FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
FATE OF MERCURY IN THE ARCTIC Michael Evan ... - COGCI
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
<strong>FATE</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>MERCURY</strong> <strong>IN</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>ARCTIC</strong><br />
<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Evan</strong> Goodsite<br />
Ph.D. Thesis<br />
Submitted to the Department of Chemistry at<br />
the University of Copenhagen, June 2003
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 2<br />
ISBN XX-XXXX-XXX-X
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 3<br />
Dansk sammenfatning<br />
I denne Ph.D. er kviksølvs skæbne i Arktis undersøgt gennem feltmålinger og teoretiske<br />
beregninger. Ph.D.`en er udført på <strong>COGCI</strong> Ph.D. skole, Kemisk Institut, Københavns Universitet i<br />
samarbejde med Danmarks Miljøundersøgelser, DMU, Afdeling for Atmosfærisk Miljø, ATMI,<br />
med finansieringsmidler fra Forskningsstyrelsen og DMU.<br />
I arbejdet er der målt kviksølv og kviksølvfluxe over snedækket samt i troposfæren over Arktis.<br />
Der er desuden målt kviksølv i tørveprofiler fra diverse arktiske områder.<br />
I atmosfæren over Arktis sker der efter den polare solopgang en oxidation af gasformig<br />
elementært kviksølv, Hg 0 , til divalent gasformig kviksølv, såkaldt RGM, hvilket let deponeres. Ved<br />
hjælp af en ”relaxed eddy accumulation” flux-maskine udviklet i dette Ph.D. projekt, er målinger af<br />
denne deponering for første gang rapporteret. Flux-maskinen er specielt designet til måling af RGM<br />
under arktiske betingelser. Baseret på disse fluxmålinger samt andre rapporterede felt- og<br />
laboratoriemålinger er en teoretisk kemisk mekanisme for oxidation af Hg 0 til RGM i troposfæren<br />
efter polar solopgang rapporteret.<br />
Med det formål at etablere en tidsserie er der målt kviksølv i tørveprofiler fra arktiske områder.<br />
Udviklingen af en ny dateringsmetode under denne Ph.D. muliggjorde dette med en meget høj tids-<br />
opløsning inden for de sidste 50 år. Der er desuden udviklet en metode til analyse af kviksølv i tørv<br />
samt et boresystem til anvendelse ved frossen tørv.<br />
Undersøgelserne bekræfter, at kviksølvforekomsten er steget i Arktis siden starten af<br />
industrialiseringen, og at der har været en faldende tendens de seneste 10 år. Modelberegninger<br />
foretaget på baggrund af data fra dette Ph.D. projekt tyder på en fordobling af<br />
kviksølvdeponeringen til de arktiske områder, når forårets oxidation af Hg 0 til RGM med<br />
efterfølgende deponering tages i betragtning. Yderligere undersøgelser af dette fænomen samt dets<br />
effekt på det arktiske miljø er derfor nødvendige i fremtiden.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 4<br />
Abstract<br />
Using a micrometeorological system, relaxed eddy accumulation, with a heated sampling<br />
system specifically designed for Arctic use, the dry deposition of reactive gaseous mercury (RGM)<br />
is quantified after polar sunrise, in Barrow, Alaska. KCl coated manually analysed annular denuders<br />
were used as the accumulators. At 3 m above the snow pack significant RGM fluxes measured<br />
during March 29 th – April 12 th 2000 were directed toward the snow surface. Overall mean flux was<br />
found to be - 0.4 ± 0.2 pg m -2 s -1 ; N=9, ± SE, where the negative sign convention denotes<br />
deposition. Using measured total RGM concentrations; depositional velocities were then calculated<br />
and found on average to be 1 cm s -1 .<br />
Examining the experimental data from this field campaign. as well as current published field<br />
data and reaction kinetics data, a plausible mechanism for the oxidation of gaseous Hg (0) to the<br />
divalent gaseous form is proposed. The mechanism is consistent with the kinetics, thermodynamics<br />
and field observations, but the final end products are still not known, due to the measurement<br />
method in the field, i.e., reactive gaseous mercury is operationally determined and defined. The<br />
hypothesized mechanism is not the same as the mechanisms otherwise derived, where the depletion<br />
of atmospheric boundary-layer mercury is said to be due to a reaction between gaseous elemental<br />
mercury, GEM, and BrO free radicals or mechanisms resulting in the formulation of HgCl2.<br />
The proposed reaction mechanism is that gaseous elemental mercury, Hg (0) combines with Br<br />
atoms, called X, coming from the polar sunrise destruction of ozone, in a reversible reaction,<br />
forming the energised HgBr*. Through a third body reaction, M, where M is N2 or O2, the HgBr<br />
radical is formed. The HgBr radical can live long enough at the low temperatures of the Arctic to<br />
combine with O2 forming the HgBrOO peroxy radical or can combine with Br forming HgBr2. It is<br />
not likely to react with Cl, since this reaction would be endothermic. Similarly, the product cannot<br />
be Hg2Br2 since this would imply a tri molecular reaction, which is highly unlikely to occur in the
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 5<br />
atmosphere given the very low concentrations of elemental mercury, bromine atoms, and HgBr. Nor<br />
would the product be HgO, since this formation is similarly thermodynamically not favourable. The<br />
final product is the divalent gaseous mercury family of unknowns, HgXY, proposed here to be<br />
HgBr2. By modelling the reaction of Hg and Br in the atmosphere, with current reaction constant<br />
data, and BrO and Br measured concentrations, we find, assuming 20 ppt BrO and 2 ppt Br in the<br />
atmosphere during a depletion event, that the lifetime of Hg is 4.6 hrs against forming HgBr, The<br />
lifetime of HgBr is 0.35 hrs. against forming HgBr2; comparing with the lifetime of HgBr of 0.75<br />
hrs means that 68% of the time HgBr will form HgBr2. Thus the overall lifetime of removal of Hg<br />
to HgBr2 is 4.6 hrs. / .68 = 6.7 hrs. This is in good agreement with the observed 10 hr lifetime of Hg<br />
under depletion.<br />
Mercury concentrations were investigated in peat to determine background levels of mercury in<br />
the Arctic area. Since the types of wetlands found in the Arctic region are not raised, ombrotrophic,<br />
rainwater nourished, bogs but rather minerotrophic, groundwater nourished, fens, comparison was<br />
made with a raised bog from Denmark. To ensure that post depositional processes are comparable,<br />
especially in the oxidation/reduction transition zone near the surface, a high-time resolution direct<br />
dating technique, based on accelerator mass spectrometry, AMS, measurements of 14 C levels in the<br />
profile were made, and correlated to the elevated atmospheric 14 C levels from past nuclear bomb<br />
testing.<br />
In southern Greenland, and the Faroe Islands, the chronology of Hg accumulation is similar to<br />
that of the bog in Denmark, suggesting that in remote areas, Hg is supplied to the wetlands<br />
primarily via atmospheric deposition, demonstrating that given the proper conditions, minerotrophic<br />
sediments provide a history of atmospheric deposition as consistent as one provided by a raised bog.<br />
Hg fluxes in the Greenland core (0.3 to 0.5 µg m -2 yr -1 ) were found in peats dating from AD<br />
550 to AD 975, compared to the maximum of 164 µg m -2 yr -1 in 1953. Atmospheric Hg
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 6<br />
accumulation rates have since declined with the value for 1995, 14 µg m -2 yr -1 comparable to those<br />
values published in 1995 from the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (Christensen et al., 2002,<br />
Skov et al., 2003, Appendix C), of 12 µg m -2 yr -1 for southern Greenland.<br />
In Denmark, the greatest rate of atmospheric Hg accumulation is found in 1953, 184 µg m -2 yr -<br />
1 , comparable to that of Greenland with the flux going into sharp decline, with an accumulation rate<br />
for 1994 as 14 µg m -2 yr -1 . This compares well with the modelled rate of 18 µg m -2 yr -1 for all of<br />
Denmark. On the Faroe Islands, the maximum mercury concentration was 498 ng g -1 . Dated to be<br />
in 1954 +/-2, with a 210 Pb constant rate of supply dating model, in good agreement with historical<br />
maximums in 1953 in S. Greenland and Denmark. Depositional maximum was in 1985, 34.3 µg m -2<br />
yr -1 , with the 1995 value of 18 µg m -2 yr -1 , comparing with Denmark and the modelled value of<br />
approximately 10 µg m -2 yr -1 . The present day value of approximately 10 µg m -2 yr -1 compares well<br />
with recently reported measurements of 7 µg m -2 yr -1 (Daugaard, 2003). Long-term accumulation<br />
rate of mercury in this core was 0.95 ± 0.36 µg m -2 yr -1 for the period of 4200 B.C. to AD 833; n =<br />
61, in agreement with the Danish and South Greenland peat cores, peat cores from Switzerland and<br />
what is known about the global mercury cycle, and what would be expected in a remote area. The<br />
Hg concentrations in the Faroe Islands are higher than those found in cores from other sites, but the<br />
net Hg accumulation rates are comparable.<br />
The depositional records in the peat are in good agreement with what would be predicted:<br />
lower depositional rates at sites further North from European industries; and in agreement with<br />
previous atmospheric measurements that showed that total gaseous mercury in Europe reached an<br />
average annual maximum in the late 1980’s and have been falling since 1990 decreasing globally<br />
by 22% from 1990 - 1994 (Slemr et al., 1995 and references therein). The results are discussed<br />
with respect to the available literature and their potential implication for our understanding of the<br />
global mercury cycle.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 7<br />
Preface and Acknowledgements<br />
This thesis was submitted to the Department of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen in<br />
partial fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the Ph.D. degree through the Copenhagen<br />
Global Change Initiative, <strong>COGCI</strong>, Ph.D. school.<br />
The subject of this thesis is the experimental investigation of the fate of mercury in the Arctic<br />
by determination of mercury flux and background concentrations through studies in peat, and<br />
determination of Hg conversion and subsequent deposition of reactive gaseous mercury, RGM, to<br />
the snow pack.<br />
The work for this thesis was performed during the period May 2000 through May 2003 with<br />
Professor Ole John Nielsen from the University of Copenhagen and Dr. Henrik Skov from NERI<br />
Denmark as supervisors. I performed my work at NERI, and spent 6 months at Oak Ridge National<br />
Laboratory, under the supervision of Dr. Steven Lindberg; with concurrent stay at the NOAA,<br />
ATDD, Oak Ridge, under the supervision of Dr.’s Steve Brooks and Tilden Meyers. Work on peat<br />
cores was performed under the supervision of Professor William Shotyk, University of Heidelberg.<br />
My Ph.D. work has been supported by the Danish Research Academy, NERI Denmark, and the<br />
University of Southern Denmark, Department of Chemistry. Research funding for fieldwork was<br />
primarily through DANCEA.<br />
Most of the results presented herein have been published elsewhere, or are in the process of<br />
being published. Papers and Manuscripts are inserted as supplementary material in Appendix C.<br />
There are a number of people whom I wish to acknowledge. In particular my family and<br />
extended family, who have allowed me to be absent for over one year, during field and research<br />
work, my academic supervisors and research collaborators and the Department of Chemistry at the
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 8<br />
University of Southern Denmark, who have supported my well being and development by hiring me<br />
and allowing me to finish my Ph.D. dissertation over the last year.<br />
Dedicated to the people of the North, who have welcomed me and supported my research. I<br />
hope that my work will in a small way contribute to efforts to keep your homelands pristine and<br />
your traditions preserved. Quanaaq!
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 9<br />
Table of Contents<br />
1. Introduction 10<br />
1.1 The aim of this work 12<br />
1.2 Summary of results 13<br />
1.3 Sampling and Arctic fieldwork 17<br />
2. Overview 18<br />
2.1 General Mercury 18<br />
2.2 Arctic Mercury 19<br />
2.3 Mercury recorded in environmental archives 20<br />
2.4 Overview of Arctic atmospheric chemistry “The polar sunrise mercury<br />
depletion event” 22<br />
3. Experimental Methods, Equipment and Procedures 27<br />
3.2 Measurement of atmospheric elemental mercury and ozone 30<br />
3.3 Ozone measurements 30<br />
3.4 Gaseous elemental mercury measurements 30<br />
3.5 RGM determination 33<br />
3.6 Flux measurements of reactive gaseous mercury by relaxed eddy<br />
accumulation 39<br />
3.7 Peat analysis 57<br />
3.8 Age dating of peat profiles 61<br />
4. Results and Discussion 63<br />
4.1 Ozone and GEM Measurements 69<br />
4.2 RGM concentrations and Flux 71<br />
4.3 High resolution dating of peat archives and mercury in peat 77<br />
5. Conclusion and future work 117<br />
Glossary, acronyms and abbreviations 119<br />
Bibliography 121<br />
Appendix A List of Papers 128<br />
Appendix B Field Work: planning and post expedition report format132<br />
Appendix C Supplementary material 142
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 10<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Elemental mercury is unique when compared to other trace metals found in the atmosphere, in<br />
that it is approximately 95% in the gaseous elemental form (Slemr et al., 1985, Schroeder and<br />
Munthe 1998), where other metals such as lead, are primarily associated in the atmosphere as<br />
aerosols. Its characteristics, such as low aqueous solubility, mean that it is relatively non reactive<br />
and stable and therefore has a long atmospheric residence time, enabling global transport. Its vapour<br />
pressure allows it to be deposited and re-emitted, as does bacteriologic conversion and subsequent<br />
emission. All of these factors contribute to its spread throughout the globe to areas where there are<br />
no natural or man-made inputs, such as the Arctic.<br />
In 1998 Schroeder et al., reported on their 1995 discovery of the springtime depletion of<br />
tropospheric gaseous mercury in the high Canadian Arctic. This perennial phenomenon is since<br />
dubbed atmospheric mercury depletion episodes, AMDEs (Schroeder et al., 2003), and has since<br />
been shown to be a polar and sub-polar phenomenon. Apart from Alert, AMDEs have been reported<br />
at other Arctic locations (Lindberg et al., 2001, Berg et al., 2001, 2003, Skov et al., 2001, Steffen et<br />
al., 2002) as well as in the Antarctic (Ebinghaus et al., 2002) and sub-arctic (Poissant and Pilote,<br />
2001). The phenomenon attracted attention and concern in Denmark, since Greenland and the Faroe<br />
Islands are part of the Danish Kingdom and toxic exposure to mercury from eating a traditional<br />
marine diet may result. All forms of mercury such as elemental, inorganic and organic, are toxic.<br />
However once in the ecosystem, elemental mercury is subject to methylation, increased uptake and<br />
toxicity.<br />
Methylmercury compounds are bioaccumulated and can present a health hazard to people<br />
eating from affected food sources.<br />
Background levels of mercury in the Arctic regions are not well known, since environmental<br />
archives typically studied are ice cores, and ice is incredibly difficult and slow to obtain reliable Hg
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 11<br />
analyses from. In the Arctic, these cores are taken from areas where AMDEs do not occur, typically<br />
at altitudes greater than 2 km above sea level on the inland ice. AMDEs are coastal phenomenon, so<br />
it was necessary to find a suitable environmental archive to investigate background and recent<br />
levels of mercury in the Arctic. For this work, peat was chosen, since there are many unanswered<br />
issues regarding Hg diagenesis in aquatic environments and sedimentation rates in Arctic limnic<br />
systems are very slow.<br />
In general, the state of Hg research is relatively immature, compared with other trace metals,<br />
especially lead. The global and Arctic Hg cycle is poorly understood, and source receptor<br />
relationships need to be well formulated in order to apply the science to real world problems. The<br />
most actual present day large-scale mercury problem is faced in the Arctic, i.e., where ecosystems<br />
and local communities are fragile due to high exposure. Mercury’s toxicity has already had<br />
measurable effects in the Faroe Islands (Grandjean et al., 1992, 1995, 1997; Sørensen et al., 1999;<br />
Steuerwald et al., 2000). In 1986 in north Greenland more than 80% of the population exceeded the<br />
benchmark level of concern for the United States, 50 µg Hg l -1 blood and 16% exceeded the World<br />
Health Organization, WHO, minimum toxic blood concentration in non-pregnant adults, 200 µg Hg<br />
l -1 blood (Hansen and Pedersen, 1986). Weihe et al., 2002 suggest, but do not conclude, that<br />
observed neurobehavioral deficits in Inuit children from Qaanaqq, NW Greenland might be related<br />
to dietary mercury exposure.<br />
Therefore, the National Environmental Research Institute in co-ordination with the University<br />
of Copenhagen Global Change Initiative, <strong>COGCI</strong>, initiated Arctic mercury monitoring and research<br />
programmes, commencing shortly after the Canadian discovery. This Ph.D. is a part of these<br />
national efforts, and is focused on the atmospheric chemistry of mercury, its gaseous deposition and<br />
subsequent and historical accumulation in the Arctic.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 12<br />
1.1 The aim of this work<br />
The purpose of this work is to better understand the temporal, and spatial patterns of mercury<br />
deposition and accumulation in the Arctic, gaining an understanding of the chemical and<br />
depositional processes so that they might be applied to models of atmospheric transport and<br />
deposition and eventually policy decisions. To meet this aim, specific scientific questions were<br />
addressed. These specified questions contained implied questions or tasks that must be answered or<br />
addressed in order to investigate the specification.<br />
The specified and implied questions addressed in this Ph.D. work are as follows:<br />
Specified 1. What is the deposition of reactive gaseous mercury to the Arctic following a<br />
mercury depletion incident, and what is the depositional velocity of RGM?<br />
Implied 1.1. Reactive gaseous mercury, RGM, flux must be measured concurrently with total<br />
concentration of RGM.<br />
Implied 1.2. A method to measure RGM flux for the Arctic must be developed.<br />
Specified 2. What is a plausible reaction mechanism for the oxidation of gaseous elemental<br />
mercury to reactive gaseous mercury?<br />
Implied 2.1. Since the measurement technique applied for RGM concentration measurement,<br />
KCl coated annular denuders, does not allow for the subsequent chemical determination of RGM,<br />
HgXY, post field study analysis must be applied using relative rate theory studies and known<br />
reaction kinetics and thermodynamics.<br />
Specified 3. What are the pre and post-industrial values of Hg in the Arctic?<br />
Implied 3.1. A suitable environmental archive must be chosen; in this case peat.<br />
Implied 3.1.2 Arctic peat must be found and shown to provide a faithful record of atmospheric<br />
mercury deposition.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 13<br />
Implied 3.1.3 A method must be developed to reliably and reproducibly analyse very non-<br />
homogeneous sediment such as peat for Hg content.<br />
Implied 3.3. Arctic peat must be compared with traditionally studied raised bog, peat profiles.<br />
Implied 3.3.1 Arctic peat must be dated with high enough time resolution for comparison with<br />
raised bog profiles. The traditional method of dating highly mineral peat cores such as Arctic peat,<br />
i.e. 210 Pb chronologic modelling is sufficiently accurate for Arctic peat studies alone, but not<br />
accurate enough for dating raised bog profiles. A direct dating method must therefore be developed<br />
to allow comparison in the geochemically important upper layers of the peat profiles at each site.<br />
Implied 3.3.2 Techniques must be developed for safe, effective and efficient sampling of peat in<br />
the Arctic.<br />
1.2 Summary of results<br />
Bearing in mind the specified questions and implied tasks as noted, the main findings of my<br />
Ph.D. work are as follows. Papers referred to are included in Appendix C.<br />
Gaseous mercury is oxidized in the Arctic troposphere at polar sunrise. The resulting divalent<br />
mercury product species, HgXY, suggested as HgBr2 and/or HgBrOH, is deposited to the<br />
snow pack. The evasion of HgXY is also observed.<br />
The micrometeorological technique conditional sampling or “relaxed eddy accumulation”,<br />
REA, was developed for measurement of the flux of the operationally defined inorganic divalent<br />
gaseous mercury compounds HgXY, reactive gaseous mercury, in the Arctic (paper 1, Goodsite et<br />
al., submitted).<br />
The first measurements and quantification of HgXY surface flux and depositional velocity to<br />
the snow pack during polar sunrise was made, and an initial reaction mechanism suggested (paper<br />
2, Lindberg et al., 2002).
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 14<br />
After polar sunrise, in Barrow, Alaska, KCl coated manual RGM denuders were used as the<br />
accumulator with the REA system. At 3 m above the snow pack significant RGM fluxes measured<br />
during March 29 th – April 12 th 2000 were directed toward the snow surface. Overall mean<br />
deposition was found to be - 0.4 +/- 0.2 pg m -2 s -1 ; N=9, +/1 SE and re-evasion was also observed.<br />
Using measured total RGM concentrations; depositional velocities were then computed and found<br />
to be on the order of 1 cm s -1 . Upon closer examination of field data, a relative rate study (paper 3,<br />
Skov et al., submitted) and utilizing knowledge from recently published reaction kinetics (Ariya et<br />
al., 2002), an updated mechanism is suggested (paper 4, Goodsite et al., submitted).<br />
The proposed reaction mechanism is that gaseous elemental mercury, Hg (0) combines with Br<br />
atoms, called X, coming from the polar sunrise destruction of ozone, in a reversible reaction,<br />
forming the energised HgBr*. Through a third body reaction, M, where M is N2 or O2, the HgBr<br />
radical is formed. The HgBr radical can live long enough at the low temperatures of the Arctic to<br />
combine with O2 forming the HgBrOO peroxy radical or can combine with Br forming HgBr2. It is<br />
not likely to react with Cl, since this reaction would be endothermic. Similarly, the product cannot<br />
be Hg2Br2 since this would imply a tri molecular reaction, which is highly unlikely to occur in the<br />
atmosphere given the very low concentrations of the reactants. Nor would the end product be HgO,<br />
since this formation is similarly thermodynamically not favourable. The final product is the divalent<br />
gaseous mercury unknown, HgXY. By modelling the reaction of Hg and Br in the atmosphere, with<br />
current reaction constant data, and BrO and Br measurements, we find that assuming 20 ppt BrO<br />
and 2 ppt in the atmosphere during a depletion event that the lifetime of Hg is 4.6 hrs against<br />
forming HgBr, The lifetime of HgBr is 0.35 hrs. against forming HgBr2; comparing with the<br />
lifetime of HgBr of 0.75 hrs means that 68% of the time HgBr will form HgBr2. Thus the overall<br />
lifetime of removal of Hg to HgBr2 is 4.6 hrs. / .68 = 6.7 hrs. This is in good agreement with the<br />
observed 10 hr lifetime of Hg under depletion.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 15<br />
We learned from our experiences measuring gaseous elemental mercury on the Faroe Islands<br />
that measuring gaseous elemental mercury is not trivial. Care must be taken in choosing appropriate<br />
measurement procedures (paper 5, Skov et al., accepted).<br />
Mercury in environmental archives, peat in the Arctic<br />
Mercury was measured in peat cores from S. Greenland, the Faroe Islands, Denmark, and from<br />
the high Arctic (Bathurst Island and Carey Islands) samples from Bathurst Islands were given to N.<br />
Givelet, University of Berne, and will not be discussed. Samples from Nordvestø, Carey Islands,<br />
Greenland, are still being investigated, so preliminary results only will be treated. Cores from S.<br />
Greenland, Denmark and the Faroe Islands had sufficient new growth to examine the geochemistry<br />
during the last 50 years with high resolution.<br />
To do this, a new, direct, approach to high time resolution dating was developed and applied to<br />
peat from sub-arctic southern Greenland and Denmark. The advantages of direct, high time<br />
resolution dating are thoroughly discussed (paper 6, Goodsite et al., 2002).<br />
An analytical method was developed to best determine the amount of mercury in the peat<br />
(paper 7, Roos-Barraclough et al., 2002).<br />
The first long term terrestrial record of mercury on Greenland (paper 8, Shotyk et al., accepted)<br />
and the Faroe Islands are produced (Shotyk, Goodsite et al., unpublished data, manuscript in<br />
preparation). Hg fluxes in the Greenland core (0.3 to 0.5 µg m -2 yr -1 ) were found in peats dating<br />
from AD 550 to AD 975, compared to the maximum of 164 µg m -2 yr -1 in 1953. Atmospheric Hg<br />
accumulation rates have since declined with the value for 1995, 14 µg m -2 yr -1 comparable to<br />
published depositional rates. Lead and stable lead isotopes were measured in these cores, showing<br />
coal burning was the predominant source of lead. Mercury depositional trends in the cores follow<br />
the lead trends suggesting that the profile is dominated with mercury from coal burning and that the<br />
peat cores are faithfully reproducing depositional trends, in agreement with what is known about
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 16<br />
predominant anthropogenic mercury emissions at the regional and global levels and their<br />
anthropogenic dependence on emissions such as coal burning (Slemr et al., 1992 and references<br />
therein).<br />
In Denmark, the greatest net rate of atmospheric Hg accumulation is found in 1953, 184 µg m -2<br />
yr -1 , comparable to that of Greenland with the flux going into sharp decline, with an accumulation<br />
rate for 1994 as 14 µg m -2 yr -1 .<br />
On the Faroe Islands, the maximum mercury concentration of 498 ng g -1 dw., is seen in the<br />
depth dated to be 1954 +/-2, with a 210 Pb dating model, in good agreement with the historical<br />
maximums in 1953 in S. Greenland and Denmark. Long-term accumulation rate of mercury in this<br />
core was 0.95 +/- 0.36 µg m -2 yr -1 for the period of 4200 B.C. to AD 833; n = 61, in agreement with<br />
what is known about the global mercury cycle, and what would be expected in a remote area. The<br />
Hg concentrations in the Faroe Islands are higher than those found in cores from other sites, but the<br />
net Hg accumulation rates are comparable.<br />
Mercury was also investigated in high arctic peat, requiring development of an improved corer<br />
for sampling (Paper 9, Noernberg et al., submitted).<br />
In addition to the above, in-progress, high Arctic studies, a study of Station Nord, NE<br />
Greenland was carried out for the Royal Danish Air Force. This is an engineering study conceived<br />
and carried out by this author studying a high Arctic station as a point source. It includes trace<br />
metals and mercury data from lake and marine sediments, as well as poly-aromatic hydrocarbon<br />
(PAH) data. It is an internally reviewed NERI report to the Royal Danish Air Force, (Goodsite et<br />
al., 2003, not included in this PhD but available from NERI). The results for mercury in the marine<br />
and lake sediments are in good agreement with other published results, as discussed in the report.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 17<br />
1.3 Sampling and Arctic fieldwork<br />
Much Ph.D. work was spent in the field. Safe and effective planning of fieldwork is discussed.<br />
A logical template meeting the reporting requirements for reporting Environmental Arctic fieldwork<br />
in Greenland, Canada and the US was developed. This template has since been accepted and<br />
utilized by research groups in Germany, Switzerland and Finland. Planning and executing fieldwork<br />
is discussed in Appendix B.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 18<br />
2. Overview<br />
The purpose of this chapter is to give a general background for the rest of this thesis, in order to<br />
understand the approach used to address the scientific questions. The overview should also help<br />
place the results of this work in the context of atmospheric chemistry and importance for the global<br />
mercury cycle and the Kingdom of Denmark, and therefore the Danish Arctic perspective.<br />
2.1 General Mercury<br />
Metallic mercury, Nr. 80 in the periodic system, density 13.5 g/cm 3 has been known since 400<br />
B.C. when a disciple of Aristotle (Theophrastus) described a method of producing what he<br />
described as “liquid silver” by rubbing cinnabar in vinegar. It has since been widely used in<br />
metallurgy and other industrial processes.<br />
As Hg is an element, man can neither create nor destroy it.<br />
Mercury is toxic and the toxicity of mercury vapour and its affects on the central nervous<br />
system has been observed and well known through time, for example, the Romans equivocated<br />
sending someone to work in the mercury mines of Spain as a death sentence. Most have heard of<br />
the “mad hatters”, felt workers who became insane from working with mercury, popularized by<br />
Lewis Carrol (“Alice in Wonderland”).<br />
Mercury use has been found in various cultures as a part of dyes, cosmetics and medicines (e.g.<br />
Ernst and Coon, 2001 or Garvey et al., 2001). Its ancient cultural use can be seen in examples from<br />
the old, new and Asian cultures. For example during the Kofun period (6 th century) Japan, it was<br />
thought that mercury was painted onto the body of a dead person (Yamada et al., 1995).<br />
The world’s largest producer of mercury has been and still is the Almaden area of Spain.<br />
Mercury has always been important to metallurgy. It was mined and sent to the new world for
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 19<br />
extracting primarily silver, as well as gold and may account for 1/3 of anthropogenic emissions<br />
(Hylander and Meili, 2003).<br />
2.2 Arctic Mercury<br />
The Arctic has relatively few sources of mercury. Natural sources include the ocean, volcanoes,<br />
and reemission from snow and soil. Anthropogenic sources are typically point sources such as<br />
towns, settlements, mines and military bases. Most of the mercury arriving to the Arctic is via long-<br />
range atmospheric transport following anthropogenic or natural release in other parts of the world.<br />
The form of the mercury released depends on source type and other factors, such as if the<br />
source has any form for emissions control. Aside from gaseous elemental mercury, which<br />
constitutes the majority of emissions, typically emitted from coal burning power plants or mercury<br />
mines, the remaining emission of mercury are in the form of gaseous inorganic ionic mercury<br />
species typically mercuric chloride, with a much less fraction bound to emitted particles. Due to the<br />
reactivity and size of these forms, they will have a shorter atmospheric lifetime but still contribute<br />
to the global problem through transformation, reemission and subsequent long-range transport.<br />
Mercury is released into the environment from 4 primary sources and emission estimates vary<br />
widely. Most recent estimates (e.g., Lamborg et al., 2002, or Pacyna and Pacyna, 2000) estimate<br />
anthropogenic emissions as approximately 3000 metric tons per year, including 400 tons per year as<br />
reemission from anthropogenic mercury previously deposited to the Oceans, and approximately<br />
1400 metric tons per year from natural emissions. These estimates may be seen as probable lower<br />
limits with upper limits being up to twice as much. Anthropogenic Hg from fossil fuels and waste<br />
amount to more than 1500 t Hg year -1 , but these emissions may now be effectively reduced, i.e.<br />
more than 97% of Hg, by the use of a three stage system for flue gas treatment (Hylander et al.,<br />
2003). This is a new and expensive technology however.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 20<br />
Given the amount of RGM measured in this study, when extrapolated to the Arctic by the<br />
Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model, the amount of mercury deposited to the Arctic doubles to<br />
about 200 tons per year, or approximately 4.5% of the global total emissions as a result of the<br />
springtime arctic mercury depletion episode (Skov et al., 2003, Appendix C).<br />
It is hypothesized that in the Arctic, this mercury is thereafter released at snowmelt into an<br />
ecosystem starving for nourishment. It is therefore subject to immediate uptake into the marine food<br />
web with subsequent methylation and bioaccumulation to follow.<br />
Little is known of the magnitude of the transformation and subsequent re-emission of mercury<br />
as Hg (0). Reactive species, operationally known as reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) identified as<br />
HgXY are typically HgCl2 from power plants, in industrial areas, as well as total particulate<br />
mercury (TPM) will eventually deposit via dry or wet deposition. The true product or products,<br />
HgXY, have not yet been identified in the Arctic region. A summary of what is known with respect<br />
to Arctic atmospheric mercury, as well as identified needs and data gaps are found in Schroeder et<br />
al., 2003.<br />
2.3 Mercury recorded in environmental archives<br />
Post depositional processes for Hg or HgXY include biological or physical fixation, i.e.<br />
adsorption, and subsequent diagenesis, to include chemical oxidation or reduction and subsequent<br />
reemission of at least a portion of the mercury. Gaseous reemission, especially in tropical areas, or<br />
physical reemission through aeolian transport, adsorbed to particles. Reemission of mercury is one<br />
of the ongoing research areas and is very relevant to the global cycle.<br />
Due to a portion of the deposited mercury being reemitted, it must be understood that<br />
environmental archives of mercury represent a net record of accumulation, one that has been subject<br />
to the deposited mercury being subjected to physical and chemical processes that affect the overall<br />
amount of mercury that remains in the archive from year to year. Depending on the archive, and the
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 21<br />
hydrological and geochemical conditions it is exposed to, there may also be post depositional<br />
vertical or horizontal transport.<br />
Working with environmental archives is therefore extremely dynamic and complex, with<br />
several functions that should be taken into consideration: the transfer function from air to plant, soil,<br />
ice, water or snow, the sedimentation function, which describes what happens to the mercury as it<br />
undergoes sedimentation, the fixation function or how the mercury is preserved in the archive, the<br />
diagenesis function which is how the mercury is chemically or physically affected over time and the<br />
reemission function which accounts for losses from the depositional area under consideration. We<br />
have therefore no way of knowing what the actual concentration of atmospheric gaseous elemental<br />
mercury was prior to the industrial age, or through the Holocene and previous geologic history.<br />
However, we can, by studying environmental archives such as lake, marine sediments, peat<br />
sediments and ice cores or historical records (e.g. Hylander and Meili, 2003) relatively determine<br />
that anthropogenic activities have increased levels of mercury in the atmosphere by a factor of 3<br />
(Munthe et al., 2001) or more, as noted in this work.<br />
As also seen from this work, actual spatial loading of mercury over geologic time is very<br />
consistent between different regions, thus indicating the global character of mercury transport and<br />
deposition.<br />
Based on emission inventories from 1995, it is seen that the majority of mercury being released<br />
to the Northern hemisphere and thus most burdening the Arctic is coming from anthropogenic<br />
emissions from coal fired combustion plants in Asia with primary burden in Asia coming from<br />
China (Pacyna and Pacyna, 2000).<br />
The total annual load of mercury transported to the Arctic, is a significant burden to the fragile<br />
and pristine environment. The Arctic weather system and cold as well as the highly productive and<br />
efficient post snow melt marine ecosystem, may represent the ultimate sink for mercury.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 22<br />
Alternatively, processes such as the start of one of the great Oceanic “conveyor belts”, may<br />
mean that much of the mercury brought to the Arctic is transported out again. Many questions<br />
remain about the Arctic mercury cycle. Therefore understanding Arctic mercury depletion events<br />
are important for understanding global mercury cycling. The Arctic may be a much more important<br />
sink or cycling node for global mercury than previously known.<br />
2.4 Overview of Arctic atmospheric chemistry “The polar sunrise mercury<br />
depletion event”<br />
The polar sunrise mercury depletion event, AMDE, or “the mercury sunrise”, is a highly<br />
elevated deposition of mercury which occurs during the first few months following the polar sunrise<br />
and was first reported at Alert, Canada by (Schroeder et al. 1998) having been discovered there by<br />
his team in 1995.<br />
In the Arctic during spring, the lifetime of gaseous elemental mercury is significantly shorter<br />
than 1 year, as mercury in the boundary layer is observed to be depleted in less than one day, during<br />
atmospheric mercury depletion episodes, AMDEs (Schroeder et al. 1998, Lindberg et al. 2002,<br />
Appendix C, Berg et al. 2001, 2003, Skov et al., 2003, Appendix C).<br />
Gaseous elemental mercury is converted to oxidized mercury in the gas phase to the<br />
operationally defined reactive gaseous mercury, RGM, product HgXY. RGM is relatively quickly,<br />
lifetime on the order of approximately 10 hours or less, deposited to the ground, as quantified in this<br />
work.<br />
It should be emphasized that it is not yet actually known what HgXY is in the Arctic.<br />
The mercury depletion happens simultaneously with the start of surface-level ozone depletion.<br />
The springtime destruction of surface ozone in the Arctic is a separate phenomenon from ozone<br />
depletion in the stratosphere, though halogen chemistry activation appears to be just as important<br />
for the tropospheric depletion.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 23<br />
The tropospheric depletion of ozone in the Arctic has been observed to be depleted during<br />
spring since, at least, 1966 (Tarasick and Bottenheim, 2002). It is generally accepted that the<br />
destruction of ozone is caused by catalytic reactions involving halogens, especially bromine, which<br />
originate from the polar oceans (Barrie et al., 1988 and Barrie and Platt, 1997). Our measurements<br />
suggest that the solar activity and present ice crystals influence the atmospheric transformation of<br />
elemental gaseous mercury to divalent mercury, which is more rapidly deposited (Lindberg et al.<br />
2002, paper 2, Appendix C). Satellite observations of BrO (as discussed in paper 2) suggest a<br />
correlation between mercury depletion and the total amount of BrO in the atmosphere, though later<br />
work shows the previously suggested mechanism to be more plausible, with the mechanisms<br />
presented in Lindberg et al., 2002 being thermodynamically unfavourable i.e. it is not likely that<br />
BrO/ClO + Hg 0 → HgO + Br/Cl radicals. Or that Hg 0 + 2Br/Cl radicals → HgBr2 or HgCl2.<br />
The most likely source of the halogens is the sea ice. Mercury depletion events therefore appear<br />
correlated with the presence of sea ice and are therefore probably found wherever there is sea ice<br />
and the potential for open leads. Today, typical levels of gaseous elemental mercury in the remote<br />
Northern hemisphere atmosphere and Arctic are about 1.5 ng m -3 (see paper 2). This level is a little<br />
bit less in the Southern Hemisphere, since most of the anthropogenic sources of gaseous mercury,<br />
are found in the Northern Hemisphere, and there is a lag time in transequatorial mixing.<br />
How long have mercury depletion events been occurring? Tarasick and Bottenheim (2002)<br />
have looked at surface ozone depletion events in the Arctic and Antarctic from historical ozone<br />
sonde records, and have noted ozone depletions since 1966, with an increasing frequency through<br />
2000 “explaining the apparent increase of Hg in Arctic biota in recent times”. They further note that<br />
“If the key to GEM depletion is the presence of reactive bromine, which can only be sustained via<br />
BrO recycling and hence ozone depletion, the increase of mercury in Arctic biota is a direct result<br />
of the increase in occurrence of ozone depletion episodes. “ Work accomplished by the present
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 24<br />
research team indeed does suggest reactive bromine as one step in the mercury depletion<br />
mechanism and shows that Hg deposition has been decreasing. This researcher however, is not<br />
ready to directly correlate the measured increase of Hg in Arctic biota directly to ozone depletion<br />
events. This is a hypothesis that must be tested with future research.<br />
The work done in this Ph.D. on peat in fact suggests that global Hg deposition has peaked, and<br />
that net deposition is in decline. With an appropriate archive, the high resolution dating technique<br />
developed as a part of this work will provide a useful tool for investigating in detail, deposition to<br />
the Arctic coast since 1960. The chance of finding an appropriate high Arctic archive for this time<br />
period are however, slim, due to freeze thaw destruction of the upper layers of soil.<br />
The post snow melt flux into the marine environment is not yet well described, nor is the total<br />
mass balance for mercury cycling in the Arctic, though it is known that once deposited, the RGM is<br />
methylized, primarily by microbial metabolism, to methylmercury, which has the capacity to collect<br />
in organisms i.e., bioaccumulate, and to concentrate up food chains i.e., biomagnify or<br />
bioconcentrate, especially in the marine food chain.<br />
Atmospheric mercury has been of interest since the 60’s with an overview of mercury in the<br />
atmosphere published by Williston in 1968. Slemr et al., 1985, and Lindqvist and Rodhe (1985)<br />
give one of the first comprehensive distribution, speciation and budget of atmospheric mercury.<br />
Since then, two major reviews of the atmospheric chemistry of mercury have been published:<br />
Schroeder and Munthe, 1998; and Lin and Pekhonen, 1999. These studies are cardinal references<br />
with respect to atmospheric mercury. Lin and Pekhonen establish the lifetime of gaseous elemental<br />
mercury to be about 1 year, given what is known of the atmospheric chemistry of mercury at the<br />
time. The work in this Ph.D. suggests that globally, this may need to be re-evaluated, taking into<br />
consideration the extremely short lifetime of Hg (0) during Arctic polar sunrise.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 25<br />
The two reviews suggest that much like other trace constituents in the atmosphere, the<br />
atmospheric chemistry of mercury involves 5 probable families of reaction mechanisms/pathways:<br />
1. Gas phase reactions; 2. Aqueous phase reactions, in cloud and fog droplets and deliquesced<br />
aerosol particles; 3. Partitioning of elemental and oxidised mercury species between the gas and<br />
solid phases; 4. Partitioning between the gas and aqueous phases; 5. Partitioning between the solid<br />
and aqueous phases for insoluble particulate matter scavenged by fog or cloud droplets.<br />
Since the high Arctic is so dry, the predominating reactions must occur in the gas phase and the<br />
predominating deposition in the spring will be dry deposition. Dry depositional removal of gases<br />
from the atmosphere to a surface is one of the main processes by which pollutants are removed<br />
from the atmosphere. Dry deposition refers to the combined effects of three transfers: 1. Transfer<br />
through the turbulent layer of the atmosphere, 2. Molecular transfer through the viscous layer and 3.<br />
Transfer to the surface as a result of contact adsorption, dissolution and other contact phenomena<br />
(Karlsson and Nyholm, 1998). With respect to dry deposition on snow, Valdez et al. (1987) found<br />
that depositional velocity, Vd, most importantly is influenced by the liquid water content of the<br />
snow, i.e. the liquid water-to-air ratio in the snow, and lesser influenced by the density i.e. age of,<br />
and the degree of metamorphism of the snow pack, as well as sun light and temperature. Vd<br />
increases for increased values of snow water content, decreased values of Henry’s law Constant, H,<br />
and increased diffusion coefficient. The corollary is that surface resistance, rs, decreases. Vd<br />
decreases, i.e. rs increases, with decreased snow temperature, or increased time. The increased time<br />
exposure reflect that one expects desorption to occur as atmospheric concentrations are depleted<br />
and the concentrations in the snow come into equilibrium with the atmosphere.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 26<br />
Given the water solubility and reactivity of RGM, the maximum Vd expected would be on the<br />
order of 10 cm s -1 , with minimum Vd of about 0.5 cm s -1 .
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 27<br />
3. Experimental Methods, Equipment and Procedures<br />
The purpose of this section is to describe the methods used to answer the scientific questions<br />
raised. The experiments presented in this work were carried out at different laboratories and field<br />
locations, utilizing and developing methods for air sampling and analysis as well as peat sampling<br />
and analysis. It is appropriate to credit the list of collaborators and visits that have made the<br />
experimental work possible and this list is included as a preface to Appendix C. The limit of<br />
detection, where mentioned refers to that concentration which gives an instrument signal<br />
significantly different from the blank or background signal. There is no full agreement between<br />
statutory bodies or researchers as to what is best to use as the limit of detection. Throughout this<br />
study it is defined in one of the most commonly encountered ways: as the blank signal plus three<br />
standard deviations of the blank. It is important to determine the limit of detection to avoid<br />
reporting the presence of the analyte when it is actually present, or avoid claiming the presence of<br />
an analyte when it is actually absent.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 28<br />
3.1 Study Sites<br />
Barrow 71 0 18’N, 56 0<br />
40’W: RGM flux<br />
Bathurst Island: Peat<br />
Given to N. Givelet, Berne, for<br />
analysis along with peat from<br />
Continental Canada and USA.<br />
Nordvestø, Carey<br />
Islands, Greenland 76 0<br />
44’ N, 73 0 12’ W:<br />
Guanogenic peat,<br />
minerogenic peat.<br />
Preliminary Hg, dates<br />
only Nuuk 64 0 02’ N, 51 0<br />
07’ W: Hg(0), O3.<br />
Ongoing<br />
S. Greenland,<br />
Peat<br />
Figure 1. Sites of field campaigns. Map:CIA public regional reference map.<br />
Station Nord 81 0 36’ N, 16 0 39’<br />
W: Hg(0), O3, RGM; Lake and<br />
Marine Sediments<br />
Faroe Islands:<br />
Peat<br />
Hg(0), O3<br />
Denmark<br />
(Funen):<br />
Peat
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 29<br />
Atmospheric mercury and ozone measurements were made by the NERI team at two sites in<br />
Greenland: Station Nord and Nuuk, and on the Faroe Islands, in Thorshavn; and by the<br />
ORNL/NOAA/US EPA team at Barrow, Alaska.<br />
Manual measurements of reactive gaseous mercury and experiments were performed at Oak<br />
Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, and at Walker Branch Research<br />
Station, US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA, Atmospheric Turbulence<br />
and Diffusion Division, ATDD, Oak Ridge, USA. RGM measurements in the spring, 2001<br />
campaign in Barrow Alaska, were performed by the US team.<br />
The relaxed eddy accumulation system was developed at NERI, with trial and developmental<br />
experiments carried out in Oak Ridge. The system was deployed for the first ever measurements of<br />
RGM flux in the Arctic at the Barrow Arctic Mercury Study site, during the spring of 2001, with<br />
following deployments for developmental purposes only, at Walker Branch in Oak Ridge, as well as<br />
Lille Valby, a NERI experimental site, at an agricultural field north of Roskilde, Denmark. The<br />
improved NOAA relaxed eddy accumulation system was deployed at Lille Valby to compare with<br />
the initial REA system, and for the Spring 2002, Station Nord campaign. The Station Nord<br />
campaign deployed the first NERI system as well, as a back up.<br />
Peat cores were collected from a fen located in southern Greenland, a raised bog in Denmark, a<br />
blanket bog on the Faroe Islands, and two Arctic island locations: on Bathurst Island, Canada and<br />
on Nordvestø, Carey Islands, Greenland, located between the northwest corer of Greenland and<br />
Ellesmere Island, Canada. Samples from Bathurst Island and continental Canada and the USA were<br />
given to another student, Nicolas Givelet, Berne, for primary investigation, and will not be<br />
discussed in this thesis. Samples from Nordvestø are unique in that they are from peat that is<br />
guarnogenic, i.e., nourished by sea bird droppings, as they sit on the island cliffs looking for prey.<br />
They therefore have the potential of providing a primarily biogenic Holocene record of mercury
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 30<br />
accumulation. These samples will be preliminarily discussed since at the time of completion of this<br />
PhD, research is still in progress.<br />
3.2 Measurement of atmospheric elemental mercury and ozone<br />
As seen from measurements in this work, and first reported by Shroeder et. al, 1998, the<br />
destruction of ozone coincides with an atmospheric mercury depletion event. Therefore ozone<br />
monitoring was an integral component of the campaigns investigating atmospheric mercury in the<br />
Arctic, as is the measurement of total gaseous mercury, or gaseous elemental mercury.<br />
The monitor used for atmospheric mercury measurements is the same analyser employed for on<br />
site analysis of manual reactive gaseous mercury measurements, though there is also now, a fully<br />
automated RGM monitor available, which combined with a particulate mercury unit and TGM<br />
monitor, provide automated data of mercury fractionation. This type of unit will greatly improve the<br />
effectiveness of future studies.<br />
Ozone and GEM were measured at Station Nord, NE Greenland, until June 2002. On the Faroe<br />
Islands, from May 2000 forward one year, and in Nuuk, Greenland from March 2002 and are still<br />
ongoing. GEM was only measured at Station Nord from February until July each year.<br />
3.3 Ozone measurements<br />
Ground level ozone was measured using an UV absorption monitor, Monitorlab 8810, with a<br />
detection limit of 1 ppbv and an uncertainty of 3 % for concentrations above 10 ppbv and 6 % for<br />
concentrations below 10 ppbv, (all uncertainties are at a 95% confidence interval).<br />
3.4 Gaseous elemental mercury measurements<br />
Gaseous elemental mercury, GEM, was measured with high time resolution using an automated<br />
dual channel, single amalgation, cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (CVAFS) mercury<br />
analyser, Tekran Analyser Model 2537 A, Tekran Inc., Toronto, Canada, following a standard<br />
operating procedure (SOP) written by Alexandra Steffen and W. Schroeder, for use at the high
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 31<br />
Arctic station, Alert, and distributed to other Arctic mercury research teams for standardization, as<br />
broadly as possible (Steffen and Schroeder, 1999).<br />
NERI adopted this SOP to the situation and resources that were available to us for our<br />
measurement campaigns. The major changes were the type of heated sampling line and quality<br />
control procedures. As we were not on site for the entire campaign period, we did not conduct a<br />
daily manual calibration of the machine, relying instead upon on the permeation tube as a secondary<br />
standard.<br />
By directly sampling the air, the machine measures total gaseous mercury, TGM, utilizing two<br />
channels. One channel is being sampled while the other is being thermally desorbed and then the<br />
function switches, allowing continuous sampling.<br />
Through introduction of a soda lime trap into the sampling chain, as well as a 45 mm diameter<br />
Teflon filter, to protect from the introduction of particulate matter, only the gaseous elemental<br />
mercury fraction is measured.<br />
Measuring GEM can also be achieved by introducing a KCl coated denuder into the sampling<br />
train, Figure 2., page 33, which captures only reactive gaseous mercury, as described below.<br />
Although it is the method utilized by Tekran for their automated mercury speciation unit, Model<br />
1130, it was not utilized as part of the present study’s mercury sampling chain, except by the<br />
American teams at Barrow, when reporting GEM.<br />
The principle of the Tekran 2537A instrument is cold vapour atomic fluorescence spectroscopy<br />
(CVAFS) and is described as follows: A measured volume of sample air is drawn through a gold<br />
trap that retains elemental mercury. The collected mercury is desorbed by heat and is transferred by<br />
argon into the detection chamber where the amount of mercury is detected by CVAFS.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 32<br />
The detection limit is 0.1 ng/m 3 and the reproducibility for concentrations above 0.5 ng/m 3 is<br />
within 20% on a 95% confidence interval. This is sufficient for quantification of RGM, and<br />
therefore also for using the annular denuders for flux measurements.<br />
Volatile organic mercury species such as dimethylmercury and monomethylmercurychloride<br />
may also react with the gold traps, however their contribution to the TGM fraction can be neglected<br />
under background conditions (Ebinghaus et al., 2001).<br />
In order to protect the instrument against passivation of the gold traps due to for example,<br />
humidity and sea salt in the air, a soda-lime trap, soda lime pellets in a Teflon cartridge, was placed<br />
in the sample line just before the 2137A analyser, as proposed by M. Landis, US EPA (personal<br />
communication) just before the 2001 season as humidity and sea salt can cause serious artefacts<br />
(Skov et al. 2003, paper 5, Appendix C). However, there was not observed any change in the<br />
general level of GEM after the installation of the trap. Experiments in Denmark, at 56 0 N with<br />
parallel measurements of GEM with and without soda lime trap showed a perfect agreement within<br />
the uncertainty established previously. A heated coil around the Teflon sampling line, imparted an<br />
effect of 50 0 C above ambient temperature in order to assure that mercury did not condense on the<br />
sampling lines.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 33<br />
3.5 RGM determination<br />
RGM was measured and analysed by the method developed by Landis et al. (2002). Dr. Landis<br />
along with Dr. Robert Stevens, trained this author on the coating and manual measurements and<br />
desorption technique at the US EPA at Research Triangle Park, prior to going to Barrow Alaska.<br />
The Landis et al., method for RGM determination uses a KCl coated quartz annular denuder<br />
Figure 2. The quartz denuder system from University Research Corporation (URG), North Carolina,<br />
used for the collection of RGM in ambient air. Diagram from URG catalogue. The KCl coating is in<br />
the annulus space, in the grey, sandblasted region. The inlet and outlet was carefully rinsed of KCl,<br />
and the coating was uniform, with no large crystals. Heating mantle not shown.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 34<br />
sampling chain heated to 50 0 C, to sample air, Figure 2., page 33, and is described in detail as cited<br />
so the sampling system and method will therefore only be briefly reviewed.<br />
At the inlet, there is an elutriator and an impactor, with impactor plate. The elutriator is coated<br />
in cross linked teflon. The elutriator straightens the flow and accelerates it, by forcing it through an<br />
orifice onto a roughened impactor plate with no coating applied. The cut-off diameter is 2.5 µm, so<br />
only the fine fraction of particles flows past the active area of the denuder. The sample flow is 10<br />
litres per minute. The flow is controlled just prior to the denuder chain with a “dry cal” flow meter<br />
prior to and after sampling.<br />
Immediately following the impactor, there is a dead space prior to the annulus. This allows for<br />
expansion of air, from ambient to 50 o C, since KCl optimally collects RGM at this temperature<br />
(Landis et. al, 2002); as well as proper development of laminar flow, which is a necessary condition<br />
for proper functioning of denuders.<br />
9 annular denuders were available: 6 new, belonging to NERI and 3 approximately 1 year old,<br />
belonging to ORNL; however, there were only 4 complete sampling systems as depicted in Figure<br />
2., page 33.<br />
Measurements made in Barrow were therefore with US EPA denuders and sampling systems,<br />
to include the annular denuder system employed in the reactive gaseous mercury flux system.<br />
The denuders were characterized in the laboratory of Dr. Lindberg at Oak Ridge National lab<br />
prior to field deployment.<br />
Upon receipt, denuders were physically inspected. The physical inspection is an important<br />
aspect of quality control prior to using the denuders and includes checking for cracks, and ensuring<br />
that the threads produce a tight seal. Each new denuder was then numbered 1 – 6, by carefully<br />
etching with a diamond pen. The 3 older denuders were numbered X1 – X3.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 35<br />
The denuders were then cleaned, coated, dried, and prepared according to the protocol for<br />
manual denuder measurements provided by Dr. Landis. As published in Landis et al., 2002.<br />
Each denuder was then tested for eventual variation of the blanks of the denuders. Denuders<br />
were also concurrently sampled in pairs to ensure that collocated precision was < 15%, in<br />
agreement with the findings reported for the method in Landis et. al., 2002.<br />
Denuders were exposed to laboratory air with relatively high RGM concentrations,<br />
approximately twice that expected in ambient air, due to the past and present use of HgCl2 in the<br />
building at Oak Ridge National Lab; and ambient air at Walker Branch Watershed Research Area,<br />
Oak Ridge, Tennessee with and without end caps to test if there was any appreciable passive<br />
diffusion. This is important since only one of three denuders is actively sampled in the flux system<br />
at any given time. Over the sampling period it is expected that the denuder will be idle, subject only<br />
to passive uptake two thirds of the total sampling time.<br />
The heating mantels are different than those used by Landis, et al., 2000, since theirs were<br />
judged to be too bulky for use in the flux system where at least two would be required. The heating<br />
mantels used in this work are originally developed while at NOAA, under guidance of chief<br />
engineer, Mark Hall. The original mantles are seen hanging from the tower in Figure 3., page 39.<br />
The heating mantles are described as follows: high temperature polyvinylchlorid, PVC, pipes,<br />
which allow for a 2 cm airspace around the outside of the annular denuder, and encloses the<br />
denuder from the tip of the inlet to the top of a filter pack at the outlet. The outer portion of the pipe<br />
is wrapped with a silver tape to ensure heat transfer from self-regulating heat tape. The heat tape is<br />
uniformly wrapped around the pipe and grounded on the metal tape. This is then covered with<br />
insulating tape. The length of the heating tape is manufacturer and electrical voltage dependent, but<br />
is cut long enough to heat the air inside the tube to 50 o C and keep it at that temperature.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 36<br />
Based on experience gained at Barrow, the heating mantles lost too much heat, so further<br />
improvement was made at NERI to the heating mantles prior to the Station Nord, 2002 campaign.<br />
The improvements are specifically: an extra layer of insulation, an extra hard shell for<br />
enhanced wind protection, silicone sealant to protect against water or melted snow and insulated<br />
end caps to warm from the inlet onwards. The original heating mantle assembly was placed inside a<br />
larger PVC pipe, allowing 5 cm spacing between sidewalls, giving an overall diameter of<br />
approximately 9.6 cm. The space between the two shells was then filled with self-expanding<br />
polyurethane foam thermal insulation. Upon drying, the insulation was cut, so that top and bottom<br />
end caps will fit snugly. The inside of the top and bottom caps are filled with foam cut to fit the<br />
inlet and outlet of the denuder. The heating mantle is sealed at each end with silicone, so that it is<br />
watertight. Other shells than PVC may be used, for example, metal tubing. This work chose<br />
thermally rated PVC since it was cost efficient.<br />
The result is a self-regulating heating mantle capable of producing the heating required for an<br />
efficient active coating temperature of 50 o C in the Arctic spring.<br />
page 53.<br />
The improved heating mantles are seen on the tower in the photo from Station Nord: Figure 5.,<br />
Once the air in the heating cap is heated and the denuder is heated to equilibrium, there is no<br />
heating gradient directly across the mantle wall to the denuder, as there is in heating mantles that<br />
employs direct application of heating tape to the denuder walls, since the airspace functions as an<br />
insulator, thus avoiding uneven heating and activation of the denuder coating, or over heating the<br />
coating.<br />
However, there is certainly a gradient and therefore expansion of air, as an air parcel travels<br />
through the denuder and becomes warmer. This is a source of experimental error that we
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 37<br />
investigated as part of this work, at Station Nord, 2002, by comparing RGM measurements in<br />
heated versus non-heated denuders.<br />
Never the less, for all flux measurements heating was kept constant, since the heat might affect<br />
the laminar flow within the denuder, the gas diffusion coefficient and the relative adherence of the<br />
gas to the KCl surface.<br />
After sampling, the quartz denuders were closed immediately with plastic caps equipped with<br />
teflon inner seals, and taken into the laboratory for thermal desorption:<br />
During sampling RGM is converted by KCl to HgCl2. HgCl2 is pyrolized to Hg(0) at<br />
temperatures above 370 o C, so heating the quartz tubes to 540 o C in a Lindberg tube oven, Lindberg<br />
Blue Tube Furnace Model Mini Mite, no. TF55030A-1, Serial Number Z11K-508436-ZK, ensures<br />
a complete pyrolization of RGM to Hg (0) over 15 minutes with a flow of purified air. Quartz filters<br />
are used to ensure a good seal between the annular denuder and the clamshell furnace, to help<br />
prevent direct heat escape, as are coaxial cooling fans, set to cool the denuder ends as the denuder is<br />
being heated. The effect of using and not using cooling fans was tested.<br />
The sample is introduced with charcoal filter purified air directly into a TEKRAN 2537A<br />
mercury analyser and quantified as follows:<br />
Three sampling runs were made prior to heating in order to test for leaks, and establish a blank<br />
value followed by three heated runs and then two runs at ambient temperature again. Each run is for<br />
5 minutes duration. If zero readings on the TEKRAN were not obtained after 3 heated runs then the<br />
denuders were washed and recoated in accordance with the procedure in Landis et al., 2002.<br />
Otherwise, the denuders were considered blanked, and ready for use again. Care was taken to<br />
keep the ends of the denuders cooled while the active area was being heated, by plugging the ends<br />
of the oven with quartz pads and using co-axial fans prior to and after the oven, so that only RGM<br />
captured on the active area was desorbed.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 38<br />
For all measurements a field blank was obtained by handling a denuder in the field. Hg Mass<br />
from this field blank was subtracted from the measured Hg masses on the exposed denuders.<br />
If there was any indication of Hg (0) adsorption, for example with sudden sharp increases in Hg<br />
amounts then the denuder was cleaned and re-coated, since as pointed out by Sheu and Mason,<br />
2001, just 1% of Hg (0) adsorption on a denuder is enough to compromise RGM measurements. It<br />
is therefore very important to carefully follow the prescribed methods, especially since annular<br />
denuders are used as part of the reactive gaseous mercury flux measurement system.<br />
All accuracies with the denuders were found to be in good agreement with those reported by<br />
Landis et al., 2002. In the Barrow 2001 campaign, the EPA manual denuders exhibited a precision<br />
of 10%, based on co-located parallel measurements.<br />
During sampling the denuders were kept constant at approximately 50 o C above ambient<br />
temperatures with the initial heating caps, or at 50 o C, with the improved heating caps. Temperature<br />
was verified by sliding a thermometer probe into the air surrounding the denuder between the outer<br />
wall of the denuder and the heating mantel, and measuring the air temperature. It is assumed that<br />
the denuder coating temperature is in equilibrium with the air temperature.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 39<br />
3.6 Flux measurements of reactive gaseous mercury by relaxed eddy accumulation<br />
Figure 3 Relaxed eddy accumulation system deployed on a tower support pole at NOAA CMDL, Barrow Alaska.<br />
The photo is toward Point Barrow, with the system oriented northeast, in the direction of prevailing<br />
winds coming from the Beaufort Sea, approximately 2 km from the station. NOAA CMDL is<br />
approximately 9 m above sea level, with a flat terrain profile. Metek Sonic anemometer mounted<br />
independently on 1 side of the support. 3 original heating mantels mounted behind the sonic<br />
anemometer. The two heating mantels to the right are for up and down channels, the heating cap to<br />
the left is for mid channel denuders. Original heating caps could warm the denuders to 50 0 C above<br />
ambient such that typical temperatures were 20 0 C. Black neoprene air hoses go to the black box that<br />
will be buried in the snow to hold the REA switches and other components warm. From left to right<br />
in the photo, S. Brooks, NOAA, M. Goodsite, NERI and M. Landis, US EPA. REA control system<br />
from Metsupport, Denmark. Courtesy of S. Lindberg, ORNL.<br />
Relaxed eddy accumulation, REA, is a micrometeorological method for trace gas flux<br />
determination. All micrometeorological systems require the measurement of the turbulent<br />
component of air and the measurement of the trace gas of interest. REA “relaxes” the requirement<br />
for instantaneous gas analysis by preferentially collecting air over time into some type of<br />
accumulator and analysing the trace gas in the collected sample after the sampling period.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 40<br />
Therefore any REA system requires collection of the trace gas of interest over time. When<br />
RGM is the trace gas of interest heated, KCl coated, annular denuders may be used as accumulators.<br />
Collection and measurement of RGM was discussed in the previous section. This section will<br />
present the measurement of the reactive gaseous mercury flux using the relaxed eddy accumulation<br />
system and its components.<br />
RGM flux measurements were performed from 29 March, 2001 through April 12, 2001, with<br />
the system set up at approximately 3 m above the snow pack surface on a guy-wire support of the<br />
NOAA, Barrow, CMDL tower, oriented into the prevailing winds, arriving from the Beaufort Sea.<br />
The measurements were made using a micrometeorological flux measurement system built by<br />
METSUPPORT aps, Denmark in January 2001 for this campaign. The system was designed in<br />
consultation with this author and Dr. Skov, together with the Director of METSUPPORT, Dr. P.<br />
Hummelshøj, with this new, Arctic application of REA in mind.<br />
METSUPPORT dubbed the system the Mobile REA Data Acquisition System, Model 1005-02,<br />
serial no. 10012, and shipped it directly to the author in Oak Ridge, where its components were<br />
tested at NOAA, ATDD and Walker Branch, prior to shipping to Barrow.<br />
This system was coupled with the Landis et al., 2002, annular denuder method for measuring<br />
RGM, and the previously described heating caps, as the sampling front end.<br />
The total system consists of 4 primary components:<br />
1. The sampling end, consisting of three annular denuder sampling trains and associated<br />
heating caps, with neoprene tubing running to the switches.<br />
2. A METEK, Germany, model USA-1 heated, sonic anemometer, serial no. 2000 12<br />
003/01 with a separate weather tight electronic box. The effect of the heating is 55 W,<br />
sufficient to prevent rime ice build up under Arctic conditions. The sonic provides<br />
airflow information as a 10 Hz serial data stream.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 41<br />
3. A data acquisition suitcase. The central component of the suitcase is an Advantech 4823<br />
single board computer, with a PC 104 bus. There is a relay card mounted on the bus to<br />
control switching valves and a 12 bit analogue input card for monitoring up to 6<br />
analogue input signals plus the supply voltage and an analogue zero channel. A RS422<br />
serial port on the Advantech computer allows serial data input from the sonic<br />
anemometer. A 3 ½ inch floppy disc drive is provided for data download and back-up.<br />
Automatic data back up is a function of the software. A 6 GB hard disk with a DOS<br />
operating system controls the REA data acquisition software, DAQ,<br />
METSUPPORT/Risø DAQ version 4.10, with integrated REA control. The initial<br />
software set up provides for automatic booting once power is supplied to the system. A<br />
60-minute run, made up of two minute archived statistical data blocks will start at either<br />
clock time 00 or clock time 30, unless manually bypassed. The REA control software<br />
has a deadband, based on a moving 10-minute standard deviation of the sonic vertical<br />
signal and an adaptive correction for tilt angle. The average tilt angle is calculated for<br />
every four-degree sector and the vertical component of the wind is corrected using this<br />
angle. The software used only the most recent 10 minutes to determine the average tilt<br />
angle, to best account for changes in flow regimes due to varying speed and stability.<br />
Therefore, the REA system will first start switching 10 minutes after it is started. The<br />
above software is designed to maximize the REA measurements. The deadband is<br />
discussed later in this thesis. The software output was written to write just basic data to<br />
the floppy drive at the end of each hour, i.e. run. This data includes those factors needed<br />
to calculate the flux and control the measurement including: run name, defined<br />
conveniently as the date and start time, average temperature for the run, average wind<br />
speed for the run, average wind direction for the run, the standard deviation of the
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 42<br />
vertical wind velocity, needed to calculate the REA flux, see later, and the value beta,<br />
also needed to calculate the vertical flux and the number of times each valve was<br />
switched in during the run. The data could only be retrieved by stopping the system, so<br />
data was seen only first after the sampling period. The text output file was not<br />
comparable with the file saved for each individual run, the .ACU extension files. In the<br />
text output file, the total number of counts did not add up to the total run time, and the<br />
value for the standard deviation of the vertical wind velocity and sometimes, beta, was<br />
different for the run than the value found in the .ACU file. Therefore, the .ACU values<br />
were used for consistency throughout analysis, since the counts in the .ACU file<br />
equalled the total run time. The data from the .ACU file for each run was imported by<br />
hand-typing into a spreadsheet where it was averaged for the entire sampling period and<br />
total sampling time for each denuder calculated by multiplying the switching time by the<br />
sampling frequency. The software allows adjustment of the sampling frequency and for<br />
the third channel, known as the MID channel to either remain open for constant, co-<br />
located sampling, or to open recording the air in the dead band, such that the sum of the<br />
three channels should equal concentrations contained from a separate constant sampling<br />
system, allowing some aspect of quality control, and employed for this study. The<br />
computer time was not internally changed for this study, but left at its original setting, 4<br />
hours ahead of Barrow, i.e., a run name with a start time noted as 20:00 was started at<br />
16:00 local time.<br />
4. A REA valve box, METSUPPORT model 1006-01, serial no. 10013, built to interface<br />
with the sampling front end with fast response valves, that are meant to run with 5 m<br />
long cables between the valve box and the switches, so that they might be mounted as<br />
close to the outgoing end of the denuder as possible. It was thought that heat from
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 43<br />
switching would keep the valves warm enough from freezing in the Arctic. This proved<br />
to be a faulty assumption, valves froze on the second day, so from the third campaign<br />
day forward, the valves along with the valve control box, sonic control box, mass flow<br />
controller, and pump were buried in the snow pack inside of a box, beside the tower to<br />
keep them warm enough to function.<br />
5. The system did not come with a power supply, just a 5 m long power cable, which was<br />
connected to a 24 volt DC power supply at Barrow by CMDL engineer Glenn<br />
McConville. The machine pulled 24 volts at 1.2 amperes. A Sonic cable, connecting the<br />
sonic control box, which was buried beside the tower, to the REA control suitcase,<br />
located in the garage of CMDL as well as a 50 m long cable connecting the control box<br />
to the valve switching box were included. Their plastic covers made them moveable<br />
only with pre-warming once laid out in the Arctic terrain, and great care was taken not to<br />
break them.<br />
A similar METSUPPORT system and components have been previously deployed by NERI for<br />
measuring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and is described in detail in Christensen et al. 2000.<br />
The REA flux measurement system was set up on a steel rod affixed to the CMDL tower guy-<br />
line support pole with the head of the sonic anemometer facing into the predominant wind direction,<br />
and oriented towards North. See Figure 3., page 39 and Figure 4., page 44. The support beam was<br />
hung such that the heating caps and therefore inlets of the sampling system were perpendicular to,<br />
and 1 meter behind the centrum of the sonic head. The inlets were 1-2 mm longer than flush<br />
protruding from the bottom of the heating caps. The denuders for the up and down draft were co-<br />
located nearest the centre of the mast, while the parallel measurements or denuders sampling the air<br />
that is not coming either as down or up, were located near the edges of the mast. The denuders are<br />
hung vertically so that particles do not fall onto the denuder walls. The denuders rest with gravity in
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 44<br />
the heating caps, due to the filter packs. A quartz filter was kept in each of the filter packs, to ensure<br />
a constant pressure drop. Flow was measured with a mass flow meter and a dry cal mass flow<br />
meter, prior to and after sampling, as was temperature in the heating caps. The dry cal meter and<br />
electronic mass flow meter were attached to the end of the sampling line with a quick connect, in<br />
the same manner the sampling line is attached from the denuder. A piece of Teflon tubing was used<br />
to connect the mass flow meter to a denuder inlet to ensure the proper sampling rate and adjustment<br />
of the mass flow controller. This adjustment was made at Walker Branch prior to system<br />
deployment and confirmed at Barrow.<br />
Figure 4. REA RGM system schematic<br />
3m above<br />
the snow<br />
pack<br />
Prevailing<br />
wind<br />
direction →<br />
REA control<br />
computer (up to 50<br />
m from the tower) or<br />
in a box beneath the<br />
tower, in the case of<br />
the NOAA system at<br />
Station Nord.<br />
1 m<br />
Sonic<br />
control<br />
box<br />
Switch<br />
control<br />
box<br />
Cross support perpendicular to<br />
predominant wind direction. Sonic is<br />
oriented North, and in the prevailing<br />
wind direction. Neoprene sampling<br />
lines between end of denuders for the<br />
up, down and mid channels and<br />
solenoid switches. Solenoids kept in<br />
a box under the snow pack to keep<br />
from freezing<br />
120 v power cables for:<br />
heating caps, pump,<br />
mass flow controller not<br />
depicted<br />
Mass flow<br />
controller
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 45<br />
From the quick connect at the top of the filter pack were connected 3.2 m long neoprene hoses into<br />
3 fast response switching valves supplied by MetSupport. From behind the switches, the three<br />
valves were connected into one sampling line using a simple 3 inlet manifold constructed with 2 T-<br />
type locking copper hose connectors in series and 1 L type locking hose connector as the end piece.<br />
Coming out of the manifold, a locking ball valve, was used to adjust and fix the flow, as a back<br />
up to the mass flow controller. Between the pump and the valve, a Tylan mass flow controller was<br />
used to ensure a flow prior to the manifold of just over 10 litre min -1 , so that the flow was measured<br />
as 10 litre min -1 at the denuder inlet. Pressure loss was minimal in the manifold and through the<br />
sampling lines. Once the system was running, the lag time from when the switch opened to when<br />
the flow started out the denuder was very small compared to the air sampling switching frequency<br />
of 1 Hz.<br />
Normally flux systems operate at air sampling switching rates of 10 Hz, switching as fast as the<br />
air flow is sampled with the sonic anemometer. The only lag time between the air and the switching<br />
comes from the software and physical switching process, including flow development in systems<br />
that do not have zero air induced into the sampling inlet system to stabilize the flow. This means<br />
that within one second the flow can effectively be changed between one accumulator to another 10<br />
times, sufficient for total air accumulators such as canisters or bags. Denuders are selective<br />
accumulators, collecting only the trace gas of interest, and require laminar flow. Given the<br />
geometry of the URG annular denuders, the 10 Hz sampling switching rate nominally allows for<br />
full laminar flow development and escape of an air packet through the end of the annular denuder.<br />
From initial measurements, it was immediately clear, that the annular denuders were not<br />
collecting efficiently while switching at 10 Hz, with RGM mass just above detection limits being<br />
collected. Therefore tests were carried out in Oak Ridge, on top of a 50 m tower at Walker Branch,<br />
to determine if the switching rate required for good reproduction of total RGM ambient
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 46<br />
concentration in a flux system sampling in three channels: up drafts, down drafts and all else, as<br />
compared to levels measured in parallel annular denuders under constant sampling conditions,<br />
could be set at 1 Hz.<br />
In these experiments flow rates were controlled by a Tylan mass flow controller and checked<br />
prior to and after the sampling period. The results of these experiments led to the sampling<br />
switching rate being set in the REA system to 1 Hz with the 10 litre per minute flow rate maintained<br />
by a mass flow controller. The air sampling-switching rate is so long compared to errors that could<br />
be induced from physical switching and software, that these are considered negligible. Zero air was<br />
not added to the sampling inlet system since this would mean that ambient air could not be directly<br />
sampled into the annular denuder, but that ambient air would have to flow through an additional<br />
inlet first. RGM is so reactive that it was thought best to directly sample it into the annular<br />
denuders. This is possible given the 1 Hz switching rate.<br />
Therefore, by sampling at 1 Hz, approximately 95% of the turbulence is captured and the best<br />
compromise between the meteorological measurements and chemical sampling is obtained in order<br />
to ensure a laminar flow in the annular denuders and thereby measure RGM flux most accurately<br />
Measurements were made as follows: The heating mantles are turned on approximately 1 hour<br />
prior to measurement. 4 annular denuders were prepared and blanked immediately prior to use: 3<br />
for the system and one as the field blank. Inlets are baked prior to field deployment unless<br />
contaminated by handling. Powder-free rubber gloves are used when handling the inlets. The<br />
denuders are then taken outdoors and carefully placed into the heating caps. Care is taken not to<br />
disturb the sonic alignment, or crack a denuder due to handling, nor handle the sampling inlet since<br />
the annular denuders are relatively fragile under Arctic weather conditions, and the inlets may<br />
easily be contaminated. Flow is checked in the sampling lines and temperature measured in the<br />
denuders. Once the temperature of the denuders has stabilized, the REA system is started by
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 47<br />
applying power, since there is an automatic start routine. A floppy disc is inserted into the floppy<br />
disk drive for data output. Air is then sampled at least for 4 hours, i.e. four REA system consecutive<br />
runs, sampling switching at 1 Hz in all three channels, if a separate RGM ambient air concentration<br />
is being measured. If the system is used to obtain the ambient concentration of RGM from constant<br />
sampling, then just the up and down channels are switched, and the mid channel remains open. The<br />
mass flow is adjusted in the manifold to just over 20 litres per minute.<br />
After the 4 hour sampling period, the system is turned off. The floppy disk is removed and data<br />
is imported and analysed as described previously. The annular denuders are taken off of the tower<br />
and tightly capped. The denuders are then analysed for RGM concentration as previously described.<br />
Flux and depositional velocity may then be calculated as described below.<br />
The best way to measure flux with a meteorological system, is instantaneously measuring a<br />
trace gas in an air parcel going up or down and correlating it with air mass exchange data, called<br />
“eddy correlation”. With present analytical techniques, this is not possible for reactive gaseous<br />
mercury, so relaxed eddy accumulation was used. Desjardins (1972) proposed a means of<br />
overcoming the problem of not being able to instantaneously measure the trace gas exchange<br />
simultaneously with the mass exchange of the air by proposing accumulating the air and airflow<br />
data over time, and completing the analysis after a finite sampling period, called “eddy<br />
accumulation”. Businger and Oncley (1990) further simplified this method by replacing the fast<br />
response trace gas analyser with fast response valves accumulators. This allows trace gases to be<br />
collected over time, each into their own accumulator: gases on the way up, or gases on the way<br />
down; and analysed after an appropriately long sampling time to ensure enough trace gas was<br />
accumulated to know if the observed difference in the up and down reservoirs was significant or<br />
not, and thus determine the flux.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 48<br />
The decision making data for the switches, i.e., sample into the up or down accumulator, from<br />
an instrument that provides airflow data to the REA control computer.<br />
All modern systems including the present system use a sonic anemometer. A sonic anemometer<br />
measures the three components of the wind velocity by determining the windspeed from the flight<br />
times of ultrasonic pulses across a fixed path of length l. Opposing transducers alternatively act as<br />
transmitters and receivers, sending ultrasonic pulses between themselves in direction 1 and 2. Thus<br />
the flight times in each direction are directly measured (2):<br />
t1 = l/(c+v) and t2 = l/(c-v) (2)<br />
where c is the speed of sound and v is the windspeed along the sound path.<br />
Solving for the windspeed v:<br />
v =(l/2)(1/t1-1/t2) (3)<br />
(2) may also be solved for the speed of sound c<br />
cmeasured = (l/2) (1/t1 + 1/t2) (4)<br />
This is then corrected to find the actual speed of sound, based on the fact that cmeasured is<br />
distorted by the component of wind perpendicular (normal) to the sound path, expressed by Kaimal<br />
and Gaynor (1991) as:<br />
cmeasured = ( ctrue 2 – vnormal 2 ) 1/2 (5)<br />
Via the ideal gas law, the pressure is related to the temperature. C is related to the adiabatic<br />
compressibility and therefore to the dry air properties. Without solving (5) further for ctrue = c , it<br />
can be seen that software algorithms readily can calculate c and thus calculate the temperature.<br />
However, to calculate c effectively, the humidity must be known.<br />
We did not measure humidity for this experimental set-up, since the pilot project was carried<br />
out in the arid high Arctic.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 49<br />
The temperature reading was however, used to control that the sonic anemometer system was<br />
running properly, since the temperature calculation is related to the flight time determination, as<br />
seen in (4), and if the path length determination in (4) manifested in unusual temperature readings,<br />
then necessarily the vector determination was affected, as seen from (3).<br />
Throughout the experiments, the sonic anemometer functioned well, though as will be<br />
discussed later, in Barrow, the sonic was not set on the tower properly, causing the down channel to<br />
be preferentially sampled. This was corrected analytically after the measurements as discussed later.<br />
It can be seen from (3) that the wind speed is not affected by the speed of sound in air and is<br />
therefore independent of temperature and thus pressure, as well as humidity, though temperature<br />
determination is humidity dependent.<br />
The METEK sonic anemometer, like all 3 dimensional sonic anemometers, arranges three pairs<br />
of transducers such that the three dimensional wind vector can be unambiguously derived for the<br />
local vector going through the centrum of the sonic anemometers plane. It does this by a non-<br />
orthogonal arrangement around the vertical axis of the instrument which has a rotational symmetry<br />
= 120 o , with each path having an angle of 45 o with reference to the horizontal.<br />
The instrument is set up completely level with a reference point on the axis aligned to magnetic<br />
North, so that information about the arrival direction of the wind parcel is properly recorded and the<br />
software provided transforms the information into the Cartesian coordinate system, which is sent to<br />
the REA system and translated to a switching decision.<br />
The system utilized had software that allowed it to run for 10 minutes, correcting for the tilt of<br />
the terrain. The tilt of the terrain creates a flow distortion that will bias results if not corrected for. If<br />
the instrument is not set up completely level, as turned out to be the case in Barrow, an artificial<br />
flow bias will be introduced, since the terrain correction program assumes the system is level.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 50<br />
Also, stopping the system every hour, to download and check data, negates the self-learning<br />
function of the system, thus causing it to have to “re-learn the terrain”, possibly introducing bias.<br />
The instrument is oriented to be exposed to the dominant wind direction, so that most flow arrives<br />
undisturbed over the terrain, with the sampling inlets as close to the centrum of the instrument as<br />
possible.<br />
With our large heating mantles, we effectively blocked one complete 180 0 wind sector however<br />
Prior to deployment to the field, we checked in Oak Ridge to ensure that there was no blocking<br />
effect or attenuation due to formation of a turbulent wake behind the instrument.<br />
This was done empirically with a blow dryer, observing the visual response to the system,<br />
pointing the blower at different directions around the system and adjusting the distances on the<br />
boom so that the system responded with switching as expected.<br />
We found that we could have the sampling system 1 meter behind the sonic anemometer and<br />
not effect flow from the 180 0 sector in front of the sampling system plane and assumed there were<br />
no observable effects from flow distortion due to convection from the heating mantles. However,<br />
due to the possibility of flow disturbance from the heating mantles, all data coming from behind the<br />
sampling train was considered suspect.<br />
The 10 Hz measurements of the vertical wind velocity control fast switching valves on three<br />
channels. When the wind is an updraft, upward air is sampled at 1 Hz in channel 1, when it is a<br />
downdraft, downward air is sampled at 1 Hz in channel 3 and when it is neither up nor down (or not<br />
blowing) it is considered in the deadband “0” and it is sampled at 1 Hz in channel 2.<br />
The area around 0 is called the dead band and is dynamic, and chosen so each channel is open<br />
about 1/3 of the time. Defining the deadband is an essential part of sampling control. The purpose<br />
of the deadband is to increase the conditional mean difference in the trace gases collected in the up
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 51<br />
draft and the down draft reservoirs, allowing for the most reliable determination of the difference in<br />
concentration in the two reservoirs and thus the best flux determination.<br />
An inherent disadvantage of using a constant deadband is a reduction of the effective sampling<br />
time for the updraft and the downdraft and thus this can also negatively impact concentration<br />
determination, and prolong total sampling time required.<br />
To maximize the advantages of the deadband, the Metsupport REA system uses a dynamic<br />
deadband, i.e. one which dynamically changes with the wind conditions, adjusting to the standard<br />
deviation in the vertical wind direction: σw.<br />
Many of the REA studies use a dynamic deadband around zero vertical velocity (e.g., Oncley et<br />
al., 1993, Guenther et al., 1996). Some use a constant deadband in order to create a constant and<br />
stable REA proportionality constant β. Bowling et al., (1999) use CO2 flux to maximize the<br />
difference in the scalar, not just the turbulence. In theory, there is no significant disadvantage for<br />
deadband values (wd) smaller than σw i.e. wd/ σw < 1, so it is not a necessity to use a system with a<br />
dynamic deadband in a system that switches as frequently as the sonic samples. The present system<br />
samples air flow at 10 Hz and switches at 1 Hz, so, to truly maximize the difference of RGM in the<br />
up and down channels, and thus lend confidence in the flux measurement, the dead band approach<br />
is best.<br />
Once RGM concentrations are obtained for the sampling period, the surface flux F of RGM is<br />
calculated from equation 6.<br />
F = βσv(C1-C3) (6),<br />
where β is an empirical coefficient, the “proportionality constant”, dependent on wind speed<br />
and turbulence, generally 0.6 for a fixed deadband and approximately 0.3 for a dynamic deadband,
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 52<br />
and calculated via the heatflux with the Metsupport system. σv is the standard deviation of the<br />
vertical wind velocity, approximately 0.18 over snow (Tilden Meyers, personal communication and<br />
empirical results from this work): both values are obtained directly as output from the REA system;<br />
C1 and C3 are the concentrations of RGM in upward and downward air masses, respectively.<br />
From the flux measurements the depositional velocity of RGM can be calculated if the ambient<br />
concentration for RGM is known:<br />
vd = F/C (7),<br />
where C is the concentration of RGM, and F is from 6. The corollary to depositional velocity is<br />
surface resistance. As depositional velocity increases, surface resistance decreases. The data<br />
required to calculate surface resistance was not readily available from the Metsupport REA system<br />
output file, but can be modelled given the depositional velocity and snow conditions. Modeling of<br />
surface resistance is discussed later.<br />
Due to the uncertainty of the concentration measurements in Barrow: 10 % and of the<br />
meteorological measurements, 10 % for β, σw for the Metsupport system (Christensen et al., 2000)<br />
the uncertainty on the flux measurements using the Landis et al., 2002, sampling end, heating caps<br />
and Metsupport REA system are estimated to be within 40% on a 95% confidence interval, though<br />
20% would be a more realistic estimate of denuder precision, given the fact that flow at 10 lpm is<br />
not instantaneously developed, so there is necessarily some flow and turbulence information lost<br />
when switching at 1 Hz. This gives a conservative sampling error for flux as 60% for the above<br />
system in Barrow.<br />
As a quality assurance check for the REA flux measurements, the total concentration of the<br />
three annular denuders for each run was compared with ambient concentration a collocated manual
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 53<br />
denuder system. Results varied with differences from 3% to 78%. On average, outliers excluded,<br />
they were within 25% of each other.<br />
The system as deployed at Station Nord, Greenland with the improved heating caps, software<br />
and control system is seen in Figure 5., page 53.<br />
Figure 5. The improved NOAA REA system installed at Station Nord, April 2002 at 3m above<br />
the snow pack, with the Metsupport REA system deployed as a backup, Note METEK sonic<br />
anemometer to lower left, heating mantles and actinic flux monitor to the right. Switches,<br />
pumps and controls in the black box buried in the snow pack to keep from freezing. Author on<br />
the tower, blocking view of the RM Young sonic anemometer used in the NOAA system. The<br />
tower was set up during the summer prior to the expedition in May 2002. Terrain with little<br />
snowdrift, and 1-week-old footprints, attest to the stability of the weather during the<br />
campaign. Ridges in background are pressure ridges from sea ice on the Wandel Sea. Photo:<br />
Henrik Skov, NERI<br />
To summarize: RGM is collected in three heated KCl coated annular denuders as part of the<br />
RGM flux measurement system, since in the flux system air is collected into two reservoirs: one for<br />
up drafts and one for down drafts. Each of these therefore requires its own annular denuder
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 54<br />
sampling train and heating cap. Sampling was over a 4 hr. sampling period, to minimize the chance<br />
of break through, a possibility because of the relatively high RGM levels expected in the Arctic<br />
during mercury depletion events. Break through is what occurs when the active surface is used up,<br />
or passivated, and can no longer adsorb the gas; thus the gas is said to “break through” the upstream<br />
end of the denuder and lower than actual levels are measured.<br />
RGM collected in the denuders is analysed by thermal desorption following the sampling<br />
period. Manual measurements of reactive gaseous mercury were therefore necessary to obtain the<br />
mercury mass in each annular denuder in the flux measurement system with the RGM concentration<br />
in the sampling period for each denuder subsequently calculated based on sampling time<br />
information and flow rate from the REA system. The difference in concentration found for the up<br />
channel denuder and down channel denuder are multiplied by two factors obtained for the sampling<br />
period as output from the REA control system: the standard deviation of the vertical wind velocity<br />
and the coefficient beta. Flux is then calculated. By dividing with the total ambient RGM<br />
