20.06.2015 Views

Download the PDF - No Greater Joy Ministries

Download the PDF - No Greater Joy Ministries

Download the PDF - No Greater Joy Ministries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Holy Matrimony<br />

by Michael Pearl<br />

Most of my readers will agree that holy matrimony<br />

is not <strong>the</strong> product of <strong>the</strong> state, but few understand that<br />

it is likewise not <strong>the</strong> product of <strong>the</strong> church.<br />

Origin of marriage<br />

The marriage of one man to one woman is <strong>the</strong> oldest institution on earth, predating<br />

all religion and government, inaugurated in <strong>the</strong> Garden of Eden by <strong>the</strong> Creator<br />

himself. The incarnate son of <strong>the</strong> Creator, Jesus, said, “Have ye not read, that he which<br />

made <strong>the</strong>m at <strong>the</strong> beginning made <strong>the</strong>m male and female, and said, For this cause<br />

shall a man leave fa<strong>the</strong>r and mo<strong>the</strong>r, and shall cleave to his wife: and <strong>the</strong>y twain [two<br />

and no more] shall be one flesh? Wherefore <strong>the</strong>y are no more twain, but one flesh. What<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore God hath joined toge<strong>the</strong>r, let not man put asunder” (Mat<strong>the</strong>w 19:4-6).<br />

The traditional view of marriage that has come down to us from antiquity is<br />

shared by peoples of every culture and language, and reflects quite well <strong>the</strong> Biblical<br />

definition of marriage as being only between a man and a woman. History, likewise,<br />

reveals that all governments and religions have assumed that marriage is an unalienable<br />

human mandate from God, thus pre-existing government, and that it is <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

beyond its jurisdiction.<br />

Legislators and rulers have seldom attempted to tamper with <strong>the</strong> private nature<br />

of this covenant between a man and a woman. Where legislation has been passed in<br />

regard to marriage, it has, with rare exception, been to protect <strong>the</strong> sanctity and independence<br />

of this fundamental human right. In fact, previous to <strong>the</strong> last fifty years or so,<br />

<strong>the</strong> march of history had tended toward increasing respect for <strong>the</strong> distinctive autonomy<br />

and sanctity of holy matrimony. As <strong>the</strong> collective states became more enlightened,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y increasingly legislated against polygamy, incest, abandonment of children, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> patriarchal abuse of <strong>the</strong> female in marriage.<br />

The United States has demonstrated in its tax codes a vested interest in protecting<br />

<strong>the</strong> autonomous freedom of marriage. But an “invested interest” separated from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Biblical and traditional concept of a lifetime covenant between one man and one<br />

woman provides no protection at all to marriage as God has ordained it. And so it is<br />

that until recently, <strong>the</strong> states have not attempted to offer a definition of marriage different<br />

from <strong>the</strong> traditional assumptions and practices.<br />

Role of <strong>the</strong> State<br />

Let’s be very clear: <strong>the</strong> established record of history has consistently indicated<br />

that <strong>the</strong> state does not create <strong>the</strong> right of marriage. As a part of its function, it acknowledges<br />

and protects certain rights, duties, and privileges of both <strong>the</strong> husband and <strong>the</strong><br />

wife, as have been well defined by <strong>the</strong> common practice of o<strong>the</strong>rwise diverse cultures<br />

and religions. Historically, governments have guarded <strong>the</strong> sanctity of marriage more<br />

consistently than <strong>the</strong>y have o<strong>the</strong>r unalienable rights, such as liberty, property, and<br />

freedom of association.<br />

Where <strong>the</strong> state has failed to protect <strong>the</strong> inherent nature of holy matrimony, by allowing<br />

polygamy or preventing mixed race marriages, it was understood by all, and eventually<br />

was so demonstrated, to be <strong>the</strong> result of corruption and injustice in that state.<br />

The state, being secondary to <strong>the</strong> institution of marriage, has no jurisdiction to<br />

redefine <strong>the</strong> nature of marriage, as in so-called same-sex “marriage.” Even in ancient<br />

Greece, where homosexual activity was common, same sex relationships were understood<br />

to be <strong>the</strong> aberration—equal to adultery—while heterosexual marriage was<br />

understood to be <strong>the</strong> norm.<br />

www.nogreaterjoy.org | 1-866-292-9936

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!