Rocktail case presentation by Anna Spenceley - The African Safari ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Planning & development issues:Institutional Arrangements (RBeachC(RBeachC)Rental9% turnoverIWPALessor15+5-yr BOT &transfer to IWPAWilderness Safaris (75%) +Small Business DevelopmentCompany (25%)Lessee & Developer and OperatorKwaMpukaneCommunity Trust9 members electedfrom communitySmall Business DevelopmentCompany PTYJoint venture: WS + KwaMpukane Trust50%:50%2 members WS: 2 members Trust• JV company has 2 named WS directors; 2 KMT members – but this willchange to being 2 representatives of each organisation (problems withcontinuity if Trust members re-elected annually)• Single company doing ownership and development and management• KwaMpukane effectively owns 12.5% equity; WS effectively owns 87.5%Clive Poultney
Planning & development issues:Previously tried Institutional Arrangements• Rocktail Bay Lodge• Joint-venturearrangement did notwork well• Consistentmismanagement ofdividends that went toTrust, despite 3separate elections oftrustees• Few local benefitsrealised 29 jobsPoultney and Spenceley, 2001
Page 2 and 3: Contents• Overview of the initiat
Page 4 and 5: Rocktail BeachCamp
Page 6 and 7: Policy context• Concession policy
Page 8 and 9: • Chalets nestledamong trees
Page 12 and 13: Tourism products and activitiesWith
Page 14 and 15: Impacts of tourism• Environmental
Page 16 and 17: Coastal forestSecondary dune
Page 18: Social impacts (1)• Governance: T
Page 21 and 22: Social impacts:Training and skills
Page 23 and 24: Economic impacts (1)• Ownership/e
Page 25 and 26: Economic impacts:Capital structure
Page 27 and 28: Economic impacts:Commercial issues
Page 29 and 30: Current issues andreplicability•

Rocktail case presentation by Anna Spenceley - The African Safari ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?