City of Burnside Development Assessment Panel Minutes Held ...

Development Assessment Panel Minutes 2 April 2002Mr HF Le Messurier - Report No. PR 5450.2Development Application No: 180/147/02/C1Location: 134 Penfold Road, Wattle ParkProposal: Tree removal (1)P4025Councillor Gilbert moved that it be a recommendation to Council thatDevelopment Application No: 180/147/02 by Mr HF LeMessurier be refuseddevelopment approval and that the reasons for refusal are:That the tree forms a notable visual element to the landscape of the local area,andThe retaining wall is not considered to be a significant building or structure ofvalue.Seconded by Councillor HillierLost. A Division was called.ForCr HillierCr PalkCr GilbertCr BillsAgainstCr O’BrienCr CromptonCr CollinsCr MelickHer Worship the MayorThe Motion wasLOSTP4026Councillor Melick that it be a recommendation to Council that DevelopmentApplication No. 180/147/02/C1, by Mr HF Le Messurier be granted DevelopmentApproval subject to the following condition:1. That two (2) evergreen trees, Grey Box (Eucalyptus microcarpa) of at least1 metre in height at time of planting, be planted in the front of the propertywithin three (3) months of the date of approval.Seconded by Councillor O'BrienCARRIEDS:\Agendas and Minutes\Development Assessment Panel\Minutes\2002\dap042002minuteswebsite.doc 4

Development Assessment Panel Minutes 2 April 2002Samuel James Homes - Report No. 5450.6Development Application No: 180/1084/01/CALocation: 5 Martindale Avenue, Toorak GardensProposal: Semi-detached dwellings with undercroft garagingP4029Councillor Gilbert moved that it be a recommendation to Council thatDevelopment Application No. 180/1084/01/CA by Samuel James Homes berefused Development Approval as it does not comply with the following:Council WideObjectives5, iib, c, e & 28Council WidePrinciples of Development Control18ai, ii, iii, iv, 18bi, ii, 19b, 23, 29 b & d, 121a, b, c, e, h, 125 and 138a, cR450 ZoneObjective1Principles of Development Control6a, b, ciii, 7diSeconded by Councillor HillierCARRIEDMr AJ Edwards - Report No. 5450.7Development Application No: 180/1379/01/C1Location: 16 Slapes Gully Road, BurnsideProposal: Two storey detached dwellingP4030Councillor Gilbert moved that it be a recommendation to Council thatDevelopment Application No. 180/1379/01/C1 be deferred to the next meeting ofthe Development Assessment Panel to be held on 7 May 2002 allowing theApplicant to address the issue inadequate setback to road frontage.Seconded by Councillor PalkCARRIEDUNANIMOUSLYS:\Agendas and Minutes\Development Assessment Panel\Minutes\2002\dap042002minuteswebsite.doc 6

Development Assessment Panel Minutes 2 April 2002Mrs M Andrews - Report No. 54570.8Development Application No: 180/211/02/C1Location: 18 Hallett Road, Wattle ParkProposal: Tree removal (1)Councillor Gilbert moved that it be a recommendation to Council thatDevelopment Application No: 180/211/02/C1 by Mrs M Andrews be refusedDevelopment Approval and that the reasons for refusal are:That the tree forms a notable visual element to the landscape of the localarea.That the trees make an important contribution to the character and amenityof the local area;It is part of a wildlife corridor and represents an important habitat for nativevegetation; andAppropriate remedial measures could be undertaken, in the pruning ofdeadwood.Seconded by Councillor HillierLost. A Division was called.Cr HillierCr PalkCr GilbertCr BillsCr O’BrienCr CromptonCr CollinsCr MelickHer Worship the MayorThe Motion wasLOSTP4031Councillor Melick moved that it be a recommendation to Council thatDevelopment Application No. 180/211/02/C1, by Mrs M Andrews be granteddevelopment approval. The planting of another tree to reduce the impact of theremoval would not be necessary, because of the presence of numerous trees onthe property.Seconded by Councillor CromptonCarried. A Division was called.Cr O’BrienCr CromptonCr CollinsCr MelickHer Worship the MayorCr HillierCr PalkCr GilbertCr BillsThe Motion wasCARRIEDS:\Agendas and Minutes\Development Assessment Panel\Minutes\2002\dap042002minuteswebsite.doc 7

