Download the PDF - No Greater Joy Ministries

Sodomite Agenda
Sodomites are seeking to redefine marriage in the courts and statutes to include
same-sex unions. If their concern were just to obtain the same legal benefits enjoyed
by traditional marriages, they would be satisfied with “domestic partnership” or “civil
unions”. But no, they want much more. They want to legislate the beliefs, attitudes,
and values of people―everywhere! It is not just legal standing they seek; it is complete
social and moral approval of their chosen, self-felt immoral degradation.
Marriage, necessarily requiring a man and a woman, has by nature been an institution
of exclusion from other “pairings” of people for sexual gratification. It has
earned respect and honor as a sanctified and worthy institution, the place where future
generations are incubated and nurtured. On the other hand, sodomy, by its nature, has
historically been understood by all cultures to be an aberration, a perversion, unworthy
of praise. Queers are tired of being queer. They want to escape the stigma their sin carries
by joining the ranks of the holy—holy matrimony.
Proponents of same-sex “marriage” regard it as a human right to be able to enter
into “marriage” regardless of sexual orientation. I agree that Sodomites have a human
right to do the wrong thing, to do harm to themselves, to be ignorant or stupid, but
there is no human right to constrain others to approve or legally validate that choice.
Just because one is free to choose does not render all choices appropriate. But it is not
really the right to choose they seek; it is the denial of our right to choose otherwise that
is at the forefront of their campaign.
Maggie Gallagher of the National Review says same-sex “marriage” advocates
seek to use the law to “stigmatize, marginalize, and repress those who disagree with
the government’s new views on marriage and sexual orientation.” Sodomites want you
punished for making them feel ashamed or guilty. They will not rest until it is illegal
to quote the Bible regarding the sin of sodomy. You can be certain that, within the next
few years, homosexuals will be a protected species and heterosexuals the endangered
species. They will use the courts to purge society of the last vestige of negative speech
or discriminatory actions. There is no stopping it, short of a nationwide repentance of
true saints for their faithlessness in praying for those in authority over them, “that we
may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty” (1 Tim. 2:1-4). And,
God willing, that revival may be the spark that God will use to ignite another revival
of the godless among us to repentance for their hell-worthy sins.
Dishonest argument
Defenders of traditional marriage have already lost the battle out of timidity.
They argue that marriage is for procreation, something same-sex partners cannot do.
What about sterile couples? Should they be denied the right to marry? Defenders of
traditional marriage argue that “heterosexual couples provide the procreative foundation
that is the chief building block of civilization, and that children are best raised
with a mother and a father.” No doubt true, but what of all the single parents? Others
argue that same-sex marriage is contrary to traditional marriage. So what? does that
make it wrong? Others put forth religious objections, to which the other side quickly
reminds us that religion is often on the wrong side. Defenders of heterosexual marriage
argue that “the definition proposed by same-sex marriage advocates changes the
social importance of marriage from its natural function of reproduction into a mere legality
or freedom to have sex.” That might have been a good argument for the Puritans
three hundred years ago, but it is embarrassing now.
What I am attempting to convey to you is this: It is ultimately futile to reject samesex
“marriage” on such flimsy grounds as those listed above. Most of you by now
should know that such arguments are our last stand after having abandoned our real
belief—Sodomy is hurtful sin. Anything else would be like the arguments used against
premarital sex that point to “how unfulfilling it is to get involved too early.” Good luck
with that argument.
You can voice all kinds of arguments about the social implications and what is best
for the rearing of children, but that is nothing more than a smoke screen for a faith-
12 www.nogreaterjoy.org | 1-866-292-9936