concentration for the sampling period, concurrently measured with the third channel in the flux<br />
machine, or obtained as a sum of the three channels, the depositional velocity was calculated.<br />
For the flux measurements with the REA system, the two collocated denuders acting as<br />
accumulators for collected RGM over the sampling period must provide faithful representations of<br />
the amount of RGM in air masses that are either moving up, or coming down, since differences in<br />
these two denuders are used to calculate the flux.<br />
REA systems that have used denuders as the trace gas accumulators, e.g., Zhu et al., 2000,<br />
generally have three denuders in each of the up and mid channel, so that the difference in<br />
concentration, required for the REA flux calculation, is the difference between the average of the<br />
concentration determined in three denuders in each channel, providing more confidence to the<br />
measurement. The present system was a pilot system, with resources for just one annular denuder
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 55<br />
for each channel, at best two in the up and down, without using the mid channel. Two denuders<br />
sampling trains in the up and down channels and none in the mid was not satisfactory. First, an<br />
average of two measurements does not provide more confidence than just a single measurement,<br />
second, we would be giving up the ability to indirectly control our measurements as follows: The<br />
third collocated denuder in the mid channel, sampled in the deadband, so that RGM total ambient<br />
concentration, could be determined afterwards as the sum of the concentration in the three bands<br />
and compared with co-located RGM concentration measurements. It is assumed that if these two<br />
total concentration values were close to each other, then the system was functioning properly.<br />
However, it is realized that controlling the flux measurement indirectly in this manner does not<br />
prove that flux measurements were actually representative of the true flux.<br />
Upon returning from Barrow, the system was taken to Walker Branch watershed for further<br />
experiments relating to establishing the sampling rate. At a meeting in Oak Ridge in April, 2001, it<br />
was decided between the author, Dr. Skov, and Dr.’s Meyers and Brooks that NOAA ATDD would<br />
develop an improved REA system for the collaborative efforts in the Arctic, taking advantage of the<br />
lessons learned from the Barrow campaign, and improve the software and control system.<br />
Dr. Brooks brought the NOAA system to NERI in November 2001 where it was intercompared<br />
with the Metsupport system, and the NERI team was trained on its use. Major improvements<br />
included software: button type operation, with online graphical data, so that any sampling problems<br />
are seen during the run, and not post sampling period. The data in run files matched the data in the<br />
output file. The entire unit except for the sampling is self-contained in just one box. The new<br />
control box has the capability of hooking up to any laptop or PC with standard serial cables. The<br />
software can be downloaded on any L<strong>IN</strong>UX operating system PC, alleviating the hardware<br />
dependency with the previous system. The system is set up to use a different sonic anemometer,
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 56<br />
from RM Young. It utilizes the same front-end sampling system, a dynamic deadband, and also<br />
employs switching at 1 Hz.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 57<br />
3.7 Peat analysis<br />
The author was the manager and one of the principle investigators for the international and<br />
interdisciplinary peat project “long term records of atmospheric deposition of Hg, Pb, Cd and POPs<br />
in the Arctic” with Prof. William Shotyk as the chief scientist.<br />
Peat localities were chosen, primarily based on pre-existing geological or botanical studies<br />
for the area, so that any trace metal knowledge gained would be complementary to previous studies,<br />
and as the data from previous studies would be supplemental to the trace metal studies.<br />
Once reconnoitred, the sites judged to be the best, i.e., apparently topographically and<br />
hydrologically isolated, deep, non-disturbed, ombrotrophic type mosses, were sampled, typically on<br />
the lawn of the peat hummock, i.e., halfway between the hummock and hollow. Peat monoliths<br />
were taken with a titanium Wardenaar corer (Wardenaar, 1987).<br />
In the high Arctic, due to the need for automated coring through the permafrost, samples<br />
were cored from the top of the hummock. Hollow peat was sampled as well, since it represents<br />
modern growth. Frozen arctic peat does not allow readily sampling, so an automated peat sampler,<br />
was developed for this work. The version taken to Bathurst improved, by coating with teflon, and<br />
redesigning the cutting blades and top cap of the bore, prior to being taken to Nordvestø. Details of<br />
this sampler and its use are given in Noernberg et al, 2003, Appendix C.<br />
After sampling in the field peat was packaged and frozen for and during transport, where it<br />
was then processed in the laboratory at either University of Berne, Geological institute, or in the<br />
case of high Arctic peat, at the University of Heidelberg Institute for Environmental Geochemistry.<br />
The cores to be analysed for trace elements were sliced while still frozen, every 1 cm and sub<br />
sampled.<br />
The "zero" depth of the monolith was taken to represent the interface between the living plant<br />
material at the top, and the underlying dead plant matter, peat. For high Arctic peat, the coring
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 58<br />
started after clearing a block of very freeze-thaw cracked peat representing the active layer,<br />
typically 8 to 10 cm above the permafrost.<br />
Individual slices were trimmed of ca. 2.5 cm of edge material for monoliths and 1 cm edge<br />
material for high Arctic cores, assumed to be contaminated. Those slices where analyses would take<br />
place, typically every centimeter in the top portion of the core, and every second or third centimeter<br />
in the lower portion were subsampled using a stainless steel microcorer, ca. 16 mm ID, to recover<br />
ca. 2 cm 3 plugs from every centimeter slice set to be analyzed. The microcores taken from the<br />
center of the samples were reserved for dating purposes, to allow for a continuous stratigraphy.<br />
Microcores taken for mercury analyses were otherwise taken from different quadrants of the slice.<br />
These cores were air-dried overnight at room temperature in a Class 100 laminar flow clean air<br />
cabinet, to constant weight. Mercury concentrations were measured in these plugs using the<br />
methods described below. The Hg concentration profiles presented in the papers in Appendix C,<br />
except for Goodsite et al., 2002, are made by Dr. Roos, University of Berne, as they expanded upon<br />
the preliminary measurements made by this author. However, as reported in the papers, this<br />
author’s measurements are in excellent agreement with the latest measurement series, produced by<br />
her. Mercury in cores from Nordvestø, Carey Islands has been analyzed in one core, by the author<br />
and Ms. Nicole Rausch, University of Berne, Institute of Environmental Geology. Additional cores<br />
from Nordvestø are presently being analyzed at the NERI laboratory and the results are not<br />
available at the time of this writing.<br />
Peat samples were analysed for mercury at two laboratories by this author, at the Geological<br />
Institute, University of Bern, Switzerland, and Institute of Environmental Geochemistry, University<br />
of Heidelberg. Using solid sample atomic absorption spectroscopy (Salvato and Pirola, 1996) with a<br />
LECO AMA 254 total mercury analysis instrument. Peat is sliced and sub sampled frozen as<br />
described later, using care not to contaminate the samples. Sub samples are dried, homogenized and
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 59<br />
weighed into Ni sampling boats that have been blanked in the AMA 254 prior to use. Samples are<br />
then placed into the machine, one sample at a time. They enter a combustion chamber where they<br />
are dried, then are thermally decomposed in a stream of pure oxygen. Gases from the thermal<br />
decomposition are then carried in the oxygen stream into a catalyst chamber, which fully<br />
decomposes the gases at a temperature of 750°C. Mercury is thereafter carried with the oxygen<br />
stream onto and trapped on a gold amalgamator situated immediately after the catalyst chamber.<br />
The amalgamator is then heated to 500°C to release the Hg, which is carried with the oxygen stream<br />
into a cuvette, and mercury determined using atomic absorption spectrometry, with the mercury<br />
absorption line at 254 nm.<br />
The detection limit of the instrument is 0.01 ng Hg and the working range is 0.05-600 ng Hg,<br />
with reproducibility being
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 60<br />
a permanent pink colour was obtained, in order to maintain an oxidizing environment and prevent<br />
loss of Hg. The samples were then diluted with 18 MΩ water to approximately 25 g in polyethylene<br />
bottles. Mercury concentrations were determined following reduction with sodium borohydride in a<br />
flow injection AAS system, Perkin Elmer FIMS. The data set obtained using this procedure is in<br />
good agreement with the data obtained using the LECO AMA 254, on average, for Southern<br />
Greenland and Denmark, within 15%, r2 = 0.727, n=65. The total mercury data for Nordvestø is<br />
also being controlled in the above manner. Total mercury in peat from the Faroe Islands was<br />
controlled at the University of Maine Department of Geology, Dr. Steve Norton, using hydride<br />
generation atomic fluorescence spectrophotometry after acid dissolution. Each of these<br />
collaborators also independently measured additional material from the sampling sites as part of the<br />
total investigation.<br />
Total lead and other trace elements were determined using X-ray fluorescence on powders.<br />
Subsamples were dried overnight at 105 0 C in a drying oven, or in the case of high Arctic peat,<br />
freeze dried, and milled in a centrifugal mill equipped with a Ti rotor and 0.25 mm Ti sieve,<br />
Ultracentrifugal Mill ZM 1-T, F. K. Retsch GmbH and Co., Haan, Germany. The Energy-dispersive<br />
Miniprobe Multielement Analyzer (EMMA) using Mo Kβ as the exciting radiation was thereafter<br />
used to non-destructively measure selected major and trace elements (Pb, As, Fe, Mn, Ti, Zr, K, Ca,<br />
Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Br, Rb, Sr, Y). Calibration, lower limits of detection, accuracy, and precision of the<br />
method are given elsewhere (Shotyk et al., 2000).<br />
Additional physical and chemical analyses of the samples were performed to verify the<br />
trophic state of the peat. These are detailed in the papers in Appendix C and will not be discussed<br />
here.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 61<br />
Stable lead isotope measurements were also made as a tool to help explain and convince that<br />
the profiles provide reliable reconstructions of atmospheric mercury and lead. The procedures used<br />
by the project colleagues who performed these analyses are detailed in papers 8 and 9.<br />
One of the most difficult determinations to make in sampled peat is dry bulk density, DBD,<br />
determination. Dry bulk density is essential however to later calculating trace metal accumulation<br />
rates, or for modeling the dates based on peat accumulation. As will be discussed later, the accurate<br />
determination of density in peat samples is a subject that requires further research.<br />
3.8 Age dating of peat profiles<br />
The 14 C bomb pulse method<br />
The author completed the development of a direct high resolution dating method, shown to be<br />
feasible during the authors’ MSc thesis. The method is 14 C based, and uses macrofossils from the<br />
peat profile. It is published and for details the reader is referred to Goodsite et al., 2002, Appendix<br />
C.<br />
The expertise of a paleo-botanist, W.O. van der Knaap, Univeristy of Bern, Institute of Plant<br />
Science, University of Berne, or paleo ecologist, Ole Bennike, Geological Survey of Denmark and<br />
Greenland (GEUS), in the case of the Carey Islands, was necessary for appropriate selection of<br />
plant macrofossils identified in sub samples from the cores where trace metal analysis would be<br />
carried out.<br />
To prevent modern fungal growth, the macrofossils were processed within one week of sub-<br />
sampling, at the AMS 14 C Dating Laboratory, University of Aarhus, using a standard procedure for<br />
plant material: washed, acid-base-acid treatment, this author performed the analysis for the samples<br />
from Denmark and Greenland.<br />
Percent modern carbon in the macrofossils were determined using 14 C Accelerator Mass<br />
Spectrometry (AMS). By comparing the measured percent modern carbon in the samples to a<br />
calibration curve of atmospheric and terrestrial measurements for the northern most northern
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 62<br />
hemisphere (Goodsite et al., 2002) individual samples more recent than AD 1950 could be dated<br />
directly with high time resolution, ± 2 years. Samples that stopped respiration between this period<br />
and 1995 have elevated levels of carbon 14, since thermonuclear testing led to elevated 14 C levels in<br />
the atmosphere. Using AMS, these levels can be directly measured and correlated with the curve,<br />
not utilizing the conventional method of half-life decay of 14 C.<br />
Selected samples from deeper layers, dating from before AD 1950, could not use this method<br />
and were AMS 14 C dated by the usual tree-ring calibration method, with much larger uncertainties<br />
to follow or by 210 Pb dating.<br />
Pb-210 dating<br />
1,5 grams of solid sample powders along with water content and dry bulk density information<br />
were sent to Professor Peter G. Appleby, University of Liverpool, for age dating using the 210 Pb<br />
constant rate of supply model (Appleby and Oldfield, 1978). This method results in a model<br />
providing chronological information spanning the last approximately 200 years. Further details are<br />
discussed in the papers where employed. Comparison of 210 Pb age dating with the Goodsite et al.,<br />
2002 atmospheric bomb pulse method of the same set of peat samples, is found in the paper,<br />
Appendix C.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 63<br />
4. Results and Discussion<br />
Laboratory experiments<br />
The laboratory experiments were carried out in the lab of Dr. Steven Lindberg, in the<br />
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA. The building has a<br />
common ventilation system, turned off after work hours to save energy, and many scientists in the<br />
building have used mercuric chloride for their experiments. Therefore RGM levels are<br />
approximately twice as high as what is expected for ambient, though comparable with<br />
measurements at Station Nord, just prior to an AMDE. None of the denuders were heated in the<br />
laboratory; the denuders were at room temperature, approximately 23 0 C.<br />
In Figure 6., page 64, the annular denuders were hung in parallel, in the laboratory; and allowed to<br />
sample for 1 to 2 hours during the day and for 16 hours during the night and into the weekend.<br />
Concentration levels may be slightly underestimated since the denuders were not heated for the<br />
experiments. The figure shows that denuders that are 1 year old, X1 and X2 appear to be<br />
functioning just as well as denuders that are new: numbers 1-5. Reproducibility is within 10%,<br />
except for the first experiment. Denuders were cleaned and recoated after each use. The results<br />
show that under laboratory conditions, where HgCl2 is expected to be the dominating RGM species,<br />
that non-heated KCl coated denuders are able to collect a significant amount of RGM at ambient<br />
temperature in a reproducible manner.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 64<br />
pg Hg/m3<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0<br />
1:40<br />
Threw out X1, could not<br />
obtain a low zero prior to<br />
development<br />
2:00<br />
Active sampling<br />
16:00 (Night)<br />
50 min<br />
40 min<br />
1 2 3 4 5 X1 X3 X2 1 2 4 5<br />
2 denuders per run, Sampling time as noted<br />
16:00<br />
(Night)<br />
Figure 6. Parallel determination of reactive gaseous mercury concentration over one week inside of Dr.<br />
Steven Lindberg’s mercury laboratory, Environmental Science Division Building, Oak Ridge<br />
National Laboratory; during night time and daytime, January 2001. RGM is collected over<br />
non-heated annular denuders; with a 10 lpm flow rate. The times shown are hours or minutes<br />
exposed. Method used is by Landis et al., 2002, except that heating mantles were not<br />
employed.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 65<br />
Pg Hg/hr<br />
0,14<br />
0,12<br />
0,1<br />
0,08<br />
0,06<br />
0,04<br />
0,02<br />
0<br />
One cap off Horiz.<br />
72 hrs.<br />
Passive absorption rate<br />
Filt. Packs, Impactors, Vertical<br />
24.5 hrs.<br />
Both caps off Horizontal,<br />
Night<br />
17 hrs<br />
Caps, impactors,<br />
Vert.<br />
217 hrs.<br />
1 2 3 4 1 3 X3<br />
2 denuders per run. Run 1 was over the weekend, 2:3 was<br />
one complete day, 4:1 was overnight, 3:X3 was passively<br />
sampled ca. 9 days<br />
Figure 7. Annular denuders were passively exposed, both in vertical and horizontal positions, with and<br />
without end caps to laboratory air in Dr. Steven Lindbergs’ Laboratory, Environmental<br />
Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory in January, 2001; average concentration,<br />
60 -80 pg m -3 is a factor ten lower than in the Arctic under mercury depletion. The run with<br />
denuders 2 and 3 are set up, as denuders would be in the field for RGM determination.<br />
Comma used as a decimal holder.<br />
The relaxed eddy accumulation system is set up by virtue of its dynamic deadband to sample<br />
each channel approximately 1/3 of the total run time. This means that for 1 channel during a total<br />
run of 6 hours, the annular denuder will be actively sampled 2 hours, and the other 4 hours, exposed<br />
to possible passive uptake. Therefore, it was important to quantify any passive uptake in the<br />
denuders. After obtaining an analytical zero, annular denuders were tested horizontally and<br />
vertically with and without end caps or filters for passive uptake. They were deployed without<br />
pumping for a number of hours, taken down and analysed. Passive uptake was defined as the total<br />
mass minus the blank value, divided by the number of hours deployed. Results were variable, but
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 66<br />
generally reproducible as seen with the parallel measurements. The highest passive uptake resulted<br />
from denuders deployed in the total sampling train, from inlet to filter pack with filter, exposed for<br />
24.5 hrs in the laboratory, during the workweek, non heated. They were started in the morning and<br />
analysed the next morning, resulting in a passive uptake of 0.12 pg Hg per hour.<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
RGM mass (pg Hg)<br />
6 1 2 3 4 Average Std. Dev.<br />
Figure 8. Mass of RGM collected concurrently in 4 annular denuders, 2 co-located parallel measurements,<br />
in the laboratory of Dr. Steve Lindberg, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.<br />
Figure 8., page 66, is a reproducibility experiment run with 4 co-located, non-heated denuder<br />
sampling trains. Denuders 1 – 4 are actively sampled while denuder 6 is blanked handled and hung<br />
without any sampling. Denuders are connected to a single pump via 2 T-type connectors as flow<br />
splitters. Flow was controlled in each inlet with a mass flow meter. Denuder 6 is the field blank and<br />
reported concentrations have the filed blank subtracted. Of the 4 denuders, only denuder three had a<br />
value less than the three other denuders, 10% error taken into consideration.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 67<br />
pg/m 3<br />
pg/m 3<br />
90.00<br />
80.00<br />
70.00<br />
60.00<br />
50.00<br />
40.00<br />
30.00<br />
20.00<br />
10.00<br />
Cold and warm heating Mantles, RGM measurements 2002<br />
Cold heating mantle<br />
Warm heating mantle<br />
0.00<br />
16-apr 17-apr 18-apr 19-apr 20-apr 21-apr 22-apr 23-apr 24-apr 25-apr<br />
Time<br />
Figure 9. Parallel measurements of RGM at Station Nord, Greenland. Warm denuders were +50 0 C cold<br />
denuders were at ambient temperature, approximately -30 0 C each point represents the<br />
averaged concentration of two denuders. Note: Results near 0.00 pg m -3 cover each other, for<br />
cold and warm denuders.<br />
In Figure 9., page 67, it is seen that the annular denuders heated to 50 0 C using the improved<br />
heating caps, give higher RGM concentration values, when RGM concentrations are higher than<br />
approximately 10 pg m -3 and when there is apparently little, 5 pg m -3 or no RGM, the heated or non-<br />
heated denuders report the same amounts. Each point represents the average of parallel<br />
measurements.<br />
Controlling the heating of the denuders is not just important in the field, but as seen from Figure<br />
10., page 68, also important during laboratory analysis. Landis et al., 2002 note the need for coaxial<br />
fans and good insulation to limit the heat escaping from the clamshell denuder oven and warming<br />
the teflon sampling lines connecting the denuder to the charcoal filter on the inlet side, and the<br />
mercury monitor on the outlet side. Figure 10., page 68, is an experiment where a single denuder,
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 68<br />
denuder 1, is analysed for its blank value, with and without use of coaxial fans. Without use of fans,<br />
mass values are seen to increase, probably as a result of ambient uptake through the non-cooled,<br />
therefore warm to the touch, teflon sampling lines.<br />
It is seen that heating or non-heating of the denuders may bias the distribution. In the field the<br />
denuders should be heated to a constant temperature, especially for parallel measurements, or the<br />
values may not be comparable. Such is the case as well for intercomparison of data between two<br />
Arctic sites using different heating systems. In the laboratory, the method of Landis et al., 2002<br />
must be followed to avoid introducing sampling artefacts.<br />
Pg RGM (mass)<br />
3<br />
2,5<br />
2<br />
1,5<br />
1<br />
0,5<br />
0<br />
Analytical Zero test<br />
1 prior 1 1 1 1 1<br />
Denuder 1 sequentially run (once temp. fell to 50 deg. C) from left to right, not removed from machine<br />
Figure 10. Denuder nr. 1 analysed for analytical blank value in series with and without coaxial cooling. The<br />
first result shown is from the previous analysis of denuder 1 prior to the experiment.; the next<br />
two are without using a coaxial heating fan, the next two with, and the last two without. The<br />
denuder was not removed from the oven. The oven was allowed to cool to 50 0 C prior to start<br />
of next analysis.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 69<br />
4.1 Ozone and GEM Measurements<br />
The results of ozone and GEM measurements for Station Nord are shown in Figure 11, page<br />
69. It is seen that ozone is relatively stable from September/October until the end of<br />
February/beginning of March, then a highly perturbed period occurs, where ozone and GEM are<br />
simultaneously depleted to 0, from respectively about 40 ppbv and 1.5 ng/m 3 within hours. They<br />
remain at 0 for up to several days when they suddenly rise again, to levels above normal ambient<br />
levels seen in July. In July the ozone concentration stabilises slightly above 20 ppbv followed by a<br />
slow increase to about 40 ppbv in September/October.<br />
GEM was only measured from February to the end of July or beginning of August. The<br />
measurements were focusing on the description of the AMDE. Previously Schroeder et al. (1998)<br />
Ozone, ppbv<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1999<br />
2000<br />
2001<br />
Time<br />
Ozone<br />
GEM<br />
1/10*fBr<br />
Figure 11. Hourly ozone mixing ratios and weekly concentration of filterable bromine, fBr,<br />
measured from 1999 to 2002 at Station Nord, Northeast Greenland. GEM is measured in the<br />
period from 25 September 1999 to 23 August 2000; 14 February 2001 to 23 August 2001 and<br />
26 April to 29 June 2002. In general the half-life of GEM at Station Nord is approximately 10<br />
hours during AMDE. From Skov et al., 2003, submitted, Appendix C.<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
GEM,Br, ng/m 3
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 70<br />
have described that ozone and GEM are simultaneously depleted and that their depletion are highly<br />
correlated. The Station Nord data confirms this, see Figure 12., page 70, After the depletion period<br />
some very high concentrations of GEM appeared with values up to above 2 ng/m 3 and in 2002 up to<br />
4.5 ng/m 3 . In 2001, similar observations were made at Barrow (Lindberg et al. 2002, Appendix C).<br />
The high values after a depletion event are attributed to re-emission of mercury to the atmosphere<br />
(Lindberg et al., 2002). The interruption of the GEM time series at Station Nord in the middle of the<br />
summer makes it difficult to further interpret the importance of re-emission at Station Nord.<br />
GEM, ng/m 3<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
-0.5<br />
y = 0.039x - 0.095<br />
R 2 = 0.800<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Ozone, ppbv<br />
Figure 12. GEM against ozone concentrations at Station Nord, Northeast Greenland including<br />
a regression line obtained by orthogonal regression analysis. Data was selected from Fig. 11<br />
where at least 3 consecutive concentrations were decreasing on both ozone and GEM and the<br />
initial GEM concentration was above 0.4 ng m -3 . Only data from 2000 and 2001 were used as<br />
high concentrations in 2002 indicates the presence of other processes than in 2000 and 2001.<br />
The R 2 of approximately 0.8 was typical for the 2000 and 2001 campaigns. From Skov et al.,<br />
2003, submitted, Appendix C.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 71<br />
4.2 RGM concentrations and Flux<br />
Figure 13., page 71, shows the result of the RGM measurements at Station Nord in 2002. The<br />
measurements were made by manually sampling and using the improved heating caps, with<br />
temperatures in the heating caps approximately 40 0 C, or some 80 0 C above ambient. Bar thickness<br />
is proportional to exposure time. The thicker bars in the histogram were exposed more hours than<br />
the thinner bars. Data is field blank corrected. The concentration varies between values below<br />
detection limit and up to 75 ng m -3 . These values are comparable to those found at Barrow before<br />
the start of strong AMDE’s (Lindberg et al. 2002) and very typical for calm weather conditions.<br />
pg/m 3<br />
Pg m-3<br />
Figure 13. Manual RGM measurements made during April,2002 at Station Nord<br />
80.00 80<br />
70.00 70<br />
60.00 60<br />
50.00 50<br />
40.00 40<br />
30.00 30<br />
20.00 20<br />
10.00 10<br />
0.00 0<br />
7-apr 9-apr 11-apr 13-apr 15-apr 17-apr 19-apr 21-apr 23-apr 25-a<br />
Time Date<br />
The relaxed eddy accumulation system operating at 10 m above the tree top canopy on the<br />
tower at Walker Branch Research Area, Oak Ridge showed no mass uptake in the up or down tubes<br />
operating at 10 Hz; n = 3. The frequency was adjusted to 1 Hz and the measurable flux; n=3; 1 Hz
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 72<br />
and the additive product of the denuders, up, mid, down were within 25% of the constantly sampled<br />
denuder. There was a good mass balance between the up and down channel.<br />
The results of the 2001 campaign in Alaska (Barrow Arctic Mercury Study (BAMS)) are<br />
shown in Table 1. page 73 and Figure 14 page 77. The largest deposition velocity in 2001 was<br />
approximately 2.8 cm s -1 and the average was close to 1 cm s -1 . Concentrations of the three denuder<br />
tubes, up, mid and down, were added together to determine the total concentration, and<br />
concentration was compared with the on site Tekran automatic RGM monitor, MODEL 1130,<br />
described in Lindberg et al., 2002, Appendix C. Since the machines were not running absolutely<br />
simultaneously, a linear interpretation was made to compare concentrations for the same time<br />
frame. The heating system for the annular denuder heating system for the 1130 kept the denuders<br />
warmer than the heating mantles on the REA system. Not taking run two into account, since a<br />
valve was frozen open, it is seen that the percent difference varies, with an average for the<br />
campaign of 24% with a standard deviation of 42. Percent difference between the two<br />
measurements was as small as 3% and as large as 78%. It is seen that in all but 2 of the runs, run 2<br />
excluded, the RGM REA total is less than the 1130 value, perhaps because of differences in the<br />
heating mantle system or in differences of flow calibration between the two systems.<br />
The REA system when properly on the tower, after a period of time should report the same<br />
number of counts per up and down channel, due to conservation of mass, and did so prior to<br />
deployment in Barrow at Walker Branch. In Barrow, there was always a greater number, up to 30%<br />
more, of counts on the down channel, suggesting that the sonic anemometer was not positioned<br />
properly. Therefore the channel count data was corrected to ensure mass conservation as follows:<br />
1) Corrected counts in Down = registered counts in Down - (registered counts in Down – counts in up).<br />
Control: total counts for all channels registered = total counts with down corrected.<br />
2) Corrected Counts for Mid = registered Counts for Mid - (Registered Counts for Down - corrected<br />
counts for Down); The lost mass must be placed in mid channel for later concentration calculation.<br />
Control: Corrected counts Mid > registered counts mid, but total counts all channels still the same.<br />
3) Corrected Counts Up = Old Counts up Up, since down was preferred during sampling.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 73<br />
4) New Total Volume for each denuder = New count * 10 l per second (fixed)<br />
Control: registered total Volume = Corrected total volume<br />
Control: registered total mass, RGM in ng Hg (0) = new total mass RGM, ng Hg (0).<br />
6) New concentration: New mass / New volume<br />
Run dates and time, reported as Greenwich Mean Time, not local time, in accordance with<br />
the other monitors at CMDL Barrow. The sonic anemometer consistently showed an ambient<br />
temperature of 2 degrees higher than other ambient temperature instruments at CMDL. This<br />
indicates that one ore more of the heads was slightly out of line after shipping. This should not<br />
affect the measurements since the proportionality constant, β, is based on the heat flux, so it is the<br />
difference in temperature that matters. This is assuming, that there was no significant heat flux.<br />
Table 1. RGM mass raw data and accumulated concentrations corrected for blank values, 1130<br />
are automatic RGM concentration measurements from the NOAA TEKRAN speciation unit, for<br />
comparison to REA total as % difference, run 2 not included in compared avg. and std. deviation.<br />
Date time group RGM mass (pg) Concentration Blank. Corrected (pg/m3)<br />
Run Dt/time(Z) Down mid up down mid up Total 1130 % difference<br />
1 29 2200-30 0100 MAR 29,3 15,3 12,3 67,7 19,0 33,7 121 126 4<br />
2 30 1800-30 2200 MAR 28,2 353,9 24,7 44,6 310,6 46,7 402 58 (-593)<br />
3 02 2000-03 0000 APR 31,0 23,7 21,0 39,9 23,2 42,2 105 93 -13<br />
4 04 2015-05 0015 APR 11,8 22,9 9,4 17,4 22,5 15,6 56 65 14<br />
5 05 1839-06 0039 APR 31,0 56,4 27,2 33,8 32,7 31,7 98 448 78<br />
6 07 1850-08 0050 APR 61,4 92,6 38,6 57,5 58,0 46,2 162 99 -64<br />
7 08 2030-09 0030 APR 25,5 24,6 13,7 33,5 23,8 27,0 84 172 51<br />
8 09 1804-10 0104 APR 44,8 68,1 35,9 35,9 36,2 36,9 109 335 67<br />
9 10 1839-10 2339 APR 29,9 41,7 22,7 33,5 30,3 36,1 100 166 40<br />
10 11 2000-12 0000 APR 27,1 34,8 16,4 39,8 32,8 29,4 102 121 16<br />
12 12 2100-13 0000 APR 26,7 41,8 21,4 31,2 30,0 32,8 94 97 3<br />
AVERAGE 31,5 70,5 22,1 39,5 56,3 34,4 24<br />
Std. Dev. 12,47 96,72 9,26 13,49 84,99 8,97 42<br />
11 (night) 12 0800-12 1100 APR 4,80 6,70 2,2 6,4 6,4 4,5 17 48 65<br />
Table 2, page 75, shows other average data for the run, as recorded by the sonic<br />
anemometer. The clean air sector for NOAA, CMDL, Barrow, Alaska is defined as wind arriving
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 74<br />
from the coast, as opposed from the town of Barrow, and is 45 0 to 135 0 . The system was oriented to<br />
360 0 . The way the data was reported by the system was not sufficient for in depth analysis, but<br />
sufficient enough for the pilot measurements.<br />
In the new REA system, there are graphs correlating temperature, wind speed and direction<br />
with the turbulence. This is an important improvement since little can be done with average data for<br />
a run, since gusts for example, may carry much of the RGM mass from the coastline, while the<br />
prevailing winds are coming from another location. This will not be seen when simply taking<br />
averages into consideration. Due to the nature of micrometeorological measurements, the REA<br />
system works best at wind speeds near 5 m s -1 since there needs to be good turbulence to sample.<br />
Wind speeds less than 2 m s -1 are nominal. During the campaign, on average, the wind is coming<br />
outside of the CMDL defined clean air sector. This means that during the measurements, the wind<br />
was uncharacteristically coming from the town of Barrow. There are no known sources of RGM or<br />
elemental mercury in the town, so this should not have affected the measurements. The standard<br />
deviation in the vertical wind component is actually much higher than expected. It was expected<br />
that we would find 0.18, with little variability, given the stable terrain, and weather conditions, and<br />
instead found a campaign average value of 0.29 with a standard deviation of 0.11. The<br />
proportionality constant was also higher than the 0.3 expected, though lower than 0.6, as it should<br />
be, for a dynamic deadband. The campaign average was 0.41 with a standard deviation of 0.01.<br />
Indicating no significant variation in the heat flux. The machine reported all numbers to four<br />
decimals; results have been rounded to two.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 75<br />
Table 2. Average temperature, wind speed, wind direction, standard deviation of the vertical wind<br />
velocity and the proportionality constant based on heat flux as reported by the sonic anemometer<br />
result file runname.txt. Temperature was 2 0 higher than what other on site instruments reported.<br />
DAYHOURMON avg.temp avg.WS avg.Wdir In σv β<br />
Run Dt/time(Z) deg. C m/s deg Sector? average Average<br />
1 29 2200-30 0100 MAR -22,2 2,6 160 N 0,27 0,41<br />
2 30 1800-30 2200 MAR -22,6 5,5 132 Y 0,19 0,41<br />
3 02 2000-03 0000 APR -21,4 2,5 236 N 0,25 0,41<br />
4 04 2015-05 0015 APR -14,8 7,9 15 N 0,27 0,42<br />
5 05 1839-06 0039 APR -17,2 7,8 65 Y 0,26 0,41<br />
6 07 1850-08 0050 APR -9,3 5,9 93 Y 0,24 0,42<br />
7 08 2030-09 0030 APR -6,3 4,9 208 N 0,59 0,39<br />
8 09 1804-10 0104 APR -12,3 4,9 210 N 0,40 0,42<br />
9 10 1839-10 2339 APR -9,6 6,8 51 Y 0,27 0,41<br />
10 11 2000-12 0000 APR -8,8 5,2 41 N 0,18 0,42<br />
12 12 2100-13 0000 APR -8,5 3,3 247 N 0,25 0,41<br />
11<br />
0,11 0,42<br />
(night) 12 0800-12 1100 APR -8,7 2,7 36 N<br />
After correcting the mass, and taking the difference between the down and the up channel,<br />
then multiplying with the proportionality constant and the standard deviation in the vertical wind<br />
turbulence, the flux is calculated, as shown in Figure 14, page 77. The values for uncorrected mass<br />
are also shown. If the forcing was natural, then this assumes that the system was set up correctly,<br />
but that since, on average the wind came from the city, and hence flowed over the CMDL building<br />
prior to meeting the tower, that the wind flow was forced primarily downward. Except for the first<br />
measurement, the trends appear to be the same. Depositional velocity was found by dividing the<br />
flux with the sum of the concentrations in the denuders in the three channels. The depositional<br />
velocity for reactive gaseous mercury is approximately 1 cm s -1 for the mass corrected data and<br />
approximately 0.5 cm s -1 for the non-mass corrected data. Average depositional flux for Barrow<br />
was 1.3 ± 0.7 ng m -2 h -1 for the mass corrected and approximately half that for non-mass corrected<br />
values. For comparison purposes, Schroeder et al., 1998 used a dry depositional velocity of 0.5 cm s -<br />
1 when estimating for Alert, an average springtime dry-deposition flux for mercury of 2.5 ± 0.5 ng
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 76<br />
m -2 h -1 based on their measurements of TGM. Flux and depositional velocities are in Table 3, page<br />
76, and Figure 14., page 77.<br />
Table 3. Results of REA RGM vertical flux measurements, Barrow, Alaska, 2001; with computed<br />
dry depositional velocities for RGM. Runs 1 and 7 are excluded due to outlying depositional<br />
velocities, indicating a problem with micrometeorological measurements. Run 2 is excluded since<br />
the mid-channel froze open, and the mass balance could therefore not be corrected. 11 excluded<br />
from average, since it is a nighttime run.<br />
Vertical Flux (Fc) Vd<br />
Run Nr. Date time GMT (pg m^-2 s^-1) ng/m2/hr m s^-1 cm s^-1<br />
1 29 2200-30 0100 MAR -5,6 -20 -0,2 -15,7<br />
2 30 1800-30 2200 MAR 4,57 16,44 0,03 2,58<br />
3 02 2000-03 0000 APR -0,8 -2,8 0,0 -2,4<br />
4 04 2015-05 0015 APR -0,2 -0,6 0,0 -0,8<br />
5 05 1839-06 0039 APR -0,3 -0,9 0,0 -0,8<br />
6 07 1850-08 0050 APR -1,2 -4,3 0,0 -2,2<br />
7 08 2030-09 0030 APR -2,79 -10,05 -0,1 -10,06<br />
8 09 1804-10 0104 APR 0,2 0,7 0,0 0,6<br />
9 10 1839-10 2339 APR 0,1 0,4 0,0 0,4<br />
10 11 2000-12 0000 APR -1,0 -3,5 0,0 -2,8<br />
12 12 2100-13 0000 APR 0,2 0,6 0,0 0,6<br />
11 (night) 12 0800-12 1100 APR -0,08 -0,3 -0,01 -1,41<br />
Average Excl. 1,2,7,11 -0,4 -1,3 0,0 -0,9<br />
Std. Dev. Excl. 1,2,7,11 0,6 2,0 0,0 1,4
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 77<br />
Figure 14. Surface flux of RGM to the snow pack on a 3 m tower, at Barrow, Alaska, spring, 2001.<br />
RGM vertical flux (pg m-2 s-1) and<br />
Depositional Velocity of RGM cm/s<br />
1,5<br />
1,0<br />
0,5<br />
0,0<br />
-0,5<br />
-1,0<br />
-1,5<br />
-2,0<br />
-2,5<br />
-3,0<br />
-3,5<br />
02-apr<br />
04-apr<br />
RGM flux: BAMS 2001<br />
05-apr<br />
07-apr<br />
08-apr<br />
09-apr<br />
Date, average;<br />
error bars reflect 1 standard error<br />
10-apr<br />
12-apr<br />
Vertical Flux (Fc) (pg m^-2 s^-1)<br />
Depositional Velocity (Vd) cm s^-1<br />
Vertical flux without mass correction<br />
Depositional velocity without mass correction<br />
Average<br />
For the air surface exchange, the deposition is dominating but periods were observed with<br />
emission of RGM as well.<br />
4.3 High resolution dating of peat archives and mercury in peat<br />
Nuclear testing raised the levels of 14 C in the atmosphere, test ban treaties stopped this<br />
anthropogenic production of 14 C and levels began to fall. To take advantage of this knowledge as a
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 78<br />
dating tool, it was necessary to create a calibration curve valid for the northernmost northern<br />
hemisphere. The method relies on the fact that living moss material, later becoming peat, has taken<br />
up 14 C levels equal to the amount found in the air or similar archives during its growth season. This<br />
is the same principle as radiocarbon dating, except where classical radiocarbon dating employs the<br />
half-life of 14 C, the present method employs knowledge of the amount of 14 C present in the<br />
sample. Figure 15., page 79, shows the atmospheric bomb-pulse calibration curve, in percent<br />
modern carbon units, pMC, created by accumulating previously published and new terrestrial and<br />
atmospheric 14 C data for the period of interest from the northern most northern hemisphere, 30 o -90 o<br />
N latitude band. The inset figure shows the global input by the atmospheric nuclear weapons’ tests<br />
measured as TNT energy equivalent, and the corresponding uptake by the biosphere and oceans<br />
using an exponential decay time of 18.70 ± 0.15 yr (Levin and Hesshaimer 2000). The curve is<br />
valid from 1954 to the present. Near the top of the curve, 1963, the date has a larger uncertainty<br />
than other portions of the curve. The curve otherwise provides a date directly determined by the<br />
measured amount of 14 C in the sample to ± 2 years.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 79<br />
Figure 15. The atmospheric bomb pulse northernmost northern hemisphere calibration curve from Goodsite et al,<br />
2002, Appendix C.<br />
Peat cores are sliced in 1-centimetre slices. In each slice, a macrofossil of peat moss is removed<br />
and processed for determination of the level of 14 C, expressed as percent modern carbon, pMC, by<br />
accelerator mass spectrometry. As one goes deeper in the profile, 14 C levels rise to a peak of<br />
approximately 180 pMC. This level is where the 14 C bomb pulse peaked in 1963. Levels then begin<br />
to fall until the early 1950’s. There are a couple of features in the curve related to the temporary<br />
stop in testing. Figure 16., page 80, shows that peat profiles from Denmark and Greenland could<br />
reproduce the calibration curve without dampening. Dampening is when the top of the curve is<br />
found to be much lower than 180 pMC.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 80<br />
Figure 16. Samples from peat cores from Denmark and S. Greenland reproduce the bomb pulse curve well. From<br />
Goodsite et al., 2002, Appendix C.<br />
Atmospheric Hg accumulation rates in southern Greenland<br />
The dated profile can be analysed for trace elements or for paleo-ecological purposes and can<br />
be used to calculate an age-depth model to estimate peat accumulation rates. For example by using<br />
the dates determined by the bomb pulse dating method, from AD 1950 to ca. 1976, the<br />
accumulation rate was 0.68 cm yr -1 , and since ca. 1976 the rate has been 0.20 cm yr -1 .<br />
The age depth model allows the atmospheric Hg accumulation rate to be estimated as the<br />
product of the volumetric Hg concentrations, ng cm -3 , Figures 17 a and b, page 83, and the peat<br />
accumulation rate, cm yr -1 , when re-emission is not taken into account. Figure 18 a and b, page 84.<br />
Results for deeper portions of the profile, see Shotyk et al., 2003, Appendix C, show that pre-<br />
industrial Hg accumulation rate ranged from 0.3 to 3 µg m -2 yr -1 when clearly minerogenic<br />
enrichments are disregarded, such as seen at the bottom of the south Greenland profile at a depth of
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 81<br />
approximately 80 cm. This then would be an indication of an upper limit for natural flux values.<br />
Since this is a minerogenic peat, with geogenic input, this rate is expected to be higher than<br />
deposition due to atmospheric supply alone.<br />
From Figure 18a. page 84, it is seen that the accumulation rate in south Greenland reached its<br />
maximum in 1953 at 164 µg m -2 yr -1 , where it thereafter falls and begins to rise again in the 70’s<br />
with a fall in the late 80’s.<br />
The value in 1995: 14.1 µg m -2 yr -1 is in excellent agreement with the deposition predicted by<br />
the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model, DEHM: 12.0 µg m -2 yr -1 for South Greenland (Christensen<br />
et al., 2002, Skov et al., 2003 submitted).<br />
Present day values appear to be declining and are presently an order of magnitude higher than<br />
pre industrial values at the conservative limit, and a factor 3 to 4 at the positive limit.<br />
Atmospheric Hg accumulation rates in southern Denmark<br />
By using dates determined by the high resolution dating method (Goodsite et al., 2002,<br />
Appendix C) an average peat accumulation rate from AD 1950 to AD 1980 was 0.47 cm/y, and<br />
since AD 1980 was 0.21 cm/yr (Shotyk et al., 2003, accepted, Appendix C).<br />
Using these peat accumulation rates, the net atmospheric Hg accumulation rate was calculated<br />
in the same way as for south Greenland, by multiplying the volumetric concentration by the peat<br />
accumulation.<br />
In Figure 18b. page 84, it is seen that in Denmark the maximum Hg accumulation rate was also<br />
found in 1953, at 184 µg m -2 yr -1 . The overall trend in Denmark is the same as that seen in<br />
Greenland. For 1994 the deposition of 14 µg m -2 yr -1 is very comparable to the Danish Eulerian<br />
Hemisphere Model prediction of 18 µg m -2 yr -1 in 1995 (Christensen et al., 2002, Skov et al., 2003<br />
submitted, Appendix C).
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 82<br />
After coring, analysis showed that the Danish core had been disturbed by peat cutting from<br />
during WWII and prior, so it is difficult to conclusively interpret the profile. It is however evident<br />
that pre-industrial levels were much lower than post WWII levels. It is difficult to find a non-<br />
disturbed location in Denmark since surface signs are not always evident, and historical records of<br />
peat digging not always complete.<br />
In both cores, the error associated with the Hg accumulation is calculated to be 21%, based on<br />
conservative estimates of the errors associated with the 14 C bomb pulse curve age dates, ca. 5%; Hg<br />
concentrations, ca. 5%; and bulk density measurements, ca. 20%.<br />
One would expect the bulk density to increase rather smoothly with depth in the core as the<br />
peat becomes more humified and compacted under its own weight. However, in practice, bulk<br />
density determination now introduces the greatest source of error into accumulation determination<br />
as seen from the variation in the bulk density as shown in Figure’s 17 a and b, page 83, and the<br />
error calculation shown above.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 83<br />
Figure 17a and b. Mercury results from Southern Greenland and Denmark, from Shotyk et al., 2003, Appendix C.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 84<br />
Figure 18a Mercury accumulation rate for minerogenic peat from South Greenland. Accumulation rate as<br />
determined by the high-resolution bomb pulse dating (Goodsite et al., 2002, Appendix C) upper and<br />
lower limits depicted. Curve as submitted in Shotyk et al., 2003 (accepted), Appendix C<br />
Figure 18b Mercury accumulation rate from an ombrogenic peat profile from a raised bog in Denmark.<br />
Accumulation rate as determined by the high-resolution bomb pulse dating (Goodsite et al., 2002,<br />
Appendix C). Upper and lower limits depicted. Curve as submitted in Shotyk et al., 2003 (accepted),<br />
Appendix C.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 85<br />
Figure 19. Mercury in a peat profile from Myrarnar bog, Faroe Islands, Shotyk, Goodsite et al., unpublished<br />
preliminary results (manuscript in preparation). Coloured markers are used for discussion and<br />
notational purposes while manuscript is being prepared.<br />
Atmospheric Hg accumulation rates on the Faroe Islands<br />
Peat on the Faroe Islands was very decomposed and compact, already at the surface. Therefore,<br />
high-resolution dating was not possible, making the profile much more difficult to interpret and<br />
compare with the Danish and S. Greenland core. The large amount of minerogenic material made it<br />
possible however to use the lead-210 constant rate of supply model. Figure 19. page 85, shows the<br />
peak of mercury concentration to be in the 1954 layer, within reason and error, at the same time as<br />
the maximum in S. Greenland and Denmark. There are also discrete mercury enrichments in the<br />
profile that may be associated with volcanic ash fall. Figure 20., page 86, shows the mercury<br />
accumulation rate.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 86<br />
Figure 20. Preliminary mercury accumulation rate on the Faroe Islands. Unpublished data (manuscript in<br />
preparation by Shotyk, Goodsite et al). a. is the total profile, b looks in detail at the deeper<br />
depths. The arrows denote discrete ash layers, deposited from eruptions from nearby Icelandic<br />
volcanoes. c. is the uppermost 15 cm of the profile with the background value plotted for<br />
comparison purposes Dates determined by 210-Pb constant rate of supply model.<br />
The mercury accumulation rate cannot achieve the same detail, given the fact that a dating model is<br />
used and the peat is so compact and dense that a one-centimetre slice may represent 5 to 10 years of<br />
growth already towards the top of the profile. Never the less, the same trend is observed, with<br />
mercury accumulation peaking approximately 20 years ago, and since falling. The back ground<br />
accumulation rate of approximately 1 µg m -2 yr -1 is approximately the same as that found in<br />
southern Greenland and Denmark. The total loading, that is, the total amount of mercury considered<br />
with the number of years of sedimentation is not higher than the other two locations studied, though<br />
on initial inspection, one notes very high concentrations, and an accumulation rate over 30 times<br />
higher than background.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 87<br />
Total Hg ng/g (freeze dried weight)<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
Nordvestø Carey Islands, Greenland<br />
M.Goodsite/N. Rausch<br />
4520 BP 5065 BP 5414 BP 5940 BP<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 200 210<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
6205 BP<br />
Figure 21. Preliminary results for mercury for Nordvestø, Carey Islands, Greenland. The permafrost starts<br />
at 8 cm. Peat was sampled using a new rotary corer developed for frozen peat (Noernberg et<br />
al., 2003, Appendix C) Prelimary dating results show that the peat had a very linear<br />
accumulation, and that core represents approximately 1700 years of peat accumulation from<br />
the mid Holocene, with a 1 cm slice representing approximately 10 years of peat<br />
accumulation. Unpublished data.<br />
The mercury concentrations found in the peat profile from Nordvestø, Carey Islands, NW<br />
Greenland are shown in Figure 21., page 87. The study of peat from the Carey Islands is still<br />
ongoing at the time of completion of this Ph.D. The active layer extends to the depth of 8 cm. The<br />
core is just over 2 meters long and preliminary dates show that the core covers the mid-Holocene.<br />
The peat formed from moss that grew on bird droppings from seabirds that sat on the cliff, as<br />
evidenced by feathers found in each centimetre layer. The feathers have been sent to the Danish<br />
National Zoological Museum for species determination. There are very distinct discrete peaks in the<br />
core, for example between 120 and 130 cm deep. The concentration trend seems to be rising. The
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 88<br />
highest peak is found in the active layer, though chronologically dating this layer, which is exposed<br />
to freeze thaw cycles, cracking and physical transport is not realistic, since this sediment is very<br />
cracked and disturbed. The concentration value is however a factor three to four over what is seen<br />
in deeper layers. This must be assumed to be due to anthropogenic input. At the very first slice,<br />
where there was little green growth, the concentration was as low as values deeper in the core. This<br />
core is challenging to analyse, since the common trace metal used for comparison, lead, is found in<br />
values under the detection limit in the core. Analyses are being carried out for cadmium to help<br />
interpret the signal.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 89<br />
Discussion<br />
It is important to have reliable RGM concentrations because the RGM levels represent the<br />
amount of GEM oxidised and thereafter available for fast deposition from the Arctic troposphere<br />
during mercury depletion events, with resultant wash out to the marine environment once the snow<br />
melts. We are in need of reliable RGM observations in order to accurately measure flux, verify<br />
atmospheric models e.g. DEHM on both a temporal and spatial scale. Experimental data from this<br />
work confirms that whether deployed in the laboratory, or the Arctic, the annular denuder method is<br />
one that when deployed in accordance with Landis et al., 2002, reproducibly measures the<br />
operationally defined RGM with a 15% precision within 3 standard deviations.<br />
RGM annular denuder tests<br />
Annular denuders were tested under a variety of circumstances to determine how well the<br />
denuders could reproduce the same measurement and if they were subject to any passive uptake.<br />
The denuders are hand crafted, and are fragile, therefore the denuders are inspected and categorized<br />
prior to use.<br />
The RGM annular denuder tests performed in Oak Ridge at Station Nord taught many valuable<br />
lessons about the operational measurement of reactive gaseous mercury and have raised questions<br />
that should be addressed as this method improves.<br />
The primary lesson is that RGM measurements are not trivial. In fact they are difficult to<br />
perform. They require routine, and strict adherence to protocols to be able to compare them with<br />
other data. The blanking, analysis and zeroing of a single denuder takes approximately 1 hour.<br />
The results of this work show, that in the future, manual methods for measuring RGM should<br />
be performed using triplicate co-located denuder measurements, and the automatic RGM analyser<br />
should be deployed when a high-resolution time series is needed.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 90<br />
The annular denuders are subjected to numerous analytical steps to inspect, clean and coat<br />
them, expose them and afterwards analyse them. The physical principle of these denuders is so<br />
simple, that it should make them ideal for use. However, in practice they are so difficult to employ<br />
that of the measurements for GEM, particulate mercury and RGM; RGM is the one that scientists<br />
working with atmospheric mercury in the Arctic have least confidence in (Schroeder et al., 2003).<br />
Why is this? As shown in Figure 6., page 64, in general, parallel measurements in these<br />
experiments are reproducible within the 15% documented by Landis et al., 2002, except for the first<br />
measured replicate. In Lindberg et al., 2002, Appendix C., manual denuders were compared with<br />
the automated system and 5 of 6 replicates gave excellent results. However, a single outlier is<br />
enough to document the need for continued improvement. Especially since the only proper<br />
validation so far, is to make multiple replicate measurements, as there is at present no standard<br />
method of the calibrating the annular denuders prior to use. This is especially important since only<br />
two denuders are used as accumulators in the REA RGM system. In principle, if these two denuders<br />
cannot measure the same amount of RGM, then they will necessarily produce a measurement<br />
artefact that will result in an erroneous flux measurement. For example if the two denuders in the<br />
first parallel measurement shown in Figure 6., page 64, represented denuders that were hung on the<br />
up and down channel, then this would show as a significant difference in concentration, and thus a<br />
difference in flux. This single observation reinforces the need for a calibration system, especially if<br />
the system is to be deployed for further REA flux measurements.<br />
Figure 7., page 65 confirms that the physical geometry of the denuder sampling train as well as<br />
the fact that the parts are made out of quartz make the sampling train only negligibly exposed to<br />
passive uptake. Thus fulfilling a pre-requisite for using the annular denuders as RGM REA<br />
accumulators. With the passive uptake rate found for the observed total concentration, this means<br />
that over a typical 4 hour REA sampling period that the RGM due to passive uptake does not
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 91<br />
amount to more than the 10 to 15 % error from analysing the annular denuders, or the error in their<br />
reproducibility, and may therefore be used for RGM REA measurements.<br />
While at Station Nord, it was pointed out that the denuder sampling technique is very<br />
sensitive to the vapour pressure of the compound, especially compounds distributed between gas<br />
and particulate phase as demonstrated in studies of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) (e.g.<br />
Feilberg et al. 2000) experiments were therefore made to test the effect of measurements with and<br />
without heating in the Arctic, Figure 9., page 67.<br />
It seen that for higher RGM concentrations, there is an apparent difference, with heated<br />
denuders reporting more RGM. However the reason for this observation is not clear. The central<br />
question is if TPM is converted to RGM in the denuder or if the denuder is not functioning well at<br />
low temperatures, as described by Landis et al. (2002). At lower concentrations, 5 pg m -3 , heated<br />
and non heated denuders report approximately the same. This level may therefore be an expression<br />
of the detection limit of the KCl coated annular denuder, rather than true ambient values.<br />
This work confirms that the Landis et al., 2002 method not only is sensitive to differences in<br />
field application, but also is sensitive to differences in analytical application. For example, Landis et<br />
al., 2002 prescribes the use of co-axial fans in the analytical desorption train. Figure 10., page 68,<br />
shows that this is a consideration that will affect results, with higher values coming from systems<br />
that do not employ coaxial fans. How much cooling effect is needed from the fan? This is probably<br />
dependent on the type of sampling line used. Subjectively, the sampling lines in this experiment<br />
were warm to the touch, when co-axial fans were not used.<br />
The results from the tests confirm the recommendation made in Schroeder et al., 2003, for the<br />
need of a robust calibration system. The denuders were designed based on data from only HgCl2<br />
(Landis et al., 2002) and to date, there are no published methods for calibrating the annular<br />
denuders, though 2 research groups, Eric Prestbo and Julia Lu, report on calibrating the annular
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 92<br />
denuders by using HgCl2 generated in respectively either a permeation tube or a diffusion tube, as<br />
reported in Schroeder et al., 2003. For the present study, they were not “calibrated” they were<br />
coated and used if a low analytical blank value could be provided prior to exposure, and if there was<br />
no significant Hg (0) signature from the denuder, prior to starting the heating cycle.<br />
The question remains: when we sample RGM using annular denuders in the Arctic, what is it<br />
we are measuring?<br />
We can systematically look at what we know may create problematic measurements. As<br />
pointed out in Schroeder et al., 2003, the use of the inertial impactor in the front of the sampling<br />
chain means that only the gas phase and fine, aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 um or less, particulate<br />
matter are sampled past the active surface of the denuder, with the coarse particulate matter being<br />
impacted on the impact plate. It is not known how much mercury is lost in the inlet or on the<br />
impactor plate. In a heated denuder, it is possible that any mercury on particles on the impactor<br />
plate is degassed. For example, snow and ice crystals will melt in the temperatures in the heated<br />
denuder. The air as it travels through the denuder, becomes warmer and continues to expand. This<br />
might disturb the laminar flow, forcing the gas towards the KCl coated walls. This may actually<br />
improve the RGM trapping efficiency of the annual denuder, but at the same time, possibly induce<br />
measurement artefacts due to fine particle capture on the coated wall surface.<br />
When should denuders be recoated? Recoating of denuders is defined operationally as when<br />
blank values begin to rise, indicating that the surface cannot be “cleaned” well enough through<br />
pyrolization. What is it that is inactivating the surface in the Arctic? When should denuders be<br />
replaced? As long as denuders are providing a good seal, then they are most likely fine for<br />
continued use. In this work, denuders approximately one year old were still functioning well.<br />
With respect to breakthrough under Arctic conditions, Landis et al., 2002 showed that for<br />
automatic sampling up to 2 hours, there was no breakthrough. When sampling over two hours,
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 93<br />
unless two denuders are used in series, then one will simply not know if there was breakthrough or<br />
not.<br />
Are the denuders appropriate to be used as the sampling end in the REA flux machine? The<br />
tests from the denuders suggest that they are suitable to use as accumulators for the REA flux<br />
machine, in the Arctic, as long as the denuders are used under the same flow and heated conditions,<br />
since with the flux measurements, it is the difference in concentration that is needed.<br />
The RGM levels, should be higher than ambient background levels, for successful flux<br />
determination, otherwise a trustworthy difference between the denuder used in the up channel and<br />
the denuder used in the down channel may not be found.<br />
The denuder test results suggest that concentration measurements should be made in at least<br />
triplicate. In fact this is generally the case for REA denuder based sampling systems (e.g., Zhu et<br />
al., 2000) which employ at least three denuders for each of the up and down channel, then use the<br />
difference in concentration as the difference between the average concentration between the two<br />
channels. This approach was not possible for this pilot work, given the number of sampling systems<br />
available. However, the parallel and quadruplicate measurements suggested that a single annular<br />
denuder could reliably accumulate RGM in a REA system deployed in the Arctic, without being<br />
subject to significant passive uptake of RGM, when idle.<br />
Could other RGM accumulators have been used? Three methods aside from annular denuders<br />
have been developed for measurement of RGM: refluxing mist chambers, ion-exchange membranes<br />
behind particulate filters and potassium chloride, KCl, coated tubular denuders (Landis et al., 2002<br />
and citations therein). Of the four RGM measurement methods, only the annular denuder method by<br />
Landis et al., had the necessary characteristics of being able to operate under arctic conditions, with<br />
the flow dynamics essential for the REA flux measurements in this work. The annular denuder has<br />
the ability to quickly develop laminar flow, i.e. flow with a Reynolds number, Re, under 2000. This
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 94<br />
is maintained even though the flow is started and stopped at a certain frequency in response to up or<br />
down drafts. Under constant, steady state flow conditions, developed within 0.1 second for the<br />
denuder, the Reynolds number falls to less than 400 (Landis et al. 2002). The Reynolds number for<br />
an annular denuders’ geometry is defined as: Re = 4Q/((γπ)d1+d2) where Q is the flow rate, γ is the<br />
kinematic viscosity of air and d1 and d2 are the internal and external diameters of the annulus.<br />
This feature is especially important compared with tubular denuders since as can be derived<br />
from the modified Gormley Kennedy equation (Gormley and Kennedy, 1949), discussed below, the<br />
annular denuders allow a high flow rate and increase the collection efficiency per unit length by a<br />
factor of 30 (Possanzini et al., 1983).<br />
Denuders, also known as diffusion denuders, collect gases based on the diffusion properties of<br />
gases, as compared to particles. The separation of gas and particulate sampling is important so that<br />
appropriate masses, and thereafter concentrations may be determined. It is especially important to<br />
this work, when measured concentration differences in two collocated denuders are used as the<br />
basis for flux determination. As laminar air is pulled through a tube, in the case of an annular<br />
denuder, there is a concentric tube inside the outer tube, providing extra surface area, and the air is<br />
pulled through the 1 mm “annular” space between the two tubes, the “annulus”. Gases diffuse<br />
towards the walls of the tubes, due to their relatively high diffusivity, while the high inertia of<br />
particles will cause them to continue travelling through the tube (e.g., Hering et al., 1988). The<br />
inside of the tubes are coated with a substance that causes the gas to “stick” to the walls, and the<br />
gases are removed from the flow stream. In this case, the coating substance is potassium chloride,<br />
KCl, and the adsorbed species is reactive gaseous mercury, HgXY.<br />
The relative removal of the gas is a function of distance, x, travelled through the tube, and is<br />
given by modifying the Gormley-Kennedy equation for tubular denuders (Gormley and Kennedy,<br />
1949) to the geometry of the annular denuder (Allegrini et al., 1987):
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 95<br />
Cx/Co = 0.82 exp ( - 22.53 (πDL/4Q)(d1+d2/d2-d1) (1)<br />
As seen from the equation, it is valid for collection efficiencies of 100% where the value of the<br />
mass concentration of the gas at a distance, Cx, over the mass concentration of the gas at the<br />
entrance, Co is less than 0.82. D is the diffusion coefficient of the gas in the air, and Q is the<br />
volumetric flow rate, d1 and d2 are the internal and external diameters of the annulus. Important<br />
assumptions for the above therefore are: 1., laminar flow must be obtained in the tube; 2., all the<br />
molecules reaching the wall must be trapped and should not diffuse chromatographically further<br />
into the tube; 3., The capacity of the trapping medium limits collection time, since eventually the<br />
active surface will become saturated and the gases will no longer be trapped on the wall, being<br />
carried through the denuder instead. This is what is known as breakthrough (Bemgård et al., 1996).<br />
These conditions must be satisfied for annular denuders to work as the RGM reservoir for the REA<br />
sampling system.<br />
Considering the results from the denuder tests, with the previously mentioned considerations<br />
and uncertainties, when sampling at 1 Hz, the above requirements are met. The denuders were<br />
simply not able to sample RGM at a sampling flow rate of 10 Hz. To do so, their geometry would<br />
need to be redesigned in accordance with the Gormley Kennedy equation. This would mean that<br />
they would need to be shorter and thicker. This would limit the development of laminar flow and is<br />
not rudimentary redesign work.<br />
One of the ideas for the future could then be to indirectly measure RGM using KCl coated<br />
beads in a quartz denuder tube, of the same dimension of the annular denuders in Landis et al., 2002<br />
and thereby facilitating, using the same analytical sampling chain and heating caps. This system<br />
would collect TPM + RGM. TPM could be measured alone with a co-located TPM collector and<br />
subtracted from the RGM+TPM, giving an indirect measurement of RGM. A TPM sampler could<br />
also be modified to collect RGM. This would take advantage of there being greater confidence in
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 96<br />
PM measurements than RGM measurements in Arctic atmospheric mercury studies (Schroeder et<br />
al., 2003) though might introduce greater experimental error. The effect on flow from heating the<br />
denuders should be studied in greater detail.<br />
Ozone and gaseous elemental mercury measurements<br />
The net exchange rate of mercury to and from the snow surface in the Arctic is a result of many<br />
physical and chemical processes. This work confirms previous observations that the results vary<br />
seasonally and diurnally, with depositional events occurring perennially across the Arctic and that<br />
there is an apparent accumulation of mercury in the Arctic, as evidenced by the measurements in<br />
peat.<br />
Schroeder et al. (1998) described the first AMDEs, observed at the Canadian military station,<br />
Alert since 1995. They showed that ozone and GEM are simultaneously depleted and that they are<br />
highly correlated during AMDEs. Data in Figure 11., page 69, confirms this as well for Station<br />
Nord for the years of 2000, 2001 and 2002. If it is assumed that Hg was depleted when ozone was<br />
destroyed, then it can be inferred from the ozone data from Station Nord, that mercury depletions<br />
occurred there since 1998, and probably prior to that as well.<br />
After the depletion period, very high concentrations of GEM appeared with values up to 4.5 ng<br />
m -3 appearing in 2002 (off the scale in Figure 11., page 69). This must be due to reemission of<br />
mercury from the snow surface to the atmosphere. The measurements at Station Nord are in<br />
agreement with what was seen in Barrow (Lindberg et al. 2002, Appendix C), though the value of<br />
4.5 ng m -3 (+) is higher than seen in 2000 and 2001, and more than triple that of normal ambient<br />
levels, once elemental mercury finds its equilibrium in the late summer atmosphere, at Station<br />
Nord. What is happening to this mercury? This is a question that still cannot be satisfactorily<br />
answered and is the subject of future research.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 97<br />
That ozone and GEM are directly dependent on one another, or on a mutual factor, can be seen<br />
in Figure 12., page 70, where R 2 = 0.8 this is comparable with what is found at the other Arctic<br />
stations. given the strong correlation between ozone and GEM, observed at Station Nord during<br />
AMDE’s. A direct reaction between ozone and GEM can be excluded due to the approximately 1<br />
year lifetime of GEM with respect to the present ozone concentrations (Lin and Pekonen 1999).<br />
However, a speculatively plausible reaction mechanism can be reasoned from what is presently<br />
known.<br />
A plausible mechanism for the oxidation of elemental mercury to divalent gaseous mercury<br />
after polar sunrise in the Arctic<br />
Bottenheim (personal communication) showed that Bromine builds up due to the “bromine<br />
explosion” mechanism ((3) – (6)):<br />
O Br ⎯⎯→O<br />
+ BrO<br />
3 + 2<br />
(3)<br />
BrO +<br />
+ BrO ⎯⎯→<br />
2Br O2<br />
(4)<br />
BrO + HO2<br />
⎯⎯→<br />
HOBr<br />
(5)<br />
−<br />
Br + HOBr ⎯⎯→<br />
2Br<br />
therefore either Br or BrO is a candidate for GEM removal is. An analogue mechanism may occur<br />
with Cl, however Cl and ClO cannot initially be ruled out, as significant Cl removal of organic<br />
compounds have been observed during AMDE (e.g. Boudries and Bottenheim, 2000). Taking<br />
thermodynamics into consideration however, shows that the reaction: Hg (O) with Cl and radical<br />
ClO are less likely to occur than with Br and radical BrO.<br />
The lifetime of GEM is observed to be typically about 10 hours during AMDE as confirmed<br />
also by this data from Station Nord. Hausmann and Platt observed up to 20 pptv of ClO and BrO<br />
(6)
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 98<br />
and thus the resulting rate constants for the reactions can be estimated to be in the order of 6x10 -14<br />
cm 3 molec -1 sec -1 .<br />
Skov et al., 2003, Appendix C, analysed the data using a relative rate study, and found direct<br />
evidence in a strong linear correlation (>99.9% significance) that ozone and GEM have a mutual<br />
dependence that cannot be explained solely by meteorology.<br />
Goodsite et al., 2003, Appendix C, propose a plausible mechanism for the oxidation of gaseous<br />
Hg (0) to the divalent gaseous form. The mechanism is modeled from the limited data known of Br<br />
and Hg reactions in the Arctic, given the data from Station Nord, with a predicted lifetime of Hg to<br />
be approximately 10 hours during AMDEs.<br />
The mechanism is consistent with the kinetics, thermodynamics and field observations, but the<br />
final end product is still not definitively known, due to the measurement method in the field, i.e.,<br />
reactive gaseous mercury is operationally determined and defined.<br />
The hypothesized mechanism is not the same as the mechanisms otherwise derived (e.g.<br />
Lindberg et al., 2002, Appendix C), where the depletion of atmospheric boundary-layer mercury is<br />
said to be due to a reaction between gaseous elemental mercury, GEM, and BrO free radicals or<br />
mechanisms resulting in the product HgCl2.<br />
The proposed reaction mechanism is that gaseous elemental mercury, Hg (0) combines with Br<br />
atoms, called X, coming from the polar sunrise destruction of ozone, in a reversible reaction,<br />
forming the energised HgBr*.<br />
Through a third body reaction, M, where M is N2 or O2, the HgBr radical is formed.<br />
The HgBr radical can live long enough at the low temperatures of the Arctic to combine with<br />
O2 forming the HgBrOO peroxy radical or can combine with Br forming HgBr2.<br />
It is not likely to react with Cl, since this reaction would be endothermic.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 99<br />
Similarly, the product cannot be Hg2Br2 since this would imply a tri-molecular reaction, which<br />
statistically is highly unlikely to occur in the atmosphere due to the very low concentrations of<br />
elemental mercury and bromine atoms. The combination of Hg and Nr atoms and the dimerization<br />
of HgBr is discussed in Grieg et al., (1970).<br />
Nor would the product be HgO, since this formation is similarly thermodynamically not<br />
favourable.<br />
The final product is the divalent gaseous mercury unknown, HgXY, proposed to be HgBr2.<br />
By modelling the reaction of Hg and Br in the atmosphere, with current rate constant data, and<br />
BrO measurements, i.e., assuming 20 ppt BrO and 2 ppt Br in the atmosphere during a depletion<br />
event, it is calculated that the lifetime of Hg is 4.6 hrs against forming HgBr,<br />
The lifetime of HgBr is 0.35 hrs. against forming HgBr2; comparing with the lifetime of HgBr<br />
of 0.75 hrs, means that 68% of the time HgBr will form HgBr2.<br />
Thus the overall lifetime of removal of Hg to HgBr2 is 4.6 hrs. / .68 = 6.7 hrs. This is in good<br />
agreement with the observed 10 hr lifetime of Hg under depletion, and therefore the above reaction<br />
mechanism is plausible as one of the limiting reactions for the oxidation of elemental mercury to<br />
reactive gaseous mercury in the post polar sunrise atmosphere, though it is realized that given the<br />
dynamics of atmospheric chemistry, that the above scheme is based on a simple model with limited<br />
laboratory kinetics data to carry out the calculations and that HgBr may also be reacting with O2 or<br />
many other elements or compounds in the Arctic atmosphere.<br />
RGM concentration measurements<br />
RGM measurements performed in parallel at Station Nord in 2002 show that the concentration<br />
varies from between values below detection limit and up to 75 ng/m 3 , Figure 13., page 71. These<br />
values are comparable to those found at Barrow before the start of AMDE’s and are comparable to<br />
levels measured in the Dr. Lindbergs’ laboratory in Oak Ridge. These values were measured prior
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 100<br />
to the start of a depletion event, as we had to leave the station prior to when a pronounced AMDE<br />
occurred. The concentrations are an order of magnitude lower than RGM maximums measured in<br />
Barrow in 2001 (Lindberg et al., 2002, Appendix C).<br />
Barrow and Station Nord are however, difficult to compare since at Station Nord, the prevailing<br />
winds are katabatic, bringing cold, dense air from the inland ice towards the coast. This means that<br />
many of the conditions observed at the other Arctic stations, with prevailing winds from the coast,<br />
are not observed at Nord. This also implies that the typical air mass at Station Nord is thinned with<br />
relatively clean air.<br />
RGM flux measurements in Barrow<br />
Table 1 has the mass, and corresponding concentration for the measurement periods, as well as<br />
the corrected mass and concentration and a comparison of concentration between the total found in<br />
the three annular denuders with the measured concentration with the TEKRAN automatic speciation<br />
unit, MODEL 1130. It was necessary to correct the mass and concentration to have conservation of<br />
mass. A properly set up micrometeorological system will automatically produce a time series,<br />
sampling turbulence such that mass is conserved. As seen in the non-corrected data from the<br />
Barrow campaign, this was not the case. Due to limited space on the 10m tower at CMDL, Barrow,<br />
it was necessary to deploy the REA RGM system on a tower guy-wire support pole.<br />
The sonic anemometer was set up on a pipe that was bought in Barrow, and whose outer<br />
diameter did not snugly fit the METEK sonic. While every effort was made to create a stable<br />
platform for the sonic, it was evident after the first three measurements that the sonic was<br />
preferentially sampling the down channel. This meant that either the sonic was not totally level, or<br />
that the air was being forced downward, by the CMDL station. Given the position of the sonic, in<br />
relation to the station, and the unorthodox method of setting up the sonic, it was determined that it<br />
was most likely the sonic that was not properly aligned. During the first two sampling runs, the
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 101<br />
sampling valves froze, and their data is not further considered. It was therefore necessary to<br />
reposition the sampling valves, into a shipping box, buried in the snow for insulation. The third run<br />
also showed sampling which favoured the down channel. One expects a micrometeorological<br />
system to equally sample turbulence, as seen by similar number of counts in the up and down<br />
channel. One channel being preferred over another is a sign that either the wind flow is being forced<br />
in one direction of another, or that the instrumentation is not properly set up. Even though the<br />
results indicated preferential sampling, the decision was made not to adjust the sonic. It was not<br />
certain that any adjustments would make the system any more level, and the first three<br />
measurements were consistent, so mass adjustments could be reasonably applied. Stopping the<br />
system each hour to read the data caused the tilt function to reset. This could also be a source of<br />
bias. In the new generation system, it is no longer necessary to stop the system to monitor and<br />
download the data.<br />
The total concentration is taken to be the sum of the up, down and mid masses multiplied by<br />
total sampling time and the flow rate. The concentrations compare sometimes very well with the<br />
RGM monitor, and other times not as well. There does not seem to be any general trend, except that<br />
the REA system total is generally less RGM than the 1130 concentration, Figure 22., page 102.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 102<br />
RGM pg m-3<br />
500<br />
450<br />
run nr. 2, valve stuck open in REA<br />
system<br />
400<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
Comparison of total RGM concentrations, Barrow 2001<br />
1130 total<br />
RGM REA total<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 11(dark)<br />
REA flux run number<br />
Figure 22 A comparison of RGM air concentrations between the REA system and a co-located TEKRAN model<br />
1130 mercury speciation unit. Due to the different heating mantles, it is expected that the REA<br />
system will have lower RGM values, since the annular denuders were only heated to 50 0 C above<br />
ambient. and did so in all but 2 cases, excluding run nr. 2. The average percent difference between<br />
the two measurements is 24% with a standard deviation of 42, excluding run nr. 2. RGM<br />
measurements from S. Brooks TEKRAN 1130, this author used a linear relationship between time<br />
and concentration for the 2537A since the run start times for the two instruments were different.<br />
The flux was divided by the total concentration to determine the depositional velocity. Table 2.<br />
page 75, has the average values reported in the REA system data output file runname.txt. It is seen<br />
that for the measurement periods, the average temperature was rising, during the campaign, while<br />
wind speed was on average, generally consistent. Wind direction was more variable coming from<br />
the direction of Barrow most of the time, instead of the coast. The standard deviation of the vertical<br />
wind velocity and the value for the proportionality constant, are on average, stable, as should be<br />
expected for the weather conditions.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 103<br />
The REA pilot system was designed and built prior to deployment with the best intentions in<br />
mind. The system did what it was built to do, reporting what it was designed to report. There were<br />
several areas that were found to need improvement and these improvements were incorporated into<br />
the NOAA REA system, built for use in Station Nord. In the system used in Barrow, in the<br />
runname.txt file, channel count data did not equal sampling time, when multiplied by the sampling<br />
frequency. The count data did, in the raw data file, runname.acu. The fact that the data was reported<br />
as a sampling average provided limited data available for analysis. Average wind direction, while<br />
nice to know, is not the same as saying the prevailing wind direction when mass was sampled over<br />
the up and down channels, or even better, breaking up the mass in terms of a wind rose. This is<br />
now possible with the new REA system. Since the system needed to be shut down for data analysis,<br />
back-up and recovery, the self-learning function of the sonic was effectively reset each time the<br />
system was restarted, having to re-learn the terrain at the start of each sampling period. For this type<br />
of system, the sonic should be left running. This has been remedied with the new system.<br />
Figure 14. page 77, shows the flux and depositional velocity for the Barrow campaign. Mass<br />
non-corrected values are shown for informational purposes only. Comparing the flux with the<br />
average meteorological conditions in Table 2., page 75, shows no direct correlation. One would<br />
expect that emissions would increase as a function of the rising temperatures, but this can not said<br />
to be readily apparent. What seems to be apparent is that following a large depositional event; there<br />
is a small re-emission. This is probably the snow pack regaining equilibrium with the atmosphere.<br />
Over the course of the campaign, there is an average deposition; this however is for just one Arctic<br />
location, during a very short period of time. A much longer time series, spanning the 4 seasons is<br />
required to know more about annual trends and to parameterize models.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 104<br />
Depositional velocity and surface resistance for RGM in Barrow<br />
Numerical depositional models require the surface resistance and depositional velocity for<br />
proper model parameterization. Zannetti, 1990, defines an operational definition of dry deposition<br />
velocity as:<br />
1<br />
Vd =<br />
ra + rm + rs<br />
(7)<br />
Where ra is the aerodynamic resistance, depending on the atmospheric turbulent transfer, rm is<br />
the molecular resistance in the atmospheric viscous sub-layer and rs is the surface resistance of the<br />
snow, which depends on the flux into the snow layer.<br />
Zannetti defines the flux operationally as:<br />
F ( z = 0,<br />
t)<br />
= Vd(<br />
z1)<br />
Cg(<br />
z1,<br />
t)<br />
(8)<br />
Where the flux to the surface, when F is negative, or from the surface, when F is positive, at a<br />
reference height z1 as the depositional velocity found at the reference height multiplied by the<br />
concentration of the trace gas found at the reference height. In this study, we experimentally<br />
determine the flux, and the concentration and use this data to solve for depositional velocity; where<br />
our reference height in Barrow is 3 m above the snow pack.<br />
Substituting (7) into (8) and solving for a surface resistance, which can then be modeled, rs<br />
(modeled):<br />
Cg(<br />
z1,<br />
t)<br />
rs(mod eled)<br />
=<br />
− ra − rm<br />
(9)<br />
F(<br />
z = 0,<br />
t)<br />
If ra and rm are taken to be small in relation to the first term, then it can be seen that surface<br />
resistance is the inverse of the depositional velocity. The modeled surface resistance is a necessary<br />
parameterization term for depositional modeling, see Skov et al., 2003, Appendix C, and for this<br />
study, as seen by taking the inverse of the depositional velocities shown in Figure 14., page 77, it is<br />
found to be on average 1 cm -1 s.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 105<br />
A more exact determination of the surface resistance was not possible with the available output<br />
data from the pilot REA system. However, the new NOAA system produces the necessary output<br />
factors to allow modeled calculation of ra and rm in accordance with the Karlsson and Nyholm dry<br />
deposition and desorption model (Karlsson and Nyholm, 1998); i.e., friction velocity, Obukov’s<br />
length and the stratification function as long as a diffusion coefficient for RGM is known. Therefore<br />
campaigns with the new system will provide a better approximation of depositional velocity and<br />
surface resistance.<br />
As seen in Figure 14., page 77, the depositional velocities noted for depositional events are<br />
fast, around 2 cm s -1 this is what would be expected for a very reactive gaseous species such as<br />
HNO3. On average, the depositional velocity is approximately 1 cm s -1 . Comparing with measured<br />
dry deposition velocities over snow for HNO3, reviewed in Karlson and Nyholm, 1998, show that<br />
the measured dry depositional velocities for RGM may be an order of magnitude higher than that<br />
for HNO3, given the snow surface temperature of < 2 0 C. However, there are also reported values<br />
that fall within the range found for RGM in this study. For example, Cress et al.,1995, as cited in<br />
Karlsson and Nyholm, found the depositional velocity about 0 0 C to be in the range of 0.88-3.79,<br />
though the air concentration is not given. It is seen that as ambient concentrations of HNO3<br />
decreased, depositional velocities apparently increased: for a concentration in the air of 6-15 µg m -3<br />
Johansson and Granath, 1986, find a depositional velocity for air temperatures < -2 0 C of HNO3 to<br />
be 0.02 – 0.1 cm s -1 ; near 0 0 C the deposition velocity increases, to 0.6 cm s -1 . Cadle et al., 1985,<br />
as cited in Karlsson and Nyholm, report a depositional velocity averaged for all temperatures, with<br />
an air concentration of 6 µg m -3 to be 1.4 cm s -1 .<br />
Comparing the depositional velocities found in this study with the experimental data reported<br />
for HNO3 shows that while the expected values could have been an order of magnitude lower, the
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 106<br />
values found are within reported ranges for a comparatively highly reactive gaseous species.<br />
Though RGM Vd may be better compared with NO2 Vd over snow.<br />
Karlsson and Nyholm note that at temperatures under –2 0 C the depositional velocity appears to<br />
be controlled by the surface resistance. The surface resistance decreases as the temperature warms<br />
due to increasing amounts of available water. Measurements with this system need to be made<br />
around 0 0 C to see if this is also the case for RGM.<br />
Slinn et. al., 1978, show that if dry deposition is the only removal mechanism for a substance<br />
not affected by chemical transformation, that the atmospheric residence time for the substance can<br />
be estimated as the deposition velocity multiplied by the height. If it assumed that Hg, once<br />
converted within the MBL is deposited almost as quickly as converted, as shown by the averaged<br />
measured depositional velocity of 1 cm s -1 then RGM would have a lifetime in Nord of around 10<br />
hrs. This would correspond to an MBL height of 360 m which is reasonable. One sees from the<br />
above relationship, that as the height of the MBL decreases, the atmospheric residence time will<br />
exponentially decrease. The measured values may reflect upper limits of surface resistance over the<br />
snow.<br />
Comparison of RGM flux with RGM ambient concentrations<br />
Figure 23., page 107, are the monitored results provided by NOAA, for RGM concentrations<br />
during the Barrow 2001 flux measurement campaign. Comparing with Figure 14., page 77, or the<br />
values in Table 3., page 76, show that when there is a deposition recorded by the REA machine,<br />
there are correspondingly low RGM ambient values. The air has been apparently depleted of RGM<br />
due to deposition. Trends of RGM rising in the air on the 8 th , 9 th and 12 th of April are recorded by<br />
the REA system as reemission, perhaps indicating that RGM can be re-volatized from the snow<br />
surface.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 107<br />
RGM pg m-3<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
03-26<br />
00:00<br />
03-28<br />
00:00<br />
03-30<br />
00:00<br />
Automatic RGM measurements, Barrow 2001<br />
04-01<br />
00:00<br />
04-03<br />
00:00<br />
04-05<br />
00:00<br />
Date and time<br />
04-07<br />
00:00<br />
04-09<br />
00:00<br />
04-11<br />
00:00<br />
04-13<br />
00:00<br />
04-15<br />
00:00<br />
Figure 23. Automatic RGM measurements, Barrow Arctic mercury study, BAMS 2001, courtesy of<br />
Steve Brooks.<br />
The RGM REA system is providing results in accordance with what is known about RGM.<br />
RGM appears to have been deposited, when post mercury depletion event levels are low, and<br />
reemitted, when RGM ambient concentration levels are high. The exact processes need to studied in<br />
greater detail and a data set from a longer period is needed to make judgments about trends in the<br />
Arctic.<br />
Deciding how to make the flux measurements<br />
There are two types of deposition: dry deposition, a continuous process for gaseous species and<br />
particles, generally dominating in the arid high Arctic and wet deposition, gas in dissolved form in<br />
fog or precipitation, occurring periodically, and relatively infrequently in the high Arctic due to its<br />
arid climate.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 108<br />
Gaseous elemental mercury is approximately 95% of the total gaseous mercury in the<br />
atmosphere, TGM, (Schroeder and Munthe, 1998). Much of the GEM is oxidised RGM (e.g.<br />
Schroeder et al., 1998, Lindberg et al., 2002) during an AMDE. Thus RGM is likely subject to<br />
subsequent fast dry deposition to the Arctic snow surface during an AMDE (Schroeder et al., 1998).<br />
Therefore this work developed a method to quantify the deposition during an AMDE, so that the<br />
data could be used for further flux measurement development and model calibration and<br />
verification.<br />
Given the challenges encountered with the micrometeorological system, it is worth reviewing<br />
options considered for measuring RGM flux. Flux measurements could be as “simple” as setting a<br />
small environmental chamber over the snow surface, however this would give limited information<br />
as to the pattern and exclude natural processes and deposition. A chamber is not able to fully<br />
measure representative exchange rates, and there has not been a chamber method developed yet, for<br />
the flux of reactive gaseous mercury in the Arctic. Development of a chamber method for RGM is<br />
hindered by the need to have a warm KCl coating, if KCl is used as the active surface for RGM.<br />
This heating will liquefy the snow surface.<br />
The work instead chose a micrometeorological method, REA.<br />
REA has been used for the determination of elemental mercury flux (Cobos et al., 2002). REA<br />
allows for a covering a relatively large area, known as the fetch, i.e., the fetch is approximately =<br />
100 x height of system; in this case 300 m; since the system was set up 3 m above the snow pack<br />
surface.<br />
However, as discussed below, there are also drawbacks with using REA to investigate mercury<br />
depletion events in the Arctic, particularly that weather conditions favourable for the system, i.e.,<br />
high turbulence, are not favourable for mercury depletion events to occur, and are the exception to<br />
stable weather normally encountered on a flat Arctic coastal plane.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 109<br />
REA measurements rely on the transport of mass near the surface of the Earth where<br />
turbulence in the air is the main transport and mixing mechanism that eventually causes deposition.<br />
Fluid dynamics show that at any rough boundary, the friction causes velocity of a fluid (e.g. air) to<br />
go to zero. As this occurs, the air velocity vectors straighten out and are laminar in a plane a few<br />
millimeters thick over the Earth. Once gas molecules get into this plane they will either diffuse<br />
towards the surface, or evade towards the atmosphere, depending on the concentration gradient<br />
between this layer, known as the quasi-laminar boundary layer. Under higher turbulent conditions,<br />
the amount of mass transported greatly exceeds the amount of mass diffused, and generally<br />
turbulent transport is the most important physical method for deposition. A REA system samples<br />
this mass, as it is transported up from emission, or deposited. A valid flux determination relies on<br />
the principle that the mass of the trace gas measured, in this case RGM, is unique to that air mass.<br />
This means that it wasn’t produced or destroyed in the air mass.<br />
From the GEM concentration results from the Station Nord campaign, it can however be seen<br />
in the high Arctic, that under stable weather conditions that gaseous diffusion may be important.<br />
This is an area requiring further investigation in the future.<br />
Shear stress from surface friction is one of the main driving forces of turbulence; the other<br />
driving force is the change in buoyancy with the change in air temperature and thus density with<br />
height. This force may be important over the Arctic snow surface, however the cold surface cause<br />
stable cold air, that is difficult to move, and results in calm conditions, with wind speed under 2 m<br />
per second, as witnessed at Station Nord in 2002.<br />
These stable weather conditions are the greatest draw back to deploying the RGM system in the<br />
Arctic for investigating mercury depletion events. Lu et al., 2001, summarize that the environmental<br />
conditions favouring mercury depletion events at high latitudes are: 1, marine/maritime location; 2,<br />
calm weather, low wind speeds, non-turbulent air flow; 3, the existence of a temperature inversion;
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 110<br />
4, sunlight and 5, sub-zero temperatures. Conditions 2 and 3 unfortunately imply poor operational<br />
characteristics for micrometeorological systems.<br />
The most important requirement however, for a micrometeorological flux system is a surface<br />
that isolates the vertical fluxes, by being able to neglect horizontal exchanges. This is a “flat”<br />
horizontally homogenous surface. The coast of the Arctic at Barrow and Station Nord are very good<br />
in fulfilling this criterion.<br />
Micrometeorological methods also make the assumption that the surface exchange flux is equal<br />
to the vertical turbulent flux at any height above the surface, as long as one remains inside the<br />
inertial sublayer. The inertial sublayer is the layer above the roughness sublayer, closest to the<br />
surface, and is the bottom tenth of the planetary boundary layer, PBL, generally known as the<br />
surface layer, SL. This is an application of conservation of mass.<br />
The PBL grows in height during the day, expanding as the air warms, and contracts at night as<br />
the air cools. The PBL is generally very stable in the Arctic and is the region of atmosphere closest<br />
to earth where direct effects from the planet no longer affect the physical properties of air. The<br />
marine boundary layer, MBL, is the layer between which air masses from the land and sea<br />
converge. It moves towards and from the land, as well as in height both on diurnal and seasonal<br />
patterns just as the PBL. In this study, we were within kilometres of the shoreline in either Nord, or<br />
Alaska, and therefore, for all intensive purposes, always within the Arctic MBL. This is important<br />
as a source of halogens driving the oxidation previously discussed.<br />
The system chosen and used, the REA RGM flux system with KCl coated annular denuders as<br />
accumulators gave the possibility for good flux measurements, which would provide necessary data<br />
for transport and depositional model parameterization. The flux system could take advantage of<br />
already developed methods, to accumulate the RGM. Since the deployment of this system, REA<br />
was successfully applied to measure gaseous elemental mercury flux (Cobos et al., 2002).
