Evaluation of the Crash Course March 2009 - De Montfort University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX A List of adult stakeholders interviewed Chief Superintendent Mark Bates Staffordshire Police Colette Bennett Crash Course Coordinator (Victim Support) Richard Biffen Collision Investigator, Staffordshire Police Graham Bott Deputy Head of the Youth Service, Staffordshire County Council Councillor Eric N. Drinkwater Staffordshire County Council Donna Head Indigo Training Martyn Herward West Midlands Regional Manager, Victim Support Denise Horton Learning Support Practitioner and lead for ECM ‘Stay Safe’, Mitchell High School Bob Johnson Fire Safety Officer, Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service Nick Lloyd Head of Road Safety and Sustainable Travel, Staffordshire County Council Mark Ludlow Head of Year 11 (2007), Blurton High School Giles Millington Head of Year 11, St Thomas More High School Mark Mould Collision Investigation Officer, Staffordshire Police Ann Morris Crash Course Coordinator (Youth Service) Neil Mycock Senior Collision Investigator, Staffordshire Police Debbie Oakley Indigo Training Ian Smith HM Coroner, Staffordshire Stuart Smith Assistant Chief Fire Officer, Director of Safer Communities, Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service Maureen Sneyd Head of Year 11, Norton Canes High School Sally Wilding Deputy Head Teacher, Sir Thomas Boughey High School 71
APPENDIX B List of schools, colleges and training providers returning questionnaires and/or hosting focus groups Blurton High School, Blurton, Stoke-on-Trent Brownhills High School, Tunstall, Stoke-on-Trent Cannock Chase High School, Cannock Cannock College Clayton Hall Business and Language College Clough Hall, Kidsgrove, Stoke-on-Trent Indigo Training, training provider, Stafford Longton High School, Meir, Stoke-on-Trent Mitchell High School, Bucknall, Stoke-on-Trent Norton Canes High School, Cannock Painsley Catholic College, Cheadle Project Management, training provider, Stoke-on-Trent Retail Group Stoke Challenge, training provider St Thomas More School, Longton, Stoke-on-Trent Sir Graham Balfour High School, Stafford Sir Thomas Boughey High School, Halmerend, Stoke-on-Trent Stoke-on-Trent College, including Burslem Campus The Friary School, Lichfield Walton High School, Stafford Four sets of questionnaire returns were also sent in unlabelled. It has not been possible to identify the school, college or training provider. The researchers acknowledge with thanks their debt to the many teachers and tutors who assisted with the distribution of questionnaires and the organising of focus groups. Without their help, this study could not have been completed. 72
Page 1 and 2:
Staffordshire Fire & Rescue Service
Page 3 and 4:
5.6 Pastoral care for pupils 46 5.7
Page 5 and 6:
In the comparison of those who rece
Page 7 and 8:
oad collisions. The team requires f
Page 9 and 10:
Section 1: Introduction and backgro
Page 11 and 12:
Accident Prevention Trust, www.capt
Page 13 and 14:
Staffordshire, the ‘severity rati
Page 15 and 16:
the presenters had either personal
Page 17 and 18:
Section 2: The design and methodolo
Page 19 and 20:
The survey instruments constructed
Page 21 and 22: The questionnaires were piloted wit
Page 23 and 24: � If the course is perceived as b
Page 25 and 26: has also been suggested that risk-t
Page 27 and 28: (McKenna, 2006.) He also draws atte
Page 29 and 30: Section 4: Findings from the survey
Page 31 and 32: Comparing the ‘after’ responses
Page 33 and 34: (www.staffordshire.police.uk , 2009
Page 35 and 36: 4.5 Gender differences Significantl
Page 37 and 38: For self-reported behaviour on havi
Page 39 and 40: Table 4.4: Suggestions made by youn
Page 41 and 42: An illustrative selection of the co
Page 43 and 44: • There was evidence of some incr
Page 45 and 46: Practical logistics and professiona
Page 47 and 48: “My year thought it was excellent
Page 49 and 50: “No - the staff support is not su
Page 51 and 52: “When you compare what they do an
Page 53 and 54: “It’s all reality isn’t it. E
Page 55 and 56: It was horrible. Don’t remember m
Page 57 and 58: One. He’s just a sick driver - go
Page 59 and 60: Most saw their response as conditio
Page 61 and 62: Figure 6.2: Differences between mal
Page 63 and 64: Section 7: Conclusions and recommen
Page 65 and 66: frequently “scared about the driv
Page 67 and 68: This may show itself in the Crash C
Page 69 and 70: or ‘one-liners’ to use in respo
Page 71: 16. The Crash Course is currently t
Page 75 and 76: 3. Is there anything you would want
Page 77 and 78: 9. Circle the number on each scale
Page 79 and 80: Jonah, B. A. (1990). Age difference
show all

Evaluation of the Crash Course March 2009 - De Montfort University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?