Evaluation of the Crash Course March 2009 - De Montfort University
Evaluation of the Crash Course March 2009 - De Montfort University
Evaluation of the Crash Course March 2009 - De Montfort University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section 7: Conclusions and recommendations<br />
7.1 Evidence and conclusions<br />
The original brief for this research from Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service and its<br />
partners was:<br />
- To evaluate <strong>the</strong> impact that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Crash</strong> <strong>Course</strong> has on <strong>the</strong> participants’<br />
attitudes to safe road user behaviour;<br />
- To evaluate <strong>the</strong> effect that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Crash</strong> <strong>Course</strong> has on participants’ intention to<br />
drive safely in future;<br />
- To determine <strong>the</strong> appropriateness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> content and delivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
programme for <strong>the</strong> primary target age group;<br />
- To evaluate <strong>the</strong> appropriateness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> content and delivery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project to<br />
meet its stated objectives;<br />
- To outline possible courses <strong>of</strong> action for progression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> programme.<br />
The brief included paying particular attention to gender differences in attitudes to<br />
driving and <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> peer pressure on young people.<br />
In this section <strong>the</strong>se main questions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study are addressed in relation to <strong>the</strong><br />
evidence from <strong>the</strong> observation visits; <strong>the</strong> questionnaires and focus groups for young<br />
people; and <strong>the</strong> interviews with <strong>the</strong> stakeholders. Those quantitative measures that<br />
reached or closely approached statistical significance are reported here alongside<br />
<strong>the</strong> trends <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> qualitative findings. The relevant statistical measures that did not<br />
reach significance are reported in Section 4.<br />
Does <strong>the</strong> course have a positive impact on <strong>the</strong> participants’ knowledge <strong>of</strong> safety<br />
issues?<br />
The evidence from <strong>the</strong> study indicates that <strong>Crash</strong> <strong>Course</strong> does have a positive<br />
impact on young people’s knowledge about how to be safer on <strong>the</strong> road. There were<br />
two knowledge based questions in <strong>the</strong> survey: one concerned <strong>the</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> road<br />
crashes and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r concerned <strong>the</strong> ways in which passengers could keep<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves safer. The comparison between those who had experienced <strong>the</strong> course<br />
and those who had not shows statistically significant higher total scores on <strong>the</strong><br />
questions designed to test knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> key causes <strong>of</strong> road collisions (p=0.001).<br />
The comparisons on <strong>the</strong> matched sample <strong>of</strong> young people before <strong>the</strong>y had received<br />
<strong>the</strong> course and afterwards showed improvement at a level approaching significance<br />
in respect <strong>of</strong> what <strong>the</strong>y could do to keep <strong>the</strong>mselves safer as passengers (p=0.068).<br />
Does <strong>the</strong> course have a positive impact on <strong>the</strong> participants’ attitudes to safe road<br />
user behaviour?<br />
The evidence shows that <strong>the</strong> course did have a consistent effect positive effect on<br />
attitudes towards <strong>the</strong> wearing <strong>of</strong> seat belts. At a statistically significant level, <strong>of</strong> those<br />
who completed <strong>the</strong> matched ‘before’ and ‘after’ questionnaires, more young people<br />
felt it was acceptable and “OK” always to wear a seat belt after <strong>the</strong> course than<br />
before (p