Evaluation of the effectiveness of the New Instruments of ... - CORDIS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Thematic Priority Area 4.1 Aeronautics Chart: proportion of financial contribution going to new instruments EU contribution proposed 45% 52% IP NoE Other 3% Key figures on new instruments IP NoE Retained 5 1 Above threshold not retained 0 0 Oversubscription rate 2 5 Financial oversubscription rate 2 7 Averages Value project (M Euro) 48 7.5 No of participants 43 14 Industrial participation 62 % 36 % SME participation 18 % 7 % New Member States and Accession Country participation 2 % 7 % 36
Thematic Priority Area 4.2 Space Chart: proportion of financial contribution going to new instruments EU contribution proposed 11% 15% IP NoE Other 74% Key figures on new instruments IP NoE Retained 3 1 Above threshold not retained 0 0 Oversubscription rate 3 2 Financial oversubscription rate 3 3 Averages Value project (M Euro) 21 10 No of participants 45 52 Industrial participation 25 % 27 % SME participation 20 % 25 % New Member States and Accession Country participation 5 % 9 % 37
Page 1 and 2: Report Evaluation of the effectiven
Page 3 and 4: 1. Executive Summary An independent
Page 5 and 6: 2. Introduction The European Resear
Page 7 and 8: The members of the Panel 1. Ramon M
Page 9 and 10: The New instruments in the first ca
Page 11 and 12: • The mismatch between the expect
Page 13 and 14: Integrated Projects and STREPs are
Page 15 and 16: 3.4. Ensuring participation of all
Page 17 and 18: Dissatisfaction with the feedback o
Page 19 and 20: Another novelty introduced in FP 6
Page 21 and 22: 4.1. Portfolio of Instruments Recom
Page 23 and 24: Integrated Projects Integrated Proj
Page 25 and 26: Recommendation 9 For FP7 a much mor
Page 27 and 28: First step • Proposals are short
Page 29 and 30: The existing Financial Regulation s
Page 31 and 32: 1. Overall situation of FP6 (first
Page 33 and 34: 2. Situation of new instruments in
Page 35: Thematic Priority Area 3 Nanotechno
Page 39 and 40: Thematic Priority Area 6.1 Sustaina
Page 41 and 42: Thematic Priority Area 6.3 Global c
Page 43 and 44: 3. Comparison between priorities Sh
Page 45 and 46: Participants from Candidate Countri
Page 47 and 48: Annex 2 Survey among Project Partic
Page 49 and 50: Introduction This report analyses t
Page 51 and 52: Table 1.2: Type of applicant by the
Page 53 and 54: Chart 1.6 : Type of organisation (n
Page 55 and 56: Priorities where the group of respo
Page 57 and 58: Respondents, due to their profile,
Page 59 and 60: the proposal, which is generally co
Page 61 and 62: These results confirm that projects
Page 63 and 64: Chart 3.9: Expectation for the futu
Page 65 and 66: Following elements notably are crit
Page 67 and 68: 6. Comparison with FP5 and traditio
Page 69 and 70: Annex 3 High level Panel of experts
Page 71 and 72: • Frustration at the concept of h
Page 73: Annex 4 - Estimate of average contr

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the New Instruments of ... - CORDIS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?