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 111<br />
Global, Arctic and atmospheric implications<br />
Reactive gaseous mercury is the operationally defined product of the post polar sunrise<br />
oxidation of elemental mercury in Arctic areas as shown at two trans-Arctic locations, Station Nord<br />
and Barrow. This work shows that in accordance with what would be expected for a reactive<br />
gaseous species, that it is quickly deposited to the snow surface, though there are also measured<br />
emissions, implying that there are processes in the snow surface capable of releasing RGM, or re-<br />
emitting the deposited RGM. On average, the mercury was deposited to the snow pack for the short<br />
spring measurement period. There was little RGM at night; supporting that RGM production in the<br />
Arctic atmosphere is driven through photochemistry.<br />
The values found in this work may be preliminarily used for transport and deposition modeling,<br />
as may the proposed reaction mechanism. The experience gained with the pilot system lead to<br />
development of a new system. Experience with the annular denuder method for RGM collection<br />
(Landis et al., 2002), confirms that it is a sensitive method for measuring RGM, but must be applied<br />
carefully to ensure comparable results. The work supports the need for an RGM calibration unit,<br />
and an RGM inter-calibration and standardization study, to be carried out in the spring, 2003, in<br />
Svalbard (see Schroeder et al., 2003).<br />
The atmospheric bomb pulse curve<br />
A high time resolution series of trace metals is urgently needed for pollutants such as Hg to<br />
evaluate the effects of emission controls, and to help calibrate atmospheric transport models. A<br />
necessary pre-requisite to establishing this time series is development of a dating method that<br />
provides this type of time resolution.<br />
For a successful dating method, first there must be an accepted way to calibrate results, and<br />
then show that the calibration, when applied experimentally, produces reliable results. Figure 15.,<br />
page 79, shows several records of 14 C covering the bomb-pulse period, for the northernmost
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 112<br />
northern hemisphere, 20-90 0 N latitude. None of the so far published records from tree rings, as<br />
seen in the figure, covered the whole second half of the 20 th century, Therefore, tree ring and<br />
cottonseed data from Arizona as well as data from Denmark was added to complete the curve.<br />
Previously unpublished Atmospheric measurements provided by I. Levin, University of Heidelberg,<br />
consisting of the annually averaged atmospheric 14 CO2 curve for the northernmost northern<br />
hemisphere is plotted and recommended for use as the general bomb-pulse calibration curve for the<br />
northern hemisphere for 4 reasons: 1) the data from Arizona closely follow the curve but do not<br />
provide annual resolution, this is the limitation of any of the data from particular points or terrestrial<br />
sources; 2) the curve provides consistent, carefully checked atmospheric data covering the whole<br />
pulse until the present, 3) The portion of this data set up through 1997, is published and widely used<br />
(Levin et al., 1997); differences for the other curves results in calibrated age differences of only 1-2<br />
years from the data provided by Levin.<br />
As then seen in Figure 15., page 79, for the northernmost northern hemisphere it is most<br />
appropriate to use the Levin data as a calibration tool in General, though depending on location,<br />
there are local features, e.g. testing around China that this curve now provides a ready reference to.<br />
For more detail discussion, see Goodsite et al., 2002, Appendix C. this work is the first time that<br />
bomb-pulse dating was successfully applied to peat. This was primarily a function of having the<br />
appropriate calibration curve, and sampling and handling the peat appropriately, as discussed in the<br />
paper.<br />
The successful development of this method means that now, when it is able to be applied and<br />
used, the greatest source of error in determining a chronological series of a trace metal in peat no<br />
longer comes from the date determination, but rather comes from sampling and handling. With<br />
especially the mundane determination of bulk density in peat now providing the greatest source of<br />
error, when calculating accumulation rates.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 113<br />
This method can be applied where standard-dating methods cannot be, for example in peat<br />
disturbed by digging or cutting. The limitation of this method is that it only covers the last half of<br />
the 20 th century. The primary gain is that the chronology is an order of magnitude better than<br />
standard chronological dating methods.<br />
Figure 16., page 80, shows high resolution dating is applied successfully for the first time in<br />
Denmark and Greenland. In Denmark, due to peat digging during WWII, the Pb-210 dating method<br />
could only be applied with error an order of magnitude higher than that provided by the bomb-pulse<br />
method. In Greenland application of the method allowed for the first coastal high time resolution<br />
investigation of trace metal accumulation in an environmental archive in the Arctic.<br />
In Figure 17a. and b., page 83; 18a. and 18b., page 84; 19., page 85; and 20., page 86, it is seen<br />
that in the minerotrophic southern Greenland, and the blanket bog on the Faroe Islands, that the<br />
chronology of Hg accumulation is similar to that of the ombrotrophic bog in Denmark, during the<br />
last 50 years. This suggests that in remote areas, Hg is supplied to the wetlands primarily via<br />
atmospheric deposition, demonstrating that given the proper conditions, minerotrophic sediments<br />
provide a history of atmospheric deposition as consistent as one provided by a raised bog. It is also<br />
seen that dry bulk density is very variable, most likely the result of sampling and determination<br />
methods.<br />
Hg fluxes in the Greenland core (0.3 to 0.5 µg m -2 yr -1 ) were found in peats dating from AD<br />
550 to AD 975, compared to the maximum of 164 µg m -2 yr -1 in 1953. Atmospheric Hg<br />
accumulation rates have since declined with the value for 1995, 14 µg m -2 yr -1 comparable to<br />
published 1995 values from the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (Christensen et al., 2002, also<br />
found in Skov et al., 2003, Appendix C), of 12 µg m -2 yr -1 for southern Greenland.<br />
In Denmark, the greatest rate of atmospheric Hg accumulation is found in 1953, 184 µg m -2 yr -<br />
1 , comparable to that of Greenland with the flux going into sharp decline, with an accumulation rate
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 114<br />
for 1994 as 14 µg m -2 yr -1 . This compares well with the modelled rate of 18 µg m -2 yr -1 for all of<br />
Denmark as well as previous studies (e.g., Madsen, 1981). On the Faroe Islands, the maximum<br />
mercury concentration was 498 ng g -1 , dated to be in 1954 +/-2, with a 210 Pb constant rate of supply<br />
dating model, in good agreement with historical maximums in 1953 in S. Greenland and Denmark.<br />
Depositional maximum was in 1985, 34.3 µg m -2 yr -1 , with the 1995 value of 18 µg m -2 yr -1 ,<br />
comparing with Denmark and the modelled value of approximately 10 µg m -2 yr -1 . The present day<br />
value of approximately 10 µg m -2 yr -1 compares well with recently reported wet deposition<br />
measurements of 7 µg m -2 yr -1 (Daugaard, 2003).<br />
Long-term accumulation rate of mercury in this core was 0.95 ± 0.36 µg m -2 yr -1 for the period<br />
of 4200 B.C. to AD 833; n = 61, in agreement with other reported peat studies, and what would be<br />
expected in a remote area. The Hg concentrations in the Faroe Islands are higher than those found in<br />
cores from other sites, but the net Hg accumulation rates are comparable.<br />
The depositional records in the peat are in good agreement with what would be predicted:<br />
lower depositional rates at sites further North from European industries; and in agreement with<br />
previous atmospheric measurements that showed that total gaseous mercury in Europe reached an<br />
average annual maximum in the late 1980’s and have been falling since 1990 decreasing globally<br />
by 22% from 1990 - 1994 (Slemr et al., 1995 and references therein, Slemr et al., 2003). Schuster et<br />
al. (2002) used a glacial ice-core record to study atmospheric mercury deposition during the last 270<br />
years, concluding that the anthropogenic contribution during the last 100 years rose to 70 percent of<br />
the total, a 20 fold increase over background, yet falling the last decade. The mercury depositional<br />
rates and probable sources are determined in Denmark, Southern Greenland, and the Faroe Islands,<br />
using lead and stable lead isotope signatures. Surprisingly, on Nordvestø, Carey Islands, lead was<br />
below detection limits. This is the first time observed in such low levels in peat. Therefore the peat
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 115<br />
record from Nordvestø is providing a unique, perhaps biogenic record of the mid Holocene. The<br />
study is on going and more cores are being analyzed from Nordvestø.<br />
Global and Arctic significance<br />
The peat studies in this work document that not only has anthropogenic activity caused mercury<br />
to accumulate in the Arctic, but also provides apparent support to the fact that anthropogenic<br />
actions, for example closing of chlor alkali plants, in the latest decades has caused a significant<br />
decline in mercury accumulation in the Arctic environment. The peat studies support that the<br />
observed rise and fall in mercury accumulation in recent times is strongly related to coal use<br />
(Shotyk et al., 2003, Appendix C).<br />
Unfortunately, the peat profiles that could be investigated with high time resolution come from<br />
areas of the Arctic where mercury depletion events have not been observed, therefore not answering<br />
the question of if these profiles would look the same, given that they take place in a AMDE active<br />
area.<br />
The core from the Carey Islands, while from an area expected to have AMDEs, is too disturbed<br />
in the active layer to investigate this. Lake and Marine sediments from the high Arctic, coastal site<br />
near Station Nord, may provide some insight into this, once dating results are completed, so that the<br />
cores can be analyzed further, but preliminary comparison with other Arctic sediments, does not<br />
indicate an increased rate of accumulation. This means that mercury being deposited to the Arctic<br />
may be coming out again.<br />
There are three routes that deposited mercury could be redistributed, so that there is no<br />
terrestrial accumulation signature: 1 uptake into the biosystem, 2 transport away from the Arctic<br />
after emission into the marine system or 3. re-emission into the atmospheric system, with<br />
subsequent transport away from the Arctic outside the spring months. Determining a mercury mass<br />
balance for the Arctic should be a future priority.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 116<br />
In the high Arctic, due to the slow sedimentation of environmental archives, one of the ways to<br />
see any tendency is to continue long-term environmental monitoring studies.<br />
The background levels of mercury in the peat core are very consistent with what is understood<br />
of the global cycling of mercury and its long atmospheric residence time. The cores show some<br />
variation due to natural process, geogenic or climatic, and the reasons for these pre industrial<br />
variations should be more closely examined in the future, since it may provide insight into the<br />
question of how the expected warming climate will affect mercury deposition to the Arctic in the<br />
future, having observed how it was affected in the past, though without human effects.<br />
Even though mercury deposition may be declining, there are recently still negative effects<br />
observed such as attenuated growth of breast fed children exposed to increased concentrations of<br />
methyl mercury and other contaminants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (Grandjean et al.,<br />
2003).<br />
Munthe et al., (in press) summarized that the global nature of mercury transport affects not only<br />
local areas, but regions such as Europe. Therefore control measures in Europe will not reduce<br />
atmospheric deposition to acceptable levels in Northern Europe. They state that “there is a need to<br />
assess the hemispherical and global background levels and to what extent these are impacted by<br />
anthropogenic emission.” This work shows that by coming peat archives with stable lead isotope<br />
measurements and high time resolution dating, that future assessments may be made using this type<br />
of environmental archive.<br />
Gårdfelt et al., (in press) measured and modeled that 66 tonnes of mercury are released to the<br />
atmosphere from the Mediterranean Sea during the summer. They corroborate measurements in the<br />
Atlantic showing that this type of evasion is not confined to the temperate regions. Oceanic evasion<br />
should therefore be looked at in the Arctic region as a possible source of Hg to the Arctic.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 117<br />
5. Conclusion and future work<br />
This work provides a better understanding of the temporal, and spatial patterns of mercury<br />
deposition and accumulation in the Arctic, gaining information of the chemical and depositional<br />
processes so that they might be applied to parameterise models of atmospheric transport and<br />
deposition and eventually aid in making policy decisions.<br />
The post solar sunrise deposition of reactive gaseous mercury to the Arctic, and the<br />
depositional velocity of RGM was quantified during a campaign in Barrow Alaska. To do this, a<br />
RGM REA micrometeorological flux system was developed for Arctic use, and RGM flux<br />
measurements made for the first time in the Arctic. Lessons learned from the first campaign were<br />
applied to redevelop the system. Based on experimental observations a plausible reaction<br />
mechanism for the oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury to reactive gaseous mercury was<br />
presented. Continued improvement of the annular denuder measurement method for Arctic use is<br />
needed, as is standardization, an RGM calibration system and an intercomparison campaign, to<br />
ensure robust, inter-comparable and accurate measurements in the future. An annual time series of<br />
wet and dry depositional flux is needed. Since the development of automatic RGM sampling<br />
systems, it may be possible to automate a REA RGM flux measurement system, readily enabling<br />
this monitoring. Laboratory kinetic studies of Hg and the halogens, especially Br are needed. It<br />
should be a goal to find out exactly what RGM is in the Arctic.<br />
Peat archives of environmental pollution were located and investigated in the Arctic, and in<br />
Denmark so that the pre and post-industrial values of Hg in the Arctic were determined. A high time<br />
resolution dating method was developed, allowing the peat profiles to be intercompared and<br />
providing information as to accumulation over the last 50 years. Methods were developed and<br />
advanced for determination of mercury in peat and for the sampling of peat in the Arctic. Detailed
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 118<br />
studies need to be carried out in suitable environmental archives in areas where mercury depletion<br />
events occur to determine if there is an enhanced sedimentary Hg accumulation.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 119<br />
Glossary, acronyms and abbreviations<br />
The terms, acronyms and abbreviations below may appear in this thesis. Whenever possible, they<br />
have been harmonized with those terms used in the UNEP global mercury assessment report for<br />
standardization purposes.<br />
< - less than;<br />
> - greater than;<br />
°C - degree Celsius (centigrade);<br />
µg – microgram (10 -6 gram);<br />
µg kg -1 body weight per day – micrograms per kilogram body weight per day; units used for<br />
describing intakes (or doses) of mercury such as intakes that are considered safe for humans; ADI -<br />
acceptable daily intake;<br />
AMAP - The Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme;<br />
AMDE – Atmospheric mercury depletion episode, latest name for mercury depletion episodes<br />
(MDEs, mercury depletion incidents (MDIs) pertaining to the perennial oxidation of gaseous<br />
elemental mercury to the operationally defined reactive gaseous mercury, first observed in the<br />
Arctcic in 1995;<br />
ATSDR – USA Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry;<br />
Balance (=budget) - totality of quantitative estimates of input and output substance fluxes for a<br />
given geophysical reservoir or societal entity;<br />
Dry deposition - process of species transport from the atmosphere to the underlying surface at their<br />
direct (without precipitation) physical-chemical interaction with elements of the underlying surface;<br />
dry deposition is of a continuous character independent of the occurrence or absence of atmospheric<br />
precipitation;<br />
FIS – one of the Faroe Island mercury exposure studies;<br />
Flux - amount of mercury deposited over a defined are per a defined time interval;<br />
Hg – mercury;<br />
Hg 0 or Hg(0) - elemental mercury;<br />
Hg 2+ or Hg(II) - divalent mercury - the dominating mercury form in organic and inorganic mercury<br />
compounds. In the atmosphere, mercury species with divalent mercury are more easily washed out<br />
of the air with precipitation and deposited than elemental mercury;<br />
Hgp - particulate mercury - mercury bound in, or adsorbed on, particulate material. In the<br />
atmosphere, particulate mercury is deposited much faster than elemental mercury;<br />
kg – kilogram;<br />
l or L – litre;<br />
Life-time - In atmospheric physical-chemistry: Time during which the first order processes (or<br />
totality of the first order processes) of scavenging results in mercury species mass reduction in e<br />
times in a geophysical reservoir; for a reservoir with homogeneous mercury species distribution the<br />
life-time is equal to the ratio of the mass contained in the reservoir to scavenging rate. Since the<br />
mass of mercury in the reservoir left to be reacted or removed decreases over time, the amount<br />
reacted or removed per unit of time decreases in a natural logarithmic fashion. For example, a
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 120<br />
lifetime of mercury of one year, does not mean that it would all be gone in one year if emissions<br />
were zero. It means that the rate of removal at the start of the time period in terms of mass per unit<br />
time would remove it all in one year, but since the rate of removal decreases as the mass of mercury<br />
left decreased, the amount of mercury left after one year would be (1/e) times the initial mass,<br />
where "e" is 2.71828183 defined to 8 decimals;<br />
Load - the intensity of input of pollutants to a given ecosystem from the environment; atmospheric<br />
load - the intensity of input from the atmosphere;<br />
m – meter;<br />
MBL – marine boundary layer; the air right over the ocean surface, where exchange of mercury<br />
between the two compartments takes place;<br />
MethylHg or MeHg or MHg – methylmercury; CH3Hg;<br />
metric ton – 1000 kg;<br />
mg – milligram (10 -3 gram);<br />
Natural emission - mercury input to the atmosphere, which is not connected with current or<br />
previous human activity;<br />
ng – nanogram (10 -9 gram);<br />
pg – picogram (10 -12 gram);<br />
POPs - Persistent Organic Pollutants;<br />
ppb – parts per billion;<br />
ppm - parts per million;<br />
Pre-industrial state - a conventional term implying the state of the natural mercury cycle before<br />
the beginning of human industrial activity; in Europe the beginning of a noticeable production and<br />
consumption of mercury is related to medieval centuries;<br />
Re-emission - secondary input of mercury to the atmosphere from geochemical reservoirs (soil, sea<br />
water, fresh water bodies) where mercury has been accumulating as a result of previous and current<br />
human activity;<br />
REA – Relaxed Eddy Accumulation, micrometeorological method of measuring flux that allows<br />
calculating flux based on differences in concentration in up drafts and down drafts, accumulated in<br />
a reservoir over time. REA is generally employed for trace gases that cannot be analyzed<br />
instantaneously;<br />
RGM – Reactive Gaseous Mercury; an operationally defined term for gaseous divalent mercury<br />
compounds of the type HgXY (typically HgCl2) though in the Arctic perhaps HgBr2;<br />
Ton = 1 metric tonne see metric tonne;<br />
UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme;<br />
US EPA – Environmental Protection Agency of the United States of America;<br />
USA – United States of America;<br />
Wet deposition - flux of substance from the atmosphere onto the underlying surface with<br />
atmospheric precipitation;<br />
WHO - World Health Organization;
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 121<br />
Bibliography<br />
1. Allegrini, I., De Santis, F., Di Palo, V., Febo, A., Perrino, C., Possanzini, M., and Liberti,<br />
A., (1987): Annular denuder method for sampling of atmospheric pollutants. Science of the<br />
Total Environment 67, 1–16.<br />
2. Appleby,P.G. and Oldfield, F., (1978): The calculation of 210 Pb dates assuming a constant<br />
rate of supply of unsupported 210 Pb to the sediment. Catena, 5:1-8<br />
3. Ariya, P.A., Ghalizov, A. and Gidas, A., (2002): Reactions of gaseous mercury with atomic<br />
and molecular halogens: Kinetics, products studies and atmospheric implications. Journal of<br />
Physical Chemistry-A, 106, 7310-7320.<br />
4. Barrie, L. A.; Bottenheim, J. W.; Schnell, R. C.; Crutzen, P. J.; Rasmussen, R. A., (1988):<br />
Ozone destruction and photochemical reactions at polar sunrise in the lower Arctic<br />
atmosphere. Nature (London, United Kingdom), 334(6178), 138-41.<br />
5. Barrie, L.; Platt, U., (1997): Arctic tropospheric chemistry. An overview. Tellus, Series B:<br />
Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 49B(5), 450-454.<br />
6. Bemgård A, Colmsjö A, Melin J., (1996): Assessing breakthrough times for denuder<br />
samplers with emphasis on volatile organic compounds. Journal of Chromatography, 723,<br />
301-311.<br />
7. Berg, T.; Bartnicki, J.; Munthe, J.; Lattila, H.; Hrehoruk, J.; Mazur, A., (2001):<br />
Atmospheric mercury species in the European Arctic: Measurements and modelling.<br />
Atmospheric Environment, 35(14), 2569-2582.<br />
8. Berg, T., Sekkesæter, S., Steinnes, E., Valdal, A-K, and Wibetoe, G., (2003):Springtime<br />
depletion of mercury in the European Arctic as observed at Svalbard, The Science of The<br />
Total Environment, Volume 304, Issues 1-3, 20 March 2003, Pages 43-51.<br />
9. Bottenheim, J.W., Personal communication (2002): presented 10 Nov 02, Workshop on<br />
Ocean-Sea Ice-Snowpack-Atmosphere Interactions Research, Purdue University, USA.<br />
10. Boudries, H. and Bottenheim, J. W., (2000): Cl and Br atom concentrations during a surface<br />
boundary layer ozone depletion event in the Canadian High Arctic. Geophysical Research<br />
Letters 27, 517-520.<br />
11. Bowling, D. R.; Delany, A. C.; Turnipseed, A. A.; Baldocchi, D. D.; Monson, R. K., (1999):<br />
Modification of the relaxed eddy accumulation technique to maximize measured scalar<br />
mixing ratio differences in updrafts and downdrafts. Journal of Geophysical Research,<br />
[Atmospheres], 104(D8), 9121-9133.<br />
12. Businger J.A. and Oncley, S.P., (1990): Flux measurement with conditional sampling.<br />
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 7, pp. 349–352.<br />
13. Cadle, S.H., Dasch, J.M., and Mulawa, P.A., (1985): Atmospheric concentrations and the<br />
deposition velocity to snow of nitric acid, sulfur dioxide and various particulate species.<br />
Atmospheric Environment (19), 1819 - 1827.<br />
14. Christensen, C.S.; Hummelshoj, P.; Jensen, N. O.; Larsen, B.; Lohse, C.; Pilegaard, K.;<br />
Skov, H., (2000): Determination of the terpene flux from orange species and Norway<br />
spruce by relaxed eddy accumulation. Atmospheric Environment, 34(19), 3057-3067.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 122<br />
15. Christensen, J.H. Brandt, J. Frohn, L.M. and Skov, H. “Modelling of mercury with the<br />
Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model” Submitted to Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics<br />
April 2002.<br />
16. Cobos, Douglas R.; Baker, John M.; Nater, Edward A., (2002): Conditional sampling for<br />
measuring mercury vapor fluxes. Atmospheric Environment, 36(27), 4309-4321.<br />
17. Cress, R.G., Williams, M.W., Sievering, H., (1995): Dry deposition loading of nitrogen to<br />
an alpine snowpack, Niwot Ridge, CO, in: Biogeochemistry of Seasonal Snow-Covered<br />
Catchments, IAHS press, publication no. 228, Wallington, UK, pp. 33–40.<br />
18. Desjardins, R.L., (1972): A study of carbon dioxide and sensible heat fluxes using the eddy<br />
correlation technique. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.<br />
19. Daugaard, B., (2003) Mercury in the North Atlantic, M.Sc. Thesis, University of Southern<br />
Denmark, Department of Chemistry.<br />
20. Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H. H., Schmolke, S. R., (2001): Measurements of atmospheric<br />
mercury with high time resolution: Recent applications in environmental research and<br />
monitoring, Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Vol 371, 6, 806-815.<br />
21. Ebinghaus, R., Kock, H.H., Temme, C., Einax, J.W., Lowe, A.G., Richter, A., Burrows, J.P.<br />
and Schroeder, W.H. (2002): Antarctic Springtime Depletion of Atmospheric Mercury.<br />
Environmental Science and Technology 36, 1238-1244.<br />
22. Ernst, E. and Coon, J.T. (2001): Heavy metals in traditional Chinese medicines: A<br />
systematic review. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 2001, Vol. 70; Number 6: 497-<br />
504.<br />
23. Feilberg A., (2000): Atmospheric Chemistry of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds with<br />
Special Emphasis on Nitro Derivates, Ph. D Dissertation, Information Service Department<br />
Risø.<br />
24. Garvey, J.G., Hahn, G., Lee, R.V. and Harbison, R.D., (2001): Heavy metal hazards of<br />
Asian traditional remedies. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 2001,<br />
11: 63-71.<br />
25. Goodsite, <strong>Michael</strong> E.; Rom, Werner; Heinemeier, Jan; Lange, Todd; Ooi, Suat; Appleby,<br />
Peter G.; Shotyk, William; van der Knaap, W. O.; Lohse, Christian; Hansen, Torben S.<br />
High-resolution AMS 14C dating of post-bomb peat archives of atmospheric pollutants.<br />
Radiocarbon (2001), 43(2B), 495-515.<br />
26. Goodsite, M.E., Brooks, S.B., Lindberg, S.E. Meyers, T.P Skov, H. and Larsen, M.R.B.,<br />
(2003): The fluxes of reactive gaseous mercury measured with a newly developed method<br />
using relaxed eddy accumulation. Submitted to Atmospheric Environment, June 2003.<br />
27. Goodsite, M.E. Plane, J. Skov, H., (2003): A theoretical study of the oxidation of Hg 0 to<br />
HgBr2 in the troposphere. Submitted to Environmental Science and Technology, June 2003.<br />
28. Gormley P., and Kennedy, M., (1949): Diffusion for a stream flowing through a cylindrical<br />
tube. Proceedings Royal Irish Academy, 52A:163-167.<br />
29. Grandjean P, Weihe P, Jørgensen PJ, Clarkson T, Cernichiari E, Viderø T., (1992): Impact<br />
of maternal seafood diet on fetal exposure to mercury, selenium, and lead, Archives of<br />
Environmental Health, 47: 185-95.<br />
30. Grandjean P, Weihe P, Needham LL, Burse VW, Patterson DG Jr, Sampson EJ, Jørgensen<br />
PJ, Vahter M., (1995): Effect of a seafood diet on mercury, selenium, arsenic, and PCBs and<br />
other organochlorines in human milk. Environmental Research, 71: 29-38.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 123<br />
31. Grandjean, P., Weihe, P., White, R.F., Deves, F., Araki, S., Yokoyama, K., Murata, K.,<br />
Sorensen, N., Dahl, R. and Jorgensen, P.J. (1997): Neurotoxicology and Teratology 1997,<br />
20, 1.<br />
32. Grandjean, Philippe; Budtz-Jorgensen, Esben; Steuerwald, Ulrike; Heinzow, Birger;<br />
Needham, Larry L.; Jorgensen, Poul J.; Weihe, Pal., (2003): Attenuated growth of breast-fed<br />
children exposed to increased concentrations of methylmercury and polychlorinated<br />
biphenyls. FASEB Journal (2003), 17(6), 699-701.<br />
33. Grieg, G. Gunning, H.E. and Strausz. (1970) Reactions of metal atoms. II. Combination of<br />
Mercury and Bromine Atoms and the Dimerization of HgBr.The J. Chem. Phys Lett. 52, 7.<br />
3684-3690.<br />
34. Guenther, Alex; Baugh, William; Davis, Ken; Hampton, Gary; Harley, Peter; Klinger, Lee;<br />
Vierling, Lee; Zimmerman, Patrick; Allwine, Eugene; et al. Isoprene fluxes measured by<br />
enclosure, relaxed eddy accumulation, surface layer gradient, mixed layer gradient, and<br />
mixed layer mass balance techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research, [Atmospheres]<br />
(1996), 101(D13), 18555-18567.<br />
35. Gårdfeldt, K., Sommar, J., Ferrara, R., Ceccarini, C., Lanzillotta, E., Munthe, J., Wängberg,<br />
I., Lindqvist, O., Pirrone, N., Sprovieri, F., et al., Evasion of mercury from coastal and open<br />
waters of the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea, Atmospheric Environment, In<br />
Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 23 May 2003, .<br />
36. Hansen, J.C. and Pedersen, H.S. (1986): Environmental exposure to heavy metals in North<br />
Greenland. Arctic Medical Research 41: 21-34. As cited in AMAP, 1998.<br />
37. Hering, S. V.; Lawson, D. R.; Allegrini, I.; Febo, A.; Perrino, C.; Possanzini, M.; Sickles, J.<br />
E., II; Anlauf, K. G.; Wiebe, A.; et al. (1988): The nitric acid shootout: field comparison of<br />
measurement methods. Atmospheric Environment (1967-1989), 22(8), 1519-39.<br />
38. Hylander, L.D., and Meili, M., (2003): 500 years of mercury production: global annual<br />
inventory by region until 2000 and associated emissions, The Science of The Total<br />
Environment, Volume 304, Issues 1-3, Pages 13-27.<br />
39. Hylander, L.D., Sollenberg, H., and Westas, H., (2003): A three-stage system to remove<br />
mercury and dioxins in flue gases, The Science of The Total Environment, Volume 304,<br />
Issues 1-3, Pages 137-144.<br />
40. Johansson C., and Granath, L., (1986): An experimental study of the dry deposition of<br />
gaseous nitric acid to snow. Atmospheric Environment 20, 1165 – 1170.<br />
41. Kaimal, J.C., and Gaynor, J.E., (1991): Another look at sonic thermometry. Boundary Layer<br />
Meteorology, 56, 401-410.<br />
42. Karlsson, E., and Nyholm, S., (1998): Dry deposition and desorption of toxic gases to and<br />
from snow surfaces, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 227-245.<br />
43. Lamborg, C. H., Fitzgerald, W. F., O’Donnell, J. and Torgersen, T. (2002): A non-steadystate<br />
compartmental model of global-scale mercury biogeochemistry with interhemispheric<br />
atmospheric gradients. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66 (7), 1105-1118.<br />
44. Landis, M.S., Personal communication (2001): US EPA, Research Triangle Park, North<br />
Carolina, USA.<br />
45. Landis, M.S., Stevens, R.K., Schaedlich, F. and Prestbo, E.M., (2002): Development and<br />
characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent<br />
inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. Environmental Science and Technology<br />
36, pp. 3000–3009.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 124<br />
46. Levin I, Kromer B, Schoch-Fischer H, Bruns M, Münnich M, Berdau D, Vogel JC, Münnich<br />
KO. (1997): (Personal Communication) 14 CO2 records from two sites in Central—<br />
Schauinsland & Vermunt. URL: .<br />
47. Levin I, Hesshaimer V., (2000): Radiocarbon—a unique tracer of global carbon cycle<br />
dynamics. Radiocarbon 42(1):69-80.<br />
48. Lin, C-J. and Pehkonen, S. O. (1999): The chemistry of Atmospheric Mercury: a review.<br />
Atmospheric Environment, 33, 2067-2079.<br />
49. Lindberg, S.E., Brooks, S., Lin, C.-J., Scott, K., Meyers, T., Chambers, L., Landis, M. and<br />
Stevens, R., 2001. Formation of reactive gaseous mercury in the Arctic: evidence of<br />
oxidation of Hg 0 to gas-phase Hg-II compounds after Arctic sunrise. Water, Air, and Soil<br />
Pollution: Focus 1, pp. 295–302.<br />
50. Lindberg, S. E., Brooks, S., Lin, C. J., Scott, K. J., Landis, M. S., Stevens, R. K., Goodsite,<br />
M. and Richter, A. (2002): Dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere<br />
at polar sunrise. Environmental Science & Technology 36, 1245-1256.<br />
51. Lindqvist, O., and Rodhe, H. (1985): Atmospheric Mercury – a Review. Tellus Series B –<br />
Chem. Phys. Meteorol., 37(3), 136-159.<br />
52. Lu, J. Y., Schroeder, W. H., Barrie, L. A., Steffen, A., Welch, H. E., Martin, K., Lockhart,<br />
L., Hunt, R. V., Boila, G. and Richter, A., (2001): Magnification of atmospheric mercury<br />
deposition to polar regions in springtime: the link to tropospheric ozone depletion chemistry.<br />
Geophysical Research Letters 28, 3219-3222.<br />
53. Madsen, Poul Pheiffer. (1981): Peat bog records of atmospheric mercury deposition. Nature<br />
293 (5828), 127-30.<br />
54. Meyers, T., (2001, 2003): Personal communication, NOAA, ATDD, Oak Ridge TN.<br />
55. Munthe, J., Wängberg, I., Pirrone, N.,. Iverfeldt, Å, Ferrara, R., Ebinghaus, R., Feng, X.,<br />
Gårdfeldt, K., Keeler, G., Lanzillotta E., et al., (2001): Intercomparison of methods for<br />
sampling and analysis of atmospheric mercury species, Atmospheric Environment, Volume<br />
35, Issue 17, Pages 3007-3017.<br />
56. Munthe, J., Wängberg, I., Iverfeldt, Å., Lindqvist, O., Strömberg, D., Sommar, J., Gårdfeldt,<br />
K., Petersen, G., Ebinghaus, R., Prestbo, E., et al., Distribution of atmospheric mercury<br />
species in Northern Europe: final results from the MOE project, Atmospheric Environment,<br />
In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 23 May 2003.<br />
57. Noernberg, T., Goodsite, M.E., Shotyk, W., (in review): An Improved Motorized Corer and<br />
Sample Processing System for Frozen Peat. In review at Arctic.<br />
58. Oncley, Steven P.; Delany, Anthony C.; Horst, Thomas W.; Tans, Pieter P. Verification of<br />
flux measurement using relaxed eddy accumulation. Atmospheric Environment, Part A:<br />
General Topics (1993), 27A(15), 2417-26.<br />
59. Pacyna, E., Pacyna, J.M. and Pirrone, N. (2000): Atmospheric Mercury Emissions in Europe<br />
from Anthropogenic Sources. Atmospheric Environment 35, 2987-2996.<br />
60. Poissant, L., Pilote, M., (2001): Atmospheric mercury and ozone depletion events observed<br />
at low latitude along the Hudson Bay in northern Quebec (Kuujjuarapik: 55°N). Book of<br />
Abstracts (AT-23), Sixth International Conference on Mercury as a Global Pollutant,<br />
Minamata, Japan, October 15–19.<br />
61. Possanzini, M., Febo, A., and Liberti, A. New design of a high performance denuder for the<br />
sampling of atmospheric pollutants. Atmospheric Environment 17 (1983), pp. 2605–2610.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 125<br />
62. Roos-Barraclough F; Givelet N; Martinez-Cortizas A; Goodsite M E; Biester H; Shotyk W.,<br />
(2002): An analytical protocol for the determination of total mercury concentrations in solid<br />
peat samples. Science of the Total Environment, 292(1-2), 129-39.<br />
63. Salvato N, Pirola C., (1996): Analysis of mercury traces by means of solid samples atomic<br />
absorption spectrometry, Microchimica Acta, 123(1–4):63 –71.<br />
64. Schroeder, W. H. and Munthe, J. (1998): Atmospheric Mercury - An Overview.<br />
Atmospheric Environment 32, 809-822.<br />
65. Schroeder, W. H., Anlauf, K. G., Barrie, L.A., Lu, J.Y. and Steffen, A. (1998): Arctic<br />
springtime depletion of mercury. Nature 394, 331-332.<br />
66. Schroeder, W. H., Steffen, A., Scott, K., Bender, T., Prestbo, E., Ebinghaus, R., Lu J. Y.,<br />
and Lindberg, S. E., (2003): Summary report: first international Arctic atmospheric mercury<br />
research workshop, Atmospheric Environment, Volume 37, Issue 18, Pages 2551-2555.<br />
67. Schuster, P.F., Krabbenhoft, D.P., Naftz, D.L., Cecil, L.D., Olson, M.L., Dewild, J.F.,<br />
Susong, D.D., Green, J.R. and Abbott, M.L., (2002): Atmospheric Mercury Deposition<br />
during the Last 270 Years: A Glacial Ice Core Record of Natural and Anthropogenic<br />
Sources. Environmental Science and Technology 36 (11), 2303 -2310.<br />
68. Seigneur, C., Karamchandani, P., Lohman, K., Vijayaraghavan, K. and Shia, R-L. (2001):<br />
Multiscale modeling of the atmospheric fate and transport of mercury. Journal of<br />
Geophysical Research 106 (D21), 27795-27809.<br />
69. Sheu, G.P., and Mason, R.P., (2001): An Examination of Methods for the Measurements of<br />
Reactive Gaseous Mercury in the Atmosphere. Environmental Science and Technology, 35<br />
(6), 1209 -1216.<br />
70. Shotyk, W., Goodsite, M.E., Roos-Barraclough, F., Frei, R., Heinemeier, J., Asmund, G.,<br />
Lohse, C., Hansen, T.S., (in-press): Anthropogenic contributions to atmospheric Hg, Pb and<br />
As accumulation recorded by peat cores from southern Greenland and Denmark dated using<br />
the 14C “bomb pulse curve”. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta accepted 02 June, 2003.<br />
71. Shotyk, W., Goodsite, M.E., Roos-Barraclough, F., Givelet, N., LeRoux, G., Weiss, D.,<br />
Norton, S., Knudsen, K., and Lohse, C., (2003): Unpublished data. Manuscript in<br />
preparation “Atmospheric Mercury and Lead Accumulation Since 5420 14 C yr BP at<br />
Myrarnar, Faroe Islands”<br />
72. Skov, H. (2001) Transport of atmospheric mercury from mid-latitudes to the Arctic A model<br />
and Measurements study. In: EUROTRAC-2 MEPOP Atmospheric cycling of mercury and<br />
persistent organic pollutants subproject description. International Scientific Secretariat GSF-<br />
Forschungszentrum für Umwelt and Gesundheit GmbH; Munich, Germany.<br />
73. Skov, H. Nielsdóttir, M.C. Goodsite, M.E. Christensen, J. Skjøth, C.A. Geernaert, G. Hertel,<br />
O. Olsen, J. (2003 1 ) “Measurements and modelling of gaseous elemental mercury on the<br />
Faroe Islands”. Accepted. Asian Chemistry Letters.<br />
74. Skov, H., Christensen, J., Goodsite, M.E., Heidam, N.Z., Jensen, B., Wåhlin, P., Geernaert,<br />
G. The Fate of Elemental Mercury in Arctic during Atmospheric Mercury Depletion<br />
Episodes and the Load of Atmospheric Mercury to Arctic. Submitted to Environmental<br />
Science and Technology, June 2003.<br />
75. Slemr, F., Schuster, G. and Seiler, W., (1985): Distribution, speciation and budget of<br />
atmospheric mercury. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 3, pp. 407–434.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 126<br />
76. Slemr, F.; Langer, E., (1992): Increase in global atmospheric concentrations of mercury<br />
inferred from measurements over the Atlantic Ocean. Nature (London, United Kingdom),<br />
355(6359), 434-7.<br />
77. Slemr, F.; Junkermann, W.; Schmidt, R.W.H.; Sladkovic, R., (1995): Indication of change in<br />
global and regional trends of atmospheric mercury concentrations. Geophysical Research<br />
Letters, 22(16), 2143-6.<br />
78. Slemr, F., E.-G. Brunke, R. Ebinghaus, C. Temme, J. Munthe, I. Wängberg, W. Schroeder,<br />
A. Steffen, and T. Berg, (2003): Worldwide trend of atmospheric mercury since 1977,<br />
Geophysícal Research Letters, 30(10), 1516.<br />
79. Slinn, W.G., Hasse, L., Hicks, B.B., Hogan, A.W., Lal, D., Liss, P.S., Munnich, K.O., G.A.<br />
Sehmel, G.A., and Vittori, O. (1978): Some aspects of the transfer of atmospheric trace<br />
constituents past the air–sea interface. Atmospheric Environment 15, p. 863.<br />
80. Steffen A., and Schroeder, W., (1999): Standard Operation Procedures Manual For Gaseous<br />
Elemental Mercury Measurements. Canadian Atmospheric Environment Service,<br />
Meteorological Service of Canada, 4905 Dufferin Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H<br />
5T4.<br />
81. Steffen, A., Schroeder, W., Bottenheim, J., Narayan, J., and Fuentes, J.D., (2002):<br />
Atmospheric mercury concentrations: measurements and profiles near snow and ice surfaces<br />
in the Canadian Arctic during Alert 2000, Atmospheric Environment, Volume 36, Issues 15-<br />
16, Pages 2653-2661.<br />
82. Steuerwald, Ulrike; Weihe, Pal; Jorgensen, Poul J.; Bjerve, Kristian; Brock, John; Heinzow,<br />
Birger; Budtz-Jorgensen, Esben; Grandjean, Philippe., (2000): Maternal seafood diet,<br />
methylmercury exposure, and neonatal neurologic function. Journal of Pediatrics (St. Louis),<br />
136(5), 599-605.<br />
83. Sørensen, N., Murata, K., Budtz-Jorgensen, E., Weihe, P. and Grandjean, P. (1999): Prenatal<br />
methylmercury exposure as a cardiovascular risk factor at seven years of age. Epidemiology<br />
1999; 10: 370-375.<br />
84. Tarasick, D. W.; Bottenheim, J. W., (2002): Surface ozone depletion episodes in the Arctic<br />
and Antarctic from historical ozonesonde records. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics<br />
[online computer file], 2: 197-205.<br />
85. Valdez, M.P., Bales, R.C., Stanley D.A., and Dawson, G.A., (1987): Gaseous deposition to<br />
snow: 1. Experimental study of SO2 and NO2 deposition. Journal of. Geophysical Research<br />
92, p. 9779 – 9787.<br />
86. Wardenaar ECP., (1987): A new hand tool for cutting peat. Canadian Journal of Botany,<br />
65:1772 –1773.<br />
87. Weihe, P., Hansen, JC., Murata, K., Debes, F., Jørgensen, PJ., Steuerwald, U., White, RF.<br />
And Grandjean, P. (2002): Neurobehavioral Performance of Inuit Children with Increased<br />
Prenatal Exposure to Methylmercury. International Journal of Circumpolar Health 2002;<br />
61: 41-9.<br />
88. Williston, S.H., (1968): Mercury in the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73:<br />
7051-7055.<br />
89. Yamada, M., Tohno, S., Tohno, Y., Minami, T., Ichii, M., Okazaki, Y. (1995):<br />
Accumulation of mercury in excavated bones of two natives in Japan. Science of the Total<br />
Environment 1995; 162:253-256.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 127<br />
90. Zannetti, P., Air Pollution Modelling. Theories, Computational Methods and Available<br />
Software, Van Nostrand-Reinhold, New York, 1990.<br />
91. Zhu, T.; Pattey, E.; Desjardins, R. L. Relaxed Eddy-Accumulation Technique for<br />
Measuring Ammonia Volatilization. Environmental Science and Technology (2000),<br />
34(1), 199-203.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 128<br />
Appendix A List of Papers
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 129<br />
Paper 1: Goodsite, M.E., Brooks, S.B., Lindberg, S.E. Meyers, T.P Skov, H. and Larsen, M.R.B.<br />
(2003) The Fluxes of Reactive Gaseous Mercury measured with a newly developed method<br />
using Relaxed Eddy Accumulation. Submitted to Atmospheric Environment, June 2003.<br />
Paper 2: Lindberg, Steve E.; Brooks, Steve; Lin, C.-J.; Scott, Karen J.; Landis, Matthew S.;<br />
Stevens, Robert K.; Goodsite, Mike; Richter, Andreas. Dynamic Oxidation of Gaseous<br />
Mercury in the Arctic Troposphere at Polar Sunrise. Environmental Science and Technology<br />
(2002), 36(6), 1245-1256.<br />
Paper 3: Skov, H., Christensen, J., Goodsite, M.E., Heidam, N.Z., Jensen, B., Wåhlin, P.,<br />
Geernaert, G. The Fate of Elemental Mercury in Arctic during Atmospheric Mercury<br />
Depletion Episodes and the Load of Atmospheric Mercury to Arctic. Submitted to<br />
Environmental Science and Technology, June 2003.<br />
Paper 4: Goodsite, M.E., Plane, J. Skov, H. 2003. A theoretical study of the oxidation of Hg 0 to<br />
HgBr2 in the troposphere. Submitted to Environmental Science and Technology, June 2003.<br />
Paper 5: Skov, H., Nielsdóttir, M.C., Goodsite, M.E., Christensen, J., Skjøth, C.A., Geernaert, G.,<br />
Hertel, O. Olsen, J., Measurements and Modelling of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) on<br />
the Faroe Islands; a case study of the difficulties of measuring GEM. Accepted Asian<br />
Chemistry Letters (2003).<br />
Paper 6: Goodsite, <strong>Michael</strong> E.; Rom, Werner; Heinemeier, Jan; Lange, Todd; Ooi, Suat; Appleby,<br />
Peter G.; Shotyk, William; van der Knaap, W. O.; Lohse, Christian; Hansen, Torben S. Highresolution<br />
AMS 14C dating of post-bomb peat archives of atmospheric pollutants.<br />
Radiocarbon (2001), 43(2B), 495-515.<br />
Paper 7: Roos-Barraclough F; Givelet N; Martinez-Cortizas A; Goodsite M E; Biester H; Shotyk<br />
W. An analytical protocol for the determination of total mercury concentrations in solid<br />
peat samples. Science of the Total Environment (2002 Jun 20), 292(1-2), 129-39.<br />
Paper 8: Shotyk, W., Goodsite, M.E., Roos-Barraclough, F., Frei, R., Heinemeier, J., Asmund, G.,<br />
Lohse, C., Hansen, T.S. Anthropogenic contributions to atmospheric Hg, Pb and As<br />
accumulation recorded by peat cores from southern Greenland and Denmark dated using<br />
the 14C “bomb pulse curve”. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta accepted 02 June, 2003.<br />
Paper 9: Noernberg, T., Goodsite, M.E., Shotyk, W., An Improved Motorized Corer and<br />
Sample Processing System for Frozen Peat. In review at Arctic.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 130<br />
Other relevant publications not included in this thesis:<br />
Peer reviewed papers, not including those in preparation.<br />
Ferrari, C.P., Dommergue, A., Boutron, C., Skov, H., Goodsite, M.E., Jensen, B. Night<br />
Production of Elemental Gaseous Mercury in Interstitial Air of Snow at Station Nord,<br />
Greenland Shortly After Polar Sunrise. In revision at Atmospheric Environment.<br />
Technical reports<br />
Goodsite, M.E., Hermanson, M., Scholten, C., Asmund, G., Skov, H., Bennike, O., Heidam, N.Z.,<br />
Feilberg, A., Geernaert, G.L., Report for the Royal Danish Air Force, Tactical Air Command<br />
Contaminant impact on the high Arctic environment from a small military airstrip and<br />
station: Station Nord, NE Greenland. National Environmental Research Institute, Department<br />
of Atmospheric Environment, Roskilde, Denmark, 2003<br />
Skov, H., Christensen, J.H. Goodsite, M.E. Petersen, M.C. Zeuthen-Heidam, N. Geernaert, G. and<br />
Olsen, J. (2001) Dynamics and chemistry of atmospheric mercury. Danish contribution to<br />
EUROTRAC MEPOP report, 2000.<br />
Brooks, S.B. Lindberg, S.E., Goodsite, M., Meyers, T.P., McConville, G. Springtime Deposition<br />
Rates of Atmospheric Mercury at Barrow, Alaska Followed by Partial Re-emission at<br />
Snowmelt. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Research Administration 2000 scientific<br />
review and report.<br />
Brooks, S.B. Lindberg, S.E., Goodsite, M., Stevens, R.K., Landis, M., Scott, K., Meyers, T.P., Lin,<br />
J., and McConville, G. Barrow Arctic Mercury Study The National Oceanic and Atmospheric<br />
Research Administration 2000 scientific review and report.<br />
Shotyk, W., Goodsite, M., Givelet, N., Roos-Barraclough, F., Knudsen, K., Asmund, G.,<br />
Cheburkin, A., and Heinemeier, J. Peat Core Records of Natural and Anthropogenic<br />
Atmospheric Mercury in the Arctic. a short report prepared for the Danish Coorperation for<br />
Environment in the Arctic (DANCEA).<br />
N. Givelet, W, Shotyk and M. Goodsite. Long term records of atmospheric deposition of Hg,<br />
Cd, Pb and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Peat Cores from Arctic peatlands<br />
(Bathurst Island). A progress report to the International Arctic Research Center (IARC).<br />
Roos, F., Goodsite, M.E., Knudsen, K., and W. Shotyk. The Investigation and Dating of<br />
transboundary air pollution found in the Faroe Islands. A progress report to the<br />
International Arctic Research Center (IARC).<br />
Goodsite, M.E., Shotyk, W. (2000) Chronology of atmospheric Pb fluxes recorded by peat<br />
profiles in Southern Greenland and Denmark.) Final report, submitted to H. von Storch,<br />
GKSS (Germany).<br />
Field Reports<br />
Goodsite, M.E., Bennike, O., Warncke, E., Nørnberg, T. Post Expedition Field and Status<br />
Report: Long term records of atmospheric deposition of Hg, Cd, Pb and Persistent<br />
Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Peat Cores from Arctic peatlands (Nordvestø, Carey Islands,<br />
Greenland). A field report to the Danish Polar Center, and DANCEA (2001).<br />
Goodsite, M.E., Shotyk, W., Post Expedition Field and Status Report: Long term records of<br />
atmospheric deposition of Hg, Cd, Pb and Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in Peat<br />
Cores from Arctic peatlands (Bathurst Island). A field report to the International Arctic<br />
Research Center (IARC) and the Polar Continental Shelf Project. (2000).
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 131<br />
F. Roos-Baraclough, K. Knudsen, M. Goodsite, and W. Shotyk. Post Expedition Field and Status<br />
Report: The Investigation and Dating of Transboundary Air Pollution found on the Faroe<br />
Islands. A field report to the Danish Polar Center and DANCEA. (2000).<br />
M. Goodsite. Post Expedition Field and Status Report: The Investigation and Dating of<br />
Transboundary Air Pollution found in Southern Greenland. A field report to the Danish<br />
Polar Center and DANCEA. (1999).<br />
Popular Science<br />
Goodsite, M., Contributing expert in: Arctic Pollution 2002, AMAP, OSLO. ISBN 82-7971-015-9<br />
Goodsite, M., Shotyk, W. & Nielsdóttir, M.C. (2002): Notat: “Torv kanningar av kyksilvuri í<br />
Føroyum”. In: Mikkelsen, B., Hoydal, K., Dam, M. og Danielsen, J. 2002. ”Føroya Umhvørvi í<br />
Tølum 2001” Heilsufrøðiliga Starvstovan, rapport nr. 2002:1, pp 22 (in Faroese).<br />
Goodsite, M.E., “Atombombsprængninger kan bruges til datering af forurening i de arktiske<br />
områder” Fønix, Nr. 4. 2001, (in Danish), NERI, Denmark.<br />
Goodsite, M.E., ”Få bedre forskningsøkonomi ved at tænke som en sportsklub” Fønix, Nr 3. 2001,<br />
(in Danish), NERI, Denmark.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 132<br />
Appendix B Field Work: planning and post expedition report format
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 133<br />
The purpose of conducting environmental sampling field work in the arctic is to expeditiously,<br />
effectively and efficiently collect the environmental samples required to carry out the proposed and<br />
permitted research with a minimum impact to the fragile and pristine environment. During the<br />
conduct of this Ph.D. field work was conducted at three separate high Arctic locations under 3<br />
different country jurisdictions as well as sub arctic or continental locations in 4 different countries.<br />
While the expedition guidelines discussed below can in the strictest sense be applied to any<br />
operation, it is up to the leader/planner to adjust the guidelines to ensure success in their own<br />
assignments. It is furthermore cautioned that these suggestions do not replace any agency’s<br />
guidelines or training; they are here to give an impression of the process used while carrying out the<br />
field work in this Ph.D. thesis.<br />
The high Arctic can is an unforgiving environment, apparently devoid of most resources<br />
normally associated as essential to survival (such as firewood). It is a demanding work environment<br />
and requires careful planning for success. All Arctic research support agencies have advisors<br />
available to assist with planning and logistics, and these agencies also have their own set of<br />
operating guidelines, though it should be noted that nearly all guidelines build upon the same<br />
purpose and principles mentioned above. Never the less it should be noted that even the most<br />
carefully developed plans must be readily open for change and back up sites and plans are essential.<br />
Arctic weather conditions WILL change schedules and tax men and material resources. Flexibility<br />
and patience must be key words when working in the Arctic. Attitude is an often forgotten attribute.<br />
The will to survive, as well as believing that there are “no problems, only challenges” will carry one<br />
through many situations, even if training and routine are not completely up to speed, though<br />
certainly good training instills routine and confidence!
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 134<br />
It is incumbent of the expedition leader (EL), who may or may not also be the primary<br />
scientific investigator to coordinate with the appropriate permitting and control agencies in the area<br />
of operations well in advance. Some typical permitting requirements include taking of geologic or<br />
biologic samples, weapons and radio permits, wildlife permits, over-flight permits, military base<br />
transit permits, insurance...each area in the Arctic has specific requirements and many have separate<br />
permit issuing coordinators or jurisdiction depending if the purpose is scientific exploration or<br />
mineralogical (economic geological or private) exploration.<br />
It is appropriate to note that submitting an application to one of these agencies as the responsible EL<br />
carries responsibility that must careful be considered namely: the expedition leader is responsible to<br />
the agency for the safety of the team and the protection of the environment, as well as adherence to<br />
the conditions of the permit. The expedition leader may (and in cases of larger or extended<br />
expeditions should) delegate authority to carry out routine tasks (such as radio or wildlife watches)<br />
but should be aware that responsibility can not be delegated and therefore the leader will be<br />
ultimately responsible for all the team accomplishes or fails to accomplish. The 11 general planning<br />
steps utilized are described as below. These steps expand upon and modify a military (8 step) troop-<br />
leading procedure:<br />
1) Receive the assignment:<br />
Ensure that the assignment is clear and well defined. Conduct an initial analysis of the assignment<br />
defining the: Purpose of the field work, the minimum equipment requirements to accomplish the<br />
field work, the type of terrain and weather in the area of operations (check this against maps, photos<br />
and meteorological data available for the area) and cross check this with equipment requirements;<br />
the personnel and expertise required to carry out the proposed field work. Identify absolutely<br />
assignment essential and secondary personnel to the team. Team members must know their roles
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 135<br />
and must be chosen carefully. In the event of unplanned circumstances the team must be able to<br />
function effectively they must be able to cross function in the event someone is not able to function.<br />
In times when the work is hindered due to weather, the team should be able to spend many hours<br />
together in typically confined environments without too much mental discomfort. Identify the<br />
amount of time available for planning and for the operation its-self. Use no more than 1/3 of the<br />
planning time available for your own preliminary purposes. Leave 2/3 of the time to finish<br />
preparing for the field work with your team. It is generally helpful to think through the above<br />
process using reverse planning: i.e., use the desired end-state as a planning start point, and bring<br />
back the planning to the present, establishing a list over the tasks that must be accomplished prior to<br />
leaving for the field to ensure the team is prepared for success. At this stage of the planning process,<br />
the desired end state should be getting to the field location successfully. Lastly look at the planned<br />
budget give the tentative resource needed list. Make an honest judgement at this point in time if the<br />
desired work can be accomplished with the resources available. Contacting agencies and verify<br />
with experts that there is a reasonable chance for the operation to obtain permits at the area, with the<br />
time and resources available: Have a time range to work with and alternate sites to propose to the<br />
granting agencies. Solidify a tentative timeline based on no adverse information relating to wildlife,<br />
weather or logistical factors which the agencies know to be problematic for the area of operation.<br />
2) Alert your team:<br />
Address items that must be prepared for by the team to accomplish the assignment. Involve<br />
alternates already at this stage. A team that is used to working together, or has well defined job<br />
assignments and routines will know to initiate these routines at this point in time. Ensure that your<br />
team is aware of the nature and purpose of assignment, any special instructions (and to whom) and<br />
when the planned date is. Remind them to check already now that they have current certifications<br />
and passports (at the planned time of the field work).
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 136<br />
3) Make a tentative plan to accomplish your assignment:<br />
Accomplish a more careful and complete analysis with your assistant expedition leader, find and<br />
define the explicit tasks to accomplish the field work (e.g., sample peat) and the implied tasks (i.e.,<br />
need a peat sampler if don’t already have one!). Remember to take into account the weight of<br />
samples leaving when planning for what can be brought out coming. Consult with a pilot if flying to<br />
determine if fuel weight loss compensates from the in-bound flight compensates for this (if they<br />
will fly with less than a full tank). Determine the need for fuel and store depots and make a plan for<br />
their pre-placement (to be initiated upon receipt of permits). Estimate how weather and terrain will<br />
affect your mobility and survivability. Task-organize your planned field work and teams. Allow for<br />
flexibility! Develop primary and alternate courses of action. Talk these through with your assistant.<br />
Make a decision as to the primary plan. Update the appropriate agencies of your finalized plan and<br />
team list.<br />
4) Initiate transport of equipment and personnel<br />
Cargo must often be requisitioned long in advance, if borrowed from agency stores. Other cargo<br />
should be shipped well in advance since cargo will have a lower priority on flights in and out of the<br />
Arctic than personal equipment (due to safety considerations). Flights (commercial or military) in<br />
and out of the Arctic are always weather dependent and personnel movement should allow and plan<br />
for delays prior to the start of the assignment. Ensure that control agencies, charters or guides in the<br />
fields are informed of any changes that may occur. Upon arrival to the Arctic airport, check<br />
equipment and personnel. Ensure that all assignment and survival essential gear is functioning.<br />
Communications and weapons are key tools. Ensure that everyone on the team knows how they<br />
function. Don’t mix equipment – your equipment should function as a back-up to the other, so that<br />
you always have one set functioning. Communications should be checked with the local controlling<br />
authority. Leave a map with your routes and plan and leave your frequency and contact plan with
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 137<br />
them – write it on the map and ensure they have at least two copies. Ensure that you and your team<br />
understand the procedures that the controlling authorities will initiate in case of: emergency or if the<br />
team fails to report in with a periodic radio report (QSO). Ensure that all know the call signs and<br />
proper radio procedures. If you will need to talk with a satellite camp, pre-plan and request and<br />
permit internal frequencies off the QSO net. Check you primary navigational and survival aids. Are<br />
GPS’s set for the same datum and coordinate system as your maps (and just as importantly, the<br />
control agencies maps!) are your compasses properly corrected for declination?<br />
5) When possible, reconnoitre to verify the tentative plan:<br />
If nothing else, talk with the people who live there or have just returned form the field, get their<br />
opinion. Listen more than you speak.<br />
6) Complete the plan:<br />
At this point you have all of the input you need for successful fieldwork.<br />
7) Make a written day to plan and issue it to your team:<br />
Ensure that they keep it with their important papers. The plan should carry frequencies and<br />
reminders of emergency procedures. It should include basic medical data (at least blood type) and<br />
next of kin information for each of the members. All should keep this in the same place – so that it<br />
is easily found in case of need. Ensure the controlling authorities receive copies of the plan.<br />
8) Prior to leaving inspect one final time:<br />
Personal survival kits, medical/insurance cards and working permits/passports, weapons and<br />
ammunition, clothing (all should have what is on the packing list, and not more or less, if this is a<br />
weight consideration), equipment (sleeping bags: zippers work? Tents enough pegs etc., assignment<br />
essential equipment and back-up to this equipment. Check Radios, extra batteries, communication<br />
frequencies and protocols. Also ensure Non-radio (visual) communication protocols and sets (signal
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 138<br />
mirrors, flags, smoke and flares), as well as first aid kits, food and water. While inspecting ask your<br />
team about the assignment and their responsibilities ensure that they stay focussed.<br />
9) Conduct the field work in accordance with permits and the work plan:<br />
Note deviations to the plan as they (and they will in the Arctic) arrive. Supervise, remain proactive!<br />
10) Return the base and notify the control authorities of your safe return:<br />
Initiate return cargo and proper keeping or pre-processing of samples. Recuperate.<br />
11) Document the expedition with a post expedition field and status report:<br />
Return to authorities per their instruction (generally 30-90 days post expedition). Use their specified<br />
format. I have developed the following format based on my experience and it is generally<br />
acceptable for turn in (given the proper cover sheets) to Danish, Canadian or American scientific<br />
permitting authorities.<br />
The field report is submitted by the Expedition Leader to the Project Leader (who is ultimately<br />
responsible to the funding agencies) and permitting agencies in fulfilment of the requirements as set<br />
forth in the permit from the issuing authorities. It states why the expedition was carried out and<br />
what is to follow. It is submitted to the respective agencies, which have supported the project or<br />
have substantial interest in its results. It primarily provides a public (or status-file) record of the<br />
expedition, detailing how and where environmental samples were taken for later analysis. The<br />
description should be complete enough to allow another team to resample or “reproduce” the<br />
expedition. It should clearly show that all permitting requirements were upheld and that the<br />
environment was not subjected to damage. In the case of accident or damage, it should clearly<br />
document the circumstances seen from the team’s point of view, and provide evidence that the<br />
proper post-incident procedures and notifications were followed.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 139<br />
Additionally, the present status of the samples is given. The complete project descriptions and<br />
research plans are generally not included (or included only as an appendix) as they are available<br />
through the project leaders and respective funding agencies, and where probably submitted with<br />
permit requests. The report should acknowledge the help of those who made it successful and of the<br />
local population whose land one is investigating as well as support and funding.<br />
An example table of contents follows with the main points and appendixes included in the report.<br />
Example Table of Contents<br />
Preface<br />
Table of Contents<br />
Abstract<br />
Introduction and Background<br />
Site localization<br />
Expeditionary Team and Plan<br />
Project Timeline and Plan (Summary)<br />
General Notes<br />
Day for Day Chronology (Log)<br />
Recon and field notes<br />
Conclusion<br />
Literature<br />
Appendix<br />
1. Complete scientific project timeline and plan<br />
2. Complete field work operation and sampling plan
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 140<br />
3. Photo list<br />
4. Map sheets/air photos<br />
5. Observations (Weather and Biota)<br />
6. Equipment and packing list<br />
7. Copies of permits<br />
GENERAL NOTES: Nearly all reports discuss certain generalities as follow:<br />
1. TRASH: There was at no time food or trash left trash in the field. None of the party<br />
members were smokers, so this includes cigarette butts as well.<br />
2. ELECTRICITY/FUEL: On site fuel supplies were used but replaced with fresh fuel flown<br />
into the site in accordance with the permit.<br />
3. LODG<strong>IN</strong>G/DEPOTS: Field camp/depots established in accordance with permits with<br />
minimum impact on the environment. Camp fires established how and why, cleaned up<br />
how.<br />
4. ROUTE PLANN<strong>IN</strong>G: Routes were reviewed and approved by local authorities and were not<br />
deviated from with out proper notification.<br />
5. SAFETY: All party members carried maps, compass, medical cards and personal first aid<br />
kits. The party always had 2 GPS with, as well as an ANNA (Arctic signaling and survival)<br />
kit (2 if there were four in the Field) if we were four in the field or over water movements,<br />
our Guide had VHF radio and mobile telephone with as well), Fresh water, and emergency<br />
rations. The authorities were informed of the routes, and planned time of return. Return<br />
times were held. Party members moved in groups of 2. Weather was monitored constantly,<br />
with weather reports being viewed nightly, and the weather station readings monitored
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 141<br />
continuously, and reviewed for trends nightly. Weapons were handled in accordance with<br />
standard operating procedures submitted with the weapons permit request.<br />
6. SANITATION AND HYGIENE: Urination or defecation in the field was not done into<br />
waterways or water sources or within 50 m upland from them. Defecation was into bags and<br />
carried out (or burned) in accordance with permit.<br />
7. NAVIGATION: All points read with a XXXX Portable GPS Ser. Nr. XXXX, set to Datum<br />
XX and the XXXX coordinate system: Points read were plotted in with back azimuths onto<br />
the (topographic maps) or photos (set to the local declination) by the expedition leader, and<br />
controlled thereafter by the assistant expedition leader.<br />
8. CONTACT WITH WILDLIFE: (Unless permitted to do so) wildlife was avoided as were<br />
there trails. No contact or feeding of wildlife. Trash and waste handled appropriately to<br />
minimize risk for attracting wildlife or predator encounters.<br />
Successful field work is conducted following good planning. A good plan will include a definite<br />
course of action and define a method of execution. The plan will include a risk-analysis and<br />
measures to minimize risks, as well as a cost-benefit analysis. The planning process includes<br />
training in skills that might be perishable. Part of a successful expedition is good documentation<br />
upon return. This aids the team members who were not a part of the field team and can serve as a<br />
training aid for future teams. As with a laboratory log documenting experiments, the field report<br />
should be complete enough to reproduce the field work.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 142<br />
Appendix C Supplementary material
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 143<br />
This appendix contains papers produced relative to this thesis as where this author was first<br />
author or a co-author. The work done in this thesis was international, and involved many different<br />
scientific expertise. It is therefore appropriate to review the scientists, without whose efforts, much<br />
of this work could not be accomplished.<br />
The Relaxed Eddy Accumulation development was carried out under the total supervision of Dr.<br />
Henrik Skov at The National Environmental Research Institute of Denmark, Department of<br />
Atmospheric Environment, with subsequent development in Oak Ridge, USA at the National<br />
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion<br />
Division (ATDD), under the supervision of Dr.’s Tilden Meyers and Steve Brooks. Dr. Alex<br />
Guenther, US National Center for Atmospheric Research, NCAR, Boulder provided schematics<br />
photos and field advice for the NCAR REA system, during at a visit to NCAR.<br />
The RGM KCL coated annular denuder sampling system was tested prior to deployment at Oak<br />
Ridge National Laboratory, under the supervision and guidance of Dr. Steve Lindberg. Dr.<br />
Lindberg functioned as this Ph.D.’s overall external supervisor during the stay in Oak Ridge. The<br />
system was deployed at Walker Branch Research Area under the supervision of Dr. Lindberg, for<br />
testing prior to deployment to the NOAA Climate Monitoring and Data Laboratory, Barrow,<br />
Alaska.<br />
While in Alaska, the system was set up under the supervision of Dr. Brooks, and Denuder<br />
Analysis under supervision of Dr. Matt Landis, US Environmental Protection Agency. Dr. Robert<br />
Stevens, Florida Liaison to the US EPA, also advised in sampling system development and<br />
deployment in the United States and Alaska.<br />
Initial exposure to GEM and RGM sampling and flux measurement systems was during a visit to<br />
the Laboratory of Dr. Ralf Ebbinghaus, GKSS, Geesthacht, Germany. Annular denuder preparation<br />
and analysis was initially instructed by Dr. Weijin Dong, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 144<br />
comprehensively taught later by Dr. Landis and Stevens at US EPA National Exposure Laboratory,<br />
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Automatic RGM and total particulate mercury systems<br />
were learned from TEKRAN, Canada.<br />
Other aspects of elemental mercury sampling were learned initially from a course at the Swedish<br />
Environmental Research Institute, IVL, Göteberg, conducted by Dr’s John Munthe, and Ingevar<br />
Wangberg and comprehensively by Dr. Skov at NERI and through the experience gained in setting<br />
up, monitoring, maintaining and recovering, gaseous elemental mercury monitoring stations in the<br />
Faroe Islands, Station Nord, northeast Greenland and Nuuk, west Greenland. The sampling protocol<br />
employed was developed for MET Canada and provided by its authors, Ms. Sandy Steffen and Dr.<br />
W. Schroeder.<br />
The thermodynamics of the proposed mechanism for the oxidation of mercury in the Arctic is<br />
collaboratively developed with Professor John Plane, University of East Anglia and Henrik Skov,<br />
while at a research visit at the University of East Anglia.<br />
Peat research was carried out under the overall supervision of Professor W. Shotyk, formerly of<br />
the University of Berne, and presently at Heidelberg University. Mercury preparation and analyses<br />
were carried out at the University of Berne and the University of Heidelberg after comprehensive<br />
instruction from Dr. Fiona Roos-Barraclough. The idea for trying the bomb pulse in Greenland peat<br />
is credited to Professor Christian Lohse, University of Southern Denmark. Preparation of materials<br />
and radiocarbon dating and analyses were performed at the Danish National Radiocarbon AMS<br />
Laboratory, under the supervision of Professor Jan Heinemeier with additional guidance from<br />
Professor Emeritus Henrik Loft. Additional samples were analysed collaboratively at the University<br />
of Arizona National Science Foundation Radiocarbon AMS Laboratory with guidance from<br />
Professor emeritus Donahue and staff for their time and guidance. Stable lead isotope analyses were
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic 145<br />
carried out collaboratively by and after consultation with the Danish Isotope Centre, Professor<br />
Robert Frei.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 1: Goodsite, M.E., Brooks, S.B., Lindberg, S.E. Meyers, T.P Skov, H. and Larsen, M.R.B.<br />
(2003) The Fluxes of Reactive Gaseous Mercury measured with a newly developed method<br />
using Relaxed Eddy Accumulation. Submitted to Atmospheric Environment, June 2003.
Submitted to Atmospheric Environment<br />
The Fluxes of Reactive Gaseous Mercury Measured with a Newly Developed Method using<br />
Relaxed Eddy Accumulation<br />
<strong>Michael</strong> E. Goodsite a,b,d,e* , Henrik Skov a , Steve B. Brooks c , Steve E. Lindberg d , Tilden P.<br />
Meyers e , Matt Landis f , <strong>Michael</strong> R.B. Larsen a,e , Glen McConville g<br />
a National Environmental Research Institute, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark<br />
b Present address: MEG: Department of Chemistry University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55,<br />
5230 Odense M., Denmark<br />
c Oak Ridge Associated Universities, P.O. Box 117,<br />
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-0117<br />
d Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National<br />
Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6038<br />
e Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric<br />
Administration, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-0117<br />
f U.S. EPA, 79 TW Alexander Drive,<br />
Human Exposure Analysis Branch, MD-56,<br />
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711<br />
g CLIMATE MONITOR<strong>IN</strong>G AND DATA LABORATORY, National Oceanic and Atmospheric<br />
Administration,Barrow, Alaska<br />
*<br />
Corresponding author. Tel.: +45 65 50 25 57; fax: +45-<br />
65 50 12 14.<br />
E-mail address: meg@chem.sdu.dk (Mike Goodsite).<br />
1
Abstract<br />
2<br />
The conditional sampling or relaxed eddy accumulation, REA, technique represents the first<br />
opportunity to directly measure fluxes of the divalent, gaseous mercury compounds HgXY to the<br />
snowpack in the Arctic. Using a micrometeorological relaxed eddy accumulation system, with a<br />
heated sampling system specifically designed for Arctic use, the dry deposition of reactive gaseous<br />
mercury, RGM, is quantified for the first time after polar sunrise, in Barrow, Alaska. Heated KCl<br />
coated manual RGM annular denuders were used as the accumulators with an impactor, elutriator<br />
inlet allowing only fine (cut-off = 2.5 µm) particles to pass. At 3 m above the snow pack significant<br />
RGM fluxes measured during March 29 th – April 12 th 2000 were directed toward the snow surface.<br />
Overall mean flux was found to be - 0.4 ± 0.2 pg m -2 s -1 ; N=9, ± 1 SE, where the negative sign<br />
convention denotes deposition. Using measured total RGM concentrations; depositional velocities<br />
were then computed and averaged 1 cm s -1 .<br />
Keywords: Arctic; Conditional sampling; Divalent Gaseous Mercury; Emission; Snow–air<br />
exchange.
1. Introduction<br />
Mercury in the atmosphere, is approximately 95% in the gaseous elemental form (Slemr et al.,<br />
1985, Schroeder and Munthe, 1998). Its characteristics, such as low aqueous solubility, mean that it<br />
is relatively non reactive and stable and therefore has a long atmospheric residence time, enabling<br />
global transport.<br />
In 1998 Schroeder et al., reported on their 1995 discovery of the springtime depletion of<br />
tropospheric gaseous mercury in the high Canadian Arctic. This perennial phenomenon is since<br />
dubbed atmospheric mercury depletion episodes, AMDEs and has since been shown to be a polar<br />
and sub-polar phenomenon (Schroeder et al., 2003 and references therein). The mercury depleted<br />
from the atmosphere is oxidized to divalent gaseous mercury and exists during AMDEs in<br />
concentrations up to 900 pg m -3 (Lindberg et al., 2002, Skov et al. 2003). The divalent gaseous<br />
mercury species are operationally defined as reactive gaseous mercury, RGM, since the analytical<br />
methods, in this case, thermally desorbed KCL coated annular denuders (Landis et al., 2002) only<br />
allow quantification after reduction to gaseous elemental mercury. Therefore, any speciation<br />
information is lost.<br />
It is necessary to quantify the flux of RGM in Arctic areas and determine the depositional<br />
velocity in order to better understand the temporal, and spatial patterns of mercury deposition and<br />
accumulation in the Arctic, and gain an understanding of the chemical and dry depositional<br />
processes so that they might be applied to parameterization of atmospheric transport and deposition<br />
models and eventually policy decisions.<br />
The conditional sampling, or relaxed eddy accumulation technique (Businger and Oncley,<br />
1989) has been used to determine the flux of elemental gaseous mercury (Cobos et al., 2002). Their<br />
work thoroughly discusses the advantages of using a micrometeorological technique over other flux<br />
measurement methods. In this paper, RGM flux is determined with a relaxed eddy accumulation<br />
3
control system (Metsupport, Denmark) coupled with a RGM manual sampling system utilizing<br />
heated KCl coated annular denuders to capture RGM (Landis et al., 2002). This system uses heating<br />
mantles specifically built for Arctic use.<br />
2. Methods<br />
2.1 Study Site<br />
4<br />
Flux measurements were made in March – April, 2001 at the NOAA Climate Monitoring and<br />
Diagnostic Laboratory (CMDL) in Barrow, AK. Barrow is geographically the northern-most point<br />
in Alaska, located at 71°19’ N, 156°37’ W, and the CMDL is approximately 9 m above mean sea<br />
level, providing a very flat fetch for micrometeorological measurements. The air sampled at the<br />
station is characteristically part of the marine boundary layer during the sunlit hours. The Beaufort<br />
Sea was frozen, with periodic leads opening during the campaign. The weather was very stable, as<br />
expected for a high Arctic coastal area. A more detailed description of the study site is provided in<br />
Lindberg et al., 2002.<br />
2.2 RGM determination<br />
RGM was measured and analysed by the method developed by Landis et al. (2002), employing<br />
a KCl coated quartz annular denuder sampling chain heated to 50 0 C, to sample air. At the inlet,<br />
there is an elutriator and an impactor, with impactor plate. The elutriator accelerates the flow, by<br />
forcing it through an orifice onto a roughened, non-coated impactor plate. The cut-off diameter is<br />
2.5 µm, so only the fine fraction of particles flows through the denuder. The flow rate is 10 litres<br />
per minute and was controlled prior to and after sampling sampling with a “dry cal” flow meter<br />
prior attached just before the denuder sampling train.<br />
Denuders had a collocated precision of < 15.0 ± 9.3 % with 3x std. dev., in agreement with the<br />
findings reported in Landis et. al., 2002.
