planning a governance assessment - United Nations Development ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• $15,000 was allocated for government interventions for achieving MDG9 defined. Costs here relate to analysis and policy recommendations by national consultants on ongoing and future MDG9 interventions and their relevance to MDGs 1 through 8 as well as consultations on interventions. • $44,000 was allocated for designing, implementing and institutionalizing an independent monitoring and reporting system on the implementation of MDG9. Costs here include setting up an oversight and reporting body comprised of government representatives, preparation of a MDG9 chapter in the statistical yearbook by the NSO and assistance in preparation of the national MDG report published in 2007. • Finally, $28,000 was allocated for facilitation of a nationwide dialogue on MDG9-related issues and a strengthening of national advocacy capacity. Costs here relate to securing participation and materials. As mentioned above, the UNDP Oslo Governance Centre will continue to collect more detailed information on the costs of country-led governance of assessments and update this section as the information becomes available. Country-led assessments should keep detailed information on costs and make this information public, thereby increasing transparency and legitimacy. Overview of selected governance assessments The table below provides information on exiting governance assessments. As more information becomes available through UNDP, this portion of the guide will be updated. Overview of Governance Assessment Frameworks for Country-led Assessments Organization Broad or narrow definition Afrobarometer Broad, 100 indicators covering governance and democracy Coverage Stakeholder participation Cost De jure, de facto, or both Primarily de facto Data source(s) Type of data collected 18 countries Moderate, some country specific questions Moderate Typical citizen surveys conducted by independent research organizations Primarily quantitative data from structured questionnaires The DIAL 1-2-3 Broad, 100 indicators covering governance and democracy Urban areas of 10 countries in sub- Saharan Africa and Latin America Limited to the NSOs Moderate Primarily de facto Survey of typical citizens, both objective and subjective indicators Primarily quantitative from structured questionnaires 38 Planning a Governance Assessment: A Guide to Approaches, Costs and Benefits
Overview of Governance Assessment Frameworks for Country-led Assessments (continued) Organization Mongolia Governance Project National Integrity Systems (NIS) produced by Transparency International Transparency International CPI Urban Governance Index World Governance Assessment World Bank Institute Broad or narrow definition Broad, uses IDEA framework 131 indicators Broad, up to 300 indicators Narrow, focuses mostly on public sector corruption Broad, 25 indicators Broad, 42 indicators Broad, 6 sectors examined Coverage Case study, 1 country High High De facto and de jure 8 countries Moderate Moderate varies 180 countries None or very limited Unknown De facto and de jure De facto and de jure Moderate Low Mostly de facto Desk study and surveys of key stakeholders and typical citizens Index Index, uses data collected by other organizations. The number of sources varies widely Questionnaires and output of one- to two-day meetings of stakeholders 23 countries Low to moderate Low De facto Scale, survey of key stakeholders from 10 groups 212 countries Stakeholder participation None or very limited Cost Unknown De jure, de facto, or both De facto and de jure Data source(s) Index, uses data collected by other organizations. The number of sources varies widely Type of data collected Perception and objective data. Qualitative and quantitative Varies depending on the sourcereported events, experts, business surveys. Qualitative, narrative and quantitative Qualitative – objective and subjective Quantitative and qualitative perceptionbased data, as well as a desk study Quantitative and qualitative perceptionbased data, as well as a desk study Varies depending on source – reported events, experts, and business surveys. Qualitative, narrative and quantitative Planning a Governance Assessment: A Guide to Approaches, Costs and Benefits 39
Page 1: PLANNING A GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT A
Page 4 and 5: PLANNING A GOVERNANCE ASSESSMENT: A
Page 6 and 7: Section 7: Indicators - Existing vs
Page 8 and 9: Acknowledgments UNDP acknowledges w
Page 10 and 11: technical aspects of conducting a g
Page 12 and 13: Who participates? Who is included i
Page 14 and 15: Section 2 Governance Researchers Ov
Page 16 and 17: Section 3 Funding and Technical Ass
Page 18 and 19: This fund is increasingly emphasizi
Page 20 and 21: An integrated process It is importa
Page 22 and 23: Key stakeholder surveys are assessm
Page 24 and 25: Section 5 Types of Data and Data Co
Page 26 and 27: Internet surveys require special pl
Page 28 and 29: Theory should guide research and th
Page 30 and 31: 4. The Urban Governance Index (UGI)
Page 32 and 33: Proxy indicators do not measure the
Page 34 and 35: If the steering committee feels the
Page 36 and 37: Section 8 Sampling - The Basics Eve
Page 38 and 39: Section 9 Data Analysis and Present
Page 40 and 41: Stakeholders’ role in the data an
Page 42 and 43: Section 11 Comparing Approaches and
Page 44 and 45: One of the main strengths of this a
Page 48 and 49: Section Conclusion 12 Governance ma
Page 50 and 51: • Choosing the type or types of i
Page 52: Websites International Household Su

planning a governance assessment - United Nations Development ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?