10.07.2015 Views

Bashar's Syria: The Regime and its Strategic Worldview Shmuel Bar ...

Bashar's Syria: The Regime and its Strategic Worldview Shmuel Bar ...

Bashar's Syria: The Regime and its Strategic Worldview Shmuel Bar ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

368 S. <strong>Bar</strong>naturally come with the status of the president’s son, <strong>and</strong> a lover of technology <strong>and</strong> scientificprogress.Bashar inherited <strong>Syria</strong> from his father along with the structure of the regime <strong>and</strong> thesingular role of the president within it. In this context, he also inherited the personality cult,with appropriate adaptations to his age, background, personality, <strong>and</strong> education. Instead ofmilitary imagery <strong>and</strong> allusions to heroes of the past, the cult of Bashar emphases his wideeducation, modernism, <strong>and</strong>—most significantly—his role as the carrier of the legacy of hisfather <strong>and</strong> personification of his last will. He has been poetically referred to as the “Lion Cub”(a play on the name Asad, which means “lion” in Arabic). Islamic allusions also have beenrecruited to legitimize the succession. An article in the regime newspaper al-Thawra bestexpressed this by addressing the late President, saying: “You remain forever <strong>and</strong> Bashar, theHope, is your replacement (khalifah).” 40 <strong>The</strong> use of the word khalifah (caliph) immediatelyevokes allusions of the status of the Prophet Mohammad, whose successors had divineauthority as the “replacements” (caliphs) of the Apostle of God. Bashar’s “coronation” wasin fact reminiscent more of royal succession than of a presidential regime; the day beforehis father’s death he had no official position either in the party or the state structure. Hissuccession had to be “legalized” by changing the constitution (clause 83 stipulated that theminimum age for the president should be 40, while Bashar was at the time of successionwas only 34 years old) <strong>and</strong> by a “referendum.”<strong>The</strong> young president is portrayed in the <strong>Syria</strong>n media as representing the continuity<strong>and</strong> stability that Hafez al-Asad gave to the <strong>Syria</strong>n people; enjoying a strong internationalstatus; being loved by the <strong>Syria</strong>n people; strong <strong>and</strong> decisive, not hesitating to act againstcorruption, including by taking on the strongest of <strong>Syria</strong>’s elite; <strong>and</strong> combining in hispersonality both the inherited wisdom <strong>and</strong> political acumen of his father (who held <strong>Syria</strong>together <strong>and</strong> granted it stability) <strong>and</strong> the zest <strong>and</strong> modernity of youth. 41 <strong>The</strong>se motifs arepart of the daily propag<strong>and</strong>a fare that the <strong>Syria</strong>n citizen receives as part of the burgeoningpersonality cult of the new president. Upon his election, Bashar was reputed to have issuedorders to put a halt to the more sycophantic expressions. No significant change can beidentified, though.This attempt to pass on the cult of adulation of Hafez al-Asad to his son-successor hasnot been smooth. <strong>The</strong> underlying reasons for the acceptance of that cult—awe <strong>and</strong> fear of apresident who had achieved domestic deterrence by actually using his oppressive power—are either nonexistent or considerably weaker in the case of Bashar than was the case withhis father. While the instruments of oppression did not disappear upon Bashar’s accession,their deterrence was weakened by the new president’s bid for “openness” <strong>and</strong> clemency.<strong>The</strong> changes in the leadership of the security organizations (see below) also reduced theirintimidation of the public.Bashar’s stature as president in the eyes of the <strong>Syria</strong>n public— <strong>and</strong> more significantlyin the eyes of the mainstays of the regime—is h<strong>and</strong>icapped by factors inherent in the processthat brought him to power: (1) his arrival at power not by his own manipulation of powerwithin the regime but by the will of his dead father (in a country in which all previous leaderssince independence have come to power by coups of one sort or another); (2) the fact thathe was not his father’s original choice for succession; (3) the relatively limited—in time<strong>and</strong> scope—period of political apprenticeship, particularly the lack of real military trainingor experience; (4) the presence within the regime of a formidable “old guard” which, byvirtue of having been privy to the wills <strong>and</strong> ways of the late father <strong>and</strong> president for a longerperiod than Bashar himself had, wields “moral weight.”Along with all the above, as in any case in which a leader who ruled for decades issucceeded by a younger successor, the comparison favors the former. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!