For all flux measurements, heating was kept constant, since the heat will affect the laminar flow<br />
within the denuder, the gas diffusion coefficient and the relative adherence of the gas to the KCl<br />
surface. The temperature was checked prior to and after measurement. The heating mantles<br />
employed are high temperature polyvinylchlorid, PVC, pipes, which allow a 2 cm airspace around<br />
the outside of the annular denuder, and enclose the denuder from the tip of the inlet to the top of a<br />
filter pack at the outlet. The outer portion of the pipe is wrapped with a silver tape to ensure heat<br />
transfer from self-regulating heat tape. The length of the heating tape is manufacturer and electrical<br />
voltage dependent, but is cut long enough to heat the air inside the tube to 50 o C and keep it at that<br />
temperature. From campaign experience, we found it necessary to improve the heating mantles to<br />
achieve 50 0 C. The original heating mantle assembly was placed inside a larger PVC pipe, allowing<br />
5 cm spacing between sidewalls, giving an overall diameter of approximately 9.6 cm. The space<br />
between the two shells was then filled with self-expanding polyurethane foam thermal insulation.<br />
After sampling, the denuders were taken into the laboratory for thermal desorption in<br />
accordance with Landis et al. 2002, using a TEKRAN 2537A mercury analyser, to quantify the<br />
RGM as Hg 0 .<br />
For all measurements a field blank was obtained by handling a denuder in the field. Hg mass<br />
from this field blank was subtracted from the measured Hg masses on the exposed denuders. If<br />
there was any indication of Hg(0) adsorption, then the denuder was cleaned and re-coated, since as<br />
pointed out by Sheu and Mason, 2001, just 1% of Hg(0) adsorption on a denuder is enough to<br />
compromise RGM measurements. All accuracies with the denuders were found to be in good<br />
agreement with those reported by Landis et al., 2002. In the Barrow 2001 campaign, the manual<br />
denuders exhibited a precision of 10%, based on co-located parallel measurements, and were on<br />
average within 25% of the automated RGM sampling system running separately and independently,<br />
on the roof of Barrow CMDL.<br />
5
2.3 The RGM REA system and flux measurement<br />
6<br />
Relaxed eddy accumulation, REA, is a micrometeorological method for trace gas flux<br />
determination. REA “relaxes” the requirement for instantaneous gas analysis by preferentially<br />
collecting air over time into some type of accumulator for up and down drafts, and all other air, the<br />
mid-channel. The trace gas in the collected sample is analysed after the sampling period.<br />
RGM flux measurements were performed from 29 March, 2001 through April 12, 2001, with<br />
the system set up at approximately 3 m above the snow pack surface on a guy-wire support of the<br />
NOAA, Barrow, CMDL tower, oriented into the prevailing winds, arriving from the Beaufort Sea.<br />
The measurements were made using a micrometeorological flux measurement system built by<br />
METSUPPORT aps, Denmark in January 2001 for this campaign. This system was coupled with<br />
the Landis et al., 2002 annular denuder method for measuring RGM, and the previously described<br />
heating caps, as the sampling front end. A similar METSUPPORT system and components have<br />
been previously deployed by NERI for measuring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and is<br />
described in detail in Christensen et al. 2000.<br />
The REA flux measurement system was set up on a steel rod affixed to the CMDL tower guy-<br />
line support pole with the head of the sonic anemometer facing into the predominant wind direction,<br />
and oriented towards North. The support beam was hung such that the heating caps and therefore<br />
inlets of the sampling system were perpendicular to, and 1 meter behind the centrum of the sonic<br />
head. The inlets were 1-2 mm longer than flush protruding from the bottom of the heating caps. The<br />
denuders for the up and down draft were co-located nearest the centre of the mast, while the parallel<br />
measurements or denuders sampling the air that is not coming either as down or up, were located<br />
near the edges of the mast. A quartz filter was kept in each of the filter packs, to ensure a constant<br />
pressure drop. Temperature in the heating caps was measured prior to and after sampling. From the<br />
quick connect at the top of the filter pack were connected 3.2 m long neoprene hoses into 3 fast
esponse switching valves supplied by MetSupport. From behind the switches, the three valves were<br />
connected into one sampling line using a simple 3 inlet manifold constructed with 2 T-type locking<br />
copper hose connectors in series and 1 L type locking hose connector as the end piece. Coming out<br />
of the manifold, a locking ball valve was used to adjust and fix the flow, as a back up to the mass<br />
flow controller. Between the pump and the valve, a Tylan mass flow controller was used to ensure a<br />
flow prior to the manifold of just over 10-litre min -1 , so that the flow was measured as 10-litre min -1<br />
at the denuder inlet. Pressure loss was minimal in the manifold and through the sampling lines.<br />
Once the system was running, the lag time from when the switch opened to when the flow started<br />
out the denuder was very small compared to the air sampling switching frequency of 1 Hz.<br />
Normally flux systems operate at air sampling switching rates of 10 Hz, switching as fast as the<br />
air flow is sampled with the sonic anemometer. The only lag time between the air and the switching<br />
comes from the software and physical switching process, including flow development in systems.<br />
Denuders are selective accumulators, that need a laminar flow in order to work properly. Given the<br />
geometry of the URG annular denuders, the 10 Hz sampling switching rate nominally allowed for<br />
full laminar flow development and escape of an air packet through the end of the annular denuder.<br />
Therefore the sampling switching rate was set in the REA system to 1 Hz with the 10 litre per<br />
minute flow rate maintained by a mass flow controller. The air sampling-switching rate is so long<br />
compared to errors that could be induced from physical switching and software, that these are<br />
considered negligible. By sampling at 1 Hz, we expect that approximately 95% of the turbulence is<br />
captured and the best compromise between the meteorological measurements and chemical<br />
sampling is obtained in order to ensure a laminar flow in the annular denuders and thereby measure<br />
RGM flux most accurately.<br />
Once RGM concentrations were obtained for the sampling period for each denuder channel, the<br />
surface flux F of RGM was calculated from equation 1.<br />
7
8<br />
F = βσv(C1-C3) (1),<br />
where β is an empirical coefficient, the “proportionality constant”, dependent on wind speed and<br />
turbulence, generally 0.6 for a fixed deadband and approximately 0.3 for a dynamic deadband, and<br />
calculated via the heat flux with the Metsupport system. σv is the standard deviation of the vertical<br />
wind velocity: both values are obtained directly as output from the REA system; C1 and C3 are the<br />
concentrations of RGM in upward and downward air masses, respectively.<br />
From the flux measurements the depositional velocity of RGM can be calculated if the ambient<br />
concentration for RGM is known:<br />
vd = F/C (2),<br />
where C is the concentration of RGM, and F is from 1.<br />
Due to the uncertainty of the concentration measurements in Barrow: 10 % and of the<br />
meteorological measurements, 10 % for β, σw for the Metsupport system (Christensen et al., 2000)<br />
the uncertainty on the flux measurements using the Landis et al. 2002, KCl coated annular denuder<br />
sampling end, heating caps and Metsupport REA system are estimated to be within 40% on a 95%<br />
confidence interval, though 20% would be a more conservative estimate of denuder precision, given<br />
the fact that flow at 10 lpm is not instantaneously developed, so there is necessarily some flow and<br />
turbulence information lost when switching at 1 Hz. This gives a conservative sampling error for<br />
flux as 50 % for the above system in Barrow.<br />
As a quality assurance check for the REA flux measurements, the total concentration of the<br />
three annular denuders for each run was compared with ambient concentration from a CMDL<br />
collocated automated RGM monitoring system described in Lindberg et al., 2002. Results were<br />
favourable, within 25% of each other on average.<br />
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 RGM flux measurements<br />
The results of the 2001 campaign in Alaska: Barrow Arctic Mercury Study (BAMS -2001) are<br />
shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1. The largest deposition velocity in 2001 was 2.7 cm s -1 and the average<br />
was close to 1 cm s -1 . Mean dry depositional flux was found to be - 0.4 ± 0.2 pg m -2 s -1 .<br />
Concentrations of the three denuder tubes, up, mid and down, were added together to determine the<br />
total concentration, and concentration was compared with the on site Tekran automatic RGM<br />
monitor, MODEL 1130, described in Lindberg et al., 2002 (Table 1).<br />
The machines were not running absolutely simultaneously so a linear interpretation was made<br />
to compare concentrations. Not taking run two into account, since a valve was frozen open, it is<br />
seen that the percent difference varies, with an average for the campaign of 24% with a standard<br />
deviation of 42%. The percent difference between the two measurements was between 3% and<br />
78%. This variance can be explained as a combination of the comparison method, the systems were<br />
not started or stopped simultaneously, and the oxidation of gaseous elemental mercury to RGM is<br />
dynamic, thus a linear extrapolation of concentration during a sampling period, is conservative. It is<br />
seen that in all but 2 of the runs, run 2 excluded, the RGM REA total is less than the TEKRAN<br />
1130 value, perhaps because of differences in the heating mantle system, but this observed bias<br />
could also be because of different flow calibration systems.<br />
The REA system when properly on the tower, after a period of time should report the same<br />
number of counts per up and down channel, due to conservation of mass, and did so when initially<br />
inventoried and tested during pre-deployment trials in Oak Ridge. In Barrow, there was always a<br />
greater number, up to 30% more, of counts on the down channel, suggesting that the sonic<br />
anemometer was not positioned properly, or a forcing of the turbulence. Therefore the channel<br />
count data was corrected to ensure mass conservation as follows:<br />
1) Corrected counts in Down = registered counts in Down - (registered counts in Down –<br />
corrected Down); where corrected counts in down = counts in up channel.<br />
9
Control: total counts for all channels registered = total counts with down corrected.<br />
2) Corrected Counts for Mid = registered Counts for Mid - (Registered Counts for Down -<br />
corrected counts for Down); The lost mass must be placed in mid for later concentration<br />
calculation.<br />
Control: Corrected counts Mid > registered counts mid, but total counts all channels still the same.<br />
3) Corrected Counts Up = Old Counts up Up<br />
4) New Total Volume for each denuder = New count * 10 l per second (fixed)<br />
Control: registered total Volume = Corrected total volume<br />
Control: registered total mass, RGM in ng Hg (0) = new total mass RGM, ng Hg (0).<br />
6) New concentration: New mass / New volume<br />
10<br />
Run dates and time, were reported as Greenwich Mean Time in accordance with the other<br />
monitors at CMDL Barrow. The sonic anemometer consistently showed an ambient temperature of<br />
2 degrees higher than other ambient temperature instruments at CMDL. This should not affect the<br />
measurements since the proportionality constant, β, is based on the heat flux.<br />
Table 2 shows other average data for the run, as recorded by the sonic anemometer. The clean<br />
air sector for NOAA, CMDL, Barrow, Alaska is defined as wind arriving from the coast, as<br />
opposed from the town of Barrow, and is 45 0 to 135 0 . The system was oriented to 360 0 .<br />
Due to the nature of micrometeorological measurements, the REA system works best at wind<br />
speeds near 5 m s -1 since there needs to be good turbulence to sample. Wind speeds less than 2 m s -1<br />
are nominal. During the campaign, the wind generally came from outside of the CMDL defined<br />
clean air sector. This means that during the measurements, the wind was uncharacteristically<br />
coming from the town of Barrow. The average standard deviation in the vertical wind component is<br />
0.29 with a standard deviation of 0.11. The proportionality constant averaged 0.41 with a standard<br />
deviation of 0.01. Indicating a stable heat flux. The REA system reported all numbers to four<br />
decimals; results have been rounded to two. Fig. 1, show that the average depositional velocity for<br />
reactive gaseous mercury is approximately 1 cm s -1 for the mass corrected data and approximately<br />
0.5 cm s -1 for the non-mass corrected data. Average depositional flux for Barrow was 1.3 ± 0.7 ng<br />
m -2 h -1 for the mass corrected and approximately half that for non-mass corrected values. For<br />
comparison purposes: Schroeder et al., 1998 used a dry depositional velocity of 0.5 cm s -1 when
estimating for Alert an average springtime dry-deposition flux for mercury of 2.5 ± 0.5 ng m -2 h -1<br />
based on their measurements of TGM. Comparing the flux with the average meteorological<br />
conditions in Table 2., gives no direct correlations. One would expect that emissions would increase<br />
as a function of the rising temperatures, but this can not said to be readily apparent. What seems to<br />
be apparent is that following a large depositional event; there is a small re-emission. This is<br />
probably the snow pack regaining equilibrium with the atmosphere.<br />
As seen in Fig. 1., the depositional velocities noted for depositional events are fast, around 2<br />
cm s -1 this is what would be expected for a very reactive gaseous species such as HNO3. On<br />
average, the depositional velocity is approximately 1 cm s -1 . Comparing with measured dry<br />
deposition velocities over snow for HNO3, reviewed in Karlson and Nyholm, 1998, show that the<br />
measured dry depositional velocities for RGM may be an order of magnitude higher than that for<br />
HNO3, given the snow surface temperature of < 2 0 C.<br />
3.2 Comparison of RGM flux with RGM ambient concentrations<br />
Fig. 2, are the monitored results RGM concentrations during the Barrow 2001flux measurement<br />
campaign. Comparing with Fig. 1., show that when there is a deposition recorded by the REA<br />
machine, there are correspondingly low RGM ambient values. The air has been apparently depleted<br />
of RGM due to deposition. Trends of RGM rising in the air on the 8 th , 9 th and 12 th of April are<br />
recorded by the REA system as reemission, perhaps indicating that RGM can be re-volatized from<br />
the snow surface.<br />
3.3 Drawbacks and other possible accumulators<br />
Stable weather conditions are the greatest drawback to deploying the RGM system in the Arctic<br />
for investigating mercury depletion events. Lu et al., 2001, summarize that the environmental<br />
conditions favouring mercury depletion events at high latitudes are: 1, marine/maritime location; 2,<br />
calm weather, low wind speeds, non-turbulent air flow; 3, the existence of a temperature inversion;<br />
11
4, sunlight and 5, sub-zero temperatures. Condition 2 implies poor operational characteristics for<br />
micrometeorological systems. We needed to compromise the sampling frequency to achieve<br />
laminar flow. We examined other RGM accumulators: three methods aside from annular denuders<br />
have been developed for measurement of RGM: refluxing mist chambers, ion-exchange membranes<br />
behind particulate filters and potassium chloride, KCl, coated tubular denuders (Landis et al., 2002<br />
and citations therein). However, only the annular denuder method by Landis et al., had the<br />
necessary characteristics of being able to operate under arctic conditions, with the flow dynamics<br />
essential for the REA flux measurements in this work.<br />
4. Conclusions<br />
12<br />
This work reports the first measurement series of RGM flux in the Arctic providing data for<br />
transport and depositional model parameterization. It shows that RGM is quickly deposited to the<br />
snow surface, however, there were also emissions, implying that there are processes in the snow<br />
surface capable of releasing RGM, or re-emitting the deposited RGM. The flux system takes<br />
advantage of already developed methods, to accumulate the RGM (Landis et al., 2002) and a<br />
micrometeorological method, REA, that has successfully been employed to measure gaseous<br />
elemental mercury flux (Cobos et al., 2002).<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
This work was carried out under basic NERI funding, as well as funding from the Danish<br />
Environmental Protection Agency, DANCEA program. MEG gratefully acknowledges the<br />
Copenhagen Global Change Initiative graduate research fellowship from the Danish Research<br />
Agency and NERI. He would like to thank NOAA, ATDD and ORNL, ESD for allowing him to be<br />
a visiting student and supporting his research, and to NOAA CMDL (Dan Endres), for support<br />
during the campaign.
References<br />
1. Businger J.A. and Oncley, S.P., (1990): Flux measurement with conditional sampling. Journal of<br />
Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 7, pp. 349–352.<br />
2. Christensen, C.S.; Hummelshoj, P.; Jensen, N. O.; Larsen, B.; Lohse, C.; Pilegaard, K.; Skov,<br />
H., (2000): Determination of the terpene flux from orange species and Norway spruce by<br />
relaxed eddy accumulation. Atmospheric Environment, 34(19), 3057-3067.<br />
3. Cobos, Douglas R.; Baker, John M.; Nater, Edward A., (2002): Conditional sampling for<br />
measuring mercury vapor fluxes. Atmospheric Environment, 36(27), 4309-4321.<br />
4. Karlsson, E., and Nyholm, S., (1998): Dry deposition and desorption of toxic gases to and from<br />
snow surfaces, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 227-245.<br />
5. Landis, M.S., Stevens, R.K., Schaedlich, F. and Prestbo, E.M., (2002): Development and<br />
characterization of an annular denuder methodology for the measurement of divalent<br />
inorganic reactive gaseous mercury in ambient air. Environmental Science and Technology<br />
36, pp. 3000–3009.<br />
6. Lindberg, S. E., Brooks, S., Lin, C. J., Scott, K. J., Landis, M. S., Stevens, R. K., Goodsite, M.<br />
and Richter, A. (2002): Dynamic oxidation of gaseous mercury in the Arctic troposphere at<br />
polar sunrise. Environmental Science & Technology 36, 1245-1256.<br />
7. Lu, J. Y., Schroeder, W. H., Barrie, L. A., Steffen, A., Welch, H. E., Martin, K., Lockhart, L.,<br />
Hunt, R. V., Boila, G. and Richter, A., (2001): Magnification of atmospheric mercury<br />
deposition to polar regions in springtime: the link to tropospheric ozone depletion chemistry.<br />
Geophysical Research Letters 28, 3219-3222.<br />
8. Oncley, Steven P.; Delany, Anthony C.; Horst, Thomas W.; Tans, Pieter P. Verification of flux<br />
measurement using relaxed eddy accumulation. Atmospheric Environment, Part A: General<br />
Topics (1993), 27A(15), 2417-26.<br />
9. Schroeder, W. H. and Munthe, J. (1998): Atmospheric Mercury - An Overview. Atmospheric<br />
Environment 32, 809-822.<br />
10. Schroeder, W. H., Anlauf, K. G., Barrie, L.A., Lu, J.Y. and Steffen, A. (1998): Arctic<br />
springtime depletion of mercury. Nature 394, 331-332.<br />
11. Schroeder, W. H., Steffen, A., Scott, K., Bender, T., Prestbo, E., Ebinghaus, R., Lu J. Y., and<br />
Lindberg, S. E., (2003): Summary report: first international Arctic atmospheric mercury<br />
research workshop, Atmospheric Environment, Volume 37, Issue 18, Pages 2551-2555.<br />
12. Sheu, G.P., and Mason, R.P., (2001): An Examination of Methods for the Measurements of<br />
Reactive Gaseous Mercury in the Atmosphere. Environmental Science and Technology, 35<br />
(6), 1209 -1216.<br />
13. Skov, H., Christensen, J., Goodsite, M.E., Heidam, N.Z., Jensen, B., Wåhlin, P., Geernaert, G.<br />
The Fate of Elemental Mercury in Arctic during Atmospheric Mercury Depletion Episodes<br />
and the Load of Atmospheric Mercury to Arctic. Submitted to Environmental Science and<br />
Technology, June 2003.<br />
14. Slemr, F., Schuster, G. and Seiler, W., (1985): Distribution, speciation and budget of<br />
atmospheric mercury. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 3, pp. 407–434.<br />
13
Figure captions<br />
Figure 1. Surface flux of RGM to the snow pack on a 3 m tower, at Barrow, Alaska, spring, 2001<br />
using REA. Sampling time approximately 4 hrs at midday. KCl coated annular denuder tubes, flow<br />
rate = 10 lpm (Landis et al., 2002) used as accumulators.<br />
Figure 2. RGM ambient concentrations monitored at CMDL during flux campaign period.<br />
14
Table captions<br />
Table 1. RGM mass raw data and accumulated concentrations corrected for blank values, 1130 are<br />
automatic RGM concentration measurements from the NOAA TEKRAN speciation unit, for<br />
comparison to REA total as % difference, run 2 not included in compared avg. and std. deviation.<br />
Table 2. Average temperature, wind speed, wind direction, standard deviation of the vertical wind<br />
velocity and the proportionality constant based on heat flux as reported by the sonic anemometer<br />
result file runname.txt. Temperature was 2 0 higher than what other on site instruments reported.<br />
Table 3. Results of REA RGM vertical flux measurements, Barrow, Alaska, 2001; with computed<br />
dry depositional velocities for RGM. Runs 1 and 7 are excluded due to outlying depositional<br />
velocities, indicating a problem with micrometeorological measurements. Run 2 is excluded since<br />
the mid-channel froze open, and the mass balance could therefore not be corrected. 11 excluded<br />
from average, since it is a nighttime run.<br />
15
Figures and Tables<br />
Figure 1.<br />
16<br />
RGM vertical flux (pg m-2 s-1) and<br />
Depositional Velocity of RGM cm/s<br />
1,5<br />
1,0<br />
0,5<br />
0,0<br />
-0,5<br />
-1,0<br />
-1,5<br />
-2,0<br />
-2,5<br />
-3,0<br />
-3,5<br />
02-apr<br />
04-apr<br />
RGM flux: BAMS 2001<br />
05-apr<br />
07-apr<br />
08-apr<br />
09-apr<br />
Date, average;<br />
error bars reflect 1 standard error<br />
10-apr<br />
12-apr<br />
Vertical Flux (Fc) (pg m^-2 s^-1)<br />
Depositional Velocity (Vd) cm s^-1<br />
Vertical flux without mass correction<br />
Depositional velocity without mass correction<br />
Average
Figure 2.<br />
RGM pg m-3<br />
350<br />
300<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
03-26<br />
00:00<br />
03-28<br />
00:00<br />
03-30<br />
00:00<br />
Automatic RGM measurements, Barrow 2001<br />
04-01<br />
00:00<br />
04-03<br />
00:00<br />
04-05<br />
00:00<br />
Date and time<br />
04-07<br />
00:00<br />
04-09<br />
00:00<br />
04-11<br />
00:00<br />
04-13<br />
00:00<br />
04-15<br />
00:00<br />
17
Table 1.<br />
18<br />
Date time group RGM mass (pg) Concentration Blank. Corrected (pg/m3)<br />
Run Dt/time(Z) Down mid up down mid up Total 1130 % difference<br />
1 29 2200-30 0100 MAR 29,3 15,3 12,3 67,7 19,0 33,7 121 126 4<br />
2 30 1800-30 2200 MAR 28,2 353,9 24,7 44,6 310,6 46,7 402 58 (-593)<br />
3 02 2000-03 0000 APR 31,0 23,7 21,0 39,9 23,2 42,2 105 93 -13<br />
4 04 2015-05 0015 APR 11,8 22,9 9,4 17,4 22,5 15,6 56 65 14<br />
5 05 1839-06 0039 APR 31,0 56,4 27,2 33,8 32,7 31,7 98 448 78<br />
6 07 1850-08 0050 APR 61,4 92,6 38,6 57,5 58,0 46,2 162 99 -64<br />
7 08 2030-09 0030 APR 25,5 24,6 13,7 33,5 23,8 27,0 84 172 51<br />
8 09 1804-10 0104 APR 44,8 68,1 35,9 35,9 36,2 36,9 109 335 67<br />
9 10 1839-10 2339 APR 29,9 41,7 22,7 33,5 30,3 36,1 100 166 40<br />
10 11 2000-12 0000 APR 27,1 34,8 16,4 39,8 32,8 29,4 102 121 16<br />
12 12 2100-13 0000 APR 26,7 41,8 21,4 31,2 30,0 32,8 94 97 3<br />
AVERAGE 31,5 70,5 22,1 39,5 56,3 34,4 24<br />
Std. Dev. 12,47 96,72 9,26 13,49 84,99 8,97 42<br />
11 (night) 12 0800-12 1100 APR 4,80 6,70 2,2 6,4 6,4 4,5 17 48 65
Table 2<br />
DAYHOURMON avg.temp avg.WS avg.Wdir In σv β<br />
Run Dt/time(Z) deg. C m/s deg Sector? average Average<br />
1 29 2200-30 0100 MAR -22,2 2,6 160 N 0,27 0,41<br />
2 30 1800-30 2200 MAR -22,6 5,5 132 Y 0,19 0,41<br />
3 02 2000-03 0000 APR -21,4 2,5 236 N 0,25 0,41<br />
4 04 2015-05 0015 APR -14,8 7,9 15 N 0,27 0,42<br />
5 05 1839-06 0039 APR -17,2 7,8 65 Y 0,26 0,41<br />
6 07 1850-08 0050 APR -9,3 5,9 93 Y 0,24 0,42<br />
7 08 2030-09 0030 APR -6,3 4,9 208 N 0,59 0,39<br />
8 09 1804-10 0104 APR -12,3 4,9 210 N 0,40 0,42<br />
9 10 1839-10 2339 APR -9,6 6,8 51 Y 0,27 0,41<br />
10 11 2000-12 0000 APR -8,8 5,2 41 N 0,18 0,42<br />
12 12 2100-13 0000 APR -8,5 3,3 247 N 0,25 0,41<br />
11<br />
0,11 0,42<br />
(night) 12 0800-12 1100 APR -8,7 2,7 36 N<br />
19
Table 3.<br />
Vertical Flux (Fc) Vd<br />
Run Nr. Date time GMT (pg m^-2 s^-1) ng/m2/hr m s^-1 cm s^-1<br />
20<br />
1 29 2200-30 0100 MAR -5,6 -20 -0,2 -15,7<br />
2 30 1800-30 2200 MAR 4,57 16,44 0,03 2,58<br />
3 02 2000-03 0000 APR -0,8 -2,8 0,0 -2,4<br />
4 04 2015-05 0015 APR -0,2 -0,6 0,0 -0,8<br />
5 05 1839-06 0039 APR -0,3 -0,9 0,0 -0,8<br />
6 07 1850-08 0050 APR -1,2 -4,3 0,0 -2,2<br />
7 08 2030-09 0030 APR -2,79 -10,05 -0,1 -10,06<br />
8 09 1804-10 0104 APR 0,2 0,7 0,0 0,6<br />
9 10 1839-10 2339 APR 0,1 0,4 0,0 0,4<br />
10 11 2000-12 0000 APR -1,0 -3,5 0,0 -2,8<br />
12 12 2100-13 0000 APR 0,2 0,6 0,0 0,6<br />
11 (night) 12 0800-12 1100 APR -0,08 -0,3 -0,01 -1,41<br />
Average Excl. 1,2,7,11 -0,4 -1,3 0,0 -0,9<br />
Std. Dev. Excl. 1,2,7,11 0,6 2,0 0,0 1,4
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 2: Lindberg, Steve E.; Brooks, Steve; Lin, C.-J.; Scott, Karen J.; Landis, Matthew S.;<br />
Stevens, Robert K.; Goodsite, Mike; Richter, Andreas. Dynamic Oxidation of Gaseous<br />
Mercury in the Arctic Troposphere at Polar Sunrise. Environmental Science and Technology<br />
(2002), 36(6), 1245-1256.
Dynamic Oxidation of Gaseous<br />
Mercury in the Arctic Troposphere<br />
at Polar Sunrise<br />
STEVE E. L<strong>IN</strong>DBERG*<br />
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National<br />
Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6038<br />
STEVE BROOKS<br />
Oak Ridge Associated Universities, P.O. Box 117,<br />
Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-0117<br />
C.-J. L<strong>IN</strong><br />
Department of Civil Engineering, P. O. Box 10024,<br />
Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas 77710<br />
KAREN J. SCOTT<br />
Department of Microbiology, University of Manitoba,<br />
Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada<br />
MAT<strong>THE</strong>W S. LANDIS<br />
U.S. EPA, 79 TW Alexander Drive,<br />
Human Exposure Analysis Branch, MD-56,<br />
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711<br />
ROBERT K. STEVENS<br />
Florida Department of Environmental Protection,<br />
2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399<br />
MIKE GOODSITE<br />
National Environmental Research Institute of Denmark,<br />
Copenhagen, Denmark<br />
ANDREAS RICHTER<br />
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen,<br />
D-28359 Bremen, Germany<br />
Gaseous elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) is a globally distributed<br />
air toxin with a long atmospheric residence time. Any<br />
process that reduces its atmospheric lifetime increases<br />
its potential accumulation in the biosphere. Our data from<br />
Barrow, AK, at 71° N show that rapid, photochemically<br />
driven oxidation of boundary-layer Hg 0 after polar sunrise,<br />
probably by reactive halogens, creates a rapidly depositing<br />
species of oxidized gaseous mercury in the remote Arctic<br />
troposphere at concentrations in excess of 900 pg m -3 .<br />
This mercury accumulates in the snowpack during polar<br />
spring at an accelerated rate in a form that is bioavailable<br />
to bacteria and is released with snowmelt during the<br />
summer emergence of the Arctic ecosystem. Evidence<br />
suggests that this is a recent phenomenon that may be<br />
occurring throughout the earth’s polar regions.<br />
Introduction<br />
Mercury has been targeted for global concern as a highly<br />
toxic contaminant. Exposures are thought to be increasing,<br />
* Corresponding author phone: (865)574-7857; fax: (865)576-8646;<br />
e-mail: Lindbergse@ornl.gov.<br />
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1245-1256<br />
especially among indigenous populations who consume fish<br />
and piscivorus species contaminated with methylmercury<br />
(1, 2), a neurotoxin that biomagnifies in aquatic food chains.<br />
Environmental mercury levels are known to be elevated in<br />
the Arctic, to generally increase with latitude, and to have<br />
increased over time (3, 4). Extensive wetlands exist in the<br />
Arctic (5), and such areas are now recognized as important<br />
sources of methylmercury (6).<br />
In addition to Hg 0 , somewhat lesser amounts of oxidized<br />
reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) species are now known to<br />
be emitted from industrial sources (7). RGM species are watersoluble,<br />
exhibit a much shorter atmospheric lifetime than<br />
Hg 0 , and their potential contribution to atmospheric deposition<br />
is widely recognized (8, 9). Although RGM compounds<br />
represent only a few percent of the overall gaseous mercury<br />
in typical ambient air, their dry deposition velocities and<br />
scavenging ratios exceed those of Hg 0 by more than an order<br />
of magnitude (8). Since industrial emissions of water-soluble<br />
RGM compounds are controllable to some extent (7), the<br />
demonstration of direct production of RGM in the atmosphere<br />
has profound implications on ecosystem and human<br />
exposure.<br />
The concept of global fugacity has been used to explain<br />
the condensation and accumulation of organic toxins in Arctic<br />
regions (10), but Hg 0 does not effectively “condense out”<br />
even at -50 °C. However, other forms of airborne Hg,<br />
especially oxidized Hg, might strongly partition from gas to<br />
solid phases at low temperatures (11). Recent reports of<br />
ground-level ozone (O3) and Hg 0 depletions at Alert in the<br />
Canadian High Arctic (∼82° N) provided the first evidence<br />
that conditions may exist in the upper Arctic following polar<br />
sunrise that promote depletion of airborne Hg 0 (12). Unlike<br />
O3, which is chemically destroyed, Hg only changes its<br />
oxidation state, and depletion from the airmass implies<br />
accumulation elsewhere. While the original Alert study did<br />
not include measurements of the fate of the depleted Hg, a<br />
recent paper reports elevated levels of Hg in snow throughout<br />
the Canadian Arctic (13). The characterization of the associated<br />
Hg species and their ultimate fate in the Arctic<br />
ecosystem is critical to our understanding of mercury<br />
depletion events (MDEs).<br />
In 1998, we initiated Hg 0 measurements as part of the<br />
Barrow Arctic Mercury Study (BAMS; 14) to determine the<br />
geographic extent and reaction mechanism of MDEs. In 1999,<br />
we added the first semi-continuous measurements of RGM<br />
in the Arctic and measured both species during and after<br />
polar sunrise through June 2001. In an intensive campaign<br />
during April-June 2001, we also collected particulate Hg (Hgp)<br />
samples at Barrow, aircraft measurements of RGM, and<br />
aerodynamic measurements of RGM fluxes over snow. We<br />
report here the first detailed analysis of the BAMS data and<br />
demonstrate that Hg 0 is being “depleted” as a result of in-air<br />
oxidation reactions that produce some form of oxidized<br />
gaseous mercury that is rapidly deposited to the snow surface<br />
at Barrow.<br />
Methods<br />
Study Site. All of the data reported here were collected at the<br />
NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostic Laboratory (CMDL)<br />
in Barrow, AK. There are no Hg sources within the CMDL,<br />
no emission points on the roof where our intakes were<br />
located, nor any known major Hg point sources in the town<br />
of Barrow, which is located ∼10 km southwest of the CMDL.<br />
Prevailing winds are from the northeast across the Beaufort<br />
Sea. The CMDL is located near the peninsula at Point Barrow,<br />
∼2 km from the shoreline, and is surrounded primarily by<br />
10.1021/es0111941 CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 1245<br />
Published on Web 02/13/2002
FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of the sample flow path in the automated Tekran model 2537A Hg 0 analyzer with the 1130 gaseous speciation<br />
denuder module and 1135 particulate Hg pyrolysis unit.<br />
water to the north, east, and west. Barrow is geographically<br />
the northern-most point in Alaska, located at 71°19′ N, 156°37′<br />
W, and the CMDL is ∼9 m above mean sea level. In latitude,<br />
Barrow is ∼1600 km south of Alert. We initiated atmospheric<br />
Hg sampling at Barrow in September 1998 and began<br />
additional parallel sampling of speciated Hg in air 1 yr later<br />
using the methods described below. These measurements<br />
will continue through at least 2003. We also collected fresh<br />
surface snow and snow cores for Hg analysis from the tundra<br />
in the CMDL clean air sector during 2000 and 2001. Particulate<br />
Hg, eddy flux, and aircraft Hg measurements were added<br />
during the intensive BAMS-2001 campaign in March-June<br />
2001 at the Barrow lab. Ancillary data available at the CMDL<br />
include routine meteorological data and trace gases such as<br />
ozone (15).<br />
Sampling and Analytical Approaches. Atmospheric Hg 0<br />
was determined using a Tekran 2537A vapor-phase mercury<br />
analyzer. Descriptions of the Tekran and its operating<br />
parameters have been published (16), and it has been the<br />
subject of a number of intercomparison studies (17-19).<br />
The 2537A instrument utilizes two parallel solid gold traps<br />
to preconcentrate Hg 0 that is subsequently thermally desorbed<br />
into a cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometer<br />
(20). The instrument was configured to sample at a 5-min<br />
time resolution using a heated Teflon inlet line mounted ∼5<br />
m above the ground on a mast ∼1 m above the roof of the<br />
NOAA CMDL building. The insulated sampling line was<br />
maintained at 50 °C by a PID temperature controller.<br />
Atmospheric Hg speciation was determined by integrating<br />
a Tekran 1130 speciation unit with the Tekran 2537A. The<br />
model 1130 speciation unit consists of a heated denuder<br />
module, a pump module, and a controller module. The model<br />
1130 controller module integrates the analytical capabilities<br />
of the Tekran model 2537A unit with the 1130 speciation<br />
module allowing for continuous measurement of both Hg 0<br />
1246 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002<br />
and RGM at pg m-3 concentrations. The 1130 speciation unit<br />
was configured to collect 2-h RGM samples onto a KCl-coated<br />
quartz annular denuder at a 10 L/min flow rate. During the<br />
2-h sampling period, 5-min Hg0 samples were continuously<br />
quantified by the 2537A analyzer. After the 2-h sampling<br />
period, the 1130 system was flushed with Hg-free air, and<br />
the annular denuder was heated to 500 °C. The RGM collected<br />
on the denuder was thermally decomposed into a Hg-free<br />
airstream and subsequently analyzed as Hg0 . The denuders<br />
collect oxidized reactive gaseous mercury compounds with<br />
a diffusion coefficient >0.1 cm2 /s that readily adhere to a<br />
KCl coating at 50 °C (21). The most probable candidate<br />
compounds are HgCl2 and HgBr2; HgO is less likely. In this<br />
configuration, the fine particulate phase mercury (Hg-p; e2.5<br />
µm) that passes the impactor inlet was collected on a<br />
downstream quartz fiber filter but was not analyzed.<br />
For 3 months during the BAMS-2001 spring intensive<br />
campaign, our EPA colleagues deployed additional mercury<br />
monitoring equipment to allow separate quantification of<br />
Hg0 , RGM, and also Hg-p. The equipment included a Tekran<br />
2537A/1130 configuration described above with the addition<br />
of a prototype Tekran 1135 particulate pyrolysis unit. One of<br />
the greatest problems with conventional Hg-p measurement<br />
methods is that RGM has been shown to adsorb to filter<br />
media and previously collected aerosols. This can result in<br />
large and variable measurement artifacts (21). The Tekran<br />
1130/1135 speciation system avoids this problem by collecting<br />
RGM prior to collecting the Hg-p onto a quartz fiber<br />
filter. The quartz filter and quartz denuder components were<br />
sequentially desorbed during the analysis phase at 500 and<br />
650 °C, respectively. During the filter heating step, the<br />
pyrolyzer was maintained at 650 °C to ensure complete<br />
decomposition of all Hg-p compounds evolved during the<br />
filter temperature ramp-up to Hg0 . Figure 1 shows a schematic<br />
of the flow path for the overall 1130/1135 system as integrated
with the 2537A. During desorption, the sampling system was<br />
flooded with zero air to eliminate background air and achieve<br />
good analysis blanks. This zero air also acts as the carrier gas<br />
during subsequent analysis steps. The pyrolyzer for the quartz<br />
regenerable filter was preheated to convert to elemental form<br />
any mercury compounds that are eluted during subsequent<br />
steps. As the regenerable particulate trap was heated, the<br />
particle-bound mercury captured on the trap was desorbed<br />
and quantified by the Tekran 2537A. The heating process<br />
also reconditioned the trap for subsequent cycles. After<br />
desorption was complete, the entire sampling train was<br />
cooled to 50 °C. After being cooled, the denuder and<br />
particulate trap were ready for another measurement cycle.<br />
Atmospheric Hg fluxes were quantified during the BAMS-<br />
2001 intensive by deployment of a relaxed eddy accumulation<br />
(REA) system developed for RGM. The Danish REA system<br />
uses a METEK sonic anemometer coupled with three heated<br />
manual RGM denuders and filter packs (22). The basis of the<br />
REA logging and control system used is as described in the<br />
literature (23). The system was operated over the snow during<br />
April 2001 to collect 12 4-h samples at a 10 L/min flow rate<br />
and a switching frequency of 1 Hz to quantify the RGM<br />
concentrations in the upflow and downflow eddies and a<br />
deadband (we realize that there is decreased resolution of<br />
the turbulence at 1 Hz; however, we feel that the data<br />
represent a general trend and are in good agreement with<br />
fluxes calculated based on the constant sampling during the<br />
same time periods). The vertical flux was calculated as<br />
described in ref 24: F ) σW(C_up - C_down)�, where σW is<br />
SD (vertical wind speed), � is a proportionality constant (both<br />
measured in real time), and C_up - C_down is the direct<br />
difference in concentration between the upflow and downflow<br />
denuders for each period. The denuders were analyzed<br />
manually as described in refs 22 and 25, a method based on<br />
the automated approach described above. Development<br />
continues on the REA system to increase the sampling<br />
frequency and maintain a constant laminar flow in the<br />
denuders.<br />
Surface snow samples (upper 10 cm) were collected in<br />
acid-washed Teflon bottles and maintained frozen until<br />
analysis. Subsurface samples were similarly collected from<br />
the freshly exposed snowpack face. Snowmelt runoff was<br />
collected in prefired Pyrex bottles with Teflon caps. Total<br />
Hg and methylmercury analyses were performed at Flett<br />
Research Ltd. (Winnipeg, MB) and at ORNL using cold vapor<br />
atomic fluorescence spectrophotometry (26). Assays for<br />
bioavailable mercury (bioHg) were performed on a number<br />
of snow samples using mer-lux bioreporters, genetically<br />
engineered bacteria that produce light when divalent inorganic<br />
mercury enters their cells (27). Samples were melted<br />
in the dark and analyzed immediately. Sample preparation<br />
was done in a Class 100 laminar flow hood in a HEPA-filtered<br />
Hg clean lab at the Freshwater Institute (Winnipeg, MB).<br />
The general assay method employed was as described in ref<br />
27 with the following modifications: Vibrio anguillarum was<br />
the host species, not Escherichia coli; cells were grown in<br />
Glucose Minimal Medium; the assay medium was modified<br />
to include 5 mM glucose and 18 mM (NH4)2SO4; in addition,<br />
3 mM sodium/potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6), used to<br />
wash and resuspend the mer-lux cells, was added to the<br />
sample in the final cell suspension. The specific growth<br />
requirements and cell preparation of V. anguillarum are<br />
described in ref 28. The primary Hg standard used was a<br />
1 µgmL -1 Hg(NO3)2 solution prepared by Flett Research Ltd.<br />
(Winnipeg, MB). Light production was measured with a Beckman<br />
LS 6500 scintillation counter in noncoincidental mode.<br />
Maps of BrO distribution in the total column were<br />
generated from GOME satellite data (Global Ozone Monitoring<br />
Experiment). GOME is a 4-channel UV/visible grating<br />
spectrometer on board the ESA satellite ERS-2. GOME<br />
radiances and irradiances were used with a published<br />
algorithm (29) to derive total column BrO. GOME measurements<br />
do not yield profile information but reflect the BrO<br />
distribution throughout the column. Since stratospheric BrO<br />
(which mainly depends on photolysis of the reservoirs and<br />
total stratospheric BrY) is relatively constant with time and<br />
shows little spatial variation, as supported by model calculations<br />
and ground-based observations of stratospheric BrO<br />
(29), the BrO plots show mainly the boundary-layer variations<br />
plus a more or less constant offset. This idea is supported<br />
by enhanced boundary-layer BrO observed independently<br />
at other polar sites using ground-based instruments that<br />
match with enhanced BrO values in the GOME data (30).<br />
Quality Assurance Activities. At Barrow, the Tekran 2537A<br />
routinely undergoes automated periodic recalibrations daily<br />
using an internal permeation source. Two-point calibrations<br />
(zero and span) are performed separately for each cartridge.<br />
A Commercial permeation tube (VICI Metronics) provides<br />
approximately 1 pg/s at +50.0 °C. Since it is not practical to<br />
certify these low rates gravimetrically, manual injections were<br />
used in our home lab before shipment to Barrow to initially<br />
calibrate the tube against a saturated mercury vapor standard<br />
(16, 31). Since then, this procedure has been repeated once<br />
or twice annually. The adjustment for perm tube drift has<br />
been on the order of 1-2% per year. During routine<br />
operations at Barrow, the Tekran was also subject to periodic<br />
zero checks and spikes of ambient air with a known amount<br />
of Hg 0 . During 1999, we performed spikes and zero checks<br />
every 25 h using an automated system that externally<br />
controlled the perm source to deliver 16 pg of Hg 0 into the<br />
Teflon sampling line. Over the year, spike recoveries ranged<br />
from 85 to 114% and averaged 102 ( 3% recovery. There was<br />
no significant difference in recovery during the MDE period<br />
as compared to the rest of the year. Zero checks were<br />
consistently at the detection limit (0.09 ( 0.01 ng/m 3 ).<br />
Although the 1130 RGM speciation system does not yet<br />
include a direct calibration method with known amounts of<br />
RGM, all analyses are performed with the 2537A after thermal<br />
desorption and conversion of the RGM to Hg 0 , a process<br />
demonstrated to be quantitative with an efficiency of 100%<br />
(21). Field intercomparisons of paired 1130 instruments<br />
performed elsewhere over a range of RGM from ∼20 to 400<br />
pg m -3 showed that the denuder method exhibits good<br />
precision (( 15%) and that no significant RGM breakthrough<br />
occurs for the 2-h denuder samples collected over the RGM<br />
concentration range seen at Barrow (21). We also performed<br />
an intercomparison for RGM in Barrow using the Tekran<br />
1130 automated denuder operated adjacent to a manual<br />
quartz annular denuder of similar design (21). During May<br />
1-6, 2000, these systems were operated simultaneously on<br />
the roof of the Barrow CMDL to collect six sets of replicate<br />
samples. The Tekran 1130 denuder was analyzed as described<br />
above, while the manual denuders were thermally desorbed<br />
in a tube furnace, and the exhaust gas was directed into a<br />
second 2537A for an independent analysis of desorbed Hg<br />
(21, 25). Five of the six replicates gave excellent results; the<br />
data were well correlated (r 2 ) 0.91), and the means were<br />
within ∼5% (Tekran ) 108 ( 23 pg/m 3 , manual ) 115 ( 24<br />
pg/m 3 ). One set differed by a factor of 2 (manual lower), but<br />
RGM was increasing rapidly during this period, and the two<br />
samples were slightly offset in time.<br />
During the REA flux measurements, the total concentration<br />
of the three denuder tubes for each run compared<br />
favorably with a collocated manual denuder sampling system<br />
as a QA check. On the basis of parallel measurements in the<br />
lab and field study, the manual denuders exhibit a precision<br />
of 10%, which infers a sampling error of 40% (95% confidence<br />
level) for the RGM flux determined by the REA system, given<br />
an allowed 10% error in the micrometeorological determinations<br />
of � and σw (23). Flow in the denuders was set by a<br />
VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 1247
mass flow controller to 10 L/min and controlled prior to and<br />
after each measurement. However, because of flow development<br />
during switching, a more cautious number for the REA<br />
system would be a denuder precision of 20%, thus giving a<br />
sampling error for flux as determined by the REA system of<br />
∼60% (95% confidence level; 22).<br />
Approximately half of the Barrow snow samples were split<br />
and analyzed in duplicate by each analytical lab with good<br />
agreement ((15%). Assays for bioavailable mercury (bioHg)<br />
in snow samples were routinely run in replicate with a<br />
precision on the order of 5-10%.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
Dynamics and Chemistry of Depletion Events. The 1999<br />
data (Figure 2) provide the first confirmation of MDEs at this<br />
more southerly Arctic site (Barrow is ∼1600 km south of Alert),<br />
and the 2000 data show that RGM is produced during MDEs<br />
(Figure 3). The early 2001 data exhibit comparable trends.<br />
This is the first evidence that the MDEs could be a widespread<br />
phenomenon of Arctic dawn and that RGM only appears at<br />
significant levels when Hg 0 is being depleted. Although others<br />
have suggested that the depleted Hg 0 at Alert accumulates<br />
in the aerosol-phase Hg (12), our data clearly indicate an<br />
important change in gaseous speciation during MDEs,<br />
producing levels of RGM unprecedented at remote and rural<br />
sites (8, 18, 25).<br />
Depletion events begin within a few days of polar sunrise<br />
(late January) and persist until snowmelt (early June, Figure<br />
2), suggesting a role of both sunlight and frozen surfaces.<br />
During this period, Hg 0 exhibits a strong correlation with O3<br />
(e.g., r 2 ) 0.76 for the period graphed) as also seen at Alert<br />
(12). Surface O3 destruction is a common feature at Barrow<br />
during Arctic spring (15). There is no correlation between O3<br />
and Hg 0 in the months before polar sunrise (r 2 < 0.1).<br />
Gaseous and aerosol Br also exhibit strong seasonal cycles<br />
at Barrow and, like RGM, peak annually between January<br />
and June (32). During this period, aerosol Br increases nearly<br />
20-fold over typical concentrations and can exceed 100 ng<br />
m -3 . Hypotheses for the sources of this Br include aerosol<br />
enrichment by bubble bursting from the sea-surface microlayer,<br />
gaseous reactions resulting from organic Br emissions<br />
from marine algae (e.g., bromoform is thought to be<br />
emitted by ice algae), and/or other aerosol-related reactions.<br />
The most probable mechanism involves heterogeneous<br />
reactions at the interface of hygroscopic sea-salt aerosols<br />
(15), many of which are initiated in the surface microlayer<br />
of snowflakes or the snowpack (33). Several gaseous reactive<br />
halogen species (e.g., BrO, see Figure 2) may result with the<br />
potential to oxidize Hg 0 to gaseous Hg(II) (RGM) compounds.<br />
Many of these halogen compounds exhibit a strong diel<br />
pattern (e.g., BrO, ClO, Br, and Cl), indicating the importance<br />
of sunlight and photochemical reactions (34), as reflected in<br />
the diel cycle of the airborne Hg species. Our data indicate<br />
that peak RGM production and Hg 0 depletion generally occur<br />
at midday under maximum UV (Figure 4).<br />
We hypothesize that RGM is formed through a rapid,<br />
in-situ oxidation of Hg 0 in the gaseous phase during MDEs.<br />
Production of RGM may be attributed to the same photochemically<br />
active halogen species involved in surface O3<br />
destruction (15), suggesting that the overall process is<br />
heterogeneous. On the basis of reported halogen activation<br />
mechanisms in the remote marine boundary layer<br />
(34-39), we propose the physicochemical pathways conceptualized<br />
in Figure 5 for our observation of RGM during<br />
MDEs. In the reaction mechanism, bromine and chlorine<br />
radicals are produced autocatalytically from a heterogeneous<br />
photochemical mechanism involving sea-salt aerosol.<br />
The halogen radicals (Br/Cl) and halogen oxide radicals (BrO,<br />
ClO) produced from the ozone destruction reaction (reaction<br />
1) exhibit strong diurnal patterns with solar radiation (34,<br />
1248 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002<br />
36) and serve as the primary oxidants that produce RGM<br />
(Figure 5):<br />
and/or<br />
Br/Cl + O 3 f ClO/BrO + O 2<br />
BrO/ClO + Hg 0 f HgO + Br • /Cl •<br />
Hg 0 + 2Br • /Cl • f HgBr 2 /HgCl 2<br />
These proposed mechanisms are plausible for the excellent<br />
correlation between Hg 0 and O3 concentrations during MDEs.<br />
There are other reactive halogen species present in the<br />
Arctic that are thermodynamically favorable in oxidizing Hg 0<br />
to form RGM in the gaseous phase, including Cl2,Br2, HOCl,<br />
HOBr, and BrCl. However, we feel that molecular Cl2, Br2,<br />
and BrCl are not likely to cause the in-situ RGM formation<br />
seen here as they can be rapidly photolyzed under sunlit<br />
conditions (34-36). HOCl and HOBr are more resistant to<br />
solar irradiation. However, since they do not exhibit a strong<br />
diel cycle in the remote marine boundary layer (35-38), they<br />
may not account for the observed RGM at Barrow. Figure 5<br />
identifies two RGM species as proposed products: mercury<br />
oxide (HgO) and mercury halides (HgBr2/HgCl2). Considering<br />
the extremely low concentration of all reacting species (both<br />
Hg 0 and reactive halogen), the bimolecular oxidation of Hg 0<br />
by halogen oxide would be the favorable RGM formation<br />
pathway, yielding HgO as the product. However, since the<br />
denuders may preferentially collect HgBr2/HgCl2 over HgO<br />
(21), there may also be a significant contribution from halogen<br />
radicals in the trimolecular oxidation of Hg 0 . On the basis of<br />
published studies of reactive halogens in the Arctic (15, 32-<br />
40), HgBr2 should be favored. Research to determine the<br />
predominant species of RGM at Barrow continues.<br />
The reaction scheme in Figure 5 explains the strong Hg/<br />
O3 correlation and also the extreme seasonality of MDEs:<br />
the depletions of O3 and Hg 0 require both sunlight and a<br />
frozen aerosol or snow surface. The reactive halogens are<br />
initiated by the production of HOBr (or HOCl) from hydroxyl<br />
radical reactions with Br - (or Cl - ), which are highly concentrated<br />
in the surface layer of a frozen water droplet or<br />
snow crystal (40). The abrupt end of the MDEs precisely at<br />
snowmelt suggests that these reactions do not proceed when<br />
the droplets deliquesce, decreasing the surface Br - and Cl -<br />
concentrations as the droplets become homogeneously<br />
mixed (Figure 5).<br />
Meteorological factors strongly influence the extreme<br />
levels of RGM measured at Barrow. We developed a simple<br />
predictive model for airborne Hg depletion and dry deposition<br />
to snowpack using local meteorological data and an<br />
inverse boundary-layer approach (41). Taken together,<br />
boundary-layer entrainment rates and deposition velocities<br />
(both modeled as a function of wind speed, UV-B, and air<br />
temperature) explained ∼70% and ∼80% of the measured<br />
variance in airborne Hg 0 and RGM, respectively. The highest<br />
RGM concentrations consistently occurred during periods<br />
of reduced wind speed and maximum UV-B. Elevated RGM<br />
also coincided with periods characterized by increased levels<br />
of BrO in the vicinity of Barrow (e.g., Figure 2). These<br />
conditions often follow periods of elevated wave activity and<br />
sea-salt aerosol generation. For example, an extensive area<br />
of elevated BrO occurred on March 29, 2000, when the<br />
Beaufort gyre had opened a series of leads north of Barrow.<br />
Under these conditions, RGM reached 900-950 pg/m 3 (e.g.,<br />
Figure 3, days 91 and 138-148), levels that exceed those<br />
measured near industrial point sources (8, 42). Even the<br />
average daytime RGM of 180 pg m -3 at Barrow during March-<br />
May is several times higher than typical event levels at rural<br />
sites (8, 25).<br />
(1)<br />
(2)<br />
(3)
FIGURE 2. Trends in Hg 0 at Barrow during 1999, showing a strong correlation between Hg 0 and O3 depletions, and development of a zone<br />
of elevated BrO near Barrow during this period (mean vertical column BrO is expressed as molecule cm -2 , derived from GOME satellite<br />
data).<br />
VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 1249
FIGURE 3. Trends in Hg 0 (upper plot) and reactive gaseous mercury (lower) at Barrow during 2000, showing parallel behavior in total<br />
Hg in the surface snowpack (lower) and mean daily UV-B (lower).<br />
Fate of RGM and Dynamics of Hg in Snow. RGM is formed<br />
continuously as long as O3 and reactive Br are present during<br />
polar spring, and the observed air concentrations reflect the<br />
dynamic balance between formation and deposition. Integrating<br />
the data in Figure 4 suggests that ∼30-40% of the<br />
depleted Hg 0 appears as airborne RGM and that the<br />
remainder is deposited to the snow surface directly as RGM<br />
and/or is scavenged by fine aerosols. Our inverse boundarylayer<br />
model of the local sink strength (41) predicted Hg<br />
deposition fluxes of ∼40 µgm -2 at Barrow during February-<br />
May 1999 and ∼55 µgm -2 during January-May 2000. These<br />
estimated 5-month fluxes are much higher than annual wet<br />
deposition rates measured in the northeastern United States<br />
(∼5-15 µg m -2 yr -1 ; 9) and can be supported only by direct<br />
deposition of RGM since submicron aerosols are subject to<br />
far less local deposition than is RGM (8).<br />
Our year 2000 snow chemistry data confirm these modeled<br />
rates of Hg accumulation (Figure 3). The measured Hg<br />
concentrations in the snowpack and calculated snowpack<br />
depth (86 cm) prior to melt in 2000 (assuming a 70% water<br />
1250 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002<br />
equivalency) yield an estimated average flux of ∼50-60 µg<br />
m -2 . This flux is reflected in total Hg in snow, which increased<br />
steadily from 90 ng/L over this period (Figure 3).<br />
Such dramatic increases have not been seen in snow from<br />
lower latitudes (43), but 1998 data from a ship frozen in the<br />
Beaufort Sea 550 km north of Barrow showed similar temporal<br />
trends in surface snow (although at lower concentrations;<br />
44), suggesting that this phenomenon should be investigated<br />
at higher latitudes. These concentrations of Hg in the May<br />
snowpack are not only unprecedented for non-Arctic remote<br />
sites but also exceed typical levels near industrialized regions<br />
(9, 43).<br />
The fraction of the total Hg pool in snow that was<br />
biologically available to bacteria (bioavailable mercury) was<br />
determined using the mer-lux bioreporter V. anguillarum<br />
pRB28 and its constitutive control V. anguillarum pRB27.<br />
The mer-lux bioreporters are genetically engineered bacteria<br />
that produce light when divalent inorganic mercury (Hg(II))<br />
enters their cells (27), thereby distinguishing biologically labile<br />
from biologically inert Hg(II) species that do not enter the
FIGURE 4. Typical diel cycle of tropospheric gaseous Hg species<br />
and UV-B at Barrow (UV is measured in near-realtime, while Hg 0<br />
and RGM represent integrated samples of 5 min and 2 h, respectively,<br />
as described in the text).<br />
FIGURE 5. Conceptual diagram of proposed Hg 0 oxidation reaction<br />
sequences in the Arctic at Barrow. As explained in the text, there<br />
are several possible pathways and products. This schematic presents<br />
those that appear most favorable given the observations (dashed<br />
lines represent inter-phase transport; solid lines are reaction<br />
pathways).<br />
bacterial cell. This measurement is of interest because<br />
microorganisms play an important role in the transformation<br />
of Hg(II) in the environment (6). In January (2000), prior to<br />
polar sunrise, bioavailable Hg(II) was undetectable in Barrow<br />
snow. It then increased from 0.22 ng/L (∼1% of total Hg) in<br />
March to 8.8 ng/L (nearly 13% of the total Hg) in May. Prior<br />
to this study, bioavailable Hg(II) had never been measured<br />
in the Arctic. However, concentrations in snow and precipitation<br />
in a remote Boreal site in northern Canada were<br />
on average
FIGURE 6. Trends in several Hg species in the atmosphere and in the snowpack at Barrow around the period of annual snowmelt [during<br />
the June 4-10, 2000, snowmelt (days 156-162), slushy snow was collected from atop the frozen snowpack for analysis]. Inset photographs<br />
show the conditions of the snowpack at midday, sky conditions, and mean daily air temperature.<br />
may be responsible for creating Hg-p as compared to RGM<br />
and that the Hg-p produced at night is photosensitive. One<br />
candidate reaction would involve aerosol-bound BrCl that<br />
would readily oxidize any sorbed Hg 0 but that is rapidly<br />
decomposed under sunlight (36). However, upon the advent<br />
of 24-h sunlight in mid-May, the Hg-p/RGM ratio dropped<br />
to ∼0.1, and the two species were now positively correlated<br />
(48). The authors speculate that the Hg-p detected after 24-h<br />
sun reflects RGM sorbed onto the existing aerosol. These<br />
observations may help explain why the air at Alert appears<br />
to be characterized by a larger Hg-p/RGM ratio than at Barrow<br />
(13). The surface reactivity of airborne RGM suggests that it<br />
would readily partition to the aerosol phase upon formation.<br />
Hence, Hg-p/RGM ratios may be useful indicators of the age<br />
(time since oxidation of Hg 0 ), and hence transport distance,<br />
of depleted air masses. As noted here, our data suggest that<br />
at least some RGM is being formed in situ at ground level<br />
at the Barrow site, while Hg 0 in the air sampled at Alert may<br />
have undergone significant depletion/oxidation events over<br />
the sea ice prior to being sampled at the Alert station.<br />
To determine the vertical extent of RGM formation, upper<br />
air RGM was sampled with heated RGM denuders attached<br />
to the outer strut of a Cessna 207 and to a mass flow meter/<br />
vacuum pump system. Two successive 1-h midday flights<br />
were conducted on three separate days in late March and<br />
early April at 1000 m (exterior to the boundary layer) and 100<br />
m altitude (within the boundary layer) immediately northeast<br />
of Point Barrow (48). The six aircraft surveys consistently<br />
showed that RGM exists primarily in ground-level air below<br />
1252 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002<br />
the marine boundary layer (concentrations decreased from<br />
an average ∼70 to ∼20 to ∼2 pgm -3 from 5 to 100 to 1000<br />
m), supporting the hypothesis that the Hg oxidation reactions<br />
are occurring in the near-surface boundary layer driven by<br />
halogen compounds derived from sea-salt aerosols.<br />
We also performed the first RGM dry deposition measurements<br />
in the Arctic at 3 m above the snowpack using a<br />
tower-based relaxed eddy accumulation (REA) approach (22,<br />
24) with manual RGM denuders, as outlined above. Significant<br />
RGM fluxes measured during March 29-April 12 were<br />
directed toward the snow surface (overall mean net deposition<br />
)-0.4 ( 0.2 pg m -2 s -1 ; N ) 9, (1 SE). Computed dry<br />
deposition velocities for RGM were high, on the order of 1<br />
cm/s, and agree with those predicted by our inverse<br />
boundary-layer model (41). Quantifying the extent of areas<br />
of elevated Hg deposition is clearly an important research<br />
need, as is understanding its fate.<br />
Implications of the Barrow Study: Is This a Recent<br />
Phenomenon and What Is Its Extent? We have convincing<br />
evidence that tropospheric Hg 0 from the global background<br />
pool and long-range transport is being depleted from the air<br />
and converted to a form of rapidly depositing reactive gaseous<br />
mercury (RGM) following polar sunrise at Barrow, AK.<br />
Tropospheric oxidation by sea-salt-derived reactive halogens<br />
involved in O3 depletion (Br and Cl) generates peak levels of<br />
RGM at this remote site not observed at more southerly<br />
locations, including those near major point sources. This<br />
reactive Hg species has a very short atmospheric lifetime<br />
and accumulates in the Barrow snowpack in forms that
are bioavailable to bacteria. Mercury concentrations and<br />
accumulation rates in snowpack prior to snowmelt greatly<br />
exceed those in source regions such as eastern North America,<br />
and some of this Hg reaches the Arctic tundra ecosystem at<br />
the initiation of its annual growth cycle.<br />
Recent reports suggest this Hg oxidation phenomenon<br />
may exist at many Arctic sites as well as in the Antarctic (12,<br />
49-51) and could represent an important sink in the global<br />
cycle of Hg 0 (13). The implications of polar MDEs may be<br />
assessed by addressing two frequently asked questions: Is<br />
the phenomenon recent? and Are the polar regions an<br />
important sink for Hg in the global cycle or likely to become<br />
so? There are lines of evidence that suggest the answer to<br />
both questions is yes.<br />
Is This a Recent Phenomenon? Several data sets suggest<br />
that there has been a recent increase in Hg levels in Arctic<br />
biota despite a 20-yr decrease in global atmospheric Hg<br />
emissions of ∼30% (52). Mercury levels in seabird populations<br />
monitored within Arctic Canada have roughly doubled in<br />
the last 20-30 years (53), while Hg accumulation in ringed<br />
seals and beluga whales has also increased over the last two<br />
decades (54, 55). Mercury emissions within the Arctic are<br />
not thought to be increasing (52), and with global emissions<br />
clearly decreasing, another explanation must be sought.<br />
We suggest that Arctic MDEs are recent phenomena,<br />
resulting from changes in Arctic climate that have increased<br />
atmospheric transport of photooxidants and production of<br />
reactive halogens (Br/Cl) in the Arctic. Observations show<br />
that the Arctic region has undergone dramatic physical<br />
changes in climate over the last 30-40 years, including a<br />
decreasing trend in multi-year ice coverage, related increases<br />
in annual ice coverage, later timing of snowfall and earlier<br />
timing of snowmelt, increasing ocean temperature, and<br />
increasing atmospheric circulation and temperature (56). The<br />
changes related to ice formation can impact the dynamics<br />
of MDEs. The GOME satellite data suggest that BrO enhancements<br />
are generally absent over multi-year ice (notably<br />
within the Canadian basin) where ice thickness and windblown<br />
dust accumulation make sunlight conditions under<br />
the ice insufficient for algal primary productivity (one source<br />
of photolyzable Br). As multi-year ice is decreasing, annual<br />
ice is increasing. The reactive Br surface source is this polar<br />
annual sea ice region where ice thinness and optical<br />
transparency support rich under-ice biotic communities.<br />
Photolyzable bromine (a waste product of ice algae) builds<br />
up under the ice and escapes through constantly changing<br />
patterns of open leads and polynyas (open water in an actively<br />
upwelling region). These dynamic open water areas are also<br />
sources of sea-salt aerosols, water vapor, and heat from the<br />
comparatively warm ocean waters. All these products remain<br />
concentrated in the near surface air due to the lack of vertical<br />
convection (caused by limited solar input, the high-albedo<br />
snow/ice surfaces involved, and a positive temperature<br />
inversion strength (57)), where they react with O3 and other<br />
photooxidants, leading to oxidation of Hg 0 as described<br />
earlier.<br />
Changes in the chemical climate of the Arctic may also<br />
enhance Hg oxidation reactions. Satellite total ozone mapping<br />
(TOMS) data indicate an ∼20% decrease in total column<br />
ozone amounts over the Arctic since 1971, and decreased<br />
ozone leads to increased surface UV-B exposure (58). The<br />
link between Hg behavior and UV is clear from our data:<br />
near-surface RGM during the March-April period at Barrow<br />
is strongly correlated with a function of incident solar UV-B<br />
(which controls production of BrO from photolyzable Br)<br />
and wind speed (which controls the turbulent deposition<br />
rate) (r 2 ) 0.82; 41). Increased UV radiation reaching the<br />
troposphere may also result in increased levels of the OH<br />
radical through photolysis of tropospheric ozone (59). In the<br />
Arctic atmosphere, increasing OH levels could lead to even<br />
greater oxidation of Hg 0 because of a positive feedback<br />
between increasing OH and production of reactive halogens<br />
(Figure 5). If MDE-enhanced mercury deposition in the Arctic<br />
is a relatively recent phenomenon (as a result of increased<br />
synoptic activity and increased annual ice area, for example),<br />
this could explain the data sets showing a recent increase in<br />
Hg accumulation in Arctic biota, despite the decrease in global<br />
atmospheric emissions of Hg in recent decades.<br />
Are the Polar Regions an Important Sink for Hg in the<br />
Global Cycle? To address this question, one needs to assess<br />
the evidence for the spatial extent of the MDE phenomena<br />
and the extent to which deposited Hg is being re-emitted<br />
back into the atmosphere during and after snowmelt.<br />
Depletion events have now been recorded at five widely<br />
dispersed, primarily coastal, polar sites (12, 14, 49-51). One<br />
potential indicator of the overall spatial extent of these events<br />
is illustrated in the monthly GOME maps of BrO distribution.<br />
The average column BrO concentrations over the Arctic for<br />
April 2000 are shown in Figure 7. These and related maps<br />
(13) clearly suggest that MDEs and associated RGM production<br />
should be concentrated in coastal zones and in areas of<br />
active open water and might not be expected in other<br />
locations (e.g., continental Greenland). The bromine source<br />
regions are concentrated in the dynamic areas of annual sea<br />
ice, and emission products from these areas are advected<br />
downwind where reactive halogen compounds form under<br />
sunlight conditions (e.g., ref 36). The maps suggest that<br />
horizontal advection of Br compounds to inland and iceshelf<br />
regions is controlled by prevailing winds and is<br />
effectively dammed by topographic features such as the<br />
Brooks, Anadyr, and Rocky Mountain ranges as well as by<br />
the location of the polar front. The front tends to follow the<br />
permafrost contours around the pole; the BrO map follows<br />
roughly these same contours (Figure 7). Note that air over<br />
the ice-covered Greenland and Ellesmere Islands is relatively<br />
free of BrO enhancements because the predominating<br />
katabatic (outward flowing) winds over the icecaps block<br />
significant inland advection. Oxidation of Hg 0 and enhanced<br />
deposition of RGM would not be expected in these areas, a<br />
hypothesis that could be tested by future snow surveys.<br />
However, coastal locations, such as Nord and Alert, are<br />
affected by the local marine environment and do experience<br />
episodic BrO enhancements along with the associated<br />
mercury depletion events and ozone losses (12, 49). We expect<br />
that production of oxidized gaseous Hg species will also be<br />
reported for these areas once new measurements are<br />
underway in 2002.<br />
Recent surveys of environmental Hg levels near Barrow<br />
also indicate similarities in the spatial trends of enhanced<br />
BrO and Hg accumulation, as would be expected if RGM<br />
production is dependent on BrO. The concentrations of<br />
marine-related reaction products taper off with distance from<br />
the coastline, and Figure 7 illustrates a well-defined inland<br />
gradient in BrO in Alaska. Mercury levels there are also<br />
anticorrelated with distance from the coast: Landers et al.<br />
(3) reported such trends for Hg levels in Arctic Alaskan<br />
vegetation, and Snyder-Conn et al. (60) reported similar<br />
trends in total mercury levels in Arctic Alaskan snow. More<br />
recently, Garbarino et al. (61) showed that mercury concentrations<br />
in snow over sea ice were highest in the<br />
predominately downwind direction of the open water leads<br />
and polynyas surrounding Point Barrow (e.g., to the west),<br />
an area that often shows enhanced BrO (e.g., Figure 2).<br />
Comparable Data Exist for the Canadian Arctic. A recent<br />
report shows that locations of high total mercury concentrations<br />
in snow are well correlated with areas of high<br />
atmospheric BrO concentrations, especially in the Canadian<br />
archipelago (13). Mercury levels in biotic surveys also follow<br />
these trends; total mercury in Glaucous Gull eggs sampled<br />
at four coastal locations in Canada are highest in the Canadian<br />
VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 1253
FIGURE 7. Spatial patterns in monthly mean BrO over the Arctic for April 2000 showing locations of recorded mercury depletion events<br />
at Barrow, AK; Alert, NWT; Ny-A° lesund, Spitzbergen; and Station Nord, Greenland (mean vertical column BrO is expressed as molecule<br />
cm -2 , derived from GOME satellite data). MDEs have also been recorded at Neumeyer station, Antarctica, in an area of elevated BrO (not<br />
shown).<br />
archipelago where BrO is enhanced (53). The Canadian<br />
archipelago is dominated by annual ice and open water<br />
polynyas and leads, and the extensive shorelines and ocean<br />
currents between the islands create shear zones between<br />
the “fast” ice grounded to shore and the pack ice moving<br />
with the ocean currents. This interface area is dominated by<br />
the open leads that are probable sources of bromine and<br />
marine products to the near-surface air. A recent estimate<br />
of the gross atmospheric Hg loading to northern waters in<br />
this region was 50 T/yr (13). This estimate was based on Hg<br />
levels in snowpack that were generally lower than those<br />
reported near Barrow. Other estimates from models (49) and<br />
our preliminary scaling from GOME BrO data such as Figure<br />
7(63) range from ∼150-300 T/yr, but all such estimates of<br />
gross fluxes carry a high uncertainty.<br />
To assess the overall net strength of the so-called missing<br />
polar sink (14) using the GOME satellite BrO maps, we must<br />
fully understand the importance of Hg re-emission during<br />
snowmelt. Although re-emission is apparent (e.g., Figure 6,<br />
also ref 12), we and the group working at Alert (62) are yet<br />
unable to quantify its overall effect on the net accumulation<br />
of Hg in the Arctic. A simple analysis based on the upslope<br />
of the Hg 0 concentration in air during Barrow snowmelt (as<br />
an indicator of the re-emission signal, Figures 1, 2, and 6)<br />
suggests that melt-related re-emission represents ∼10-20%<br />
of the deposited Hg (63), and our measurements of Hg in<br />
runoff indicate that Hg is being transported to the tundra<br />
during snowmelt. Quantifying the net effect of re-emission<br />
1254 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002<br />
in the Arctic is clearly an important goal in understanding<br />
the fate of the deposited Hg.<br />
Since several lines of evidence support the hypothesis<br />
that elevated Hg levels exist in both abiotic and biotic pools<br />
in areas that are characterized by enhanced levels of BrO, an<br />
additional question arises: What will be the severity and extent<br />
of mercury depletion/oxidation events in the future? It is<br />
important to understand how the global mercury cycle will<br />
be affected by changes within the Arctic, as well as changes<br />
in atmospheric transport, and future and ongoing domestic/<br />
worldwide Hg emission reductions. Since a recent modeling<br />
study concluded that the concentrations of Hg in the Arctic<br />
atmosphere were indistinguishable from the global background<br />
(50), changes in physical climate might actually have<br />
a greater impact on the arctic Hg cycle than changes in global<br />
emissions.<br />
Multi-year ice thickness in the central arctic ocean, as<br />
measured by U.S. Navy submarines over the last two decades,<br />
has shown a remarkable 43% reduction in thickness (64). At<br />
this rate, the Arctic Ocean may become seasonally free of sea<br />
ice within 30-40 years. If this occurs, it will effectively double<br />
annual ice coverage, thereby doubling the total area affected<br />
by mercury depletion/oxidation and enhanced deposition.<br />
One likely scenario is that climate-driven reductions in multiyear<br />
ice coverage in favor of increased annual ice coverage<br />
throughout the Arctic will increase marine primary productivity<br />
(including ice algal communities). This scenario would<br />
result in production and release of more photolyzable
omine into the near-surface air. When these surface<br />
emissions of photolyzable bromine encounter an airmass<br />
containing Hg 0 emissions from southern latitudes under<br />
sunlight conditions, mercury depletion/deposition events<br />
will occur. The springtime mercury deposition rates in the<br />
Arctic could therefore be related (in the simplest sense) to<br />
a function of the spatial coverage of annual sea ice, the airmass<br />
transport of mercury emissions to this region, and local<br />
airmass circulation. These phenomena are, in turn, controlled<br />
by average spring and summertime temperatures (as a<br />
surrogate for melting multi-year ice), by multi-year ice<br />
coverage (which is decreasing; 65), by synoptic activity<br />
(increasing), and by variations in the position of the polar<br />
front (56, 66). There is a clear need for increased research on<br />
all these phenomena, especially over the Arctic Ocean, to<br />
determine if mercury depletion/oxidation events in the Arctic,<br />
and possibly also in the free troposphere at mid-latitudes<br />
(48, 67), could play an ever increasing role as an important<br />
sink in the global Hg cycle (13, 14).<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
We thank the sponsors of this project for their continued<br />
support [NOAA Office of Arctic Research, and the U.S. EPA<br />
Offices of International Affairs (methods speciation work at<br />
ORNL and Barrow) and Research and Development (BAMS-<br />
2001 aircraft and Hg-p sampling)]; Dan Endres, Malcolm<br />
Gaylord, and Glen McConville for local support at CMDL; F.<br />
Schaedlich for extended help with Tekran equipment; S.<br />
Oltmans for Barrow ozone data; and Lala Chambers, George<br />
Southworth, and Mary Anna Bogle for snow analyses and<br />
data management. GOME spectra have been supplied to A.R.<br />
by the ESA through the German Aerospace Centre (DFD/<br />
DLR Oberpfaffenhofen Germany). The REA system was<br />
developed under the supervision of H. Skov of NERI-DK and<br />
T. Meyers of NOAA. K.J.S. was supported by a scholarship<br />
from the Arctic Institute of North America and by a fellowship<br />
from the University of Manitoba. M.G. is supported by the<br />
Danish Research Agency and the Department of Atmospheric<br />
Environment, NERI-DK. This is Publication No. Hg-72 of<br />
the ORNL Hg Group.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
(1) Wheatley, B.; Wheatley, M. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 259, 23-<br />
30.<br />
(2) Wheatley, B.; Wheatley, M. Arctic Med. Res. 1988, 47 (Suppl. 1),<br />
163-167.<br />
(3) Landers, D. H.; Ford, J.; Gubala, C.; Monetti, M.; Lasorsa, B. K.;<br />
Martinson, J. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 80, 591-601.<br />
(4) Wagemann, R.; Lockhart, W. L.; Welch, H.; Innes, S. Water Air<br />
Soil Pollut. 1995, 80, 683-693.<br />
(5) Zimov, S. A.; Voropaev, Y. V.; Semiletov, I. P.; Davidov, S. P.;<br />
Prosiannikov, S. F.; Chapin, F. S., III; Chapin, M. C.; Trumbore,<br />
S.; Tyler, S. Science 1977, 277, 800-803.<br />
(6) St. Louis, V. L.; Rudd, J. M. W.; Kelly, C. A.; Beaty, K. G.; Bloom,<br />
N. S.; Flett, R. J. Can. J. Fish, Aquat. Sci. 1994, 51, 1065-1076.<br />
(7) Fahlke, J.; Bursik, A. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 80, 209-215.<br />
(8) Lindberg, S. E.; Stratton, W. J. Envir. Sci. Technol. 1998, 32, 49.<br />
(9) Bullock, O. R., Jr. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 259, 145.<br />
(10) Wania, F.; Mackay, D. Ambio 1993, 27, 2079.<br />
(11) Lin, C.-J.; Pehkonen, S. O. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 2067.<br />
(12) Schroeder, W. H.; Anlauf, K. G.; Barrie, L. A.; Lu, J. Y.; Steffen,<br />
A.; Schneeberger, D. R.; Berg, T. Nature 1998, 394, 331.<br />
(13) Lu, J. Y.; Schroeder, W. H.; Barrie, L.; Steffan, A.; Welch, H.;<br />
Martin, K.; Lockhart, L.; Hunt, R.; Bolia, G.; Richter, A. Geophys.<br />
Res. Lett. 2001, 28, 3219-3222.<br />
(14) Lindberg, S. E.; Brooks, S.; Lin, C.-J.; Scott, K.; Meyers, T.;<br />
Chambers, L.; Landis, M.; Stevens, R. Water Air Soil Pollut.:<br />
Focus 2001, 1, 295-302.<br />
(15) Oltmans, S. J.; Schnell, R. C.; Sheridan, P. J.; Peterson, R. E.; Li,<br />
S.-M.; Winchester, J. W.; Tans, P. P.; Sturges, W. T.; Kahl, J. D.;<br />
Barrie, L. A. Atmos. Environ. 1988, 23, 2431.<br />
(16) Lindberg, S. E.; Vette, A.; Miles, C.; Schaedlich, F. Biogeochemistry<br />
2000, 48 (2), 237.<br />
(17) Schroeder, W. H.; Keeler, G.; Kock, H.; Roussel, P.; Schneeberger,<br />
D.; Schaedlich, F. Water, Air, Soil, Pollut. 1994, 80, 611-620.<br />
(18) Ebinghaus, R.; Jennings, S. G.; Schroeder, W. H.; Berg, T.;<br />
Donaghy, T.; Guentzel, J.; Kenny, C.; Kock, H. H.; Kvietkus, K.;<br />
Landing, W.; Mühleck, T.; Munthe, J.; Prestbo, E. M.; Schneeberger,<br />
D.; Slemr, F.; Sommar, J.; Urba, A.; Wallschläger, D.;<br />
Xiao, Z. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 3063.<br />
(19) Gustin, M.-S.; Lindberg, S. E.; Casimir, A.; Ebinghaus, R.;<br />
Edwards, G.; Fitzgerald, C.; Kemp, J.; Kock, H. H.; London, J.;<br />
Majewski, M.; Owens, J.; Marsik, F.; Poissant, L.; Pilote, M.;<br />
Rasmussen, P.; Schaedlich, F.; Schneeberger, D.; Sommar, J.;<br />
Turner, R.; Vette, A.; Walshlager, D.; Xiao, Z.; Zhang, H. J. Geophys.<br />
Res. 1999, 104, 21831-21844.<br />
(20) Ng, A. C. W.; Corbridge, M. D.; Schneeberger, D. R.; Schaedlich,<br />
F. H. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1993, No. 93-TA-39.07, 8.<br />
(21) Landis, M.; Stevens, R. K.; Schaedlich, F.; Prestbo, P. Environ.<br />
Sci. Technol. (submitted for publication).<br />
(22) Goodsite, M. E. Fate of Mercury in the Arctic. Ph.D. Thesis,<br />
Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy, National Environmental<br />
Research Institute, 2002.<br />
(23) Christensen, C. S.; Hummelshøj, P.; Jensen, N. O.; Larsen, B.;<br />
Lohse, C.; Pilegaard, K.; Skov, H. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 3057-<br />
3067.<br />
(24) Businger, J. A.; Oncley, S. P. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 1990,<br />
7, 349.<br />
(25) Munthe, J.; Wängberg, I.; Pirrone, N.; Iverfeldt, A° .; Ferrara, R.;<br />
Costa, P.; Ebinghaus, R.; Feng, X.; Gårdfelt, K.; Keeler, G.;<br />
Lanzillotta, E.; Lindberg, S. E.; Lu, J.; Mamane, Y.; Nucaro, E.;<br />
Prestbo, E.; Schmolke, S.; Schroeder, W. H.; Sommar, J.; Sprovieri,<br />
F.; Stevens, R. K.; Stratton, W.; Tuncel, G.; Urba, A. Atmos.<br />
Environ. 2001, 35, 3007-3017.<br />
(26) Bloom, N. S. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1989, 46, 1131.<br />
(27) Selifonova, O.; Burlage, R.; Barkay, T. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.<br />
1993, 59, 3083-3090.<br />
(28) Scott, K. J.; Hudson, R. J. M.; Kelly, C. A.; Rudd, J. W. M.; Barkay,<br />
T. (manuscript in preparation).<br />
(29) Richter, A.; Wittrock, F.; Eisinger, M.; Burrows, J. P. Geophys.<br />
Res. Lett. 1998, 25, 2683.<br />
(30) Wittrock, F.; Richter, A.; Burrows, J. P. European Symposium on<br />
Atmospheric Measurements from Space, European Space<br />
Agency: 1999; WPP-161; pp 735-738.<br />
(31) Dumarey, R. Anal. Chim. Acta 1985, 170, 337-340.<br />
(32) Berg, W. W.; Sperry, P. D.; Rahn, K. A.; Gladney, E. S. J. Geophys.<br />
Res. 1983, 88, 6719.<br />
(33) Barrie, L.; Platt, U. Tellus 1997, 49B, 450.<br />
(34) Vogt, R.; Crutzen, P. J.; Sander, R. Nature 1996, 383, 327.<br />
(35) Dickerson, R. R.; Rhoads, K. P.; Carsey, T. P.; Oltmans, S. J.;<br />
Burrows, J. P.; Crutzen, P. J. J. Geophys. Res. 1999, 104, 21, 385.<br />
(36) Fan, S.-M.; Jacob, D. J. Nature 1992, 359, 522.<br />
(37) McConnell, J. C.; Henderson, G. S.; Barrie, L.; Bottenheim, J.;<br />
Niki, H.; Langford, C. H.; Templeton, E. M. Nature 1992, 355,<br />
150.<br />
(38) Mozurkewich, M. J. Geophys. Res. 1995, 100, 14, 199.<br />
(39) Richter, A.; Wittrock, F.; Eisinger, M.; Burrows, J. P. Geophys.<br />
Res. Lett. 1998, 25, 2683.<br />
(40) Foster, K. L.; Plastridge, R. A.; Bottenheim, J. W.; Shepson, P. B.;<br />
Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.; Spicer, C. W. Science 2001, 291, 471.<br />
(41) Brooks, S.; Lindberg, S. E. J. Geophys. Res. (in press).<br />
(42) Sheu, G.-R.; Mason, R. P. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1209.<br />
(43) St. Louis, V. L.; Rudd, J. W. M.; Kelly, C. A.; Barrie, L. A. Water<br />
Air Soil Pollut. 1995, 80, 405.<br />
(44) Welch, H. K.; Martin, K.; Lockhart, W. L.; Hunt, R. V.; Boila, G.<br />
In Synopsis of Research Conducted under the 1997/98 Northern<br />
Contaminants Program; Jensen, J., Ed.; Department of Indian<br />
Affairs and Northern Development: Ottawa, 1999; p 93.<br />
(45) Scott, K. J. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manitoba (in preparation.).<br />
(46) Amyot, M.; Mierle, G.; Lean, O. R. S.; McQueen, D. J. Environ.<br />
Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 2366.<br />
(47) Zhang, H.; Lindberg, S. E. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 928-<br />
935.<br />
(48) Landis, M. S.; Stevens, R. K.; McConville, G.; Brooks, S. R.<br />
Presented at the 6th International Conference on Mercury as<br />
a Global Pollutant, Minamata, Japan, October 2001 (manuscript<br />
in preparation).<br />
(49) Skov, H.; Christensen, J. H.; Goodsite, M. E.; Petersen, M. C.;<br />
Zeuthen-Heidam, N.; Geernaert, G.; Olsen, J. Dynamics and<br />
chemistry of atmospheric mercury; Danish contribution to<br />
EUROTRAC MEPOP report, Near surface conversion and fluxes<br />
of gaseous elemental mercury to reactive gaseous mercury in<br />
the Arctic, 2001.<br />
(50) Berg, T.; Sekkeseter, S.; Steiness, E.; Valdal, A.; Wibtoe, G.<br />
Presented at the 6th International Conference on Mercury as<br />
a Global Pollutant, Minamata, Japan, October 2001.<br />
VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002 / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 9 1255
(51) Ebinghaus, R.; Kock, H. H.; Temme, C.; Einax, J. W.; Löwe, A.<br />
G.; Richter, A.; Burrows, J. P.; Schroeder, W. H. Environ. Sci.<br />
Technol. 2002, 36, 1238-1244.<br />
(52) Pacyna, J. M.; Pacyna, E. G. Environ. Rev. (in press).<br />
(53) Braune, B. M.; Donaldson, G. M.; Hobson, K. A. Environ. Pollut.<br />
2001, 114, 39-54; followup (-II) paper by same authors<br />
(in press).<br />
(54) Hyatt, C. K.; Trebacz, E.; Metner, D. A.; Wagemann, R.; Lockhart,<br />
W. L. Presented at the 5th International Conference on Mercury<br />
as a Global Pollutant, Rio de Janeiro, May 1999.<br />
(55) Wagemann, R.; Innes, S.; Richard, P. R. Sci. Total Environ. 1996,<br />
186, 41-66.<br />
(56) Dickson, R. R. Nature 1999, 397, 389-391.<br />
(57) Kahl, J. D. Int. J. Climatol. 1990, 10, 537-548.<br />
(58) Cahill, C.; Weatherhead, E. Chron. NSF Arctic Sci. Prog. 2001,<br />
8, 1.<br />
(59) Madronich, S.; Granier, C. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1992, 19, 465.<br />
(60) Snyder-Conn, E.; Garbarino, J. R.; Hoffman, G. L.; Oelkers, A.<br />
Arctic 1997, 50, 201-215.<br />
(61) Garbarino, J. R.; Snyder-Conn, E.; Leiker, T. J.; Hoffman, G. L.<br />
Water Air Soil Pollut. (in review).<br />
1256 9 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY / VOL. 36, NO. 6, 2002<br />
(62) Schroeder, W. H. Meteorological Service of Canada., Toronto,<br />
personal communication.<br />
(63) Lindberg, S.; Brooks, S.; Lin, C.-J.; Scott, K.; Landis, M.; Stevens,<br />
R. Presented at the 6th International Conference on Mercury<br />
as a Global Pollutant, Minamata, Japan, October 2001.<br />
(64) Rothrock, D. A.; Yu, Y.; Maykut, G. A. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1999,<br />
26, 3469-3472.<br />
(65) Maslanik, J. A.; Serreze, M. C.; Agnew, T. Geophys. Res. Lett.<br />
1999, 26, 1905-1908.<br />
(66) Serreze, M. C.; Box, J.; Barry, R. G.; Walsh, J. E. Meteorol. Atmos.<br />
Phys. 1993, 51, 147-64.<br />
(67) Murphy, D. M.; Thompson, D. S. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2000, 27,<br />
3217.<br />
Received for review August 15, 2001. Revised manuscript<br />
received December 19, 2001. Accepted December 20, 2001.<br />
ES0111941
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 3: Skov, H., Christensen, J., Goodsite, M.E., Heidam, N.Z., Jensen, B., Wåhlin, P.,<br />
Geernaert, G. The Fate of Elemental Mercury in Arctic during Atmospheric Mercury<br />
Depletion Episodes and the Load of Atmospheric Mercury to Arctic. Submitted to<br />
Environmental Science and Technology, June 2003.
