11.07.2015 Views

Download Issue PDF - The Institute for Sacred Architecture

Download Issue PDF - The Institute for Sacred Architecture

Download Issue PDF - The Institute for Sacred Architecture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE SPIRIT OF MEDIATOR DEIA R T I C L E STHE RENEWAL OF CHURCH ARCHITECTURE BEFORE VATICAN IIIt is generally thought byliturgists and theorists ofliturgical architecture thatlittle occurred in the area ofrenewal of church designbe<strong>for</strong>e the Second VaticanCouncil. <strong>The</strong> architecturalmodernism of the post-Conciliarera has there<strong>for</strong>e oftenbeen thought to representthe Council’s artistic intentions.However, be<strong>for</strong>e theCouncil, church architecturehad already undergone significantchange in responseto the Liturgical Movementand Pius XII’s encyclicalMediator Dei (1947). Statementsof popes, architects,and pioneers of the LiturgicalMovement point to a liturgicaland architecturalcontext which presents avastly different approach toarchitecture than the starkinteriors presented by manyarchitects after the Council.Despite the prevailing beliefthat architectural modernismwas the only availableoption <strong>for</strong> the modernchurch, the early twentiethcentury provides considerableevidence of representational,historically-connectedand often beautifularchitectural designs responsiveto the same principlescanonized in thedocuments of Vatican II.SacrosanctumConciliumgrew directly out of theideas expressed in the LiturgicalMovement and MediatorDei, and must be read inthat context to convey a fullunderstanding of the authentic spirit ofVatican II regarding liturgical architecture.<strong>The</strong> Liturgical Movement inAmericaArchitects and liturgists of the earlytwentieth century proclaimed an almostunrelenting criticism of Victorian ecclesiasticaldesign. It was, they argued, the productof a pioneer mentality in American Catholicismin which poor and under-educatedpatrons hired uninspired architectsand purchased low quality mass-producedliturgical goods from catalogs. In response,Denis McNamaraVictorian ecclesiastical design: St. Mary’s Church, New Haven,Connecticut by James Murphy, 1874architect-authors like Charles Maginnisand Ralph Adams Cram called <strong>for</strong> moreadequate ecclesiastical design and furnishings.At the same time, the LiturgicalMovement began to establish its presencein the United States. <strong>The</strong> movement’s leadersbelieved that American liturgy had sufferedunder an individualist pioneer mentalityas well, leading to a minimalist liturgicalpractice and general lack of understandingabout the place of the Eucharisticliturgy in the life of the Church. <strong>The</strong> LiturgicalMovement mingled with the pre-existingtraditionally-based architectural designmethods of the 1920sand 1930s, and over the nextseveral decades wroughtconsiderable improvementin ecclesiastical design.One of the earliest Americanmouthpieces of the LiturgicalMovement was theBenedictine periodical OrateFratres, a journal of liturgyfounded by Benedictinemonk Virgil Michel andbased on his studies of philosophyand liturgy in Europein the 1920s. One of thejournal’s first articles, entitled“Why a LiturgicalMovement?,” was written byBasil Stegmann, O.S.B., whowas later to become an activeparticipant in the Americanliturgical discussions. 1 Heexplained the need <strong>for</strong> liturgicalre<strong>for</strong>m to an Americanchurch still generally unawareof European developments.Stegmann cited PiusX’s 1903 Motu propio whichexpressed the pope’s “mostardent desire to see the trueChristian spirit flourishagain” and which claimedthat “the <strong>for</strong>emost and indispensablefount is the activeparticipation in the mostholy mysteries and in thepublic and solemn prayer ofthe Church.” 2 Stegmanncalled <strong>for</strong> all members of theChurch to become intimatelyunited with Christ and <strong>for</strong>m“what St. Paul calls mysticallythe body of Christ.” <strong>The</strong>movement’s new concentrationon the baptistery, altarand improved participationnaturally lead to changes in church design.Other features of the Liturgical Movementincluded a “profound spirit of fidelity tothe Church,” a patristic revival, a new interestin Gregorian chant, the use of the Liturgyof the Hours <strong>for</strong> laypeople and themore frequent following of Latin-vernacularmissals. 3<strong>The</strong> early proponents of the LiturgicalMovement sought to improve liturgicalquality by putting the primary features ofthe liturgical life in their proper place. Previously,the prevailing individualist approachto liturgy meant that worshippers<strong>Sacred</strong><strong>Architecture</strong> Fall 2000 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!