Social Landlords in Scotland: Shaping up for improvement
Social Landlords in Scotland: Shaping up for improvement
Social Landlords in Scotland: Shaping up for improvement
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Social</strong> <strong>Landlords</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Scotland</strong>: Shap<strong>in</strong>g <strong>up</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>improvement</strong>.reduce or remove <strong>in</strong>equalities <strong>in</strong> staff<strong>in</strong>g, access to services etc. And whilelandlords collect a range of equalities <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on service delivery andother activities, they are not good at analys<strong>in</strong>g and us<strong>in</strong>g the monitor<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation rout<strong>in</strong>ely gathered to review progress and plan <strong>for</strong> practical<strong>improvement</strong>s.Access to houses4.15 Almost all local authorities and RSLs have hous<strong>in</strong>g lists that are open to allpeople over the age of fifteen. Many now seek to maximise access tohous<strong>in</strong>g by participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> common hous<strong>in</strong>g registers, although thedevelopment of these has often been difficult and lengthy.4.16 The legislative framework <strong>for</strong> the allocation of social hous<strong>in</strong>g is largelypermissive, and most landlords make most of their lets to people <strong>in</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>gneed. We base our assessments of landlords’ approaches to allocations onthe legislation, statutory guidance, and published good practice. We havefound areas <strong>for</strong> <strong>improvement</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g fairly frequently <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>spections –although, not all of them are found <strong>in</strong> every landlord. The key areas <strong>in</strong> whichlandlords could improve are:a) understand<strong>in</strong>g statutory requirements, particularly around reasonablepreference and what factors landlords can take <strong>in</strong>to account whenlett<strong>in</strong>g houses;b) improv<strong>in</strong>g the quality of hous<strong>in</strong>g options advice and <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong>applicants;c) articulat<strong>in</strong>g the rationale <strong>for</strong> the focus of allocation policies and lett<strong>in</strong>gplans, <strong>in</strong> a way that connects with the landlord’s strategic objectives andis underp<strong>in</strong>ned by an analysis of need and demand. <strong>Landlords</strong> shouldunderstand the outcomes <strong>for</strong> people who apply <strong>for</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g and have<strong>in</strong>telligence about who is be<strong>in</strong>g housed;d) assess<strong>in</strong>g the use of suspensions and cancellations, and bettermanagement of the use of suspensions (<strong>for</strong> example, advice to theapplicant, opportunity <strong>for</strong> review or appeal, time limit on thesuspension); ande) enhanc<strong>in</strong>g transparency <strong>in</strong> lett<strong>in</strong>g decisions (particularly when applicantsare bypassed) and improv<strong>in</strong>g the limited quality assurance of decisionsthroughout the allocation process.21