10.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of the Untangled symposium: - WSPA

Proceedings of the Untangled symposium: - WSPA

Proceedings of the Untangled symposium: - WSPA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Annex 2Priority problems and solutionsSolution 3: A global ban on gill nets.• Target stakeholders: UN; governments• Motivation (<strong>of</strong> targets): would save millions <strong>of</strong> animalsworldwide – decreased by-catch and marine debrisrelatedanimal suffering; level <strong>the</strong> playing field forall fishermen worldwide; would protect endangeredspecies (conservation incentive); increased health <strong>of</strong>global ocean ecosystem• Challenges: would have to be done globally so <strong>the</strong>reis no advantage to those who continue to use gillnets; huge economic impact on fisheries and fishingcommunities; lack <strong>of</strong> political will; impact on foodsupply and no alternative food sources in some areas;fishing industry revolt; lack <strong>of</strong> alternatives to gill nets;insufficient organisation <strong>of</strong> multiple stakeholders;financial resources to fight this fight; historical andcultural barriers• Time frame: 20 years.Packaging/consumer litterProblem 1: Single-use carrier bags (whe<strong>the</strong>rintentionally or accidently improperly disposed<strong>of</strong> by consumers) enter <strong>the</strong> waterways and oceanswhere <strong>the</strong>y are ingested by marine mammalsand turtles, causing gut blockage and internalcomplications resulting in decreased health <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> animal and/or death.Solution: Local to centralised governments impose afee for single-use plastic bags which would discourageexcessive use by retailers and consumers.• Target stakeholders: central government (municipal/state/federal)• Motivation (<strong>of</strong> targets): revenue generated by <strong>the</strong>fee could subsidise government funded clean-up<strong>of</strong> waterways; compensate retailers for programmeparticipation; once in place this policy will make anear-immediate impact; good precedents are already inplace in some places, i.e. Washington DC – where <strong>the</strong>bag fee has raised $2 million towards cleaning up <strong>the</strong>river and a significant reduction in plastic bag waste;success in Maryland has been aided by consumers’ability to identify with <strong>the</strong> piece <strong>of</strong> water aimed at beingcleaned up; an analysis could be done to show <strong>the</strong>economic benefits <strong>of</strong> reduced use; increased marketing<strong>of</strong> reusable bags would get <strong>the</strong>se companies on side• Challenges: ingrained consumer behaviour/convenience lifestyle; lack <strong>of</strong> political will; resistancefrom plastics industry; easier to pass this legislation insome areas than in o<strong>the</strong>rs• Time frame: 1-2 years to introduce and pass legislation;1 year to require retailer compliance.18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!