planning a governance assessment - United Nations Development ...

The first project period from June 2004 to March 2006, was a follow-up project to the Fifth International Conference of New
and Restored Democracies (ICRND), carried a total price tag of US$530,300 and had multiple donors, of which USAID was the
most important. The budget was divided into eight outputs:
• $135,621 was allocated to build consensus on the avenues of strengthening the ICNRD follow-up mechanisms and
processes, and on implementation and monitoring strategies for the Ulaanbaatar Declaration and Plan of Action, as well
as international sharing of Mongolia’s experience in democratic governance building and its national ICNRD5 follow-up
action plan. Costs here were mostly related to communication, communication material and international travel.
• $32,000 was allocated to on-going democratic governance programme. Reviews and consultations were held to
identify the gaps and missing links to develop a Mongolia national action plan. Costs here were mostly related to
research and studies.
• $56,800 was allocated to design and implement a pilot project on democratic governance indicators, with technical
advice from UNDP, its Bureau of Development Policy (BDP), and its Oslo Governance Centre (OGC). Here most of the costs
were related to subcontracting national research institutions and secondly on audio-visual productions used in
consultations.
• $70,767 were allocated to design and implement a broadly consultative and participatory activity for the preparation of
the Country Information Note, which was based on the guidelines developed with UNDP/BDP support and drawing
from work on democratic governance indicators. Most costs here were allocated to transportation and daily allowances
of participants, but also $10,000 was spent on studies and research.
• $6,050 was allocated to website maintenance.
• $155,660 was allocated to develop the capacity of government, including parliamentary strengthening.
Most costs were allocated to international consultants, but they also covered salaries of several local staff and office
operational costs such as stationery.
• $28,679 was allocated to dissemination of the results.
• Finally, $15,009 was allocated to providing professional services such as auditing.
The second phase of the project (2007-2008) aimed to strengthen democratic processes through participatory democracy
assessment and MDG9, using a set of institutionalized democratic governance indicators designed to improve policy and
practice. Similar to the first phase, democratic governance indicators formed a means, rather than an end, which accounts
for some of the greater costs compared with assessments that are more stand-alone and less embedded in a long-term
political process. The implementing agency was the Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law at the Mongolian Academy
of Science, a local research institute.
This second phase was funded by the United Nations Democracy Fund (UNDEF) and carried a total price tag of US$238,350.
The budget was divided into 4 outputs:
• $120,000 was allocated to streamline democratic governance indicators and develop a set of specific target indicators
to assess democracy and MDG9 and obtain approval by the Government. Of this sum $44,000 was allocated to research
produced by national consultants, $18,500 to an international consultant, $12,000 to consultations and $17,000 to
training of local researchers and participation in international conferences.
Planning a Governance Assessment: A Guide to Approaches, Costs and Benefits
37