14.06.2015 Views

Download - School of Management, KIIT University

Download - School of Management, KIIT University

Download - School of Management, KIIT University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Parikalpana - <strong>KIIT</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>Management</strong>, Vol-9(II), 2013<br />

An alternative Stakeholder <strong>Management</strong> Tool<br />

Conflict-Consensus-Collaboration<br />

1<br />

Srikant Kumar Bhadra<br />

Asst. Manager (CSR and R&R)<br />

Aditya Aluminium (Hindalco)<br />

srikant.bhadra@adityabirla.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

This paper is based upon the concept <strong>of</strong> stakeholder theory and integrated corporate<br />

social responsibility. The paper has tried to present how interest <strong>of</strong> stakeholder has<br />

been integrated in to the business interest through CSR. Community and community<br />

groups have been taken as the main stakeholder in the process <strong>of</strong> formulating and<br />

implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, which we usually mean in the context<br />

<strong>of</strong> a social and philanthropic responsibility <strong>of</strong> a company. The crux <strong>of</strong> the paper is to<br />

present two cases where in one case presents corporate social responsibility in<br />

operational risk management approach and other one presents the CSR in a value<br />

creation approach. Both the approaches in this paper has been presented as an<br />

integration approach, one is integrated with business objective to manage the risk,<br />

mostly in reactive way, where as the other one is integrated with core business value<br />

chain and purpose in proactive way. Both approaches are equally necessary and if<br />

can be combined in an integrated development approach becomes effective and<br />

sustainable.<br />

Introduction<br />

The relationship between business<br />

and the society has been studied since<br />

decades with outcomes being influenced<br />

by the prevailing economic paradigm at a<br />

specific point in time. The idea that<br />

business has duties towards society and<br />

more specifically towards its identified<br />

constituent (or stakeholder) is widely<br />

acknowledged. Adam Smith’s 1976 opus,<br />

The wealth <strong>of</strong> Nation is considered as<br />

the landmark <strong>of</strong> modern capitalism (smith,<br />

1991). Smith’s proposition states that when<br />

business is free to pursue pr<strong>of</strong>its and<br />

efficiency, it eventually benefits the<br />

common good, that is, it serves both its<br />

interest and those <strong>of</strong> society at best<br />

(Lantos,2001). Milton Friedman’s neo<br />

classical theory advocates on Smithian<br />

argument by explaining that pr<strong>of</strong>itability is<br />

the ultimate social responsibility <strong>of</strong> the<br />

business if done in an ethical way and in<br />

lawful manner. The classical view on CSR<br />

is mostly based on the neoclassical<br />

economic theory using notion such as the<br />

free market, economic efficiency and pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

maximization, emphasizing on pure pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

making view and wealth creation for<br />

company and shareholders. This theory

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!