Buckley P. J., Carter M. J., 2004, A formal analysis of knowledge comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong>Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises, Journal of International Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Studies, Vol. 35. No. 5, pp. 371-384.Buckley P. J., Casson, M., 2002, The Future of the Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprise: 25 th AnniversaryEdition, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Caplen B., 2001, Editorial, Inside FDI, FDI Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, 2 November.Chia S.Y., 2004, ASEAN-Ch<strong>in</strong>a Free Trade Area, Conference Paper, AEP Conference,Hong Kong, 12-13 April.Chen Yu-Fu, Funke M., 2003, Option Value, Policy Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty, and the <strong>Foreign</strong> DirectInvestment Decision, HWWA, Discussion Paper, No. 234, Hamburg Institute ofInternational Economics, June.Comeau L., 2003, The Political Economy of Growth <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> America and East <strong>Asia</strong>: SomeEmpirical Evidence, Contemporary Economic Policy, Vol. 21, No. 4, October, pp. 476-489.Dagn<strong>in</strong>o G. B., 2004, Complex systems as key drivers for the emergence of a resource- andcapability-based <strong>in</strong>terorganizational network, E:CO Emergence, Special Double Issue, Vol.6, Nos. 1-2, Fall, pp. 61-69.D’Avanzo R., von Lew<strong>in</strong>ski H., van Wassenhove L. N., 2003, The l<strong>in</strong>k between SupplyCha<strong>in</strong> and F<strong>in</strong>ancial Performance, Supply Cha<strong>in</strong> Management Review, Nov/Dec, pp. 40-47.Dicken P., 2003a, Global Shift: Reshap<strong>in</strong>g the Global Economic Map <strong>in</strong> the 21 st Century, London:SAGE Publications.__________, 2003b, Global Production Networks <strong>in</strong> Europe and East <strong>Asia</strong>: TheAutomobile Components Industries, GPN Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, No.7, May, School ofEnvironmental and Development, University of Manchester, U. K.Dobson W., Chia S. Y., Eds., 1997, Mult<strong>in</strong>ationals and East <strong>Asia</strong> Integration, S<strong>in</strong>gapore: ISEAS.Dunn<strong>in</strong>g J. H., 2000, The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Bus<strong>in</strong>essTheories of MNE Activity, International Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 163-190.__________, 1988, The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement andSome Possible Extensions, Journal of International Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Studies, Vol. 19, No.1, Spr<strong>in</strong>g, pp.1-32.Fioretti G., Visser B., 2004, A cognitive <strong>in</strong>terpretation of organizational complexity, E:COEmergence, Special Double Issue, Vol. 6, Nos. 1-2, Fall, pp. 11-23Freeman N. J., Bartels F. L., 2000, Portfolio Investment <strong>in</strong> <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Asia</strong>’s Stock Markets:A survey of <strong>in</strong>vestor perceptions, The <strong>Asia</strong> Pacific Journal of Economic and Bus<strong>in</strong>ess, Vol. 4, No.1, June, pp. 28-58.98
Freeman N. J., Bartels F. L., Eds., 2004, The Future of <strong>Foreign</strong> Direct Investment <strong>in</strong> <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Asia</strong>,London: RoutledgeCurzon.Fukao K., Ishido H., Ito K., 2003, Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and <strong>Foreign</strong> DirectInvestment <strong>in</strong> East <strong>Asia</strong>, Discussion Paper Series A, No.434, The Institute of EconomicResearch, Hitotsubashi, Japan, January.Ito K., Fukao K., 2003, Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and Division of Labor <strong>in</strong> East <strong>Asia</strong>,Discussion Paper Series A, No.444, The Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi,Japan, October.Giroud A., 2003a, Transnational Corporations Technology and Economic Development: BackwardL<strong>in</strong>kages and Knowledge Transfer <strong>in</strong> <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Asia</strong>, Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar.Giroud A., 2003b, TNC, Intra- and Inter-firms Networks: The case of the ASEAN region,Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, No. 03/25, School of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess, University of Bradford, U. K.Giroud A., Mirza H., 2004, Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Enterprises and Local Input l<strong>in</strong>kages <strong>in</strong> <strong>Southeast</strong><strong>Asia</strong>, Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, No. 04/41, School of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess, University of Bradford, U. K.,November.Hertz S., Macquet M., 2001, How Third Party Logistics Providers Create Effectiveness andEfficiency by coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g Customers Activities and Strategies, SSE/EFI Work<strong>in</strong>g PaperSeries <strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, No.2001: 10, Stockholm School of Economics,November.Hill H., Ed., 2002, <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Asia</strong>n Economic Development, Vol. 1-4, Cheltenham: EdwardElgar.__________, 2001, Technology and Innovation <strong>in</strong> Develop<strong>in</strong>g East <strong>Asia</strong>: An InterpretiveSurvey, Paper prepared for The World Bank Project on East <strong>Asia</strong>’s Future Economy,November RSPAS, Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, No. 2001/11, ANU. Australia.Hirst P., Thompson G. 1999, Globalization <strong>in</strong> Question: The International Economy and thePossibilities of Governance, 2 nd Ed., Cambridge: Polity Press.Janeba E., 2001, Attract<strong>in</strong>g FDI <strong>in</strong> a Politically Risky World, NBER, Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, No.8400, July.K<strong>in</strong>oshita T., Kishida H., Amemiya A., 2004, Strategy of Japanese Manufacturers <strong>in</strong> ASEANand Ch<strong>in</strong>a <strong>in</strong> light of emerg<strong>in</strong>g FTA <strong>in</strong>itiatives, Tokyo Club Foundation for Global Studies,Tokyo Club Research Conference, 8-9 November, Tokyo, Japan.Krugman P., 1996, The self-organiz<strong>in</strong>g Economy, Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.Laurenceson J., 2003, Economic Integration between Ch<strong>in</strong>a and the ASEAN-5, ASEANEconomic Bullet<strong>in</strong>, Vol. 20, No.2, August, pp. 103-11199
- Page 3:
Foreign Direct Investment in Southe
- Page 7 and 8:
PrefaceThis UNIDO report presents t
- Page 9 and 10:
PreambleWithin the constantly evolv
- Page 11 and 12:
IntroductionThe Changing Face of Fo
- Page 13 and 14:
Theme 1FDI and Multinational Enterp
- Page 15 and 16:
These include: i) changes in long-t
- Page 17 and 18:
quality of life in a country can be
- Page 19 and 20:
consequence, as well as in terms of
- Page 21 and 22:
high-technology cluster development
- Page 23 and 24:
Theme 3FDI, Boundaries, Hierarchies
- Page 25 and 26:
A second dimension is that incentiv
- Page 27 and 28:
industrial sector and sub-sector le
- Page 29 and 30:
industrial base without relying to
- Page 31 and 32:
socialising public goods and privat
- Page 33 and 34:
Typically, but not exclusively, Sin
- Page 35 and 36:
generate tax revenues to fund vario
- Page 37 and 38:
cumulatively serving to constrain F
- Page 39 and 40:
Southeast Asia as an integrated mar
- Page 41 and 42:
Theme 5FDI and Capital in Southeast
- Page 43 and 44:
Finally, there is also a need for i
- Page 45 and 46:
components of the integrated global
- Page 47 and 48:
ConclusionEmerging Policy Direction
- Page 49 and 50: In conclusion, Frank Bartels sugges
- Page 51 and 52: Taking the above research needs int
- Page 53 and 54: Annex 1:Presenters at the EGMName P
- Page 55 and 56: TIMOR LESTEMs. Warubon SUKASAMEMr.
- Page 57 and 58: 14:00 - 15:30 Theme II: Intra-regio
- Page 59 and 60: y Japan ITPOsCommentator: Frank L.
- Page 61 and 62: This type of deep information excha
- Page 63 and 64: The extent of FDI effects and their
- Page 65 and 66: Appendix IV: Opening Statement by U
- Page 67 and 68: only of UNIDO but also other UN spe
- Page 69 and 70: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONSAFTA - ASEAN F
- Page 71 and 72: in mind that host policy for attrac
- Page 73 and 74: forces of competition and co-operat
- Page 75 and 76: 2. BACKGROUND ISSUESAn accurate per
- Page 77 and 78: economies. In contrast, Sub-Saharan
- Page 79 and 80: costs, boost quality and accelerate
- Page 81 and 82: Fourthly, in terms of a framework f
- Page 83 and 84: in joint venturing), while retainin
- Page 85 and 86: experiencing the kind of global rel
- Page 87 and 88: other hand, being predominantly nat
- Page 89 and 90: Also, the trade surplus (or deficit
- Page 91 and 92: limited [Freeman and Bartels (2000)
- Page 93 and 94: technology and innovation policy; h
- Page 95 and 96: Credit Information Index NA 0 3 0 6
- Page 97 and 98: Appendix II - Investment climate in
- Page 99: REFERENCESAlmor T., Hirsch S., 1995
- Page 103: Trigeorgis L., 1996, Real Option: M