Evaluation of the effectiveness of the New Instruments of ... - CORDIS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Oversubscription has increased significantly in comparison with FP5. There are however big differences among the Priorities Thematic Areas (PTAs). Oversubscription - FP6 all priorities all types SSA Ca STREPs NoE IP 0 2 4 6 8 10 Industrial participation has gone down significantly. The low number of industrial participants in NoEs is one of the factors explaining this change, but not the only one. Industry participation in % all types SSA Ca STREPs % NoE IP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 32
2. Situation of new instruments in each priority Thematic Priority Area 1 Genomics and biotechnologies for health Chart: proportion of financial contribution going to new instruments EU contribution proposed 17% 21% 62% IP NoE Other Key figures on new instruments IP NoE retained 42 15 Above threshold not retained 20 11 Oversubscription rate 4.9 4.2 Financial Oversubscription rate 6.8 8.1 Averages Value of project (M Euro) 18.2 16.4 No of participants 22 39 Industrial participation SME participation 11 % 6 % New Member States and Accession Country participation 4 % 6 % 33
Page 1 and 2: Report Evaluation of the effectiven
Page 3 and 4: 1. Executive Summary An independent
Page 5 and 6: 2. Introduction The European Resear
Page 7 and 8: The members of the Panel 1. Ramon M
Page 9 and 10: The New instruments in the first ca
Page 11 and 12: • The mismatch between the expect
Page 13 and 14: Integrated Projects and STREPs are
Page 15 and 16: 3.4. Ensuring participation of all
Page 17 and 18: Dissatisfaction with the feedback o
Page 19 and 20: Another novelty introduced in FP 6
Page 21 and 22: 4.1. Portfolio of Instruments Recom
Page 23 and 24: Integrated Projects Integrated Proj
Page 25 and 26: Recommendation 9 For FP7 a much mor
Page 27 and 28: First step • Proposals are short
Page 29 and 30: The existing Financial Regulation s
Page 31: 1. Overall situation of FP6 (first
Page 35 and 36: Thematic Priority Area 3 Nanotechno
Page 37 and 38: Thematic Priority Area 4.2 Space Ch
Page 39 and 40: Thematic Priority Area 6.1 Sustaina
Page 41 and 42: Thematic Priority Area 6.3 Global c
Page 43 and 44: 3. Comparison between priorities Sh
Page 45 and 46: Participants from Candidate Countri
Page 47 and 48: Annex 2 Survey among Project Partic
Page 49 and 50: Introduction This report analyses t
Page 51 and 52: Table 1.2: Type of applicant by the
Page 53 and 54: Chart 1.6 : Type of organisation (n
Page 55 and 56: Priorities where the group of respo
Page 57 and 58: Respondents, due to their profile,
Page 59 and 60: the proposal, which is generally co
Page 61 and 62: These results confirm that projects
Page 63 and 64: Chart 3.9: Expectation for the futu
Page 65 and 66: Following elements notably are crit
Page 67 and 68: 6. Comparison with FP5 and traditio
Page 69 and 70: Annex 3 High level Panel of experts
Page 71 and 72: • Frustration at the concept of h
Page 73: Annex 4 - Estimate of average contr

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the New Instruments of ... - CORDIS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?