Development Assessment Panel Minutes 2 April 2002Mr HH & Mrs JA Campbell - Report No. 5450.10Development Application No: 180/174/02/C1Location: 17 Cooper Angus Grove, Wattle ParkProposal: Tree removal (1)P4032Councillor Gilbert moved that it be a recommendation to Council thatDevelopment Application No. 180/174/02/C1 by Mr HH & Mrs JA Campbell bedeferred to the next meeting of the Development Assessment Panel to be held on7 May 2002 allowing the applicant time to amend the application taking intoaccount the Arborist's report dated 22 February 2002.Seconded by Councillor MelickCARRIEDScott Salisbury Homes - Report No. 5450.12Development Application No: 180/1170/01/CALocation: 24 Pridmore Road, Glen OsmondProposal: Two, two storey detached dwellings and tree removalP4033Councillor Palk moved that it be a recommendation to Council that DevelopmentApplication No: 180/1170/01/CA by Scott Salisbury Homes be refusedprovisional development plan consent and that the reasons for refusal are:The proposal will result in the removal of significant trees that form anotable visual element in the locality; andIt will result in an over development of the site in the context of theproposed site areas and density of the development in the locality.Seconded by Councillor CollinsCARRIEDMr S Douangphoumy & Mr VTY Low - Report No. 5450.14Development Application No: 180/22/02/C1Location: 31 Katoomba Road, BeaumontProposal: Tree RemovalCouncillor Hillier moved that it be a recommendation to Council thatDevelopment Application No: 180/22/02/C1 by Mr S Douangphoumy & Mr VTYLow be refused development approval and that the reasons for refusal are:That the trees form a notable visual element to the landscape of the localarea; andThey do not pose an unacceptable risk to private or public safety.Seconded by Councillor PalkLOSTP4034Councillor Collins moved that it be a recommendation to Council thatDevelopment Application No: 180/22/02/C1 by Mr S Douangphoumy & Mr VTYbe deferred to the next meeting of the Development Assessment Panel to be heldon 7 May 2002 to allow the applicant to amend the application to provide onlyfor the removal of tree numbered 4 in the far North Western Corner marked onthe plan received by Council on 10 January 2002.S:\Agendas and Minutes\Development Assessment Panel\Minutes\2002\dap042002minuteswebsite.doc 8

Development Assessment Panel Minutes 2 April 2002Seconded by Councillor MelickCARRIEDUNANIMOUSLYReview of Delegations - Report No. 5451.2P4035Councillor Palk moved that it be a recommendation to Council that:1. This report be received.2. That Tuesday 30 April 2002 be set as a workshop to discuss the issues raisedby the working party (Development Act 1993 delegations). Note the time forcommencement of the workshop to be determined nearer the date and electedmembers notified under separate cover.Seconded by Councillor GilbertThe Motion was putCARRIEDUNANIMOUSLYThe Mover noted that issues of this type fell outside the roll of the Panel.5.0 Other Business5.1 10 Duncan Road, BeaumontManager Development Assessment - Planning advised the DevelopmentAssessment Panel of the current status of 10 Duncan Road, Beaumont: 22 March 2002 – Court Determined that they cannot proceed with theappeal re the Land Division until the application for Fill has beendetermined. Application for Fill was refused by the Development AssessmentCommission. Council commented upon and opposed the application. Appeal lodged against the DAC refusal – Set down for conference on 15March 2002 Applicant has lodged three separate applications with the DAC forapproval, to create in total 10 allotments, 9 facing Duncan Road with aseparate parcel containing the remainder of the site.DAC will forward the applications to Council.Council has the opportunity as it has with the previous applications todeclare a conflict of interest and request that the Minister declare DAC therelevant authority.S:\Agendas and Minutes\Development Assessment Panel\Minutes\2002\dap042002minuteswebsite.doc 9

Development Assessment Panel Minutes 2 April 2002P4036Councillor Palk moved that it be a recommendation to Council that a report besupplied to Council for the meeting of Full Council to be held on 16 April 2002advising of what role Council may have in the process of determining theseapplications.Seconded by Councillor CromptonCARRIEDUNANIMOUSLY5.2 Policy - Undercroft GaragingCouncillor Hillier moved that it be a recommendation to Council that:P4033As a matter of Policy, Council does not support residential undercroft garaging,other than in situations where the natural topography leads to split levels as asensible (not contrived) design response.Seconded by Councillor GilbertCARRIED5.3 Proposed PAR - Undercroft ParkingCouncillor Hillier moved that it be a recommendation to Council that:P4034The General Manager, Planning & Environmental Services prepare a PlanAmendment Report reflecting the intent of the above policy, as soon as ispossible. (A realistic timeline is to be presented to the next meeting of Council of21 May, 2002).Seconded by Councillor PalkCARRIEDUNANIMOUSLYMeeting closed at 8.47pmCONFIRMED THIS.......................................................... DAY ....................................2002.......................................................Presiding MemberS:\Agendas and Minutes\Development Assessment Panel\Minutes\2002\dap042002minuteswebsite.doc 10