br />
sources believed reliable, we do <strong>no</strong>t represent that it is accurate or complete<br />
and should <strong>no</strong>t be relied upon as such. Opinions expressed may be revised at<br />
any time. This memorandum is for information only and is <strong>no</strong>t an offer to buy or<br />
sell, or solicitation of any offer to buy or sell the securities <strong>mention</strong>ed.<br />
ANALYST CERTIFICATION<br />
We, Hamad Aslam, Abdul Shakur, Nurali Barkatali, Sana I. Bawani, Omar Rafiq<br />
and Ali Taufiq, hereby certify that this report represents our personal opinions<br />
and analysis of information. All views are accurately expressed to the best of<br />
our k<strong>no</strong>wledge. We certify that <strong>no</strong> part of our remuneration is linked either<br />
directly or indirectly to recommendations or analysis covered in this report.