10.07.2015 Views

5 - HKU Libraries - The University of Hong Kong

5 - HKU Libraries - The University of Hong Kong

5 - HKU Libraries - The University of Hong Kong

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 8Superficial Deposits and WeatheringClassification and DistributionSuperficial deposits, comprising accumulations <strong>of</strong> sediment derived from the weathering and erosion <strong>of</strong>older rocks, are widespread in both onshore and <strong>of</strong>fshore parts <strong>of</strong> the district. <strong>The</strong>y mantle an <strong>of</strong>ten deeplyweathered rock surface and vary from discontinuous veneers <strong>of</strong> slope debris and alluvium in onshore areas,to laterally extensive mud and sand sheets up to several tens <strong>of</strong> metres thick in <strong>of</strong>fshore areas. <strong>The</strong> environments<strong>of</strong> deposition are shown in Figure 10.In onshore areas, the superficial deposits on the higher ground consist mostly <strong>of</strong> colluvium (slopedebris, etc) much <strong>of</strong> which is derived from processes <strong>of</strong> mass movement. Downslope, the colluviumgrades into, and interdigitates with, alluvium which infills the major valleys. <strong>The</strong> boundary betweenthe two deposits is <strong>of</strong>ten difficult to define as many <strong>of</strong> the superficial deposits in the larger valleyshave been disturbed by cultivation.<strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore superficial deposits <strong>of</strong> the district comprise four formations; the Tung Chung Formation, theChek Lap Kok Formation, the Sham Wat Formation and the Hang Hau Formation. <strong>The</strong>y have been identifiedon lithological, palaeontological and geotechnical evidence from borehole cores and on the basis <strong>of</strong> seismiccharacter as displayed on shallow seismic reflection records (Fyfe et al., 2000).Correlation between onshore and <strong>of</strong>fshore superficial deposits is problematic. <strong>The</strong> onshore Pleistocene alluvialdeposits can generally be matched with Pleistocene alluvial deposits now <strong>of</strong>fshore (Chek Lap Kok Formation).However, there is no such straight-forward correlation between onshore Pleistocene mass wasting deposits(slope debris, debris flow deposits, etc) and potential lateral equivalents now lying <strong>of</strong>fshore. Fyfe et al.,(2000), have tentatively linked these onshore mass wasting deposits with occasional thin colluvial interbedsin the <strong>of</strong>fshore Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Holocene colluvial deposits, described variously as debris flowdeposits, slope debris, slide deposits, and talus deposits on 1:20 000-scale geological maps, have recentlybeen assigned to the Fan Ling Formation (Fyfe et al., op. cit.) and are considered to be contemporaneouswith the Hang Hau Formation. However, on the 1:5 000-scale map series, the lithostratigraphic units are thesame as those in the 1:20 000-scale map series.fQl- lie QhbSCJfHWQhmSQ h mM———Qp a^W^^Rock andweathered rock- ^Figure 10 - Schematic Section Showing the Relationship between Superficial Deposits and the DifferentEnvironments <strong>of</strong> DepositionQp = Pleistocene; Qh = Holocene; Q = Quaternary (undivided);a = alluvial; b = beach; e = estuarine; i = intertidal; m = marine;D = debris; S = sand; M = mud; HW = high-water level40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!