The fate of elemental mercury in Arctic during atmospheric mercury depletion<br />
episodes and the load of atmospheric mercury to Arctic<br />
Authors: Henrik Skov*, Jesper Christensen, <strong>Michael</strong> E. Goodsite 1 , Niels Z. Heidam, Bjarne Jensen,<br />
Peter Wåhlin and Gerald Geernaert 2 .<br />
*Corresponding author.<br />
National Environmental Research Institute, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.<br />
2<br />
Now at Dept. of Chemsitry, Univ. of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M,<br />
Denmark<br />
1<br />
Now at Inst. of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS C-305<br />
Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA.<br />
Abstract<br />
Atmospheric mercury depletion episodes (AMDE’s) have been studied at Station Nord, Northeast<br />
Greenland, 81 0 36'N, 16 0 40'W, during Arctic Spring. Gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) and ozone<br />
were measured starting from 1998 and 1999, respectively until August 2002. GEM was measured<br />
with a TEKRAN 2735A automatic mercury analyser based on pre-concentration of mercury on a<br />
gold trap followed by detection using fluorescence spectroscopy. Ozone was measured by UV<br />
absorption. A scatter plot of GEM and ozone confirmed that also at Station Nord GEM and ozone<br />
are linearly correlated during AMDEs. The relationship between ozone and GEM is further<br />
investigated in this paper using basic reaction kinetics, i.e., Cl, ClO, Br and BrO have been<br />
suggested as reactants for GEM. The analyses in this paper show that GEM most probably is<br />
reacting with Br.<br />
Based on the experimental results of this paper and results from the literature a simple<br />
parameterisation for AMDE was included into the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM).<br />
GEM is converted linearly to reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) over sea ice with temperature less<br />
than – 4 o C with a lifetime of 3 to 10 hours. The new AMDE parameterisation was used together<br />
with the parameterisation of mercury chemistry (21). The obtained model results were compared<br />
with measurements of GEM at Station Nord. There was good agreement between the start and<br />
general features of an AMDE, though the fast concentration changes could not be reproduced by the<br />
model. Furthermore, the modelled RGM concentrations over the Arctic were found to agree well<br />
with the temporal and geographical variability of the surface column of BrO observed by the<br />
GOME satellite.<br />
Scenario calculations were carried out with and without an AMDE. The resulting mercury<br />
deposition was calculated at various locations in the Arctic and sub-Arctic and was found to be of<br />
the same general magnitude. For the area north of the Polar Circle the mercury deposition was<br />
demonstrated to increase from 89 tons/year for calculations without an AMDE to 208 tons/year<br />
while with the AMDE, 208 tons/year represents the upper limit for the mercury load.<br />
Introduction<br />
Mercury is found at high levels in marine animals at many places in the Arctic and North Atlantic<br />
Ocean (1). It has been shown that the present levels of mercury in sea animals have a negative<br />
effect also on the health of the local populations, who in turn depend on these animals as food<br />
supply (2). Furthermore, the input of atmospheric mercury to the Arctic environment has at least<br />
tripled compared to pre-industrial times (3).<br />
The lifetime of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) in the atmosphere (95% of atmospheric<br />
mercury) is in general about 1 year (4). However, in the Arctic during spring, the lifetime of GEM<br />
is significant shorter and GEM is observed to be depleted in less than one day during mercury<br />
1
depletion episodes (AMDE), (5,6,7,). During an AMDE, GEM is converted to oxidised mercury in<br />
the gas phase the so-called reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) that deposits fast to the ground (6,8,).<br />
AMDE occurs typically in the Arctic from March to June, which coincidentally occurs when the<br />
marine arctic ecosystems are also extremely active due to the increasing solar flux combined with<br />
the melting of sea ice (9). Therefore, it is hypothesised that there is a higher efficiency of<br />
bioaccumulation of mercury than would be expected from extrapolating data from mid-latitudes to<br />
the Arctic. Thus it is very important to get a fully understanding of the processes responsible for the<br />
AMDE’s.<br />
Ozone has been observed to be depleted during the Arctic spring for nearly 15 years (10) and it is<br />
well accepted that it is due to photochemical degradation after the polar sunrise. More recently it<br />
has been demonstrated that GEM is depleted as well and that GEM is strongly correlated with<br />
ozone during an AMDE (5). Ref. (6) showed that solar radiation and surface temperature of marine<br />
ice either control or are proxies for controls driving the depletion of GEM. However, very little is<br />
known about the reaction(s) transforming GEM to RGM. Several hypotheses have been proposed<br />
where Cl and/or Br atoms or ClO and/or BrO are common candidates initiated by the heterogeneous<br />
reaction between ozone and sea salt chloride or bromide on the surface of sea ice with temperatures<br />
below –4 o C. Thus AMDE is expected to be limited to areas exposed to marine air. Though the ratio<br />
is 300/1 of Cl - /Br - in seawater, a series of physical and chemical processes favours the liberation of<br />
bromine compared to chlorine from the sea ice (11).<br />
Measurements of GEM and ozone at Station Nord, Northeast Greenland are presented in this paper.<br />
The data are treated using basic reaction kinetic theory and physical theory for mixing of gases in<br />
the atmosphere. The results of the measurements presented here and results from other studies are<br />
used to make a simple parameterisation of AMDE, which was then used in the DEHM (12, 13). The<br />
results of the model calculations are compared with measured values of GEM in this study and with<br />
satellite observations of BrO (from the GOME satellite). The model is used to calculate the burden<br />
of atmospheric mercury to some coastal areas in the Arctic and Sub-arctic. Finally the importance<br />
of AMDE for the burden of atmospheric mercury to the Arctic is determined by scenario<br />
calculations with and without AMDE.<br />
Experimental<br />
Measurements<br />
Weekly average concentrations of atmospheric bromine were determined from samples collected at<br />
40 l/min through a 42 mm inlet diameter on a particle filter, the first of a series of 47 mm filters in a<br />
filter pack. A detailed description of the filter pack system is given elsewhere, (14). The resulting<br />
filters were transported to the laboratory where they were analysed by proton induced x-ray<br />
emission (PIXE) that is capable of detecting elements heavier than Aluminium (15)). The results of<br />
the analysis showed that the concentration of bromine atoms was the same on the front and reverse<br />
side of the filter. If bromine were present only in particle phase, it would have been observed only<br />
on the front side. Therefore a significant fraction of the measured bromine must have been present<br />
in the gas phase (16). The measured bromine is thus called filterable bromine, fBr. The uncertainty<br />
of the method is estimated to be 25 % at a 95% confidence interval.<br />
Ozone and GEM were measured starting in 1998 and 1999 respectively and until June 2002. GEM<br />
was only measured from February through mid-summer (July or August) each year. The monitoring<br />
site is at the Danish military base at Station Nord, Northeast Greenland located at 81 0 36'N,<br />
16 0 40'W, see Fig. 1a. The measurements were performed at the Danish AMAP site, ‘Flyger’s<br />
Hytte’, a laboratory hut located approximately 3 km south of the central complex of buildings, as<br />
shown on the map in the Fig. 1b. The temperature in the hut was constant at 15±1 0 C.<br />
2
Ozone was measured with an UV absorption monitor, API , with a detection limit of 1 ppbv and an<br />
uncertainty of 3 % for concentrations above 10 ppbv and 6 % for concentrations below 10 ppbv, (all<br />
uncertainties are at a 95% confidence interval) (17).<br />
GEM was measured by a TEKRAN 2537A mercury analyser. The principle of the instrument is as<br />
follows: A measured volume of sample air is drawn through a gold trap that quantitatively retains<br />
elemental mercury. The collected mercury is desorbed from the gold trap by heat and is transferred<br />
by argon into the detection chamber, where the amount of mercury is detected by cold vapour<br />
atomic fluorescence spectroscopy. The detection limit is 0.1 ng/m 3 and the reproducibility for<br />
concentrations above 0.5 ng/m 3 is within 20% on a 95% confidence interval based on parallel<br />
measurements with two TEKRAN 2537A mercury analysers. It is not at present reasonable to give<br />
the combined uncertainty of the method following the guidelines of ISO 14956, as the exact identity<br />
of the measured mercury is unknown, though GEM is determined as the dominant compound (18).<br />
In order to protect the instrument against humidity and sea salt, a soda-lime trap was placed in the<br />
sample line just in front of the analyser before the 2001 season in order to avoid passivation of the<br />
gold traps (19). However, no change in the level of GEM at Station Nord was observed after the<br />
installation of the trap. Parallel measurements of GEM in Denmark at a site not directly influenced<br />
by sea spray with and without soda lime trap showed a perfect agreement within the uncertainty<br />
established previously.<br />
The model<br />
The Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model System (DEHM) is described in detail elsewhere (12,13),<br />
so only a short description is given here. The model system consists of two parts: a meteorological<br />
part based on the PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Model version 5 (MM5) (20) and an air pollution model<br />
part, the DEHM model. The model system is driven by the global meteorological data obtained<br />
from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) on a 2.5 o x 2.5 o grid<br />
with a time resolution of 12 hours.<br />
The DEHM model is based on a set of coupled full three-dimensional advection-diffusion<br />
equations, one equation for each species. The horizontal mother domain of the model is defined on<br />
a regular 96x96 grid that covers most of the Northern Hemisphere with a grid resolution of 150 km<br />
× 150 km at 60 o N. The vertical resolution is defined on an irregular grid with 20 layers up to about<br />
15 km reflecting the structure of the atmosphere.<br />
The chemistry scheme of mercury in the atmosphere includes 13 mercury species: 3 in gas-phase<br />
(Hg 0 , HgO and HgCl2), 9 species in the aqueous-phase and 1 in particulate phase and is adopted<br />
from the literature (21). Furthermore an additional 1. order reaction of GEM was added where GEM<br />
is reacting to form RGM inside the boundary layer over sea ice during sunny conditions in order to<br />
mimic an AMDE. The reaction rate constant for the 1. order removal is based on the observed<br />
removal rates of mercury. The measurements gave a 1. order lifetime of GEM between 3 and 10<br />
hours, so scenario calculations with this range of lifetime were carried out. The fast 1. order<br />
oxidation was stopped, when surface temperature exceeded -4 o C as this temperature appears to be<br />
crucial for the presence of AMDE as Br2 and BrCl are formed at the surfaces of re-freezing leads<br />
and leads are representing the most important halogen source during AMDE (6). Except for the<br />
AMDE, the fate of GEM was controlled by a slow chemical removal in the gas phase and uptake by<br />
cloud water.<br />
The dry deposition velocities of the reactive gaseous mercury species are based on the resistance<br />
method, where the surface resistance is similar to nitric-acid, i.e. 0 s m -1 (8). The wet deposition of<br />
reactive and particulate mercury is parameterised by using a simple scavenging coefficients<br />
formulation with different in-cloud and below-cloud scavenging coefficients (12).<br />
The emissions of anthropogenic mercury are based on the global inventory of mercury emissions<br />
for 1995 on a 1 o x1 o grid (22) including emissions of GEM, RGM and total particulate mercury<br />
3
(TPM). The model does not contain any re-emissions from land and oceans. Instead, a background<br />
concentration of 1.5 ng/m 3 of Hg 0 is used as initial concentrations and boundary conditions. The<br />
mercury model has been run for the period October 1998 to October 2002.<br />
Results and discussion<br />
Measurements<br />
The results of ozone and GEM measurements are shown in Fig. 2 together with concentrations of<br />
fBr. It is seen that ozone and GEM are rather stable from September/October until the end of<br />
February/beginning of March. Then a highly perturbed period is occurring where ozone and GEM<br />
within hours are both depleted to 0 from about 40 ppbv and 1.5 ng/m 3 , respectively. The<br />
concentrations remain at 0 for periods that may last at some hours up to several days before<br />
suddenly rising again. At the same time fBr increases and reaches a maximum of about 10 ng/m 3 . In<br />
July, the ozone concentration stabilises just above 20 ppbv and then it slowly increases to about 40<br />
ppbv in September/October and fBr decreases to values close to zero.<br />
GEM was measured from February to the end of July or to the beginning of August. The<br />
measurements were focusing on the description of the AMDE. Previously a investigation has<br />
described that ozone and GEM are simultaneously depleted and that they are highly correlated<br />
during these depletion episodes (5). This is indeed confirmed by the present data set, Fig. 3. After<br />
the depletion period some very high concentrations of GEM appeared with values above 2 ng/m 3 .<br />
Similar observations were also done at Alert (5), at Barrow (6) and at Svalbard (7) and they are<br />
attributed to reemission of mercury to the atmosphere.<br />
The strong correlation between ozone and GEM suggests that they are dependent on a mutual<br />
factor. A direct reaction between ozone and GEM can be ruled out due to the long lifetime of GEM<br />
with respect to the present ozone concentrations (4). In a field study (23) BrO was observed to build<br />
up when ozone is decreased due to the reaction:<br />
O Br ⎯⎯→O<br />
+ BrO<br />
3 + 2<br />
(1).<br />
Therefore serious candidates for GEM removal are Br or BrO. However Cl and ClO cannot be<br />
ignored as significant Cl removal of organic compounds have been observed during AMDE (e.g.<br />
ref. (24) and the importance of these species depends on their concentrations and their reactivity<br />
towards GEM.<br />
The lifetime of GEM is observed to be typically about 10 hours during AMDE. Up to 30 ppt of ClO<br />
and 30 ppt BrO have been observed (25) and thus the resulting rate constants for the reactions<br />
between GEM and BrO and/or ClO can be estimated to be in the order of 4Χ10 -14 cm 3 molec -1 sec -1 ,<br />
see reaction 2 and 3 respectively:<br />
Hg + BrO ⎯⎯→<br />
HgO + Br<br />
(2)<br />
and/or<br />
Hg + ClO ⎯⎯→<br />
HgO + Cl<br />
(3)<br />
The most probable product of reaction 2 and/or reaction 3 is the formation of HgO, which has a<br />
very low vapour pressure (9Χ10 -12 Pa, (26)). Thus the reaction would lead to the formation TPM<br />
and not RGM as observed (6). Furthermore in a thermodynamic study calculations were carried out<br />
4
demonstrating that BrO and ClO with GEM are endothermic (27) and thus reaction 2 and 3 are most<br />
probably not important for the removal of Hg o in the atmosphere.<br />
Instead of BrO and ClO, GEM may react with Cl and/or Br. Therefore the data were analysed<br />
assuming relative rate conditions between ozone and GEM. The method is widely used under<br />
laboratory conditions, where the reaction of interest is proceeding in competition with another<br />
reaction with a well-known reaction rate constant. So the system here is:<br />
and<br />
O + X → product<br />
3 (4)<br />
Hg + X → product<br />
(5),<br />
where X is either Br or Cl and assuming that all other reactions are of negligible importance for the<br />
removal of ozone and GEM.<br />
The kinetic equations for reaction 4 and 5 are:<br />
and<br />
[ GEM ]<br />
∫<br />
[ GEM ]<br />
[ O ]<br />
3<br />
∫<br />
[ O ]<br />
t<br />
t<br />
d ln [ O ] = −k<br />
[ X ]dt<br />
(6)<br />
3 0<br />
3<br />
t<br />
∫<br />
4<br />
0<br />
t<br />
d ln [ GEM ] = −k<br />
[ X ]dt<br />
(7),<br />
0<br />
respectively.<br />
∫<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Integrating equation and dividing equation 6 with 7 the relative rate expression is obtained.<br />
[ GEM ]<br />
[ GEM ]<br />
[ ]<br />
[ ] ⎟⎟<br />
O ⎞ 3 0<br />
O<br />
⎛<br />
⎛<br />
0 ⎞ k5<br />
ln ⎜ ⎟ = • ln⎜<br />
⎜<br />
(8).<br />
⎝<br />
t ⎠ k4<br />
⎝ 3 t ⎠<br />
A plot of ln([GEM]0/[GEM]t against ln([O3]0/[O3]t should give a straight line with intercept 0 and a<br />
slope equal to k5/k4. Fig. 4 shows such a plot using the data from Station Nord. Data were selected<br />
for periods where the initial concentration of GEM was above 0.4 ng/m 3 in order to ensure good<br />
signal to noise ratio and where three consecutive measurements of both ozone and GEM are<br />
decreasing. All measurement included were in periods with 24 hour daylight. There is a strong<br />
linear correlation (
the literature of the reactions of Hg o with halogen atoms are also listed. All laboratory results are<br />
obtained using relative rate conditions.<br />
The reactions of halogens with Hg are independent of temperature (29,30) and therefore results of<br />
the various studies should be directly comparable. On the other hand ozone reactions with halogen<br />
atoms are temperature dependent and thus the rate constants obtained here of Hg are calculated at<br />
233 K and 263 K representative for the conditions in Arctic during mercury depletion.<br />
In general the half-life of GEM at Station Nord is 3 to 10 hours during an AMDE. Using rate<br />
constants of the latest study (31) this lifetime corresponds to a concentration of Br or Cl at 1-3 pptv<br />
and 0.1-0.3 pptv, respectively. Laboratories report Cl concentrations in the Arctic during AMDEs<br />
from 0.001 to 0.004 ppt (24,32,33), at least a factor of 25 lower in concentration than needed for the<br />
observed GEM depletion, whereas Br in the ppt level is reported by many authors (24,25,32,33).<br />
This implies that Br most probably is the key species leading to mercury depletion.<br />
Based on the results presented above the most important reactant for GEM removal is Br and the<br />
results in the study indicate a second order reaction rate constant of about 1•10 -12 cm 3 molec -1 sec -1 .<br />
The above result needs confirmation in the laboratory and though the result is a strong indication of<br />
the removal channel for GEM other possibilities needs to be examined before a definite answer can<br />
be given. In particular, it is important to clarify the role of heterogeneous chemistry during<br />
AMDE’s. Furthermore, there is a factor 16 difference in the reaction rate constant of the reaction<br />
between Br and Hg o reported (34,31) and in both cases determined by the relative rate technique.<br />
The difference shows that secondary reactions in the laboratory systems clearly plays a role and<br />
thus the reaction rate constant needs to be determined by an absolute method. To the knowledge of<br />
the authors there is not any study of the reaction rates constant of the reactions between Hg and ClO<br />
or BrO in the literature. Interesting enough there is good agreement between the theoretical<br />
calculated rate constant (27) and the rate constant extracted from the field measurements presented<br />
here. However, that might be a coincidence.<br />
The reaction between Br and Hg o leads to the formation of a radical.<br />
Hg + Br → HgBr •<br />
(9).<br />
The further fate of this radical is at the moment speculative but is the subject for a theoretical study<br />
(27,35).<br />
Modelling<br />
The mercury model has been run for October 1998 to October 2002 and the model results for GEM<br />
(Hg o ) are compared with measurements from Station Nord. The model does a good job reproducing<br />
the occurrence and length of AMDE but the simple parameterisation does not and cannot describe<br />
the fast variations in the period during the spring period, (Fig. 5). However, the main structure is<br />
reproduced and the results present a large step forward in the understanding of the fate of mercury<br />
in the Arctic atmosphere. The reproduction of the main structure is a strong indication for that the<br />
limiting factor is the surface conditions, which has to be sea ice with surface temperature below –4<br />
o C. A comparison of three model runs with observed GEM is shown in Fig. 5. The three model runs<br />
are: 1) without depletion, 2) with depletion where lifetime during depletion is 10 hours, and 3) with<br />
depletion and lifetime on 3 hours. The main difference between the two last runs with depletion is<br />
only a slightly higher minimum level in the case of 10 hour life time. The variations and duration of<br />
episodes are not changed.<br />
6
In the model the removal of GEM leads to build-up of RGM as observed in the field (6). The<br />
calculated concentrations of RGM have been compared with measured integrated surface column of<br />
BrO as obtained from the GOME satellite (36). In Fig. 6 the mean BrO column near the surface (in<br />
the boundary layer) and RGM concentrations for each month are shown for the period of January to<br />
June 2000. The figures show clearly that BrO and RGM have the same general temporal and<br />
geographical variability and reach their maximum level and extension in April to May. This finding<br />
supports that the conversion of GEM in fact is connected to sea-ice with temperatures below –4 o C<br />
and to the chemistry of Br. Notwithstanding there is general good agreement between RGM and<br />
BrO, some clear discrepancies can be observed. In May the largest BrO concentrations are found<br />
along the coast of the Beaufort Sea (North of Canada and Alaska), whereas maximum RGM<br />
concentrations are predicted North of Greenland. At present there is no explanation for this<br />
observation but most probably it reflects the rough assumption that RGM is produced ubiquitously<br />
above surfaces with temperatures below –4 o C. Bromine is most probably formed on the surface of<br />
re-freezing leads (6). These leads form and disappear again more or less randomly around the Arctic<br />
Ocean depending on the oceanic currents, wind, temperature and solar flux. Therefore large<br />
variation in the concentrations of bromine is expected during spring and thus also in the removal of<br />
GEM and build up of RGM concentration. This feature is in fact clearly seen in the measurements<br />
of GEM, Fig. 2 and 5; and it explains the discrepancy between the model results giving a smooth<br />
depletion event extending for the whole depletion period, whereas measurements show a long series<br />
of shorter depletion episodes during the depletion period.<br />
The deposition of atmospheric mercury calculated with DEHM is shown in Fig. 7 for some selected<br />
locations in the Arctic: Station Nord (Greenland), Barrow (Alaska), Alert (Canada), Thule<br />
(Greenland), Spitzbergen (Norway), in the sub-Arctic, Nuuk area (south Greenland), and on Faeroe<br />
Islands and Denmark. The total deposition is divided into three components: the contribution from<br />
deposition of; RGM, photo-chemically formed TPM, and directly emitted TPM. It is clearly seen<br />
how important the depletion phenomenon is for the deposition of mercury in the high Arctic,<br />
whereas it has practically no importance in the Faroe Islands. However, the Nuuk area appears to be<br />
influenced by AMDEs and there are on going field activities to confirm experimentally if AMDEs<br />
extends to this sub-arctic area. The importance of AMDE for the mercury load is seen for example<br />
for the Thule area, where the total deposition of mercury is increased by a factor 3, while for the<br />
Faeroe Islands the depletion phenomena only lead to a 10% increase of the mercury deposition. The<br />
contribution from directly emitted particulate mercury is very small in the high Arctic. It is mainly<br />
the large atmospheric reservoir of elemental mercury, which contributes through its chemical<br />
conversion to RGM followed by fast deposition of RGM. For all places close to the sea the total<br />
deposition is at the same levels. However, the large contribution of RGM deposition in the Arctic<br />
occurs only over a 4 month period from March to June where the algae bloom occurs (9). This fact<br />
might lead to a higher uptake of mercury in the food chain than would be expected if one simply<br />
extrapolated data from mid latitudes to the Arctic.<br />
The deposition of mercury for 1999 and 2000 is shown in Fig. 8 for the Northern Hemisphere with<br />
and without AMDE’s. The largest depositions are found close to the sources in Asia, Europe and<br />
North America mainly due to the deposition of primarily emitted RGM and TPM that is removed<br />
fast mainly due to dry deposition and washout by rain. The calculations with and without AMDE’s<br />
show again the importance of AMDE in the Arctic for the total deposition of mercury. Here the<br />
photochemically formed RGM is removed mainly by dry deposition as the Arctic is characterized<br />
by its very dry climate. The total annual deposition increases in the whole Arctic, and for the area<br />
north of the Polar Circle the total deposition of mercury increases from 89 to 208 tons/year due to<br />
the depletion.<br />
7
While we believe that we have made a major advance in understanding the chemistry governing<br />
MDEs, these results associated with mercury load estimates have to be taken with caution for<br />
several reasons.<br />
• There is far from full understanding of the chemical processes controlling atmospheric mercury<br />
and as a consequence the parameterization of AMDE in the model is not at present adequate for<br />
a reliable quantitative calculation of the mercury burden.<br />
• The source of Br is not well described and thus the temporal and geographical variability is not<br />
well described<br />
• Evidence is reported for re-emission of mercury to the atmosphere, which is not included in the<br />
model<br />
For these reasons the 208 tons/year represents only an estimate of the upper limit for the mercury<br />
load to the Arctic area.<br />
Acknowledgement<br />
A. Richter is acknowledged for providing us with the BrO data from the GOME satellite.<br />
The Danish Environmental Protection Agency financially supported this work with means from the<br />
MIKA/DANCEA funds for Environmental Support to the Arctic Region. The findings and<br />
conclusions presented here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency.<br />
The Royal Danish Air Force is acknowledged for providing free transport to Station Nord and the<br />
staff at Station Nord are specially acknowledged for an excellent support<br />
<strong>Michael</strong> E. Goodsite was financially supported by NERI and the Danish Research Council.<br />
References<br />
1. AMAP Greenland 1994-1996, (1997) Publisher: Ministry of the Environment and Energy,<br />
Danish Environmental Protection Agency, ISBN 87-7810-762-8.<br />
2. Grandjean, P. Weihe, P. White, R.F and Debes, F. Env. Res. Sec A. (1998) 77, 165-172.<br />
3. Shotyk, W. Goodsite, M.E. Roos-Barraclough, F. Frei, R. Heinemeier, J. Asmund, G. Lohse, C.<br />
Hansen, T.S. Anthropogenic contributions to atmospheric Hg, Pb and As accumulation recorded<br />
by peat cores from southern Greenland and Denmark dated using the 14C “bomb pulse curve”<br />
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta Accepted 02 June, 2003<br />
4. Lin C-J. and Pehkonen, S.O. Atm. Envir.333 (1999) pp. 2067-2070.<br />
5. Schroeder, W.H., Anlauf, K.G., Barrie, L.Y., Lu, A., Schneebeerger, D.R. and Berg, T. Nature<br />
(1998) 394, 331-332.<br />
6. Lindberg, S.E. Brooks, S. C-J. Lin, C-J. Scott, K.J. Landis, M.S. Stevens R.K. Goodsite, M. and<br />
Richter, A. E. S.& T. (2002) 36, 1245-1256.<br />
7. Berg, T. Batnicki, J. Munthe, J. Lattila, H. Hrehoruk, J. and Mazur, A. Atm. Envir. (2001) 35,<br />
2569-2582.<br />
8. Goodsite, M.E. Brooks, S.B.Lindberg, S.E. Meyers, T.P Skov, H. and Larsen, M.R.B. (2003)<br />
Measuring reactive gaseous mercury flux by relaxed eddy accumulation using KCl coated<br />
annular denuders. Under preparation.<br />
9. Hansen, A.S. Nielsen, T.G. Levinsen, H. Madsen, S.D. Thingstad, T.F. and Hansen, B.W.<br />
Deep-Sea Res. Part I (2003) 50, 171-187.<br />
10. Barrie, L.A. Bottenheim, J.W. Schnell, R,C. Crutzen, P.J. and Rasmussen, R.A. Nature (1988)<br />
334, 138-141.<br />
11. Foster, K.L. Plastridge Atm. Env. , R.A. Bottenheim, J.W. Shepson, P.B. Finlayson-Pitts, B.J.<br />
Spicer C.W. Science (2001) 291, 471-474.<br />
12. Christensen, J. Atm. Env. (1997) 31, 4169-4191.<br />
13. Christensen, J.H. Brandt, J. Frohn, L.M. and Skov, H. Submitted to Atm. Chem. Phys. April<br />
2003.<br />
14. Heidam, N.Z. Wåhlin, P. and Christensen, J.H. J. Atm. Sciences, (1999) 56, 261-278.<br />
8
15. Kemp, K. and Wåhlin, P. Application of Accelerators in Research and Industry, Proceedings of<br />
the 15. International Conference (eds. J.L. Duggan and J.L. Morgan), AIP, Woodbury, New<br />
York (1999) 472-475.<br />
16. Impey, G.A. Mikele, C.M. Anlauf, K.G. Barrie,L.A. Hastie, D.R. and Shepson, P.B. J. At.Chem.<br />
(1999) 34, 21-34.<br />
17. H. Skov, A.H. Egeløv, K. Granby and T. Nielsen. Atm. Environ. 1997, vol. 31 No. 5, p 685-<br />
691.<br />
18. Ebinghaus, R. kock, H.H. Schmolke, S.R. Fres. Jour. Anal. Chem. (2001) 371, 806-815<br />
19. Skov, H. Nielsdóttir, M.C. Goodsite, M.E. Christensen, J. Skjøth, C.A. Geernaert, G. Hertel, O.<br />
Olsen, J. Accept. Asian Chemistry Letters (2003).<br />
20. Grell, G. A., Dudhia J. and Stauffer D. R., A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR<br />
Mesoscale Model (MM5). NCAR/TN-398+STR. NCAR Technical Note. June 1995. Mesoscale<br />
and Microscale Meteorology Division. National Center for Atmospheric Research. Boulder,<br />
Colorado, pp. 122, 1995.<br />
21. Petersen, G. Munthe, J. Pleijel, K. Bloxam, R. and Vinod Kumar, A., Atm. Env. (1998) 32, 829-<br />
843.<br />
22. Pacyna E.G. and Pacyna J.M. Water, Air and Soil Pollution (2002) 137, 149-165.<br />
23. Hausmann, M. and Platt, U. J. Geophys. Res. (1994) 99, D12, 25,399-25,413.<br />
24. Boudries, H. and Bottenheim, J.W. Geophys. Res. Let. (2000) 27,4. 517-520.<br />
25. Tuckermann, M. Ackermann, R. Gölz, C. Lorenzen-Schmidt, H. Senne, T. Stutz, J, Trost, B.<br />
Unold, W. and Platt, U. Tellus, (1997) 49B, 533-555.<br />
26. Schroeder, W. and Munthe, J. Atm. Envir. (1998) 32, 809-822.<br />
27. Goodsite, M.E. Plane, J. Skov, H. 2003. A thermodynamic modelling study of the oxidation of<br />
mercury during polar sunrise, in preparation for Atmospheric Environment, June 2003<br />
28. DeMore, W.B. Sander, S.P. Golden, D.M. Hampson, R.F. Kurylo, M.J. Howard, C.J.<br />
Ravinshankara, A.R. Kolb, C.E. Milina, M.J. (1997) Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical<br />
Data for Use in Stratospheric Modeling. Evaluation 12. NASA panel evaluation.<br />
29. Horne, D.G. Gosavi, R. and Strausz, O.P. The J. Chem. Phys. Lett. (1968) 48, 4758-4764.<br />
30. Grieg, G. Gunning, H.E. and Strausz. The J. Chem. Phys Lett. (1970) 52, 3684-3690.<br />
31. Ariya, P.A. Khalizov, A. and Gidas, A. J. Phys. Chem. (2002) 106, 7310-7320.<br />
32. Röckmann, T. Brenninkmeijer, C.A.M. Crutzen, P.J. and Platt, U. J. Geophys. Res. (1999) 104,<br />
1691-1697.<br />
33. Jobson, B.T. Niki, H. Yokouchi, Y. Bottenheim, F. Hopper, F. and Leaitch, R. J. Geophys. Res.<br />
(1994) 99, 25,355-25,368.<br />
34. Sommar, J. Gårdfelt, K. Feng, X. and Lindquist, O. Rate coefficient for gas-phase<br />
oxidation of elemental mercury by bromine and hydroxyl radicals. Paper presented at<br />
the 5th International Conference on mercury as aglobal pollutant, Rio de Janeiro, 1999.<br />
35. Calvert, J.G. and Lindberg, S.E. A modelling study of the mechanism of the halogen-oxygenmercury<br />
homogeneous reactions in the troposphere during the Arctic spring. Submitted to<br />
Atmospheric Environment 2003.<br />
36. Richter, A. Wittrock, F. Eisinger, M. and Burrows, J.P. Geophys. Res. Lett., (1998) 25, 2683-<br />
2686.<br />
9
Figures<br />
Summit<br />
Fig. 1a Greenland with the location<br />
of Station Nord.<br />
Ozone, ppbv<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1999<br />
Station Nord<br />
2000<br />
Fig. 2 Hourly ozone mixing ratios and weekly concentration of fBr measured from 1999 to 2002 at Station<br />
Nord, Northeast Greenland. GEM is measured in the period from 25 September 1999 to 23 August 2000; 14<br />
February 2001 to 23 August 2001 and 26 April to 29 June 2002.<br />
2001<br />
Time<br />
50 m<br />
100 m<br />
glacier<br />
Fig. 1b The position of the air monitoring site Flyger’s Hytte at Station Nord.<br />
Ozone<br />
GEM<br />
1/10*fBr<br />
2002<br />
2003<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
GEM,Br, ng/m 3<br />
km<br />
10
GEM, ng/m 3<br />
Fig 3. GEM against ozone concentrations at Station Nord, Northeast Greenland including a regression line<br />
obtained by orthogonal regression analysis. Data was selected from Fig. 2 where at least 3 consecutive<br />
concentrations were decreasing on both ozone and GEM and where the initial GEM concentration was above<br />
0.4 ng/m 3 . Only data from 2000 and 2001 were used as high concentrations in 2002 indicates the presence of<br />
other processes than in 2000 and 2001.<br />
ln([GEM] 0/[GEM] t)<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
-0.5<br />
4.00<br />
3.50<br />
3.00<br />
2.50<br />
2.00<br />
1.50<br />
1.00<br />
0.50<br />
y = 0.039x - 0.095<br />
R 2 = 0.800<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Ozone, ppbv<br />
y = 1.437x + 0.006<br />
R 2 = 0.901<br />
0.00<br />
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50<br />
ln([ozone] 0/[ozone] t)<br />
2.00 2.50 3.00<br />
Fig. 4. The natural logarithm to the relative concentrations of GEM and ozone during Depletion episodes in<br />
2000 and 2001. The regression analysis is carried out by orthogonal regression analysis. Only censored<br />
data are included where three consecutive measurements of both ozone and GEM are decreasing and where<br />
the initial concentration of GEM is larger than 0.4 ng/m 3 .<br />
11
Table 1. The calculated reaction rate constants for the reactions between GEM and Br and Cl based on Fig. 4 and the reaction rate<br />
of Cl and Br with ozone (28). The rate constants obtained in this study are calculated using a reaction rate for ozone at 233 K and<br />
263 to be representative for the conditions in Arctic.<br />
Reactant 10<br />
*Correct within a factor 3<br />
-12 cm 3 molec -1 sec -1 Kelvin Reference<br />
Br 0.8 233 This Study<br />
Br 1.2 263 This study<br />
Br 0.2 ± 0.08 295 34<br />
Br 0.3* 120-170 30<br />
Br 3.2 ± 0.4 298 31<br />
Cl 14 233 This Study<br />
Cl 16 263 This study<br />
Cl 15* 120-170 29<br />
Cl 10 ± 4 298 31<br />
5<br />
4.5<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
01-09-1999<br />
3 hours lifetime<br />
10 hours lifetime<br />
no depletion<br />
observations<br />
01-11-1999<br />
01-01-2000<br />
01-03-2000<br />
01-05-2000<br />
01-07-2000<br />
01-09-2000<br />
01-11-2000<br />
01-01-2001<br />
Fig- 5 Comparisons between observed (black curve) of GEM and calculated daily means of Hg 0 for three model versions, one<br />
without depletion (orange), two with depletion, where blue curve is with 3 hours lifetime and red curve with 10 hours lifetime<br />
during the depletion.<br />
01-03-2001<br />
01-05-2001<br />
01-07-2001<br />
01-09-2001<br />
01-11-2001<br />
01-01-2002<br />
01-03-2002<br />
01-05-2002<br />
01-07-2002<br />
12
Fig. 6 Comparison of measured surface BrO column from the GOME satellite and the calculated concentrations of RGM for the<br />
Spring 2000.<br />
14
ug Hg/m 2 /year<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
without depletion<br />
NOR BAR ALE THU SPI NUU FAE DEN<br />
TPM(Emitted)<br />
TPM(chemical)<br />
RGM<br />
ug Hg/m 2 /year<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
With depletion<br />
NOR BAR ALE THU SPI NUU FAE DEN<br />
TPM(Emitted)<br />
TPM(chemical)<br />
Fig. 7. Total deposition of Mercury in µg Hg/m 2 /year divided into deposition of Reactive Gaseous Mercury, chemically produced<br />
particulate mercury and directly emitted particulate mercury for two different model runs: without depletion (left) and with depletion<br />
(right), and for 8 different localities: Station Nord, Greenland (NOR), Barrow, Alaska (BAR), Alert, Canada (ALE), Thule (THU),<br />
Greenland, Spitzbergen, Norway (SPI), Nuuk area, Greenland (NUU), Faeroe Island (FAE) and Denmark (DEN)<br />
Fig. 8 The total annual average deposition of mercury without Arctic mercury depletion (left) and with (right) in µg Hg/m 2 /year<br />
for the years 1999 and 2000. The total annual deposition north of the polar circle is indicated as well.<br />
RGM<br />
15
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 4: Goodsite, M.E., Plane, J. Skov, H. 2003. A theoretical study of the oxidation of Hg 0 to HgBr2<br />
in the troposphere. Submitted to Environmental Science and technology, June 2003.
SUBMITTED TO<br />
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY<br />
A theoretical study of the oxidation of Hg 0 to HgBr2 in the troposphere<br />
M. E. Goodsite, 1,3* J. M. C. Plane, 2 and H. Skov 1<br />
1. National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Atmospheric Environment,<br />
Roskilde Denmark<br />
2. University of East Anglia, School of Environmental Sciences, Norwich, United Kingdom<br />
*Corresponding author, contact information:<br />
University of Southern Denmark, Department of Chemistry, Odense, Denmark<br />
Campusvej 55<br />
DK-5230 Odense M<br />
Denmark<br />
Tel. (45) 6550 2557<br />
Fax. (45) 6615 8780<br />
Email: meg@chem.sdu.dk<br />
3. M.E.G. present address: University of Southern Denmark, Department of Chemistry,<br />
Odense, Denmark<br />
Submitted June 30 th 2003<br />
Abstract<br />
The oxidation of elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) to the divalent gaseous mercury dibromide (HgBr2) has<br />
been proposed to account for the removal of Hg 0 during depletion events in the springtime Arctic.<br />
The mechanism of this process is explored in this paper by theoretical calculations of the relevant<br />
rate coefficients. Rice-Ramsberger-Kassel-Marcus (RRKM) theory, together with ab initio<br />
quantum calculations where required, are used to estimate the recombination rate coefficients of<br />
Hg with Br, I and OH; the thermal dissociation rate coefficient of HgBr; and the recombination<br />
rate coefficients of HgBr with Br, I, OH and O2. It is shown that a mechanism based on the initial<br />
recombination of Hg with Br, followed by addition of a second radical (Br, I or OH) in<br />
competition with thermal dissociation of HgBr, is able to account for the observed rate of Hg 0<br />
removal, both in Arctic depletion events and at lower latitudes.<br />
1
Introduction<br />
The perennial oxidation of mercury in the Arctic, which occurs simultaneously with the<br />
post solar sunrise destruction of ozone (1), potentially doubles the loading of mercury to the Arctic<br />
(2). These atmospheric mercury depletion episodes, AMDEs, were discovered in 1995 at Alert in<br />
the Canadian Arctic (1), and have since been observed at circum-Arctic locations, the Antarctic,<br />
and sub-polar locations near sea ice (3 and citations therein). Tarasick and Bottenheim (4) have<br />
noted that the frequency of occurrence of boundary-layer ozone depletion episodes has increased<br />
since the 1960’s, particularly at Resolute in the Canadian Arctic (the only site with a sufficiently<br />
long record for proper trend analysis). Those authors postulate that this increase could have arisen<br />
from of an increase in open leads in the Arctic ice cover, possibly because of climate change<br />
induced by increasing levels of greenhouse gases. Furthermore, the increase in frequency of ozone<br />
depletion events may explain the increase in mercury levels observed in Arctic biota over the last<br />
few decades (4).<br />
The current knowledge of AMDEs is summarised in (3). It is clearly important to<br />
understand the detailed mechanism of mercury oxidation, so that transport and deposition models<br />
can be properly parameterised. Mercury exists in the atmosphere primarily in gaseous elemental<br />
form, Hg 0 , which has an atmospheric residence time of approximately 1 year, allowing it to be<br />
globally transported (5,6,7). Hg 0 can thus be transported to the polar regions, where it is removed<br />
from the boundary layer during an MADE with an e-folding lifetime of less than 10 hrs, being<br />
converted to an inorganic oxidised gaseous mercury compound HgXY (2,3). This compound,<br />
which is commonly referred to as reactive gaseous mercury, RGM, is operationally determined in<br />
the Arctic. The common method for measuring RGM is by collection onto a KCl-coated annular<br />
denuder, followed by the pyrolytic reduction of the captured RGM to Hg 0 (8). This technique<br />
results in information about the composition of the HgXY family being lost. A number of<br />
environmental conditions favourable for AMDEs at high latitudes have been identified. These<br />
2
include: a marine/maritime location; calm weather, low wind speeds, and non-turbulent airflow;<br />
the existence of a temperature inversion; sunlight; and sub-zero temperatures (9). These<br />
conditions are also favourable to the photochemically initiated heterogeneous production of<br />
halogen atoms (Br and Cl) and halogen oxide radicals (BrO and ClO), which are assumed to be<br />
involved in the mercury oxidative mechanism (9,10,11). BrO is produced in large quantities (> 20<br />
pptv) after polar sunrise in the marine boundary layer, through the so-called “bromine explosion”<br />
(4, 12, 13). Gas-phase HOBr reacts with a Br - ion in the saline sea ice surface to yield Br2, which<br />
is then photolysed. The resulting Br atoms react with O3 to form BrO, which in turn react with<br />
HO2 radicals to regenerate two HOBr, and the cycle repeats.<br />
Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the oxidation of gaseous elemental<br />
mercury to RGM (10,11). These include the reactions between Hg 0 and halogen oxides or<br />
halogen atoms to produce HgO, HgBr2 and HgCl2:<br />
Br (Cl) + O3 → ClO (BrO) + O2 (1)<br />
BrO (ClO) + Hg → HgO + Br (Cl) (2)<br />
Hg + Br (Cl) → HgBr (HgCl) →→ HgBr2 (HgCl2) (3)<br />
and the possible role of oxidants such as OH, HO2, O( 1 D and 3 P), and NO3 that are associated with<br />
high levels of NO resulting from photodenitrification processes in the snowpack (14). A recent<br />
review of the atmospheric chemistry of mercury can be found in (15).<br />
In this paper we will consider the following mechanism for producing HgBrY:<br />
Hg + Br (+ M) → HgBr (M = third body) (4)<br />
HgBr (+ M) → Hg + Br (-4)<br />
HgBr + Y (+ M) → HgBrY (Y = Br, I, OH, O2 etc.) (5)<br />
3
Ariya et al. (11) have shown recently that reaction 4, the recombination reaction between Hg and<br />
Br, is surprisingly fast, and so this is our prime candidate to initiate the oxidation of Hg 0 . However,<br />
the analogous reaction of atomic I may also be important, following observations of active iodine<br />
oxide chemistry in the mid- and low-latitude marine boundary layer (16, 17). Bauer et al. (18)<br />
have recently reported that the reaction Hg + OH is very slow, although two previous studies<br />
obtained rate coefficients for this reaction that varied by 2 orders of magnitude. We will therefore<br />
investigate the reactions of Hg with both I and OH in this paper. In contrast, the concentration of<br />
atomic Cl is extremely low (
Theoretical calculations<br />
Table 1. Optimised geometries and molecular parameters for HgBr, HgI, HgOH, HgBr2, HgBrI,<br />
HgBrOH and HgBrO2, calculated at the B3LYP/CEP-121G level of theory. Experimental values,<br />
where available, are given in parentheses<br />
Species (term<br />
symbol)<br />
HgBr( 2 Σ)<br />
Geometry a Dipole<br />
r(Hg-Br) = 2.69<br />
[2.62 f ]<br />
HgI( 2 Σ) r(Hg-I) = 2.89<br />
[2.81 g ]<br />
HgOH( 2 A′) r(Hg-O) = 2.25<br />
r(O-H) = 0.99<br />
∠Hg-O-H = 106.8 o<br />
HgBr2( 1 Σg) r(Hg-Br) = 2.08<br />
∠Br-Hg-Br = 180 o<br />
HgBrI( 1 Σ)<br />
r(Hg-Br) = 2.08<br />
∠Br-Hg-Br = 180 o<br />
HgBrOH( 1 A′) r(Hg-Br) = 2.49<br />
r(Hg-O) = 2.04<br />
r(O-H) = 0.98<br />
∠Br-Hg-O = 174.9 o<br />
∠Hg-O-H = 113.0 o<br />
∠Br-Hg-O-H =<br />
180.0 o<br />
HgBrO2 ( 2 A) r(Hg-Br) = 2.50<br />
r(Hg-O) = 2.145<br />
r(O-O) = 1.37<br />
∠Br-Hg-O = 179.3 o<br />
∠Hg-O-O = 114.6 o<br />
∠Br-Hg-O-O =<br />
162.9 o<br />
Moment b<br />
Rotational<br />
constants c<br />
Vibrational<br />
frequencies d<br />
Bond energy e<br />
3.10 1.23 [1.30 f ] 146 [187 f ] D0(Hg-Br) = 63.8<br />
[74.9 f ]<br />
2.67 0.776<br />
[0.821 g ]<br />
1.89 600, 6.24,<br />
6.18<br />
106 [125 g ] D0(Hg-I) = 46.3<br />
[34.7 g ]<br />
297, 705,<br />
3536<br />
0.0 0.514 58, 58, 109,<br />
269<br />
0.82 0.376 52, 52, 164,<br />
250<br />
1.97 549, 1.07,<br />
1.07<br />
1.15 30.3, 0.78,<br />
0.76<br />
99, 115,<br />
235, 555,<br />
864, 3634<br />
53, 89, 188,<br />
250, 455,<br />
1070<br />
D0(Hg-OH) = 39.4<br />
D0(HgBr-Br) = 247<br />
D0(HgBr-I) = 227<br />
D0(HgBr-OH) =<br />
226<br />
D0(HgBr-O2) = 30<br />
a Bond lengths in Å; b In Debye (= 3.336 x 10 -30 Cm). c In GHz. d In cm -1 . e In kJ mol -1 . f Ref. 21.<br />
g Ref. 22<br />
5
Table 1 lists the binding energies and molecular parameters required to apply RRKM<br />
theory to reactions 4, -4 and 5. Because there does not appear to be accurate experimental data<br />
available on the HgXY species, we have calculated these ab initio using the hybrid density<br />
functional / Hartree-Fock B3LYP method from within the Gaussian 98 suite of programs (23).<br />
The molecular geometries were first optimised using the Stevens-Basch-Krauss triple-split CEP-<br />
121G basis set (24). This is a standard basis set for calculations on post-third row atoms: the inner<br />
electrons on the heavy atoms are treated using effective core potentials, and some relativistic<br />
effects are included. The resulting geometries, dipole moments, rotational constants and<br />
vibrational frequencies are listed in Table 1, together with the relevant bond energies. The peroxy<br />
radical HgBrO2 with doublet spin multiplicity is found to be 30 kJ mol -1 more stable than the<br />
quartet form. Theoretical calculations on HgBr and HgI are also included in the Table, and<br />
compared with accurate experimental bond energies, bond lengths and vibrational frequencies.<br />
The agreement is quite satisfactory, especially for the bond energies and bond lengths, bearing in<br />
mind the heavy nuclei in these molecules.<br />
We now apply RRKM theory, using a master equation (ME) formalism (25) that we have<br />
applied extensively to recombination reactions (26, 27). Briefly, a recombination reaction is<br />
considered to proceed via the following mechanism (exemplified by reaction 4 with atomic Br):<br />
Hg + Br → HgBr * (4.1)<br />
HgBr * → Hg + Br (4.2)<br />
HgBr * + M → HgBr + M (M = N2) (4.3)<br />
where HgBr* denotes that the nascent HgBr formed in reaction 4.1 has sufficient internal energy to<br />
dissociate back to the reactants (reaction 4.2). The energy of the adduct HgBr was first divided<br />
into a contiguous set of grains (width 30 cm -1 ), each containing a bundle of rovibrational states of<br />
average energy, Ei. Each grain was then assigned a microcanonical rate coefficient for<br />
dissociation, k-4,i. The ME describes the evolution with time of the grain populations<br />
d<br />
i ( t )<br />
dt<br />
ρ<br />
∑<br />
= Pij<br />
j ( t ) − i ( t ) − k − 4, i i<br />
j<br />
ρ<br />
ωρ ρ ω<br />
( t ) +<br />
R<br />
i<br />
(I)<br />
6
where Ri is the rate of population of HgBr(Ei) via reaction 4.1, ω is the frequency of collisions<br />
between HgBr * and N2, and Pij is the probability of transfer of HgBr from grain j to grain i on<br />
collision with N2. The individual Pij were estimated using the exponential down model (28). The<br />
average energy for downward transitions (i < j), down, was set to be 400 cm -1 for N2 (28), and<br />
assumed to be independent of temperature. The parameters σ and ε /k, which describe the<br />
intermolecular potential between HgBr and N2 from which ω is calculated, were set to typical<br />
values of 4 Å and 400 K, respectively (28). For upward transitions where j > i, Pij was calculated<br />
by detailed balance. In order to simulate irreversible stabilization of HgBr via reaction 4.3, an<br />
absorbing boundary was set 24 kJ mol -1 below the energy of the reactants, so that collisional<br />
energization from the boundary to the threshold was highly improbable. The rate of population of<br />
grain i, Ri, is given by detailed balance between reactions 4.1 and 4.2:<br />
Ri = krec,∞ [Hg] [Br] ηi (II)<br />
where krec,∞ is the limiting high-pressure association rate coefficient (reaction 4.1) and<br />
η i =<br />
k − 4 , i f i<br />
∑ k − 4 , i f i<br />
i<br />
(III)<br />
where fi is the equilibrium Boltzmann distribution of HgBr(Ei).<br />
The microcanonical rate coefficients for dissociation of HgBr were determined using<br />
inverse Laplace transformation (25), which links k-1(Ei) directly to krec,∞. In the present case, krec,∞<br />
was expressed in the Arrhenius form A ∞ exp(-E ∞ /R T). Assuming that collisions between Hg and<br />
Br are governed by the long-range attractive dispersion force, then A ∞ = 1.67 x 10 -10 cm 3 molecule -<br />
1 -1 ∞ -1<br />
s and E = -423 J mol .<br />
The microcanonical rate coefficient for dissociation is then given by<br />
∞<br />
(<br />
i<br />
3/<br />
2 E −E<br />
−∆H<br />
∞ o 0.<br />
5<br />
− ∆H0<br />
) − x]<br />
∞ o<br />
A 2πµ<br />
)<br />
i<br />
0<br />
k−4, i =<br />
N p(<br />
x)[(<br />
Ei<br />
E<br />
3 ∫<br />
−<br />
N(<br />
E ) Γ(<br />
1.<br />
5)<br />
h 0<br />
where the density of states of HgBr at energy Ei, N(Ei), was calculated using a combination of the<br />
Beyer-Swinehart algorithm for the vibrational modes (including a correction for anharmonicity)<br />
dx<br />
(V)<br />
7
and a classical densities of states treatment for the rotational modes; Np(Ei) is the convoluted<br />
density of states of Hg and Br; ∆H0 o is the Hg-Br bond energy; and µ is the reduced mass of Hg<br />
and Br. The ME was expressed in matrix form and then solved to yield k4, the bimolecular<br />
recombination rate constant at a specified pressure and temperature. The dissociation rate<br />
coefficient, k5, was calculated by detailed balance with k4. Note that for these calculations of k4<br />
and k5, the experimental parameters in Table 1 were employed.<br />
Fig. 1 illustrates the calculated rate coefficients k4, k5 and k6 at a pressure of 1 atm N2 over<br />
the temperature range 180 – 400 K. This shows that k4 and k6 have small negative temperature<br />
dependences, as expected for recombination reactions. In contrast, k5 has a large positive<br />
activation energy, approximately equal to the Hg-Br bond energy. The rate coefficients at 1 atm<br />
pressure are:<br />
k4(Hg + Br → HgBr, 180 – 400 K) = 1.1 x 10 -12 (T / 298 K) -2.37 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1<br />
k5(HgBr → Hg + Br, 180 – 400 K) = 1.2 x 10 10 exp(-8357 / T) s -1<br />
k6(HgBr + Br → HgBr2, 180 – 400 K) = 2.5 x 10 -10 (T / 298 K) -0.57 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1<br />
Reaction 6 is close to the high-pressure limit at 1 atm. Inspection of Table 1 shows that atomic I<br />
and OH bond only slightly less strongly to HgBr, so the rate coefficients for these reactions are<br />
very similar to k6, essentially at their high-pressure limits. Note that the products HgBr2, HgBrI<br />
and HgBrOH (Table 1) are extremely stable against thermal dissociation at temperatures below<br />
400 K.<br />
For the recombination reactions of Hg with I and OH, and the dissociation of HgI and<br />
HgOH, application of RRKM theory using the data in Table 1 yields (pressure = 1 atm N2):<br />
k(Hg + I → HgI, 180 – 400 K) = 4.0 x 10 -13 (T / 298 K) -2.38 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1<br />
k(Hg + OH → HgOH, 180 – 400 K) = 3.2 x 10 -13 (T /298 K) -3.06 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1<br />
k(HgI → Hg + I, 180 – 400 K) = 3.0 x 10 9 exp(-3742 / T) s -1<br />
k(HgOH → Hg + OH, 180 – 400 K) = 2.7 x 10 9 exp(-4061 / T) s -1<br />
The temperature dependences of these four reactions are also illustrated in Figure 1.<br />
8
Discussion<br />
Figure 1 demonstrates several important points with respect to the oxidation of Hg. First,<br />
the recombination of Hg with Br is surprisingly fast for an atom-atom recombination. The reason<br />
is the high density of rovibrational states arising from the low vibrational frequency and small<br />
rotational constant of HgBr (Table 1). Interestingly, the theoretical estimate of k4 is about a factor<br />
of 3 lower than the recent experimental measurement (11). In fact, we can only match the<br />
experimental value if the bond energy of HgBr is increased to over 100 kJ mol -1 , about 30 kJ mol -1<br />
higher than the current experimental measurement of 74.9 ± 4 kJ mol -1 (22, 29). However, the<br />
recent experimental estimate of k4 was a relative rate measurement that required several significant<br />
correction factors (11). Since the vibrational frequency and rotational constant of HgBr used in the<br />
present application of RRKM theory are known precisely from laser induced fluorescence<br />
spectroscopy in a supersonic jet (22), we prefer the theoretical estimate of k4. Another<br />
experimental measurement of this rate coefficient would clearly be very desirable. In the case of<br />
reaction 6, the addition of the second bromine to HgBr is predicted to be a very fast reaction,<br />
proceeding close to the high pressure limit (essentially the collision number) at atmospheric<br />
pressure.<br />
The second point that emerges from Figure 1 is that the recombination reactions of Hg with<br />
I and OH are a factor of 3 to 4 times slower than reaction 4. The principal reason is the smaller<br />
binding energies of HgI and HgOH. It should be noted that there is a very large discrepancy in the<br />
literature regarding k(Hg + OH), with estimates ranging from 8.7 x 10 -14 to 1.6 x 10 -11 cm 3<br />
molecule -1 s -1 at close to 300 K (18). The current theoretical calculations are in good agreement<br />
with the most recent upper limit of 1.2 x 10 -13 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 (18). Note, however, that the<br />
lifetime of HgOH is only 280 µs at 298 K, so that a true kinetic measurement of the recombination<br />
reaction would be difficult to achieve in practice.<br />
9
The third point demonstrated in Figure 1 is that the thermal dissociation of HgBr is more<br />
than 10 6 times slower than the thermal dissociation of HgI or HgOH, at temperatures below 300 K.<br />
This enormous difference arises from the stronger Hg-Br bond. The dissociation lifetimes of HgI<br />
and HgOH are less than 1 s at temperatures above 200 K. Hence, these species will not play a<br />
significant role in Hg 0 removal.<br />
We therefore conclude that Hg 0 is oxidised to Hg II by recombination with Br. There is then<br />
a competition between further addition of Br to form HgBr2, or thermal decomposition of HgBr.<br />
The addition of I to HgBr may also be significant in some marine locations; however, the OH<br />
concentration in the clean marine boundary layer (typically less than 10 6 cm -3 ), is probably too low<br />
for OH addition to HgBr to be significant. As shown in Table 1, the addition of O2 to form<br />
HgBrO2 will not be an important process, because this peroxy radical is so weakly bound that it<br />
will dissociate rapidly even at Arctic temperatures.<br />
The lifetime of Hg 0 , against conversion to HgBr2, is then given by:<br />
k5 + k6[ Br]<br />
τ =<br />
2<br />
kk[ Br]<br />
4 6<br />
Figure 2 illustrates τ as a function of [Br] and temperature. During springtime in the Arctic, the<br />
temperature ranges from about 230 to 260 K. During Hg depletion events [Br] is estimated to vary<br />
from 0.2 ppt, when τ will range from 35 to 60 hours, to 6 ppt, when τ will be only 0.7 to 1.5 hours<br />
(30). A typically observed 10 hr lifetime of Hg (2,10) would correspond to [Br] = 0.7 ppt at an<br />
“average” temperature of 245 K.<br />
At temperatures above 280 K, k2 becomes very fast and so τ increases significantly. In the<br />
mid-latitude marine boundary layer, where the concentration of BrO has recently been measured to<br />
be around 2 ppt during daytime [A. Saiz-Lopez and J. M. C. Plane, University of East Anglia, pers.<br />
comm.], the atomic Br concentration under photochemical steady-state will be ≤ 0.1 ppt. This is<br />
(VI)<br />
10
similar to the atomic I (16) and OH concentrations, so that these radicals may also play a role at<br />
mid-latitudes, in contrast to the Arctic. Nevertheless, Figure 2 shows that under these conditions τ<br />
increases to > 4000 hours. This is in sensible accord with the observed global lifetime of more<br />
than 1 year (5,6,7), bearing in mind that HgBr has a rich UV/visible spectroscopy (31) and may<br />
therefore have a significant photodissociation rate in the troposphere, which would extend τ even<br />
more. Note that if the measured value of k4 (11) is used in place of the present theoretical estimate<br />
(and k5 is estimated by detailed balance to maintain the equilibrium between HgBr and Hg + Br),<br />
then the lifetimes calculated by equation (VI) are little changed.<br />
In conclusion, we have shown that a mechanism based on the initial recombination of Hg<br />
with Br, followed by addition of a second radical in competition with thermal dissociation, is able<br />
to account for the observed rate of Hg 0 removal, both in Arctic depletion events and on a global<br />
scale.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The Authors wish to thank the Danish Cooperation for Environment in the Arctic (DANCEA), the<br />
Danish Research Agency (SNF), and the U.K. National Environmental Research Council (NERC).<br />
M.G. is supported by a <strong>COGCI</strong> graduate research studentship from the Danish Research Agency<br />
and the Department of Atmospheric Environment, NERI-DK.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
1. Schroeder, W. H.; Anlauf, K. G.; Barrie, L. A.; Lu, J. Y.; Steffen, A.; Schneeberger, D. R.;<br />
Berg, T. Nature 1998, 394, 331-332.<br />
2. Skov, H., Christensen, J., Goodsite, M.E., Heidam, N.Z., Jensen, B., Wåhlin, P., and<br />
Geernaert, G. Environ Sci. Technol. (submitted for publication).<br />
3. Schroeder, W.H., Steffen, A., Scott, K., Bender, T., Prestbo, E., Ebinghaus, R., Lu, J.Y.,<br />
Lindberg, S.E. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37, 2551-2555.<br />
4. Tarasick, D.W., and Bottenheim, J.W. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2002, 2, 197–205.<br />
5. Slemr, F.; Schuster, G.; Seiler, W. J. Atmos. Chem. 1985, 3, 407-434.<br />
6. Schroeder, W. H.; Jackson, R. A. Chemosphere 1987, 16, 183-199.<br />
11
7. Lamborg, C. H.; Fitzgerald, W.; O'Donnell, J.; Torgersen, T. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta<br />
2002, 66 (7), 1105-1118.<br />
8. Landis, M. S.; Stevens, R. K.; Schaedlich, F.; Prestbo, E. M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002,<br />
36, 3000-3009.<br />
9. Lu, J. Y.; Schroeder, W. H.; Barrie, L. A.; Steffen, A.; Welch, H. E.; Martin, K.; Lockhart,<br />
W. L.; Hunt, R. V.; Boila, G.; Richter, A. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2001, 28, 3219-3222.<br />
10. Lindberg, S. E.; Brooks, S.; Lin, C.-J.; Scott, K. J.; Landis, M. S.; Stevens, R. K.; Goodsite,<br />
M.; Richter A. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1245-1256.<br />
11. Ariya, P.A., Khalizov, A., Gidas, A. Jour. Phys. Chem. A. 2002, 106, 7310-7320.<br />
12. Barrie, L.A., Platt, U. Tellus. 1997, 49 B, 450-454.<br />
13. Foster, K.L., Plastridge, R.A., Bottenheim, J.W., Shepson, P.B., Finlayson-Pitts, B.J.,<br />
Spicer, C.W. Science. 2001, 291, 471-474.<br />
14. Temme, C., Einax, J.W., Ebinghaus, R. Environ. Sci. Technol, 2003, 37 (1), 22 -31.<br />
15. Lin, C.-J., Pehkonen, S.O. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 2067-2079<br />
16. McFiggans, G., Plane, J. M. C., Allan, B. J., Carpenter, L. J., Coe, H., O'Dowd, C. J.<br />
Geophys. Res., 2000, 105, 14371-14385.<br />
17. Allan, B. J., Plane, J. M. C., McFiggans, G. Geophys. Res. Lett., 2001, 28, 1945-1948.<br />
18. Bauer, D., D’Ottone, L., Campuzaon-Jost, P., Hynes, A. J. J. Photochem. Photobiology A –<br />
chemistry, 2003, 157, 247-256.<br />
19. McFiggans G., Cox, R. A., Mossinger, J. C., Allan, B. J., Plane J. M. C., J. Geophys. Res.-<br />
Atmospheres , 2002, 107, 4271-4280.<br />
20. Steinfeld, J. I, Francisco, J. S., Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetics and Dynamics, Prentice<br />
Hall, Hew Jersey, 1989.<br />
21. Lipson, R. H., Jordan, K. J., Bascal, H. A., J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 98, 959-967.<br />
22. Jordan, K .J., Bascal, H. A., Lipson, R. H., Melchior, M., J. Molec. Spectrosc., 1993, 159,<br />
144-155.<br />
23. Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J.<br />
R., Zakrzewski, V. G., Montgomery, J. A. Jr., Stratmann, R. E., Burant, J. C., Dapprich, S.,<br />
Millam, J. M., Daniels, A. D., Kudin, K. N., Strain, M. C., Farkas, O., Tomasi, J., Barone,<br />
V., Cossi, M., Cammi, R., Mennucci, B., Pomelli, C., Adamo, C., Clifford, S., Ochterski, J.,<br />
Petersson, G. A., Ayala, P. Y., Cui, Q., Morokuma, K., Malick, D. K., Rabuck, A. D.,<br />
Raghavachari, K., Foresman, J. B., Cioslowski, J., Ortiz, J. V., Baboul, A. G., Stefanov, B.<br />
B., Liu, G., Liashenko, A., Piskorz, P., Komaromi, I., Gomperts, R., Martin, R. L., Fox, D.<br />
J., Keith, T., Al-Laham, M. A., Peng, C. Y., Nanayakkara, A., Gonzalez, C., Challacombe,<br />
M., Gill, P. M. W., Johnson, B., Chen, W., Wong, M. W., Andres, J. L., Gonzalez, C.,<br />
Head-Gordon, M., Replogle, E. S., Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, Revision A.7, Gaussian, Inc.,<br />
Pittsburgh PA, 1998.<br />
24. Cundari, T. R., Stevens, W. J., J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5555-5565.<br />
12
25. De Avillez Pereira, R., Baulch, D. L., Pilling, M. J., Robertson, S. H., Zeng, G. J. Phys.<br />
Chem. 1997, 101, 9681-9690.<br />
26. Rollason, R. J., Plane, J. M. C. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2, 2335-2343.<br />
27. Self D. E., Plane, J. M. C. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 1407-1418.<br />
28. Gilbert, R. G., Smith, S. C. Theory of Unimolecular and Recombination Reactions,<br />
Blackwell, Oxford, 1990.<br />
29. Handbook of Physics and Chemistry, ed. Lide, D.R., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 78th. edn.,<br />
1997.<br />
30. Tuckermann, M. Ackermann, R. Gölz, C. Lorenzen-Schmidt, H. Senne, T. Stutz, J, Trost,<br />
B. Unold, W. and Platt, U. Tellus, (1997) 49B, 533-555.<br />
31. NIST Chemistry Webbo ok, http://webbook.nist.gov/.<br />
13
Figure 1.<br />
k rec / cm 3 molecule -1 s -1<br />
10 -9<br />
10 -10<br />
10 -11<br />
10 -12<br />
10 -13<br />
200 250 300 350 400<br />
HgBr + Br recombination<br />
HgOH dissociation<br />
Hg + I recombination<br />
Hg + OH recombination<br />
HgI dissociation<br />
HgBr dissociation<br />
Hg + Br recombination<br />
200 250 300 350 400<br />
T / K<br />
Figure 1. Rate coefficients calculated using RRKM theory, plotted as a function of temperature for<br />
10 6<br />
10 4<br />
10 2<br />
10 0<br />
10 -2<br />
10 -4<br />
10 -6<br />
10 -8<br />
10 -10<br />
10 -12<br />
10 -14<br />
the recombination of Hg with Br, I and OH, and of HgBr with Br (solid lines, left-hand ordinate);<br />
and for the thermal dissociation of HgBr, HgI and HgOH (broken lines, right-hand ordinate).<br />
k diss / s -1<br />
14
Figure 2.<br />
Temperature / K<br />
300<br />
280<br />
260<br />
240<br />
220<br />
200<br />
180<br />
10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000<br />
2000<br />
1000 900 800 700 600 500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
706050<br />
40<br />
0.1 1 10<br />
300<br />
80<br />
706050<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
100<br />
90<br />
30<br />
200<br />
20<br />
80 70605040<br />
30<br />
109<br />
8 7 6<br />
5<br />
109<br />
8 7 6<br />
4<br />
20<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
1<br />
0.9<br />
0.8<br />
280<br />
260<br />
240<br />
220<br />
200<br />
180<br />
0.1 1 10<br />
[Br] / ppt<br />
Figure 2. Contour plot of the lifetime in hours for Hg 0 oxidation to HgBr2, plotted as a function of<br />
[Br] and temperature.<br />
3<br />
5<br />
2<br />
4<br />
3<br />
0.7<br />
2<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.7<br />
0.3<br />
15
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 5: Skov, H., Nielsdóttir, M.C., Goodsite, M.E., Christensen, J., Skjøth, C.A., Geernaert, G.,<br />
Hertel, O. Olsen, J., Measurements and Modelling of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) on<br />
the Faroe Islands; a case study of the difficulties of measuring GEM. Accepted Asian<br />
Chemistry Letters (2003).
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
Measurements and Modelling of gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) on the<br />
Faroe Islands; a case study of the difficulties of measuring GEM<br />
H.Skov 1,# , M.C.Nielsdóttir 2 , M.E.Goodsite 3 , J.Christensen 1 , C.A.Skjøth 1 , G.Geernaert 4 , O. Hertel 1 ,<br />
J.Olsen 5 .<br />
1 National Environmental Research Institute. Frederiksborgvej 399, DK 4000 Roskilde, Denmark<br />
# Corresponding author, e-mail Address: Henrik.Skov@DMU.DK<br />
2 Present address: University of East Anglia, Norwich England<br />
3 Present address: Department of Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK 5230 Odense<br />
M, Denmark<br />
4 Present address: Inst. of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Los Alamos National Laboratory, MS C-305<br />
Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA<br />
5 Food and Environmental Agency, Faroe Islands<br />
___________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Gaseous Elemental Mercury (GEM) in the atmosphere was measured on the Faroe Islands from May 2000 to<br />
March 2001. The measured data were analysed together with basic meteorology, trajectories, and modelled GEM<br />
concentrations using the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM). The measured air concentration time<br />
series shows periods with elevated (>1.5 ng/m 3 of Hg, the generally accepted global background average)<br />
mercury concentrations. We determined that there are two potential natural causes for the higher than expected<br />
levels: local sources and/or long-range transport. After a detailed analysis, it was determined that neither local nor<br />
long range sources were sufficiently responsible for the observed levels and the pattern could not be adequately<br />
reproduced by the DEHM. Measurement artefacts are the most plausible explanation of much of the measurement<br />
pattern. The nature of the artefact is discussed and recommendation for future measurements of GEM is given.<br />
___________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
This paper is dedicated to Professor Thorvald Pedersen who has just retired from his position at the<br />
Institute of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen. Through the years we have benefited from his<br />
genuine interest and knowledge in spectroscopy and atmospheric chemistry.<br />
1.Introduction<br />
Mercury on the Faroe Islands is of both scientific and public concern due to the high concentrations in<br />
e.g. pilot whales and other higher predators of fish, where up to 3 ppm (µg/g) Hg has been measured 1 .<br />
Furthermore, it has been shown that the present levels of mercury in sea animals also have a negative<br />
effect on the health of the local populations, since these animals are an important food supply 2 . High<br />
concentrations of mercury (up to 700 ng/g) have also been observed in peat cores taken on the Faroe<br />
Islands 3 . The profiles suggest that local geological input does not significantly contribute to the<br />
mercury inventory, so the Hg must be primarily supplied by atmospheric deposition, and that the level<br />
of Hg on the Faroe Islands has through time, been higher than levels reported for other European sites.<br />
However the concentrations cannot be directly linked to atmospheric concentrations or deposition, as<br />
the levels are not only a function of deposition, but also bioaccumulation, the runoff area size and the<br />
geochemistry of the profile and it will therefore be important to quantify the rate of atmospheric<br />
accumulation 3 . It has also been discovered that trout from fish farming activities on the Faroe Islands<br />
also contain unacceptably high levels of mercury 4 . In spite of strong indications of high mercury<br />
exposure to marine food chains and the possible high exposure in terrestrial ecosystems (as implied by<br />
the peat core data), there has not been any study reported to date, which explains the sources<br />
responsible for the high mercury levels and/or how to mitigate the problem.<br />
1
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
The aim of this study is to report a recently collected time series of atmospheric concentrations of<br />
gaseous elemental mercury (GEM) collected during roughly a one year period starting in May 2000,<br />
and to explain the observations by, e.g., exploring relationships between anthropogenic mercury<br />
source regions and deposition to the Faroe Islands. The results are compared with model calculations<br />
using the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM) including scenario calculations. Furthermore<br />
trajectory calculations were carried out using the trajectory model developed for the Atmospheric<br />
Chemistry and Deposition model 5 (ACDEP). The quality of the measurements presented here is<br />
disturbed due to various artefacts and these artefacts are discussed and recommendations are given for<br />
modifications that will prevent such artefacts in future measurements.<br />
2. Experimental<br />
The measurements were performed with a Tekran Model 2537A Mercury Vapour Analyser. The<br />
instrument is equipped with an internal permeation source ensuring the stability of the measurements<br />
through a daily automatic addition of this span gas as well as zero air. GEM in ambient air is adsorbed<br />
on a gold trap and after sampling the adsorbed mercury is thermally desorbed and detected by Cold<br />
Vapour Atomic Fluorescence Spectrophotometry. The monitor is equipped with two parallel gold<br />
traps, so continuous samples were taken with 5 minutes resolution, which for practical reasons (for<br />
reporting) was averaged to 1 hour mean values. Measurements were carried out based on our<br />
modified version of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Manual for Total Gaseous Mercury<br />
Measurements for the Canadian Atmospheric Mercury Measurement Network 6 . We modified this<br />
SOP based on the equipment and resources that we had available. For example, we did not use heated<br />
inlet lines, and we did not conduct a daily manual calibration of the machine, relying instead upon on<br />
the permeation tube as a secondary standard. The estimated uncertainty from manual calibration,<br />
collection efficiency, repeatability etc. is estimated to 10 % (2 times standard deviation) for values<br />
above 1 ng/m 3 . However, complications significantly effected the measurements on the Faroe Islands.<br />
The very high relative humidity (above 95%) may have affected the measurements (Matthew Landis,<br />
Private communication, 2001, TEKRAN manual p. 2-1) and high sea spray concentrations have in<br />
previous studies been observed to effect the measurements of GEM 7 . These complications<br />
significantly increased the uncertainty of the measurements, as will be discussed.<br />
3. Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model<br />
The concentration of GEM on the Faroe Islands, based on northern hemispheric emissions and<br />
atmospheric transport pathways, was calculated by the Danish Eulerian Hemispheric Model (DEHM),<br />
a 3 dimensional eulerian model. The model is described in detail elsewhere 8,9,10 .<br />
In the current version of DEHM, emissions of anthropogenic mercury are based on the new global<br />
inventory of mercury emissions for 1995 on a 1 o x1 o grid 11 , which includes emissions of Hg 0 , reactive<br />
gaseous mercury and particulate mercury. There are no representations of re-emissions from land and<br />
oceans; instead a background concentration of 1.5 ng/m 3 of Hg 0 is used as the initial concentration and<br />
in the boundary conditions.<br />
The chemical reaction scheme 12 includes 13 mercury species, 3 in the gas-phase (Hg 0 , HgO and<br />
HgCl2), 9 species in the aqueous-phase and 1 in particulate phase.<br />
Two scenario calculations were carried out. In the first scenario, the chemistry described above is<br />
assumed to be valid over the entire Northern Hemisphere. In the second scenario, an additional fast<br />
oxidation rate of Hg 0 to HgO is assumed during the polar sunrise in the Arctic, producing a depletion<br />
2
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
of atmospheric mercury, see later. Therefore, inside the atmospheric boundary layer over sea ice<br />
during sunny conditions, it is assumed that there is an additional first order oxidation rate of ¼ hour -1<br />
converting Hg 0 to HgO. The fast oxidation stops, when surface temperature exceeds -4 o C (the freezing<br />
point saltwater). Removals of Hg 0 are due to the chemistry and the uptake by cloud water.<br />
Dry deposition velocities of the reactive gaseous mercury species (in the model assumed to be HgO<br />
and HgCl2) are based on the resistance method, where the surface resistance similar to HNO3 is used<br />
based on the flux measurements. Dry deposition velocities for RGM have been measured and reported<br />
from Barrow and are similar to those for HNO3 13,14 . Wet deposition of reactive and particulate<br />
mercury is parameterized by using a simple formulation with different in-cloud and below-cloud<br />
scavenging coefficients (see 9 ).<br />
4. Site<br />
The monitor was set up in a residential suburban area on the eastside of Tórshavn, the capital on Faroe<br />
Islands, located 62 o 01’ N and 6 o 47’ W approximately 400 km north of Scotland, 600 km west of<br />
Norway and 500 km east of Iceland. Because of this suburban location, we tested the influence of<br />
possible local sources by examining the time series based on wind direction and concentration. No<br />
correlation between these quantities was found, during both quiescent periods and during higher than<br />
background level episodes, thus allowing us to conclude that any local sources were insignificant.<br />
5. Results<br />
Measurements from May 2000 to March 2001 of GEM are shown in Figure 1. The data vary between<br />
a general level of about 2 ng/m 3 in the beginning of the campaign (in May) decreasing to<br />
approximately 0.5 ng/m 3 in July and August and increasing slightly to approximately in January and<br />
February of about 1.7 ng/m 3 . During the campaign we measured some values peaking at 3.4 ng/m 3 .<br />
For example we observed a notable high concentration episode from June 21 to 25, which was<br />
followed by a period where the concentration levels decreased to values between 0.8 to 1.3 ng/m 3 . The<br />
daily mean temperature in the periods varied from 5.7 0 C in May and June to 12.1 0 C in August. The<br />
average relative humidity was always close to 95%. During the rest of the year the concentrations<br />
slowly increased to a level of 1.7 ng/m 3 in January and February 2001.<br />
3
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
GEM, ng/m3<br />
4.5<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
14-maj-00 3-jul-00 22-aug-00 11-okt-00 30-nov-00<br />
Time<br />
Figure 1 GEM concentrations at Faroe Islands from May 2000 to March 2001. Values are 1 hour averages.<br />
The model calculations of daily average Hg 0 concentrations together with measured daily average GEM<br />
concentrations are shown in Figure 2. Two scenario calculations were carried out; one with mercury<br />
depletion episodes (MDE) in the Arctic and one without. The calculated concentrations without MDE<br />
are close to a constant level of 1.6 ng/m 3 throughout the period. The results of the calculations with<br />
MDE show a decrease in April and June from about 1.4 ng/m 3 without MDE and to 1.0 ng/m 3 with<br />
MDE.<br />
4
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
GEM, ng/m 3<br />
5<br />
4.5<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
3<br />
2.5<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
0.5<br />
Modelled values with MDE<br />
Measured values<br />
Modelled values without MDE<br />
0<br />
01-maj-00 20-jun-00 09-aug-00 28-sep-00 17-nov-00<br />
Day<br />
06-jan-01 25-feb-01 16-apr-01 05-jun-01<br />
Figure 2 Comparison of daily mean GEM concentrations at Faroe Islands measured by a TEKRAN Hg analyser and Hg 0<br />
obtained by DEHM. Modelled values reflect two scenarios: concentrations with a springtime Arctic Mercury Depletion<br />
Event (MDE) and another without MDE.<br />
6. Discussion<br />
The measurements of GEM on the Faroe Islands are comparable in magnitude with the levels in 1999<br />
from Mace Head on the west coast of Ireland 7 and with the values from Harwell an inland location in<br />
southern England in June 1995 to May 1996 15 .<br />
The average concentrations at the three localities are 1.68 ng/m 3 at Mace Head, 1.7 ng/m 3 at Harwell<br />
and 1.4 ng/m 3 on the Faroe Islands. The largest average concentration levels at Harwell and at Mace<br />
Head are practically identical, with the concentrations on Faroe Islands somewhat smaller. It is<br />
generally believed that the background concentration of mercury in the Northern Hemisphere is about<br />
1.5 ng/m 3 and fairly constant. The concentrations at Mace Head are fairly constant for westerly winds;<br />
concentrations are generally elevated when air masses come from Europe. At Harwell the<br />
measurements are much more affected by local sources. The concentrations on the Faroe Islands vary<br />
much more abruptly, which normally indicates problems with the instrument, e.g., due to passivation<br />
of the gold traps. Therefore the central question is if the measurements on Faroe Islands reflect the<br />
actual ambient concentrations or if they are influenced by sensor interference.<br />
Ref. 7 mentioned passivation of the gold traps as a measurement problem at Mace Head caused by sea<br />
spray. The TEKRAN manual notes that low values are generally due to trap passivation since a<br />
passified gold trap has a less active surface area for capturing Hg. A similar complication could be the<br />
reason for the relative low values at Faroe Islands. However 15 reported similar low values at the<br />
inland station where sea spray should be of minor importance.<br />
5
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
If the low values observed on the Faroe Islands are real, one could also speculate that they might be<br />
explained by marine air with significant halogen chemistry (of Br, BrO, Cl, ClO) where GEM is<br />
converted to reactive gaseous mercury (RGM) in a similar way to what is observed in the high Arctic<br />
during polar spring 13,16,17,18,19 . However, efforts must be taken to ensure that passivation of sample<br />
gold cartridges do not occur in the future. Therefore all GEM measurements since Spring 2001 in our<br />
laboratory have been carried out, by sampling through a soda-lime (variable mixture of sodium<br />
hydroxide and calcium oxide/hydroxide, Aldrich 26,643-4) trap (recommended by Matthew S.<br />
Landis, US EPA, private communication, 2001).<br />
Artefacts might also explain the high peak of 3.4 ng/m 3 observed from 21 to 25 June 2000.<br />
Condensation of water in the sample line might work as a trap for mercury, which is liberated<br />
afterwards when the droplets evaporate. The instrument is also sensitive to variation in voltage. At<br />
slightly lower voltages than 220V used in this study, the gold traps are not fully desorbed and there is<br />
carry over of Hg, which will lead to build up of Hg within the instrument (“memory effect”). In fact<br />
there has been a decrease in voltage during periods in Thorshavn over the last years due to the<br />
expansion in the general economy. The voltage decrease can only be hypothesised here as an artefact<br />
as precise information about it is not available.<br />
As an alternate to sampling complications, a possible natural cause of the observed high<br />
concentrations of up to 3.4 ng/m 3 was examined in more detail. The high levels of GEM observed on<br />
the Faroe Islands were initially hypothesised to originate from local anthropogenic sources. We<br />
therefore obtained information from public and private sources by distributing a questionnaire survey.<br />
All questionnaires were returned answered from the small community of Tórshavn. Three potential<br />
sources were identified: the dentists, the hospital and waste incinerators. We discovered that the<br />
dentists send their waste (silver amalgam) to Denmark, where the metal is reused. The hospital<br />
reported that it has eliminated most mercury containing instruments. The little waste that remains is<br />
sent to the waste incinerator. From control measurements made by the incinerator managers, the<br />
concentration of mercury in the flue gas from the waste incinerator is less than 30 µg/m 3 .<br />
Approximately 20 kton/year waste is combusted yearly. Batteries and chemical waste are sent to<br />
Denmark. The position of the waste incinerator and its stack height make it highly unlikely that it can<br />
influence the measured GEM concentrations at our measurement site. Overall, based on our analysis,<br />
we determined that local point sources emit an insignificant amount of mercury, thus local sources are<br />
eliminated as a cause of elevated ambient mercury concentrations. As a second potential natural<br />
reason for the observed high concentrations, we hypothesised that long range transport of GEM from<br />
the source regions on the British Isles and Europe could potentially be the cause of observed episodes<br />
of high GEM concentrations. In order to test this hypothesis, the origin of air masses during the<br />
episode from June 21 to 25 were determined by a trajectory model (from the Atmospheric chemical<br />
and deposition model, ACDEP 5 ). Four-day back trajectories were calculated with starting points at<br />
nine grid points 150 km apart of one another with the central point on Faroe islands and the others<br />
distributed around Faroe Islands, see Figure 3. The nine points were chosen in order to reduce the<br />
uncertainty of the single trajectory calculation. When all trajectories follow the same path, the central<br />
trajectory is considered representative for the atmospheric transport. Otherwise the trajectory<br />
calculation is considered highly uncertain and is omitted from the further analysis. All the trajectories<br />
arrive from the middle of the Atlantic Ocean bringing in marine background air that we expect<br />
contains about 1.5 ng/m 3 of GEM. Therefore there is a high possibility that measurement artefacts<br />
caused the increased levels observed for the period of 21-25 June. However, the transport investigated<br />
6
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
with the trajectory model was only conducted 4 days back in time. Therefore there may be transport<br />
from locations further away than the British Isles. However, deducing long range transport from<br />
trajectory models is highly uncertain.<br />
The model calculations using the DEHM, showed a near constant level of GEM throughout the<br />
period in accordance with the general belief that GEM has a long atmospheric lifetime of about 1<br />
year 19 and in agreement with the reported observations at Mace Head 7 . The results of calculations<br />
including MDE gave concentrations 0.2 to 0.4 ng/m 3 lower in April and May than calculations<br />
without MDE, see Figure 2. This indicates that MDE may be influencing the general Hg level in sub-<br />
Arctic areas, given the synoptic behaviour of the Arctic weather system.<br />
Figure 3 Four-day back tractory calculations with starting points at nine grid points 150 km apart of each<br />
other with the central point on Faroe islands and the other distributed around Faroe Islands. Starting 18:00<br />
hrs, 23 June, 2000.<br />
Mercury depletion in the Arctic has been hypothesised to be caused by Cl, ClO and/or Br, BrO<br />
chemistry within the Arctic area (e.g. 13,18 ). If those halogen species are important sinks also in the<br />
marine boundary layer, then this will shorten the lifetime of GEM, significantly creating a more<br />
variable time series of GEM in accordance with our observations. The two very different, i.e., poorly<br />
correlated, time series’ obtained by the model and by measurements therefore reinforces our belief<br />
that the Hg chemistry in the atmosphere outside the Arctic is much more complex than previously<br />
thought. However due to the lack of a protecting soda-lime trap the observations can very well be<br />
explained by passivation of the gold traps. This suggests that more measurements at the Faroe Islands<br />
are needed with a soda-lime trap before any definite conclusions can be drawn on the causes of natural<br />
variability and strength and timing of mercury episodes.<br />
7
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
7. Conclusion and future work<br />
The analysis of the concentrations of GEM obtained on the Faroe Islands shows that the average<br />
levels are slightly lower than those observed at Harwell and at Mace Head and the concentrations vary<br />
much more abruptly. In short episodes, high concentrations were observed but neither local sources<br />
nor long range transport can explain the observations. Model calculations based on DEHM gave a<br />
constant level of approximately 1.5 ng/m 3 with slightly lower levels in April and May and could not<br />
support the appearance of high observed levels. Measurement artefacts might again be part of the<br />
explanation.<br />
Furthermore, there is also doubt about the low concentrations. If the low atmospheric concentrations<br />
observed on the Faroe Islands reflect realistic levels, then they indicate that GEM has a shorter<br />
lifetime within the marine boundary layer than is generally believed. This implies that the air sea<br />
exchange of mercury outside the Arctic may be much faster than previously believed, substantially<br />
reducing the estimated lifetime of atmospheric mercury from about 1 year to a much shorter period.<br />
Based on our results, it is strongly recommended that future measurements must be performed by<br />
sampling air through a soda lime trap at all sites. The power supply has to be stable e.g. with use of an<br />
Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS). From the above discussion it is evident that more atmospheric<br />
studies on the Faroe Islands are needed in order to definitively answer the question of the atmospheric<br />
lifetime of GEM and the connection between atmospheric GEM concentrations and the high Hg levels<br />
measured in peat and in marine mammals on/near the Faroe Islands. Measurements of GEM even<br />
with sophisticated monitors such as a TEKRAN, are not trivial. Each measurement site has<br />
characteristics, which will need to be taken into consideration to ensure a campaign that produces<br />
accurate results and minimise artefacts.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
We wish to thank Bjarne Jensen and Hanne Langberg, NERI, for technical support, and the National<br />
Historic Museum of the Faroe Islands for lending us their laboratory. Per Løfstrøm is acknowledged<br />
for his advice concerning meteorology and Niels Zeuthen Heidam for administration of the Danish<br />
contribution to the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment programme. The Danish Environmental<br />
Protection Agency financially supported this work with means from the MIKA/DANCEA funds for<br />
Environmental Support to the Arctic Region. The results and conclusions presented are those of the<br />
authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of our employers or funding agencies.<br />
References<br />
1. AMAP (1998): AMAP Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme<br />
(AMAP) P.O. Box 8100 Dep. N-0032 Oslo, Norway. ISBN 82-7655-061-4.<br />
2. Grandjean, P. Weihe, P. White, R.F and Debes, F (1998) Env. Res. Sec A. 77, 165-172.<br />
3. Shotyk, W. Goodsite, M.E. Roos-Barraclough, F. Givelet, N. Leroux, G. Weiss, D. Norton, S. Knudsen, K. and Lohse,<br />
C. Atmospheric Mercury and Lead Accumulation Since 5410 14 C yr BP at Myrarnar, Faroe Islands, Under preparation<br />
(2003).<br />
4. Larsen, R.B. and Dam, M. (1999). AMAP phase I report, The Faroe Islands.<br />
8
Asian Chemistry Letters vol. XX, No 1 (2003) XX-XX<br />
5. Hertel, O. Christensen, J. Runge, E.H. Asman, W.A.H. Berkowicz, R. Hovmand, M.F. Hov, Ø. (1995). Atm. Env. 29.<br />
1267-1290.<br />
6. Steffen, S. Schroeder, B. (1999). Standard Operating Procedures Manual for Total Gaseous Mercury<br />
Measurements CANADIAN ATMOSPHERIC <strong>MERCURY</strong> MEASUREMENT NETWORK<br />
(CAMNET)VERSION 4.0. Environment Canada Atmospheric Environment Service,4905 Dufferin Street,<br />
Toronto Ontario M3H 5T4<br />
7. Ebinghaus, R. Kock, H.-H. and Hempel, M. (2000). Gefahrstoffe – Reinhaltung der luft, Vol 60, No. 5, pp 205-211.<br />
8. Kämäri, J., P. Joki—Heiskala, J. Christensen, E. Degerman, J. Derome, R. Hoff and A.-M Kähkönen: Acidifying<br />
Pollutants, Arctic Haze, and Acidifications in the Arctic, Chapter 9 in: AMAP Assesment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues.<br />
Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). S. Wilson, J. Murray and H. Huntington, Ed, 1998.<br />
9. Christensen, J. (1997). Atm. Env. Vol.31, No.24, pp.4169-4191.<br />
10. Christensen, J. (1999). An overview of Modelling the Arctic mass budget of metals and sulphur: Emphasis<br />
on source apportionment of atmospheric burden and deposition. In: Modelling and sources: A workshop on<br />
Techniques and associated uncertainties in quantifying the origin and long-range transport of contaminants to<br />
the Arctic. Report and extended abstracts of the workshop, Bergen, 14-16 June 1999. AMAP report 99:4. see<br />
also http://www.amap.no/<br />
11. Pacyna J.M., Pacyna E.G., Steenhuisen F., Wilson S., (2002). Water, Air and Soil Pollution 137, 149-165.<br />
12. Petersen, G. Munthe, J. Pleijel, K. Bloxam, R. and Vinod Kumar, A. (1998). Atm. Env. 32, 829-843.<br />
13. Lindberg, S.E. Brooks, S. C-J. Lin, C-J. Scott, K.J. Landis, M.S. Stevens R.K. Goodsite, M and Richter, A.,<br />
(2002). Environmental Science and Technology 36, 1245-1256.<br />
14.Goodsite, M.E. Brooks, S.B.Lindberg, S.E. Meyers, T.P Skov, H. and Larsen, M.R.B. Measuring reactive<br />
gaseous mercury flux by relaxed eddy accumulation using KCl coated annular denuders. Under preparation<br />
(2003).<br />
15. Lee, D.S., Dollard, G.J, Pepler, S., (1998). Atm. Env. Vol.32 No.5. pp. 855-864..<br />
16. Schroeder W. H. Anlauf K.G. Barrie L.A. Lu J.Y. Steffen A. Schneeberger D.R. Berg T. (1998). Nature 394,<br />
331-332.<br />
17. Berg, T. Batnicki, J. Munthe, J. Lattila, H. Hrehoruk, J. and Mazur, A. (2001) Atm. Env. 35, 2569-2582.<br />
18. Skov, H. Goodsite, M.E. Christensen, J. Geernaert, G. Heidam, N.Z. and Jensen, B.Atmospheric Mercury and ozone<br />
at Station Nord, Northeast Greenland. Under preparation (2003).<br />
19. Lin C-J. and Pehkonen, S.O., (1999). Atm. Env. 33 pp. 2067-2079.<br />
9
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 6: Goodsite, <strong>Michael</strong> E.; Rom, Werner; Heinemeier, Jan; Lange, Todd; Ooi, Suat; Appleby,<br />
Peter G.; Shotyk, William; van der Knaap, W. O.; Lohse, Christian; Hansen, Torben S. Highresolution<br />
AMS 14C dating of post-bomb peat archives of atmospheric pollutants.<br />
Radiocarbon (2001), 43(2B), 495-515.
