Session 3_NRC Fundamentals of Emergency ... - National REP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Two Entry Conditions • Failure to Comply An EP program is noncompliant with a regulatory requirement (e.g., 16 planning standard, Appendix E) • Associated with preparedness issues rather than response issues. • Typically identified during routine program inspections • Failure to Implement A finding during an actual event in which a failure to comply precluded effective implementation of program elements • Associated with response issues rather than preparedness issues. 122
Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPSs) • Origins of the RSPSs – During the development of the EP Cornerstone, the most risk-significant EP elements were identified as being distinct from other EP elements – Developed by a group of EP subject matter experts, including NRC staff and industry stakeholders, with input from members of the public – EP SDP methodology recognizes findings in the identified risk-significant elements as being more significant • Classification - (b)(4); Emergency Action Level Classification Scheme • Notification - (b)(5); Prompt notification of offsite officials and the public • Dose Assessment - (b)(9); Dose assessment capabilities • Protective Action Recommendations - (b)(10); Range of protective actions for 10 mile EPZ 123
Page 1 and 2:
Fundamentals of Emergency Preparedn
Page 3 and 4:
Meet your presenter… • NRC - 20
Page 5 and 6:
Role of the NRC in the Federal Gove
Page 7 and 8:
Departments • Heads of executive
Page 9 and 10:
Independent Agencies • “Indepen
Page 11 and 12:
The Commission • NRC headed by fi
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction and History of Emergen
Page 15 and 16:
What is Emergency Preparedness? •
Page 17 and 18:
Regulations • What are adequate m
Page 19 and 20:
Why prepare? • Prudent - Prepare
Page 21 and 22:
Pre-TMI History of EP Requirements
Page 23 and 24:
History of EP Requirements Pre-TMI
Page 25 and 26:
History of EP Requirements Pre-TMI
Page 28 and 29:
History of EP Requirements - TMI
Page 30 and 31:
History of EP Requirements • 1982
Page 32 and 33:
History of EP Requirements Seabrook
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
BREAK
Page 40 and 41:
Topics: • Defense-in-Depth • Pr
Page 42 and 43:
Planning Philosophy • Planning re
Page 44 and 45:
EPA-400 • “Manual of Protective
Page 46 and 47:
PAGs • Established by the EPA and
Page 48 and 49:
Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ • Area
Page 51 and 52:
Duane Arnold Energy Center Cedar Ra
Page 54:
Prompt Public Notification • Aler
Page 57 and 58:
Brief History of EPZs • 1970s - D
Page 59 and 60:
Relationship between PAGs and EPZs
Page 61 and 62:
Technical Support Center (TSC) - Re
Page 63 and 64:
Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)
Page 65 and 66:
Offsite EP • Joint Information Ce
Page 67 and 68:
Emergency Classifications • Unusu
Page 69 and 70:
Site Area Emergency Definition •
Page 71 and 72: Emergency Classifications • No re
Page 73 and 74: Initiating Conditions • Predeterm
Page 75 and 76: NEXT EP Regulations and Guidance EP
Page 77 and 78: EP Regulations and Guidance EP Insp
Page 79 and 80: EP Regulations and Guidance • 10
Page 81 and 82: 10 CFR 50.54(q) • §50.54, Condit
Page 83 and 84: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) Primary responsi
Page 85 and 86: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(3) Arrangements for
Page 87 and 88: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) Procedures have
Page 89 and 90: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(7) Information is m
Page 91 and 92: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(9) Adequate methods
Page 93 and 94: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(11) Means for contr
Page 95 and 96: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(13) General plans f
Page 97 and 98: 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) Radiological em
Page 99 and 100: 10 CFR 50.54(t) • Periodic review
Page 101 and 102: NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 • “Criter
Page 103 and 104: NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 • Appendix
Page 105 and 106: Alternate EAL Schemes • Products
Page 107 and 108: EP Inspection Program and Enforceme
Page 109 and 110: Regulatory Framework NRC Overall Sa
Page 111 and 112: Finding Colors / Significance Level
Page 113 and 114: Emergency Preparedness Performance
Page 115 and 116: DEP PI Example 115
Page 117 and 118: ERO PI Example 117
Page 119 and 120: ANS PI Example 119
Page 121: Significance Determination Process
Page 125 and 126: BREAK
Page 127 and 128: Topics: • Role of FEMA • Backgr
Page 129 and 130: FEMA/DHS Time Line • 1978 - Creat
Page 131 and 132: FEMA/DHS Time Line (continued) •
Page 133 and 134: Reasonable Assurance • Following
Page 135 and 136: Offsite Emergency Preparedness •
Page 137 and 138: Reasonable Assurance • Emergency
Page 139 and 140: Exercises • Primary means used by
Page 141 and 142: FEMA Deficiencies • Handling of E
Page 143 and 144: Withdrawal of Reasonable Assurance
Page 145 and 146: Realism Rule • What happens if a
Page 147 and 148: Seabrook Siren Trucks 147
Page 149 and 150: The NRC/FEMA Interface • Memorand
Page 151 and 152: MOU for Radiological Emergency Plan
Page 153 and 154: FEMA/NRC Steering Committee - Addre
Page 155 and 156: Regional Assistance Committee (RAC)
Page 157 and 158: NRC/FEMA Relationship • Hurricane
Page 159 and 160: Research and Test Reactor (RTR) EP
Page 161 and 162: Fuel Cycle Facility EP • NUREG-11
Page 163 and 164: EP Going Forward
Page 165 and 166: EP Rulemaking: The Future of EP •
Page 167 and 168: Revision to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 -
Page 169 and 170: Performance Based EP - Commission D
Page 171 and 172: Outreach • EP - the link between
Page 173 and 174:
Contact Information Robert Kahler O
show all

Session 3_NRC Fundamentals of Emergency ... - National REP

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?