Session 3_NRC Fundamentals of Emergency ... - National REP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

History of EP Requirements • 1982 – FEMA finds State/local plans deficient for Indian Point 2/3 – Westchester County evacuation uncertainties – Rockland County refusal to participate in drill • State of New York substituted for Rockland County – Commission voted 3-2 to allow operation – NRC staff discussed creation of 2-mile “prompt” action zone within EPZ – Congress did not approve 30
History of EP Requirements • 1982 – Shoreham – Consultant concluded 10 mile EPZ was inadequate • 25% of residents would leave island – Suffolk County Executive and New York Governor (Cuomo) refused to cooperate with emergency planning efforts – Long Island Lighting Co (LILCO) argued State/local agencies were misusing NRC’s regulations • 1986 – Seabrook – Controversy of evacuation/sheltering of beaches – MA refused to participate in exercise, would not prepare plans – Utility requested exemption to NRC’s rules • Argued 2 mile EPZ was sufficient • 1986 – Chernobyl 31
Page 1 and 2: Fundamentals of Emergency Preparedn
Page 3 and 4: Meet your presenter… • NRC - 20
Page 5 and 6: Role of the NRC in the Federal Gove
Page 7 and 8: Departments • Heads of executive
Page 9 and 10: Independent Agencies • “Indepen
Page 11 and 12: The Commission • NRC headed by fi
Page 13 and 14: Introduction and History of Emergen
Page 15 and 16: What is Emergency Preparedness? •
Page 17 and 18: Regulations • What are adequate m
Page 19 and 20: Why prepare? • Prudent - Prepare
Page 21 and 22: Pre-TMI History of EP Requirements
Page 23 and 24: History of EP Requirements Pre-TMI
Page 25 and 26: History of EP Requirements Pre-TMI
Page 28 and 29: History of EP Requirements - TMI
Page 32 and 33: History of EP Requirements Seabrook
Page 34 and 35: History of EP Requirements • 1992
Page 36 and 37: History of EP Requirements • 2004
Page 38 and 39: BREAK
Page 40 and 41: Topics: • Defense-in-Depth • Pr
Page 42 and 43: Planning Philosophy • Planning re
Page 44 and 45: EPA-400 • “Manual of Protective
Page 46 and 47: PAGs • Established by the EPA and
Page 48 and 49: Plume Exposure Pathway EPZ • Area
Page 51 and 52: Duane Arnold Energy Center Cedar Ra
Page 54: Prompt Public Notification • Aler
Page 57 and 58: Brief History of EPZs • 1970s - D
Page 59 and 60: Relationship between PAGs and EPZs
Page 61 and 62: Technical Support Center (TSC) - Re
Page 63 and 64: Emergency Operations Facility (EOF)
Page 65 and 66: Offsite EP • Joint Information Ce
Page 67 and 68: Emergency Classifications • Unusu
Page 69 and 70: Site Area Emergency Definition •
Page 71 and 72: Emergency Classifications • No re
Page 73 and 74: Initiating Conditions • Predeterm
Page 75 and 76: NEXT EP Regulations and Guidance EP
Page 77 and 78: EP Regulations and Guidance EP Insp
Page 79 and 80: EP Regulations and Guidance • 10
Page 81 and 82:
10 CFR 50.54(q) • §50.54, Condit
Page 83 and 84:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(1) Primary responsi
Page 85 and 86:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(3) Arrangements for
Page 87 and 88:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(5) Procedures have
Page 89 and 90:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(7) Information is m
Page 91 and 92:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(9) Adequate methods
Page 93 and 94:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(11) Means for contr
Page 95 and 96:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(13) General plans f
Page 97 and 98:
10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) Radiological em
Page 99 and 100:
10 CFR 50.54(t) • Periodic review
Page 101 and 102:
NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 • “Criter
Page 103 and 104:
NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 • Appendix
Page 105 and 106:
Alternate EAL Schemes • Products
Page 107 and 108:
EP Inspection Program and Enforceme
Page 109 and 110:
Regulatory Framework NRC Overall Sa
Page 111 and 112:
Finding Colors / Significance Level
Page 113 and 114:
Emergency Preparedness Performance
Page 115 and 116:
DEP PI Example 115
Page 117 and 118:
ERO PI Example 117
Page 119 and 120:
ANS PI Example 119
Page 121 and 122:
Significance Determination Process
Page 123 and 124:
Risk Significant Planning Standards
Page 125 and 126:
BREAK
Page 127 and 128:
Topics: • Role of FEMA • Backgr
Page 129 and 130:
FEMA/DHS Time Line • 1978 - Creat
Page 131 and 132:
FEMA/DHS Time Line (continued) •
Page 133 and 134:
Reasonable Assurance • Following
Page 135 and 136:
Offsite Emergency Preparedness •
Page 137 and 138:
Reasonable Assurance • Emergency
Page 139 and 140:
Exercises • Primary means used by
Page 141 and 142:
FEMA Deficiencies • Handling of E
Page 143 and 144:
Withdrawal of Reasonable Assurance
Page 145 and 146:
Realism Rule • What happens if a
Page 147 and 148:
Seabrook Siren Trucks 147
Page 149 and 150:
The NRC/FEMA Interface • Memorand
Page 151 and 152:
MOU for Radiological Emergency Plan
Page 153 and 154:
FEMA/NRC Steering Committee - Addre
Page 155 and 156:
Regional Assistance Committee (RAC)
Page 157 and 158:
NRC/FEMA Relationship • Hurricane
Page 159 and 160:
Research and Test Reactor (RTR) EP
Page 161 and 162:
Fuel Cycle Facility EP • NUREG-11
Page 163 and 164:
EP Going Forward
Page 165 and 166:
EP Rulemaking: The Future of EP •
Page 167 and 168:
Revision to NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1 -
Page 169 and 170:
Performance Based EP - Commission D
Page 171 and 172:
Outreach • EP - the link between
Page 173 and 174:
Contact Information Robert Kahler O
show all

Session 3_NRC Fundamentals of Emergency ... - National REP

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?