HIGH-RESOLUTION AMS 14 C DAT<strong>IN</strong>G <strong>OF</strong> POST-BOMB PEAT ARCHIVES <strong>OF</strong><br />
ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS<br />
<strong>Michael</strong> E Goodsite 1,2 � Werner Rom 3 � Jan Heinemeier 3 � Todd Lange 4 � Suat Ooi 4 � Peter G<br />
Appleby 5 � William Shotyk 6 � W O van der Knaap 7 � Christian Lohse 1 � Torben S Hansen 1<br />
ABSTRACT. Peat deposits in Greenland and Denmark were investigated to show that high-resolution dating of these<br />
archives of atmospheric deposition can be provided for the last 50 years by radiocarbon dating using the atmospheric bomb<br />
pulse. 14 C was determined in macrofossils from sequential one cm slices using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Values<br />
were calibrated with a general-purpose curve derived from annually averaged atmospheric 14 CO 2 values in the northernmost<br />
northern hemisphere (NNH, 30°–90°N). We present a thorough review of 14 C bomb-pulse data from the NNH including our<br />
own measurements made in tree rings and seeds from Arizona as well as other previously published data. We show that our<br />
general-purpose calibration curve is valid for the whole NNH producing accurate dates within 1–2 years. In consequence, 14 C<br />
AMS can precisely date individual points in recent peat deposits within the range of the bomb-pulse (from the mid-1950s on).<br />
Comparing the 14 C AMS results with the customary dating method for recent peat profiles by 210 Pb, we show that the use of<br />
137 Cs to validate and correct 210 Pb dates proves to be more problematic than previously supposed.<br />
As a unique example of our technique, we show how this chronometer can be applied to identify temporal changes in Hg concentrations<br />
from Danish and Greenland peat cores.<br />
<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION<br />
Recent scientific work has demonstrated the feasibility of using peat sediments as a global atmospheric<br />
archive for heavy metal and organic contaminants. Thus, peat has been shown to be a reliable<br />
archive of atmospheric Pb (Shotyk et al. 1998), and there is evidence that Hg is also effectively<br />
immobile in peat, though the question of how faithful an archive peat is for the volatile element Hg<br />
is still under investigation (see Benoit et al. 1998). Peat has also yielded a long-term climatic record<br />
(Cortizas et al. 1999) and has provided a high-resolution record of atmospheric CO 2 content (White<br />
et al. 1994). A high-resolution time series during the last 50 years is urgently needed for pollutants<br />
such as Hg to evaluate the effects of emission controls, and to help calibrate atmospheric transport<br />
models. Such time series are especially needed from the Arctic, as the most significant gap at the<br />
present time in Arctic contaminant research is the “lack of temporal trend information for most contaminants”<br />
(Braune et al. 1999).<br />
Although there have been studies where the 14 C from the atmospheric bomb pulse has been used to<br />
date the top layers of a peat profile (see Gedyé 1998; Arslanov et al. 1999), typically in peat studies<br />
the upper layers are dated with radiometric methods, customarily 210 Pb (see Appleby et al. 1997).<br />
1Environmental Chemistry Research Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University,<br />
Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark<br />
2Present affiliation: National Environmental Research Institute of Denmark, Department of Atmospheric Environment, Frederiksborgvej<br />
399, P.O. Box 358, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark. Email: mgo@dmu.dk.<br />
3AMS 14C Dating Laboratory, Institute for Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade, DK-8000 Århus C,<br />
Denmark<br />
4NSF-Arizona AMS Facility, Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Physics Building, 1118 East Fourth St, P.O. Box<br />
210081, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0081, USA<br />
5Environmental Radioactivity Research Centre, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box<br />
147, Liverpool L69 3BX, England<br />
6Geological Institute, University of Berne, Baltzerstrasse 1, CH-3012 Berne, Switzerland<br />
7Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Berne, Altenbergrain 21, CH-3013 Berne, Switzerland<br />
© 2001 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona<br />
RADIOCARBON, Vol 43, Nr 2B, 2001, p 495–515<br />
Proceedings of the 17th International 14 C Conference, edited by I Carmi and E Boaretto 495
496 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
In the present study we investigate the feasibility of using the bomb-pulse 14 C content to date peat<br />
cores from Denmark and Greenland for the period of 1950 to the present. For comparison, the cores<br />
were also dated using the customary 210 Pb method.<br />
It is the first time that peat from Greenland is used in a high-resolution contaminant study (Goodsite<br />
2000). Peat provided the opportunity to obtain a relatively inexpensive terrestrial archive from the<br />
Arctic. The use of accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) allows dating of single year growth increments<br />
in individual plant macrofossils. We have used the dating results to compare the concentration<br />
profiles of Hg in Denmark and Greenland to the published North American Hg emission records<br />
(Pirrone et al. 1998).<br />
The details of the concentration profiles of Hg and other metal contaminants in the peat cores have<br />
been treated elsewhere (Goodsite 2000; Shotyk et al. 2001).<br />
METHODS<br />
Two distinctly geochemically and trophically different peat lands, one in Denmark and one in<br />
Greenland, were selected for study. In Denmark, we selected the raised bog at Storelung, Staaby,<br />
Funen, Denmark (55°15.5¢ N, 10°15.5¢ E). This is an ombrotrophic bog, nourished by the atmosphere<br />
since it is raised above the water table. Such bogs are well established as archives of atmospheric<br />
deposition. Three cores of predominantly Sphagnum peat were sampled in October 1999 and processed.<br />
To the best of our knowledge, no one has located an ombrotrophic peat bog in Greenland. Therefore,<br />
it was decided to find and investigate a suitable minerotrophic (groundwater nourished) fen. Small<br />
mires (a generic term for unclassified peat lands) were located and sampled in September 1999 on<br />
the Narsaq peninsula, southern Greenland (Tasiusaq, Narsaq: 61°08.3¢ N, 45°33.7¢ W) (Goodsite<br />
2000). The mires had Carex peat accumulation ranging from 20 cm to approximately 100 cm deep.<br />
Since they received at least some of their water supply and nutrients from the mineral groundwater<br />
table surrounding their landscape, they are classified as fens.<br />
One-meter long cores (monoliths) of peat spanning approximately three thousand years of deposition<br />
were taken from each location. As the peat deposits were similarly sampled, and the cores were<br />
processed in the same way, only the Greenland cores will be described in some detail. Three (15 cm<br />
× 15 cm by approximately 100 cm) replicate monoliths of peat from each of two sites in Greenland<br />
(only one site in Denmark) were cored using a Ti Wardenaar peat sampler (Wardenaar 1987). At<br />
each site the three replicate cores were taken at a distance of approximately 1.5 m from each other.<br />
Further analysis was carried out on cores from only one site, with cores from the other site being frozen<br />
and stored. The choice of Greenland site to be analyzed immediately was based on pH profiles<br />
of the peat pore water measured in the field. The site chosen had a higher acidity in the upper 20 cm<br />
than the other site, which was near neutral pH throughout. Since pH is a typical indicator of trophic<br />
status, with ombrotrophic bogs typically having pH of 3 to 4, it was hoped that this upper region<br />
might prove to be ombrotrophic, though later analyses showed it was not.<br />
The three cores (labelled A, B, C) from each site were frozen soon thereafter and shipped to the<br />
Trace Metals Lab, Geological Institute, University of Berne for further processing and analysis. The<br />
zero point on the depth scale is defined by visual inspection as the point where it appears that the living<br />
(green material) stops. Hg and metals analyses are as described in Shotyk et al. (2001).<br />
Core A was sliced into 3 cm slices by hand using a stainless steel knife prior to freezing. Pore water<br />
was manually squeezed out of the slices, filtered and then stored cool. Portions of the slices were
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 497<br />
dried overnight at 105 °C in a drying oven and milled in a Ti mill. The milled powder from pieces<br />
of each centimeter slice was then manually homogenized prior to using the powder for further analysis.<br />
Lead and 19 other elements were then determined using X-ray fluorescence spectrometry<br />
(XRFS) at EMMA Analytical, Canada, by Dr Andriy Cheburkin (see Shotyk et al. 2001).<br />
Core B was cut while frozen into 1 cm slices using a stainless steel band saw, and selected portions<br />
of the slices were then dried and milled as above. Samples were then analyzed as before using<br />
XRFS. Powders were selected for stable lead isotope analysis using thermal ionization mass spectrometry,<br />
based on the Pb concentration profile obtained using XRFS. Plant macrofossils were<br />
removed from the centers of the slices from Cores B at the Institute of Plant Science, University of<br />
Berne, where they were cleaned and dried at 60 °C. Within one week from selection they were processed<br />
at the AMS 14 C Dating Laboratory, University of Aarhus, for 14 C dating with AMS using a<br />
standard procedure for plant material (washed, acid-base-acid treatment). AMS was run on the samples<br />
to reproduce the atmospheric bomb pulse curve and to date peaks in the profile. We would like<br />
to stress that we use well-defined and carefully selected macrofossils for our study, so all the wellknown<br />
effects of getting too old or highly varying ages from dating peat water, bulk material or<br />
humic acid, humin and fulvic acid fractions (see Olsson 1986; Shore et al. 1995) do not apply.<br />
For the construction of a terrestrial bomb-pulse calibration curve, we used two different materials<br />
from southern Arizona (USA), Douglas fir and cottonseeds, measured at the NSF-Arizona AMS<br />
Facility. A cross-section of Douglas fir was cut, smoothed with sandpaper and individual rings were<br />
then sampled. The cottonseeds were harvested in the year they were produced and archived for later<br />
use. Both sample types received the following acid-base-acid pretreatment: They were soaked in 3N<br />
HCl overnight to remove inorganic carbon, afterwards they were rinsed to neutral pH with ASTM<br />
Type I water, soaked in 2% NaOH overnight to remove mobile carbon (i.e. humic or fulvic acids),<br />
rinsed to neutral pH with Type I water, soaked in 3N HCl to neutralize any remaining NaOH, and<br />
finally rinsed to neutral pH with Type I water.<br />
Conversion of all the 14 C ages to calendar ages was performed via a Bayesian calibration program<br />
(Puchegger et al. 2000) using cubic spline interpolation for the calibration curve. Our calibration<br />
curve (see solid line in Figure 1) was constructed as follows: For the period before 1956 we used the<br />
tree-ring data from the <strong>IN</strong>TCAL98 14 C calibration curve (Stuiver et al. 1998). For the period from<br />
1956 till now we used annually averaged atmospheric 14 CO 2 data for the latitude band 30°–90° N<br />
provided by I Levin (personal communication): for the period of 1955 to 1959 data compiled by<br />
Tans (1981), from 1959 to 1984 data from Vermunt from Levin et al. (1985); after 1988 the arithmetic<br />
mean values from the three northern hemispheric stations Izaña (1985–1997), Jungfraujoch<br />
(1987–1997) and Alert (1989–1997) were taken. Values for 1998 and 1999 were obtained by extrapolating<br />
the almost exactly exponential global decrease in 14 CO 2 since 1982 (Levin and Hesshaimer<br />
2000).<br />
Core B was also dated with 210 Pb and 137 Cs at the Liverpool University Environmental Radiometric<br />
Laboratory. Dried and ground samples from the profile were analyzed for 210 Pb, 226 Ra, 137 Cs, and<br />
241 Am by direct gamma assay using Ortec HPGe GWL series well-type coaxial low background<br />
intrinsic germanium detectors (Appleby et al. 1986). Corrections were made for the effect of selfabsorption<br />
of low-energy gamma ray within the sample (Appleby et al. 1992). 210 Pb dates were calculated<br />
using the CRS (constant rate of supply) dating model (Appleby and Oldfield 1978) and corrected<br />
to agree with the 137 Cs signal using the methodology described in Appleby (1998).<br />
Core C remains frozen as an archive at the Trace Metals Lab, Geological Institute, University of<br />
Berne.
498 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
Figure 1 The bomb-pulse curve. a) The annually averaged atmospheric 14 CO 2 curve for the 30°–90°N latitude band provided<br />
by I Levin (personal communication). b) Atmospheric 14 CO 2 data from Vermunt, Austria (47°N) and Schauinsland,<br />
Germany (48°N) (Levin et al. 1997) but only averaged for April to August, the growing season of oaks (Rom 2000). c) See<br />
Table 1. d) Trees from the Mackenzie Delta, Canada, and Mingyin, Yunnan Province, China (Dai and Fan 1986). e) Mainly<br />
ears (but also grains or green parts) of barley, wheat, rye and oats from the Copenhagen area (Tauber 1967). Note that the<br />
(annually averaged) values given are only approximate values since the original data had been published as D using a physical<br />
14 C half-life of 5570 yr and 1958 as the reference year. Regarding the rather high value for 1959 Tauber (1967) mentions<br />
that in that year the polar front had an extreme northern position at European latitudes during the whole summer. f)<br />
Tree from Obrigheim, Germany (Levin et al. 1985). g) Tree from Dailing, Heilongjiang Province, China (Dai et al. 1992).<br />
h) Different sections and different chemical fractions in tree-rings from an oak from Uppsala, Sweden (Olsson and Possnert<br />
1992).<br />
Inset: Global input by the atmospheric nuclear weapons’ tests measured as TNT energy equivalent (thin black line) and<br />
cumulative input using an exponential decay time of 18.70 ± 0.15 yr corresponding to the uptake by the biosphere and the<br />
oceans (see Levin and Hesshaimer 2000). Values are given in arbitrary units.<br />
The “History” of the Bomb-Pulse (see Bennett et al. 2000; USNT 2000), a report on the US bomb tests published by the<br />
US Department of Energy, in a few cases states slightly different dates). 1) May 1952: The first major thermonuclear device<br />
is successfully tested by the USA (Eniwetok Atoll). Aug 1953: The first major thermonuclear device is successfully tested<br />
by the USSR (Semipalatinsk). 2) Feb. 1954: The USA test their first thermonuclear device at the Bikini Atoll, the highestyield<br />
test site of the USA (yield maximum in 1954/6/8). Further relevant test sites with high yields for the USA: 1952 Eniwetok<br />
Atoll, 1958/62 Johnston Island, 1962 Christmas Islands. 3) Sept. 1957: The USSR test their first thermonuclear<br />
device at the Novaya Zemlya, the highest-yield test site of the USSR (yield maxima in 1958 and 1961/2). 4) Oct/Nov 1958:<br />
Due to the “Geneva convention of Experts for the Discontinuance of Nuclear Weapons” the USA and the USSR stop their<br />
atmospheric tests. There is a general moratorium till France starts its atmospheric tests in Algeria in Feb 1960. 5) 1961–<br />
62: The USSR and the USA resume testing in September 1961 and April 1962, respectively. 6) Nov/Dec 1962 Due to the<br />
“Partial Test Ban Treaty” the USA and the USSR stop their atmospheric tests forever. Only underground tests are allowed,<br />
and only if no radioactive debris is spread beyond territorial limits. 7) Oct 1964: China starts its atmospheric testing series<br />
at Lob Nor (yield maxima in 1967–70 and 1973/6). 8) Jul 1966: France starts its atmospheric testing series at Muroroa and<br />
Fangataufa (yield maxima in 1968 and 1970–72, stopped in Sep 1974). 9) Oct 1980: China performs the last atmospheric<br />
test ever. 10) April 1986: The nuclear power plant at Chernobyl, USSR explodes. 11) Sept 1996: The Comprehensive Test<br />
Ban Treaty is opened for signature, but so far (Nov 2000) has not been ratified by the USA or India.<br />
The decline of the bomb 14 C after stopping the atmospheric nuclear weapons tests is mainly driven by uptake into the<br />
oceans and the biosphere. In addition, emissions of fossil fuel CO 2 , emissions of 14 C by nuclear power plants, and possibly<br />
nuclear underground tests contribute (Levin and Hesshaimer 2000).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The Bomb-Pulse Curve for the Northern Hemisphere<br />
General Considerations<br />
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 499<br />
Figure 1 shows several 14 C records covering the bomb-pulse period, which were obtained from<br />
either atmospheric 14 CO 2 measurements or from tree-rings and seeds in the northernmost part of the<br />
northern hemisphere (NNH), i.e. the region north of about 30°N excluding the tropical (Hadley)<br />
convection cell. Now a crucial question arises in connection with any 14 C calibration curve: is it only<br />
of local validity or does it apply to the entire NNH. In the following we address this question and<br />
demonstrate that it is possible to construct a calibration curve, which is valid for the whole NNH<br />
producing accurate dates within 1–2 years.<br />
Nydal and Lövseth (1983) investigated atmospheric 14 CO 2 concentration patterns for the period<br />
1962–1980 showing that these patterns are basically the same for the southern tip of Norway (58°N)<br />
and Spitsbergen (78°N), and also 14 CO 2 concentrations on the Canary Islands (27–28°N) show similar<br />
results. Similarly, for the period 1980–1992 Nydal and Gislefoss (1996) find no significant deviation<br />
between the Nordkapp (71°N) and the Canary Islands. From these data there is no evidence for<br />
a significant latitude dependence of atmospheric 14 CO 2 concentrations for regions ranging from subtropical<br />
to subpolar/polar. However, a decrease of several percent in atmospheric 14 CO 2 concentrations<br />
(around the bomb-pulse maximum) when going to northern hemisphere tropical regions (9–<br />
15°N) is clearly documented in Nydal and Lövseth (1983). The same effect is also reflected in trees<br />
from the tropics (see Murphy et al. 1997).<br />
Dai and Fan (1986) and Dai et al. (1992) compared 14 C concentrations in tree-rings from spruce<br />
trees grown at different longitudes and latitudes in the northern hemisphere. They see good agreement<br />
for tree-rings grown at the same latitude, which reflects the rapid zonal mixing of the troposphere<br />
within about 1 month (e.g. Ehhalt 1999). On the other hand, these authors claim a clearly visible<br />
latitude dependence of 14 C in trees grown in 1961–1967 at 27°N, 47°N, and 68°N (see Figure<br />
1). This may be explained by the fact that meridional atmospheric mixing takes several months<br />
(Ehhalt 1999), and injection of air from the stratosphere, enriched in 14 CO 2 compared to the troposphere,<br />
is not equally distributed in time and latitude but mainly takes place during spring/early summer<br />
at mid-latitudes (Levin et al. 1985; Dai and Fan 1986). Subsequently, the injected 14 CO 2 “diffuses”<br />
north and south. Since trees also mainly grow in the spring/summer season, this together with<br />
the sufficiently slow meridional mixing (compared to zonal mixing) may lead to a significantly<br />
higher 14 C concentration taken up into tree-rings relative to the annual atmospheric average, and also<br />
may generate a latitudinal gradient in atmospheric 14 CO 2 concentrations. However, Olsson and Possnert<br />
(1992) regard some of the values measured by Dai and Fan (1986) in a white spruce from Canada<br />
(68°N) (see Figure 1) as unexpectedly high compared to atmospheric measurements from Spitsbergen<br />
(78°N) and Abisko, Sweden (68°N), and they point out that finer details of the sample<br />
pretreatment are missing (see also discussion below). They therefore advise to treat these results<br />
with caution.<br />
For the rising part of the bomb pulse Tauber (1967) compared numerous 14 C data in both atmospheric<br />
CO 2 and plants at mid-latitude regions all over the world and found no clear latitude dependence.<br />
He supposed that the amplitude and extent of a possible latitude effect may depend on annually<br />
varying meteorological factors (see also caption of Figure 1). Grass samples taken within one<br />
week in June 1963, the year with the highest input of bomb-produced 14 C, also did not reveal any<br />
significant latitudinal gradient all over Scandinavia (56–70°N). However, for the same month he
500 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
observed a clear difference in grass samples from Greenland relative to Scandinavia of more than<br />
14% in 14 C level, corresponding to a delay of somewhat more than one month. Furthermore, a clear<br />
gradient with high values in the south was observed for Greenland. This general difference between<br />
Scandinavia and Greenland has been explained by the location of the polar front: In summer times<br />
the polar front is over southern Scandinavia with frequent shift toward north and south, but over the<br />
Atlantic it is generally far south of Greenland. Therefore stratospheric 14 CO 2 injected at mid-latitudes<br />
and diffusing toward north and south is distributed differently.<br />
Note that the production of 14 C by the atmospheric nuclear weapons tests was maximum in 1962<br />
(see Bennett et al. 2000), whereas the maximum 14 C concentration in tropospheric measurements<br />
show up in August/September 1963 and in June 1964 for the extratropical and the tropical NH,<br />
respectively (see Nydal and Lövseth 1983, and Nydal and Lövseth 1996 with slightly corrected and<br />
also updated data; see also inset in Figure 1). This clearly shows a) the (seasonally dependent) injection<br />
of 14 CO 2 from the stratosphere, and b) a delay due to the different transport patterns between<br />
tropics (Hadley cells) and extratropics (Ferrel and polar cells).<br />
Several decades after the bomb-pulse maximum Olsson (1989) finds a still slightly lower 14 C level<br />
in plants from subarctic and arctic areas (including Iceland, the Faroe Islands, Greenland or Spitsbergen)<br />
compared to Sweden (e.g. about 2% in Spitsbergen for 1980). Also atmospheric 14 CO 2 measurements<br />
in Abisko, Sweden (68°N) and Kapp Linné, Spitsbergen (78°N) during the 1980s show<br />
consistently lower values for Spitsbergen, however in the range of less than 1.5% (Olsson 1993).<br />
Another factor influencing the 14 C level is the dilution with fossil fuel derived CO 2: For the abovementioned<br />
oak tree from Sweden studied in Olsson and Possnert (1992) (see Figure 1) a local industrial<br />
effect in the range of 2% was claimed. Also for the pine tree from Germany studied in I. Levin<br />
et al. (1985) (see Figure 1) a 14 C depression of 1.5% by fossil fuel contamination has been ascribed,<br />
although in this case not as a local but as a general ground level effect. Olsson (1989) states, that<br />
clean air does not exist any longer, and therefore e.g. “clean air” 14 C values from Germany, which<br />
were generally lower than in Sweden (about 2–3% for the late 1970s/early 1980s), should reflect a<br />
higher fossil fuel contamination. However, this difference is gone during the 1980s.<br />
For the present-day northern hemisphere the maximum of fossil fuel CO 2 emissions at mid-latitudes<br />
leads to a corresponding minimum in atmospheric 14 C activity. E.g. measurements at the Alpine station<br />
Jungfraujoch, Switzerland (47°N) from 1993–4 show 14 C values, which are about 1‰ and<br />
1.5‰ lower than values obtained at the remote stations Alert, Nunavut, Canada (82°N) and Izaña,<br />
Canary Islands (28°N) (Levin and Hesshaimer 2000). Values in the tropics (Llano del Hato, Venezuela,<br />
8°N) are even higher (2‰), which may be due to reemission of bomb-pulse 14 C from the<br />
highly active biosphere, which has a carbon turnover time of about 30 years (Levin and Hesshaimer<br />
2000).<br />
To study the influence of the sample selection and pretreatment regarding tree-rings Olsson and Possnert<br />
(1992) investigated different sections (early wood vs. late wood) and different chemical fractions<br />
in tree-rings from an oak tree from Uppsala, Sweden (60°N). After removal of the soluble fraction,<br />
which corresponds roughly to applying the commonly used acid-base-acid method, they find<br />
no clear evidence for a delay between the atmospheric and tree-ring 14 C values on a timescale of<br />
weeks. For the years 1962–63, i.e. the steepest rise in the bomb pulse, the difference between earlywood<br />
and late-wood values is evident (see Figure 1). Olsson and Possnert (1992) do not ascribe this<br />
to the temporally dependent diffusion of injected stratospheric 14 CO 2 but to nutrients from the<br />
respective preceding year, which are stored in the roots and are used for the formation of the early<br />
wood of the following year.
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 501<br />
Figure 1 summarizes a large part of the data discussed above. When comparing the curve of 14 C concentrations<br />
in plants and atmospheric 14 CO 2 averaged over the growing season of oaks (dashed line)<br />
with the curve of the respective annually averaged atmospheric concentrations (solid line), the two<br />
curves coincide except for a few years around the bomb-pulse maximum. This difference can be<br />
ascribed to the great seasonal oscillations caused by stratospheric injection of excess (bomb) 14 C<br />
leading to regional differences within the extratropical northern hemisphere (NNH). However, these<br />
differences are insignificant after about 1971 (Nydal and Lövseth 1983) (after about 1978 according<br />
to Olsson 1993), where basically equilibrium between the stratosphere and the troposphere has been<br />
reached. (The deviation of the spruce tree from China from atmospheric concentrations between<br />
1976 and 1982 shown in Figure 1 clearly reflects the Chinese atmospheric atomic bomb tests during<br />
that time (Dai et al. 1992).)<br />
Finally we want to emphasize that—even including all the effects discussed above (except for the<br />
period 1976–82 in China as discussed above)—any of the bomb-pulse records shown in Figure 1<br />
when used for calibration from the mid 1950s on will generally give the same calibrated age within<br />
1–2 years.<br />
A Complete Tree-Ring/Seed Bomb-Pulse Record and an Atmospheric Bomb-Pulse Calibration Curve<br />
for the Extratropical Northern Hemisphere<br />
None of the so far published bomb-pulse records from tree-rings shown in Figure 1 covers the whole<br />
second half of the 20th century. We present a first (although not annual) record from plant material<br />
covering the whole bomb-peak period till now. The 14 C data were obtained from Douglas fir treerings<br />
and cottonseeds from southern Arizona (32°N), which are summarized in Table 1 and shown<br />
in Figure 1. As can be seen from Figure 1, the values closely follow the annually averaged atmospheric<br />
14 CO 2 concentration curve for the NNH (solid line) provided by I Levin (personal communication).<br />
It is interesting to note that the data from Arizona do not show significantly higher 14 C<br />
concentration values for the period around the bomb-pulse maximum (see also the previous section),<br />
i.e. they do not follow the seasonal variations as expected for plants compared to annually averaged<br />
atmospheric values. For comparison, we constructed a calibration curve using atmospheric 14 CO 2<br />
data from Vermunt, Austria and Schauinsland, Germany (Levin et al. 1997) but only averaged for<br />
April to August, the growing season of oak trees (see Wrobel and Eckstein 1992), to simulate the<br />
relevant annual portion of 14 CO 2 that is taken up by the plant. Such an “atmospheric” calibration<br />
curve (Rom 2000, see dashed line in Figure 1) clearly shows the features expected from the stratospheric<br />
injection of excess 14 C in spring, which is surprisingly well matched by the cereals data from<br />
Denmark (Tauber 1967; see Figure 1). From this, the Arizona data, when compared to the annually<br />
averaged atmospheric 14 CO 2 data, may either point towards a latitudinal dependence (see preceding<br />
section) or rather seem to be unaffected by the seasonal variations due to the injection of stratospheric<br />
14 CO 2. We checked the gap between 1992 and 1998 in our tree-ring/seed record and measured<br />
green leaves of an (unspecified) tree collected at the Brorfelde Observatory, Zealand, Denmark<br />
(56°N) resulting in (110.5 ± 0.5) pMC (AAR-3339). Similar to the extrapolation of the<br />
atmospheric calibration curve by I. Levin (as described in the Methods section) we interpolated the<br />
1996 value for our Arizona data using an exponential fit to the data points from 1983–1998. The corresponding<br />
error was obtained by averaging the variances for the given period. The interpolated<br />
value of (110.8 ± 0.6) pMC perfectly matches the measured value.<br />
We finally decided to use the annually averaged atmospheric 14 CO 2 curve for the 30–90°N latitude<br />
band provided by I Levin (personal communication) (solid line in Figure 1) as our general purpose<br />
bomb-pulse calibration curve since a) the Arizona data closely follow this curve but do not provide
502 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
Table 1 14C determination in plants from Arizona, USA to establish a terrestrial bomb-pulse calibration curvea Lab nr Sample speciesb Specification Sample yr Sample location d 13C (‰) pMCc AA6665 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1955 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 100.2 ± 0.6<br />
AA6667 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1957 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 108.4 ± 0.6<br />
AA6668 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1959 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 125.5 ± 0.7<br />
AA6670 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1961 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 122.9 ± 0.7<br />
AA6671 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1962 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 134.4 ± 1.2<br />
AA6672 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1963 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 161.8 ± 0.9<br />
AA6673 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1964 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 182.3 ± 1.1<br />
AA6674 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1965 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 175.6 ± 0.9<br />
AA6675 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1966 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 169.4 ± 1.0<br />
AA6676 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1967 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 165.7 ± 0.9<br />
AA6678 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1969 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 156.8 ± 0.9<br />
AA6680 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1971 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 153.8 ± 0.9<br />
AA11846 Cotton Seed 1972 Southern Arizona, USA - 27.0 145.8 ± 0.6<br />
AA11847 Cotton Seed 1973 Southern Arizona, USA - 26.4 143.9 ± 0.4<br />
AA6682 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1973 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 145.0 ± 0.8<br />
1973 (weighted average) 144.1 ± 0.4<br />
AA11848 Cotton Seed 1974 Southern Arizona, USA - 26.0 140.9 ± 0.4<br />
AA11849 Cotton Seed 1974 Southern Arizona, USA - 29.3 139.5 ± 0.6<br />
1974 (weighted average) 140.5 ± 0.3<br />
AA11850 Cotton Seed 1975 Southern Arizona, USA - 27.1 137.6 ± 0.7<br />
AA11851 Cotton Seed 1975 Southern Arizona, USA - 27.8 137.8 ± 0.5<br />
AA6684 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1975 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 138.7 ± 0.8<br />
1975 (weighted average) 137.9 ± 0.4<br />
AA6686 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1977 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 134.7 ± 0.7<br />
AA6688 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1979 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 129.9 ± 0.7<br />
AA11839 Cotton Seed 1980 Southern Arizona, USA - 28.2 127.7 ± 0.7<br />
AA11840 Cotton Seed 1981 Southern Arizona, USA - 28.7 126.1 ± 0.4<br />
AA11841 Cotton Seed 1981 Southern Arizona, USA - 27.3 126.3 ± 0.6<br />
AA6690 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1981 Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona, USA - 25.0d 127.1 ± 0.7
Table 1 14 C determination in plants from Arizona, USA to establish a terrestrial bomb-pulse calibration curve a (Continued)<br />
Specification Sample yr Sample location d 13 C (‰) pMC c<br />
Lab nr Sample species b<br />
1981 (weighted average) 126.3 ± 0.3<br />
AA6692 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1983 Santa Catalina Mountains, - 25.0<br />
Arizona, USA<br />
d 124.5 ± 0.7<br />
AA11843 Cotton Seed 1984 Southern Arizona, USA - 26.9 122.6 ± 0.4<br />
AA11844 Cotton Seed 1985 Southern Arizona, USA - 26.1 120.2 ± 0.4<br />
AA6694 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1985 Santa Catalina Mountains, - 25.0<br />
Arizona, USA<br />
d 123.8 ± 0.8<br />
1985 (weighted average) 120.9 ± 0.4<br />
AA6696 Douglas Fir Tree ring 1987 Santa Catalina Mountains, - 25.0<br />
Arizona, USA<br />
d 119.6 ± 0.8<br />
AA11845 Cotton Seed 1992 Southern Arizona, USA - 27.2 114.0 ± 0.6<br />
— e<br />
Tree ring 1998 Arizona, USA 110.0 ± 0.7<br />
aWhenever there is more than one sample in an individual year, first a weighted average for samples from the same sample material (Douglas fir or<br />
cottonseeds) was made. These sample-material averages were then combined in a weighted average to give the final result for the respective year.<br />
Since most calibration programs use conventional 14C ages as input, for the convenience of reader we give the formula to convert pMC values into<br />
14C age T:<br />
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 503<br />
T – 8033 Ln pMC<br />
=<br />
× æ ------------ ö<br />
è 100 ø<br />
All the bomb-pulse data will then result in negative ages. We know that there is some reluctance in the 14C community to use negative 14C ages, but<br />
we think they might be a suited extension of the pre-bomb calibration curve into the bomb and post-bomb period without changing units. Note that<br />
the conventional positive 14C ages are also not “true” ages but only a quite arbitrary though unambiguous mathematical transformation of the 14C activity of the sample, which is still kept for historical reasons. Furthermore using 1950 as a reference year is not based on physical/natural parameters<br />
but also just a convention. By using negative 14C ages one would avoid to publish 14C datings before 1950 in yrs BP, whereas they have to be given<br />
as pMC or 14C afterwards.<br />
bDouglas Fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii); Cotton (Gossypium species)<br />
cpMC (percent Modern Carbon ) = ( 14C concentration of the sample)/(0.95 × Oxalic Acid I 14C concentration) × 100. Both 14C concentrations are d 13C corrected and refer to the same year.<br />
dA d 13C of - 25.0 was assumed for all Douglas Fir samples<br />
e Private communication by D Donahue
504 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
annual resolution, b) the curve provides consistent, carefully checked data covering the whole bomb<br />
pulse till now, c) most of the data used for constructing this curve are widely used among the 14 C<br />
community (see Levin et al. 1997 for the 14 CO 2 data from Vermunt, Austria), and d) differences to<br />
the other extratropical northern hemisphere curves shown in Figure 1 generally result only in calibrated<br />
age differences of 1–2 years as stated in the previous section.<br />
For calibration no uncertainties were assumed for our NNH curve. If not otherwise stated, all the calibrated<br />
14 C ages in the Tables and Figures of this paper are given as 95%-confidence intervals (often<br />
denoted as “2-s intervals”).<br />
The Peat Cores from Greenland and Denmark<br />
Figures 2 and 3 and Table 2 show our results on plant material from the two peat cores Storelungmose<br />
in Denmark and Tasiusaq in Greenland. Both 14 C and modelled 210 Pb results are given.<br />
14 C Dating<br />
Regarding the 14 C measurements in the Greenland core (see Figure 2 and Table 2), one can see two<br />
important features: first, dating of samples from the peat surface gives results that are consistent<br />
with the year of the sampling, and second, the sample with the maximum 14 C content (AAR-5626)<br />
of 179.1 ± 0.8 pMC shows rather good agreement with the maximum of the calibration curve of<br />
184.0 pMC. The peak value in our data from the Greenland core corresponds also well to the D 14 C<br />
value of (776 ± 8)‰, i.e. (178.2 ± 0.8) pMC, measured in a grass sample from Narsaq, the very same<br />
peninsula where our peat samples come from, in July 1963 (Tauber 1967). Since no significant natural<br />
enrichment process for 14 C is known, this agreement between the peak value in our Greenland<br />
core and the atmospheric record cannot be just coincidence but ensures that we have no significant<br />
dampening for the Greenland peat core.<br />
This is in contrast to results of Jungner et al. (1995) who measured 14 C in peat hummocks, i.e. raised<br />
surfaces on the peat land as opposed to “hollows”, from central and eastern Finland (61°N and 62°N,<br />
respectively) using AMS on well defined stems of Sphagnum fuscum moss. For the peat core from<br />
central Finland the maximum 14 C value in the cellulose fraction of a moss sample representing a single-year<br />
fraction shows a D 14 C of (660 ± 13)‰, i.e. (166.4 ± 1.3) pMC, a moss sample from the eastern<br />
Finland peat core representing a 3–5 yr average yielded a value as low as (564 ± 11)‰, i.e.<br />
(156.8 ± 1.1) pMC. Jungner et al. (1995) inferred that this effect was due to CO 2 emitted from<br />
decaying layers below the surface (i.e. older layers). An alternative explanation might be that the<br />
samples showing maximum 14 C content do not represent the bomb-pulse maximum.<br />
Regarding the 14 C measurements in the Denmark core (see Figure 2 and Table 2), one also can see<br />
two important features: First, dating of samples from the peat surface gives results that are consistent<br />
with the year of the sampling, which is similar to the Greenland core, and second, the sample with<br />
the maximum 14 C content (AAR-5614) of 152.7 ± 0.8 pMC clearly does not agree with the maximum<br />
of the calibration curve of 184.0 pMC. More samples between 2.5 and 8.5 cm depth have to be<br />
dated in the near future to find out whether we so far just missed the peak of the bomb-pulse or<br />
whether there is significant dampening in the Denmark core, which we cannot exclude so far.<br />
Preliminary results of additional determinations are now available for Denmark and Greenland. A<br />
macrofossil from 9.5 cm from the Danish core (AAR-6860) has a pMC of 176.8 ± 0.7, which<br />
approaches the expected maximum and additional samples above and below the maximum support<br />
a well developed curve. Therefore we originally just missed the peak of the bomb-pulse and no significant<br />
dampening is seen in the Danish core.
Table 2a Sample specifications, 13C values and 14C AMS datings of carefully selected and processed macrofossils from the peat cores from<br />
the Storelungmose, Denmark, and Tasiusaq, Greenland—Macrofossils from the Storelung Mose, Ståby, Fyn, Denmark (55°15.384¢ N,<br />
10°15.336¢ E)<br />
Calibrated age ranges (yr AD)<br />
(95% confidence intervals)<br />
pMC b<br />
d 13C (‰) a<br />
Depth<br />
(cm)<br />
Lab nr<br />
(AAR–) Sample species Specification<br />
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 505<br />
5611 Andromeda sp. Fresh leaves 0c - 27.5 111.36 ± 0.54 1957<br />
1995–1999<br />
5612 Leucobryum sp. Branches and leaves 000.5 - 26.1 111.31 ± 0.61 1957<br />
1995–1999<br />
5613 Leucobryum sp. Branches and leaves 002.5 - 26.8 115.84 ± 0.65 1958<br />
1989–1992<br />
5614 Leucobryum sp. Branches and leaves 008.5 - 24.3 152.68 ± 0.76 1963<br />
1970–1971<br />
6612 Sphagnum sp. Leaves 010.5 - 23.0 136.99 ± 0.74 1962<br />
1975–1976<br />
6613 Sphagnum sp. Leaves 011.5 - 24.0 123.68 ± 0.65 1959–1961<br />
1982–1984<br />
6614 Sphagnum sp. Leaves 012.5 - 23.6 127.09 ± 0.67 1962<br />
1980–1981<br />
6615 Sphagnum sp. Leaves and stems 013.5 - 24.3 109.74 ± 0.65 1957<br />
1995–1999<br />
5615 Leucobryum sp. Branches and leaves 014.5 - 24.7 120.19 ± 0.55 1958; 1960<br />
1984–1987<br />
5616 Leucobryum sp. Branches and leaves 015.5 - 25.7 120.58 ± 0.56 1958–1961<br />
1984–1987<br />
5617 Cyperaceae Leaves 016.5 - 27.0 100.12 ± 0.53 1693–1726; 1813–1850<br />
1862–1918; 1951–1956<br />
5618 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 018.5 - 24.2 99.43 ± 0.49 1687–1729; 1810–1923<br />
1950–1955<br />
5619 Sphagnum sp. Branches (?) and leaves 078.5 - 24.5 68.39 ± 0.38 1425–1424 BC; 1412–1211 BC<br />
1201–1192 BC; 1179–1163 BC<br />
1141–1132 BC<br />
ad 13C values have been measured by Árny E Sveimsbjörnsdóttir, Science Institute, the University of Iceland<br />
bSee Table 1 for definition<br />
cThese samples were taken from slightly above ground and correspond to the Hg concentrations values at negative depths shown in Figure 4
506 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
Table 2b Sample specifications, 13C values and 14C AMS datings of carefully selected and processed macrofossils from the peat cores from<br />
the Storelungmose, Denmark, and Tasiusaq, Greenland—Macrofossils from Tasiusaq, Narssaq, Greenland (61°08.314¢ N, 45°33.703¢ E).<br />
Calibrated age ranges (yr AD)<br />
(95% confidence intervals)<br />
pMC b<br />
d 13 C<br />
(‰) a<br />
Depth<br />
(cm)<br />
Lab nr<br />
(AAR–) Sample species Specification<br />
5620 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 00c - 26.2 110.99 ± 0.57 1957<br />
1996–1999<br />
5621 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 0 - 28.3 111.88 ± 0.62 1957<br />
1994–1999<br />
5622 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 00.5 - 26.8 114.34 ± 0.57 1957–1958<br />
1991–1994<br />
5623 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 05.5 - 26.3 140.33 ± 0.61 1962<br />
1973–1974<br />
5624 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 77.5 - 25.8 143.13 ± 0.69 1962<br />
1973<br />
5625 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 09.5 - 25.9 162.32 ± 0.72 1963<br />
1967<br />
5626 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 012.5 - 27.6 179.13 ± 0.83 1963–1965<br />
5627 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 014.5 - 26.7 126.62 ± 0.59 1961–1962<br />
1980–1981<br />
5628 Sphagnum sp. Branches and leaves 016.5 - 27.2 121.07 ± 0.54 1958–1961<br />
5629 Dwarf bush Twigs 018.5 - 27.1 102.52 ± 0.54 1956<br />
5630 Vascular plant — 087.5 - 26.7 069.52 ± 0.44 1292–1280 BC<br />
1263–973 BC<br />
959-941 BC<br />
ad 13C values have been measured by Árny E Sveimsbjörnsdóttir, Science Institute, the University of Iceland<br />
bSee Table 1 for definition<br />
cThese samples were taken from slightly above ground and correspond to the Hg concentrations values at negative depths shown in Figure 4
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 507<br />
Figure 2 14 C AMS dating results for the Storelungmose (Denmark) and the Tasiusaq (Greenland) peat cores.<br />
The solid line represents the annually averaged atmospheric 14 CO 2 curve for the northernmost northern hemisphere<br />
provided by I Levin, Heidelberg. This curve was used for calibrating all our data from the peat cores.<br />
Symbols denote the maximum-probability age for the respective sample. Dotted symbols mark the two possible<br />
solutions for a sample (AAR-5614, see Table 2a) for which it was impossible to decide on one of these<br />
solutions from stratigraphic evidence. Horizontal bars denote 95%-confidence intervals, coherent portions in<br />
agreement with stratigraphic order are shown in black, portions contradicting stratigraphic order that therefore<br />
were rejected are shown in gray. The enclosed circles at 176.8 ± 0.7 pMC show in fact that no dampening<br />
occurred in the Danish bog.<br />
In the following we just speculate about the possible consequences of the dampening seen in the<br />
Danish core prior to additional dating. Since we measure living moss samples from the surface to be<br />
in agreement with atmosphere values this case would then be similar to Jungner et al. (1995), and<br />
similarly we may conclude that the mean 14 C activity of the CO 2 emitted from decaying sub-surface<br />
peat layers is not significantly below 100 pMC. Diluting the atmospheric values with about 35% of<br />
emitted CO 2 at 100 pMC (which gives the maximum measured in the Denmark core) may produce<br />
a significant shift of up to four years towards older ages regarding the maximum-probability age for<br />
the samples AAR-5615, 5616 and 6613 (see Table 2), which are centered around the wiggle in atmospheric<br />
14 CO 2 activity at the end of the 1950s/beginning of 1960s. However, these shifted ages lie<br />
only one year outside the confidence intervals (marked in black in Figures 2 and 3) of the respective<br />
samples. The calibrated ages of all the other samples on the rising part of the bomb pulse would be<br />
much less affected by such a dampening effect.<br />
Emanation of CO 2 from decomposition of layers close to the surface might lead to an apparent time<br />
lag for the bomb-pulse peak value in the peat, but in any conceivable scenario pre-peak layers will<br />
be dated too old, when calibrated with our general-purpose calibration curve, not too young. For<br />
comparison with 210 Pb results see later.
508 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
Going from 11.5 cm to 15.5 cm there is a significant dip in the 14 C content of the respective moss<br />
plants (see sample AAR-6615 at 13.5 cm, Table 2a). The order of this excursion (more than 10 percent<br />
relative to natural level) corresponds to measurements in cereals from Denmark for the period<br />
1959–62 (Tauber 1967; see Figure 1), which also show a pronounced wiggle (about 130 pMC in<br />
1959, 123 and 121 pMC in 1960 and 1961, respectively, and 137 pMC in 1962). However, the absolute<br />
values in our peat core are about 10 percent lower. Such a depletion cannot be explained by a<br />
simple model of admixture of 35% peat-derived CO 2 with an activity of 100 pMC as discussed<br />
above, but a more elaborate model would be required to cover all the features of a possibly “dampened”<br />
curve for a core.<br />
The 14 C data from both the Denmark and the Greenland peat core suggest a significantly different<br />
accumulation rate between the topmost layers and lower layers (see Figure 3) A linear regression for<br />
all 14 C data in the Greenland and the Denmark core (omitting only the unresolved two-fold solution<br />
for AAR-5614, see Table 2) gives an average accumulation rate of 4.3 and 3.7 mm yr - 1 , respectively,<br />
whereas for the lower layers as shown in Figure 3 one gets 6.9 and 8.2 mm yr - 1 , respectively. So the<br />
peat layers close to the top seem to comprise more years per cm than the lower layers. This is just<br />
opposite to what one expects if gravitational compression takes place. One might assume that<br />
increased decomposition in the peat layers close to the surface compared to the lower layers is<br />
responsible for this effect. However, dry bulk density (DBD) vs. depth profiles, which show a high<br />
degree of similarity in both cores and which are also highly correlated with Hg concentration profiles<br />
down to about 18 cm (see Goodsite 2000), do not consistently support this assumption. To clarify<br />
this question it will be necessary to measure more samples from different depths close to the surface.<br />
Since we have taken 1 cm slices from the individual peat cores, it is evident from the accumulationrate<br />
data given above that on average a single slice contains more than two years. So to get annual<br />
resolution for the Hg profiles it therefore might be preferable to measure both 14 C and Hg in the<br />
annual growth increment of the very same moss plant.<br />
14 C dating of macrofossils in a peat core makes it possible to selectively date objects from any depth<br />
of the profile in the bomb-pulse period (and possibly also before; see below). (This, of course, is the<br />
case only if significant dampening can be excluded, which clearly is the case for both of our cores.)<br />
14 C therefore is able to pick up details of the peat evolution, e.g. changes of the accumulation rate,<br />
which may serve as an important input for the 210 Pb modelling. Moreover, the immediate need for a<br />
continuous chronology, i.e. the need to date an entire column with other radiometric means such as<br />
210 Pb, to get a date for a certain peat layer is eliminated. However, for flux calculations of e.g. Hg in<br />
the associated layers a continuous chronology is still required. Flux calculations derived from 14 C<br />
measurements should be more precise though account may need to be taken of possible migration of<br />
the pollutant relative to the peat matrix. (Regarding a possible different basic trend between 14 C and<br />
210 Pb—especially in the data for the Denmark core—see the discussion of the 210 Pb data below.)<br />
For a given 14 C concentration in a sample there is always an (at least) twofold solution in the bombpulse<br />
period regarding calibrated-age ranges. Therefore it is necessary to measure at least two points<br />
of a profile from the bomb-peak period, which are close to each other in depth, in order to determine<br />
which side of the bomb-pulse one’s points are on. Then—by assuming an undisturbed stratigraphic<br />
order of the peat layers—it is generally possible to discard one of the solutions for each sample.<br />
Although 14 C dating is commonly regarded as impossible after 1650 (and before the bomb-peak<br />
era), we think this is not completely true. Especially the period from 1900 to 1950 shows an almost<br />
perfect monotonic decrease in 14 C. Single-year data from tree-rings from Douglas firs (grown on the
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 509<br />
Olympic Peninsula, 47°N) show a decrease from about - 2‰ to - 25‰ (Stuiver and Quay 1981) corresponding<br />
to a change of about 120 14 C years within 50 cal yr. If therefore another method (such as<br />
210 Pb dating) may provide evidence that a peat sample stems from the first half of the 20th century,<br />
high-resolution dating with 14 C can be performed for this period.<br />
210 Pb Dating<br />
Figure 3 Age-depth profiles for the Storelungmose (Denmark) and the Tasiusaq (Greenland) peat<br />
cores. Both 14 C AMS dating results and data from 210 Pb modelling (corrected according to 137 Cs)<br />
are shown. 14 C results correspond to those shown in Figure 2 (for symbols and bars see caption of<br />
Figure 2). A linear regression has been applied to the ages of highest probability at 10.5–18.5 cm<br />
depth in the Denmark core and at 5.5–18.5 cm depth in the Greenland core, showing a high linear<br />
correlation between age and depth (especially for the Greenland core with a correlation of more<br />
than 99%), although one has to be aware that in general peat accumulation rates may deviate a lot<br />
from linearity. Data at the top clearly deviate from this regression lines indicating a slower accumulation<br />
(see text). 210 Pb values and the respective uncertainties (1-s ) are shown as crosses and<br />
thin lines. Note the significant deviations in the Denmark core between the 14 C data and the<br />
respective 210 Pb data. Better agreement is found for the Greenland core, though in both cases there<br />
are significant discrepancies in the pre-1963 sections.<br />
210 Pb is a naturally occurring fallout radionuclide that is deposited on the bog surface from the atmosphere<br />
and incorporated in the bog archive, along with records of atmospherically delivered pollutants<br />
such as stable Pb and Hg. Concentrations of 210 Pb at different depths in the bog depend on the<br />
atmospheric flux at the time the layer was at the bog surface, the net peat accumulation rate (original<br />
growth rate minus subsequent losses by organic decay), and the age of the layer. Although globally<br />
the atmospheric 210 Pb flux may vary spatially by up to an order of magnitude (Appleby and Oldfield<br />
1992), its value at a given location is generally considered to be fairly constant, at least on an annually<br />
averaged basis. This assumption is supported by measurements comparing the contemporary<br />
flux via rainfall with the long-term flux via soil cores (unpublished data). Because of the effects of<br />
varying net peat accumulation rates, the unsupported (atmospherically deposited) 210 Pb activity does<br />
not usually follow a simple exponential reduction with depth, even when plotted against cumulative
510 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
dry mass. The most widely used method for calculating dates in cores with non-exponential records<br />
is the CRS (constant rate of 210 Pb supply) model (Appleby and Oldfield 1978). This involves measuring<br />
210 Pb at regular intervals down to the depth at which 210 Pb reaches equilibrium with the supporting<br />
226 Ra (ca. 130 years). The results are presented as a continuous set of dates spanning this<br />
period. Because of small-scale irregularities over the surface of the bog, the efficiency with which<br />
fallout 210 Pb is trapped at a given site in the bog may vary through time, causing errors in the CRS<br />
model dates. In such cases, independently dated horizons, usually based on records of the artificial<br />
fallout radionuclides 137 Cs and 241 Am from the atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons (peaking in<br />
1963) or the Chernobyl accident (1986), are used to make corrections to the 210 Pb dates (Appleby<br />
1998).<br />
The Danish (Storelungmose) and Greenland (Tasiusaq) peat cores had relatively similar 210 Pb<br />
records. In both cores, 210 Pb/ 226 Ra equilibrium was reached at depths of between 24–26 cm. The<br />
unsupported 210 Pb activity-versus-depth profiles were approximately exponential though with a<br />
shallower gradient in the upper part of the core. The profiles from both cores had small non-monotonic<br />
features in the top 15 cm. 210 Pb dates calculated using the CRS model indicated episodes of<br />
rapid peat growth during the past 40 years, though the general trend was one of declining net accumulation<br />
rates in the older sections reflecting losses from the peat matrix.<br />
Results for the Denmark and Greenland peat cores revealed significant differences between the<br />
210 Pb dates and the 1963 depths indicated by the 137 Cs record. In both cores the uncorrected 210 Pb<br />
dates placed 1963 at a depth of 12.5 cm. The 137 Cs stratigraphy suggested that it was significantly<br />
deeper in the core, at 14–16 cm in Storelungmose and 15.5 cm in Tasiusaq. (The latter also has a second<br />
more recent peak at 3.5 cm that may record fallout from the 1986 Chernobyl accident.) Figure<br />
3 shows the corrected 210 Pb dates for each core using the 1963 137 Cs date as a reference point<br />
(Appleby 1998). Uncertainties are given as 1-s intervals, corresponding to 68%-confidence intervals.<br />
Note that shifting the reference point influences basically all the modelled 210 Pb dates. E.g. placing<br />
the 1963 peak to 12.5 cm instead of 15 cm means that all the dates above this level are also shifted<br />
in age although the shift gradually decreases when approaching the surface, which is used as another<br />
reference point. Dates below the 1963 level are all shifted by a constant value (6 yr in the case of the<br />
Denmark core).<br />
The 14 C measurements now offer a means for testing the validity of the 210 Pb dating procedure, and<br />
in particular the use of 137 Cs as an independent time marker to correct the 210 Pb results. Since 137 Cs<br />
fallout from atmospheric weapons tests peaked in 1963, the same year as the NNH atmospheric 14 C<br />
concentration reached its maximum value, it might be expected that bog records of these two radionuclides<br />
should have peaks at similar depths. This, however, is not the case. The 14 C peaks occur at<br />
9.5 cm in Storelungmose, and at 12.5 cm in Tasiusaq. The uncorrected 210 Pb dates are thus in better<br />
agreement with the 14 C dates than those corrected by 137 Cs.<br />
Although pore-water diffusion of 137 Cs in peat and sediment cores is well documented, this is normally<br />
assumed to mainly affect the tail of the 137 Cs profile. Until now there has been very little direct<br />
evidence for a significant displacement of the peak. Two possible causes of this are an initial advective<br />
displacement through partially saturated surface vegetation at the time of deposition on the bog<br />
surface, or downward diffusion and preferential adsorption onto a layer containing higher concentrations<br />
of clay minerals. The apparently larger displacement in the Storelungmose core may be due<br />
to its lower mineral content, evidenced by very low 226 Ra concentrations (
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 511<br />
226 Ra concentrations in the Tasiusaq core (mean value 21 Bq kg - 1 ) suggest a significant minerogenic<br />
input, possibly as wind-blown dust.<br />
A further contributory factor that cannot be discounted is distortion of the 137 Cs record by changing<br />
peat accumulation rates. Since this also affects 210 Pb, the local maximum value of the 137 Cs/ 210 Pb<br />
activity ratio may be a better indicator of the depth of the 1963 fallout maximum than the 137 Cs peak<br />
itself. In both cores the 137 Cs/ 210 Pb ratio has a maximum value at 12.5 cm. Regardless, the results<br />
presented here show that the use of 137 Cs records to validate and correct 210 Pb dates is more problematic<br />
than previously supposed. Since 210 Pb records, and also those of other trace metal pollutants,<br />
might be similarly affected, the interpretation of pollutant records in peat bogs, and in particular<br />
their relationship to the peat matrix, is an issue that needs to be addressed in greater detail. Bomb<br />
14 C, which offers an accurate means for dating the matrix itself, will be an invaluable tool for inves-<br />
tigating this relationship.<br />
One problem that needs further investigation is the decrepancy between 14 C and 210 Pb in pre-1963<br />
sections of the core (see Figure 3) where 14 C dates get progressively younger than 210 Pb dates (corrected<br />
or uncorrected). This cannot be explained either by downward migration of 210 Pb (since this<br />
would produce younger 210 Pb dates) or by emanation of CO 2 from decay of sub-surface layers (see<br />
Jungner et al. 1995). As mentioned above, this would lead to a shift towards higher ages.<br />
Mercury<br />
Figure 4 shows an application of the 14 C bomb-pulse dating method to Hg concentration profiles<br />
measured in the peat cores from Denmark and Greenland. The chronology of concentration changes<br />
at the two sites is similar. The similarity of the two curves from two geochemically different mires<br />
and different climate regimes is consistent with current views, which suggest global transport of Hg.<br />
Our profiles also show a fair correlation with Hg emissions in the northern hemisphere (Pirrone et<br />
al. 1998), and this similarity also suggests that peat may be a suitable archive for recording atmospheric<br />
Hg, though no conclusions can be drawn about how faithfully the archive preserves Hg concentrations.<br />
E.g. the peaks observed in the mid 1960s and the late 1950s for the Greenland core<br />
appear to correspond with maxima observed in the ice record (Boutron et al. 1998), though concentrations<br />
in the peat are approximately 10,000 times higher. Declines in North American emissions<br />
after 1989 have been reported (Pirrone et al. 1998) and declines seen in Hg archives representing the<br />
last decade may be related to the closing of major former East German chlor alkali plants and coalfired<br />
power plants (Gerhard Petersen, pers. comm.) At this time we cannot exclude that the declines<br />
seen in our peat profiles may be artifacts due to some combination of physical, chemical, and biological<br />
processes, but the possibility remains that the declining Hg concentrations since the late<br />
1940s and more sharply during the last decade, reflect a real decline in atmospheric Hg concentrations.<br />
The same Hg concentration shape, with the same fall in Hg concentration in the approximate<br />
top ten cm has been seen in many other studies including a recent study at the far south latitude location<br />
of Patagonia (Biester et al. 2000).<br />
We do not present Hg flux calculations in this paper since more 14 C dates are required for samples<br />
from a) depths between the surface layers and lower layers to obtain the proper change of the accumulation<br />
rate in this region, and b) depths around the 1963 bomb-pulse peak to find out whether<br />
dampening takes place in the Denmark core.
512 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
Figure 4 Hg concentration profiles for the Storelungmose (Denmark) and the Tasiusaq (Greenland) peat<br />
cores. Hg concentrations are normalized to dry bulk density. Horizontal dashed lines indicate the depth where<br />
the macrofossils used for 14 C dating were taken. The corresponding calibrated ages are given as numbers<br />
close to the lines. Where two Hg concentration measurements were performed unweighted mean values and<br />
error bars corresponding to the uncertainty of the mean are shown.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
By comparing data sets from all over the extratropical northern hemisphere, the present paper shows<br />
that 14 C dating of plants during the bomb-pulse period is generally possible at a precision of 1–2<br />
years. For the first time, we were able to clearly reproduce the whole atmospheric 14 C bomb-pulse<br />
curve in peat cores by measuring 14 C in macrofossils in peat from Greenland and Denmark, and we<br />
could exclude any significant dampening effect for these cores. We compared the 14 C bomb-pulse<br />
dating method, which allows precise dating of single points in the peat matrix, with the more familiar<br />
techniques based on records of fallout radionuclides. 14 C is actively taken up into the living material<br />
from the surrounding atmosphere and gets fixed via photosynthetic activity along with the stable<br />
isotopes 12 C and 13 C, which provide normalization of the 14 C concentrations, allowing direct dating<br />
of the material. In contrast, records of fallout 210 Pb, together with those of Pb and Hg, may be subject<br />
to small displacements at the time of deposition on the bog surface. Comparisons between 14 C<br />
and 210 Pb offer a means for determining a more precise interpretation of pollution records in bog<br />
archives.<br />
As an example of the usefulness of the 14 C bomb-pulse dating method combined with peat core analysis,<br />
we applied the 14 C bomb-pulse dating method to two peat cores from Greenland and Denmark<br />
to obtain high-resolution dates for Hg concentration profiles for the second half of the 20th century.
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 513<br />
The 14 C bomb-pulse method is currently being evaluated in peat from the Faroe Islands and another<br />
site (Store Vildmose) in Denmark. Aside from the above sites, it will be used to obtain a high-resolution<br />
profile of contaminants through time in peat from locations such as Bathurst Island (Canada),<br />
and Carey Æ erne (the Carey Islands, Greenland) in the high Arctic.<br />
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
The financial support from the following sources is acknowledged and greatly appreciated: The<br />
Danish Cooperation for Environment in the Arctic (DANCEA) and the Danish Ministry of the Environment,<br />
the Danish Natural Science Research Council (SNF), the Swiss National Science Foundation<br />
(Grant Number 21-55669.98 to W Shotyk), Hans von Storch of the GKSS Institute for Hydrophysics,<br />
and Robert Frei of the Danish Isotope Center. We especially want to thank Andriy<br />
Cheburkin of EMMA analytical, Harald Biester, University of Heidelberg, Fiona Roos, University<br />
of Berne for their expertise in Hg measurements, and Henrik Loft Nielsen for exellent discussions<br />
throughout the project as well as improvements to the manuscript. Thanks to Douglas Donahue,<br />
Mariza Costa-Cabral, Ole John Nielsen, Henrik Skov, Steve Lindberg, and Gary Geernaert for discussion<br />
and encouragement; Rikke Brandt, Tommy Nørnberg and Otto Frederiksen for excellent<br />
field assistance. Special thanks to the people of Tasiusaq, Narsaq, Greenland, the Greenland Homerule,<br />
and the Danish Polar Center for their support. The ideas and opinions expressed in this article<br />
are the authors’ alone. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions or ideas of the funding agencies,<br />
sponsors, or employers.<br />
We are indebted to Ingeborg Levin, University of Heidelberg, for providing both 14 CO 2 measurement<br />
and model data. Data (a part of which has not been published so far) may be directly requested<br />
from I Levin (email: Ingeborg.Levin@iup.uni-heidelberg.de).<br />
REFERENCES<br />
Appleby, PG. 1998. Dating recent sediments by 210 Pb:<br />
Problems and solutions. Proc. 2nd NKS/EKO-1 Seminar,<br />
Helsinki, 2-4 April 1997, STUK, Helsinki. p 7–24<br />
Appleby PG, Oldfield F. 1978. The calculation of 210 Pb<br />
dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported<br />
210 Pb to the sediment. Catena 5:1–8.<br />
Appleby PG, Oldfield F. 1992. Application of 210 Pb to<br />
sedimentation studies. In: Ivanovich M, Harmon RS,<br />
editors. Uranium-series disequilibrium: applications<br />
to earth, marine & environmental sciences. Oxford:<br />
Oxford University Press. p 731–78.<br />
Appleby PG, Nolan PJ, Gifford DW, Godfrey MJ, Oldfield<br />
F, Anderson NJ, Battarbee RW. 1986. 210 Pb dating<br />
by low background gamma counting. Hydrobiologia<br />
141:21–27.<br />
Appleby PG, Richardson N, Nolan PJ. 1992. Self-absorption<br />
corrections for well-type germaniun detectors.<br />
Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research<br />
B 71:228–33.<br />
Appleby PG, Shotyk W, Fankhauser A. 1997. 210 Pb age<br />
dating of three peat cores in the Jura Mountains, Switzerland.<br />
Water Air and Soil Pollution 100 (3/4):223–<br />
31.<br />
Arslanov KA, Saveljeva LA, Gey NA, Klimanov VA,<br />
Chernov SB, Chernova GM, Kuzmin GF, Tertychnaya<br />
TV, Subetto DA, Denisenkov VP. 1999. Chronology of<br />
vegetation and paleoclimatic stages of northwestern<br />
Russia during the late glacial and holocene. Radiocarbon<br />
41(1):24–5.<br />
Bennett BB, De Geer LE, Doury A. 2000. Nuclear weapons<br />
test programmes of the different countries. In:<br />
Warner F, Kirchmann RJC, editors. Nuclear test explosions—environmental<br />
and human impacts. Chichester,<br />
New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto:<br />
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p 13–32.<br />
Benoit JM, Fitzgerald WF, Damman AWH. 1998. The<br />
biogeochemistry of an ombrotrophic bog: evaluation<br />
of use as an archive of atmospheric mercury deposition.<br />
Environmental Research, Section A 78:118–33.<br />
Biester H, Kilian R, Hertel C, Schöler HF. 2000. Elevated<br />
mercury concentrations in southern Patagonian peat<br />
bogs—An anthropogenic signal? Oral presentation at<br />
the Silver Anniversary International Conference on<br />
Heavy Metals in the Environment in Ann Arbor, USA,<br />
6–10 August 2000.<br />
Boutron CF, Vandal GM, Fitzgerald WF, Ferrari CP.<br />
1998. A 40-year record of mercury in central Greenland<br />
snow. Geophysical Research Letters 25(17):<br />
3315–8.<br />
Braune B, Muir D, Demarch B, Gamberg M, Poole K,<br />
Currie R, Dodd M, Duschenko W, Eamer J, Elkin B,<br />
<strong>Evan</strong>s M, Grundy S, Hebert C, Johnstone R, Kidd K,
514 M E Goodsite et al.<br />
Koenig B, Lockhart L, Marshall H, Reimer K, Sanderson<br />
J, Shutt L. 1999. Spatial and temporal trends of<br />
contaminants in Canadian Arctic freshwater and terrestrial<br />
ecosystems: a review. Science of the Total Environment<br />
230:145–207.<br />
Cortizas AM, Ponteedra Pomba X, Garcia-Rodeja E, Novoa<br />
Munoz JC, Shotyk W. 1999. Mercury in a Spanish<br />
peat bog: archive of climate change and atmospheric<br />
metal deposition. Science 284:939–42.<br />
Dai KM, Fan CY. 1986. Bomb produced 14C content in<br />
tree rings grown at different latitudes. Radiocarbon<br />
28(2A):346-9.<br />
Dai KM, Qian Y, Fan CY. 1992. Bomb-produced 14C in<br />
tree rings. Radiocarbon 34(3):753–6.<br />
Ehhalt DH. 1999. Gas Phase Chemistry of the Troposphere.<br />
In: Baumgärtel H, Grünbein W, Hensel F, editors.<br />
Global aspects of atmospheric chemistry. Darmstadt:<br />
Steinkopff Verlag and New York: Springer<br />
Verlag. p 21–109.<br />
Gedyé SJ. 1998. Mass balance in recent peats. Unpublished<br />
PhD thesis, Liverpool University.<br />
Goodsite MG. 2000. Determination of heavy-metal deposition<br />
by correlation with 14-C. Thesis. The University<br />
of Southern Denmark, Odense University, Department<br />
of Chemistry, March 2000.<br />
Jungner H, Sonninen E, Possnert G, Tolonen K. 1995.<br />
Use of bomb-produced 14C to evaluate the amount of<br />
CO2 emanating from two peat bogs in Finland. Radiocarbon<br />
37(2):567–73.<br />
Levin I, Kromer B, Schoch-Fischer H, Bruns M, Münnich<br />
M, Berdau D, Vogel JC, Münnich KO. 1997.<br />
14CO2 records from two sites in Central—Schauinsland<br />
& Vermunt. URL: .<br />
Levin I, Hesshaimer V. 2000. Radiocarbon—a unique<br />
tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon<br />
42(1):69-80.<br />
Levin I, Kromer B, Schoch-Fischer H, Bruns M, Münnich<br />
M, Berdau D, Vogel JC, Münnich KO. 1985. 25<br />
years of tropospheric 14C observations in Central Europe.<br />
Radiocarbon 27(1):1–19.<br />
Murphy JO, Lawson EW, Fink D, Hotchkis MAC, Hua Q,<br />
Jacobsen GE, Smith AM, Tuniz C. 1997. 14C measurements<br />
of the bomb pulse in N- and S-hemisphere tropical<br />
trees. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics<br />
Research B123:447–50.<br />
Nydal R, Lövseth K. 1983. Tracing bomb 14C in the atmosphere<br />
1962-1980. Journal of Geophysical Research<br />
88 (C6):3621–42.<br />
Nydal R, Lövseth K. 1996. Carbon-14 measurements in<br />
atmospheric CO2 from northern and southern hemisphere<br />
sites, 1962–1993. URL: .<br />
Nydal R, Gislefoss JS. 1996. Further application of bomb<br />
14C as a tracer in the atmosphere and ocean. Radiocarbon<br />
38(3):389–406.<br />
Olsson IU. 1986. A study of errors in 14C dates of Peat<br />
and Sediment. Radiocarbon 28(2A):429–35.<br />
Olsson IU. 1989. Recent 14 C activity in the atmosphere,<br />
“clean air” and the Chernobyl effect. Radiocarbon<br />
31(3):740–6.<br />
Olsson IU, Possnert G. 1992. 14 C activity in different sections<br />
and chemical fractions of oak tree rings, AD<br />
1938–1981. Radiocarbon 34(3):757–67.<br />
Olsson IU. 1993. A ten-year record of the different levels<br />
of the 14 C activities over Sweden and the Arctic. Tellus<br />
45B:479–81.<br />
Pirrone N, Allegrini I, Keeler GJ, Nriagu J, Rossman R,<br />
Robbins JA. 1998. Historical atmospheric mercury<br />
emissions and depositions in North America compared<br />
to mercury accumulations in sedimentary<br />
records. Atmospheric Environment 32(5):929–40.<br />
Puchegger S, Rom W, Steier P. 2000. Automated Evaluation<br />
of 14 C Measurements. Nuclear Instruments and<br />
Methods in Physics Research B 172:274–80.<br />
Rom W. 2000. 14 C Accelerator Mass Spectrometry - Applications<br />
in Archaeology, Biomedicine and in the Atmospheric<br />
Sciences. Thesis, University of Vienna,<br />
Austria.<br />
Shore JS, Bartley DD, Harkness DD. 1995. Problems encountered<br />
with the 14 C dating of peat. Quaternary Science<br />
Reviews (Quaternary Geochronology) 14:373–<br />
83.<br />
Shotyk W, Weiss D, Appleby PG, Cheburkin AK, Frei R,<br />
Gloor M, Kramers JD, Reese S, van der Knaap WO.<br />
1998. History of atmospheric lead deposition since<br />
12,370 14 C yr BP recorded in a peat bog profile, Jura<br />
Mountains, Switzerland. Science 281:1635–40.<br />
Shotyk W, Goodsite ME, Lohse C, Hansen TS, Roos F,<br />
Biester H, Cheburkin AK, Heinemeier H, Appleby<br />
PG, Reese S. 2001. Continuous, 3000-year peat core<br />
records of Atmospheric Hg in Greenland and Denmark.<br />
Earth and Plantetary Science Letters. Submitted.<br />
Stuiver M, Quay PD. 1981. Atmospheric 14 C changes resulting<br />
from fossil fuel CO 2 release and cosmic ray<br />
flux. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 53:349–62.<br />
Stuiver M, Reimer PJ, Bard E, Beck JW, Burr GS,<br />
Hughen KA, Kromer B, McCormac G, van der Plicht<br />
J, Spurk M. 1998. <strong>IN</strong>TCAL98 radiocarbon age calibration,<br />
24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041-<br />
83. Data are available at URL: .<br />
Tans PP. 1981. A compilation of bomb 14 C data for use in<br />
global carbon model calculations. In: Bolin B, editor.<br />
SCOPE 16, Carbon cycle modelling. Chichester New<br />
York Brisbane Toronto; Wiley. p 131–57.<br />
Tauber H. 1967. Copenhagen radiocarbon measurements<br />
VIII—geographic variations in atmospheric C 14 activity.<br />
Radiocarbon 9:246–56.<br />
USNT. 2000. United States Nuclear Tests—July 1945<br />
through September 1992. Report. DOE/NV—209-<br />
REV 15. United States Department of Energy, Nevada<br />
Operations Office. Las Vegas, Nevada. URL: http://
www.nv.doe.gov/news&pubs/publications/historyreports/pdfs/DOENV209_REV15.pdf.<br />
Wardenaar ECP. 1987. A new hand tool for cutting peat.<br />
Canadian Journal of Botany 65:1772–3.<br />
White JWC, Ciaia P, Figge RA, Kenny R, Markgraf V.<br />
1994. A high resolution record of atmospheric CO 2<br />
14 C Dating of Post Bomb Peat Archives 515<br />
content from carbon isotopes in peat. Nature 367:153–<br />
6.<br />
Wrobel S, Eckstein D. 1992. Determining Time and Environment<br />
from Tree Rings. In: Hackens T, Jungner H,<br />
Carpelan C, editors. PACT 36. Rixensart: PACT Belgium.<br />
p 33–49.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 7: Roos-Barraclough F; Givelet N; Martinez-Cortizas A; Goodsite M E; Biester H; Shotyk<br />
W An analytical protocol for the determination of total mercury concentrations in solid<br />
peat samples. Science of the Total Environment (2002 Jun 20), 292(1-2), 129-39.
The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
An analytical protocol for the determination of total mercury<br />
concentrations in solid peat samples<br />
a, a b c,1 d<br />
F.Roos-Barraclough *, N.Givelet , A.Martinez-Cortizas , M.E.Goodsite , H.Biester ,<br />
W.Shotyka,d Abstract<br />
aGeological<br />
Institute, University of Berne, Baltzerstrasse 1, 3012 Berne, Switzerland<br />
Department of Soil Science, University of Santiago di Compostela, Santiago di Compostela, Spain<br />
cDepartment<br />
of Chemistry, Odense University, Odense, Denmark<br />
dInstitute<br />
of Environmental Geochemistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany<br />
b<br />
Received 10 November 2000; accepted 20 December 2001<br />
Traditional peat sample preparation methods such as drying at high temperatures and milling may be unsuitable<br />
for Hg concentration determination in peats due to the possible presence of volatile Hg species, which could be lost<br />
during drying.Here, the effects of sample preparation and natural variation on measured Hg concentrations are<br />
investigated.Slight increases in mercury concentrations were observed in samples dried at room temperature and at<br />
y1 y1<br />
30 8C (6.7 and 2.48 ng kg h , respectively), and slight decreases were observed in samples dried at 60, 90 and<br />
y1 y1<br />
105 8C (2.36, 3.12 and 8.52 ng kg h , respectively).Fertilising the peat slightly increased Hg loss (3.08 ng<br />
y1 y1 y1 y1<br />
kg h in NPK-fertilised peat compared to 0.28 ng kg h in unfertilised peat, when averaged over all<br />
temperatures used).Homogenising samples by grinding in a machine also caused a loss of Hg.A comparison of two<br />
Hg profiles from an Arctic peat core, measured in frozen samples and in air-dried samples, revealed that no Hg losses<br />
occurred upon air-drying.A comparison of Hg concentrations in several plant species that make up peat, showed that<br />
some species (Pinus mugo, Sphagnum recurvum and Pseudevernia furfuracea) are particularly efficient Hg retainers.<br />
The disproportionally high Hg concentrations in these species can cause considerable variation in Hg concentrations<br />
within a peat slice.The variation of water content (1.6% throughout 17-cm core, 0.97% in a 10=10 cm slice), bulk<br />
density (40% throughout 17-cm core, 15.6% in a 10=10 cm slice) and Hg concentration (20% in a 10=10 cm<br />
slice) in ombrotrophic peat were quantified in order to determine their relative importance as sources of analytical<br />
error.Experiments were carried out to determine a suitable peat analysis program using the Leco AMA 254, capable<br />
of determining mercury concentrations in solid samples.Finally, an analytical protocol for the determination of Hg<br />
concentrations in solid peat samples is proposed.This method allows correction for variation in factors such as<br />
vegetation type, bulk density, water content and Hg concentration in individual peat slices.Several subsamples from<br />
*Corresponding author.Tel.: q41-31-6318761; fax: q41-31-631-4843.<br />
E-mail address: fiona.roos@geo.unibe.ch (F.Roos-Barraclough).<br />
1<br />
Present address: Department of Atmospheric Environment, National Environmental Research, Denmark.<br />
0048-9697/02/$ - see front matter � 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.<br />
PII: S0048-9697Ž 02. 00035-9
130 F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
each peat slice are air dried, combined and measured for Hg using the AMA254, using a program of 30 s (drying),<br />
125 s (decomposition) and 45 s (waiting).Bulk density and water content measurements are performed on every<br />
slice using separate subsamples. � 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.<br />
Keywords: Mercury; Peat bog archives; Atmospheric pollution<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Records of net accumulation of atmospheric Hg<br />
are well-preserved in peat cores from ombrotrophic<br />
bogs (Madsen, 1981; Jensen and Jensen, 1991;<br />
Benoit et al., 1998; Burgess et al., 1998; Martinez-<br />
Cortizas et al., 1999; Shotyk et al., 2001).By<br />
measuring the concentrations of Hg in peat extending<br />
back in time to pre-anthropogenic periods,<br />
natural ‘background values’ and their climate-<br />
(Martinez-Cortizas et al., 1999) and volcanismrelated<br />
variations can be quantified and used to<br />
identify the effects of recent increases due to<br />
human activities.During traditional acid digestion<br />
of peat samples, various sources of contamination<br />
must be considered and clean techniques such as<br />
those employed by Weiss et al. (1999a) used.<br />
Analysis of solid samples by combustion and<br />
subsequent trapping of Hg on gold before analysis<br />
by AAS (Salvato and Pirola, 1996) using the Leco<br />
AMA 254 (Martinez-Cortizas et al., 1999) not<br />
only avoids several possible sources of contamination<br />
(acids, digestion vessels) but is also safer<br />
and less expensive (no acids required) and allows<br />
a high sample throughput.The ash from the<br />
combusted samples can be recovered and used for<br />
further analysis, for example determination of<br />
refractory trace metals such as Ti and Zr by X-ray<br />
fluorescence spectrometry (XRF).However, the<br />
volatility of Hg (0) combined with the natural<br />
variability of peat structural components (water<br />
content, bulk density, ash content) mean that care<br />
must also be taken to achieve accurate results<br />
when analysing solid samples.<br />
2. Methods<br />
All tests were carried out in the trace metals<br />
laboratory of the Geological Institute of the Uni-<br />
versity of Berne.Mercury concentrations were<br />
determined by AAS using the Leco AMA 254.<br />
The bog at Etang de la Gruere (EGR) in the<br />
Swiss Jura mountains is ombrotrophic, with 6.5 m<br />
14<br />
of peat dating from 12 370 C yr BP (Shotyk et<br />
al., 1998).Peat from the ombrotrophic, pre-anthropogenic<br />
part of the EGR2A core was homogenised<br />
and used to determine losses upon drying at<br />
different times and temperatures, in both unfertilised<br />
and artificially fertilised peat.Twenty-three<br />
different plant species were collected over a period<br />
of 4 years from the surface of the bog at Etang de<br />
la Gruere ` and their mercury concentrations were<br />
determined using the Leco AMA 254.The range<br />
in water content in air-dried peat subsamples<br />
(cylindrical ‘plugs’, 16-mm diameter) was also<br />
determined using samples from this core.<br />
The Hg concentration profile was measured<br />
twice in a peat core from the High Arctic of<br />
Canada, using (1) frozen samples and (2) samples<br />
which had been air-dried in a clean-air cabinet<br />
overnight at room temperature (RT) to determine<br />
whether Hg losses occurred upon drying.<br />
A peat monolith from Schoepfenwaldmoor<br />
(SWM), Switzerland (Weiss et al., 1999b), was<br />
used to investigate the variation of water content,<br />
bulk density and Hg concentration in a typical<br />
ombrotrophic peat.Water content and bulk density<br />
were studied both in a short core (17 cm) and<br />
within an individual peat slice (10=10=1 cm).<br />
Variation of Hg concentrations within a single<br />
slice was also recorded.The investigation of the<br />
effect of air drying at room temperature was also<br />
carried out using samples from this core.<br />
The effect of grinding dry samples and of<br />
alterations to the Leco AMA 254 analysis program<br />
were studied using an in-house peat standard (OGS<br />
1878P), which had previously been dried at 105<br />
8C and homogenised.
