Download the PDF - No Greater Joy Ministries
Download the PDF - No Greater Joy Ministries
Download the PDF - No Greater Joy Ministries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Holy Matrimony<br />
by Michael Pearl<br />
Most of my readers will agree that holy matrimony<br />
is not <strong>the</strong> product of <strong>the</strong> state, but few understand that<br />
it is likewise not <strong>the</strong> product of <strong>the</strong> church.<br />
Origin of marriage<br />
The marriage of one man to one woman is <strong>the</strong> oldest institution on earth, predating<br />
all religion and government, inaugurated in <strong>the</strong> Garden of Eden by <strong>the</strong> Creator<br />
himself. The incarnate son of <strong>the</strong> Creator, Jesus, said, “Have ye not read, that he which<br />
made <strong>the</strong>m at <strong>the</strong> beginning made <strong>the</strong>m male and female, and said, For this cause<br />
shall a man leave fa<strong>the</strong>r and mo<strong>the</strong>r, and shall cleave to his wife: and <strong>the</strong>y twain [two<br />
and no more] shall be one flesh? Wherefore <strong>the</strong>y are no more twain, but one flesh. What<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore God hath joined toge<strong>the</strong>r, let not man put asunder” (Mat<strong>the</strong>w 19:4-6).<br />
The traditional view of marriage that has come down to us from antiquity is<br />
shared by peoples of every culture and language, and reflects quite well <strong>the</strong> Biblical<br />
definition of marriage as being only between a man and a woman. History, likewise,<br />
reveals that all governments and religions have assumed that marriage is an unalienable<br />
human mandate from God, thus pre-existing government, and that it is <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
beyond its jurisdiction.<br />
Legislators and rulers have seldom attempted to tamper with <strong>the</strong> private nature<br />
of this covenant between a man and a woman. Where legislation has been passed in<br />
regard to marriage, it has, with rare exception, been to protect <strong>the</strong> sanctity and independence<br />
of this fundamental human right. In fact, previous to <strong>the</strong> last fifty years or so,<br />
<strong>the</strong> march of history had tended toward increasing respect for <strong>the</strong> distinctive autonomy<br />
and sanctity of holy matrimony. As <strong>the</strong> collective states became more enlightened,<br />
<strong>the</strong>y increasingly legislated against polygamy, incest, abandonment of children, and<br />
<strong>the</strong> patriarchal abuse of <strong>the</strong> female in marriage.<br />
The United States has demonstrated in its tax codes a vested interest in protecting<br />
<strong>the</strong> autonomous freedom of marriage. But an “invested interest” separated from<br />
<strong>the</strong> Biblical and traditional concept of a lifetime covenant between one man and one<br />
woman provides no protection at all to marriage as God has ordained it. And so it is<br />
that until recently, <strong>the</strong> states have not attempted to offer a definition of marriage different<br />
from <strong>the</strong> traditional assumptions and practices.<br />
Role of <strong>the</strong> State<br />
Let’s be very clear: <strong>the</strong> established record of history has consistently indicated<br />
that <strong>the</strong> state does not create <strong>the</strong> right of marriage. As a part of its function, it acknowledges<br />
and protects certain rights, duties, and privileges of both <strong>the</strong> husband and <strong>the</strong><br />
wife, as have been well defined by <strong>the</strong> common practice of o<strong>the</strong>rwise diverse cultures<br />
and religions. Historically, governments have guarded <strong>the</strong> sanctity of marriage more<br />
consistently than <strong>the</strong>y have o<strong>the</strong>r unalienable rights, such as liberty, property, and<br />
freedom of association.<br />
Where <strong>the</strong> state has failed to protect <strong>the</strong> inherent nature of holy matrimony, by allowing<br />
polygamy or preventing mixed race marriages, it was understood by all, and eventually<br />
was so demonstrated, to be <strong>the</strong> result of corruption and injustice in that state.<br />
The state, being secondary to <strong>the</strong> institution of marriage, has no jurisdiction to<br />
redefine <strong>the</strong> nature of marriage, as in so-called same-sex “marriage.” Even in ancient<br />
Greece, where homosexual activity was common, same sex relationships were understood<br />
to be <strong>the</strong> aberration—equal to adultery—while heterosexual marriage was<br />
understood to be <strong>the</strong> norm.<br />
www.nogreaterjoy.org | 1-866-292-9936