Planning Committee - 2nd July 2013 - Newark and Sherwood ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

hard surfacing materials; minor artefacts and structures for example, furniture, play equipment, refuse or other storage units, signs, lighting etc.) proposed and existing functional services above and below ground (for example, drainage power, communications cables, pipelines etc. indicating lines, manholes, supports etc.) retained historic landscape features and proposals for restoration, where relevant. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and biodiversity. 08 The access shall be constructed and surfaced in a bound material in accordance with dwg. no. 12/052-02 and no other part of the development shall be commenced until the access has been completed in accordance with those plans. Reason: In the interests of highway safety. 09 No part of the development hereby permitted shall be brought into use until the drive is surfaced in a hard bound material (not loose gravel) for a minimum of 5 metres behind the Highway boundary. The surfaced drive shall then be maintained in such hard bound material for the life of the development. Reason: To reduce the possibility of deleterious material being deposited on the public highway (loose stones etc). 10 No part of the development hereby permitted shall be brought into use until the parking/turning areas are provided in accordance with the approved plan 12/052-02. The parking/turning areas shall not be used for any purpose other than parking/turning of vehicles. Reason: In the interests of highway safety. 11 No part of the development hereby permitted shall be brought into use until the access driveway/parking/turning areas are constructed with provision to prevent the unregulated discharge of surface water from the driveway/parking/turning areas to the public highway in accordance with details first submitted to and approved in writing by the LPA. The provision to prevent the unregulated discharge of surface water to the public highway shall then be retained for the life of the development. 28
Reason: To ensure surface water from the site is not deposited on the public highway causing danger to highway users. 12 The development permitted by this planning permission shall be carried out in accordance with the approved Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) and the following mitigation measures detailed within the FRA: 1. Utilising SuDS measures to manage surface water, including soakaways and permeable paving. 2. Locating the buildings within Flood Zone 1 as to keep the development safe from flooding and not increase flood risk to others. 3. Provision of an emergency egress route from the site direct to Quaker Lane as described in paragraphs 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8. The mitigation measures shall be fully implemented prior to occupation and subsequently in accordance with the timing / phasing arrangements embodied within the scheme, or within any other period as may subsequently be agreed, in writing, by the local planning authority. Reason: To prevent flooding and an increase of flood risk elsewhere and to provide a safe means of egress from the proposed development. 13 The development hereby approved shall be carried out in strict accordance with the mitigation and compensation measures and further survey recommendations as detailed within Section 6 of the submitted Ecological Walk-over Survey prepared by EMEC Ecology (dated April 2012). Reason: To protect the ecological interests of the site in accordance with Core Strategy Core Policy 12 Biodiversity and Green Infrastructure 14 Prior to commencement of development a scheme shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The scheme shall identify details associated with the location, size, appearance, and functionality of the electronic gates, the proposed associated signage and details of their implementation. The approved scheme shall be implemented prior to the construction of the 2.no dwellings in order to ensure that the same safeguards are in place throughout the construction period as well as ‘post development’ Reason: To protect the visual amenity of the area and to ensure that pedestrians and vehicles can safely utilise the public footpath. 29
Page 1 and 2: 22 October 2012 Telephone: (016
Page 3: discussion of these items. NIL
Page 6 and 7: application on the grounds that the
Page 8 and 9: change to the design would impact o
Page 10 and 11: eceived within three months. The Bu
Page 12 and 13: Appraisal as significant unlisted b
Page 14 and 15: The Proposal The application is a r
Page 16 and 17: • Electric (push button) gates ei
Page 18 and 19: Consultations Farnsfield Parish Cou
Page 20 and 21: Street where the buildings are clos
Page 22 and 23: overshadowing. I am aware of the ex
Page 24 and 25: incorporates a tree survey, propose
Page 26 and 27: RECOMMENDATION Approve, subject to
Page 30 and 31: Notes to applicant 01 As part of th
Page 32: • Policy 26 (Protecting and Enhan
Page 36 and 37: The building is rectangular in shap
Page 38 and 39: low standard or where it fails to u
Page 40 and 41: 06 The approved landscaping shall b
Page 43 and 44: PLANNING COMMITTEE 30 th October 20
Page 45 and 46: Consultations Newark Town Council s
Page 47: Colin Walker Director - Growth 47
Page 50 and 51: The Proposal Planning permission is
Page 52 and 53: o Strategic location o Greenfield o
Page 54 and 55: The approach to the Sequential Test
Page 56: For further information, please con
Page 60 and 61: statutory development plan and it r
Page 62 and 63: Turning to need, Spatial Policy 3 f
Page 65 and 66: PLANNING COMMITTEE - 30 OCTOBER 201
Page 67 and 68: statutory development plan and it r
Page 69 and 70: away from the commercial uses first
Page 71 and 72: Conclusion For the reasons I set ou
Page 73 and 74: Means of enclosure (including heigh
Page 75 and 76: REASONS FOR APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE
Page 79 and 80:
PLANNING COMMITTEE - 30 OCTOBER 201
Page 81 and 82:
• Spatial Policy 1 - Settlement H
Page 83 and 84:
that a footprint of the size indica
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Newark and Sherwood Core Strategy D
Page 91 and 92:
• Removal of trees will deprive r
Page 93 and 94:
Details of the access, appearance,
Page 97 and 98:
PLANNING COMMITTEE- 30 October 2012
Page 99 and 100:
Newark and Sherwood Local Plan (ado
Page 101 and 102:
impact on the future of the school
Page 103 and 104:
The Local Planning Authority has no
Page 105 and 106:
105
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix 1 Kevin Rontree 8 MOOR ROA
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix 2 109
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix 2 111
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Occupiers of 4 neighbouring propert
Page 117 and 118:
on will exacerbate the flood risk t
Page 119 and 120:
albeit sharing part of the access w
Page 121 and 122:
121
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Cllr N Armstrong has referred this
Page 127 and 128:
Reason: To comply with the requirem
Page 129 and 130:
129
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Appeal reference Application number
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Appeal Decision Site visit made on
Page 139 and 140:
Appeal Decision APP/B3030/A/12/2176
Page 141 and 142:
Appeal Decision APP/B3030/A/12/2176
show all

Planning Committee - 2nd July 2013 - Newark and Sherwood ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?