F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
2.1. Determination of a suitable peat analysis<br />
program for Hg analysis using the Leco AMA 254<br />
The Leco AMA 254 is fully compliant with<br />
EPA (1998) method 7473.Samples contained in<br />
nickel sample holders enter a sealed drying and<br />
combustion furnace, where they are dried in a<br />
stream of oxygen before being thermally decomposed.Gases<br />
from the thermally decomposed sample<br />
are swept in the stream of oxygen through a<br />
catalyst furnace at 750 8C, which fully decomposes<br />
the gases and traps NO 2, SO2 and halogens.Mercury<br />
is trapped on a gold amalgamator situated at<br />
the end of the furnace.Waste gases are removed<br />
from the system by the gas stream.The amalgamator<br />
is then heated to 500 8C to release the<br />
mercury, which is measured by atomic absorption<br />
spectrometry.The detection limit of the instrument<br />
is 0.01 ng Hg and the working range is 0.05–600<br />
ng Hg, with repeatability being -1.5%.<br />
The instrument was calibrated using liquid standards<br />
prepared from Merck mercury standard solu-<br />
y1<br />
tion, 1000 mg l .Solutions of concentration 10<br />
y1<br />
and 1000 ng ml were used to dose the instru-<br />
ment.A 10-point calibration was made from 0.00<br />
to 29 ng Hg.The equation used to calculate the<br />
calibration curve is:<br />
1<br />
kŽ NST. s µ AjiŽ NST. ymji∂<br />
8ji n<br />
Where k is the constant of proportionality, NST is<br />
the relative non-absorbable radiation flux, A is the<br />
corrected absorbance and m is the quantity of<br />
mercury in the cell.For the calibration obtained,<br />
slope (k)s42.64"0.62 ng.<br />
To test the effect of increased drying time (and<br />
therefore increased Hg passing through the apparatus<br />
from oxygen supply), blanks were run on<br />
the Leco AMA 254 using drying times of 9 and<br />
500 s (other parameters being kept constant:<br />
decomposition time 150 s, waiting time 45 s).<br />
The validity of the recommended drying time<br />
was also tested w0.7=vol.water (ml)x s.Ten<br />
samples of the in-house peat standard OGS 1878<br />
P were moistened (made up to 95% water,<br />
RH OG18<br />
V) and analysed using the recommend-<br />
2<br />
ed drying time.Ten dry samples were also analysed<br />
using a drying time of 20 s.<br />
131<br />
A suitable decomposition time was established<br />
by measuring Hg in nine samples of OGS 1878 P<br />
at 100, 125, 150 and 175 s decomposition time<br />
(drying and waiting time being constant at 30 and<br />
45 s, respectively).One coal and five plant-derived<br />
certified standard reference materials (SRMs) were<br />
analysed using this program.<br />
2.2. Effects of sample preparation: drying times<br />
and temperatures<br />
Homogenisation of the sample is difficult if the<br />
peat is wet but can easily be carried out by hand<br />
using dry peat.However, drying peat, particularly<br />
samples from cold regions, could results in a loss<br />
of Hg by volatilisation.For this reason, tests of<br />
the effect of air-drying peat at room temperature<br />
on Hg content were carried out.The Hg profile of<br />
an Arctic peat core was measured twice; once<br />
using samples which had been kept frozen since<br />
collection and once using samples which had been<br />
air-dried overnight in a class 100 clean-air cabinet.<br />
All samples were measured in duplicate using the<br />
Leco AMA 254 program recommended here.Bulk<br />
density was determined for each sample as<br />
described below and from this, the volumetric<br />
y3<br />
concentrations (ng cm ) were calculated.<br />
To investigate the effect of prolonged drying at<br />
high temperatures and the effect of fertilisation<br />
upon Hg losses upon drying, bulk samples of peat<br />
from the ombrotrophic, pre-anthropogenic section<br />
(88–234 cm) of the EGR2A core was homogenised<br />
using a food mixer.The mixture was divided<br />
into five sections of 150 g each.Three sections<br />
were artificially fertilised with NH NO (1 mM),<br />
4 3<br />
Ca (PO ) (1mM), KCO (1 mM), respectively,<br />
3 4 2 2 3<br />
and a fourth was fertilised with a mixture of the<br />
three above additives (1 mM each).The fifth<br />
section was left unfertilised.These sections were<br />
then subsampled into five parts, which were dried<br />
at the following temperatures; RT, 30, 60, 90 and<br />
105 8C for the following times; 0, 19, 24, 48, 120,<br />
168 and 336 h.The drying was carried out in<br />
acid-cleaned, Teflon bowls, each containing 3.5 g<br />
of peat slurry.After drying, the samples were<br />
stored frozen, sealed in air-tight plastic bags until<br />
AAS Hg analysis using the Leco AMA 254.
132 F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
2.3. Effects of sample preparation: grinding<br />
samples<br />
Five samples of an in-house peat reference<br />
material were ground using a coffee mill.These<br />
samples were analysed for Hg using the Leco<br />
AMA-254 and the values obtained were compared<br />
to those obtained using five unground samples of<br />
the same material.<br />
2.4. Effects of sample preparation: water content<br />
in air-dried plugs<br />
The EGR2A core (co-ordinates CH 570.525,<br />
232.150) was collected on 26 August 1991.The<br />
core was taken using a Livingston corer (Aaby<br />
and Digerfeldt, 1986).The cylindrical core was<br />
initially taken in 1-m sections (total length 692<br />
cm, ds8 cm).The core was then sliced, frozen,<br />
into 2-cm slices.The slices were stored in individual<br />
airtight plastic bags at y18 8C until analysis.<br />
Slices from 46 to 592 cm were thawed before<br />
plugs were taken.Four plugs were taken from<br />
each slice.One plug from each slice was weighed<br />
wet.All the plugs were allowed to air dry in a<br />
class 100 clean air cabinet for 20 h.The air-dried<br />
plugs, which had been weighed wet, were reweighed<br />
after 20 h and then placed in an oven at<br />
105 8C until constant weight was obtained.The<br />
percentage water remaining in the air-dried plugs<br />
was then calculated from the air-dried weight and<br />
the constant dry weight of the plugs.This value<br />
for water content of air-dried samples was used to<br />
calculate the theoretical dry weight of the remaining<br />
air-dried plugs, which were subsequently analysed<br />
for Hg.<br />
2.5. Effects of peat properties: Hg concentrations<br />
in different bog plant species<br />
Twenty-three plant species were collected from<br />
the surface of the ombrotrophic bog at Etang de<br />
la Gruere ` in the Swiss Jura Mountains (1005 m)<br />
between July 1997 and September 2000.The<br />
samples were stored in air-tight plastic bags immediately<br />
after collection and were kept frozen until<br />
analysis.Samples were then air dried in a class<br />
100 laminar flow cabinet overnight and analysed<br />
for Hg content by AAS, using the Leco AMA<br />
254.<br />
2.6. Bulk density and water content in a peat<br />
monolith<br />
A peat monolith was collected at SWM (coordinates<br />
CH 631.250, 177.000) on 28 August,<br />
1991, using a Wardenaar corer (Wardenaar, 1987).<br />
The monolith obtained (10=10=100 cm) was<br />
stored at y18 8C after collection.It was then cut<br />
(frozen) into 1-cm slices, using a stainless steel<br />
band saw and the individual slices were again<br />
stored at y18 8C until analysis.The top 17 slices<br />
were used in the following analyses.A stainless<br />
steel tube with a sharpened end, of diameter 16mm<br />
was used to remove three plugs of known<br />
volume from each 1-cm slice.The wet weight of<br />
each plug was recorded and the plugs were then<br />
dried to constant weight in an oven at 105 8C.The<br />
dry weights were recorded and the plugs were then<br />
stored in air-tight plastic boxes, which had been<br />
soaked for 1 h in 10% HNO and rinsed six times<br />
3<br />
with water (R G18 V).<br />
H O<br />
2<br />
2.7. Effects of peat properties: variation in Hg<br />
concentrations within one 10=10=1 cm slice<br />
The slice 15 cm from the surface of SWM core<br />
was used to investigate the diversity of Hg concentrations<br />
within a single 10=10=1 cm slice of<br />
peat.The slice appeared to be homogenous in<br />
terms of composition of plant material.However,<br />
wood was removed from the samples before analysis.Sixteen<br />
plugs (four rows of four) were<br />
extracted as described above, at even distance<br />
from one another.The samples were analysed for<br />
Hg using the Leco AMA 254.The theoretical dry<br />
weight of the samples was calculated using their<br />
wet weights and the average water content of slice<br />
15, previously determined to be 93.0"0.4%. The<br />
Hg concentration was calculated and expressed as<br />
y1 ng g in dry weight of peat.<br />
3. Results<br />
3.1. Suitable peat analysis program using the Leco<br />
AMA 254<br />
Increasing the drying time from 9 to 500 s only<br />
increased the blank value from 0.020 Hg (ns2)
F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
Table 1<br />
Results of the analysis of six certified standard reference materials<br />
using the suggested program on the Leco AMA 254<br />
SRM Measured wHgx n Certified wHgx<br />
(ngyg) (ngyg)<br />
NIST 45.1"0.8 13 44"4<br />
1515<br />
NIST 32.3"1.4 17 31"7<br />
1547<br />
NIST 118.9"0.9 2 150"50<br />
1575<br />
NIST 99.2"2.7 2 93.8"3.7<br />
1630a<br />
BCR 16.6"0.5 2 21"2<br />
281<br />
IAEA 170.2"0.1 2 200"40<br />
336<br />
to 0.025 ng Hg (ns2).It was therefore concluded<br />
that the effect of the length of program was<br />
negligible with respect to increased blank values<br />
due to increased Hg from the oxygen supply during<br />
longer programs.<br />
The result of 10 analyses of in-house peat<br />
standard OGS 1878 P, which were made up to<br />
95% water (RH OG18<br />
V), using the recommended<br />
2<br />
y1<br />
drying times, was 84.0"18.0 ng g Hg: a relative<br />
standard deviation of 22%.The result of 10 anal-<br />
y1<br />
yses of the dry material was 76.6"2 ng g Hg:<br />
a relative standard deviation of 8%.Thus, analysis<br />
of dried samples appears to reduce the standard<br />
deviation of the results.<br />
Analysis using a decomposition time of 125 s<br />
resulted in the lowest standard deviation among<br />
10 analyses of OGS 1878P (1.9% compared to<br />
5.15, 8.87 and 9.68% at 100, 150 and 175 s,<br />
respectively).Six SRMs analysed using this program<br />
gave the results shown in Table 1.<br />
3.2. Effect of prolonged drying at high temperatures<br />
in unfertilised and artificially fertilised peat<br />
The results (Fig.1) show overall trends in<br />
changes in Hg concentration at a rate of 6.7 ng<br />
y1 kg y1 h y1 at RT, 2.48 ng kg y1 h at 30 8C, y<br />
y1 2.36 ng kg y1 h y1 at 60 8C, y3.12 ng kg y1 h<br />
y1 at 90 8C and y8.52 ng kg y1 h at 105 8C for<br />
these samples (Table 2).Therefore, it appears that<br />
there is an increase over time in wHgx in peat,<br />
133<br />
which is left to air dry at low temperatures,<br />
probably due to absorbance of Hg from the lab<br />
air.In contrast, there is a decrease in Hg concentrations<br />
in samples dried at higher temperatures,<br />
probably due to loss of Hg by volatilisation.This<br />
loss is so gradual that drying at low temperatures<br />
for a few hours should not measurably affect the<br />
Hg concentrations.However, prolonged drying at<br />
higher temperatures could result in a significant<br />
loss of Hg and extensive drying at room temperature<br />
could give rise to significant Hg<br />
contamination.<br />
Artificial fertilisation of the peat was carried out<br />
to stimulate microbial activity.Artificial fertilisation<br />
has been found in the past to increase Hg loss<br />
by volatilisation (Lodenius et al., 1983).Average<br />
changes in Hg concentrations over the whole<br />
y1 y1<br />
temperature range were y0.26 ng kg h for<br />
y1 y1<br />
N-fertilised peat, y2.38 ng kg h for P-<br />
y1 y1<br />
fertilised peat, 1.18 ng kg h for K-fertilised<br />
y1 y1<br />
peat, y3.08 ng kg h for N, P and K-fertilised<br />
y1 y1<br />
peat and y0.28 ng kg h for unfertilised peat.<br />
These results indicate that the addition of phosphorus<br />
in particular increases mercury losses, probably<br />
due to increased microbial activity.The<br />
addition of potassium, however, appeared to<br />
decrease Hg loss.<br />
3.3. Effect of air-drying at room temperature on<br />
Hg content of peat<br />
The Hg concentration profile in the Arctic peat<br />
core was measured once using samples which had<br />
remained frozen since collection and once using<br />
samples which had been air-dried at RT in a cleanair<br />
cabinet overnight.Both sets of samples were<br />
corrected for bulk density and the results are<br />
displayed as volumetric concentrations (ng cm , y3<br />
Fig.2).The average difference in Hg concentration<br />
between Hg content of the samples was 0.3"0.9<br />
y3 ng cm , ns63, with the wet samples being on<br />
average slightly lower in Hg than the air-dried<br />
samples.This difference can be accounted for by<br />
a combination of the error involved in the bulk<br />
density determination and uptake of Hg from the<br />
lab air during air-drying.However, the previous<br />
experiment suggested a rate of increase in Hg<br />
y1 y1<br />
concentration of 6.7 pg g h during air drying
134 F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
Fig.1.Hg concentrations measured in both unfertilised and artificially fertilised peat dried at RT, 30, 60, 90 and 105 8C for up to<br />
2 weeks.<br />
at RT and would therefore account for an increase<br />
y1<br />
of only 0.9 ng g , or 2%, during 14 h of air<br />
drying.It is therefore likely that most of the<br />
observed increase stems from error in the bulk<br />
density determination, which was high in this case<br />
due to the presence of ice in the peat.<br />
3.4. Effect of grinding samples<br />
Grinding promotes homogenisation of the sample<br />
by reducing particle size and by mixing.It<br />
also allows a greater mass of sample to be analysed<br />
at one time, as more material can be placed into<br />
each sample vessel.Therefore grinding allows a<br />
more representative value to be obtained.<br />
The average Hg concentration for unground<br />
y1<br />
samples was 47.9"1. 2 ng g (ns5) and the<br />
average for ground samples was 45.2"1.2 ng<br />
y1 g (ns5).It is therefore possible that a slight<br />
loss of Hg occurs on grinding, possibly due to<br />
elevated temperature, coupled with smaller particle
F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
Table 2<br />
Trends of Hg lossygain during drying in both unfertilised and artificially fertilised peat samples over time (up to 2 weeks) at various<br />
temperatures<br />
Trendline gradients<br />
Temperature N P K NPK Unfertilised Average Av.lossygain<br />
gradient in ngykg per h<br />
22 0.0045 0.0068 0.0165 0.005 0.0007 0.0067 6.7<br />
30 y0.0034 0.0036 0.012 y0.0025 0.0027 0.00248 2.48<br />
60 0.0004 y0.0063 y0.0097 0.0016 0.0022 y0.00236 y2.36<br />
90 y0.0014 y0.0047 y0.0005 y0.0062 y0.0028 y0.00312 y3.12<br />
105 y0.0014 y0.0113 y0.0124 y0.0133 y0.0042 y0.00852 y8.52<br />
av.gradient y0.00026 y0.00238 0.00118 y0.00308 y0.00028<br />
av.lossygain y0.26 y2.38 1.18 y3.08 y0.28<br />
in ngykg per h<br />
size within the grinder.To achieve a homogenised<br />
sample without loss of Hg, dried samples can be<br />
crushed by hand in a sealed plastic sample bag.In<br />
this way, a fine-grained powder can be obtained<br />
from the mossy part of the sample, although fibres<br />
from grass and wood remain intact.This facilitates<br />
the selection of the mossy part of the samples for<br />
Hg analysis, reducing the amount of grassy and<br />
woody material in the samples and therefore also<br />
reducing the variation in Hg concentration values<br />
caused by variation in peat type.The relative<br />
standard deviation in Hg concentration results,<br />
using samples homogenised in this way, measured<br />
in duplicate was 4.0% (ns265 duplicate pairs).<br />
3.5. Variation of water content in air dried plugs<br />
After drying overnight at RT in the clean air<br />
cabinet, the average water content of the plugs<br />
extracted from the EGR core was 9.1"2.0% (ns<br />
296).Water content of samples to be analysed can<br />
thus be calculated by comparison with a similarly<br />
sized and shaped sample, which has been allowed<br />
to dry for the same length of time and is subsequently<br />
dried to constant weight.<br />
3.6. Comparison of Hg concentrations in bog plant<br />
species<br />
The comparison of Hg concentrations in a collection<br />
of 23 plant species all collected from the<br />
surface of the one bog over a period of 4 years<br />
(Fig.3) shows an overall agreement among most<br />
135<br />
species in each year of collection (1997: 207"44<br />
y1 y1<br />
ng g , ns5; 1999: 47"29 ng g , ns10; 2000:<br />
y1<br />
50"45 ng g , ns20).Species which showed<br />
unusually high Hg concentrations are the mosses<br />
Sphagnum recurvum and Pseudivernia furfuracea<br />
and the needles and twigs, but not cones or bark,<br />
of the tree Pinus mugo.Omission of these from<br />
the data results in average concentrations of<br />
y1<br />
36"19 ng g , ns8 for 1999 and 32"14 ng<br />
y1 g , ns17 for 2000, i.e. reducing the standard<br />
deviation from 62 to 53% and 90 to 44%,<br />
respectively.<br />
3.7. Inconsistency in Hg concentration in a lateral<br />
peat slice<br />
Mercury concentrations of the 16 samples taken<br />
from one SWM peat slice were found to vary by<br />
y1 y1<br />
over 20%: 69.2"14.7 ng g , min. 41.4 ng g ,<br />
y1<br />
max.98.7 ng g Hg.These results indicate the<br />
importance of homogenising the peat moss prior<br />
to analysis andyor analysing several samples from<br />
each slice and averaging the results in order to<br />
obtain values representative of the whole slice.<br />
3.8. Bulk density and water content<br />
The average water content of the 17 slices of<br />
the SWM core analysed was 94.0"1.6%. The<br />
average relative standard deviation of the percentage<br />
of water in a single slice was 0.97%. These<br />
results indicate that water content fluctuation is<br />
negligible in the part of the core studied.
136 F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
Fig.2.Comparison of Hg concentration profiles measured in (a) frozen and (b) air-dried samples from a peat core from the High<br />
Arctic of Canada.<br />
However, the average bulk density for all the<br />
y3<br />
samples studied was 0.05"0.02 g cm and the<br />
average relative standard deviation of bulk density<br />
within a slice was 15.6% (ns16).This is a<br />
significant fluctuation, indicating that bulk density<br />
variation should be taken into account when comparing<br />
Hg values from different parts of a core<br />
and should be determined throughout the whole<br />
core if its values are to be used to calculate Hg<br />
flux data.<br />
4. Discussion<br />
The results of the experiments above indicate<br />
that great care must be taken during peat sample<br />
preparation and Hg analysis in order to obtain<br />
accurate and representative results.<br />
Although the Leco AMA 254 is a suitable<br />
instrument for Hg analysis in both wet and dry<br />
peat samples, drying facilitates homogenisation of<br />
the peat and also allows a greater amount of<br />
sample to be analysed and therefore a more representative<br />
value to be obtained.Analysis of dry<br />
samples also resulted in a lower standard deviation<br />
than analysis of wet samples.Air drying at room<br />
temperature overnight appeared, in this set of<br />
experiments, not to result in a significant loss or<br />
gain of Hg in the samples, even in peat from the<br />
High Arctic.However, prolonged drying was<br />
shown to lead to significant increases in Hg concentrations,<br />
due to uptake of Hg from the lab air.<br />
Prolonged drying at higher temperatures lead to an<br />
overall decrease in Hg concentrations and should<br />
therefore be avoided in total Hg studies.This is in
F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
Fig.3.Hg concentrations measured in 23 peat-forming plant species collected from the surface of one bog over a period of 4 years.<br />
N.B. Only Sphagnum collected in 1997.<br />
agreement with the findings of Norton et al. (1997)<br />
and Martinez-Cortizas et al. (1999).Fertilisation<br />
with phosphorus increased Hg losses, probably due<br />
to increased microbial activity.Variation in the<br />
water content of air-dried plugs is small and can<br />
be corrected by measuring a comparable plug from<br />
the same slice, which has been dried in the same<br />
manner.<br />
Mercury concentrations vary greatly between<br />
different bog plants and even between different<br />
137<br />
parts of the same plant species, with certain mosses<br />
and trees having Hg concentrations much higher<br />
than average.Differences in vegetation composition<br />
can exist between bogs or even within the<br />
same bog at different times.This could potentially<br />
affect the Hg record and also the comparability of<br />
records from different bogs.It is therefore suggested<br />
that leaves, grass and wood be removed<br />
from the samples before Hg analysis.However,<br />
even Hg concentrations between different moss
138 F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
species or between mosses growing within different<br />
microclimates on the surface of a bog could<br />
be inconsistent (Norton et al., 1997).Mercury<br />
concentrations within one small horizontal section<br />
of peat may be uneven.Several subsamples should<br />
be taken from each peat slice in order to obtain a<br />
representative Hg concentration for the whole<br />
slice.Because large fluctuations in bulk density<br />
values can occur throughout a peat core, bulk<br />
density should be determined in each slice to allow<br />
Hg flux rates to be calculated accurately.<br />
Finally, mixing together the moss component of<br />
the subsamples increases the homogeneity of the<br />
material to be analysed.Here, grinding in a coffee<br />
mill resulted in a slight loss of Hg.However,<br />
simple hand mixing of the dried samples held in<br />
a plastic bag resulted in low standard deviation of<br />
duplicate pairs.<br />
5. Conclusions<br />
The following protocol is proposed for the<br />
determination of mercury concentrations in solid<br />
peat samples:<br />
Cores should be transported frozen from the<br />
field to the laboratory, if possible, to avoid unnecessary<br />
compaction and losses of water or Hg.The<br />
peat should be kept in clean (wrapped airtight in<br />
plastic), cool conditions until analysis.The edge<br />
of the core should be removed prior to analysis in<br />
case of contamination (by smearing) during core<br />
collection.Several subsamples should be analysed<br />
from each peat slice in order to obtain a representative<br />
value.These subsamples can be air-dried at<br />
room temperature in a clean environment, such as<br />
a Class 100 laminar flow cabinet, without significant<br />
loss of mercury.During this period, the<br />
cabinet should be darkened to avoid light-enhanced<br />
evasion of mercury from the samples (Gustin and<br />
Maxey, 1998).Dried subsamples can be homogenised<br />
by crushing air-dried plugs of peat together<br />
into a powder and mixing; this can be done by<br />
hand, with the samples in a sealed plastic bag.<br />
One or more subsamples from each slice should<br />
be used for bulk density determination, which is<br />
required to allow mercury deposition fluxes to be<br />
calculated.Bulk density can be determined from<br />
the dry weight of a peat subsample of known<br />
volume.Air drying this subsample with the subsamples<br />
to be used for mercury analysis (of the<br />
same shape and volume) before drying it in a<br />
drying oven to constant weight allows the water<br />
content of the air-dry samples to be accurately<br />
estimated; this information can be used to correct<br />
the masses of the samples analysed for Hg to their<br />
true dry weights.<br />
Suggested times for a Leco AMA 254 air-dry<br />
peat analysis program are: 30 s (drying), 125 s<br />
(decomposition) and 45 s (waiting for emission<br />
of waste gases before Hg content determination by<br />
AAS).<br />
Acknowledgments<br />
Financial support for this work, including graduate<br />
student assistantships to F.R. and N.G., was<br />
provided by the Swiss National Science Foundation<br />
(grants 21-55669.98 and 21-061688.00) to<br />
W.S. Peat core collection in the High Arctic of<br />
Canada was made possible by a research grant to<br />
W.S., Heinfried Scholer ¨ (University of Heidelberg)<br />
and Stephen Norton (University of Maine) by the<br />
International Arctic Research Centre, Fairbanks,<br />
Alaska.Many thanks to Drs W.O.Van der Knaap,<br />
E.Feldmeyer, A.Gruenig and A.Holzer for plant<br />
identification and B.Eilrich for considerable field<br />
assistance.<br />
References<br />
Aaby B, Digerfeldt G.Handbook of Holocene Paleoecology<br />
and Paleohydrology.Sampling techniques for lakes and bogs<br />
New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.p.181 –194.<br />
Benoit JM, Fitzgerald WF, Damman AWH.The biogeochemistry<br />
of an ombrotrophic peat bog: evaluation of use as an<br />
archive of atmospheric mercury deposition.Environ Res<br />
Sect A 1998;78:118 –133.<br />
Burgess, N., Beauchamp,S., Brun, G., Clair, T., Roberts, C.,<br />
Rutherford, L., Tordon, R.,Vaidya,O. Mercury in Atlantic<br />
Canada A Progress Report, Environment Canada, Atlantic<br />
Region.Environment Canada Report, 1998.<br />
Environmental Protection Agency.EPA method 7473:Mercury<br />
in solids and solutions by thermal decomposition, amalgamation,<br />
and atomic absorption spectrophotometry.1998.<br />
Gustin MS, Maxey R.Mechanisms influencing the volatile<br />
loss of mercury from soil.Proceedings of Air and Waste<br />
Management Association: Measurement of toxic and related<br />
air pollutants.Carty, NC Sept.1–3, 1998.
F. Roos-Barraclough et al. / The Science of the Total Environment 292 (2002) 129–139<br />
Jensen A, Jensen A.Historical deposition rates of mercury in<br />
Scandinavia estimated by dating and measurement of mercury<br />
in cores of peat bogs.Water Air Soil Pollut<br />
1991;56:769 –777.<br />
Lodenius M, Ari S, Antti U-R.Sorption and mobilisation of<br />
mercury in peat soil.Chemosphere 1983;12(11y12):1575 –<br />
1581.<br />
Madsen PP.Peat bog records of atmospheric mercury deposition.Nature<br />
1981;293:127 –130.<br />
Martinez-Cortizas A, Pontvedra-Pombal X, Garcia-Rodeja E,<br />
Novoa-Munoz JC, Shotyk W.Mercury in a Spanish peat<br />
bog: archive of climate change and atmospheric metal<br />
deposition.Science 1999;284:939 –942.<br />
Norton SA, <strong>Evan</strong>s GC, Kahl JS.Comparison of Hg and Pb<br />
fluxes to hummocks and hollows of ombrotrophic Big Heath<br />
Bog and to nearby Sargent Mt.Pond, Maine, USA.Water<br />
Air Soil Pollut 1997;100:271 –286.<br />
Salvato N, Pirola C.Analysis of mercury traces by means of<br />
solid samples atomic absorption spectrometry.Microchim<br />
Acta 1996;123(1–4):63 –71.<br />
Shotyk W, Weiss D, Appleby PG, Cheburkin AK, Frei R,<br />
Gloor M, Kramers JD, Reese S, van der Knaap WO.History<br />
139<br />
of Atmospheric Lead Deposition Since 12,370 14C yr BP<br />
from a Peat Bog, Jura Mountains, Switzerland.Science<br />
1998;281:1635 –1640.<br />
Shotyk W, Goodsite ME, Roos F, Heinemeier J, Rom W,<br />
Appleby PG, Frei R, Van der Knaap WO, Cheburkin AK,<br />
Reese S,Biester H, Lohse C, Hansen TS.Atmospheric Hg,<br />
Pb and As in peat cores from Greenland and Denmark dated<br />
210<br />
using the 14C AMS bomb pulse technique and Pb:<br />
concentrations, natural and anthropogenic enrichments, and<br />
fluxes.Submitted to Environ Planetary Sci Lett, 2001.<br />
Wardenaar ECP.A new hand tool for cutting peat.Can J Bot<br />
1987;65:1772 –1773.<br />
Weiss D, Shotyk W, Schaefer H, Loyall U, Grollimund E,<br />
Gloor M.Microwave digestion of ancient peat and determination<br />
of lead by voltammetry.Fresenius J Anal Chem<br />
1999a;363:300 –305.<br />
Weiss D, Shotyk W, Appleby PG, Cheburkin AK, Kramers<br />
JD.Atmospheric Pb deposition since the Industrial Revolution<br />
recorded by five Swiss peat profiles: enrichment<br />
factors, fluxes, isotopic composition, and sources.Environ<br />
Sci Technol 1999b;33:1340 –1352.
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 8: Shotyk, W., Goodsite, M.E., Roos-Barraclough, F., Frei, R., Heinemeier, J., Asmund, G.,<br />
Lohse, C., Hansen, T.S. Anthropogenic contributions to atmospheric Hg, Pb and As<br />
accumulation recorded by peat cores from southern Greenland and Denmark dated using<br />
the 14C “bomb pulse curve”. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta accepted 02 June, 2003.
Monday, June 2, 2003<br />
Anthropogenic contributions to atmospheric Hg, Pb and As<br />
accumulation recorded by peat cores from southern Greenland and<br />
Denmark dated using the 14 C “bomb pulse curve”<br />
W. SHOTYK 1* , M.E. GOODSITE 2# , F. ROOS-BARRACLOUGH 3$ , R. FREI 4 , J. HE<strong>IN</strong>EMEIER 5 ,<br />
G. ASMUND 6 , C. LOHSE 7 , T.S. HANSEN 7<br />
*1, Institute of Environmental Geochemistry, University of Heidelberg, <strong>IN</strong>F 236, D-69120<br />
Heidelberg, GERMANY<br />
tel +49 (6221) 54 4803 fax +49 (6221) 54 5228<br />
email: shotyk@ugc.uni-heidelberg.de<br />
2, Department of Atmospheric Environment, National Environmental Research Institute of<br />
Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O. Box 358, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark<br />
3, Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Berne, Baltzerstrasse 1-3, CH-3012 Berne,<br />
Switzerland<br />
4, Geological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen<br />
Denmark<br />
5, AMS 14C Dating Laboratory, IFA, Aarhus University, Denmark<br />
6, Department of Arctic Environment, National Environmental Research Institute,<br />
Frederiksborgvej 399, P.O. Box 358, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark<br />
7, Environmental Chemistry Research Group, Department of Chemistry, University of<br />
Southern Denmark, Odense University, Campusvej 55, Odense M, Denmark<br />
# present address (M.E.G.): Environmental Chemistry Research Group, Department of<br />
Chemistry, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University, Campusvej 55, Odense M,<br />
Denmark<br />
$ present address (F. R-B.): Chemical Analytical R&D, Cilag AG, Hochstrasse 201, CH-8205<br />
Schaffhausen, Switzerland<br />
first submitted to Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 17.9.02<br />
REVISED VERSION SUBMITTED 15. APRIL 2003; provisionally accepted 24.4.03<br />
EDITORIAL IMPROVEMENTS TO TEXT COMPLETED 2.6.03 ACCEPTED 2.6.03
ABSTRACT<br />
Mercury concentrations are clearly elevated in the surface and sub-surface layers of<br />
peat cores collected from a minerotrophic (“groundwater-fed”) fen in southern Greenland (GL)<br />
and an ombrotrophic (“rainwater-fed”) bog in Denmark (DK). Using 14 C to precisely date<br />
samples since ca. AD 1950 using the “atmospheric bomb pulse”, the chronology of Hg<br />
accumulation in GL is remarkably similar to the bog in DK where Hg was supplied only by<br />
atmospheric deposition: this suggests not only that Hg has been supplied to the surface layers<br />
of the minerotrophic core (GL) primarily by atmospheric inputs, but also that the peat cores have<br />
preserved a consistent record of the changing rates of atmospheric Hg accumulation. The lowest<br />
Hg fluxes in the GL core (0.3 to 0.5 µg/m 2 /yr) were found in peats dating from AD 550 to AD<br />
975, compared to the maximum of 164 µg/m 2 /yr in AD 1953. Atmospheric Hg accumulation<br />
rates have since declined, with the value for 1995 (14 µg/m 2 /yr) comparable to the value for<br />
1995 obtained by published studies of atmospheric transport modelling (12 µg/m 2 /yr).<br />
The greatest rates of atmospheric Hg accumulation in the DK core are also found in<br />
the sample dating from AD 1953 and are comparable in magnitude (184 µg/m 2 /yr) to the GL<br />
core; again, the fluxes have since gone into strong decline. The accumulation rates recorded by<br />
the peat core for AD 1994 (14 µg/m 2 /yr) are also comparable to the value for 1995 obtained by<br />
atmospheric transport modelling (18 µg/m 2 /yr). Comparing the Pb/Ti and As/Ti ratios of the DK<br />
samples with the corresponding crustal ratios (or “natural background values” for pre-<br />
anthropogenic peat) shows that the samples dating from 1953 also contain the maximum<br />
concentration of “excess” Pb and As. The synchroneity of the enrichments of all three elements<br />
(Hg, Pb, and As) suggests a common source, with coal-burning the most likely candidate.<br />
Independent support for this interpretation was obtained from the Pb isotope data ( 206 Pb/ 207 Pb<br />
= 1.1481 ± 0.0002 in the leached fraction and 1.1505 ± 0.0002 in the residual fraction) which<br />
2
is too radiogenic to be explained in terms of gasoline lead alone, but compares well with values<br />
for U.K. coals. In contrast, the lowest values for 206 Pb/ 207 Pb in the DK profile (1.1370 ± 0.0003<br />
in the leached fraction and 1.1408 ± 0.0003 in the residual fraction) is found in the sample dating<br />
from AD 1979: this shows that the maximum contribution of leaded gasoline occurred<br />
approximately 25 years after the zenith in total anthropogenic Pb deposition.<br />
3
<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION<br />
Atmospheric pollution in the industrial regions of the northern hemisphere is<br />
increasingly recognised as a potential threat to many life forms in the Arctic (AMAP, 1998). The<br />
present state of the Arctic environment has been summarised as follows (Braune et al., 1999):<br />
1) some native groups are among the most exposed populations in the world to certain<br />
environmental pollutants; 2) the levels of organic and inorganic contaminants in birds and<br />
mammals may exceed thresholds associated with reproductive, immunosuppressive, and<br />
neurobehavioral effects; 3) mercury seems to be increasing in aquatic sediments and in marine<br />
mammals, and tends to accumulate in marine food webs. The most significant knowledge gap<br />
at the present time is the “lack of temporal trend information for most contaminants” (Braune<br />
et al., 1999).<br />
In contrast to the other "heavy metals" of environmental concern, Hg can be singled<br />
out as a truly global pollutant because 1) more than 95% of atmospheric Hg is in the vapour<br />
phase where it has a residence time of at least one year (Lin and Pehkonen, 1999) and can be<br />
transported thousands of kilometres (Schroeder and Munthe, 1998), and 2) it is the only metal<br />
which indisputably biomagnifies through the food chain, as inorganic forms of the metal are<br />
methylated by bacteria (Lindberg et al., 1987). Accumulation of Hg in the Arctic environment<br />
is of particular concern because of bioaccumulation of its methylated forms (Morel et al., 1998)<br />
and their potential toxicity (Fitzgerald and Clarkson, 1991). However, the relative importance<br />
of natural versus anthropogenic sources of Hg to the Arctic is poorly understood and there is an<br />
urgent need for long term records to quantify fluxes due to anthropogenic emissions.<br />
To quantify the effects of human activities of the atmospheric geochemical cycle of<br />
Hg, the natural variability in the Hg cycle must be known, and this can only be obtained using<br />
long-term records of Hg accumulation. Ombrotrophic peat bogs receive inputs exclusively from<br />
4
the air (Clymo, 1987). Boyarkina et al. (1980) suggested that peat cores from these types of bogs<br />
preserve a record of the changing rates of atmospheric Hg deposition. This view has been<br />
supported by independent experimental evidence (Oechsle, 1982), and by several subsequent<br />
studies of Hg concentrations in dated peat cores from temperate bogs (Pheiffer-Madsen, 1981;<br />
Jensen and Jensen, 1991; Norton et al., 1997; Benoit et al., 1997). The first long-term<br />
reconstruction of atmospheric Hg deposition was obtained using a Spanish bog which has been<br />
accumulating peat since since 4070 14 C yr BP; this study not only showed that anthropogenic<br />
sources have exceeded natural contributions for more than a millenium (Martinez-Cortizas et al.,<br />
1999), but also that cold climate phases promote atmospheric Hg accumulation which has<br />
important implications for polar regions. More recently, a peat bog in Switzerland (Etang de la<br />
Gruère in the Jura Mountains) has been used to create a high-resolution reconstruction of<br />
atmospheric Hg deposition extending back 14,500 calendar years (Roos-Barraclough et al.,<br />
2002): here, the natural range of Hg fluxes (0.3 to 8 µg/m 2 /yr) was found to be impacted both<br />
by Holocene climate change and volcanic emissions. Anthropogenic Hg was quantified using<br />
the natural range of Hg to Br to calculate “excess” Hg; this revealed the appearance of<br />
anthropogenic Hg beginning in the late Medieval Period. A subsequent study of a neighbouring<br />
peat bog in the Swiss Jura provided a comparable chronology of atmospheric Hg accumulation,<br />
even though the second bog (La Tourbière des Genevez) became predominately minerotrophic<br />
with increasing depth (Roos-Barraclough and Shotyk, 2003). Thus, the chemical weathering<br />
reactions which have been taking place in the basal sediment underlying the peat bog had not<br />
contributed significantly to the Hg inventory of the profile. The maximum rates of atmospheric<br />
Hg accumulation in the Swiss peat bog profiles was 29-43 µg/m 2 /yr, with higher rates<br />
consistently found in the forested bog (TGE).<br />
To date, there are no long term records of atmospheric Hg deposition for the Arctic,<br />
5
and the relative importance of natural versus anthropogenic sources to such remote areas has<br />
aroused controversy (Rasmussen, 1994; Fitzgerald et al., 1997). To address this problem, we<br />
measured Hg concentration profiles in mires from Greenland and Denmark which have been<br />
accumulating peat for more than 3000 years (Goodsite, 2000). In fact, the south Greenland site<br />
is sub-Arctic but, the core collected here is of special importance because the past 50 years of<br />
peat accumulation has been precisely dated with 14 C using the “atmospheric bomb pulse”<br />
(Goodsite et al., 2002); this offers the promise of a detailed reconstruction of recent changes. As<br />
the peat profile from Denmark was also age dated using the same, high precision approach<br />
(Goodsite et al., 2002), it was also included in our study for comparison.<br />
To compare with Hg, we have also studied Pb, which is transported primarily in the<br />
fine (sub-micron) aerosol fraction (Puxbaum, 1991). Several characteristics of Pb render this<br />
element a particularly useful tracer for studying atmospheric deposition of trace metals and<br />
organic contaminants. First, it is known to be well preserved in ombrotrophic bogs (Vile et al.,<br />
1995, 1999; Shotyk et al., 1996, 1997; MacKenzie et al., 1997, 1998; Weiss et al., 1999a,b), with<br />
bogs recording Pb chronologies which are comparable with lake sediment archives (Bränvall et<br />
al., 1997; Cortizas et al., 1997; Farmer et al., 1997; Norton et al., 1997) and historical records<br />
of ancient Pb mining (Kempter et al., 1997; Kempter and Frenzel, 1999, 2000). Second, long-<br />
term changes in the environmental pollution record of this element in Europe is comparatively<br />
well established (e.g. Shotyk et al., 1998, 2001, 2003). Third, Pb has a number of radiogenic<br />
isotopes which can be used to “fingerprint” the predominant sources of atmospheric pollutants<br />
(Kober et al., 1999; Bollhöfer and Rosman, 2001; Flament et al., 2002; Reuer and Weiss, 2002).<br />
Finally, we also measured As as this element is commonly enriched in coal (Bouska, 1981;<br />
Valkovic, 1983; Swaine, 1990).<br />
METHODS<br />
6
Description of the peat deposits<br />
The two peatlands studied are distinctly different with respect to hydrology,<br />
geochemistry and trophic status: an acidic (pH 4) ombrotrophic bog in Denmark contrasts<br />
strongly with a circumneutral (pH 7) minerotrophic fen in Greenland.<br />
The peatland near the village of Tasiusaq in southern Greenland (GL) is a small,<br />
confined subarctic fen on the Narsaq peninusla (61 o 08.314` N, 45 o 33.703` W) of southern<br />
Greenland (Fig. 1). The average annual temperature and rainfall at Narsarsuaq airport (opposite<br />
the fjord) were 0.9 o C and 615 mm, respectively, from 1961 to 1990 (Danish Meteorological<br />
Institute, Technical Report 00-18). The site was cored in September 1999, towards the end of the<br />
growing season. Representative plant species and photos of the fen as well as the general area<br />
are given elsewhere (Goodsite, 2000). The maximum thickness of peat accumulation is ca. 1 m.<br />
The basal material is predominately clay, with aquatic plant species dominating the deepest 10<br />
cm of peat accumulation (W.O. van der Knaap, University of Berne, personal communication);<br />
ascending from this zone, the peat consists predominately of mosses. The fen developed between<br />
two small lakes, and may have formed through the terrestrialization of a shallow lake basin. A<br />
small brook, ca. 1m wide and 1 m deep, runs through the fen, connecting the lakes.<br />
Topographically the mire is in a valley between steep mountains - but there was no visual<br />
indication that the peat deposit may have formed from a landslide. The fen surface today is<br />
characterized by small hummocks (20 to 40 cm high), and the ground is very spongy.<br />
The bedrock geology of this part of S. Greenland belongs to the Qassiarsuk complex<br />
which consists of a sequence of alkaline silicate tuffs and extrusive carbonatites interlayered with<br />
sandstones and their subvolcanic equivalents (Andersen, 1997). This complex is located in a<br />
roughly E-W trending graben structure between the village of Qassiarsuk and the settlement of<br />
Tasiusaq in the northern part of the Precambrian Gardar rift. Uranium mineralisations<br />
7
corresponding to the alkaline igneous activities have been found, with the alkaline, high<br />
conductivity waters marked by anomalous U concentrations both in the aqueous phases and in<br />
the sediments (Armour-Brown et al., 1983).<br />
Storelung Mose in Denmark is a typical raised Sphagnum bog (55 o 15.38' N, 10 o 15.37'<br />
E) on the island of Funen (Fig. 1). The average annual temperature and rainfall were 8.1 o C and<br />
639 mm, respectively, from 1961 to 1990 (Danish Meteorological Institute, Technical Report<br />
99-5). The bog had a history of peat digging lasting through the end of WWII (Bent Aaby,<br />
Danish National Museum, personal communication): this fact had been established prior to core<br />
collection, but the condition was considered tolerable as this study emphasises the chronology<br />
of atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As deposition since AD 1950 (which is datable using the 14 C<br />
atmospheric bomb pulse procedure). With most of the peat bogs in Denmark having been<br />
destroyed by man, the number of remaining possible coring sites which are suitable for<br />
atmospheric deposition studies really is rather limited. The bog is situated in a rural farming<br />
community, and when viewed from the edge, is seen to rise above the landscape. The peat<br />
deposit is 5 to 6 m deep with a relatively flat microtopography. Today's bog bears visible scars<br />
of disturbance, with an overgrown cart road through the middle of the bog, and excavation pits<br />
close to the trail. The pits are now overgrown with mats of moss. The sampling site chosen was<br />
as far from visible signs of peat digging as possible, in the NE section of the bog. Samples were<br />
collected in October, 1999 from zones intermediate in relief between hummocks and hollows.<br />
Sample collection and preparation<br />
Coring sites were located with obvious peat accumulation and three (15 cm x 15 cm<br />
by approximately 100 cm) monoliths of peat were cored at each site using a Ti Wardenaar peat<br />
sampler (Wardenaar, 1987). Three cores (labelled A, B, and C) were taken at each site, with each<br />
ca. 1.5 m apart, and forming a triangle. "A" cores were cut into 3 cm slices by hand in the field,<br />
8
and porewaters were expressed by hand for subsequent chemical analyses.<br />
Chemical analyses of porewaters and the trophic status of the mires<br />
Pore water samples were kept cool. Upon returning to the lab, all water samples were<br />
filtered to exclude material greater than 0.2 :m using polysulfone membrane filters (Acrodisc,<br />
Gelman), and refrigerated. Anions (Cl - and Br - ) and cations (Na + , K + , Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ ) in the waters<br />
were measured using chemically suppressed ion chromatography with conductivity detection<br />
(Steinmann and Shotyk, 1997). Each of the porewater samples was analyzed in duplicate both<br />
for anions and for cations.<br />
The pH of the surface waters at GL is neutral to alkaline and the porewaters typically<br />
contain ca. 20 mg/l Ca 2+ ; this is typical of minerotrophic fens and indicates the importance of<br />
mineral dissolution reactions, both within the peatland and in the surrounding basin, which<br />
control the composition of the waters (Shotyk, 1988). In contrast to the GL fen, the pH of the bog<br />
waters from DK is acidic (pH 4) and the porewaters contain only ca. 2 mg/l Ca 2+ ; this is typical<br />
of ombrotrophic bogs, and shows that mineral dissolution reactions are quantitatively<br />
insignificant: this is true because of the limited supply of minerals for reaction with the surface<br />
waters of the bog. The low pH value and low concentrations of Ca 2+ in the porewaters, therefore,<br />
indicates that mineral matter is supplied to the DK core only from the atmosphere, and this must<br />
be true also of trace metals such as Hg and Pb.<br />
Measurement of Pb and other trace element analyses using XRF<br />
Peat cores were frozen within one day of sample collection, and shipped frozen to the<br />
lab in Berne. Individual slices from the “A” cores were partially thawed and a plexiglass<br />
template (10 x 10 cm) was used to allow the outer 2.5 cm of each slice to be trimmed away using<br />
an acid rinsed ceramic knife on a plastic cutting board; clean lab procedures were followed,<br />
cleaning the cutting board and knife with deionized water three times between each slice. The<br />
9
edges cut off the slices were dried overnight at 105 o C in a drying oven and milled in a<br />
centrifugal mill equipped with a Ti rotor and 0.25 mm Ti sieve (Ultracentrifugal Mill ZM 1-T,<br />
F. K. Retsch GmbH and Co., Haan, Germany). The milled powder from pieces of each slice was<br />
then manually homogenized prior to using the powder for further analysis. Selected major and<br />
trace elements (K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Br, Rb, Sr, Y, Zr and Pb) were measured<br />
using the Energy-dispersive Miniprobe Multielement Analyzer (EMMA) using Mo K$ as the<br />
exciting radiation. The lower limits of detection for the elements reported here, on a dry weight<br />
basis, are Mn 12, Fe 5, Cu 1, As 3.0, Se 0.4, Br 0.7, Rb 0.5, Sr 0.6, Y 1.0, Zr 1.5, Pb 0.4 and U<br />
2 µg/g. Calibration of the instrument using international, certified, standard reference materials<br />
(SRMs), and the accuracy and precision of the trace metal measurements, are described in detail<br />
elsewhere (Cheburkin and Shotyk, 1996; Shotyk et al., 2000). Using the EMMA XRF, As<br />
concentrations are calculated as ([Pb]+[As]) - [As] but this is acceptable considering the<br />
abundance of As in the surface layers of the DK core (see below). Moreover, As is used here<br />
only to compare its distribution with that of Hg and Pb.<br />
The XRF data from the 3 cm slices (core A) not only provides quantitative information<br />
about the concentrations of various elements in the peat profiles, but also offers a general<br />
indication of the trophic status of the sites.<br />
Ash contents were measured by combustion at 550 o C overnight.<br />
Measurement of Hg<br />
The second set of cores (GL and DK “B” cores) were used for Hg analyses and age<br />
dating. One cm slices were cut while frozen using a stainless steel band saw. The "zero" depth<br />
of the monolith was taken to represent the interface between the living plant material at the top,<br />
and the underlying dead plant matter (peat); this transition was typically 3 cm below the top of<br />
the core. Individual slices were subsampled using a stainless steel microcorer (ca. 16 mm ID)<br />
10
to recover ca. 2 cm 3 plugs from every cm down to 40 cm, and every 2 nd cm below 40 cm; these<br />
were air-dried overnight at room temperature in a Class 100 laminar flow clean air cabinet.<br />
Mercury concentrations were measured in these plugs using solid sample atomic absorption<br />
spectroscopy (Salvato and Pirola, 1996) with a LECO AMA 254 as described in detail elsewhere<br />
(Roos-Barraclough et al., 2002). The instrument was calibrated using liquid Hg working<br />
standards prepared from a Merck 1000 mg/l Hg standard solution. Every 12th measurement was<br />
a certified reference material, either NIST 1515 (Apple Leaves) or NIST 1547 (Peach Leaves).<br />
The average measured values were 45.0 ± 0.7 ng/g (n=11) for NIST 1515 (certified value 44 ±<br />
4 ng/g) and 32.1 ± 1.4 ng/g (n=15) for NIST 1547 (certified value 31 ± 7 ng/g). The Hg<br />
concentration profiles presented here (analyst: F. R-B.) are in excellent agreement with those<br />
reported previously (analyst: M.E.G.) for selected samples from the same cores (Goodsite, 2000).<br />
As an independent check on the data which are presented here, Hg concentrations were<br />
also measured in a complete set of subsamples at the Department of Arctic Environment, Danish<br />
National Environmental Research Institute (analyst: G.A.). Approximately 1 g fresh sample and<br />
4 ml concentrated Merck Suprapur nitric acid were added to Teflon bombs with stainless steel<br />
caps, which were then heated for 12 hours at 150/C. After cooling the dissolved samples were<br />
left uncovered until the majority of the nitrous oxides had evaporated. Before analysing for Hg,<br />
potassium permanganate solution was added until a permanent pink colour was obtained in order<br />
to maintain an oxidising environment and to prevent loss of Hg. The samples were then diluted<br />
with 18 MS water to approximately 25 g in polyethylene bottles. Mercury concentrations were<br />
determined following reduction with sodium borohydride in a flow injection AAS system<br />
(Perkin Elmer FIMS). The data set obtained using this procedure is in good agreement with the<br />
data which is presented in this paper, obtained using the LECO AMA 254 (on average, within<br />
15%, r 2 = 0.727, n=65).<br />
11
Age dating using 14 C<br />
Plant macrofossils identified in selected samples from each “B” core were 14 C dated<br />
by using Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS). The macrofossils were taken from the centers<br />
of selected one-cm slices at the Institute of Plant Science, University of Berne, where they were<br />
also cleaned and dried at 60 /C. Within one week of selection they were processed at the AMS<br />
14 C Dating Laboratory, University of Aarhus, using a standard procedure for plant material<br />
(washed, acid-base-acid treatment). Individual samples more recent than AD 1950 were dated<br />
directly by comparing the measured 14 C concentrations in the samples with the atmospheric<br />
concentrations of 14 C recorded since the beginning of thermonuclear bomb testing; these tests<br />
greatly increased the amount of 14 C in the atmosphere, resulting in an “atmospheric bomb pulse”<br />
(ABP). The high resolution age dates obtained this way are ± 2 years. All details describing the<br />
AMS 14 C dating method and the application of the atmospheric bomb pulse, as well as a<br />
comparison with 210 Pb age dating of the same set of peat samples, is given elsewhere (Goodsite<br />
et al., 2002). Since the publication of that paper (Goodsite et al., 2002), approximately twice the<br />
number of samples has been age dated, with all results summarised here (Tables 1, 2). Selected<br />
samples from deeper layers (before AD 1950) were AMS 14 C dated by the usual tree-ring<br />
calibration method; here, the uncertainties are much greater (Tables 1, 2).<br />
In addition to the 14 C age dates obtained using AMS, the basal peat sample from each<br />
“A” core was dated using 14 C decay counting (Physics Institute, University of Berne) which<br />
yielded ages of 3540 ± 30 and 2790 ± 40 14 C yr BP for the bottom sample of the GL (78cm) and<br />
DK (84cm) cores, respectively.<br />
Stable Pb isotopes<br />
Powdered samples of peat were analysed at the Danish Center for Isotope Geology for<br />
stable lead isotopes ( 204 Pb, 206 Pb, 207 Pb, 208 Pb) in two fractions: weak acid leachates which are<br />
12
designed to recover predominantly atmospheric lead adhering to the plant material, and from the<br />
corresponding residues which primarily represents geogenic lead hosted in the inorganic,<br />
minerotrophic matrix, as well as atmospherically-derived soil dust (Table 3). Leaching of the<br />
peat material was performed with 2N HCl for two hours. The samples were then centrifuged and<br />
the supernatant was carefully pipetted off. The residues were attacked by 8N HBr for 1 day, then<br />
dried and subsequently re-attacked using an HF-HNO 3 mixture for 2 days in Savillex Teflon<br />
beakers. This procedure has been shown to be effective in dissolving both phosphates and<br />
silicates (Frei et al., 1997; Schaller et al., 1998). Lead was processed and separated over 0.5 ml<br />
glass columns charged with a 100 mesh AG-1 x8 anion exchange resin (BIORAD) and purified<br />
in a second clean-up over 200 µl Teflon columns containing the same resin. Liquid aliquots<br />
of both leachates and residues were doped with a 204 Pb spike for isotope dilution concentration<br />
measurements. Lead separates were loaded with a 1M H 3 PO 4 - silica-gel mix and measured<br />
from 20 µm Re-filaments on a VG-54 Sector-IT thermal ionization mass spectrometer at the<br />
Geological Institute, University of Copenhagen. Lead isotopes were analyzed in static multi-<br />
collection mode. Procedural blanks remained below 110 pg Pb: this is insignificant relative to<br />
the amount of Pb contained in the samples. Isotopic fractionation of Pb was monitored by<br />
repeated analyses of the NBS-SRM 981 Pb standard, and the measured data were corrected for<br />
mass bias using the values of Todt (1993).<br />
RESULTS<br />
Mercury concentrations in relation to ash contents and dry bulk density<br />
The large differences in ash contents illustrate the fundamental hydrological<br />
differences between the two peat profiles. In the GL core (Fig. 2a), ash concentrations are in the<br />
range of ca. 10 to 40% whereas the peat samples below 30 cm in the DK core typically contain<br />
ca. 2 % ash (Fig. 2b); these values are typical of minerotrophic and ombrotrophic peats,<br />
13
espectively (Naucke et al., 1993). There is an exceptional zone of elevated ash content in the<br />
DK core at ca. 18cm (Fig. 2b), which may reflect the disturbance of the bog surface by peat<br />
cutting during WWII. Bulk density values are generally higher in the GL core (Fig. 2a) compared<br />
to DK core (Fig. 2b).<br />
The Hg concentration profiles reveal elevated Hg concentrations in both the upper and<br />
lower sections of the GL core (Fig. 2b), but only in the upper section of the DK core (Fig. 2b).<br />
To take into account the large differences in bulk density within and between the two cores, the<br />
Hg concentrations are also expressed on a volumetric basis (Fig. 2). The variation in volumetric<br />
Hg concentrations above 30 cm show a remarkable similarity between the two cores, with a very<br />
intense peak in volumetric Hg concentration in the GL core at 21 cm (Fig. 2a) and in the DK<br />
core at 17 cm (Fig. 2b), respectively. The selected age dates shown in Fig. 2 indicate that the<br />
zone of greatest Hg concentration in each core dates from the 1950`s. The very old radiocarbon<br />
ages in the DK peat samples below 29 cm (which was dated at 2395 ± 45 14 C yr BP) is evidence<br />
that some part of the original peat surface has been lost due to peat cutting. These old sections<br />
of the DK profile will not be considered further.<br />
Mercury concentrations in ombrotrophic (DK) versus minerotrophic (GL) peat profiles<br />
The chronology of changes in volumetric Hg concentrations is remarkably similar at<br />
the two sites (Fig. 2). The DK core is ombrotrophic, therefore Hg was supplied to this profile<br />
exclusively by atmospheric deposition. The greatest Hg concentrations are found in samples<br />
dating from the 1950`s. As there are no known natural geochemical processes which could have<br />
led to this pronounced Hg enrichment, we assume that the elevated Hg concentrations in the<br />
surface layers, compared to deeper, older peats, reflect increased rates of atmospheric Hg<br />
deposition caused by industrial activities. Similarly, in the GL core the greatest Hg<br />
concentrations are found in samples dating from the 1950`s. In contrast to the DK core, the GL<br />
14
profile is minerotrophic, and the possible importance of Hg provided by mineral-water reactions<br />
has to be carefully considered. However, we know of no natural geochemical processes which<br />
could have enriched the surface of this core with Hg without also enriching the middle section<br />
of the core, between ca. 30 and 55 cm, which contain the lowest Hg concentrations. We further<br />
assume, therefore, that the elevated Hg concentrations in the surface layers of the GL core also<br />
can be attributed to atmospheric Hg inputs. Other possible causes of the changes in Hg<br />
concentrations in the GL core will be discussed later in the paper.<br />
Atmospheric Hg accumulation rates in southern Greenland<br />
The age dates given in Table 1 can be used to calculate an age-depth model to estimate<br />
peat accumulation rates (Fig. 3). This process identifies three regions, indicated by the three<br />
regression lines (Fig. 3). These regression lines serve as an age model from which the age of any<br />
depth can be deduced. In the ca. 3000 year period before AD 1950, the average peat<br />
accumulation rate was 0.019 cm/yr (Fig. 3a); from AD 1950 to ca. 1976, the accumulation rate<br />
was 0.68 cm/yr, and since ca. 1976 the rate has been 0.20 cm/yr (Fig. 3b). The age depth model<br />
allows the atmospheric Hg accumulation rate to be estimated as the product of the volumetric<br />
Hg concentrations (ng/cm3) and the peat accumulation rate (cm/yr). Strictly speaking, the<br />
atmospheric Hg accumulation rate calculated in this way is equal to the depositional flux minus<br />
re-emission of Hg from the peatland surface. Experimental studies using peat (Lodenius, 1983)<br />
have shown that Hg re-emissions are small (ie. < 0.01% of total Hg added as 203 Hg ) so that the<br />
atmospheric Hg accumulation rates shown here (in units of :g/m 2 /yr versus age in Figure 4) are<br />
comparable to the depositional fluxes. These results show that the net, pre-industrial Hg<br />
accumulation rate ranged from 0.3 to 3 :g/m 2 /yr (Fig. 4a) which is comparable to the range (0.3<br />
to 8 :g/m 2 /yr) obtained from ca. 12,500 BC to 1300 AD using a Swiss peat bog profile (Roos-<br />
Barraclough et al., 2002). The graph shows further that the net Hg accumulation rate prior to AD<br />
15
200 was in the range 1 to 3 :g/m 2 /yr, whereas samples from AD 550 to AD 975 were in the<br />
range 0.3 to 0.5 :g/m 2 /yr (Fig. 4a). While some part of this variation in pre-industrial<br />
accumulation rates may be due to Holocene climate change (Martinez-Cortizas et al., 1999;<br />
Roos-Barraclough et al., 2002), the elevated Hg concentrations in samples below 55 cm (dated<br />
at AD 938 ± 48 (Fig. 2b) are found in minerotrophic peats, and we cannot yet separate the Hg<br />
concentrations into atmospheric, aquatic, and terrestrial components. However, it is clear that<br />
the pre-industrial, net rates of Hg accumulation in GL were in the range 0.3 to 3 :g/m 2 /yr (Fig.<br />
4a), placing an upper limit on the natural atmospheric Hg flux.<br />
In contrast to the “natural background” Hg accumulation rate, the flux in GL reached<br />
164 :g/m 2 /yr in 1953 (Fig. 4b). The value in 1995 (14.1 :g/m 2 /yr) is an order of magnitude<br />
lower, but still exceeds by a wide margin the natural range in net Hg accumulation rate shown<br />
in Fig. 4b. The value obtained here for 1995 is in good agreement with the Danish Eulerian<br />
Hemisphere model calculations (12.0 :g/m 2 /yr in 1995) published for South Greenland<br />
(Christensen et al., 2002), supporting the approach used here to estimate the atmospheric Hg<br />
fluxes. The error associated with the Hg fluxes (Fig. 4) is calculated to be 21%, based on<br />
conservative estimates of the errors associated with the 14 C bomb pulse curve age dates (ca. 5%),<br />
Hg concentrations (ca. 5%), and bulk density measurements (ca. 20%). Even after the upper and<br />
lower limits on the flux data are added to Fig. 4, the temporal trends in net atmospheric Hg<br />
accumulation rates are clear.<br />
Atmospheric Hg accumulation rates in southern Denmark<br />
While the DK core cannot be used to model the age-depth relationship for samples<br />
older than WWII, the age dates (Table 2) yield an average peat accumulation rate from AD 1950<br />
to AD 1980 of 0.47 cm/y, and since AD 1980 of 0.21 cm/yr (Fig. 3d). Using these peat<br />
accumulation rates, the net atmospheric Hg accumulation rate can be calculated and is shown<br />
16
in Fig. 4c. This graph shows that the maximum net Hg accumulation rate was 184 :g/m 2 /yr in<br />
AD 1953 and that the flux has since gone into a strong decline. The value obtained from this peat<br />
core for 1994 (14 :g/m 2 /yr) is comparable to the Danish Eulerian Hemisphere model calculations<br />
(18 :g/m 2 /yr in 1995) published for Denmark (Christensen et al., 2002).<br />
The elevated ash content in the DK core which reaches a maximum at 15-16 cm (Fig.<br />
2b), is probably a consequence of disturbance to the peat profile; unfortunately, this layer is<br />
adjacent to the zone of maximum Hg concentration at 16-17 cm (Fig. 2b). It is difficult to<br />
determine what effect this disturbance may have had on the Hg concentration profile, the peat<br />
growth rate and therefore the Hg accumulation rate. However, the maximum Hg accumulation<br />
rates presented here (Fig. 4) are comparable to those published using other Danish peat cores by<br />
Pheiffer-Madsen (1981). In addition, Hg and Br concentrations were measured in a peat core,<br />
which we collected in the spring of 2000 from Store Vildmose, a second ombrotrophic bog in<br />
Denmark. In the Store Vildmose core, the “background” Hg/Br ratio is 0.32 x 10 -3 ± 0.12 x 10 -3<br />
(average of 41 samples below 20 cm) and the maximum Hg/Br ratio (3.05 x10 -3 ) found from 6<br />
to 7 cm exceeds this value by 9.6 times (data not shown). In the Storelung Mose profile<br />
described in this paper, the maximum Hg/Br ratio (3.73 x10 -3 ) exceeds this background ratio by<br />
11.7 times. Thus, the changes in Hg/Br at Storelung Mose, despite the disturbance by peat<br />
cutting in the past, are comparable in magnitude to the changes recorded by the peat core<br />
collected from Store Vildmose (Shotyk, unpublished data). In addition, the maximum Hg<br />
concentration in the Store Vildmose core (348 ng/g) and the maximum in Hg/Br (3.05 x10 -3 )<br />
were dated to AD 1953 using 210 Pb; this agrees remarkably well with the age date of the peak in<br />
Hg concentration at Storelung (AD 1953) which was determined using the bomb pulse curve of<br />
14 C (Fig. 2b). In summary, the Hg concentration data presented here for the Storelung bog, as<br />
well as the Hg/Br ratios and the chronology of Hg accumulation, are comparable to our<br />
17
unpublished data for these parameters from the Store Vildmose bog.<br />
Comparison of Pb and As concentrations and enrichments, GL versus DK<br />
Lead and As concentrations are much higher in the DK core compared with GL (Fig.<br />
5a). However, the maximum Pb concentrations in the DK core are very similar to the maximum<br />
values found in the Draved Mose peat profile described by Aaby and Jacobsen (1978). To<br />
emphasize the difference in Pb and As between the GL and DK profiles, and to take into account<br />
the differences in abundance of mineral material, Enrichment Factors (EF) were calculated as<br />
EF = ([M]/[Ti]) peat / ([M]/[Ti]) Earth`s crust<br />
where [M] refers to the total concentration of Pb or As measured in the peat sample (µg/g) and<br />
[Ti] to the total concentration of Ti. Although Sc is the preferred reference element for these<br />
calculations (Shotyk et al., 2001), Sc concentration data is not yet available for these two peat<br />
cores. The EF indicates the extent of elemental enrichment in the peats, relative to the abundance<br />
of that metal in the Earth`s Upper Crust (Wedepohl, 1995) where Pb = 14.8, As = 1.7 and Ti =<br />
4010 µg/g. The calculated Enrichment Factors (Fig. 5a) show that these elements are enriched<br />
in the DK core up to 65x (Pb) and 85x (As). In contrast, the GL core reveals no significant<br />
enrichment of Pb, and only very slight enrichments of As. Given that the As concentrations in<br />
the GL profile are generally at or below the lower limit of detection by XRF (3 µg/g), any record<br />
of anthropogenic As in the GL profile cannot be discerned using the total concentrations of As<br />
as measured by XRF, and its ratio to Ti. Similarly, in the GL core the Pb concentrations are<br />
comparatively low and concentrations of lithogenic trace elements such as Ti and Zr are<br />
comparatively high; thus, using total metal concentrations it is not possible to discern any<br />
significant impact of anthropogenic Pb. In the DK core, just the opposite is true: concentrations<br />
of Pb and As are high but the concentrations of lithogenic elements (Ti, Zr) are comparatively<br />
low. Thus, in the DK core, enrichments of Pb and As, relative to their crustal abundance, are<br />
(i)<br />
18
clearly seen (Fig. 5a).<br />
Changing atmospheric Pb fluxes in Denmark<br />
In the DK core, all of the Pb was derived from the atmosphere. Given the immobility<br />
of Pb in ombrotrophic peat bog profiles (Shotyk et al, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2003; Weiss et al.,<br />
1999a,b and references cited therein), the atmospheric Pb flux can be calculated (Fig. 5b) using<br />
the average peat accumulation rates, the Pb concentrations, and the bulk density data. This flux<br />
can be further separated into “lithogenic” and “anthropogenic” components using Ti as an<br />
indicator of the concentration of lithogenic-derived aerosols supplied by rock weathering:<br />
[Pb] lithogenic = [Ti] sample x [Pb/Ti] Earth`s Crust<br />
Notice that for most samples, the total Pb flux and anthropogenic Pb flux are nearly identical<br />
because the concentrations of lithogenic Pb are so low. Both the atmospheric Pb flux in DK (Fig.<br />
5b) and the relative importance of anthropogenic Pb(Fig. 5c) have been declining since the<br />
1950`s (Fig. 5b).<br />
Isotopic composition of Pb in peat from GL and DK<br />
The concentrations of Pb measured in the leachable and residual fractions, as well as<br />
the isotopic composition of this Pb (summarized as the 206 Pb/ 207 Pb ratio), are shown in Figure<br />
6. The large difference in total Pb concentrations between the DK and GL cores described earlier<br />
(seen in the “A” cores which were measured using XRF and presented in Fig. 5a) is also seen<br />
in the “B” cores where Pb concentrations were measured in selected samples using IDMS (Fig.<br />
6a, b). However, the leaching study undertaken using TIMS indicates two additional features.<br />
First, the abundance of “leachable” Pb tends generally to be more abundant than the “residual”<br />
Pb (except for two samples from GL). In the DK core in particular, the predominance of<br />
leachable Pb is most clearly associated with the samples containing the highest total Pb<br />
concentrations (Fig. 6a), with the highest concentration found at 15-16cm (141.4 µg/g Pb in the<br />
(ii)<br />
19
leachable fraction, and 32.1 µg/g Pb in the residual fraction). For comparison with these<br />
concentrations, the “natural background” concentration of Pb in pre-anthropogenic peats in<br />
Switzerland dating from ca. 8,000 to 5,000 14 C yrs BP is approximately 0.2 µg/g Pb, and this<br />
difference indicates in a general way the extent to which the DK core has been contaminated by<br />
industrial Pb. The isotopic composition of Pb in the two fractions, summarized here as the<br />
206 Pb/ 207 Pb ratio (Fig. 6b), is virtually identical and this clearly demonstrates a common origin<br />
of the Pb in both fractions. One possible explanation of the similarity in Pb isotopic composition<br />
in each of the DK peat fractions is that anthropogenic Pb supplied by various industrial<br />
emissions has been scavenged by soil-derived aerosols supplied by crustal weathering, such that<br />
the “soil dust signature” has been overprinted by anthropogenic Pb. A second possible<br />
explanation is that the “residual” fraction obtained by the extraction procedure has included<br />
some of the “leachable” Pb supplied primarily by anthropogenic sources.<br />
Second, the isotopic composition of Pb in the two peat cores is very different, with the<br />
GL samples being far more radiogenic (Fig. 6b). The pattern in 206 Pb/ 207 Pb in the DK core is<br />
remarkably similar to the temporal variation in 206 Pb/ 207 Pb seen in four peat profiles from<br />
Switzerland (Weiss et al., 1999a), as well as the record of 206 Pb/ 207 Pb reported for Sphagnum<br />
moss samples from the University of Geneva herbarium (Weiss et al., 1999b). The ratio<br />
206 Pb/ 207 Pb in the Upper Continental Crust (Kramers and Tolstikhin, 1997) as well as in pre-<br />
anthropogenic (dating from 8,000 to 5,300 14 C yr BP), atmospheric aerosols from Switzerland<br />
(Shotyk et al., 2001), is approximately 1.2. All of the measured values from the DK core are<br />
significantly less radiogenic than this, indicating that anthropogenic Pb has dominated the<br />
atmospheric Pb inputs to the DK bog.<br />
Predominant sources of anthropogenic, atmospheric Pb and As in Denmark<br />
The lithogenic Pb fraction derived from atmospheric soil dust can be estimated as the<br />
20
product of the Ti concentrations of the DK profile, and the Pb/Ti ratio of the Earth`s Crust<br />
(Wedepohl, 1995); this assumes that lithogenic Pb is derived exclusively from atmospheric soil<br />
dust, and that the Pb/Ti ratio of this dust is similar to that of the Earth`s Crust. Using the Ti<br />
concentrations which are available for the top 20 cm of the “B” cores, the “lithogenic” Pb<br />
component has been calculated (Fig. 6c) and in all cases, it is small even compared to the<br />
“residual” Pb fraction measured using TIMS. The lithogenic Pb fraction of the DK peat profile<br />
has also been estimated using Zr as the conservative, lithogenic reference element, but the<br />
outcome is much the same (Fig. 6c).<br />
One disadvantage of this approach is that the Pb/Ti and Pb/Zr ratios of atmospheric<br />
soil dust may not be identical to the corresponding values for the Earth`s Upper Crust (UC) as<br />
reported by Wedepohl (1995). In an earlier paper of a Swiss peat bog profile, we found that the<br />
“background” Pb/Sc ratio in pre-anthropogenic aerosols dating from ca. 5,000 to 8,000 14 C yr<br />
BP was approximately 4x the value presented by Wedepohl (1995) for the UC (Shotyk et al.,<br />
1998). To take into account these findings, we have also calculated the concentrations of<br />
“lithogenic” Pb for the DK core using “background” values of Pb/Ti = 4x UC (Fig. 6c).<br />
However, even taking the value of Pb/Ti = 4x UC, the theoretical “lithogenic” Pb component in<br />
many samples is still ca. one-half of the concentrations measured in the “residual” fraction. The<br />
differences between the “residual” fraction measured using TIMS and the “lithogenic” fraction<br />
calculated using Pb and Ti (or Zr) concentrations indicate that further studies are needed to better<br />
quantify the isotopic composition of the “natural” Pb component of peats which are impacted<br />
by anthropogenic Pb.<br />
Using the concentrations of Ti, Pb, and As, it is possible to estimate the contribution<br />
of anthropogenic Pb and As to the inventories of these elements in the DK peat core, because the<br />
“lithogenic” Pb or As fraction is small compared to the total concentrations. Taking Ti as an<br />
21
indicator of the concentration of aerosols supplied by rock weathering, the concentration of Pb<br />
(or As) which was supplied to the bog via atmospheric deposition of soil-derived aerosols can<br />
be estimated using Eqn (ii). Here, we have calculated the “lithogenic” Pb component using both<br />
Pb/Ti = UC and Pb/Ti = 4x UC (Fig. 6c). With respect to As, we recently reported As/Sc ratios<br />
for pre-anthropogenic, atmospheric aerosols (for the same Swiss bog, and the same period of<br />
time as for Pb/Sc) which are approximately 10x the ratio for the UC (Shotyk et al., 2002b); here,<br />
therefore, we have calculated “lithogenic” As using both As/Ti = UC and As/Ti = 10x UC (Fig.<br />
6c). Once the lithogenic Pb (or As) component has been quantified, anthropogenic Pb (or As)<br />
is calculated as<br />
[Pb] anthropogenic = [Pb] total - [Pb] lithogenic<br />
The calculated values for lithogenic and anthropogenic Pb and As calculated in this way are<br />
shown in Figure 6c, along with a graph of the ratio 206 Pb/ 207 Pb, and selected 14 C age dates<br />
(Table 2). Notice that both sets of calculations for each element indicate that the anthropogenic<br />
component dominates the Pb and As inventories in this section of the DK core.<br />
The maximum concentration of anthropogenic Pb and As is found in peats dating from<br />
1954; this matches the maximum flux of atmospheric Hg (Fig. 2b and Fig. 4c), and suggests a<br />
common source: this is most likely coal, as coal is commonly enriched in all three of these<br />
elements (Bouska, 1981; Valkovic, 1983; Swaine, 1990); Zn (not shown) is also clearly enriched<br />
at this depth. The data presented here (Figs. 2b, 4c, and 6c) suggest that the maximum extent of<br />
atmospheric Pb, As, and Hg contamination in Denmark had already peaked in 1954, and has<br />
more or less declined ever since. It is noteworthy that the Clean Air Act was passed in the U.K.<br />
in 1956, primarily to reduce the industrial emission of particulates and gases from burning coal.<br />
Given that the industrial heartland of the U.K. is nearly due west of Denmark and that the<br />
predominant wind direction is from west to east, British coal burning is likely to be an important,<br />
(iii)<br />
22
if not predominant source of these contaminants. According to the compilation published by<br />
Farmer et al. (1999), British coal consumption peaked in the early 1950`s. Taken together, it<br />
appears that the changing accumulation rates of anthropogenic Hg, Pb and As revealed by the<br />
DK peat core may reflect to a large extent the history of the British coal industry and the<br />
chronology of the Second Industrial Revolution.<br />
To further evaluate the possible link between these contaminants and British coals, the<br />
ratio 208 Pb/ 206 Pb has been plotted against the 206 Pb/ 207 Pb values (Fig. 7). Clearly, the DK peat<br />
samples are much closer in isotopic composition to the values for British coals (Farmer et al.,<br />
1999) than they are to the values for U.K. gasoline leads (Monna et al., 1997). Thus, the Pb<br />
isotope data, combined with the chronology of the enrichments in Hg, Pb and As concentrations,<br />
suggest that coal burning was the main source of these contaminants to the DK peat profile.<br />
In samples above ca. 20 cm in the DK profile, there is a sharp shift (after AD 1959)<br />
toward much less radiogenic values 206 Pb/ 207 Pb (Fig. 6c) which reflects the growing importance<br />
of leaded gasoline contributions; the ores used to synthesize alkyllead compounds for gasoline<br />
such as Pb from the Broken Hills mine of Australia, have had 206 Pb/ 207 Pb values as low as 1.04.<br />
The most recent sample in the profile (AD 1999) shows significantly more radiogenic values,<br />
compared to the 1970`s, clearly reflecting the reduction in gasoline Pb concentrations, and the<br />
eventual phasing-out of leaded gasoline in Europe; this change is also seen in four peat profiles<br />
from Switzerland (Weiss et al., 1999a, Shotyk et al., 2003), as well as the record of 206 Pb/ 207 Pb<br />
reported for Sphagnum moss samples from the University of Geneva herbarium (Weiss et al.,<br />
1999b). It is important to emphasise that the decline in anthropogenic Pb concentrations<br />
(starting in 1954) which is shown in Figure 6c pre-dates by approximately 25 years the minimum<br />
in 206 Pb/ 207 Pb; the minimum in this Pb isotope ratio corresponds to the maximum impact in<br />
gasoline Pb emissions (Shotyk et al., 2002a). As noted earlier, this decline in 206 Pb/ 207 Pb was<br />
23
caused by the introduction of gasoline leads of Australian origin with very low 206 Pb/ 207 Pb<br />
values. The minimum 206 Pb/ 207 Pb value (in 1979) is consistent with production records which<br />
indicated leaded gasoline consumption in Europe reached its zenith in 1980 (Hagner, 2000).<br />
Moreover, direct air Pb measurements in Denmark document strong declines in Pb<br />
concentrations since the late 1970`s (Jensen and Fenger, 1994). However, there appears to be no<br />
published air Pb data older than ca. 1970. The Pb isotope results presented in Fig. 6c are<br />
significant, as they show that the greatest percentage of anthropogenic Pb recorded by the peat<br />
profile in DK was not caused primarily by leaded gasoline consumption, but rather from coal-<br />
burning and other industrial sources. Moreover, these results show that anthropogenic Pb went<br />
into decline well before either the introduction of maximum allowable Pb concentration in<br />
gasoline (in 1978 in the EU according to Hagner, 2000), or the ban on leaded gasoline sales in<br />
the EU in 1987 (Hagner, 2000). While leaded gasoline certainly contributed to a pronounced<br />
shift in the isotopic composition of Pb-bearing aerosols, other sources of anthropogenic Pb were<br />
quantitatively more important in DK during the first half of the 20 th century. Similar conclusions<br />
were drawn from a recent study of duplicate peat cores from a Swiss bog which showed a<br />
maximum in Pb EF pre-dating the minimum in 206 Pb/ 207 Pb (Shotyk et al., 2003).<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Natural sources of Hg to the minerotrophic GL core<br />
The elevated Hg concentrations in the uppermost layers of the GL core are effectively<br />
contemporaneous with those of the DK core (Fig. 2) which has received Hg solely from<br />
atmospheric deposition. Given the fundamental differences in the hydrology and geochemistry<br />
of the two sites (ombrotrophic, acidic bog in DK, minerotrophic, alkaline fen in GL), and the<br />
differences in peat accumulation rates (Fig. 3), it is unlikely that natural processes could have<br />
caused such a similar chronology of atmospheric Hg. The most likely explanation for the<br />
24
elevated Hg concentrations in the surface layers of the GL profile, therefore, is the changing<br />
rates of anthropogenic emissions of Hg to the atmosphere during the past century. However, the<br />
possible importance of other sources of Hg to the GL core also require consideration.<br />
atmospheric soil dust<br />
The concentrations of mineral matter in peat profiles may vary because of temporal<br />
changes in atmospheric soil dust deposition rates, organic matter decomposition, or both.<br />
Titanium, Zr, and Y are conservative, lithogenic elements in the sense that their oxides and<br />
silicates are resistant to chemical weathering, and their distribution in the peat profiles reflects<br />
the abundance of mineral material (Fig. 8a). Rubidium is found primarily in K feldspar where<br />
it substitutes for K, and its distribution in the profile generally resembles that of Zr and Y (Fig.<br />
8a); Rb too, therefore, provides an indication of the abundance and distribution of mineral matter<br />
in the profile. In the DK profile, the measured values of these elements are in a range typical of<br />
ombrotrophic bogs which receive minerals exclusively from atmospheric soil dust (Shotyk et al.,<br />
2001). In contrast, these elements are typically 5x more abundant in the minerotrophic GL<br />
profile (Fig. 8a) core. Assuming that the lowest concentrations of Hg in the GL profile (1.6<br />
ng/cm 3 at 47 cm) represent pre-Industrial, “background” values, the maximum concentration<br />
(24.0 ng/cm 3 at 21 cm) exceeds this value by 15x. This concentration difference greatly exceeds<br />
the variation in Zr concentrations over the same distance (1.6x as shown in Fig. 8a). Therefore,<br />
the variation in mineral matter supply (e.g. from changes in the flux of atmospheric soil dust) is<br />
not a viable explanation of the magnitude of the variation in Hg concentrations with depth.<br />
marine aerosols<br />
The porewaters of the GL and DK cores typically contain ca. 10 mg/l Cl - , compared<br />
to continental ombrotrophic peat bogs from Switzerland which average ca. 0.3 mg/l Cl -<br />
(Steinmann and Shotyk, 1997). While the elevated chloride concentrations in the GL and DK<br />
25
porewaters reveals the influence of sea salt spray at both locations, and while this may be a<br />
natural source of Hg to the cores, the relative importance of this source must have been relatively<br />
constant over time. Thus, atmospheric deposition of marine aerosols cannot explain the change<br />
in Hg concentrations with respect to depth and time seen in both peat profiles (Fig. 2).<br />
aquatic inputs via chemical weathering of local soils and rocks<br />
The low abundance of Ca and Sr (Fig. 8b) in the DK core (average 0.40 % and 25.7<br />
µg/g, respectively) is typical of ombrotrophic bogs (Shotyk et al., 2001) which receive inputs<br />
exclusively from the atmosphere. In contrast, the higher Ca and Sr concentrations in the GL core<br />
(average 2.2 % and 347 µg/g, respectively) demonstrate extensive rock-water interaction<br />
characteristic of minerotrophic mires (Fig. 8b). Similarly, Mn and Fe are much more abundant<br />
in the GL profile (Fig. 8b). The relatively high pH of the waters combined with the abundance<br />
of Ca and Sr in the peats indicates active dissolution of carbonate minerals, either in the<br />
sediments underlying the peat, in the watershed, or both (Shotyk, 2002). The elevated Mn<br />
concentrations in the surface layers of both cores may either be due to plant uptake and<br />
recycling, oxidation, or both. Iron concentrations are very high in the GL profile, and are<br />
strongly enriched in the uppermost layers: this is most likely a redox-related transformation<br />
(Steinmann and Shotyk, 1997) as the Fe concentrations are well in excess of the concentration<br />
required by growing plants. Like Ca and Sr, the Mn and Fe which have been supplied to the GL<br />
profile may originate in carbonate mineral phases in the surrounding rocks and underlying<br />
sediments (Andersen, 1997). However, between 47 and 21 cm where the Hg concentrations<br />
increase by 15x, there is no change in the Sr concentrations (Fig. 8b). Thus, weathering of local<br />
rocks and soils cannot explain the increasing Hg concentrations in the uppermost, recent layers<br />
of the GL peat profile.<br />
Natural geochemical processes and their effects on Hg in the minerotrophic GL profile<br />
26
decomposition of organic matter<br />
The bulk density of the samples at 47 and 21 cm in the GL profile differ only by a<br />
factor of 1.7x (Fig. 2a), in contrast with the differences in Hg concentrations (15x). We assume<br />
that the bulk density of a given type of peat is a reflection of the extent of its decomposition<br />
(degree of humification). Support for this assumption comes from a detailed spectroscopic<br />
characterisation of organic matter in the Swiss peat bog profile at Etang de la Gruère (Cocozza<br />
et al., 2003). Bulk density, therefore, helps to take into account any changes in metal<br />
concentrations which take place during the decomposition of organic matter. In a recent paper<br />
about Hg accumulation rates in peat cores from Patagonia, Biester et al. (2003) suggested that<br />
bulk density is not an adequate parameter to express changes in peat humification, and that Hg<br />
accumulation rates (calculated as we have described here) should be corrected for humification<br />
to take into account mass loss during decay. However, in the GL peat profile, the difference in<br />
bulk density at 47 versus 21 cm (1.6x) is similar to the difference in Zr concentrations (1.7x).<br />
Zirconium is a conservative element which resides almost exclusively in zircon, and this element<br />
(along with other conservative trace metals) should increase in concentration with increasing<br />
extent of peat decay. In fact, the differences in Zr concentrations are comparable to the<br />
differences in bulk density; taken together these data suggest that the differences in humification<br />
alone cannot explain differences in Hg concentrations by more than a factor of two. As a<br />
consequence of these data and arguments, it is unlikely that physical processes such as organic<br />
matter decomposition can explain the magnitude of the variation in Hg concentrations with depth<br />
in the GL profile.<br />
redox-related processes in the oxic zone<br />
It has been suggested that redox-related transformations of Fe and Mn in marine and<br />
lacustrine sediments may contribute to Hg enrichments in the surface layers of these sediments.<br />
27
For example, Hg may become adsorbed onto Fe and Mn oxides which are formed when Fe (II)<br />
and Mn (II) in the anoxic zone diffuse upward and become oxidized (Gobeil et al., 1999).<br />
Asmund and Nielsen (2000) have summarised some of these studies, and document very strong<br />
correlations between Mn and Hg or Fe and Hg in some lake sediment cores. While peatlands do<br />
not have an overlying water column for Mn and Fe to diffuse into, they may have a shallow oxic<br />
zone, depending on the depth to water table which varies seasonally (Shotyk, 1988). The shapes<br />
of the Mn and Fe concentration profiles in the GL core (Fig. 8b) suggest that there may be some<br />
oxidation of Fe and Mn in the surface and near surface layers. To help evaluate the possible<br />
importance of this process on the Hg concentration profile, samples from the uppermost 20 cm<br />
of the “B” cores (1 cm slices) were also measured for trace elements, including Mn and Fe, using<br />
XRF (Fig. 9). Except for the elevated Mn concentration in the top layers at DK, the DK core<br />
reveals no peak in either element. In contrast, the GL core shows a pronounced enrichment of<br />
Mn at 12-13 cm, and Fe at 15-16 cm (arrows in Fig. 9). However, these Mn and Fe peaks are<br />
well above the peak in volumetric Hg concentrations which is found in the GL core between 20<br />
and 25 cm (Fig. 2a). The elevated Hg concentrations beginning at ca. 25 cm at GL, therefore, is<br />
independent of those of Mn and Fe, suggesting that redox-related transformations of Mn and Fe<br />
have not noticeably affected Hg. While redox-related transformations of Mn and Fe are probably<br />
operating within the peat profile, there has been no observable effects of these changes on the<br />
Hg profile. The elevated Hg concentrations in the near surface layers, therefore appears to be<br />
mainly influenced by atmospheric deposition. Thus, even in the minerotrophic peat profile at GL,<br />
the Hg concentration profile appears to provide a record of the changing rates of atmospheric Hg<br />
deposition.<br />
redox-related processes in the anoxic zone<br />
Mercury is highly enriched in all of the peat layers below 50 cm of the GL peat profile,<br />
28
compared to the lowest concentrations in the middle of the core (Fig. 2a). As these samples are<br />
more than one thousand years old, natural geochemical processes must be invoked to explain the<br />
Hg enrichments. Copper concentrations are also elevated in the deeper layers of the GL core, and<br />
the Cu/Y ratio illustrates the pronounced enrichment of this metal with increasing depth (Fig.<br />
10a). Similarly, U concentrations reach more than 100 µg/g (Fig. 10a) which is ca. 50x crustal<br />
abundance and 2000x the concentration found in ombrotrophic peats. Again, normalising the U<br />
concentrations to Y, the U/Y ratio reveals the shape of the U enrichment (Fig. 10a). Both Cu and<br />
U are commonly enriched in anoxic, minerotrophic peats due to reductive dissolution Cu(II) to<br />
Cu(0) and U(VI) to U(IV), respectively (Shotyk, 1988). The zone of maximum Cu and U<br />
enrichment is found in the limnic peat layer made up predominately of the remains of aquatic<br />
plants just above the basal sediment; previous studies also revealed enrichments of Cu and U in<br />
this zone of some Canadian bogs (Shotyk et al., 1992).<br />
Bromine and Se are both supplied to these peatlands from sea salt spray, but the Se/Br<br />
ratio (Fig. 10b) indicates that the deeper peat layers at GL are preferentially enriched in Se.<br />
While the variations in Br concentrations can largely be explained in terms of the decay of<br />
organic matter, this process alone cannot explain the large increase in Se concentrations with<br />
depth through the GL profile. The general shape of Se (Fig. 10b), however, resembles that of U<br />
and Cu/Y (Fig.10a), suggesting that a redox-related process has contributed to the Se enrichment.<br />
The pronounced enrichments of Cu and U (as evident by their ratios to Y) and Se (revealed by<br />
comparison to Br) at the same depths as the enrichment of Hg (Fig. 2b) suggest that the natural<br />
Hg enrichments in the deeper peat layers of the GL profile are related to redox transformations.<br />
The details of this process, however, are unclear. Given that the solubility product constant of<br />
Hg selenide (K sp = 10 -62 ) is orders of magnitude lower than even that of Hg sulphide (K sp = 10 -<br />
52 ), it may be that Se has played a direct role in the natural enrichment of Hg toward the bottom<br />
29
of the GL profile.<br />
Comparison with marine and lacustrine sedimentary records of Hg accumulation<br />
Age dated lake sediments from across the Arctic have been measured for Hg and the<br />
ratio of post-industrial to pre-industrial Hg accumulation rates were found to be in the range 0.7<br />
to 9 (Landers et al., 1998). The authors admit, however, that their study was hampered in many<br />
cases by local metal sources contributing to high background values: this is a fundamental<br />
problem with lake sediment archives, as metals are supplied by atmospheric as well as non-<br />
atmospheric sources. In cases where “background” values are elevated due to natural,<br />
geochemical sources, the additional impact of anthropogenic Hg may be difficult to detect.<br />
Asmund and Nielsen (2000) studied Hg in marine sediments from Greenland, and found that Hg<br />
fluxes had increased only by a factor of two, compared to the values for sediments from the<br />
previous century. Bindler et al. (2001) examined many lake sediment profiles from Greenland,<br />
and reported concentration increases of only 2 to 3 x from pre-industrial to post-industrial times.<br />
In each of these cases, however, the measured Hg accumulation rates reflect not only<br />
atmospheric inputs, but also inputs to the sediments from the entire watershed (from physical and<br />
chemical weathering) as well as focusing processes within the sedimentary basin. In contrast,<br />
the GL peat profile studied here provides the first long-term record of atmospheric Hg<br />
accumulation in Greenland. Because the surface peat layers receive Hg only from the air, it<br />
provides a much more sensitive record of changes in atmospheric deposition. This sensitivity is<br />
revealed by the difference between the background fluxes which are as low as 0.3 to 0.5<br />
:g/m 2 /yr (AD 550 to 975) and the maximum flux of 164 :g/m 2 /yr (AD 1953). In sediment<br />
records, these extreme values are masked by the continuous input of Hg from non-atmospheric<br />
sources. In fact, peat bogs are probably the most sensitive continental archives of atmospheric<br />
Pb and Hg deposition, and may serve as archives of many of other trace elements of<br />
30
contemporary environmental interest.<br />
Implications for the global atmospheric Hg cycle<br />
A model of the global atmospheric Hg cycle has recently been published (Lamborg<br />
et al., 2002) in which an annual pre-industrial annual flux of Hg to the continents of 4 Mmoles<br />
was reported. If this value is taken to represent the continental land mass (total 147 x 10 6 km 2 ),<br />
then an average, pre-industrial flux of 5.5 :g/m 2 /yr is implied. For comparison, the minimum<br />
pre-industrial flux recorded by the GL core is only 0.3 :g/m 2 /yr; this is also the minimum Hg<br />
accumulation rate recorded by the Swiss peat bog (Roos-Barraclough et al., 2002). In fact, the<br />
value reported by Lamborg et al. (2002) is at the upper end of the range (0.3 to 8 :g/m 2 /yr)<br />
reported for the Swiss bog (Roos-Barraclough et al., 2002), with the uppermost Swiss values<br />
seen only during periods of volcanic activity. The modelled result is also outside of the pre-<br />
industrial range reported here for GL (0.3 to 3 :g/m 2 /yr). Given that the deeper GL peats<br />
containing elevated Hg accumulation rates are enriched in Cu, Se, and U, we assume that the<br />
lowest Hg accumulation rates (0.3 to 0.5 :g/m 2 /yr from AD 550 to 975) are representative of the<br />
pre-industrial, atmospheric Hg flux. The pre-industrial flux calculated by Lamborg et al. (2002),<br />
therefore, may be too large by as much as one order of magnitude.<br />
At this time, we cannot determine how much of the atmospheric Hg accumulation in<br />
GL may have been due to long range atmospheric transport, and how much due to local sources.<br />
Since our study began, we have learned that the U.S. military operated a secret base called<br />
“Bluie West One”, across the fjord from the sampling site, from 1941 to 1958 (the former airfield<br />
is now Narsarssuaq airport). This base is said to have housed up to 10,000 persons during its<br />
zenith, and had its own kilns for manufacturing bricks: this may help to explain the magnitude<br />
and chronology of the elevated Hg fluxes from this period. Additional studies of peat bogs from<br />
other locations should help improve our understanding of local and long-range Hg transport, and<br />
31
further improve our knowledge of pre-industrial and post-industrial Hg accumulation rates.<br />
Temporal changes in the isotopic composition of Pb in Greenland<br />
As noted earlier, Pb concentrations are far lower in the GL core compared to DK. The<br />
Pb EF calculated using the Pb and Ti concentrations failed to reveal a significant enrichment of<br />
Pb in the surface layers of the GL core (Fig. 5a). However, in the surface and near-surface peat<br />
layers at GL, the Pb is much less radiogenic in both the leachable and residual fractions (Fig. 6b),<br />
compared to deeper, older peat layers. Given that this zone dates from the past century, the shift<br />
in Pb isotope ratios probably reflects the input of anthropogenic Pb with lower 206 Pb/ 207 Pb ratios.<br />
Anthropogenic, atmospheric Pb in Greenland has previously been shown to be derived primarily<br />
by gasoline lead used in North America (Rosman et al., 1998). Alklyllead compounds in N.<br />
America were synthesized primarily using lead ores of the Mississipi Valley type deposits which<br />
are much more radiogenic ( 206 Pb/ 207 Pb ca. 1.2) compared to the ores used for gasoline lead in<br />
Europe. However, even these, relatively radiogenic leads are considerably less radiogenic than<br />
the rocks and minerals of Greenland ( 206 Pb/ 207 Pb up to 1.3 in Fig. 6b). Thus, addition to the<br />
surface peat layer at GL of Pb derived from N. American gasoline lead, could easily have caused<br />
the significant decrease in 206 Pb/ 207 Pb revealed by the peat core. The shift in 206 Pb/ 207 Pb to less<br />
radiogenic values in samples above ca. 20 cm in the GL core (Fig. 6b), therefore, most likely<br />
reflects the addition of Pb derived from the combustion of leaded gasoline in N. America. Thus,<br />
while total Pb concentrations and their ratio to Ti failed to indicate an anthropogenic impact, the<br />
Pb isotope data clearly does. Additional work is required with respect to leaching techniques<br />
such as those now being used to fractionate Pb in soils (Harlavan and Erel, 2002; Emmanuel and<br />
Erel, 2002), with the goal of improving the recovery of the atmospheric Pb component which has<br />
been supplied by anthropogenic emissions.<br />
The Pb concentrations in the leachable fraction generally exceed those of the residual<br />
32
fraction, even in the deeper peat layers dating from pre-anthropogenic times (Fig. 6b). In the<br />
deepest peat samples studied (88cm), the leached and residual fractions are isotopically different:<br />
both fractions are highly radiogenic which suggests that both sources are local. Many geological<br />
studies employing leaching techniques indicate that radiogenic Pb in minerals is more easily<br />
recovered in the “acid-leachable” fraction because Pb is found in radiation lattice defects where<br />
it is less strongly held, compared with lattice-bound Pb which was originally incorporated in U-<br />
Th-bearing minerals. In the GL samples, however, it is the residual fraction which is more<br />
radiogenic than the leachable fraction. Given that this section of the peat profile is strongly<br />
minerotrophic, the most obvious possible sources of Pb include i) physical incorporation of fine<br />
grained mineral matter by the plants which were growing at the time peat formation began (ca.<br />
3,000 14 C yr BP), and ii) chemical adsorption/complexation of dissolved Pb which had been<br />
released to the plants and basal peat by chemical weathering of the host minerals. While it may<br />
be that the former process is primarily responsible for the isotopic composition of the Pb in the<br />
more radiogenic “residual” fraction, and the latter for the less radiogenic Pb in the “leachable”<br />
fraction, there are other possibilities. For example, to some extent the “leachable” fraction is an<br />
artefact of leaching the samples for 2 hours in 2N HCl which would not only remove<br />
exchangeable Pb, but also dissolve some fine grained mineral phases hosting Pb such as micas<br />
and feldspars; some of these may ultimately have been supplied by atmospheric soil dust and<br />
would therefore be less radiogenic.<br />
The isotopic composition of Pb in the peat from GL is inherently more complicated<br />
than the DK core, as Pb is derived from both atmospheric and non-atmospheric (aquatic +<br />
terrestrial) sources. Starting again in the basal peat layer, the residual fraction was found to be<br />
significantly more radiogenic than the leachable fraction (Fig 6b). The residual fraction must<br />
reflect the isotopic composition of Pb-bearing minerals in the local rocks, and the sediments<br />
33
which are derived from them. In contrast, the leachable fraction of the peat must also include Pb<br />
supplied by atmospheric soil dust. Assuming that the residual fraction ( 206 Pb/ 207 Pb = 1.3) reflects<br />
the composition of local sediments, and that atmospheric soil dust is similar to that found in<br />
crustal rocks ( 206 Pb/ 207 Pb = ca. 1.2), a mixture of 65% of the former and 35% of the latter would<br />
account for the isotopic composition of Pb in the leachable fraction ( 206 Pb/ 207 Pb = 1.265 for the<br />
leachate fraction of the GL sample from 88cm+ as shown Table 3).<br />
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />
The similar chronology of changing Hg concentrations in the surface peat layers at GL<br />
and DK (Fig. 2) suggest that minerotrophic peatlands also may preserve a record of atmospheric<br />
Hg accumulation. Using the bomb pulse curve to accurately date the past 50 years of peat<br />
accumulation using 14 C, the GL peat profile provides a reconstruction of atmospheric Hg which<br />
is consistent with the 40 year record provided by Greenland snow (Boutron et al., 1998), and<br />
complements the records provided for this region by marine (Asmund and Nielsen, 2000) and<br />
lake sediments (Landers et al., 1998; Bindler et al., 2001). Mercury fluxes in GL peats dating<br />
from pre-industrial times were as low as 0.3 to 0.5 µg/m 2 /yr between AD 550 and 975 which<br />
provides an estimate of the “background” atmospheric Hg fluxes. The accumulation rate reached<br />
a maximum of 164 µg/m 2 /yr in AD 1953. The GL core indicates that the Hg flux has since<br />
declined but the value in 1995 (14 µg/m 2 /yr) is clearly elevated with respect to the natural range.<br />
The chronology of Hg accumulation rates recorded by the ombrotrophic peat bog in<br />
DK are similar to GL. The sample containing the greatest Hg accumulation rate is also the<br />
sample which is most enriched in anthropogenic Pb and As. The synchroneity of these<br />
enrichments suggests that the predominant source of all three elements was coal-burning, a view<br />
which is supported by the Pb isotope data. Moreover, the Pb isotope data show very clearly that<br />
the supply of anthropogenic Pb to the air went into decline well before the phase-out of unleaded<br />
34
gasoline.<br />
The ratio of modern/pre-Industrial Hg concentrations between the two sites (59x in DK<br />
versus 15x in GL) is only a factor of four, compared to the differences between Pb and As EF<br />
(approximately 60 to 80 x). The similar rates of atmospheric Hg accumulation in southern<br />
Greenland and Denmark show that atmospheric dispersion of Hg released by human activities<br />
is fundamentally different to that of As and Pb: Hg is primarily transported as Hg o in the gas<br />
phase with a residence time of one to two years, whereas Pb and and As are transported mainly<br />
as aerosols with a residence time of ca. one week (Hutchinson and Meema, 1987); this supports<br />
the prediction (Morel et al., 1998) that the chronology of atmospheric Hg contamination in rural<br />
and remote areas should be largely comparable because of long range, vapour phase transport<br />
of Hg.<br />
35
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
We are grateful to A.K. Cheburkin for all of the XRF analyses, W.O. van der Knaap for<br />
identifying plant macrofossils, W. Rom for help with the atmospheric bomb pulse curve, and S.<br />
Reese for the 14 C age dates obtained by decay counting of the basal peat layers. Thanks also to<br />
C. Ihrig for supplementary measurements of bulk density and to G. LeRoux and N. Givelet for<br />
helpful suggestions which have led to considerable improvement in our peat sample handling<br />
and preparation protocol. For fruitful discussions, W.S. thanks A. Martinez-Cortizas, N. Givelet,<br />
and G. LeRoux; thanks also to H.L. Nielsen, the reviewers, and M. Novak for comments which<br />
helped to considerably improve the manuscript. This investigation was supported by the Swiss<br />
National Science Foundation (to W.S. at the University of Berne) and the Danish Cooperation<br />
for Environment in the Arctic (DANCEA) to M.E.G. Additional support was provided by GKSS,<br />
Germany (thanks to H. von Storch), and the Carlsberg Foundation (to C. Lohse). M.E.G. wishes<br />
to acknowledge the advice, guidance, and support of C. Lohse and T.S. Hansen for helping to<br />
launch the project, the expert technical assistance of T. Nørnberg and P.B. Hansen, and B.<br />
Odgaard and B. Aaby for helpful discussions about Danish bogs. M. E. G. was subsequently<br />
supported by the Danish Research Agency and The Department of Atmospheric Environment<br />
of Denmark (NERI) with a PhD fellowship at the Copenhagen Global Change Initiative<br />
(<strong>COGCI</strong>), University of Copenhagen (special thanks to Ole John Nielsen, Henrik Skov and Steve<br />
E. Lindberg for their supervision and guidance). Thanks also to the Danish Polar Centre,<br />
Greenland Homerule, Director of Environment, Greenland Office of Tourism, Greenland<br />
National Museum and Archive, and the Municipality and inhabitants of Narsaq. Finally, special<br />
thanks to B.E. Haas for improving the English, and the usual message from W.S..<br />
36
REFERENCES<br />
Aaby, B. and Jacobsen, J. (1979) Changes in biotic conditions and metal deposition in the last millenium as<br />
reflected in ombrotrophic peat in Draved Mose, Denmark. Danm. geol. Unders., Årbog 1978,<br />
5-43.<br />
AMAP (1998) AMAP Assessment Report: Arctic Pollution Issues. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment<br />
Programme (AMAP), Oslo, Norway. xii + 859 pp.<br />
Andersen, T. (1997) Age and petrogenesis of the Qassiarsuk carbonatite-alkaline silicate volcanic complex<br />
in the Gardar rift, South Greenland. Mineralogical Magazine 61:499-513.<br />
Armour-Brown, A.; Steenfelt, A.; Kunzendorf, H.(1983) Uranium districts defined by reconnaissance<br />
geochemistry in South Greenland. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 19:127-45.<br />
Asbirk, S. Bertelsen, U., Engelbøøl, S.E. & Lorenzen, H.P. 1973. En naturhistorisk undersøgelse af<br />
høøjmoserne Holmegaards Mose, Storelung og Skidendam. -Meddelelser om danske<br />
naturlokaliteter nr. 6 (Udgivet af foreningne Natur og Ungdom), København, 122 s.<br />
Asmund, G. and Nielsen, S.P. (2000) Mercury in dated Greenland marine sediments. Science of the Total<br />
Environment 245:61-72.<br />
Benoit, J.M., Fitzgerald, W.F., and Damman, A.W.H. (1998) The biogeochemistry of an ombrotrophic bog:<br />
evaluation of use as an archive of atmospheric mercury deposition. Environmental Research,<br />
Section A 78:118-133.<br />
Biester, H., Kilian, R., Hertel, C., Woda, C., Mangini, A, Schöler, H.F. (2002): Elevated Mercury<br />
Concentrations in Peat Bogs of South Patagonia, Chile – An Anthropogenic Signal. Earth and<br />
Planetary Science Letters 201:609-620.<br />
Biester, H., Martinez-Cortizas, A., Birkenstock, S., Kilian, R. (2003). Historic Mercury Records in Peat<br />
Bogs. The Role of Peat Decomposition, and Mass Losses. Environmental Science and<br />
Technology 37:32-39.<br />
37
Bindler, R. (2003) Estimating the natural background atmospheric deposition rate of mercury utilizing<br />
ombrotrophic bogs in south Sweden. Environmental Science and Technology 37: 40-46.<br />
Bindler, R., Renberg, I., Appleby, P.G., Anderson, N.J., and Rose, N.L. (2001) Mercury accumulation rates<br />
and spatial patterns in lake sediments from West Greenland: a coast to ice margin transect.<br />
Environmental Science and Technology 35:1736-1741.<br />
Bollhöfer, A. and Rosman, K.J.R. (2001) Isotopic signatures for atmospheric lead: The Northern Hemisphere.<br />
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65:1727-1740.<br />
Bouska, V. 1981. The Geochemistry of Coal. Elsevier, Amsterdam.<br />
Boutron, C.F., Vandal., V.M., Fitzgerald, W.F., and Ferrari, C.P. (1998) A forty year record of mercury in<br />
central Greenland snow. Geophyical Research Letters 25:3315-3318.<br />
Boyarkina, A.P., Vasil`ev, N.V., Glukhov, G.G., Rezchikov, V.I., and Tyulyupo, E.B. (1980) Gold and<br />
mercury levels in Sphagnum peats. Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V. V. Dokuchaeva. 24:24-5<br />
Braune, B., et al. (1999) Spatial and temporal trends of contaminants in Canadian Arctic freshwater and<br />
terrestrial ecosystems: a review. Science of the Total Environment 230:145-207.<br />
Bränvall, M.L., Bindler, R., Emteryd, O., Nilsson, M., and Renberg, I. (1997) Stable isotope and<br />
concentration records of atmospheric lead pollution in peat and lake sediments in Sweden. Water<br />
Air Soil Pollution 100:243-252.<br />
Christensen, J. H., M.. E. Goodsite, N. Z. Heidam, H. Skov and P. Wåhlin (2002): Atmospheric Environment.<br />
Chapter 1. In: Riget, F., J. Christensen & P. Johansen (eds). AMAP Greenland Environment<br />
(1997-2001). Ministry of Environment, Denmark Department of Atmospheric Environment,<br />
National Environmental Research Institute of Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, Box 358, DK-<br />
4000 Roskilde, Denmark<br />
Clymo, R.S. (1987) The ecology of peatlands. Science Progress (Oxford) 71:593-614.<br />
Ebinghaus, R.. Tripathi, R.M., Wallschlager, D., and Lindberg, S.E. (1999) Natural and anthropogenic<br />
38
mercury sources and their impact on the air-surface exchange of mercury on regional and global<br />
scales, in: R. Ebinghaus, R.R. Turner, D. Lacerda, O. Vasiliev, W. Salomons (eds.), Mercury<br />
Contaminated Sites, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, 1999.<br />
Emmanuel, S. and Erel, Y. (2002) Implications from concentrations and isotopic data for Pb partitioning<br />
processes in soils. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66:2517-2527.<br />
Farmer, J.G., Eades, L.J., and Graham, M.C. (1999) The lead content and isotopic composition of British<br />
coals and their implications for past and present releases of lead to the U.K. environment.<br />
Environmental Geochemistry and Health 21:257-272.<br />
Farmer, J.G., Mackenzie, A.B., Sugden, C.L., Edgar, P.J. and Eades, L.J. (1997) A comparison of the<br />
historical lead pollution records in peat and freshwaer lake sediments from central Scotland.<br />
Water Air Soil Pollution 100:253-270.<br />
Flament, P, Bertho, M.-L., Deboudt, K., Veron, A. and Puskaric, E. (2002) European isotopic signatures for<br />
lead in atmospheric aerosols: a source apportionment based upon 206 Pb/ 207 Pb ratios. Science of<br />
the Total Environment 296:35-57.<br />
Fitzgerald, W.F. and Clarkson, T.W. (1991) Mercury and methylmercury: present and future concerns.<br />
Environmental Health Perspectives 96:159-166.<br />
Fitzgerald, W.F., Engstrom, D.R., Mason, R.P., and Nater, E.A. (1997) The case for atmospheric mercury<br />
contamination in remote areas. Environmental Science and Technology 32:1-7.<br />
Frei, R., Villa, I.M., Nägler, Th.F., Kramers, J.D., Przybylowicz, W.J., Prozesky, V.M., Hofmann, B.A., and<br />
Kamber, B.S., 1997, Single mineral dating by the Pb-Pb step-leaching method, assessing the<br />
mechanism. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 61:393-414.<br />
Gobeil, C., Macdonald, R.W., and Smith, J.N. (1999) Mercury profiles in sediments of the Arctic Ocean<br />
basins. Environmental Science and Technology 33:4194-4198.<br />
Goodsite, M.E. (2000) Heavy metal deposition determined by correlation with 14C . M.Sc. thesis, University<br />
39
of Southern Denmark.<br />
Goodsite, M.E., Heinemeier, J., Rom, W., Lange, T., Ooi, S., Appleby, P.G., Shotyk, W., van der Knaap,<br />
W.O., Lohse, C. and Hansen, T.S. (2002) High resolution AMS 14 C dating of post bomb peat<br />
archives of atmospheric pollutants. Radiocarbon 43(2B):495-515.<br />
Hagner, C. (2000). European regulations to reduce lead emissions from automobiles - did they have an<br />
economic impact on the German gasoline and automobile markets?. Regional Environmental<br />
Change 1:135-151.<br />
Harlavan, Y. and Erel, Y. (2002) The release of Pb and REE from granitoids by the dissolution of accessory<br />
phases. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66:837-848.<br />
Hutchinson, T.C. and Meema, K.M. (eds.) 1987. Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, and Arsenic in the Environment.<br />
SCOPE 31. John Wiley and Sons, New York.<br />
Jensen, F.P. and Fenger, J. (1994) The air quality in Danish urban areas. Environmental Health Perspectives<br />
102:55-60.<br />
Jensen, A. and Jensen, A. (1991) Historical rates of mercury in Scandinavia estimated by dating and<br />
measurement of mercury in cores of peat bogs. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 56:769-777.<br />
Kempter, H., Görres, M. and Frenzel, B. (1997) Ti and Pb concentrations in rainwater-fed bogs in Europe as<br />
indicators of past anthropogenic activities. Water Air Soil Pollution 100:367-377.<br />
Kempter, H. and Frenzel, B. (1999) The local nature of anthropogenic emission sources on the elemental<br />
content of nearby ombrotrophic peat bogs, Vulkaneifel, Germany. Science of the Total<br />
Environment 241:117-128.<br />
Kempter, H. and Frenzel, B. (2000) The impact of early mining and smelting on the local tropospheric<br />
aerosol detected in ombrotrophic peat bogs in the Harz, Germany. Water Air, Soil Pollution<br />
121:93-108.<br />
Kober, B. & Wessels, M. & Bollhöfer, A. & Mangini, A. (1999) Pb isotopes in sediments of Lake Constance,<br />
40
Central Europe constrain the heavy metal pathways and the pollution history of the catchment,<br />
the lake and the regional atmosphere. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 63:1293-1303.<br />
Kramers, J.D. and Tolstikhin, I.D. (1997) Two terrestrial lead isotope paradoxes, forward transport<br />
modelling, core formation, and the history of the continental crust. Chemical Geology 139: 75-<br />
110.<br />
Lamborg, C.H., Fitzgerald, W.F., O`Donnell, J., and Torgersen, T. (2002) A non-steady state compartmental<br />
model of global-scale mercury biogeochemistry with interhemispheric atmospheric gradients.<br />
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66:1105-1118.<br />
Landers, D.H., Gubala, C., Verta, M., Lucotte, M., Johansson, K., Vlasova, T., and Lockhart, W.L. (1998)<br />
Using lake sediment mercury flux ratios to evalute the regional and continental dimensions of<br />
mercury deposition in Arctic and Boreal ecosystems. Atmospheric Environment 32:919-928.<br />
Lin, C-J. and Pehkonen, S.O. (1999) The chemistry of atmospheric mercury: a review. Atmospheric<br />
Environment 33:2067-2079.<br />
Lindberg, S., P.M. Stokes, E. Goldberg, and C. Wren (1987). Group Report: Mercury In T.C. Hutchinson and<br />
K.M. Meema (eds). Lead, Mercury, Cadmium, and Arsenic in the Environment, pp. 17-33. John<br />
Wiley and Sons, New York.<br />
Lodenius, M., Seppänen, A. and Uusi-Rauva, A. (1983) Sorption and mobilization of mercury in peat soil.<br />
Chemosphere 12:1575-1581.<br />
Martinez-Cortizas, A., Pontevedra Pomba, X., Novoa Munoz, J.C. and Garcia-Rodeja, E. (1997) Four<br />
thousand years of atmospheric Pb, Cd, and Zn deposition recorded by the ombrotrophic peat bog<br />
of Penido Vello (northwestern Spain) Water Air Soil Pollution 100:387-403.<br />
Martinez-Cortizas, A.M., Ponteedra Pomba, X., Garcia-Rodeja, E., Novoa Munoz, J.C. and W. Shotyk (1999)<br />
Mercury in a Spanish peat bog: archive of climate change and atmospheric metal deposition.<br />
Science 284:939-942.<br />
41
MacKenzie AB, Farmer JG, Sugden CL. (1997) Isotopic evidence of the relative retention and mobility of<br />
lead and radiocaesium in Scottish ombrotrophic peats. Science of the Total Environment<br />
203:115-127.<br />
MacKenzie AB, Logan EM, Cook GT, Pulford ID. (1998) Distributions, inventories, and isotopic<br />
composition of lead in 210 Pb-dated peat cores from contrasting biogeochemical environments:<br />
Implications for lead mobility. Science of the Total Environment 223:25-35.<br />
Monna, F., Lancelot, J., Croudace, I.W., Cundy, A.B. and Lewis, J.T. (1997) Pb isotopic composition of<br />
airborne particulate material from France and the southern United Kingdom: Implications for Pb<br />
pollution sources in urban areas. Environmental Science and Technology 31:2277-2286.<br />
Morel, F.M.M., Kraepiel, A.M.L., and Amyot, M. (1998) The cycle and bioaccumulation of mercury. Annual<br />
Reviews of Ecological Systems 29:543-566.<br />
Naucke, W., Heathwaite, A.L., Eggelsmann, R. and Schuch, M. (1993). Mire chemistry. In Mires. Process,<br />
Exploitation, and Conservation (K. Göttlich, editor and J. Cooke, translator). John Wiley and<br />
Sons, New York, 1993.<br />
Norton, S.A., <strong>Evan</strong>s, G.C. and Kahl, J.S. (1997) Comparison of Hg and Pb fluxes to hummocks and hollows<br />
of ombrotrophic Big Heath Bog and to nearby Sargent Mt. Pond, Maine, USA. Water Air Soil<br />
Pollution 100:271-286.<br />
Novak M., Emmanuel S., Vile M. A., Erel Y., Veron A., Paces T., Wieder R.K., Vanecek M., Stepanova M.,<br />
Brizova E., Hovorka J. (2003). Origin of lead in eight Central European Peat Bogs determined<br />
from isotope ratios, strengths and operation times of regional pollution sources. Environmental<br />
Science and Technology 37: 437-445.<br />
Oechsle, D. (1982) Untersuchungen zur Mobilität von Quecksilber-Spezies in Hochmooren und<br />
Möglichkeiten zu ihrer analytische Trennung and Bestimmung. Ph.D.Thesis, Universität<br />
Stuttgart.<br />
42
Pheiffer-Madsen, P. (1981) Peat bog records of atmospheric mercury deposition.Nature 293:127-129.<br />
Puxbaum, H. (1991). Metal compounds in the atmosphere In E. Merian (ed). Metals and their Compounds<br />
in the Environment. VCH, Weinheim, pp. 257-286.<br />
Rasmussen, P.E. (1994) Current methods of estimating atmospheric mercury fluxes in remote areas.<br />
Environmental Science and Technology 28:2233-2241.<br />
Reuer M. K. and Weiss D. J. (2002) Anthropogenic lead dynamics in the terrestrial and marine environment.<br />
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 360, 2889-2904.<br />
Roos-Barraclough, F. and Shotyk, W. (2003) Millennial-scale records of atmospheric mercury deposition<br />
obtained from ombrotrophic and minerotrophic peat from the Swiss Jura Mountains.<br />
Environmental Science and Technology 37(2):235-244.<br />
Roos-Barraclough, F., Martinez-Cortizas, A., Garcia-Rodeja, E., and Shotyk, W. (2002). A 14,500 year<br />
record of the accumulation of atmospheric mercury in peat: volcanic signals, anthropogenic<br />
influences, and a correlation to bromine accumulation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters<br />
202(2):435-451.<br />
Roos-Barraclough, F., Biester, H.F., Goodsite, M.E., Martinez-Cortizas, A.. and Shotyk, W. (2002)<br />
Analytical protocol for measuring total Hg concentrations in peat cores. Science of the Total<br />
Environment 292:129-139.<br />
Rosman, K.J.R., Chisholm, W., Boutron, C.F., Candelone, J.P., Jaffrezo, J.-L., and Davidson, C.I. (1998)<br />
Seasonal variations in the origin on lead in snow at Dye 3, Greenland. EPSL 160, 383-389.<br />
Salvato, N. and Pirola, C. (1996) Analysis of mercury traces by means of solid sample atomic absorption<br />
spectrometry. Mikrochimica Acta 123:63-71.<br />
Schaller, M., Steiner, O., Studer, I., Frei, R., and Kramers, J.D., (1997) Pb stepwise leaching (PbSL) dating<br />
of garnet - addressing the inclusion problem. Schweizerische Mineralogische Petrographische<br />
Mitteilungen, v.77, p.113-121<br />
43
Schroeder, W.H. and Munthe, J. (1998) Atmospheric mercury - an overview. Atmospheric Environment<br />
32:809-822.<br />
Shotyk, W. (1988) Review of the inorganic geochemistry of peats and peatland waters. Earth-Science<br />
Reviews 25(2):95-176.<br />
Shotyk, W. (2002). The chronology of anthropogenic, atmospheric Pb deposition recorded by peat cores in<br />
3 minerotrophic peat deposits from Switzerland. Science of the Total Environment 292:19-31<br />
Shotyk, W., Nesbitt, H.W., and Fyfe, W.S. (1992) Natural and anthropogenic enrichments of trace metals in<br />
peat profiles. International Journal of Coal Geology 20:49-84.<br />
Shotyk, W., Weiss, D., Appleby, P.G., Cheburkin, A.K., Frei, R., Gloor, M., Kramers, J.D., Reese, S., and<br />
van der Knaap, W.O. (1998). History of atmospheric lead deposition since 12,370 14 C yr BP<br />
recorded in a peat bog profile, Jura Mountains, Switzerland. Science 281:1635-1640.<br />
Shotyk, W., Blaser, P., Grünig, A., and Cheburkin, A.K. (2000). A new approach for quantifying cumulative,<br />
anthropogenic, atmospheric lead deposition using peat cores from bogs: Pb in eight Swiss peat<br />
bog profiles. Science of the Total Environment 249:257-280.<br />
Shotyk, W., Weiss, D., Kramers, J.D., Frei, R., Cheburkin, A.K., Gloor, M. and Reese, S. (2001)<br />
Geochemistry of the peat bog at Etang de la Gruère, Jura Mountains, Switzerland, and its record<br />
of atmospheric Pb and lithogenic trace elements (Sc, Ti, Y, Zr, Hf and REE) since 12,370 14 C<br />
yr BP. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65(14) 2337-2360.<br />
Shotyk, W., Weiss, D., Heisterkamp, M., Cheburkin, A.K., and Adams, F.C. (2003) A new peat bog record<br />
of atmospheric lead pollution in Switzerland: Pb concentrations, enrichment factors, isotopic<br />
composition, and organolead species Environmental Science and Technology 37(2):235-244..<br />
Shotyk, W., Krachler, M., Martinez-Cortizas, A., Cheburkin, A.K., and Emons, H. (2002b) A peat bog record<br />
of natural, pre-anthropogenic enrichments of trace elements in atmospheric aerosols since 12,370<br />
14 C yr BP, and their variation with Holocene climate change. Earth and Planetary Science<br />
44
Letters 199:21-37.<br />
Steinmann, P. and Shotyk, W. (1997) The pH, redox chemistry, and speciation of Fe and S in pore waters<br />
from two contrasting Sphagnum bogs, Jura Mountains, Switzerland. Geochimica et<br />
Cosmochimica Acta 61(6):1143-1163.<br />
Swaine, D.J. Trace Elements in Coal. Butterworth, London, 1990.<br />
Todt, W., Cliff, R.A., Hanser, A., Hofmann, A.W., 1993. Re-calibration of NBS lead standards using a<br />
202 Pb+ 205 Pb double spike. Terra Abstracts 5, Suppl. 1, 396.<br />
Valkovic, V. Trace Elements in Coal. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1983 (2 Vols.).<br />
Vile, M.A., Novak, M.J., Brizova, E., Wieder, R.K., and Schell, W.R. (1995) Historical rates of atmospheric<br />
Pb deposition using 210 Pb dated peat cores: corroboration, computation, and interpretation.<br />
Water, Air, Soil Pollution 79:89-106.<br />
Vile MA, Wieder RK, Novak M. (1999) Mobility of Pb in Sphagnum-derived peat. Biogeochemistry 45:35-<br />
52.<br />
Wardenaar, E.C.P. (1987). A new hand tool for cutting peat profiles. Canadian Journal of Botany 65:1772-<br />
1773.<br />
Wedepohl, K.H. (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta<br />
59:1217-1232.<br />
Weiss, D., Shotyk, W., Appleby, P.G., Cheburkin, A.K., and Kramers, J.D. (1999a). Atmospheric Pb<br />
deposition since the Industrial Revolution recorded by five Swiss peat profiles: enrichment<br />
factors, fluxes, isotopic compositon, and sources Environmental Science and Technology<br />
33:1340-1352.<br />
Weiss, D., Shotyk, W., Gloor, M. and Kramers, J.D. (1999b). Herbarium specimens of Sphagnum moss as<br />
archives of recent and past atmospheric Pb deposition in Switzerland: isotopic composition and<br />
source assessment Atmospheric Environment 33:3751-3763.<br />
45
Table 1. AMS 14 C dating of plant macrofossils from the peat core (GL2B) from Tasiusaq,<br />
Greenland.<br />
Lab nr<br />
AAR-<br />
Average<br />
depth<br />
(cm)<br />
δ 13 C<br />
(‰)<br />
Conv. 14 C age<br />
(BP)<br />
14 C content<br />
(pMC)<br />
Calibrated age 1 )<br />
5620 0.5 -26.2 -840 ± 40 110.99 ± 0.57 1957;1996-1999<br />
5621 0.0 -28.3 -900 ± 45 111.88 ± 0.62 1957;1994-1999<br />
5622 -0.5 -26.8 -1075 ± 40 114.34 ± 0.57 1957-1958;1991-1994<br />
6861 -1.5 -26.55 -1180 ± 40 115.84 ± 0.58 1958;1989-1992<br />
6899 -2.5 -26.62 -1090 ± 30 114.54 ± 0.41 1957-1958;1991-1993<br />
6862 -3.5 -26.05 -2150 ± 35 130.65 ± 0.54 1962;1978-1979<br />
5623 -5.5 -26.3 -2720 ± 35 140.33 ± 0.61 1962;1973-1974<br />
5624 -7.5 -25.8 -2880 ± 40 143.13 ± 0.69 1962;1973<br />
5625 -9.5 -25.9 -3890 ± 35 162.32 ± 0.72 1963;1967<br />
5626 -12.5 -27.6 -4685 ± 35 179.13 ± 0.83 1963-1965<br />
5627 -14.5 -26.7 -1895 ± 35 126.62 ± 0.59 1961-1962;1980-1981<br />
5628 -16.5 -27.2 -1535 ± 35 121.07 ± 0.54 1958-1961<br />
5629 -18.5 -27.1 -200 ± 40 102.52 ± 0.54 1956<br />
6900 -26.5 -24.59 65 ± 40 99.18 ± 0.51 AD: 1700-1720; 1810-1830;<br />
1880-1920; 1950-55<br />
6901 -29.5 -25.29 130 ± 40 98.38 ± 0.52 AD: 1670-1760; 1800-1890;<br />
1910-1950<br />
6620 -36.5 -33.3 1095 ± 45 87.24 ± 0.51 AD: 890-1000<br />
6621 -54.5 -23.6 1115 ± 45 87.04 ± 0.50 AD: 890-985<br />
6622 -74.5 -26.6 2485 ± 45 73.39 ± 0.41 BC: 770-520<br />
6623 -80.5 -26.6 2845 ± 50 70.19 ± 0.42 BC: 1110-1100; 1080-920<br />
5630 -87.5 -26.7 2920 ± 50 69.52 ± 0.44 BC: 1210-1010<br />
1 ) Calibrated age ranges corresponding to 95% confidence interval for depths 0-18.5 cm, and<br />
68% confidence interval for depths 26.5-87.5 cm.
Table 2. AMS 14 C dating of plant macrofossils from the peat core (DK1B) from Storelung<br />
mose, Denmark.<br />
Lab nr<br />
AAR-<br />
Average<br />
depth<br />
(cm)<br />
δ 13 C<br />
(‰)<br />
Conv. 14 C<br />
age (yrs BP)<br />
14 C content<br />
(pMC)<br />
Calibrated age 1 )<br />
5611 0.0 -27.5 -865 ± 40 111.36 ± 0.54 1957;1995-1999<br />
5612 -0.5 -26.1 -860 ± 45 111.31 ± 0.61 1957;1995-1999<br />
5613 -2.5 -26.8 -1180 ± 45 115.84 ± 0.65 1958; 1989-1992<br />
6855 -3.5 -26.88 -1830 ± 35 125.62 ± 0.53 1961; 1980-1982<br />
6856 -4.5 -26.25 -2210 ± 40 131.65 ± 0.65 1962; 1978-1979<br />
6857 -5.5 -24.92 -2520 ± 45 136.88 ± 0.75 1962; 1975-1976<br />
6858 -6.5 -23.93 -2785 ± 40 141.44 ± 0.70 1962; 1973-1974<br />
6859 -7.5 -23.24 -3465 ± 35 153.92 ± 0.69 1963; 1970<br />
5614 -8.5 -24.3 -3400 ± 40 152.68 ± 0.76 1963; 1970-1971<br />
6860 -9.5 -22.78 -4580 ± 30 176.82 ± 0.68 1963-1965<br />
6612 -10.5 -23.0 -2529 ± 43 136.99 ± 0.74 1962; 1975-1976<br />
6613 -11.5 -24.0 -1707 ± 42 123.68 ± 0.65 1959-1961; 1982-1984<br />
6614 -12.5 -23.6 -1926 ± 42 127.09 ± 0.67 1962; 1980-1981<br />
6615 -13.5 -24.3 -746 ± 47 109.74 ± 0.65 1957; 1995-1999<br />
5615 -14.5 -24.7 -1480 ± 35 120.19 ± 0.55 1958; 1960; 1984-1987<br />
5616 -15.5 -25.7 -1505 ± 35 120.58 ± 0.56 1958-1961; 1984-1987<br />
5617 -16.5 -27.0 -10 ± 45 100.12 ± 0.53 AD: 1693-1726; 1813-1850;<br />
1862-1918; 1951-1956<br />
5618 -18.5 -24.2 45 ± 40 99.43 ± 0.49 AD: 1895-1905; 1951-55<br />
6898 -19.5 -25.34 160 ± 40 98.00 ± 0.49 AD: 1660-1700; 1720-1820;<br />
1850-1870; 1910-1950<br />
6616-1 -28.5 -26.7 2395 ± 45 74.20 ± 0.43 BC: 760-720; 540-390<br />
6616-2 -28.5 -27.5 380 ± 45 95.41 ± 0.55 AD: 1440-1520; 1590-1630<br />
6617-1 -34.5 -25 3225 ± 50 66.94 ± 0.42 BC: 1600-1590; 1530-1430<br />
6617-2 -34.5 -28.7 2720 ± 45 71.29 ± 0.41 BC: 905-820<br />
6618 -46.5 -26.7 2935 ± 50 69.40 ± 0.43 BC: 1260-1240; 1220-1040<br />
6619 -68.5 -26.5 2970 ± 50 69.11 ± 0.45 BC: 1300-1080; 1060-1050<br />
5619 -78.5 -24.5 3050 ± 45 68.39 ± 0.38 BC: 1390-1260; 1230-1220<br />
1 ) Calibrated age ranges corresponding to 95% confidence interval for depths 0-16.5 cm, and<br />
68% confidence interval for depths 18.5-78.5 cm.
Table 3. Pb isotope data of leachates and residues from DK and GL peatlands<br />
sample depth phase acid* time Pb 206Pb/204Pb ± 2s+ 207Pb/204Pb ± 2s+ 208Pb/204Pb ± 2s+ 206Pb/207Pb ± 2s+ 208Pb/206Pb ± 2s+ 208Pb/207Pb r1** r2††<br />
(ppm)<br />
DK 1B 0+, L, IC 0 leachate 2N HCl 1h 8,28 17,872 0,092 15,508 0,081 37,549 0,196 1,1525 0,0006 2,1010 0,0012 2,4213 0,992 0,994<br />
DK 1B 1-2, L, IC 2 leachate 2N HCl 1h 24,24 17,726 0,025 15,562 0,023 37,528 0,057 1,1390 0,0003 2,1172 0,0008 2,4116 0,979 0,968<br />
DK 1B 4-5, L, IC 5 leachate 2N HCl 1h 32,48 17,683 0,021 15,553 0,020 37,485 0,050 1,1370 0,0003 2,1198 0,0008 2,4102 0,969 0,961<br />
DK 1B 7-8, L, IC 8 leachate 2N HCl 1h 49,91 17,762 0,024 15,548 0,022 37,566 0,055 1,1424 0,0002 2,1149 0,0008 2,4161 0,980 0,970<br />
DK 1B 12-13, L, IC 13 leachate 2N HCl 1h 113,79 17,910 0,021 15,561 0,019 37,725 0,049 1,1509 0,0002 2,1063 0,0008 2,4243 0,976 0,961<br />
DK 1B 15-16, L, IC 16 leachate 2N HCl 1h 141,41 17,866 0,022 15,562 0,020 37,714 0,051 1,1481 0,0002 2,1109 0,0008 2,4235 0,978 0,962<br />
DK 1B 18-19, L, IC 19 leachate 2N HCl 1h 84,08 17,928 0,021 15,557 0,019 37,773 0,049 1,1524 0,0002 2,1070 0,0008 2,4280 0,974 0,958<br />
DK 1B 30-31, L, IC 31 leachate 2N HCl 1h 2,38 18,396 0,053 15,608 0,046 38,285 0,113 1,1786 0,0004 2,0812 0,0009 2,4529 0,990 0,989<br />
DK 1B 40-41, L, IC 41 leachate 2N HCl 1h 16,55 18,365 0,025 15,600 0,022 38,288 0,056 1,1773 0,0003 2,0848 0,0008 2,4544 0,977 0,968<br />
DK 1B 48-49, L, IC 49 leachate 2N HCl 1h 14,38 18,112 0,039 15,436 0,034 37,823 0,084 1,1734 0,0003 2,0883 0,0010 2,4504 0,986 0,978<br />
DK 1B 78-79, L, IC 79 leachate 2N HCl 1h 17,639 0,063 15,128 0,055 36,952 0,135 1,1660 0,0004 2,0949 0,0009 2,4427 0,993 0,993<br />
DK 1B 0+, R, IC 0 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 1,27 17,241 0,168 14,892 0,146 36,125 0,354 1,1577 0,0008 2,0953 0,0019 2,4257 0,996 0,996<br />
DK 1B 1-2, R, IC 2 residue 8N HBr - HF1h 10,19 17,787 0,022 15,560 0,022 37,566 0,053 1,1432 0,0005 2,1120 0,0011 2,4143 0,923 0,935<br />
DK 1B 4-5, R, IC 5 residue 8N HBr - HF1h 6,02 17,744 0,019 15,554 0,018 37,530 0,046 1,1408 0,0002 2,1151 0,0008 2,4129 0,977 0,958<br />
DK 1B 7-8, R, IC 8 residue 8N HBr - HF1h 14,32 17,795 0,016 15,555 0,015 37,596 0,040 1,1440 0,0002 2,1128 0,0008 2,4171 0,968 0,946<br />
DK 1B 12-13, R, IC 13 residue 8N HBr - HF1h 28,8 17,937 0,033 15,566 0,029 37,781 0,073 1,1523 0,0003 2,1063 0,0009 2,4272 0,979 0,976<br />
DK 1B 15-16, R, IC 16 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 32,08 17,897 0,012 15,556 0,013 37,732 0,036 1,1505 0,0002 2,1083 0,0010 2,4255 0,947 0,886<br />
DK 1B 18-19, R, IC 19 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 15,33 17,979 0,024 15,570 0,022 37,868 0,055 1,1547 0,0003 2,1063 0,0008 2,4321 0,975 0,970<br />
DK 1B 30-31, R, IC 31 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 1,15 18,361 0,035 15,588 0,031 38,184 0,077 1,1779 0,0003 2,0796 0,0010 2,4497 0,982 0,972<br />
DK 1B 40-41, R, IC 41 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 5 18,396 0,037 15,602 0,033 38,311 0,081 1,1791 0,0003 2,0826 0,0009 2,4556 0,986 0,980<br />
DK 1B 48-49, R, IC 49 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 2,01 18,043 0,098 15,333 0,083 37,638 0,205 1,1768 0,0004 2,0860 0,0010 2,4548 0,996 0,996<br />
DK 1B 78-79, R, IC 79 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 18,023 0,066 15,464 0,057 37,743 0,140 1,1655 0,0005 2,0942 0,0011 2,4407 0,988 0,991<br />
GL 2B 0+, L, IC 0 leachate 2N HCl 1h 1,57 18,603 0,072 15,266 0,060 37,592 0,148 1,2186 0,0005 2,0208 0,0013 2,4625 0,986 0,986<br />
GL 2B 5-6, L, IC 5 leachate 2N HCl 1h 1,63 19,510 0,041 15,644 0,034 38,815 0,086 1,2472 0,0004 1,9895 0,0010 2,4812 0,971 0,972<br />
GL 2B 14-15, L, IC 15 leachate 2N HCl 1h 6,1 18,593 0,092 15,520 0,077 38,001 0,189 1,1980 0,0004 2,0438 0,0011 2,4486 0,995 0,994<br />
GL 2B 16-17, L, IC 17 leachate 2N HCl 1h 7,54 18,556 0,064 15,517 0,054 37,981 0,133 1,1958 0,0004 2,0468 0,0010 2,4477 0,990 0,990<br />
GL 2B 20-21, L, IC 21 leachate 2N HCl 1h 5,47 20,073 0,023 15,714 0,019 39,070 0,050 1,2774 0,0002 1,9464 0,0007 2,4863 0,973 0,961<br />
GL 2B 26-27, L, IC 27 leachate 2N HCl 1h 3,2 20,142 0,051 15,705 0,041 39,296 0,107 1,2825 0,0004 1,9509 0,0016 2,5021 0,976 0,952<br />
GL 2B 30-31, L, IC 31 leachate 2N HCl 1h 2,93 19,380 0,023 15,442 0,019 40,932 0,053 1,2550 0,0002 2,1122 0,0008 2,6508 0,974 0,962<br />
GL 2B 88+, L, IC 88 leachate 2N HCl 1h 7,08 19,417 0,037 15,347 0,030 38,297 0,076 1,2652 0,0003 1,9724 0,0008 2,4955 0,982 0,979<br />
GL 2B 0+, R, IC 0 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 1,25 18,816 0,088 14,992 0,071 36,424 0,173 1,2550 0,0005 1,9358 0,0011 2,4295 0,991 0,992<br />
GL 2B 5-6, R, IC 5 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 1,63 19,510 0,041 15,644 0,034 38,815 0,086 1,2472 0,0004 1,9895 0,0010 2,4812 0,971 0,972<br />
GL 2B 14-15, R, IC 15 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 1,45 19,053 0,121 15,208 0,097 36,777 0,235 1,2528 0,0006 1,9303 0,0012 2,4183 0,992 0,995<br />
GL 2B 16-17, R, IC 17 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 3,08 18,846 0,068 15,428 0,056 37,591 0,138 1,2215 0,0004 1,9946 0,0010 2,4365 0,990 0,990<br />
GL 2B 20-21, R, IC 21 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 5,66 19,388 0,059 15,565 0,048 37,105 0,115 1,2456 0,0004 1,9138 0,0009 2,3838 0,989 0,989<br />
GL 2B 26-27, R, IC 27 residue 8N HBr - HF1h 3,24 20,594 0,068 15,653 0,052 37,497 0,126 1,3157 0,0003 1,8207 0,0010 2,3956 0,992 0,988<br />
GL 2B 30-31, R, IC 31 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 1,76 19,611 0,058 15,228 0,046 37,269 0,114 1,2877 0,0004 1,9005 0,0011 2,4473 0,985 0,983<br />
GL 2B 88+, R, IC 88 residue 8N HBr - HF1d 5,01 20,038 0,051 15,419 0,040 39,894 0,105 1,2996 0,0004 1,9909 0,0011 2,5873 0,976 0,979<br />
UGS 1878-P, L, IC leachate 2N HCl 1h 74,88 17,821 0,025 15,583 0,023 37,647 0,059 1,1436 0,0003 2,1126 0,0011 2,4159 0,972 0,947<br />
UGS 1878-P, R, IC residue 8N HBr - HF1d 7,21 17,684 0,071 15,489 0,063 37,412 0,155 1,1417 0,0006 2,1156 0,0016 2,4154 0,988 0,982<br />
GL 2B 5-6, L, IC 5 leachate 2N HCl 1h 4,45 19,158 0,053 15,508 0,044 37,339 0,107 1,2354 0,0004 1,9490 0,0010 2,4078 0,983 0,982
FIGURE CAPTIONS<br />
1. Location maps of the coring sites in Greenland (GL) and Denmark (DK).<br />
2. a) Ash contents (%), dry bulk density (g/cm 3 ), gravimetric (ng/g) and volumetric<br />
(ng/cm 3 ) Hg concentrations in the GL “B” cores (cut into 1 cm slices). b) Ash contents<br />
(%), dry bulk density (g/cm 3 ), gravimetric (ng/cm 3 ) and volumetric (ng/cm3) Hg<br />
concentrations in the DK “B” cores. Selected age dates (from Tables 1 and 2) are<br />
shown for convenience.<br />
3. Age depth relationship in the GL “B” core. a) all samples. b) samples dated using the<br />
bomb pulse curve for 14 C. Age depth relationship in the DK “B” core. a) all samples.<br />
b) samples dated using the bomb pulse curve for 14 C.<br />
4. Mercury accumulation rates (µg/m 2 /yr). a) GL, all samples. b) GL (samples dated<br />
using the bomb pulse curve for 14 C. The upper solid line represents the estimated flux<br />
+ 20%, the lower line the estimated flux - 20%. c) DK samples dated using the bomb<br />
pulse curve for 14 C. The upper empty symbols represent the estimated flux + 20%, the<br />
lower hollow symbols the estimated flux - 20%.<br />
5. a) Pb and As concentrations (µg/g)in the GL and DK cores, and the Pb and As EFs<br />
calculated as described in the text. There is no measurable enrichment of Pb or As in<br />
the surface layers of the GL core. Age dates of the deepest samples from these “A”<br />
cores obtained using 14 C (decay counting, University of Berne) which yielded GL<br />
(>78cm) 3540 ± 30 14 C yr BP and DK (>84cm) 2790 ± 40 14 C yr BP (conventional<br />
radiocarbon yrs BP). b) the atmospheric fluxes of total Pb (solid symbols) and<br />
anthropogenic Pb (hollow symbols) in DK, obtained as described in the text. c) the<br />
percentage of anthropogenic Pb and its temporal evolution in DK.<br />
6. a) Pb concentrations and the isotopic composition of Pb in the exchangeable and<br />
49
esidual fractions of the “B” cores from DK. b) Pb concentrations and the isotopic<br />
composition of Pb in the exchangeable and residual fractions of the “B” cores from<br />
GL. c) “Residual” Pb measured using the extraction procedure described in the text,<br />
compared with “lithogenic Pb” calculated using either Pb/Zr = UCC, Pb/Ti = UCC,<br />
or Pb/Ti = 4x UCC. Also shown are “lithogenic” Pb and As calculated using either<br />
Pb/Ti = UCC or 4x UCC, and As/Ti = UCC or 10x UCC, in relation to the 206 Pb/ 207 Pb<br />
ratio of selected samples, and selected age dates obtained using 14 C (atmospheric<br />
bomb pulse). The small arrows point to the maximum concentration of Pb and As<br />
which was dated to AD 1954.<br />
7. Plot of 208 Pb/ 206 Pb versus 206 Pb/ 207 Pb for the leached fraction of the DK peat samples<br />
(Table 3), U.K. coal (from Farmer et al., 1999) and U.K. leaded gasoline (from Monna<br />
et al., 1997). Also shown is the isotopic composition of Pb in an Oxfordian sediment<br />
(from Shotyk et al., 1998). The direction of the arrows illustrate the temporal<br />
evolution of atmospheric Pb in DK from 1950 to 1980 (towards less radiogenic values<br />
as gasoline lead grows in importance) and from 1980 to 2000 (toward more radiogenic<br />
values as gasoline lead consumption declines).<br />
8. a) Ti (%), Zr, Y and Rb (µg/g) concentrations in the GL (green) and DK (red) “A”<br />
cores (3 cm slices. b) Ca (%), Sr, Mn (µg/g), and Fe (%) concentrations in the GL and<br />
DK “A” cores (3 cm slices).<br />
9. a) Ti (%), Zr, Y and Rb (µg/g) concentrations in the GL (green) and DK (red) “B”<br />
cores (1 cm slices) b) Ca (%), Sr, Mn (µg/g), and Fe (%) concentrations in the GL and<br />
DK “B” cores.<br />
10. a) Cu and U concentrations (µg/g), and Cu/Y and U/Y rations in the GL (green) and<br />
DK (red) “A” cores. b) Br and Se concentrations (µg/g) in the GL and DK “A” cores,<br />
50
and the Se/Br ratio.<br />
51
Depth (cm)<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
a<br />
b<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
-90<br />
0 10 20 30 40<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
Ash (%)<br />
-80<br />
0 5 10 15<br />
Ash (%)<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
-90<br />
0 0.1 0.2 0.3<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
-90<br />
0 50 100 150<br />
Bulk Density (g/cm3) Hg (ng/g)<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 100 200 300<br />
Bulk Density (g/cm3) Hg (ng/g)<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
-90<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
1973<br />
AD 948 +/- 52<br />
AD 938 +/- 48<br />
Hg (ng/cm3)<br />
1964<br />
1981<br />
1992<br />
1962<br />
-80<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Hg (ng/cm3)<br />
1956<br />
AD 1683 to AD 1928<br />
2395 +/- 45 14C yr BP<br />
3225 +/- 50 14C yr BP<br />
2935 +/- 50 14C yr BP<br />
2970 +/- 50 14C yr BP<br />
GREENLAND<br />
2485 +/- 45 14C yr BP<br />
2845 +/- 45 14C yr BP<br />
1958<br />
ca.17th to 20th C.<br />
disturbance by peat cutting<br />
DENMARK<br />
FIGURE 2
Depth (cm)<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
0<br />
25<br />
50<br />
75<br />
100<br />
0<br />
25<br />
50<br />
75<br />
100<br />
GREENLAND GREENLAND<br />
0.019 cm/yr<br />
-2000 -1000 0 1000 2000<br />
Calibrated Age (Year BC/AD) Calibrated Age (Year AD)<br />
DENMARK DENMARK<br />
-2000 -1000 0 1000 2000<br />
Calibrated Age (Year BC/AD) Calibrated Age (Year AD)<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
0.68 cm/yr<br />
0.20 cm/yr<br />
a b<br />
30<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000<br />
0.47 cm/yr<br />
0.21 cm/yr<br />
c d<br />
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000<br />
FIGURE 3
Hg accumulation rate (µg/m2/yr)<br />
1000<br />
300<br />
100<br />
30<br />
10<br />
3<br />
1<br />
0.3<br />
a<br />
GL<br />
0.1<br />
-1500 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 1500 2000<br />
Calibrated Age (Year BC/AD)<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
Hg accumulation rate (µg/m2/yr)<br />
Hg accumulation rate (µg/m2/yr)<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
100<br />
50<br />
b<br />
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />
c<br />
Calibrated Age (Year AD)<br />
0<br />
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />
Calibrated Age (Year AD)<br />
GL<br />
DK<br />
FIGURE 4
Depth (cm)<br />
a<br />
Pb flux (mg/m2/yr)<br />
b<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 100 200 300<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
Pb (µg/g)<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
LLD = 3 µg/g<br />
0 10 20 30<br />
As (µg/g)<br />
DK<br />
total<br />
anthropogenic<br />
0<br />
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />
Calibrated Age (Year AD)<br />
Anthropogenic Pb (% of total)<br />
c<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
0 20 40 60 80<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
GL<br />
Pb EF<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
DK<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
0 20 40 60 80<br />
As EF<br />
40<br />
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000<br />
Calibrated Age (Year AD)<br />
DK<br />
FIGURE 5
Depth (cm)<br />
a<br />
Pb/Zr =<br />
UCC<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
Pb/Ti =<br />
UCC<br />
c<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35<br />
Pb (µg/g)<br />
DK DK<br />
GL GL<br />
residual<br />
leached<br />
total<br />
80<br />
80<br />
0 50 100 150 200 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19<br />
Pb (µg/g)<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
Pb/Ti =<br />
4x UCC<br />
Pb<br />
isotope<br />
"residual"<br />
206Pb/207Pb<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
lithogenic<br />
anthropogenic<br />
-20<br />
0 100 200<br />
Pb (µg/g)<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
80<br />
90<br />
0 5 10 15<br />
90<br />
b Pb (µg/g)<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
lithogenic<br />
-20<br />
0 10 20 30<br />
As (µg/g)<br />
anthropogenic<br />
0 1999<br />
1994<br />
1979<br />
1970<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
0<br />
10<br />
20<br />
30<br />
40<br />
50<br />
60<br />
70<br />
80<br />
1.20 1.24 1.28 1.32<br />
206Pb/207Pb<br />
leached<br />
residual<br />
-20<br />
1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17<br />
206Pb/207Pb<br />
1959<br />
1954<br />
DENMARK<br />
FIGURE 6
208Pb/206Pb<br />
2.20<br />
2.15<br />
2.10<br />
2.05<br />
U.K leaded gasoline<br />
DK peat samples<br />
1980 to 2000<br />
1950 to 1980<br />
coal, England<br />
2.00<br />
1.04 1.06 1.08 1.10 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.18 1.20 1.22<br />
206Pb/207Pb<br />
coal, Scotland<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
sediment<br />
FIGURE 7
Depth (cm)<br />
a<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
b<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 0.1 0.2 0.3<br />
DK<br />
Ti (%)<br />
0 1 2 3 4<br />
Ca (%)<br />
GL<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
DK<br />
GL<br />
0 100 200 300<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 10 20 30<br />
Zr (µg/g) Y (µg/g)<br />
0 100 200 300 400 500<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 100 200 300<br />
Sr (µg/g) Mn (µg/g)<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
1177<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Rb (µg/g)<br />
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5<br />
Fe (%)<br />
FIGURE 8
Depth (cm)<br />
a<br />
Depth (cm)<br />
b<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
DK<br />
Ti (%)<br />
-20<br />
0 1 2 3 4<br />
Ca (%)<br />
GL<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
0 2 4 6 8 10<br />
Zr (µg/g) Y (µg/g)<br />
-20<br />
0 100 200 300<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
-20<br />
0 400 800 1200 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
Sr (µg/g) Mn (µg/g)<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
-20<br />
0 10 20 30<br />
0<br />
-5<br />
-10<br />
-15<br />
Rb (µg/g)<br />
Fe (%)<br />
FIGURE 9
Depth (cm)<br />
Depth (cm) a<br />
b<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 10 20 30 40<br />
Cu (µg/g)<br />
DK<br />
0 50 100 150 200<br />
Br (µg/g)<br />
GL<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 10 20 30 40<br />
Cu/Y<br />
0 5 10 15 20<br />
Se (µg/g)<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120<br />
U (µg/g)<br />
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5<br />
Se/Br<br />
Shotyk et al., "Atmospheric Hg, Pb, and As in peat from Greenland...", revised version, April 15, 2003<br />
0<br />
-10<br />
-20<br />
-30<br />
-40<br />
-50<br />
-60<br />
-70<br />
-80<br />
0 2 4 6 8 10 12<br />
U/Y<br />
FIGURE 10
Fate of Mercury in the Arctic<br />
Paper 9: Noernberg, T., Goodsite, M.E., Shotyk, W., An Improved Motorized Corer and Sample Processing<br />
System for Frozen Peat. In review at Arctic.
Saturday, 28 December 2002 (Revised June 19, 2003)<br />
In review at Arctic<br />
An Improved Motorized Corer and Sample Processing System for Frozen Peat<br />
TOMMY NOERNBERG 1 , MICHAEL E. GOODSITE* 2,1 and WILLIAM SHOTYK 3,4<br />
1 University of Southern Denmark, Department of Chemistry, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M,<br />
Denmark<br />
2 (previous address) National Environmental Research Institute, Department of Atmospheric<br />
Environment, Frederiksborgvej 399, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark<br />
3 Institute of Environmental Geochemistry, University of Heidelberg, <strong>IN</strong>F 236, D-69120 Heidelberg,<br />
Germany<br />
4 (previous address) Geological Institute, University of Berne, Baltzerstrasse 1, CH-3012 Berne,<br />
Switzerland<br />
*Corresponding author<br />
1
ABSTRACT. An improved corer and associated equipment for obtaining continuous samples of<br />
frozen peat are described. In addition, new machines for precise slicing of frozen peat cores and<br />
accurate sub-sampling of volumetric slices are described and illustrated.<br />
Key words: Arctic, frozen peat, coring equipment, permafrost, and tundra.<br />
2
<strong>IN</strong>TRODUCTION<br />
Recent research utilizing peat deposits in the High Arctic as archives of environmental<br />
contaminants has required a coring system to obtain continuous, undisturbed cores from deposits<br />
that are typically more than 2 m deep and are frozen below 10 - 20 cm. After examining sampling<br />
options, we decided to build our own corer, improving upon previous, unpublished designs such as<br />
the SIPRE/CRREL corer (Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment, U.S. Army Corps of<br />
Engineers which later became Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory), and a similar<br />
corer described by Hughes and Terasmae (1963) which was used extensively by the Geological<br />
Survey of Canada (GSC) in the 1960’s and 1970’s (Blake 1964, 1974, 1977; Veillette and Nixon,<br />
1980). The motorized corer described by Hughes and Terasmae was based on improvements made<br />
to a hand-operated, SIPRE-type ice corer manufactured by AB Stålsvets, Sollentuna, Sweden. The<br />
corer employed by Hughes and Terasmae in the Yukon in 1962 (Hughes and Terasmae, 1963, pp.<br />
270-272 (as cited in Blake, 1964) had teeth of tooled steel. Blake replaced these with carboloy<br />
teeth, noting excellent results (Blake, 1964). Carboloy is an alloy containing cobalt, tungsten, and<br />
carbon teeth. This alloy is harder than steel; it is commonly used to cut steel, quartz, and other<br />
materials. Its hardness is little affected by heat.<br />
Visually, the corer that we built looks similar to the Austin Kovacs Enterprises (AKE) MARK<br />
V Ice Corer. However, the AKE MARK V corer is designed for coring ice, and the materials used<br />
for constructing it (stainless steel cutting teeth, anodized aluminum cutting head, fiberglass barrel)<br />
render it unsuitable for coring frozen peat which might contain sand or other mineral particles<br />
(Austin Kovacs, personal communication). Visual inspection of the peat cores from Bathurst Island<br />
collected by Blake in 1963 revealed abundant grains of mineral material, clearly indicating the need<br />
for robust coring equipment using suitable construction materials. Because there was no<br />
commercially available corer for collecting undisturbed cores of frozen peat, we decided to design<br />
and build our own. After a prototype corer had been built, we compared it to a GSC corer as<br />
3
described in technical drawings which were kindly provided to us by W. Blake, Jr.. However, we<br />
have remained with our original design, because of the improvements described below.<br />
4<br />
The new corer (Fig. 1) is a rugged, Teflon ® coated coring system which is able to<br />
continuously core frozen peat up to 10 m deep in 70 cm long sections of 9.7 cm diameter. The<br />
complete system (minus motor and fuel) weighs 26 kg. This weight includes 10 m worth of treated<br />
aircraft aluminum extension rods which are connected with male and female locking flange ends.<br />
These locking ends transfer the torque and are secured with a locking pin, in case the flanges<br />
deform or break. There is a core recovery system as a back-up and extra cutting teeth. Thus, one<br />
person can easily carry the complete corer. The corer is powered by a 1 man 1.6 h.p. or a 2 man 4.1<br />
h.p. motor which allow a 70 cm core section to be recovered in approximately 15 minutes<br />
(including packing time).<br />
NEW CORER DESIGN AND FEATURES<br />
Our system includes a quick-release motor drive shaft to corer tube coupling system<br />
(Fig. 2) so that samples can be removed immediately, preventing them from freezing into the<br />
Teflon ® coated, stainless steel (AISI 304) coring tube. The coating helps prevent the samples or<br />
chips of peat from freezing to the tube. Moreover, the hardened (Rockwell 62) steel (Sverker ® 21)<br />
cutting teeth cut the core 5 mm smaller than the tube diameter, allowing the core to easily slide into<br />
commercial polyethylene (PE) stockings. These are sealed, labelled and placed in capped plastic<br />
tubes, whose diameter allows the cores to fit snugly; helping to protect them from deformation<br />
during shipping and storage.<br />
Our coring system also includes spring-loaded cutting blades on the inside of the<br />
cutting head (Fig. 3): these are designed to cut horizontally across the bottom of the core section<br />
when the motor is reversed. Thus, this important feature quickly and uniformly cuts off the bottom<br />
of the core section; moreover, these cutting blades support the peat core while it is recovered from<br />
the hole. Therefore, the corer provides an effectively continuous record of peat accumulation, a<br />
feature that is especially important in palaeoenvironmental studies.
In addition, the coring system includes a compact, manual, backup core recovery<br />
system, designed at the GSC (as depicted in Blake, 1978, 1982; Veillette and Nixon, 1980), which<br />
can be assembled in the field in case it is needed. The kit consists of rods and two circular plates<br />
with three grabbing teeth on the plate at the bottom, and includes a conical metal wedge, which is<br />
attached to the end of the extension rods. By sliding the wedge forcefully between the core and the<br />
borehole sidewall, the core breaks at the bottom. The wedge is removed and the extension rods are<br />
attached to the core recovery frame described above. The frame slides over the core, and is gently<br />
pulled up, catching the teeth into the core, which is then lifted to the surface. We did not experience<br />
our corer getting stuck or fouled with sediment in the coring process in the field.<br />
SAMPLE PROCESS<strong>IN</strong>G<br />
In the laboratory, a slicing and volumetric sub-sampling system was designed and<br />
constructed to facilitate uniform sectioning of the frozen core, with easy access for cleaning<br />
between slices, to reduce the risk of contamination and to allow for easy blade replacement. Our<br />
cores are usually cut into sections of 1 cm, but the saw system can be adjusted to any thickness<br />
required. Prior to developing this system, we had sliced cores with a vertical band saw, on a sliding<br />
board. Unfortunately, the band saw retains debris in the blade housing and there is a risk of cross<br />
contamination between samples. Because of the potentially large differences in contaminant<br />
concentrations between modern and ancient peat samples, the risk of contamination is a serious<br />
drawback which needs to be reduced as much as possible. To overcome this problem, a band saw<br />
was mounted horizontally on a hinge, and attached to a frame that firmly holds the core, with an<br />
adjustable backstop for the core (Fig. 4). A peat core is placed within the frame and slid to the<br />
backstop after each slice – thus providing uniform thickness slices. Because the saw blade is<br />
mounted horizontally, the debris generated during cutting will fall into the basin used to collect<br />
waste. As an extra precaution to further reduce the risk of contamination, the saw blade can be<br />
rinsed each time without removing any blade housing covers.<br />
5
6<br />
Frozen slices are sub-sampled uniformly with a hand-operated stainless steel (AISI<br />
304) press, which recovers volumetric plugs for further analysis (Fig. 5). These plugs are then used<br />
as is for measurements of physical properties such as moisture content and bulk density, and for<br />
recovering plant macrofossils for 14 C age dating. Plugs can also be dried and milled to provide a<br />
homogeneous fine powder for subsequent chemical analyses, and for 210 Pb age dating.<br />
FIELD WORK<br />
The Environmental Chemistry Research Group at the University of Southern<br />
Denmark, in collaboration with Institute for Environmental Geochemistry at the University of<br />
Heidelberg, the Danish National Environmental Research Institute, the University of Berne, and the<br />
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), are investigating long-term records of<br />
contaminants (Hg, Cd, Pb and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)) in the Arctic, using<br />
permanently frozen peat deposits as environmental archives. The sites chosen to date are on<br />
Bathurst Island, Nunavut, Canada and Nordvestø, Carey Islands, Greenland, based on previous<br />
investigations at the sites by the Geological Survey of Canada (GSC) undertaken approximately 30-<br />
40 years ago (Blake 1964, 1974, 1977,1978,1982). The verified stratigraphy, physical and<br />
palynological determinations in the peat deposits made the sites prudent candidates for the present<br />
study, as did the advice offered by Dr. Weston Blake Jr. with respect to the sites and coring<br />
experiences. The excellent field descriptions provided by Dr. Blake enabled us to return to the exact<br />
sites where he cored and actually find the still-capped boreholes left after his investigations on<br />
Nordvestø and near his site at Bracebridge Inlet. By sampling at or near the previous sites, we were<br />
able to obtain samples that provide supplementary and complementary information to those taken<br />
for the previous studies.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
Our sampling system is the result of laboratory testing prior to our Bathurst Island<br />
campaign during the summer of 2000, field-testing on Bathurst Island, subsequent improvements
and testing prior to the Carey Islands and a satisfactory field run in the Carey Islands in 2001 (Fig.<br />
6). Our coring system met or exceeded the original design goals: 1. portable - can easily be carried<br />
by an individual; 2. recovers continuous cores as long as necessary; 3. function well in the Arctic<br />
environment with all equipment amenable to service in the field, while wearing gloves, including<br />
replacement of the cutting head teeth; 4. robust - all components should be able to survive overland<br />
transport, weather extremes and the wear and tear associated with coring peat containing high<br />
concentrations of mineral matter; 5. efficient - in addition to coring peat, this corer is equally as<br />
effective in recovering ice from lenses and mineral matter (sand and silt) when present. Thus, it<br />
should find wide applications for recovering a broad range of Quaternary materials frozen in the<br />
Arctic.<br />
Further information about the coring and preparation system described here, including<br />
all technical drawings, are available without cost from the senior author (tno@chem.sdu.dk).<br />
REFERENCES<br />
BLAKE, W., Jr. 1964. Preliminary account of the glacial history of Bathurst Island, Arctic<br />
Archipelago. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 64-30, 8 pp.<br />
BLAKE, W., Jr. 1974. Periglacial features and landscape evolution, central Bathurst Island, District<br />
of Franklin. In Report of Activities, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 74-1B, 235-244.<br />
BLAKE, W, JR, 1977. Radiocarbon Age determinations from the Carey Islands, Northwest<br />
Greenland; in, Report of Activities, Part A; Geological Survey of Canada, Paper, 77-1A, 1977, 445-<br />
454.<br />
BLAKE, W., Jr. 1978. Coring of Holocene pond sediments at Cape Herschel, Ellesmere Island,<br />
Arctic Archipelago. In Current Research, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 78-1C, 119-122.<br />
BLAKE, W., Jr. 1982. Coring of frozen pond sediments, east-central Ellesmere Island: a progress<br />
report. In Current Research, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 82-1C, 104-110.<br />
7
HUGHES, O.L., and TERASMAE, J., 1963. Sipre Ice-corer for obtaining samples from<br />
permanently frozen bogs. Arctic 16(4):271-272.<br />
VEILLETTE, J.J., and Nixon, F.M. 1980. Portable drilling equipment for shallow permafrost<br />
sampling. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 79-21, 35pp.<br />
8
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Development of this system was made possible by financial support from the Danish<br />
Environmental Protection Agency as part of the environmental support program DANCEA –<br />
Danish Cooperation for Environment in the Arctic and The University of Southern Denmark,<br />
Department of Chemistry. Stihl GmbH (Switzerland and Sweden) provided us with a BT 360 two-<br />
man motor, extension rods for initial laboratory and field-testing of the prototype corer, as well as<br />
relevant technical specifications. AN IARC grant (to 3d author) provided for the fieldwork on<br />
Bathurst Island and for this work, and Stihl Canada loaned us a BT 360 two-man motor and<br />
provided technical manuals, oil, and spare parts (thanks to K. Eberle, G. Quigg and E. Zynomirski).<br />
Special thanks to Weston Blake Jr. for his assistance while we were preparing the sampling plans,<br />
testing and building the corer and for providing his original peat cores from Bathurst Island for<br />
testing, in addition to critically reading this manuscript. For the fieldwork phases we would like to<br />
thank our scientific colleagues: Dr.’s A. Cheburkin, O. Bennike and E. Warncke. The help from<br />
team members who did not take part in the fieldwork, especially Dr. C. Lohse, N. Givelet and G. Le<br />
Roux (esp. Fig. 4 and 5.) is gratefully acknowledged. M.E.G. was supported by a Ph.D. fellowship<br />
from NERI and the Danish Research Agency, as a graduate student at the University of<br />
Copenhagen (Global Change Initiative Graduate School) under the academic supervision of H.<br />
Skov, S. Lindberg, and O.J. Nielsen, for which he is most grateful.<br />
9
FIGURE CAPTIONS<br />
Fig. 1. Complete kit, minus the motor, fuel and core packing tubes weighs 26 kg. The kit as shown<br />
contains enough treated aircraft-aluminum extension rods to core a 10 m-deep, frozen peat deposit.<br />
Extra sets of teeth, maintenance tools, a manual core recovery system, attachments to turn the core<br />
manually if needed and a plastic pusher attachment (for an extension rod), to manually push the<br />
core out of the tube into the polyethelene (PE) sock. A one-man motor (1.6 h.p.), 150 rpm, weighs<br />
approximately 6.8 kg, and a two-man motor (Stihl BT 360, 4.1 h.p.) weighs 25.9 kg. The gear<br />
reduction unit on the Stihl motor provides 50 r.p.m. Weight of fuel is 0.5 kg, which is sufficient for<br />
a few hours of operation. Packing material weighs an additional 3 kg (high density plastic core<br />
tubes with end cap). The cores themselves (70 cm x 9.7 cm) will weigh between 5 kg (pure frozen<br />
peat with bulk density of 1 g/cm 3 ) to 14 kg (sediment of bulk density 2.65 g/cm 3 ).<br />
Fig. 2. Quick-release motor drive shaft to corer-tube coupling system. It is important to remove the<br />
corer as quickly as possible from the coring tube. The quick release locks and unlocks the motor to<br />
the coring tube with the press of one button and has just three connecting points, allowing chips to<br />
fall into the tube when drilling below surface levels.<br />
Fig. 3. Spring-loaded cutting blades on the inside of the cutting head cut through the bottom of the<br />
core when the motor is stopped and the direction is manually reversed. These can easily be replaced<br />
or sharpened in the field. They stay together and are thick enough to bear the weight of the core<br />
when it is lifted out of the hole.<br />
Fig. 4. Horizontally hinged mounted band saw, on an aluminium frame, with adjustable backstop<br />
for varying the slice thickness. The bottom cover of the band saw is removed during operation, so<br />
that debris does not accumulate and allows quick and easy cleaning between slicing.<br />
10
Fig. 5. The stainless steel (AISI 304) press for volumetric sub sampling of frozen slices. A sub<br />
sample is shown beside the slice.<br />
Fig. 6. Senior author standing on top of a peat mound at the Nordvestø peat site (July, 2001) with<br />
the assembled corer and 1 man (1.6 h.p.) motor. Although one man can operate the corer, a two-<br />
man team is the minimum necessary for safe field operations in Arctic conditions, and this also<br />
expedites the labelling and packing of the cores.<br />
11
Fig. 1<br />
12
Fig. 2.<br />
13
Fig. 3.<br />
14
Fig. 4.<br />
15
Fig. 5.<br />
16
Fig. 6.<br />
17